FKIE_CVE-2008-4870

Vulnerability from fkie_nvd - Published: 2008-11-01 00:00 - Updated: 2026-06-16 22:58
Severity
Summary
dovecot 1.0.7 in Red Hat Enterprise Linux (RHEL) 5, and possibly Fedora, uses world-readable permissions for dovecot.conf, which allows local users to obtain the ssl_key_password parameter value.
References
cve@mitre.orghttp://secunia.com/advisories/32164Broken Link
cve@mitre.orghttp://secunia.com/advisories/33149Broken Link
cve@mitre.orghttp://secunia.com/advisories/33624Broken Link
cve@mitre.orghttp://security.gentoo.org/glsa/glsa-200812-16.xmlThird Party Advisory
cve@mitre.orghttp://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2008/10/29/10Mailing List, Third Party Advisory
cve@mitre.orghttp://www.redhat.com/support/errata/RHSA-2009-0205.htmlThird Party Advisory
cve@mitre.orghttps://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=436287Issue Tracking, Third Party Advisory
cve@mitre.orghttps://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/46323Third Party Advisory, VDB Entry
cve@mitre.orghttps://oval.cisecurity.org/repository/search/definition/oval%3Aorg.mitre.oval%3Adef%3A10776Tool Signature
af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108http://secunia.com/advisories/32164Broken Link
af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108http://secunia.com/advisories/33149Broken Link
af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108http://secunia.com/advisories/33624Broken Link
af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108http://security.gentoo.org/glsa/glsa-200812-16.xmlThird Party Advisory
af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2008/10/29/10Mailing List, Third Party Advisory
af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108http://www.redhat.com/support/errata/RHSA-2009-0205.htmlThird Party Advisory
af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=436287Issue Tracking, Third Party Advisory
af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/46323Third Party Advisory, VDB Entry
af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108https://oval.cisecurity.org/repository/search/definition/oval%3Aorg.mitre.oval%3Adef%3A10776Tool Signature
Impacted products
Vendor Product Version
dovecot dovecot 1.0.7
redhat enterprise_linux 5.0

