FKIE_CVE-2008-0391

Vulnerability from fkie_nvd - Published: 2008-01-23 02:00 - Updated: 2026-06-16 22:49
Severity
Summary
inc/elementz.php in aliTalk 1.9.1.1 does not properly verify authentication, which allows remote attackers to add an arbitrary user account via a modified lilil parameter, in conjunction with the ubild and pa parameters.
Impacted products
Vendor Product Version
alilg alitalk 1.9.1.1

{
  "affected": [
    {
      "affectedData": [
        {
          "product": "n/a",
          "vendor": "n/a",
          "versions": [
            {
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "n/a"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "source": "cve@mitre.org"
    }
  ],
  "configurations": [
    {
      "nodes": [
        {
          "cpeMatch": [
            {
              "criteria": "cpe:2.3:a:alilg:alitalk:1.9.1.1:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
              "matchCriteriaId": "BA2E3777-0EFC-40AE-97E9-FFD6A39C7800",
              "vulnerable": true
            }
          ],
          "negate": false,
          "operator": "OR"
        }
      ]
    }
  ],
  "cveTags": [],
  "descriptions": [
    {
      "lang": "en",
      "value": "inc/elementz.php in aliTalk 1.9.1.1 does not properly verify authentication, which allows remote attackers to add an arbitrary user account via a modified lilil parameter, in conjunction with the ubild and pa parameters."
    },
    {
      "lang": "es",
      "value": "inc/elementz.php en aliTalk 1.9.1.1 no verifica de forma adecuada la validaci\u00f3n, lo cual permite a atacantes remotos a\u00f1adir un usuario de su elecci\u00f3n a trav\u00e9s del par\u00e1metro lilil modificado, en una conjunci\u00f3n con los par\u00e1metros ubild y pa."
    }
  ],
  "id": "CVE-2008-0391",
  "lastModified": "2026-06-16T22:49:31.453",
  "metrics": {
    "cvssMetricV2": [
      {
        "acInsufInfo": false,
        "baseSeverity": "HIGH",
        "cvssData": {
          "accessComplexity": "LOW",
          "accessVector": "NETWORK",
          "authentication": "NONE",
          "availabilityImpact": "PARTIAL",
          "baseScore": 7.5,
          "confidentialityImpact": "PARTIAL",
          "integrityImpact": "PARTIAL",
          "vectorString": "AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:P",
          "version": "2.0"
        },
        "exploitabilityScore": 10.0,
        "impactScore": 6.4,
        "obtainAllPrivilege": false,
        "obtainOtherPrivilege": true,
        "obtainUserPrivilege": false,
        "source": "nvd@nist.gov",
        "type": "Primary",
        "userInteractionRequired": false
      }
    ]
  },
  "published": "2008-01-23T02:00:00.000",
  "references": [
    {
      "source": "cve@mitre.org",
      "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/27315"
    },
    {
      "source": "cve@mitre.org",
      "url": "https://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/4922"
    },
    {
      "source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
      "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/27315"
    },
    {
      "source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
      "url": "https://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/4922"
    }
  ],
  "sourceIdentifier": "cve@mitre.org",
  "vulnStatus": "Modified",
  "weaknesses": [
    {
      "description": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "value": "CWE-287"
        }
      ],
      "source": "nvd@nist.gov",
      "type": "Primary"
    }
  ]
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.

Loading…

Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.

Loading…

Loading…