FKIE_CVE-2009-0124
Vulnerability from fkie_nvd - Published: 2009-01-15 17:30 - Updated: 2026-06-16 23:04
Severity
Summary
The tqsl_verifyDataBlock function in openssl_cert.cpp in American Radio Relay League (ARRL) tqsllib 2.0 does not properly check the return value from the OpenSSL EVP_VerifyFinal function, which allows remote attackers to bypass validation of the certificate chain via a malformed SSL/TLS signature, a similar vulnerability to CVE-2008-5077.
References
{
"affected": [
{
"affectedData": [
{
"product": "n/a",
"vendor": "n/a",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "n/a"
}
]
}
],
"source": "cve@mitre.org"
}
],
"configurations": [
{
"nodes": [
{
"cpeMatch": [
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:a:arrl:tqsllib:2.0:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "C502AE9C-127A-4E16-A442-306C4FE00796",
"vulnerable": true
}
],
"negate": false,
"operator": "OR"
}
]
}
],
"cveTags": [],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "The tqsl_verifyDataBlock function in openssl_cert.cpp in American Radio Relay League (ARRL) tqsllib 2.0 does not properly check the return value from the OpenSSL EVP_VerifyFinal function, which allows remote attackers to bypass validation of the certificate chain via a malformed SSL/TLS signature, a similar vulnerability to CVE-2008-5077."
},
{
"lang": "es",
"value": "La funci\u00f3n tqsl_verifyDataBlock en American Radio Relay League (ARRL) tqsllib v2.0 no comprueba adecuadamente el valor de retorno de la funci\u00f3n OpenSSL EVP_VerifyFinal, lo que permitir\u00eda a atacantes remotos evitar la cadena de validaci\u00f3n de certificado a trav\u00e9s de una firma SSL/TLS malformada, una vulnerabilidad similar a CVE-2008-5077."
}
],
"id": "CVE-2009-0124",
"lastModified": "2026-06-16T23:04:18.223",
"metrics": {
"cvssMetricV2": [
{
"acInsufInfo": false,
"baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
"cvssData": {
"accessComplexity": "LOW",
"accessVector": "NETWORK",
"authentication": "NONE",
"availabilityImpact": "NONE",
"baseScore": 5.0,
"confidentialityImpact": "PARTIAL",
"integrityImpact": "NONE",
"vectorString": "AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N",
"version": "2.0"
},
"exploitabilityScore": 10.0,
"impactScore": 2.9,
"obtainAllPrivilege": false,
"obtainOtherPrivilege": false,
"obtainUserPrivilege": false,
"source": "nvd@nist.gov",
"type": "Primary",
"userInteractionRequired": false
}
]
},
"published": "2009-01-15T17:30:00.530",
"references": [
{
"source": "cve@mitre.org",
"tags": [
"Exploit"
],
"url": "http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=511509"
},
{
"source": "cve@mitre.org",
"url": "http://openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2009/01/12/4"
},
{
"source": "cve@mitre.org",
"url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/33543"
},
{
"source": "cve@mitre.org",
"url": "https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479650"
},
{
"source": "cve@mitre.org",
"url": "https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-package-announce/2009-January/msg00557.html"
},
{
"source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"tags": [
"Exploit"
],
"url": "http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=511509"
},
{
"source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"url": "http://openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2009/01/12/4"
},
{
"source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/33543"
},
{
"source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"url": "https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479650"
},
{
"source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"url": "https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-package-announce/2009-January/msg00557.html"
}
],
"sourceIdentifier": "cve@mitre.org",
"vulnStatus": "Modified",
"weaknesses": [
{
"description": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "CWE-287"
}
],
"source": "nvd@nist.gov",
"type": "Primary"
}
]
}
Loading…
Loading…
Experimental. This forecast is provided for visualization only and may change without notice. Do not use it for operational decisions.
Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date | Other |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…