FKIE_CVE-2015-6541

Vulnerability from fkie_nvd - Published: 2016-04-08 14:59 - Updated: 2026-06-17 00:31
Severity
8.8 (High) - CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Summary
Multiple cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerabilities in the Mail interface in Zimbra Collaboration Server (ZCS) before 8.5 allow remote attackers to hijack the authentication of arbitrary users for requests that change account preferences via a SOAP request to service/soap/BatchRequest.
References
cve@mitre.orghttp://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/2016/Feb/121
cve@mitre.orghttps://wiki.zimbra.com/wiki/Security/Collab/86#Notes_from_8.5_.28Jetty.29
cve@mitre.orghttps://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/39500/Exploit
af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108http://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/2016/Feb/121
af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108https://wiki.zimbra.com/wiki/Security/Collab/86#Notes_from_8.5_.28Jetty.29
af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108https://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/39500/Exploit
Impacted products
Vendor Product Version
zimbra zimbra_collaboration_server *
To clipboard 

{
  "affected": [
    {
      "affectedData": [
        {
          "product": "n/a",
          "vendor": "n/a",
          "versions": [
            {
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "n/a"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "source": "cve@mitre.org"
    }
  ],
  "configurations": [
    {
      "nodes": [
        {
          "cpeMatch": [
            {
              "criteria": "cpe:2.3:a:zimbra:zimbra_collaboration_server:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
              "matchCriteriaId": "C70BEF27-1504-4B4D-A054-EB3E5CC02FEA",
              "versionEndIncluding": "8.0.9",
              "vulnerable": true
            }
          ],
          "negate": false,
          "operator": "OR"
        }
      ]
    }
  ],
  "cveTags": [],
  "descriptions": [
    {
      "lang": "en",
      "value": "Multiple cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerabilities in the Mail interface in Zimbra Collaboration Server (ZCS) before 8.5 allow remote attackers to hijack the authentication of arbitrary users for requests that change account preferences via a SOAP request to service/soap/BatchRequest."
    },
    {
      "lang": "es",
      "value": "M\u00faltiples vulnerabilidades de CSRF en la inerfaz Mail en Zimbra Collaboration Server (ZCS) en versiones anteriores a 8.5 permiten a atacantes remotos secuestrar la autenticaci\u00f3n de usuarios arbitrarios para peticiones que cambian preferencias de cuenta a trav\u00e9s de una petici\u00f3n SOAP a service/soap/BatchRequest."
    }
  ],
  "id": "CVE-2015-6541",
  "lastModified": "2026-06-17T00:31:02.193",
  "metrics": {
    "cvssMetricV2": [
      {
        "acInsufInfo": false,
        "baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
        "cvssData": {
          "accessComplexity": "MEDIUM",
          "accessVector": "NETWORK",
          "authentication": "NONE",
          "availabilityImpact": "PARTIAL",
          "baseScore": 6.8,
          "confidentialityImpact": "PARTIAL",
          "integrityImpact": "PARTIAL",
          "vectorString": "AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:P",
          "version": "2.0"
        },
        "exploitabilityScore": 8.6,
        "impactScore": 6.4,
        "obtainAllPrivilege": false,
        "obtainOtherPrivilege": false,
        "obtainUserPrivilege": false,
        "source": "nvd@nist.gov",
        "type": "Primary",
        "userInteractionRequired": true
      }
    ],
    "cvssMetricV30": [
      {
        "cvssData": {
          "attackComplexity": "LOW",
          "attackVector": "NETWORK",
          "availabilityImpact": "HIGH",
          "baseScore": 8.8,
          "baseSeverity": "HIGH",
          "confidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
          "integrityImpact": "HIGH",
          "privilegesRequired": "NONE",
          "scope": "UNCHANGED",
          "userInteraction": "REQUIRED",
          "vectorString": "CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
          "version": "3.0"
        },
        "exploitabilityScore": 2.8,
        "impactScore": 5.9,
        "source": "nvd@nist.gov",
        "type": "Primary"
      }
    ]
  },
  "published": "2016-04-08T14:59:00.157",
  "references": [
    {
      "source": "cve@mitre.org",
      "url": "http://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/2016/Feb/121"
    },
    {
      "source": "cve@mitre.org",
      "url": "https://wiki.zimbra.com/wiki/Security/Collab/86#Notes_from_8.5_.28Jetty.29"
    },
    {
      "source": "cve@mitre.org",
      "tags": [
        "Exploit"
      ],
      "url": "https://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/39500/"
    },
    {
      "source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
      "url": "http://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/2016/Feb/121"
    },
    {
      "source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
      "url": "https://wiki.zimbra.com/wiki/Security/Collab/86#Notes_from_8.5_.28Jetty.29"
    },
    {
      "source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
      "tags": [
        "Exploit"
      ],
      "url": "https://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/39500/"
    }
  ],
  "sourceIdentifier": "cve@mitre.org",
  "vulnStatus": "Modified",
  "weaknesses": [
    {
      "description": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "value": "CWE-352"
        }
      ],
      "source": "nvd@nist.gov",
      "type": "Primary"
    }
  ]
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.





Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.


Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.