FKIE_CVE-2012-1191

Vulnerability from fkie_nvd - Published: 2012-02-17 22:55 - Updated: 2026-04-29 01:13
Severity ?
Summary
The resolver in dnscache in Daniel J. Bernstein djbdns 1.05 overwrites cached server names and TTL values in NS records during the processing of a response to an A record query, which allows remote attackers to trigger continued resolvability of revoked domain names via a "ghost domain names" attack.
References
cve@mitre.orghttps://www.isc.org/files/imce/ghostdomain_camera.pdfExploit
af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108https://www.isc.org/files/imce/ghostdomain_camera.pdfExploit
Impacted products
Vendor Product Version
d.j.bernstein djbdns 1.05
To clipboard 

{
  "configurations": [
    {
      "nodes": [
        {
          "cpeMatch": [
            {
              "criteria": "cpe:2.3:a:d.j.bernstein:djbdns:1.05:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
              "matchCriteriaId": "DC196644-7220-46EF-92CF-87F9BD45AEF5",
              "vulnerable": true
            }
          ],
          "negate": false,
          "operator": "OR"
        }
      ]
    }
  ],
  "cveTags": [],
  "descriptions": [
    {
      "lang": "en",
      "value": "The resolver in dnscache in Daniel J. Bernstein djbdns 1.05 overwrites cached server names and TTL values in NS records during the processing of a response to an A record query, which allows remote attackers to trigger continued resolvability of revoked domain names via a \"ghost domain names\" attack."
    },
    {
      "lang": "es",
      "value": "El componente de resoluci\u00f3n (resolver) del dnscache en Daniel J. Bernstein djbdns v1.05 sobrescribe los nombres de cach\u00e9 del servidor y los valores TTL en los registros NS durante la tramitaci\u00f3n de una respuesta a una consulta de registro A, que permite provocar resolubilidad continuada de nombres de dominio  revocados a atacantes remotos a trav\u00e9s de un ataque  de nombres de dominio fantasma."
    }
  ],
  "id": "CVE-2012-1191",
  "lastModified": "2026-04-29T01:13:23.040",
  "metrics": {
    "cvssMetricV2": [
      {
        "acInsufInfo": false,
        "baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
        "cvssData": {
          "accessComplexity": "LOW",
          "accessVector": "NETWORK",
          "authentication": "NONE",
          "availabilityImpact": "PARTIAL",
          "baseScore": 6.4,
          "confidentialityImpact": "NONE",
          "integrityImpact": "PARTIAL",
          "vectorString": "AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:P",
          "version": "2.0"
        },
        "exploitabilityScore": 10.0,
        "impactScore": 4.9,
        "obtainAllPrivilege": false,
        "obtainOtherPrivilege": false,
        "obtainUserPrivilege": false,
        "source": "nvd@nist.gov",
        "type": "Primary",
        "userInteractionRequired": false
      }
    ]
  },
  "published": "2012-02-17T22:55:00.650",
  "references": [
    {
      "source": "cve@mitre.org",
      "tags": [
        "Exploit"
      ],
      "url": "https://www.isc.org/files/imce/ghostdomain_camera.pdf"
    },
    {
      "source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
      "tags": [
        "Exploit"
      ],
      "url": "https://www.isc.org/files/imce/ghostdomain_camera.pdf"
    }
  ],
  "sourceIdentifier": "cve@mitre.org",
  "vulnStatus": "Modified",
  "weaknesses": [
    {
      "description": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "value": "CWE-20"
        }
      ],
      "source": "nvd@nist.gov",
      "type": "Primary"
    }
  ]
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.




Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.



Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.