FKIE_CVE-2009-1283

Vulnerability from fkie_nvd - Published: 2009-04-09 16:27 - Updated: 2026-06-16 23:06
Severity
Summary
glFusion before 1.1.3 performs authentication with a user-provided password hash instead of a password, which allows remote attackers to gain privileges by obtaining the hash and using it in the glf_password cookie, aka "User Masquerading." NOTE: this can be leveraged with a separate SQL injection vulnerability to steal hashes.
References
cve@mitre.orghttp://marc.info/?l=bugtraq&m=123877379105028&w=2Exploit
cve@mitre.orghttp://retrogod.altervista.org/9sg_glfuso_sql_cookies.htmlExploit
cve@mitre.orghttp://secunia.com/advisories/34575Vendor Advisory
cve@mitre.orghttp://www.glfusion.org/article.php/glfusion113Patch, Vendor Advisory
cve@mitre.orghttp://www.glfusion.org/wiki/doku.php?id=glfusion:whatsnewVendor Advisory
cve@mitre.orghttps://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/8347
af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108http://marc.info/?l=bugtraq&m=123877379105028&w=2Exploit
af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108http://retrogod.altervista.org/9sg_glfuso_sql_cookies.htmlExploit
af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108http://secunia.com/advisories/34575Vendor Advisory
af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108http://www.glfusion.org/article.php/glfusion113Patch, Vendor Advisory
af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108http://www.glfusion.org/wiki/doku.php?id=glfusion:whatsnewVendor Advisory
af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108https://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/8347
Impacted products
Vendor Product Version
glfusion glfusion *
glfusion glfusion 1.0.0
glfusion glfusion 1.0.0
glfusion glfusion 1.0.0
glfusion glfusion 1.0.1
glfusion glfusion 1.0.2
glfusion glfusion 1.1.0
glfusion glfusion 1.1.0
glfusion glfusion 1.1.1
To clipboard 

