FKIE_CVE-2021-27038

Vulnerability from fkie_nvd - Published: 2021-07-09 15:15 - Updated: 2026-06-17 03:44
Severity
7.8 (High) - CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Summary
A Type Confusion vulnerability in Autodesk Design Review 2018, 2017, 2013, 2012, 2011 can occur when processing a maliciously crafted PDF file. A malicious actor can leverage this to execute arbitrary code.
References
psirt@autodesk.comhttps://www.autodesk.com/trust/security-advisories/adsk-sa-2022-0004Patch, Vendor Advisory
af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108https://www.autodesk.com/trust/security-advisories/adsk-sa-2022-0004Patch, Vendor Advisory
Impacted products
Vendor Product Version
autodesk design_review 2011
autodesk design_review 2012
autodesk design_review 2013
autodesk design_review 2017
autodesk design_review 2018
To clipboard 

{
  "affected": [
    {
      "affectedData": [
        {
          "product": "Autodesk Design Review",
          "vendor": "n/a",
          "versions": [
            {
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "2018,\u00a02017,\u00a02013, 2012, 2011"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "source": "psirt@autodesk.com"
    }
  ],
  "configurations": [
    {
      "nodes": [
        {
          "cpeMatch": [
            {
              "criteria": "cpe:2.3:a:autodesk:design_review:2011:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
              "matchCriteriaId": "83CF6CDF-806C-4DC5-B572-C1C2BC2C25F2",
              "vulnerable": true
            },
            {
              "criteria": "cpe:2.3:a:autodesk:design_review:2012:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
              "matchCriteriaId": "2A78B6F8-DF84-4E6C-A247-0F6D2F8CA679",
              "vulnerable": true
            },
            {
              "criteria": "cpe:2.3:a:autodesk:design_review:2013:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
              "matchCriteriaId": "DCD2CA9B-16E1-4BE7-A4E1-A9817A503958",
              "vulnerable": true
            },
            {
              "criteria": "cpe:2.3:a:autodesk:design_review:2017:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
              "matchCriteriaId": "31F2529F-ECF0-4568-BBDC-82B396A52332",
              "vulnerable": true
            },
            {
              "criteria": "cpe:2.3:a:autodesk:design_review:2018:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
              "matchCriteriaId": "7D07C55F-1D23-4E2B-AC1E-67D735F800B7",
              "vulnerable": true
            }
          ],
          "negate": false,
          "operator": "OR"
        }
      ]
    }
  ],
  "cveTags": [],
  "descriptions": [
    {
      "lang": "en",
      "value": "A Type Confusion vulnerability in Autodesk Design Review 2018, 2017, 2013, 2012, 2011 can occur when processing a maliciously crafted PDF file. A malicious actor can leverage this to execute arbitrary code."
    },
    {
      "lang": "es",
      "value": "Una vulnerabilidad de confusi\u00f3n de tipo en Autodesk Design Review 2018, 2017, 2013, 2012, 2011 puede ocurrir al procesar un archivo PDF maliciosamente dise\u00f1ado. Un actor malicioso puede aprovechar esto para ejecutar c\u00f3digo arbitrario"
    }
  ],
  "id": "CVE-2021-27038",
  "lastModified": "2026-06-17T03:44:10.327",
  "metrics": {
    "cvssMetricV2": [
      {
        "acInsufInfo": false,
        "baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
        "cvssData": {
          "accessComplexity": "MEDIUM",
          "accessVector": "NETWORK",
          "authentication": "NONE",
          "availabilityImpact": "PARTIAL",
          "baseScore": 6.8,
          "confidentialityImpact": "PARTIAL",
          "integrityImpact": "PARTIAL",
          "vectorString": "AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:P",
          "version": "2.0"
        },
        "exploitabilityScore": 8.6,
        "impactScore": 6.4,
        "obtainAllPrivilege": false,
        "obtainOtherPrivilege": false,
        "obtainUserPrivilege": false,
        "source": "nvd@nist.gov",
        "type": "Primary",
        "userInteractionRequired": true
      }
    ],
    "cvssMetricV31": [
      {
        "cvssData": {
          "attackComplexity": "LOW",
          "attackVector": "LOCAL",
          "availabilityImpact": "HIGH",
          "baseScore": 7.8,
          "baseSeverity": "HIGH",
          "confidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
          "integrityImpact": "HIGH",
          "privilegesRequired": "NONE",
          "scope": "UNCHANGED",
          "userInteraction": "REQUIRED",
          "vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
          "version": "3.1"
        },
        "exploitabilityScore": 1.8,
        "impactScore": 5.9,
        "source": "nvd@nist.gov",
        "type": "Primary"
      }
    ]
  },
  "published": "2021-07-09T15:15:08.317",
  "references": [
    {
      "source": "psirt@autodesk.com",
      "tags": [
        "Patch",
        "Vendor Advisory"
      ],
      "url": "https://www.autodesk.com/trust/security-advisories/adsk-sa-2022-0004"
    },
    {
      "source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
      "tags": [
        "Patch",
        "Vendor Advisory"
      ],
      "url": "https://www.autodesk.com/trust/security-advisories/adsk-sa-2022-0004"
    }
  ],
  "sourceIdentifier": "psirt@autodesk.com",
  "vulnStatus": "Modified",
  "weaknesses": [
    {
      "description": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "value": "CWE-843"
        }
      ],
      "source": "nvd@nist.gov",
      "type": "Primary"
    }
  ]
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.





Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.


Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.