FKIE_CVE-2012-6580
Vulnerability from fkie_nvd - Published: 2013-07-24 12:01 - Updated: 2026-06-16 23:48
Severity
Summary
Best Practical Solutions RT 3.8.x before 3.8.15 and 4.0.x before 4.0.8, when GnuPG is enabled, does not ensure that the UI labels unencrypted messages as unencrypted, which might make it easier for remote attackers to spoof details of a message's origin or interfere with encryption-policy auditing via an e-mail message to a queue's address.
References
| URL | Tags | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| cve@mitre.org | http://lists.bestpractical.com/pipermail/rt-announce/2012-October/000212.html | Patch, Vendor Advisory | |
| af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108 | http://lists.bestpractical.com/pipermail/rt-announce/2012-October/000212.html | Patch, Vendor Advisory |
Impacted products
| Vendor | Product | Version | |
|---|---|---|---|
| bestpractical | request_tracker | 3.8.3 | |
| bestpractical | request_tracker | 3.8.4 | |
| bestpractical | request_tracker | 3.8.7 | |
| bestpractical | request_tracker | 3.8.9 | |
| bestpractical | request_tracker | 3.8.10 | |
| bestpractical | request_tracker | 3.8.11 | |
| bestpractical | request_tracker | 3.8.12 | |
| bestpractical | request_tracker | 3.8.13 | |
| bestpractical | request_tracker | 3.8.14 | |
| bestpractical | request_tracker | 4.0.0 | |
| bestpractical | request_tracker | 4.0.1 | |
| bestpractical | request_tracker | 4.0.2 | |
| bestpractical | request_tracker | 4.0.3 | |
| bestpractical | request_tracker | 4.0.4 | |
| bestpractical | request_tracker | 4.0.5 | |
| bestpractical | request_tracker | 4.0.6 | |
| bestpractical | request_tracker | 4.0.7 |
{
"affected": [
{
"affectedData": [
{
"product": "n/a",
"vendor": "n/a",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "n/a"
}
]
}
],
"source": "cve@mitre.org"
}
],
"configurations": [
{
"nodes": [
{
"cpeMatch": [
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:a:bestpractical:request_tracker:3.8.3:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "E751355A-5C27-47D5-A501-BE0033BB8E06",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:a:bestpractical:request_tracker:3.8.4:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "FB660C2B-9EAB-45E7-83D4-C61B71A70704",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:a:bestpractical:request_tracker:3.8.7:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "6149929E-AC54-484C-9914-BE5B9011B6C2",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:a:bestpractical:request_tracker:3.8.9:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "96D2D87E-2C68-44F7-B8C5-922452742A4B",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:a:bestpractical:request_tracker:3.8.10:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "FDD49949-14EC-4023-8FC5-6BDC5EC64991",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:a:bestpractical:request_tracker:3.8.11:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "8BF47625-80E7-4B73-8C93-8E022AC2703B",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:a:bestpractical:request_tracker:3.8.12:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "C24F467B-2654-4ED4-B1C9-66BE6D263C72",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:a:bestpractical:request_tracker:3.8.13:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "5947B639-9DA1-401A-A227-31A065B4C1A7",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:a:bestpractical:request_tracker:3.8.14:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "E53B005E-8714-4E5D-B026-E22C7FA6DCEA",
"vulnerable": true
}
],
"negate": false,
"operator": "OR"
}
]
},
{
"nodes": [
{
"cpeMatch": [
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:a:bestpractical:request_tracker:4.0.0:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "44234832-170D-43E0-9643-19CE57378721",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:a:bestpractical:request_tracker:4.0.1:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "38CFCCD6-6C5D-41CD-B7FB-D925A46E615C",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:a:bestpractical:request_tracker:4.0.2:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "814172FB-6F34-4356-8105-70AEBE0B6F6B",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:a:bestpractical:request_tracker:4.0.3:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "D282AC9F-E087-4D8D-B467-1D9480B3ABDA",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:a:bestpractical:request_tracker:4.0.4:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "42F21EB3-8CE6-4F87-A5DE-A01AA32B943F",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:a:bestpractical:request_tracker:4.0.5:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "5EDB4AD7-96B5-4D72-8C51-23D744D10C46",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:a:bestpractical:request_tracker:4.0.6:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "0096B700-17B5-4158-A736-ECFDF9E9935B",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:a:bestpractical:request_tracker:4.0.7:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "A0AF4515-6DB1-406A-878C-6DB32D021BA0",
"vulnerable": true
}
],
"negate": false,
"operator": "OR"
}
]
}
],
"cveTags": [],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "Best Practical Solutions RT 3.8.x before 3.8.15 and 4.0.x before 4.0.8, when GnuPG is enabled, does not ensure that the UI labels unencrypted messages as unencrypted, which might make it easier for remote attackers to spoof details of a message\u0027s origin or interfere with encryption-policy auditing via an e-mail message to a queue\u0027s address."
},
{
"lang": "es",
"value": "Best Practical Solutions RT 3.8.x anterior a 3.8.15 y 4.0.x anterior a 4.0.8, cuando GnuPG est\u00e1 activado, no se asegura que las etiquetas UI descifradas se encuentren en este estado, lo que podr\u00eda facilitar a atacantes remotos suplantar los detalles del origen del mensaje o interferir con la auditor\u00eda de pol\u00edtica de cifrado a trav\u00e9s de un mensaje hacia una cola de direcciones."
}
],
"id": "CVE-2012-6580",
"lastModified": "2026-06-16T23:48:24.850",
"metrics": {
"cvssMetricV2": [
{
"acInsufInfo": false,
"baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
"cvssData": {
"accessComplexity": "MEDIUM",
"accessVector": "NETWORK",
"authentication": "NONE",
"availabilityImpact": "NONE",
"baseScore": 4.3,
"confidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"integrityImpact": "PARTIAL",
"vectorString": "AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:N",
"version": "2.0"
},
"exploitabilityScore": 8.6,
"impactScore": 2.9,
"obtainAllPrivilege": false,
"obtainOtherPrivilege": false,
"obtainUserPrivilege": false,
"source": "nvd@nist.gov",
"type": "Primary",
"userInteractionRequired": false
}
]
},
"published": "2013-07-24T12:01:45.100",
"references": [
{
"source": "cve@mitre.org",
"tags": [
"Patch",
"Vendor Advisory"
],
"url": "http://lists.bestpractical.com/pipermail/rt-announce/2012-October/000212.html"
},
{
"source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"tags": [
"Patch",
"Vendor Advisory"
],
"url": "http://lists.bestpractical.com/pipermail/rt-announce/2012-October/000212.html"
}
],
"sourceIdentifier": "cve@mitre.org",
"vulnStatus": "Modified",
"weaknesses": [
{
"description": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "CWE-310"
}
],
"source": "nvd@nist.gov",
"type": "Primary"
}
]
}
Loading…
Loading…
Experimental. This forecast is provided for visualization only and may change without notice. Do not use it for operational decisions.
Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date | Other |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Loading…
The MITRE ATT&CK techniques below are AI-generated suggestions, inferred from the description of the
vulnerability by the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-classification-roberta-base
model, served locally by ML-Gateway.
They have not been verified by an analyst and are provided for guidance only.
The approach is described in our paper Mapping CVEs to MITRE ATT&CK Techniques: A Curated Gold-Set Classifier and the Limits of LLM-Assisted Label Expansion.
The approach is described in our paper Mapping CVEs to MITRE ATT&CK Techniques: A Curated Gold-Set Classifier and the Limits of LLM-Assisted Label Expansion.
Loading…
Loading…