FKIE_CVE-2018-6851
Vulnerability from fkie_nvd - Published: 2018-07-09 18:29 - Updated: 2026-06-17 02:02| URL | Tags | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| cve@mitre.org | http://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/2018/Jul/20 | Mailing List, Third Party Advisory | |
| cve@mitre.org | https://community.sophos.com/kb/en-us/131934 | Patch, Vendor Advisory | |
| cve@mitre.org | https://labs.nettitude.com/blog/cve-2018-6851-to-cve-2018-6857-sophos-privilege-escalation-vulnerabilities/ | Exploit, Technical Description, Third Party Advisory | |
| af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108 | http://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/2018/Jul/20 | Mailing List, Third Party Advisory | |
| af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108 | https://community.sophos.com/kb/en-us/131934 | Patch, Vendor Advisory | |
| af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108 | https://labs.nettitude.com/blog/cve-2018-6851-to-cve-2018-6857-sophos-privilege-escalation-vulnerabilities/ | Exploit, Technical Description, Third Party Advisory |
| Vendor | Product | Version | |
|---|---|---|---|
| sophos | safeguard_easy_device_encryption_client | 6.00 | |
| sophos | safeguard_easy_device_encryption_client | 6.10 | |
| sophos | safeguard_easy_device_encryption_client | 7.00 | |
| sophos | safeguard_enterprise_client | 5.60.3 | |
| sophos | safeguard_enterprise_client | 6.00 | |
| sophos | safeguard_enterprise_client | 6.00.1 | |
| sophos | safeguard_enterprise_client | 6.10 | |
| sophos | safeguard_enterprise_client | 7.00 | |
| sophos | safeguard_enterprise_client | 8.00 | |
| sophos | safeguard_lan_crypt_client | 3.90.1 | |
| sophos | safeguard_lan_crypt_client | 3.90.2 | |
| sophos | safeguard_lan_crypt_client | 3.95.1 | |
| sophos | safeguard_lan_crypt_client | 3.95.1 |
{
"affected": [
{
"affectedData": [
{
"product": "n/a",
"vendor": "n/a",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "n/a"
}
]
}
],
"source": "cve@mitre.org"
}
],
"configurations": [
{
"nodes": [
{
"cpeMatch": [
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:a:sophos:safeguard_easy_device_encryption_client:6.00:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "2F57138C-7C06-496F-994E-0966CE8212C0",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:a:sophos:safeguard_easy_device_encryption_client:6.10:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "C35D6EE3-06A4-4720-A41F-A853CBF5AD31",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:a:sophos:safeguard_easy_device_encryption_client:7.00:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "3EC3A868-4328-4C39-9846-8E1182E747CB",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:a:sophos:safeguard_enterprise_client:5.60.3:vs-nfd:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "1831A4DA-2F50-411A-924F-FF0E15A593A0",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:a:sophos:safeguard_enterprise_client:6.00:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "7D8F90D7-7D25-418F-AE85-AD1D7E60DD18",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:a:sophos:safeguard_enterprise_client:6.00.1:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "864E1982-8947-4EF7-912D-CDFD74E8D134",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:a:sophos:safeguard_enterprise_client:6.10:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "60BBA33F-853D-407B-975B-A9182B259DB9",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:a:sophos:safeguard_enterprise_client:7.00:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "88E54DC4-12A5-452F-8DCE-890645585097",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:a:sophos:safeguard_enterprise_client:8.00:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "3075C40D-1FF9-46D0-80F3-2EF8E8423974",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:a:sophos:safeguard_lan_crypt_client:3.90.1:ts:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "4BCE0FAF-54C0-420D-BA05-F90848408515",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:a:sophos:safeguard_lan_crypt_client:3.90.2:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "4CD621BA-6AB7-427D-B6D0-D2D75D1ADC18",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:a:sophos:safeguard_lan_crypt_client:3.95.1:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "C82A7CD5-0703-47E1-BA4F-3797986CE139",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:a:sophos:safeguard_lan_crypt_client:3.95.1:ts:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "2D0F50CA-6C19-4ECF-97B7-6636A2756961",
"vulnerable": true
}
],
"negate": false,
"operator": "OR"
}
]
}
],
"cveTags": [],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "Sophos SafeGuard Enterprise before 8.00.5, SafeGuard Easy before 7.00.3, and SafeGuard LAN Crypt before 3.95.2 are vulnerable to Local Privilege Escalation via IOCTL 0x80206040. By crafting an input buffer we can control the execution path to the point where the constant DWORD 0 will be written to a user-controlled address. We can take advantage of this condition to zero-out the pointer to the security descriptor in the object header of a privileged process or modify the security descriptor itself and run code in the context of a process running as SYSTEM."