{
  "affected": [
    {
      "affectedData": [
        {
          "product": "n/a",
          "vendor": "n/a",
          "versions": [
            {
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "n/a"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "source": "cve@mitre.org"
    }
  ],
  "configurations": [
    {
      "nodes": [
        {
          "cpeMatch": [
            {
              "criteria": "cpe:2.3:a:dovecot:dovecot:1.0.7:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
              "matchCriteriaId": "4A349510-4D00-4978-93D9-3F9F5E0CD8DE",
              "vulnerable": true
            }
          ],
          "negate": false,
          "operator": "OR"
        },
        {
          "cpeMatch": [
            {
              "criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:redhat:enterprise_linux:5.0:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
              "matchCriteriaId": "1D8B549B-E57B-4DFE-8A13-CAB06B5356B3",
              "vulnerable": false
            }
          ],
          "negate": false,
          "operator": "OR"
        }
      ],
      "operator": "AND"
    }
  ],
  "cveTags": [],
  "descriptions": [
    {
      "lang": "en",
      "value": "dovecot 1.0.7 in Red Hat Enterprise Linux (RHEL) 5, and possibly Fedora, uses world-readable permissions for dovecot.conf, which allows local users to obtain the ssl_key_password parameter value."
    },
    {
      "lang": "es",
      "value": "dovecot 1.0.7 en Red Hat Enterprise Linux (RHEL) 5 y posiblemente Fedora, utiliza permisos le\u00edbles por todo el mundo para dovecot.conf, lo que permite a usuarios locales obtener el valor del par\u00e1metro ssl_key_password."
    }
  ],
  "id": "CVE-2008-4870",
  "lastModified": "2026-06-16T22:58:40.383",
  "metrics": {
    "cvssMetricV2": [
      {
        "acInsufInfo": false,
        "baseSeverity": "LOW",
        "cvssData": {
          "accessComplexity": "LOW",
          "accessVector": "LOCAL",
          "authentication": "NONE",
          "availabilityImpact": "NONE",
          "baseScore": 2.1,
          "confidentialityImpact": "PARTIAL",
          "integrityImpact": "NONE",
          "vectorString": "AV:L/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N",
          "version": "2.0"
        },
        "exploitabilityScore": 3.9,
        "impactScore": 2.9,
        "obtainAllPrivilege": false,
        "obtainOtherPrivilege": false,
        "obtainUserPrivilege": false,
        "source": "nvd@nist.gov",
        "type": "Primary",
        "userInteractionRequired": false
      }
    ]
  },
  "published": "2008-11-01T00:00:01.273",
  "references": [
    {
      "source": "cve@mitre.org",
      "tags": [
        "Broken Link"
      ],
      "url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/32164"
    },
    {
      "source": "cve@mitre.org",
      "tags": [
        "Broken Link"
      ],
      "url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/33149"
    },
    {
      "source": "cve@mitre.org",
      "tags": [
        "Broken Link"
      ],
      "url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/33624"
    },
    {
      "source": "cve@mitre.org",
      "tags": [
        "Third Party Advisory"
      ],
      "url": "http://security.gentoo.org/glsa/glsa-200812-16.xml"
    },
    {
      "source": "cve@mitre.org",
      "tags": [
        "Mailing List",
        "Third Party Advisory"
      ],
      "url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2008/10/29/10"
    },
    {
      "source": "cve@mitre.org",
      "tags": [
        "Third Party Advisory"
      ],
      "url": "http://www.redhat.com/support/errata/RHSA-2009-0205.html"
    },
    {
      "source": "cve@mitre.org",
      "tags": [
        "Issue Tracking",
        "Third Party Advisory"
      ],
      "url": "https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=436287"
    },
    {
      "source": "cve@mitre.org",
      "tags": [
        "Third Party Advisory",
        "VDB Entry"
      ],
      "url": "https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/46323"
    },
    {
      "source": "cve@mitre.org",
      "tags": [
        "Tool Signature"
      ],
      "url": "https://oval.cisecurity.org/repository/search/definition/oval%3Aorg.mitre.oval%3Adef%3A10776"
    },
    {
      "source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
      "tags": [
        "Broken Link"
      ],
      "url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/32164"
    },
    {
      "source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
      "tags": [
        "Broken Link"
      ],
      "url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/33149"
    },
    {
      "source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
      "tags": [
        "Broken Link"
      ],
      "url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/33624"
    },
    {
      "source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
      "tags": [
        "Third Party Advisory"
      ],
      "url": "http://security.gentoo.org/glsa/glsa-200812-16.xml"
    },
    {
      "source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
      "tags": [
        "Mailing List",
        "Third Party Advisory"
      ],
      "url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2008/10/29/10"
    },
    {
      "source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
      "tags": [
        "Third Party Advisory"
      ],
      "url": "http://www.redhat.com/support/errata/RHSA-2009-0205.html"
    },
    {
      "source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
      "tags": [
        "Issue Tracking",
        "Third Party Advisory"
      ],
      "url": "https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=436287"
    },
    {
      "source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
      "tags": [
        "Third Party Advisory",
        "VDB Entry"
      ],
      "url": "https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/46323"
    },
    {
      "source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
      "tags": [
        "Tool Signature"
      ],
      "url": "https://oval.cisecurity.org/repository/search/definition/oval%3Aorg.mitre.oval%3Adef%3A10776"
    }
  ],
  "sourceIdentifier": "cve@mitre.org",
  "vulnStatus": "Modified",
  "weaknesses": [
    {
      "description": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "value": "CWE-732"
        }
      ],
      "source": "nvd@nist.gov",
      "type": "Primary"
    }
  ]
}



Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Drag nodes to arrange them. Double-click a related vulnerability to open it, or a source to visit its link. The Physics button on the left tunes the layout and the simulation; the legend at the bottom left hides or shows nodes by kind and by sighting type.

Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Vulnerability timeline

Sightings and recorded dates, grouped by day · UTC

JSON
How durations are calculated

Following the VTEM framework (Black Hat USA 2015), time to patch starts when the vendor or a coordinator was informed, total time to patch at discovery, and disclosure to patch at public disclosure; vendor response time runs from the report to its acknowledgement. Time to exploit and time unpatched start at the earliest discovery or report, falling back to public disclosure. Unpatched time ends at the first recorded patch, or the calculation time when no patch is recorded. Exploitation to patch shows the interval between those two events; a published proof of concept is a public exploit, not exploitation.

Each result shows its source dates. A negative interval means the end event came first; when date-only inputs leave the order open, the result says so. Date-only inputs are approximate. The earliest evidence wins: KEV report dates and sightings are labelled as such. Records describing another vulnerability are listed but never calculated from, and a PoC alone does not establish exploitation. Missing patch evidence does not prove that no patch exists. Filters below change the event list only.

Events included in the timeline

Loading timeline…


    Loading…

    Loading…

    Loading…

    Related by attack behaviour

    Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.