FKIE_CVE-2012-6051
Vulnerability from fkie_nvd - Published: 2012-11-28 13:03 - Updated: 2026-06-16 23:47
Severity
Summary
Google CityHash computes hash values without properly restricting the ability to trigger hash collisions predictably, which allows context-dependent attackers to cause a denial of service (CPU consumption) via crafted input to an application that maintains a hash table, as demonstrated by a universal multicollision attack.
References
{
"affected": [
{
"affectedData": [
{
"product": "n/a",
"vendor": "n/a",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "n/a"
}
]
}
],
"source": "cve@mitre.org"
}
],
"configurations": [
{
"nodes": [
{
"cpeMatch": [
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:a:google:cityhash:-:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "E0CA7867-026D-4CB8-9241-4DE523E642D6",
"vulnerable": true
}
],
"negate": false,
"operator": "OR"
}
]
}
],
"cveTags": [],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "Google CityHash computes hash values without properly restricting the ability to trigger hash collisions predictably, which allows context-dependent attackers to cause a denial of service (CPU consumption) via crafted input to an application that maintains a hash table, as demonstrated by a universal multicollision attack."
},
{
"lang": "es",
"value": "Google CityHash procesa valores hash sin restringir la posibilidad de producir colisiones previsibles, lo que permitir\u00eda a atacantes dependiendo del contexto provocar una denegaci\u00f3n de servicio (consumo de CPU) a trav\u00e9s de la manipulaci\u00f3n de una entrada a la aplicaci\u00f3n que mantiene la tabla de valores hash, como se demostr\u00f3 por el ataque universal multicolisi\u00f3n.\r\n"
}
],
"id": "CVE-2012-6051",
"lastModified": "2026-06-16T23:47:43.713",
"metrics": {
"cvssMetricV2": [
{
"acInsufInfo": false,
"baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
"cvssData": {
"accessComplexity": "LOW",
"accessVector": "NETWORK",
"authentication": "NONE",
"availabilityImpact": "PARTIAL",
"baseScore": 5.0,
"confidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"integrityImpact": "NONE",
"vectorString": "AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:N/A:P",
"version": "2.0"
},
"exploitabilityScore": 10.0,
"impactScore": 2.9,
"obtainAllPrivilege": false,
"obtainOtherPrivilege": false,
"obtainUserPrivilege": false,
"source": "nvd@nist.gov",
"type": "Primary",
"userInteractionRequired": false
}
]
},
"published": "2012-11-28T13:03:10.323",
"references": [
{
"source": "cve@mitre.org",
"url": "http://2012.appsec-forum.ch/conferences/#c17"
},
{
"source": "cve@mitre.org",
"url": "http://asfws12.files.wordpress.com/2012/11/asfws2012-jean_philippe_aumasson-martin_bosslet-hash_flooding_dos_reloaded.pdf"
},
{
"source": "cve@mitre.org",
"url": "http://code.google.com/p/cityhash/source/browse/trunk/NEWS"
},
{
"source": "cve@mitre.org",
"url": "https://www.131002.net/data/talks/appsec12_slides.pdf"
},
{
"source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"url": "http://2012.appsec-forum.ch/conferences/#c17"
},
{
"source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"url": "http://asfws12.files.wordpress.com/2012/11/asfws2012-jean_philippe_aumasson-martin_bosslet-hash_flooding_dos_reloaded.pdf"
},
{
"source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"url": "http://code.google.com/p/cityhash/source/browse/trunk/NEWS"
},
{
"source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"url": "https://www.131002.net/data/talks/appsec12_slides.pdf"
}
],
"sourceIdentifier": "cve@mitre.org",
"vulnStatus": "Modified",
"weaknesses": [
{
"description": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "CWE-310"
}
],
"source": "nvd@nist.gov",
"type": "Primary"
}
]
}
Loading…
Loading…
Experimental. This forecast is provided for visualization only and may change without notice. Do not use it for operational decisions.
Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date | Other |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…