FKIE_CVE-2013-3397

Vulnerability from fkie_nvd - Published: 2013-06-26 21:55 - Updated: 2026-06-16 23:55
Severity
Summary
Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in the Unified Serviceability component in Cisco Unified Communications Manager (CUCM) allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of arbitrary users for requests that perform Unified Serviceability actions, aka Bug ID CSCuh10298.
Impacted products
Vendor Product Version
cisco unified_communications_manager *

{
  "affected": [
    {
      "affectedData": [
        {
          "product": "n/a",
          "vendor": "n/a",
          "versions": [
            {
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "n/a"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "source": "psirt@cisco.com"
    }
  ],
  "configurations": [
    {
      "nodes": [
        {
          "cpeMatch": [
            {
              "criteria": "cpe:2.3:a:cisco:unified_communications_manager:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
              "matchCriteriaId": "8D51B262-3855-4384-A0EA-FE115D544953",
              "vulnerable": true
            }
          ],
          "negate": false,
          "operator": "OR"
        }
      ]
    }
  ],
  "cveTags": [],
  "descriptions": [
    {
      "lang": "en",
      "value": "Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in the Unified Serviceability component in Cisco Unified Communications Manager (CUCM) allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of arbitrary users for requests that perform Unified Serviceability actions, aka Bug ID CSCuh10298."
    },
    {
      "lang": "es",
      "value": "Vulnerabilidad CSRF en el componente Unified Serviceability en Cisco Unified Communications Manager (CUCM), permite a atacantes remotos secuestrar la autenticaci\u00f3n de usuarios arbitrarios para peticiones re realizan acciones del tipo \"Unified Serviceability\". Aka Bug ID CSCuh10298."
    }
  ],
  "id": "CVE-2013-3397",
  "lastModified": "2026-06-16T23:55:01.263",
  "metrics": {
    "cvssMetricV2": [
      {
        "acInsufInfo": false,
        "baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
        "cvssData": {
          "accessComplexity": "MEDIUM",
          "accessVector": "NETWORK",
          "authentication": "NONE",
          "availabilityImpact": "PARTIAL",
          "baseScore": 6.8,
          "confidentialityImpact": "PARTIAL",
          "integrityImpact": "PARTIAL",
          "vectorString": "AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:P",
          "version": "2.0"
        },
        "exploitabilityScore": 8.6,
        "impactScore": 6.4,
        "obtainAllPrivilege": false,
        "obtainOtherPrivilege": false,
        "obtainUserPrivilege": false,
        "source": "nvd@nist.gov",
        "type": "Primary",
        "userInteractionRequired": true
      }
    ]
  },
  "published": "2013-06-26T21:55:04.333",
  "references": [
    {
      "source": "psirt@cisco.com",
      "tags": [
        "Vendor Advisory"
      ],
      "url": "http://tools.cisco.com/security/center/content/CiscoSecurityNotice/CVE-2013-3397"
    },
    {
      "source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
      "tags": [
        "Vendor Advisory"
      ],
      "url": "http://tools.cisco.com/security/center/content/CiscoSecurityNotice/CVE-2013-3397"
    }
  ],
  "sourceIdentifier": "psirt@cisco.com",
  "vulnStatus": "Modified",
  "weaknesses": [
    {
      "description": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "value": "CWE-352"
        }
      ],
      "source": "nvd@nist.gov",
      "type": "Primary"
    }
  ]
}



Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.

Loading…

Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.

Loading…

Loading…