FKIE_CVE-2016-8744
Vulnerability from fkie_nvd - Published: 2017-09-13 16:29 - Updated: 2026-06-17 00:54{
"affected": [
{
"affectedData": [
{
"product": "Apache Brooklyn",
"vendor": "Apache Software Foundation",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "0.9.0 and all prior versions"
}
]
}
],
"source": "security@apache.org"
}
],
"configurations": [
{
"nodes": [
{
"cpeMatch": [
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:a:apache:brooklyn:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "37F4D23C-1126-43D6-9C86-706C0B6D38D1",
"versionEndIncluding": "0.9.0",
"vulnerable": true
}
],
"negate": false,
"operator": "OR"
}
]
}
],
"cveTags": [],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "Apache Brooklyn uses the SnakeYAML library for parsing YAML inputs. SnakeYAML allows the use of YAML tags to indicate that SnakeYAML should unmarshal data to a Java type. In the default configuration in Brooklyn before 0.10.0, SnakeYAML will allow unmarshalling to any Java type available on the classpath. This could provide an authenticated user with a means to cause the JVM running Brooklyn to load and run Java code without detection by Brooklyn. Such code would have the privileges of the Java process running Brooklyn, including the ability to open files and network connections, and execute system commands. There is known to be a proof-of-concept exploit using this vulnerability."
},
{
"lang": "es",
"value": "Apache Brooklyn utiliza la librer\u00eda SnakeYAML para analizar sint\u00e1cticamente los valores de entrada en YAML. SnakeYAML permite el uso de etiquetas YAML para indicar que esta librer\u00eda deber\u00eda deserializar datos para tipo Java. En la configuraci\u00f3n por defecto en Brooklyn en versiones anteriores a la 0.10.0, SnakeYAML permite deserializar cualquier tipo de Java disponible en el classpath. Esto podr\u00eda proporcionar a un usuario autenticado los medios para hacer que la m\u00e1quina virtual Java que est\u00e1 ejecutando Brooklyn cargue y ejecute c\u00f3digo Java sin que Brooklyn lo detecte. Ese c\u00f3digo tendr\u00eda los privilegios del proceso Java que ejecuta Brooklyn, incluida la capacidad de abrir archivos y conexiones de red y ejecutar comandos del sistema. Se sabe que existe un exploit a modo de prueba de concepto que utiliza esta vulnerabilidad."
}
],
"id": "CVE-2016-8744",
"lastModified": "2026-06-17T00:54:56.237",
"metrics": {
"cvssMetricV2": [
{
"acInsufInfo": false,
"baseSeverity": "HIGH",
"cvssData": {
"accessComplexity": "LOW",
"accessVector": "NETWORK",
"authentication": "SINGLE",
"availabilityImpact": "COMPLETE",
"baseScore": 9.0,
"confidentialityImpact": "COMPLETE",
"integrityImpact": "COMPLETE",
"vectorString": "AV:N/AC:L/Au:S/C:C/I:C/A:C",
"version": "2.0"
},
"exploitabilityScore": 8.0,
"impactScore": 10.0,
"obtainAllPrivilege": false,
"obtainOtherPrivilege": false,
"obtainUserPrivilege": false,
"source": "nvd@nist.gov",
"type": "Primary",
"userInteractionRequired": false
}
],
"cvssMetricV30": [
{
"cvssData": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "HIGH",
"baseScore": 8.8,
"baseSeverity": "HIGH",
"confidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
"integrityImpact": "HIGH",
"privilegesRequired": "LOW",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"version": "3.0"
},
"exploitabilityScore": 2.8,
"impactScore": 5.9,
"source": "nvd@nist.gov",
"type": "Primary"
}
]
},
"published": "2017-09-13T16:29:00.400",
"references": [
{
"source": "security@apache.org",
"tags": [
"Exploit",
"Vendor Advisory"
],
"url": "https://brooklyn.apache.org/community/security/CVE-2016-8744.html"
},
{
"source": "security@apache.org",
"url": "https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/3f4d09c1c1a3cdfd1da0a05c8362769b917c078eed5b6c2f8e37a761%40%3Cdev.brooklyn.apache.org%3E"
},
{
"source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"tags": [
"Exploit",
"Vendor Advisory"
],
"url": "https://brooklyn.apache.org/community/security/CVE-2016-8744.html"
},
{
"source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"url": "https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/3f4d09c1c1a3cdfd1da0a05c8362769b917c078eed5b6c2f8e37a761%40%3Cdev.brooklyn.apache.org%3E"
}
],
"sourceIdentifier": "security@apache.org",
"vulnStatus": "Modified",
"weaknesses": [
{
"description": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "CWE-502"
}
],
"source": "nvd@nist.gov",
"type": "Primary"
}
]
}
Drag nodes to arrange them. Double-click a related vulnerability to open it, or a source to visit its link. The Physics button on the left tunes the layout and the simulation; the legend at the bottom left hides or shows nodes by kind and by sighting type.
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date | Other |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Vulnerability timeline
Sightings and recorded dates, grouped by day · UTC
How durations are calculated
Following the VTEM framework (Black Hat USA 2015), time to patch starts when the vendor or a coordinator was informed, total time to patch at discovery, and disclosure to patch at public disclosure; vendor response time runs from the report to its acknowledgement. Time to exploit and time unpatched start at the earliest discovery or report, falling back to public disclosure. Unpatched time ends at the first recorded patch, or the calculation time when no patch is recorded. Exploitation to patch shows the interval between those two events; a published proof of concept is a public exploit, not exploitation.
Each result shows its source dates. A negative interval means the end event came first; when date-only inputs leave the order open, the result says so. Date-only inputs are approximate. The earliest evidence wins: KEV report dates and sightings are labelled as such. Records describing another vulnerability are listed but never calculated from, and a PoC alone does not establish exploitation. Missing patch evidence does not prove that no patch exists. Filters below change the event list only.
Loading timeline…
The approach is described in our paper Mapping CVEs to MITRE ATT&CK Techniques: A Curated Gold-Set Classifier and the Limits of LLM-Assisted Label Expansion.
Browse all ATT&CK techniques and the vulnerabilities related to each.
Related by attack behaviour
Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.