{
  "affected": [
    {
      "affectedData": [
        {
          "product": "n/a",
          "vendor": "n/a",
          "versions": [
            {
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "n/a"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "source": "cve@mitre.org"
    }
  ],
  "configurations": [
    {
      "nodes": [
        {
          "cpeMatch": [
            {
              "criteria": "cpe:2.3:a:glfusion:glfusion:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
              "matchCriteriaId": "ED6C9F8D-68B5-4269-8202-D49B48434214",
              "versionEndIncluding": "1.1.2",
              "vulnerable": true
            },
            {
              "criteria": "cpe:2.3:a:glfusion:glfusion:1.0.0:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
              "matchCriteriaId": "798B4747-978F-46D2-8EF1-76D8BC0872F2",
              "vulnerable": true
            },
            {
              "criteria": "cpe:2.3:a:glfusion:glfusion:1.0.0:rc1:*:*:*:*:*:*",
              "matchCriteriaId": "E3D0B5AC-35D8-4900-B2F8-95D661E880CF",
              "vulnerable": true
            },
            {
              "criteria": "cpe:2.3:a:glfusion:glfusion:1.0.0:rc2:*:*:*:*:*:*",
              "matchCriteriaId": "3FE6694E-7ED1-45F4-94D7-D5CD9AA6D801",
              "vulnerable": true
            },
            {
              "criteria": "cpe:2.3:a:glfusion:glfusion:1.0.1:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
              "matchCriteriaId": "D711131E-314B-4BBE-9E6F-973C154694B4",
              "vulnerable": true
            },
            {
              "criteria": "cpe:2.3:a:glfusion:glfusion:1.0.2:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
              "matchCriteriaId": "B0A24202-EB12-4428-A327-97504EB460B6",
              "vulnerable": true
            },
            {
              "criteria": "cpe:2.3:a:glfusion:glfusion:1.1.0:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
              "matchCriteriaId": "D80EE971-44CA-478F-88CB-A13CBDD628CF",
              "vulnerable": true
            },
            {
              "criteria": "cpe:2.3:a:glfusion:glfusion:1.1.0:rc1:*:*:*:*:*:*",
              "matchCriteriaId": "51D13EE5-3B44-4AB3-86CD-01E9488DFBF4",
              "vulnerable": true
            },
            {
              "criteria": "cpe:2.3:a:glfusion:glfusion:1.1.1:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
              "matchCriteriaId": "6941B9D9-5EA0-4954-89E8-350B4EE8E35A",
              "vulnerable": true
            }
          ],
          "negate": false,
          "operator": "OR"
        }
      ]
    }
  ],
  "cveTags": [],
  "descriptions": [
    {
      "lang": "en",
      "value": "glFusion before 1.1.3 performs authentication with a user-provided password hash instead of a password, which allows remote attackers to gain privileges by obtaining the hash and using it in the glf_password cookie, aka \"User Masquerading.\" NOTE: this can be leveraged with a separate SQL injection vulnerability to steal hashes."
    },
    {
      "lang": "es",
      "value": "glFusion anterior a v1.1.3 realiza la autenticaci\u00f3n con el hash de una contrase\u00f1a en lugar de una contrase\u00f1a, lo que permite a atacantes remotos obtener privilegios mediante la obtenci\u00f3n del hash y utilizarlo en la cookie glf_password, (tambien conocido como \"Enmascaramiento de usuario.\") NOTA: esto puede ser apoyado con una vulnerabilidad de inyecci\u00f3n SQL para robar hashes."
    }
  ],
  "id": "CVE-2009-1283",
  "lastModified": "2026-06-16T23:06:56.420",
  "metrics": {
    "cvssMetricV2": [
      {
        "acInsufInfo": false,
        "baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
        "cvssData": {
          "accessComplexity": "MEDIUM",
          "accessVector": "NETWORK",
          "authentication": "NONE",
          "availabilityImpact": "PARTIAL",
          "baseScore": 6.8,
          "confidentialityImpact": "PARTIAL",
          "integrityImpact": "PARTIAL",
          "vectorString": "AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:P",
          "version": "2.0"
        },
        "exploitabilityScore": 8.6,
        "impactScore": 6.4,
        "obtainAllPrivilege": false,
        "obtainOtherPrivilege": true,
        "obtainUserPrivilege": false,
        "source": "nvd@nist.gov",
        "type": "Primary",
        "userInteractionRequired": false
      }
    ]
  },
  "published": "2009-04-09T16:27:57.577",
  "references": [
    {
      "source": "cve@mitre.org",
      "tags": [
        "Exploit"
      ],
      "url": "http://marc.info/?l=bugtraq\u0026m=123877379105028\u0026w=2"
    },
    {
      "source": "cve@mitre.org",
      "tags": [
        "Exploit"
      ],
      "url": "http://retrogod.altervista.org/9sg_glfuso_sql_cookies.html"
    },
    {
      "source": "cve@mitre.org",
      "tags": [
        "Vendor Advisory"
      ],
      "url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/34575"
    },
    {
      "source": "cve@mitre.org",
      "tags": [
        "Patch",
        "Vendor Advisory"
      ],
      "url": "http://www.glfusion.org/article.php/glfusion113"
    },
    {
      "source": "cve@mitre.org",
      "tags": [
        "Vendor Advisory"
      ],
      "url": "http://www.glfusion.org/wiki/doku.php?id=glfusion:whatsnew"
    },
    {
      "source": "cve@mitre.org",
      "url": "https://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/8347"
    },
    {
      "source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
      "tags": [
        "Exploit"
      ],
      "url": "http://marc.info/?l=bugtraq\u0026m=123877379105028\u0026w=2"
    },
    {
      "source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
      "tags": [
        "Exploit"
      ],
      "url": "http://retrogod.altervista.org/9sg_glfuso_sql_cookies.html"
    },
    {
      "source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
      "tags": [
        "Vendor Advisory"
      ],
      "url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/34575"
    },
    {
      "source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
      "tags": [
        "Patch",
        "Vendor Advisory"
      ],
      "url": "http://www.glfusion.org/article.php/glfusion113"
    },
    {
      "source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
      "tags": [
        "Vendor Advisory"
      ],
      "url": "http://www.glfusion.org/wiki/doku.php?id=glfusion:whatsnew"
    },
    {
      "source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
      "url": "https://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/8347"
    }
  ],
  "sourceIdentifier": "cve@mitre.org",
  "vulnStatus": "Modified",
  "weaknesses": [
    {
      "description": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "value": "CWE-310"
        }
      ],
      "source": "nvd@nist.gov",
      "type": "Primary"
    }
  ]
}



Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.




Drag nodes to arrange them. Double-click a related vulnerability to open it, or a source to visit its link. The Physics button on the left tunes the layout and the simulation; the legend at the bottom left hides or shows nodes by kind and by sighting type.

Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Vulnerability timeline

Sightings and recorded dates, grouped by day · UTC

JSON
How durations are calculated

Following the VTEM framework (Black Hat USA 2015), time to patch starts when the vendor or a coordinator was informed, total time to patch at discovery, and disclosure to patch at public disclosure; vendor response time runs from the report to its acknowledgement. Time to exploit and time unpatched start at the earliest discovery or report, falling back to public disclosure. Unpatched time ends at the first recorded patch, or the calculation time when no patch is recorded. Exploitation to patch shows the interval between those two events; a published proof of concept is a public exploit, not exploitation.

Each result shows its source dates. A negative interval means the end event came first; when date-only inputs leave the order open, the result says so. Date-only inputs are approximate. The earliest evidence wins: KEV report dates and sightings are labelled as such. Records describing another vulnerability are listed but never calculated from, and a PoC alone does not establish exploitation. Missing patch evidence does not prove that no patch exists. Filters below change the event list only.

Loading timeline…




    Related by attack behaviour

    Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.