FKIE_CVE-2019-11641

Vulnerability from fkie_nvd - Published: 2019-05-01 18:29 - Updated: 2024-11-21 04:21
Summary
Anomali Agave (formerly Drupot) through 1.0.0 fails to avoid fingerprinting by including predictable data and minimal variation in size within HTML templates, giving attackers the ability to detect and avoid this system.
References
Impacted products
Vendor Product Version
anomali agave *

{
  "configurations": [
    {
      "nodes": [
        {
          "cpeMatch": [
            {
              "criteria": "cpe:2.3:a:anomali:agave:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
              "matchCriteriaId": "0ACE5B38-0711-4A94-B943-AF9717CEC465",
              "versionEndIncluding": "1.0.0",
              "vulnerable": true
            }
          ],
          "negate": false,
          "operator": "OR"
        }
      ]
    }
  ],
  "cveTags": [],
  "descriptions": [
    {
      "lang": "en",
      "value": "Anomali Agave (formerly Drupot) through 1.0.0 fails to avoid fingerprinting by including predictable data and minimal variation in size within HTML templates, giving attackers the ability to detect and avoid this system."
    },
    {
      "lang": "es",
      "value": "Anomali Agave (anteriormente Drupot) hasta versi\u00f3n 1.0.0 falla al evitar las huellas digitales mediante la inclusi\u00f3n de datos predecibles y una variaci\u00f3n m\u00ednima en el tama\u00f1o de las plantillas HTML, lo que brinda a los atacantes la capacidad de detectar y evitar este sistema."
    }
  ],
  "id": "CVE-2019-11641",
  "lastModified": "2024-11-21T04:21:30.820",
  "metrics": {
    "cvssMetricV2": [
      {
        "acInsufInfo": false,
        "baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
        "cvssData": {
          "accessComplexity": "LOW",
          "accessVector": "NETWORK",
          "authentication": "NONE",
          "availabilityImpact": "NONE",
          "baseScore": 5.0,
          "confidentialityImpact": "PARTIAL",
          "integrityImpact": "NONE",
          "vectorString": "AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N",
          "version": "2.0"
        },
        "exploitabilityScore": 10.0,
        "impactScore": 2.9,
        "obtainAllPrivilege": false,
        "obtainOtherPrivilege": false,
        "obtainUserPrivilege": false,
        "source": "nvd@nist.gov",
        "type": "Primary",
        "userInteractionRequired": false
      }
    ],
    "cvssMetricV30": [
      {
        "cvssData": {
          "attackComplexity": "LOW",
          "attackVector": "NETWORK",
          "availabilityImpact": "NONE",
          "baseScore": 7.5,
          "baseSeverity": "HIGH",
          "confidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
          "integrityImpact": "NONE",
          "privilegesRequired": "NONE",
          "scope": "UNCHANGED",
          "userInteraction": "NONE",
          "vectorString": "CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N",
          "version": "3.0"
        },
        "exploitabilityScore": 3.9,
        "impactScore": 3.6,
        "source": "nvd@nist.gov",
        "type": "Primary"
      }
    ]
  },
  "published": "2019-05-01T18:29:01.550",
  "references": [
    {
      "source": "cve@mitre.org",
      "tags": [
        "Issue Tracking",
        "Third Party Advisory"
      ],
      "url": "https://github.com/threatstream/agave/issues/1"
    },
    {
      "source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
      "tags": [
        "Issue Tracking",
        "Third Party Advisory"
      ],
      "url": "https://github.com/threatstream/agave/issues/1"
    }
  ],
  "sourceIdentifier": "cve@mitre.org",
  "vulnStatus": "Modified",
  "weaknesses": [
    {
      "description": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "value": "CWE-330"
        }
      ],
      "source": "nvd@nist.gov",
      "type": "Primary"
    }
  ]
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…
Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.


Loading…

Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.

Loading…

Loading…