FKIE_CVE-2015-6254
Vulnerability from fkie_nvd - Published: 2015-08-17 20:59 - Updated: 2026-06-17 00:30
Severity
Summary
The (1) Service Provider (SP) and (2) Identity Provider (IdP) in PicketLink before 2.7.0 does not ensure that the Destination attribute in a Response element in a SAML assertion matches the location from which the message was received, which allows remote attackers to have unspecified impact via unknown vectors. NOTE: this identifier was SPLIT from CVE-2015-0277 per ADT2 due to different vulnerability types.
References
Impacted products
| Vendor | Product | Version | |
|---|---|---|---|
| picketlink | picketlink | * |
{
"affected": [
{
"affectedData": [
{
"product": "n/a",
"vendor": "n/a",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "n/a"
}
]
}
],
"source": "cve@mitre.org"
}
],
"configurations": [
{
"nodes": [
{
"cpeMatch": [
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:a:picketlink:picketlink:*:cr5:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "570FB892-EA67-4E76-A218-DF3398C47814",
"versionEndIncluding": "2.6.0",
"vulnerable": true
}
],
"negate": false,
"operator": "OR"
}
]
}
],
"cveTags": [],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "The (1) Service Provider (SP) and (2) Identity Provider (IdP) in PicketLink before 2.7.0 does not ensure that the Destination attribute in a Response element in a SAML assertion matches the location from which the message was received, which allows remote attackers to have unspecified impact via unknown vectors. NOTE: this identifier was SPLIT from CVE-2015-0277 per ADT2 due to different vulnerability types."
},
{
"lang": "es",
"value": "Vulnerabilidad en el (1) Proveedor de Servicio (SP) y (2) Proveedor de Identidad (IdP) en PicketLink en versiones anteriores a 2.7.0, no asegura que el atributo Destination en un elemento Response en una aserci\u00f3n SAML coincida con la ubicaci\u00f3n desde la que se recibi\u00f3 el mensaje, lo que permite a atacantes remotos tener un impacto no especificado a trav\u00e9s de vectores desconocidos. NOTA: este identificador fue SEPARADO de CVE-205-0277 por ADT2 debido a los diferentes tipos de vulnerabilidad."
}
],
"id": "CVE-2015-6254",
"lastModified": "2026-06-17T00:30:34.983",
"metrics": {
"cvssMetricV2": [
{
"acInsufInfo": false,
"baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
"cvssData": {
"accessComplexity": "MEDIUM",
"accessVector": "NETWORK",
"authentication": "SINGLE",
"availabilityImpact": "PARTIAL",
"baseScore": 6.0,
"confidentialityImpact": "PARTIAL",
"integrityImpact": "PARTIAL",
"vectorString": "AV:N/AC:M/Au:S/C:P/I:P/A:P",
"version": "2.0"
},
"exploitabilityScore": 6.8,
"impactScore": 6.4,
"obtainAllPrivilege": false,
"obtainOtherPrivilege": false,
"obtainUserPrivilege": false,
"source": "nvd@nist.gov",
"type": "Primary",
"userInteractionRequired": false
}
]
},
"published": "2015-08-17T20:59:01.763",
"references": [
{
"source": "cve@mitre.org",
"url": "http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2015-0846.html"
},
{
"source": "cve@mitre.org",
"url": "http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2015-0847.html"
},
{
"source": "cve@mitre.org",
"url": "http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2015-0848.html"
},
{
"source": "cve@mitre.org",
"url": "http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2015-0849.html"
},
{
"source": "cve@mitre.org",
"url": "https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1194832"
},
{
"source": "cve@mitre.org",
"url": "https://issues.jboss.org/browse/PLINK-680"
},
{
"source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"url": "http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2015-0846.html"
},
{
"source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"url": "http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2015-0847.html"
},
{
"source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"url": "http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2015-0848.html"
},
{
"source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"url": "http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2015-0849.html"
},
{
"source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"url": "https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1194832"
},
{
"source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"url": "https://issues.jboss.org/browse/PLINK-680"
}
],
"sourceIdentifier": "cve@mitre.org",
"vulnStatus": "Modified",
"weaknesses": [
{
"description": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "CWE-17"
}
],
"source": "nvd@nist.gov",
"type": "Primary"
}
]
}
Loading…
Loading…
Experimental. This forecast is provided for visualization only and may change without notice. Do not use it for operational decisions.
Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date | Other |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Loading…
The MITRE ATT&CK techniques below are AI-generated suggestions, inferred from the description of the
vulnerability by the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-classification-roberta-base
model, served locally by ML-Gateway.
They have not been verified by an analyst and are provided for guidance only.
The approach is described in our paper Mapping CVEs to MITRE ATT&CK Techniques: A Curated Gold-Set Classifier and the Limits of LLM-Assisted Label Expansion.
Browse all ATT&CK techniques and the vulnerabilities related to each.
The approach is described in our paper Mapping CVEs to MITRE ATT&CK Techniques: A Curated Gold-Set Classifier and the Limits of LLM-Assisted Label Expansion.
Browse all ATT&CK techniques and the vulnerabilities related to each.
Loading…
Related by attack behaviour
Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.
Loading…