FKIE_CVE-2010-2282

Vulnerability from fkie_nvd - Published: 2010-06-15 14:30 - Updated: 2026-04-29 01:13
Severity ?
Summary
Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in TomatoCMS 2.0.6 allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators for requests that change the administrative password.
References
cve@mitre.orghttp://holisticinfosec.org/content/view/148/45/
cve@mitre.orghttp://secunia.com/advisories/39680Vendor Advisory
af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108http://holisticinfosec.org/content/view/148/45/
af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108http://secunia.com/advisories/39680Vendor Advisory
Impacted products
Vendor Product Version
tomatocms tomatocms 2.0.6
To clipboard 

{
  "configurations": [
    {
      "nodes": [
        {
          "cpeMatch": [
            {
              "criteria": "cpe:2.3:a:tomatocms:tomatocms:2.0.6:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
              "matchCriteriaId": "88D956F9-5C91-4C78-BDC8-8986B250FF6C",
              "vulnerable": true
            }
          ],
          "negate": false,
          "operator": "OR"
        }
      ]
    }
  ],
  "cveTags": [],
  "descriptions": [
    {
      "lang": "en",
      "value": "Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in TomatoCMS 2.0.6 allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators for requests that change the administrative password."
    },
    {
      "lang": "es",
      "value": "Una vulnerabilidad de falsificaci\u00f3n de petici\u00f3n en sitios cruzados (CSRF) en TomatoCMS v2.0.6 permite a atacantes remotos secuestrar la autenticaci\u00f3n de los administradores para las peticiones de cambio la contrase\u00f1a de administraci\u00f3n."
    }
  ],
  "id": "CVE-2010-2282",
  "lastModified": "2026-04-29T01:13:23.040",
  "metrics": {
    "cvssMetricV2": [
      {
        "acInsufInfo": false,
        "baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
        "cvssData": {
          "accessComplexity": "HIGH",
          "accessVector": "NETWORK",
          "authentication": "NONE",
          "availabilityImpact": "PARTIAL",
          "baseScore": 5.1,
          "confidentialityImpact": "PARTIAL",
          "integrityImpact": "PARTIAL",
          "vectorString": "AV:N/AC:H/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:P",
          "version": "2.0"
        },
        "exploitabilityScore": 4.9,
        "impactScore": 6.4,
        "obtainAllPrivilege": false,
        "obtainOtherPrivilege": false,
        "obtainUserPrivilege": false,
        "source": "nvd@nist.gov",
        "type": "Primary",
        "userInteractionRequired": true
      }
    ]
  },
  "published": "2010-06-15T14:30:01.767",
  "references": [
    {
      "source": "cve@mitre.org",
      "url": "http://holisticinfosec.org/content/view/148/45/"
    },
    {
      "source": "cve@mitre.org",
      "tags": [
        "Vendor Advisory"
      ],
      "url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/39680"
    },
    {
      "source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
      "url": "http://holisticinfosec.org/content/view/148/45/"
    },
    {
      "source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
      "tags": [
        "Vendor Advisory"
      ],
      "url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/39680"
    }
  ],
  "sourceIdentifier": "cve@mitre.org",
  "vulnStatus": "Modified",
  "weaknesses": [
    {
      "description": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "value": "CWE-352"
        }
      ],
      "source": "nvd@nist.gov",
      "type": "Primary"
    }
  ]
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.




Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.



Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.