FKIE_CVE-2013-3704

Vulnerability from fkie_nvd - Published: 2013-10-28 22:55 - Updated: 2026-06-16 23:55
Severity
Summary
The RPM GPG key import and handling feature in libzypp 12.15.0 and earlier reports a different key fingerprint than the one used to sign a repository when multiple key blobs are used, which might allow remote attackers to trick users into believing that the repository was signed by a more-trustworthy key.
References
cve@mitre.orghttp://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-updates/2013-09/msg00022.html
cve@mitre.orghttp://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-updates/2013-09/msg00023.html
af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-updates/2013-09/msg00022.html
af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-updates/2013-09/msg00023.html
Impacted products
Vendor Product Version
novell libzypp *
novell libzypp 11.2
novell libzypp 11.3
novell libzypp 11.4
novell libzypp 12.1
novell libzypp 12.2
novell libzypp 12.3
To clipboard 

{
  "affected": [
    {
      "affectedData": [
        {
          "product": "n/a",
          "vendor": "n/a",
          "versions": [
            {
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "n/a"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "source": "cve@mitre.org"
    }
  ],
  "configurations": [
    {
      "nodes": [
        {
          "cpeMatch": [
            {
              "criteria": "cpe:2.3:a:novell:libzypp:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
              "matchCriteriaId": "2125BEAC-C543-4EDE-8A43-013227300A1D",
              "versionEndIncluding": "12.15.0",
              "vulnerable": true
            },
            {
              "criteria": "cpe:2.3:a:novell:libzypp:11.2:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
              "matchCriteriaId": "46DAB6B0-DF15-43CF-BBD0-ED13BE6A5D54",
              "vulnerable": true
            },
            {
              "criteria": "cpe:2.3:a:novell:libzypp:11.3:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
              "matchCriteriaId": "E60F5E43-3EAE-4A0F-94D6-45C61CA69C0A",
              "vulnerable": true
            },
            {
              "criteria": "cpe:2.3:a:novell:libzypp:11.4:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
              "matchCriteriaId": "A7D71BA5-E897-4142-98CE-858067535335",
              "vulnerable": true
            },
            {
              "criteria": "cpe:2.3:a:novell:libzypp:12.1:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
              "matchCriteriaId": "5EF53403-2B93-4E10-9C4F-1C8638DB2622",
              "vulnerable": true
            },
            {
              "criteria": "cpe:2.3:a:novell:libzypp:12.2:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
              "matchCriteriaId": "1E8B87B3-EB9B-4904-9584-6ECAC1FA7E7F",
              "vulnerable": true
            },
            {
              "criteria": "cpe:2.3:a:novell:libzypp:12.3:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
              "matchCriteriaId": "6EB57E82-BEBC-4970-AAF9-5DEFE7B9E6D7",
              "vulnerable": true
            }
          ],
          "negate": false,
          "operator": "OR"
        }
      ]
    }
  ],
  "cveTags": [],
  "descriptions": [
    {
      "lang": "en",
      "value": "The RPM GPG key import and handling feature in libzypp 12.15.0 and earlier reports a different key fingerprint than the one used to sign a repository when multiple key blobs are used, which might allow remote attackers to trick users into believing that the repository was signed by a more-trustworthy key."
    },
    {
      "lang": "es",
      "value": "La funcionalidad de importaci\u00f3n y manejo de claves RPM GPG en libzypp 12.15.0 y anteriores reporta una huella de clave diferente de la utilizada para firmar un repositorio cuando m\u00faltiples \"blobs\" de claves son usados, lo cual podr\u00eda permitir a atacantes remotos hacer creer a los usuarios que el repositorio fue firmado por una clave con mayor confianza."
    }
  ],
  "id": "CVE-2013-3704",
  "lastModified": "2026-06-16T23:55:39.280",
  "metrics": {
    "cvssMetricV2": [
      {
        "acInsufInfo": false,
        "baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
        "cvssData": {
          "accessComplexity": "MEDIUM",
          "accessVector": "NETWORK",
          "authentication": "NONE",
          "availabilityImpact": "NONE",
          "baseScore": 4.3,
          "confidentialityImpact": "NONE",
          "integrityImpact": "PARTIAL",
          "vectorString": "AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:N",
          "version": "2.0"
        },
        "exploitabilityScore": 8.6,
        "impactScore": 2.9,
        "obtainAllPrivilege": false,
        "obtainOtherPrivilege": false,
        "obtainUserPrivilege": false,
        "source": "nvd@nist.gov",
        "type": "Primary",
        "userInteractionRequired": false
      }
    ]
  },
  "published": "2013-10-28T22:55:03.693",
  "references": [
    {
      "source": "cve@mitre.org",
      "url": "http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-updates/2013-09/msg00022.html"
    },
    {
      "source": "cve@mitre.org",
      "url": "http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-updates/2013-09/msg00023.html"
    },
    {
      "source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
      "url": "http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-updates/2013-09/msg00022.html"
    },
    {
      "source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
      "url": "http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-updates/2013-09/msg00023.html"
    }
  ],
  "sourceIdentifier": "cve@mitre.org",
  "vulnStatus": "Modified",
  "weaknesses": [
    {
      "description": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "value": "CWE-310"
        }
      ],
      "source": "nvd@nist.gov",
      "type": "Primary"
    }
  ]
}



Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.





Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.


Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.