FKIE_CVE-2016-6148

Vulnerability from fkie_nvd - Published: 2016-08-05 14:59 - Updated: 2026-06-17 00:50
Severity
7.5 (High) - CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Summary
SAP HANA DB 1.00.73.00.389160 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (process termination) or execute arbitrary code via vectors related to an IMPORT statement, aka SAP Security Note 2233136.
References
cve@mitre.orghttp://packetstormsecurity.com/files/138450/SAP-HANA-DB-1.00.73.00.389160-Remote-Code-Execution.html
cve@mitre.orghttp://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/2016/Aug/95
cve@mitre.orghttp://www.securityfocus.com/bid/92067Third Party Advisory, VDB Entry
cve@mitre.orghttps://layersevensecurity.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/02/Layer-Seven-Security_SAP-Security-Notes_January-2016.pdfTechnical Description
cve@mitre.orghttps://www.onapsis.com/blog/analyzing-sap-security-notes-january-2016Third Party Advisory
af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108http://packetstormsecurity.com/files/138450/SAP-HANA-DB-1.00.73.00.389160-Remote-Code-Execution.html
af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108http://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/2016/Aug/95
af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/92067Third Party Advisory, VDB Entry
af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108https://layersevensecurity.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/02/Layer-Seven-Security_SAP-Security-Notes_January-2016.pdfTechnical Description
af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108https://www.onapsis.com/blog/analyzing-sap-security-notes-january-2016Third Party Advisory
Impacted products
Vendor Product Version
sap hana 1.00.73.00.389160
To clipboard 

{
  "affected": [
    {
      "affectedData": [
        {
          "product": "n/a",
          "vendor": "n/a",
          "versions": [
            {
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "n/a"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "source": "cve@mitre.org"
    }
  ],
  "configurations": [
    {
      "nodes": [
        {
          "cpeMatch": [
            {
              "criteria": "cpe:2.3:a:sap:hana:1.00.73.00.389160:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
              "matchCriteriaId": "839E6AE8-912B-4C81-9E96-1F2190A0B673",
              "vulnerable": true
            }
          ],
          "negate": false,
          "operator": "OR"
        }
      ]
    }
  ],
  "cveTags": [],
  "descriptions": [
    {
      "lang": "en",
      "value": "SAP HANA DB 1.00.73.00.389160 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (process termination) or execute arbitrary code via vectors related to an IMPORT statement, aka SAP Security Note 2233136."
    },
    {
      "lang": "es",
      "value": "SAP HANA DB 1.00.73.00.389160 permite a atacantes remotos provocar una denegaci\u00f3n de servicio (terminaci\u00f3n de proceso) o ejecutar c\u00f3digo arbitrario a trav\u00e9s de vectores relacionados con una declaraci\u00f3n IMPORT, tambi\u00e9n conocido como SAP Security Note 2233136."
    }
  ],
  "id": "CVE-2016-6148",
  "lastModified": "2026-06-17T00:50:32.273",
  "metrics": {
    "cvssMetricV2": [
      {
        "acInsufInfo": false,
        "baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
        "cvssData": {
          "accessComplexity": "LOW",
          "accessVector": "NETWORK",
          "authentication": "NONE",
          "availabilityImpact": "PARTIAL",
          "baseScore": 5.0,
          "confidentialityImpact": "NONE",
          "integrityImpact": "NONE",
          "vectorString": "AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:N/A:P",
          "version": "2.0"
        },
        "exploitabilityScore": 10.0,
        "impactScore": 2.9,
        "obtainAllPrivilege": false,
        "obtainOtherPrivilege": false,
        "obtainUserPrivilege": false,
        "source": "nvd@nist.gov",
        "type": "Primary",
        "userInteractionRequired": false
      }
    ],
    "cvssMetricV30": [
      {
        "cvssData": {
          "attackComplexity": "LOW",
          "attackVector": "NETWORK",
          "availabilityImpact": "HIGH",
          "baseScore": 7.5,
          "baseSeverity": "HIGH",
          "confidentialityImpact": "NONE",
          "integrityImpact": "NONE",
          "privilegesRequired": "NONE",
          "scope": "UNCHANGED",
          "userInteraction": "NONE",
          "vectorString": "CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H",
          "version": "3.0"
        },
        "exploitabilityScore": 3.9,
        "impactScore": 3.6,
        "source": "nvd@nist.gov",
        "type": "Primary"
      }
    ]
  },
  "published": "2016-08-05T14:59:20.767",
  "references": [
    {
      "source": "cve@mitre.org",
      "url": "http://packetstormsecurity.com/files/138450/SAP-HANA-DB-1.00.73.00.389160-Remote-Code-Execution.html"
    },
    {
      "source": "cve@mitre.org",
      "url": "http://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/2016/Aug/95"
    },
    {
      "source": "cve@mitre.org",
      "tags": [
        "Third Party Advisory",
        "VDB Entry"
      ],
      "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/92067"
    },
    {
      "source": "cve@mitre.org",
      "tags": [
        "Technical Description"
      ],
      "url": "https://layersevensecurity.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/02/Layer-Seven-Security_SAP-Security-Notes_January-2016.pdf"
    },
    {
      "source": "cve@mitre.org",
      "tags": [
        "Third Party Advisory"
      ],
      "url": "https://www.onapsis.com/blog/analyzing-sap-security-notes-january-2016"
    },
    {
      "source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
      "url": "http://packetstormsecurity.com/files/138450/SAP-HANA-DB-1.00.73.00.389160-Remote-Code-Execution.html"
    },
    {
      "source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
      "url": "http://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/2016/Aug/95"
    },
    {
      "source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
      "tags": [
        "Third Party Advisory",
        "VDB Entry"
      ],
      "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/92067"
    },
    {
      "source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
      "tags": [
        "Technical Description"
      ],
      "url": "https://layersevensecurity.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/02/Layer-Seven-Security_SAP-Security-Notes_January-2016.pdf"
    },
    {
      "source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
      "tags": [
        "Third Party Advisory"
      ],
      "url": "https://www.onapsis.com/blog/analyzing-sap-security-notes-january-2016"
    }
  ],
  "sourceIdentifier": "cve@mitre.org",
  "vulnStatus": "Modified",
  "weaknesses": [
    {
      "description": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "value": "CWE-20"
        }
      ],
      "source": "nvd@nist.gov",
      "type": "Primary"
    }
  ]
}



Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.




Drag nodes to arrange them. Double-click a related vulnerability to open it, or a source to visit its link. The Physics button on the left tunes the layout and the simulation; the legend at the bottom left hides or shows nodes by kind and by sighting type.

Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Vulnerability timeline

Sightings and recorded dates, grouped by day · UTC

JSON

Loading timeline…




    Related by attack behaviour

    Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.