FKIE_CVE-2010-4825
Vulnerability from fkie_nvd - Published: 2011-08-24 10:55 - Updated: 2026-04-29 01:13
Severity ?
Summary
Cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in magpie_debug.php in the Twitter Feed plugin (wp-twitter-feed) 0.3.1 for WordPress allows remote attackers to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via the url parameter.
References
Impacted products
| Vendor | Product | Version | |
|---|---|---|---|
| pleer | wp-twitter-feed | 0.3.1 | |
| wordpress | wordpress | * |
{
"configurations": [
{
"nodes": [
{
"cpeMatch": [
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:a:pleer:wp-twitter-feed:0.3.1:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "F7430D20-69EF-43C0-AFE3-73BBAC4E8E25",
"vulnerable": true
}
],
"negate": false,
"operator": "OR"
},
{
"cpeMatch": [
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:a:wordpress:wordpress:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "847DA578-4655-477E-8A6F-99FBE738E4F9",
"vulnerable": false
}
],
"negate": false,
"operator": "OR"
}
],
"operator": "AND"
}
],
"cveTags": [],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "Cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in magpie_debug.php in the Twitter Feed plugin (wp-twitter-feed) 0.3.1 for WordPress allows remote attackers to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via the url parameter."
},
{
"lang": "es",
"value": "Vulnerabilidad de ejecuci\u00f3n de secuencias de comandos en sitios cruzados (XSS) en magpie_debug.php en el complemento Twitter Feed (wp-twitter-feed) v0.3.1 para WordPress, permite a atacantes remotos inyectar secuencias de comandos web o HTML a trav\u00e9s del par\u00e1metro url."
}
],
"id": "CVE-2010-4825",
"lastModified": "2026-04-29T01:13:23.040",
"metrics": {
"cvssMetricV2": [
{
"acInsufInfo": false,
"baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
"cvssData": {
"accessComplexity": "MEDIUM",
"accessVector": "NETWORK",
"authentication": "NONE",
"availabilityImpact": "NONE",
"baseScore": 4.3,
"confidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"integrityImpact": "PARTIAL",
"vectorString": "AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:N",
"version": "2.0"
},
"exploitabilityScore": 8.6,
"impactScore": 2.9,
"obtainAllPrivilege": false,
"obtainOtherPrivilege": false,
"obtainUserPrivilege": false,
"source": "nvd@nist.gov",
"type": "Primary",
"userInteractionRequired": true
}
]
},
"published": "2011-08-24T10:55:05.320",
"references": [
{
"source": "cve@mitre.org",
"tags": [
"Vendor Advisory"
],
"url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/42542"
},
{
"source": "cve@mitre.org",
"tags": [
"Exploit"
],
"url": "http://www.johnleitch.net/Vulnerabilities/WordPress.Twitter.Feed.0.3.1.Reflected.Cross-site.Scripting/68"
},
{
"source": "cve@mitre.org",
"tags": [
"Exploit"
],
"url": "http://www.osvdb.org/69760"
},
{
"source": "cve@mitre.org",
"tags": [
"Exploit"
],
"url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/45294"
},
{
"source": "cve@mitre.org",
"url": "https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/63942"
},
{
"source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"tags": [
"Vendor Advisory"
],
"url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/42542"
},
{
"source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"tags": [
"Exploit"
],
"url": "http://www.johnleitch.net/Vulnerabilities/WordPress.Twitter.Feed.0.3.1.Reflected.Cross-site.Scripting/68"
},
{
"source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"tags": [
"Exploit"
],
"url": "http://www.osvdb.org/69760"
},
{
"source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"tags": [
"Exploit"
],
"url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/45294"
},
{
"source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"url": "https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/63942"
}
],
"sourceIdentifier": "cve@mitre.org",
"vulnStatus": "Modified",
"weaknesses": [
{
"description": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "CWE-79"
}
],
"source": "nvd@nist.gov",
"type": "Primary"
}
]
}
Loading…
Loading…
Experimental. This forecast is provided for visualization only and may change without notice. Do not use it for operational decisions.
Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date | Other |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…