FKIE_CVE-2017-17688
Vulnerability from fkie_nvd - Published: 2018-05-16 19:29 - Updated: 2026-06-17 01:11
Severity
Summary
The OpenPGP specification allows a Cipher Feedback Mode (CFB) malleability-gadget attack that can indirectly lead to plaintext exfiltration, aka EFAIL. NOTE: third parties report that this is a problem in applications that mishandle the Modification Detection Code (MDC) feature or accept an obsolete packet type, not a problem in the OpenPGP specification
References
{
"affected": [
{
"affectedData": [
{
"product": "n/a",
"vendor": "n/a",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "n/a"
}
]
}
],
"source": "cve@mitre.org"
}
],
"configurations": [
{
"nodes": [
{
"cpeMatch": [
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:a:apple:mail:-:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "217117AE-C16C-4265-A9A9-152D06FCD64E",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:a:apple:mail:-:*:*:*:*:iphone_os:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "081D62F6-B751-4109-B10B-3CF9535B3C12",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:a:bloop:airmail:-:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "F389CED1-846A-4807-B8E7-00FBECAA41A0",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:a:emclient:emclient:-:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "930AFDDA-C32A-45E7-BA6E-5827E59B573B",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:a:flipdogsolutions:maildroid:-:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "ED2616EA-332D-4D6E-B66C-137A166E181D",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:a:freron:mailmate:-:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "2C26D918-1548-4A62-BC5C-72DF9168A34E",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:a:horde:horde_imp:-:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "FDAD39AA-B9FD-492B-9BDA-57F74F4FABE5",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:a:microsoft:outlook:2007:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "D789259A-034E-40BB-9DFF-76B3104B212F",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:a:mozilla:thunderbird:-:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "FF583CDC-DE9E-45AB-9861-CB203BFA8862",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:a:postbox-inc:postbox:-:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "C0BA111F-A9FB-457D-818E-412195F9EA0A",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:a:r2mail2:r2mail2:-:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "19296516-EAD4-4B08-8D9A-5E853C7BEF58",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:a:roundcube:webmail:-:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "5010756A-99B8-4C05-9DAC-9BE19B8B6373",
"vulnerable": true
}
],
"negate": false,
"operator": "OR"
}
]
}
],
"cveTags": [
{
"sourceIdentifier": "cve@mitre.org",
"tags": [
"disputed"
]
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "The OpenPGP specification allows a Cipher Feedback Mode (CFB) malleability-gadget attack that can indirectly lead to plaintext exfiltration, aka EFAIL. NOTE: third parties report that this is a problem in applications that mishandle the Modification Detection Code (MDC) feature or accept an obsolete packet type, not a problem in the OpenPGP specification"
},
{
"lang": "es",
"value": "** EN DISPUTA ** La especificaci\u00f3n OpenPGP permite un ataque malleability-gadget Cipher Feedback Mode (CFB) que puede conducir indirectamente a la exfiltraci\u00f3n en texto plano. Esto tambi\u00e9n se conoce como EFAIL. NOTA: terceros indican que este es un problema en aplicaciones que gestionan de manera incorrecta la caracter\u00edstica de Modification Detection Code (MDC) o que afectan un tipo de paquete obsoleto, en lugar de un problema en la especificaci\u00f3n OpenPGP."
