FKIE_CVE-2015-4550
Vulnerability from fkie_nvd - Published: 2015-06-17 10:59 - Updated: 2025-04-12 10:46
Severity ?
Summary
The Cavium cryptographic-module firmware on Cisco Adaptive Security Appliance (ASA) devices with software 9.3(3) and 9.4(1.1) does not verify the AES-GCM Integrity Check Value (ICV) octets, which makes it easier for man-in-the-middle attackers to spoof IPSec and IKEv2 traffic by modifying packet data, aka Bug ID CSCuu66218.
References
Impacted products
| Vendor | Product | Version | |
|---|---|---|---|
| cisco | adaptive_security_appliance_software | 9.3\(3\) | |
| cisco | adaptive_security_appliance_software | 9.4\(1.1\) |
{
"configurations": [
{
"nodes": [
{
"cpeMatch": [
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:cisco:adaptive_security_appliance_software:9.3\\(3\\):*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "63FECF84-4FFB-443E-8529-A1FA4D1D821C",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:cisco:adaptive_security_appliance_software:9.4\\(1.1\\):*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "E04C0569-6E1B-4F41-92B9-D024E401E679",
"vulnerable": true
}
],
"negate": false,
"operator": "OR"
}
]
}
],
"cveTags": [],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "The Cavium cryptographic-module firmware on Cisco Adaptive Security Appliance (ASA) devices with software 9.3(3) and 9.4(1.1) does not verify the AES-GCM Integrity Check Value (ICV) octets, which makes it easier for man-in-the-middle attackers to spoof IPSec and IKEv2 traffic by modifying packet data, aka Bug ID CSCuu66218."
},
{
"lang": "es",
"value": "El firmware del m\u00f3dulo criptogr\u00e1fico Cavium en los dispositivos Cisco Adaptive Security Appliance (ASA) con software 9.3(3) y 9.4(1.1) no verifica los octetos AES-GCM Integrity Check Value (ICV), lo que facilita a atacantes man-in-the-middle falsificar trafico IPSec e IKEv2 mediante la modificaci\u00f3n de datos de paquetes, tambi\u00e9n conocido como Bug ID CSCuu66218."
}
],
"id": "CVE-2015-4550",
"lastModified": "2025-04-12T10:46:40.837",
"metrics": {
"cvssMetricV2": [
{
"acInsufInfo": false,
"baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
"cvssData": {
"accessComplexity": "MEDIUM",
"accessVector": "NETWORK",
"authentication": "NONE",
"availabilityImpact": "NONE",
"baseScore": 4.3,
"confidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"integrityImpact": "PARTIAL",
"vectorString": "AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:N",
"version": "2.0"
},
"exploitabilityScore": 8.6,
"impactScore": 2.9,
"obtainAllPrivilege": false,
"obtainOtherPrivilege": false,
"obtainUserPrivilege": false,
"source": "nvd@nist.gov",
"type": "Primary",
"userInteractionRequired": false
}
]
},
"published": "2015-06-17T10:59:07.727",
"references": [
{
"source": "cve@mitre.org",
"tags": [
"Vendor Advisory"
],
"url": "http://tools.cisco.com/security/center/viewAlert.x?alertId=39366"
},
{
"source": "cve@mitre.org",
"url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/75269"
},
{
"source": "cve@mitre.org",
"url": "http://www.securitytracker.com/id/1032595"
},
{
"source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"tags": [
"Vendor Advisory"
],
"url": "http://tools.cisco.com/security/center/viewAlert.x?alertId=39366"
},
{
"source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/75269"
},
{
"source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"url": "http://www.securitytracker.com/id/1032595"
}
],
"sourceIdentifier": "cve@mitre.org",
"vulnStatus": "Deferred",
"weaknesses": [
{
"description": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "CWE-310"
}
],
"source": "nvd@nist.gov",
"type": "Primary"
}
]
}
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…