},
{
"lang": "es",
"value": "Sophos SafeGuard Enterprise en versiones anteriores a la 8.00.5, SafeGuard Easy en versiones anteriores a la 7.00.3, y SafeGuard LAN Crypt en versiones anteriores a la 3.95.2 son vulnerables a una escalada de privilegios local mediante IOCTL 0x80206040. Manipulando un b\u00fafer de entrada, es posible controlar la ruta de ejecuci\u00f3n al punto en el que la constante DWORD 0 se escribir\u00e1 en una direcci\u00f3n controlada por el usuario. Se puede aprovechar esta situaci\u00f3n para eliminar el puntero al descriptor de seguridad en la cabecera del objeto de un proceso privilegiado o modificar el descriptor de seguridad en s\u00ed para ejecutar c\u00f3digo en el contexto de un proceso que se est\u00e1 ejecutando como SYSTEM."
}
],
"id": "CVE-2018-6851",
"lastModified": "2026-06-17T02:02:21.333",
"metrics": {
"cvssMetricV2": [
{
"acInsufInfo": true,
"baseSeverity": "HIGH",
"cvssData": {
"accessComplexity": "LOW",
"accessVector": "LOCAL",
"authentication": "NONE",
"availabilityImpact": "COMPLETE",
"baseScore": 7.2,
"confidentialityImpact": "COMPLETE",
"integrityImpact": "COMPLETE",
"vectorString": "AV:L/AC:L/Au:N/C:C/I:C/A:C",
"version": "2.0"
},
"exploitabilityScore": 3.9,
"impactScore": 10.0,
"obtainAllPrivilege": false,
"obtainOtherPrivilege": false,
"obtainUserPrivilege": false,
"source": "nvd@nist.gov",
"type": "Primary",
"userInteractionRequired": false
}
],
"cvssMetricV30": [
{
"cvssData": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackVector": "LOCAL",
"availabilityImpact": "HIGH",
"baseScore": 7.8,
"baseSeverity": "HIGH",
"confidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
"integrityImpact": "HIGH",
"privilegesRequired": "LOW",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.0/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"version": "3.0"
},
"exploitabilityScore": 1.8,
"impactScore": 5.9,
"source": "nvd@nist.gov",
"type": "Primary"
}
]
},
"published": "2018-07-09T18:29:00.623",
"references": [
{
"source": "cve@mitre.org",
"tags": [
"Mailing List",
"Third Party Advisory"
],
"url": "http://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/2018/Jul/20"
},
{
"source": "cve@mitre.org",
"tags": [
"Patch",
"Vendor Advisory"
],
"url": "https://community.sophos.com/kb/en-us/131934"
},
{
"source": "cve@mitre.org",
"tags": [
"Exploit",
"Technical Description",
"Third Party Advisory"
],
"url": "https://labs.nettitude.com/blog/cve-2018-6851-to-cve-2018-6857-sophos-privilege-escalation-vulnerabilities/"
},
{
"source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"tags": [
"Mailing List",
"Third Party Advisory"
],
"url": "http://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/2018/Jul/20"
},
{
"source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"tags": [
"Patch",
"Vendor Advisory"
],
"url": "https://community.sophos.com/kb/en-us/131934"
},
{
"source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"tags": [
"Exploit",
"Technical Description",
"Third Party Advisory"
],
"url": "https://labs.nettitude.com/blog/cve-2018-6851-to-cve-2018-6857-sophos-privilege-escalation-vulnerabilities/"
}
],
"sourceIdentifier": "cve@mitre.org",
"vulnStatus": "Modified",
"weaknesses": [
{
"description": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "CWE-119"
}
],
"source": "nvd@nist.gov",
"type": "Primary"
}
]
}
Drag nodes to arrange them. Double-click a related vulnerability to open it, or a source to visit its link. The Physics button on the left tunes the layout and the simulation; the legend at the bottom left hides or shows nodes by kind and by sighting type.
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date | Other |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Vulnerability timeline
Sightings and recorded dates, grouped by day · UTC
How durations are calculated
Following the VTEM framework (Black Hat USA 2015), time to patch starts when the vendor or a coordinator was informed, total time to patch at discovery, and disclosure to patch at public disclosure; vendor response time runs from the report to its acknowledgement. Time to exploit and time unpatched start at the earliest discovery or report, falling back to public disclosure. Unpatched time ends at the first recorded patch, or the calculation time when no patch is recorded. Exploitation to patch shows the interval between those two events; a published proof of concept is a public exploit, not exploitation.
Each result shows its source dates. A negative interval means the end event came first; when date-only inputs leave the order open, the result says so. Date-only inputs are approximate. The earliest evidence wins: KEV report dates and sightings are labelled as such. Records describing another vulnerability are listed but never calculated from, and a PoC alone does not establish exploitation. Missing patch evidence does not prove that no patch exists. Filters below change the event list only.
Loading timeline…
The approach is described in our paper Mapping CVEs to MITRE ATT&CK Techniques: A Curated Gold-Set Classifier and the Limits of LLM-Assisted Label Expansion.
Browse all ATT&CK techniques and the vulnerabilities related to each.
Related by attack behaviour
Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.