}
],
"id": "CVE-2017-17688",
"lastModified": "2026-06-17T01:11:29.613",
"metrics": {
"cvssMetricV2": [
{
"acInsufInfo": false,
"baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
"cvssData": {
"accessComplexity": "MEDIUM",
"accessVector": "NETWORK",
"authentication": "NONE",
"availabilityImpact": "NONE",
"baseScore": 4.3,
"confidentialityImpact": "PARTIAL",
"integrityImpact": "NONE",
"vectorString": "AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N",
"version": "2.0"
},
"exploitabilityScore": 8.6,
"impactScore": 2.9,
"obtainAllPrivilege": false,
"obtainOtherPrivilege": false,
"obtainUserPrivilege": false,
"source": "nvd@nist.gov",
"type": "Primary",
"userInteractionRequired": false
}
],
"cvssMetricV30": [
{
"cvssData": {
"attackComplexity": "HIGH",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "NONE",
"baseScore": 5.9,
"baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
"confidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
"integrityImpact": "NONE",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N",
"version": "3.0"
},
"exploitabilityScore": 2.2,
"impactScore": 3.6,
"source": "nvd@nist.gov",
"type": "Primary"
}
]
},
"published": "2018-05-16T19:29:00.223",
"references": [
{
"source": "cve@mitre.org",
"tags": [
"Third Party Advisory"
],
"url": "http://flaked.sockpuppet.org/2018/05/16/a-unified-timeline.html"
},
{
"source": "cve@mitre.org",
"tags": [
"Third Party Advisory",
"VDB Entry"
],
"url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/104162"
},
{
"source": "cve@mitre.org",
"tags": [
"Third Party Advisory",
"VDB Entry"
],
"url": "http://www.securitytracker.com/id/1040904"
},
{
"source": "cve@mitre.org",
"tags": [
"Exploit",
"Mitigation",
"Third Party Advisory"
],
"url": "https://efail.de"
},
{
"source": "cve@mitre.org",
"tags": [
"Third Party Advisory"
],
"url": "https://lists.gnupg.org/pipermail/gnupg-users/2018-May/060334.html"
},
{
"source": "cve@mitre.org",
"tags": [
"Issue Tracking",
"Third Party Advisory"
],
"url": "https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=17066419"
},
{
"source": "cve@mitre.org",
"tags": [
"Issue Tracking",
"Third Party Advisory"
],
"url": "https://protonmail.com/blog/pgp-vulnerability-efail"
},
{
"source": "cve@mitre.org",
"tags": [
"Third Party Advisory"
],
"url": "https://twitter.com/matthew_d_green/status/995996706457243648"
},
{
"source": "cve@mitre.org",
"tags": [
"Issue Tracking",
"Third Party Advisory"
],
"url": "https://www.patreon.com/posts/cybersecurity-15-18814817"
},
{
"source": "cve@mitre.org",
"tags": [
"Third Party Advisory"
],
"url": "https://www.synology.com/support/security/Synology_SA_18_22"
},
{
"source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"tags": [
"Third Party Advisory"
],
"url": "http://flaked.sockpuppet.org/2018/05/16/a-unified-timeline.html"
},
{
"source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"tags": [
"Third Party Advisory",
"VDB Entry"
],
"url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/104162"
},
{
"source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"tags": [
"Third Party Advisory",
"VDB Entry"
],
"url": "http://www.securitytracker.com/id/1040904"
},
{
"source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"tags": [
"Exploit",
"Mitigation",
"Third Party Advisory"
],
"url": "https://efail.de"
},
{
"source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"tags": [
"Third Party Advisory"
],
"url": "https://lists.gnupg.org/pipermail/gnupg-users/2018-May/060334.html"
},
{
"source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"tags": [
"Issue Tracking",
"Third Party Advisory"
],
"url": "https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=17066419"
},
{
"source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"tags": [
"Issue Tracking",
"Third Party Advisory"
],
"url": "https://protonmail.com/blog/pgp-vulnerability-efail"
},
{
"source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"tags": [
"Third Party Advisory"
],
"url": "https://twitter.com/matthew_d_green/status/995996706457243648"
},
{
"source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"tags": [
"Issue Tracking",
"Third Party Advisory"
],
"url": "https://www.patreon.com/posts/cybersecurity-15-18814817"
},
{
"source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"tags": [
"Third Party Advisory"
],
"url": "https://www.synology.com/support/security/Synology_SA_18_22"
}
],
"sourceIdentifier": "cve@mitre.org",
"vulnStatus": "Modified",
"weaknesses": [
{
"description": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "NVD-CWE-noinfo"
}
],
"source": "nvd@nist.gov",
"type": "Primary"
}
]
}
Loading…
Loading…
Drag nodes to arrange them. Double-click a related vulnerability to open it, or a source to visit its link. The Physics button on the left tunes the layout and the simulation; the legend at the bottom left hides or shows nodes by kind and by sighting type.
Experimental. This forecast is provided for visualization only and may change without notice. Do not use it for operational decisions.
Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date | Other |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Vulnerability timeline
Sightings and recorded dates, grouped by day · UTC
Loading timeline…
Loading…
Loading…
The MITRE ATT&CK techniques below are AI-generated suggestions, inferred from the description of the
vulnerability by the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-classification-roberta-base
model, served locally by ML-Gateway.
They have not been verified by an analyst and are provided for guidance only.
The approach is described in our paper Mapping CVEs to MITRE ATT&CK Techniques: A Curated Gold-Set Classifier and the Limits of LLM-Assisted Label Expansion.
Browse all ATT&CK techniques and the vulnerabilities related to each.
The approach is described in our paper Mapping CVEs to MITRE ATT&CK Techniques: A Curated Gold-Set Classifier and the Limits of LLM-Assisted Label Expansion.
Browse all ATT&CK techniques and the vulnerabilities related to each.
Loading…
Related by attack behaviour
Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.