FKIE_CVE-2021-24553

Vulnerability from fkie_nvd - Published: 2021-08-23 12:15 - Updated: 2026-06-17 03:40
Summary
The Timeline Calendar WordPress plugin through 1.2 does not sanitise, validate or escape the edit GET parameter before using it in a SQL statement when editing events, leading to an authenticated SQL injection issue. Other SQL Injections are also present in the plugin
Impacted products
Vendor Product Version
timeline_calendar_project timeline_calendar *

{
  "affected": [
    {
      "affectedData": [
        {
          "product": "Timeline Calendar",
          "vendor": "Unknown",
          "versions": [
            {
              "lessThanOrEqual": "1.2",
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "1.2",
              "versionType": "custom"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "source": "contact@wpscan.com"
    }
  ],
  "configurations": [
    {
      "nodes": [
        {
          "cpeMatch": [
            {
              "criteria": "cpe:2.3:a:timeline_calendar_project:timeline_calendar:*:*:*:*:*:wordpress:*:*",
              "matchCriteriaId": "D1A7462E-D3EA-45B2-BE62-E92DF061ECCE",
              "versionEndIncluding": "1.2",
              "vulnerable": true
            }
          ],
          "negate": false,
          "operator": "OR"
        }
      ]
    }
  ],
  "cveTags": [],
  "descriptions": [
    {
      "lang": "en",
      "value": "The Timeline Calendar WordPress plugin through 1.2 does not sanitise, validate or escape the edit GET parameter before using it in a SQL statement when editing events, leading to an authenticated SQL injection issue. Other SQL Injections are also present in the plugin"
    },
    {
      "lang": "es",
      "value": "El plugin de WordPress Timeline Calendar versiones hasta 1.2, no sanea, comprueba o escapa del par\u00e1metro edit GET antes de usarlo en una sentencia SQL cuando se editan eventos, conllevando a un problema de inyecci\u00f3n SQL autenticada. Otras inyecciones SQL tambi\u00e9n est\u00e1n presentes en el plugin."
    }
  ],
  "id": "CVE-2021-24553",
  "lastModified": "2026-06-17T03:40:13.557",
  "metrics": {
    "cvssMetricV2": [
      {
        "acInsufInfo": false,
        "baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
        "cvssData": {
          "accessComplexity": "LOW",
          "accessVector": "NETWORK",
          "authentication": "SINGLE",
          "availabilityImpact": "PARTIAL",
          "baseScore": 6.5,
          "confidentialityImpact": "PARTIAL",
          "integrityImpact": "PARTIAL",
          "vectorString": "AV:N/AC:L/Au:S/C:P/I:P/A:P",
          "version": "2.0"
        },
        "exploitabilityScore": 8.0,
        "impactScore": 6.4,
        "obtainAllPrivilege": false,
        "obtainOtherPrivilege": false,
        "obtainUserPrivilege": false,
        "source": "nvd@nist.gov",
        "type": "Primary",
        "userInteractionRequired": false
      }
    ],
    "cvssMetricV31": [
      {
        "cvssData": {
          "attackComplexity": "LOW",
          "attackVector": "NETWORK",
          "availabilityImpact": "HIGH",
          "baseScore": 7.2,
          "baseSeverity": "HIGH",
          "confidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
          "integrityImpact": "HIGH",
          "privilegesRequired": "HIGH",
          "scope": "UNCHANGED",
          "userInteraction": "NONE",
          "vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
          "version": "3.1"
        },
        "exploitabilityScore": 1.2,
        "impactScore": 5.9,
        "source": "nvd@nist.gov",
        "type": "Primary"
      }
    ]
  },
  "published": "2021-08-23T12:15:09.793",
  "references": [
    {
      "source": "contact@wpscan.com",
      "tags": [
        "Exploit",
        "Third Party Advisory"
      ],
      "url": "https://codevigilant.com/disclosure/2021/wp-plugin-timeline-calendar/"
    },
    {
      "source": "contact@wpscan.com",
      "tags": [
        "Exploit",
        "Third Party Advisory"
      ],
      "url": "https://wpscan.com/vulnerability/14c75a00-a52b-430b-92da-5145e5aee30a"
    },
    {
      "source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
      "tags": [
        "Exploit",
        "Third Party Advisory"
      ],
      "url": "https://codevigilant.com/disclosure/2021/wp-plugin-timeline-calendar/"
    },
    {
      "source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
      "tags": [
        "Exploit",
        "Third Party Advisory"
      ],
      "url": "https://wpscan.com/vulnerability/14c75a00-a52b-430b-92da-5145e5aee30a"
    }
  ],
  "sourceIdentifier": "contact@wpscan.com",
  "vulnStatus": "Modified",
  "weaknesses": [
    {
      "description": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "value": "CWE-89"
        }
      ],
      "source": "contact@wpscan.com",
      "type": "Secondary"
    }
  ]
}



Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.

Loading…

Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.

Loading…

Loading…

Related by attack behaviour

Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.


Loading…