FKIE_CVE-2007-4450
Vulnerability from fkie_nvd - Published: 2007-08-21 00:17 - Updated: 2026-06-16 22:44
Severity
Summary
The server in Toribash 2.71 and earlier does not properly handle long commands, which allows remote attackers to trigger a protocol violation in which data is sent to other clients without a required LF character, as demonstrated by a SAY command. NOTE: the security impact of this violation is not clear, although it probably makes exploitation of CVE-2007-4449 easier.
References
{
"affected": [
{
"affectedData": [
{
"product": "n/a",
"vendor": "n/a",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "n/a"
}
]
}
],
"source": "cve@mitre.org"
}
],
"configurations": [
{
"nodes": [
{
"cpeMatch": [
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:a:toribash:toribash:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "1FA7562C-7666-44D6-932E-34A7D3CC1221",
"versionEndIncluding": "2.71",
"vulnerable": true
}
],
"negate": false,
"operator": "OR"
}
]
}
],
"cveTags": [],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "The server in Toribash 2.71 and earlier does not properly handle long commands, which allows remote attackers to trigger a protocol violation in which data is sent to other clients without a required LF character, as demonstrated by a SAY command. NOTE: the security impact of this violation is not clear, although it probably makes exploitation of CVE-2007-4449 easier."
},
{
"lang": "es",
"value": "El servidor en Toribash versi\u00f3n 2.71 y anteriores, no maneja apropiadamente los comandos largos, lo que permite a atacantes remotos activar una violaci\u00f3n de protocolo en la que los datos se env\u00edan a otros clientes sin un car\u00e1cter LF requerido, como es demostrado por un comando SAY. NOTA: el impacto de esta violaci\u00f3n en la seguridad no est\u00e1 claro, aunque probablemente haga mas f\u00e1cil la explotaci\u00f3n del CVE-2007-4449."
}
],
"id": "CVE-2007-4450",
"lastModified": "2026-06-16T22:44:07.300",
"metrics": {
"cvssMetricV2": [
{
"acInsufInfo": false,
"baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
"cvssData": {
"accessComplexity": "LOW",
"accessVector": "NETWORK",
"authentication": "NONE",
"availabilityImpact": "PARTIAL",
"baseScore": 5.0,
"confidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"integrityImpact": "NONE",
"vectorString": "AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:N/A:P",
"version": "2.0"
},
"exploitabilityScore": 10.0,
"impactScore": 2.9,
"obtainAllPrivilege": false,
"obtainOtherPrivilege": false,
"obtainUserPrivilege": false,
"source": "nvd@nist.gov",
"type": "Primary",
"userInteractionRequired": false
}
]
},
"published": "2007-08-21T00:17:00.000",
"references": [
{
"source": "cve@mitre.org",
"tags": [
"Exploit"
],
"url": "http://aluigi.org/poc/toribashish.zip"
},
{
"source": "cve@mitre.org",
"tags": [
"Vendor Advisory"
],
"url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/26507"
},
{
"source": "cve@mitre.org",
"url": "http://securityreason.com/securityalert/3033"
},
{
"source": "cve@mitre.org",
"url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/477025/100/0/threaded"
},
{
"source": "cve@mitre.org",
"tags": [
"Exploit"
],
"url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/25359"
},
{
"source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"tags": [
"Exploit"
],
"url": "http://aluigi.org/poc/toribashish.zip"
},
{
"source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"tags": [
"Vendor Advisory"
],
"url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/26507"
},
{
"source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"url": "http://securityreason.com/securityalert/3033"
},
{
"source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/477025/100/0/threaded"
},
{
"source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"tags": [
"Exploit"
],
"url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/25359"
}
],
"sourceIdentifier": "cve@mitre.org",
"vulnStatus": "Modified",
"weaknesses": [
{
"description": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "CWE-20"
}
],
"source": "nvd@nist.gov",
"type": "Primary"
}
]
}
Loading…
Loading…
Experimental. This forecast is provided for visualization only and may change without notice. Do not use it for operational decisions.
Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date | Other |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…
The MITRE ATT&CK techniques below are AI-generated suggestions, inferred from the description of the
vulnerability by the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-classification-roberta-base
model, served locally by ML-Gateway.
They have not been verified by an analyst and are provided for guidance only.
The approach is described in our paper Mapping CVEs to MITRE ATT&CK Techniques: A Curated Gold-Set Classifier and the Limits of LLM-Assisted Label Expansion.
Browse all ATT&CK techniques and the vulnerabilities related to each.
The approach is described in our paper Mapping CVEs to MITRE ATT&CK Techniques: A Curated Gold-Set Classifier and the Limits of LLM-Assisted Label Expansion.
Browse all ATT&CK techniques and the vulnerabilities related to each.
Loading…
Related by attack behaviour
Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.
Loading…