FKIE_CVE-2022-1591

Vulnerability from fkie_nvd - Published: 2022-09-19 14:15 - Updated: 2024-11-21 06:41
Severity
4.3 (Medium) - CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
Summary
The WordPress Ping Optimizer WordPress plugin before 2.35.1.3.0 does not have CSRF check in place when updating its settings, which could allow attackers to make a logged in admin change them via a CSRF attack
References
contact@wpscan.comhttps://wpscan.com/vulnerability/b1a52c7e-3422-40dd-af5a-ea4c622a87aaExploit, Patch, Third Party Advisory
af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108https://wpscan.com/vulnerability/b1a52c7e-3422-40dd-af5a-ea4c622a87aaExploit, Patch, Third Party Advisory
Impacted products
Vendor Product Version
wordpress_ping_optimizer_project wordpress_ping_optimizer *
To clipboard 

{
  "configurations": [
    {
      "nodes": [
        {
          "cpeMatch": [
            {
              "criteria": "cpe:2.3:a:wordpress_ping_optimizer_project:wordpress_ping_optimizer:*:*:*:*:*:wordpress:*:*",
              "matchCriteriaId": "98C64997-5D7F-4848-A5AD-1C6CE6522280",
              "versionEndExcluding": "2.35.1.3.0",
              "vulnerable": true
            }
          ],
          "negate": false,
          "operator": "OR"
        }
      ]
    }
  ],
  "cveTags": [],
  "descriptions": [
    {
      "lang": "en",
      "value": "The WordPress Ping Optimizer WordPress plugin before 2.35.1.3.0 does not have CSRF check in place when updating its settings, which could allow attackers to make a logged in admin change them via a CSRF attack"
    },
    {
      "lang": "es",
      "value": "El plugin Ping Optimizer de WordPress versiones anteriores a 2.35.1.3.0, no presenta una comprobaci\u00f3n de tipo CSRF cuando es actualizada su configuraci\u00f3n, lo que podr\u00eda permitir a atacantes hacer que un administrador conectado los cambie por medio de un ataque de tipo CSRF"
    }
  ],
  "id": "CVE-2022-1591",
  "lastModified": "2024-11-21T06:41:01.920",
  "metrics": {
    "cvssMetricV31": [
      {
        "cvssData": {
          "attackComplexity": "LOW",
          "attackVector": "NETWORK",
          "availabilityImpact": "NONE",
          "baseScore": 4.3,
          "baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
          "confidentialityImpact": "NONE",
          "integrityImpact": "LOW",
          "privilegesRequired": "NONE",
          "scope": "UNCHANGED",
          "userInteraction": "REQUIRED",
          "vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N",
          "version": "3.1"
        },
        "exploitabilityScore": 2.8,
        "impactScore": 1.4,
        "source": "nvd@nist.gov",
        "type": "Primary"
      }
    ]
  },
  "published": "2022-09-19T14:15:10.650",
  "references": [
    {
      "source": "contact@wpscan.com",
      "tags": [
        "Exploit",
        "Patch",
        "Third Party Advisory"
      ],
      "url": "https://wpscan.com/vulnerability/b1a52c7e-3422-40dd-af5a-ea4c622a87aa"
    },
    {
      "source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
      "tags": [
        "Exploit",
        "Patch",
        "Third Party Advisory"
      ],
      "url": "https://wpscan.com/vulnerability/b1a52c7e-3422-40dd-af5a-ea4c622a87aa"
    }
  ],
  "sourceIdentifier": "contact@wpscan.com",
  "vulnStatus": "Modified",
  "weaknesses": [
    {
      "description": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "value": "CWE-352"
        }
      ],
      "source": "contact@wpscan.com",
      "type": "Secondary"
    }
  ]
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.





Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.


Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.