FKIE_CVE-2019-6689
Vulnerability from fkie_nvd - Published: 2019-04-26 19:29 - Updated: 2026-06-17 02:39
Severity
Summary
An issue was discovered in Dillon Kane Tidal Workload Automation Agent 3.2.0.5 (formerly known as Cisco Workload Automation or CWA). The Enterprise Scheduler for AIX allows local users to gain privileges via Command Injection in crafted Tidal Job Buffers (TJB) parameters. NOTE: this vulnerability exists because the CVE-2014-3272 solution did not address AIX operating systems.
References
Impacted products
| Vendor | Product | Version | |
|---|---|---|---|
| dillonkane | tidal_workload_automation | 3.2.0.5 |
{
"affected": [
{
"affectedData": [
{
"product": "n/a",
"vendor": "n/a",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "n/a"
}
]
}
],
"source": "cve@mitre.org"
}
],
"configurations": [
{
"nodes": [
{
"cpeMatch": [
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:a:dillonkane:tidal_workload_automation:3.2.0.5:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "09F8A6ED-46D2-44C5-A446-C0AA75FFCF02",
"vulnerable": true
}
],
"negate": false,
"operator": "OR"
}
]
}
],
"cveTags": [],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "An issue was discovered in Dillon Kane Tidal Workload Automation Agent 3.2.0.5 (formerly known as Cisco Workload Automation or CWA). The Enterprise Scheduler for AIX allows local users to gain privileges via Command Injection in crafted Tidal Job Buffers (TJB) parameters. NOTE: this vulnerability exists because the CVE-2014-3272 solution did not address AIX operating systems."
},
{
"lang": "es",
"value": "Se descubri\u00f3 un problema en Dillon Kane Tidal Workload Automation Agent versi\u00f3n 3.2.0.5 (conocido como Cisco Workload Automation o CWA). Enterprise Scheduler para AIX permite a los usuarios locales conseguir privilegios por medio de Inyecci\u00f3n de Comandos en los par\u00e1metros Tidal Job Buffers (TJB) creados. NOTA: esta vulnerabilidad existe porque la soluci\u00f3n CVE-2014-3272 no se dirigi\u00f3 a los sistemas operativos AIX."
}
],
"id": "CVE-2019-6689",
"lastModified": "2026-06-17T02:39:31.100",
"metrics": {
"cvssMetricV2": [
{
"acInsufInfo": false,
"baseSeverity": "HIGH",
"cvssData": {
"accessComplexity": "LOW",
"accessVector": "LOCAL",
"authentication": "NONE",
"availabilityImpact": "COMPLETE",
"baseScore": 7.2,
"confidentialityImpact": "COMPLETE",
"integrityImpact": "COMPLETE",
"vectorString": "AV:L/AC:L/Au:N/C:C/I:C/A:C",
"version": "2.0"
},
"exploitabilityScore": 3.9,
"impactScore": 10.0,
"obtainAllPrivilege": false,
"obtainOtherPrivilege": false,
"obtainUserPrivilege": false,
"source": "nvd@nist.gov",
"type": "Primary",
"userInteractionRequired": false
}
],
"cvssMetricV30": [
{
"cvssData": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackVector": "LOCAL",
"availabilityImpact": "HIGH",
"baseScore": 7.8,
"baseSeverity": "HIGH",
"confidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
"integrityImpact": "HIGH",
"privilegesRequired": "LOW",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.0/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"version": "3.0"
},
"exploitabilityScore": 1.8,
"impactScore": 5.9,
"source": "nvd@nist.gov",
"type": "Primary"
}
]
},
"published": "2019-04-26T19:29:00.713",
"references": [
{
"source": "cve@mitre.org",
"tags": [
"Third Party Advisory"
],
"url": "https://ashsecurity.wordpress.com/2019/04/25/an-improper-cisco-fix-for-cve-2014-3272/"
},
{
"source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"tags": [
"Third Party Advisory"
],
"url": "https://ashsecurity.wordpress.com/2019/04/25/an-improper-cisco-fix-for-cve-2014-3272/"
}
],
"sourceIdentifier": "cve@mitre.org",
"vulnStatus": "Modified",
"weaknesses": [
{
"description": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "CWE-77"
}
],
"source": "nvd@nist.gov",
"type": "Primary"
}
]
}
Loading…
Loading…
Experimental. This forecast is provided for visualization only and may change without notice. Do not use it for operational decisions.
Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date | Other |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…