FKIE_CVE-2012-2495

Vulnerability from fkie_nvd - Published: 2012-06-20 20:55 - Updated: 2026-06-16 23:41
Severity
Summary
The HostScan downloader implementation in Cisco AnyConnect Secure Mobility Client 3.x before 3.0 MR8 and Cisco Secure Desktop before 3.6.6020 does not compare the timestamp of offered software to the timestamp of installed software, which allows remote attackers to force a version downgrade by using (1) ActiveX or (2) Java components to offer signed code that corresponds to an older software release, aka Bug ID CSCtx74235.

{
  "affected": [
    {
      "affectedData": [
        {
          "product": "n/a",
          "vendor": "n/a",
          "versions": [
            {
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "n/a"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "source": "psirt@cisco.com"
    }
  ],
  "configurations": [
    {
      "nodes": [
        {
          "cpeMatch": [
            {
              "criteria": "cpe:2.3:a:cisco:anyconnect_secure_mobility_client:3.0:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
              "matchCriteriaId": "5F1A7236-46E3-487A-998B-4D72A5EEA004",
              "vulnerable": true
            },
            {
              "criteria": "cpe:2.3:a:cisco:secure_desktop:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
              "matchCriteriaId": "404A7711-C463-4471-A6BD-DD99B3795312",
              "versionEndIncluding": "3.5.2008",
              "vulnerable": true
            },
            {
              "criteria": "cpe:2.3:a:cisco:secure_desktop:3.1:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
              "matchCriteriaId": "6EE6B79A-FD31-4637-BE22-EEADF63B94FF",
              "vulnerable": true
            },
            {
              "criteria": "cpe:2.3:a:cisco:secure_desktop:3.1.1:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
              "matchCriteriaId": "7F2F8EA5-8DEF-48D0-9E7F-6047D4AECC5C",
              "vulnerable": true
            },
            {
              "criteria": "cpe:2.3:a:cisco:secure_desktop:3.1.1.27:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
              "matchCriteriaId": "59D841B0-3D1B-4F1C-87F1-D0355955E49C",
              "vulnerable": true
            },
            {
              "criteria": "cpe:2.3:a:cisco:secure_desktop:3.1.1.33:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
              "matchCriteriaId": "F13E414E-E56E-496E-A952-F93DCF1B1BDC",
              "vulnerable": true
            },
            {
              "criteria": "cpe:2.3:a:cisco:secure_desktop:3.1.1.45:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
              "matchCriteriaId": "21F5DFB0-21F4-45F7-B4AF-000B24DEA596",
              "vulnerable": true
            },
            {
              "criteria": "cpe:2.3:a:cisco:secure_desktop:3.2:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
              "matchCriteriaId": "0D7A8878-2E0F-4140-86DF-75999B47E4F5",
              "vulnerable": true
            },
            {
              "criteria": "cpe:2.3:a:cisco:secure_desktop:3.2.1:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
              "matchCriteriaId": "4932BA9E-4156-4445-93E9-7A9F1D81090B",
              "vulnerable": true
            },
            {
              "criteria": "cpe:2.3:a:cisco:secure_desktop:3.3:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
              "matchCriteriaId": "3497EB29-C406-44C1-AB28-0DDC4E79A9D9",
              "vulnerable": true
            },
            {
              "criteria": "cpe:2.3:a:cisco:secure_desktop:3.4:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
              "matchCriteriaId": "6C63D54D-6424-4767-9832-41E7F0B1D1E9",
              "vulnerable": true
            },
            {
              "criteria": "cpe:2.3:a:cisco:secure_desktop:3.4.1:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
              "matchCriteriaId": "F4D4CF6F-2F81-45B0-9B5B-C8D79E74D6F4",
              "vulnerable": true
            },
            {
              "criteria": "cpe:2.3:a:cisco:secure_desktop:3.4.2:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
              "matchCriteriaId": "AA0286A4-6011-41DF-B607-44CFBBFD437F",
              "vulnerable": true
            },
            {
              "criteria": "cpe:2.3:a:cisco:secure_desktop:3.4.2048:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
              "matchCriteriaId": "FE277431-4101-4C0F-91DB-A1C15C0344FF",
              "vulnerable": true
            },
            {
              "criteria": "cpe:2.3:a:cisco:secure_desktop:3.5:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
              "matchCriteriaId": "4142FB07-D5F0-4209-B0DE-67B768D7BDAC",
              "vulnerable": true
            },
            {
              "criteria": "cpe:2.3:a:cisco:secure_desktop:3.5.841:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
              "matchCriteriaId": "85641AF5-7A5B-4146-9806-E055420DB3AD",
              "vulnerable": true
            },
            {
              "criteria": "cpe:2.3:a:cisco:secure_desktop:3.5.1077:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
              "matchCriteriaId": "7D5FC538-64F7-4F3D-9FAE-82D5015737DE",
              "vulnerable": true
            },
            {
              "criteria": "cpe:2.3:a:cisco:secure_desktop:3.5.2001:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
              "matchCriteriaId": "4F72D901-C62C-41A0-8D68-72CB9508E507",
              "vulnerable": true
            }
          ],
          "negate": false,
          "operator": "OR"
        }
      ]
    }
  ],
  "cveTags": [],
  "descriptions": [
    {
      "lang": "en",
      "value": "The HostScan downloader implementation in Cisco AnyConnect Secure Mobility Client 3.x before 3.0 MR8 and Cisco Secure Desktop before 3.6.6020 does not compare the timestamp of offered software to the timestamp of installed software, which allows remote attackers to force a version downgrade by using (1) ActiveX or (2) Java components to offer signed code that corresponds to an older software release, aka Bug ID CSCtx74235."
    },
    {
      "lang": "es",
      "value": "La implementaci\u00f3n de HostScan en Cisco AnyConnect Secure Mobility Client v3.x antes de v3.0 MR8 y Cisco Secure Desktop antes de v3.6.6020 no compara la marca de tiempo del software ofrecido con la marca de tiempo del software instalado, lo que permite forzar una rebaja de la versi\u00f3n a atacantes remotos mediante el uso de componentes (1) ActiveX o (2) Java para ofrecer c\u00f3digo firmado que corresponde a una versi\u00f3n anterior del software. Se trata de un prblema tambi\u00e9n conocido como Bug ID CSCtx74235."
    }
  ],
  "id": "CVE-2012-2495",
  "lastModified": "2026-06-16T23:41:36.450",
  "metrics": {
    "cvssMetricV2": [
      {
        "acInsufInfo": false,
        "baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
        "cvssData": {
          "accessComplexity": "MEDIUM",
          "accessVector": "NETWORK",
          "authentication": "NONE",
          "availabilityImpact": "NONE",
          "baseScore": 4.3,
          "confidentialityImpact": "NONE",
          "integrityImpact": "PARTIAL",
          "vectorString": "AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:N",
          "version": "2.0"
        },
        "exploitabilityScore": 8.6,
        "impactScore": 2.9,
        "obtainAllPrivilege": false,
        "obtainOtherPrivilege": false,
        "obtainUserPrivilege": false,
        "source": "nvd@nist.gov",
        "type": "Primary",
        "userInteractionRequired": true
      }
    ]
  },
  "published": "2012-06-20T20:55:02.590",
  "references": [
    {
      "source": "psirt@cisco.com",
      "tags": [
        "Vendor Advisory"
      ],
      "url": "http://tools.cisco.com/security/center/content/CiscoSecurityAdvisory/cisco-sa-20120620-ac"
    },
    {
      "source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
      "tags": [
        "Vendor Advisory"
      ],
      "url": "http://tools.cisco.com/security/center/content/CiscoSecurityAdvisory/cisco-sa-20120620-ac"
    }
  ],
  "sourceIdentifier": "psirt@cisco.com",
  "vulnStatus": "Modified",
  "weaknesses": [
    {
      "description": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "value": "CWE-20"
        }
      ],
      "source": "nvd@nist.gov",
      "type": "Primary"
    }
  ]
}



Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Drag nodes to arrange them. Double-click a related vulnerability to open it, or a source to visit its link. The Physics button on the left tunes the layout and the simulation; the legend at the bottom left hides or shows nodes by kind and by sighting type.

Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Vulnerability timeline

Sightings and recorded dates, grouped by day · UTC

JSON
How durations are calculated

Following the VTEM framework (Black Hat USA 2015), time to patch starts when the vendor or a coordinator was informed, total time to patch at discovery, and disclosure to patch at public disclosure; vendor response time runs from the report to its acknowledgement. Time to exploit and time unpatched start at the earliest discovery or report, falling back to public disclosure. Unpatched time ends at the first recorded patch, or the calculation time when no patch is recorded. Exploitation to patch shows the interval between those two events; a published proof of concept is a public exploit, not exploitation.

Each result shows its source dates. A negative interval means the end event came first; when date-only inputs leave the order open, the result says so. Date-only inputs are approximate. The earliest evidence wins: KEV report dates and sightings are labelled as such. Records describing another vulnerability are listed but never calculated from, and a PoC alone does not establish exploitation. Missing patch evidence does not prove that no patch exists. Filters below change the event list only.

Events included in the timeline

Loading timeline…


    Loading…

    Loading…

    Loading…

    Related by attack behaviour

    Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.