FKIE_CVE-2006-6229

Vulnerability from fkie_nvd - Published: 2006-12-02 02:28 - Updated: 2026-06-16 22:32
Severity
Summary
Codewalkers ltwCalendar (aka PHP Event Calendar) before 4.2.1 logs failed passwords, which might allow attackers to infer correct passwords from the log file.
References
cve@mitre.orghttp://ltwcalendar.sourceforge.net/changelog.php
af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108http://ltwcalendar.sourceforge.net/changelog.php
Impacted products
Vendor Product Version
codewalkers ltwcalendar 4.1.3
codewalkers ltwcalendar 4.2
To clipboard 

{
  "affected": [
    {
      "affectedData": [
        {
          "product": "n/a",
          "vendor": "n/a",
          "versions": [
            {
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "n/a"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "source": "cve@mitre.org"
    }
  ],
  "configurations": [
    {
      "nodes": [
        {
          "cpeMatch": [
            {
              "criteria": "cpe:2.3:a:codewalkers:ltwcalendar:4.1.3:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
              "matchCriteriaId": "28F14FBF-66CB-45C4-A516-08C91CF4B734",
              "vulnerable": true
            },
            {
              "criteria": "cpe:2.3:a:codewalkers:ltwcalendar:4.2:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
              "matchCriteriaId": "B632DBF1-D6AA-4A3D-A0BE-0C3B9D98D988",
              "vulnerable": true
            }
          ],
          "negate": false,
          "operator": "OR"
        }
      ]
    }
  ],
  "cveTags": [],
  "descriptions": [
    {
      "lang": "en",
      "value": "Codewalkers ltwCalendar (aka PHP Event Calendar) before 4.2.1 logs failed passwords, which might allow attackers to infer correct passwords from the log file."
    },
    {
      "lang": "es",
      "value": "El c\u00f3digo de ltwCalendar (tambi\u00e9n conocido como PHP Event Calendar) anterior a 4.2.1 registra contrase\u00f1as fallidas, lo cual permitir\u00eda a un atacante remoto averiguar la contrase\u00f1a correcta desde el fichero de log."
    }
  ],
  "id": "CVE-2006-6229",
  "lastModified": "2026-06-16T22:32:43.290",
  "metrics": {
    "cvssMetricV2": [
      {
        "acInsufInfo": false,
        "baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
        "cvssData": {
          "accessComplexity": "LOW",
          "accessVector": "NETWORK",
          "authentication": "NONE",
          "availabilityImpact": "NONE",
          "baseScore": 5.0,
          "confidentialityImpact": "PARTIAL",
          "integrityImpact": "NONE",
          "vectorString": "AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N",
          "version": "2.0"
        },
        "exploitabilityScore": 10.0,
        "impactScore": 2.9,
        "obtainAllPrivilege": false,
        "obtainOtherPrivilege": false,
        "obtainUserPrivilege": false,
        "source": "nvd@nist.gov",
        "type": "Primary",
        "userInteractionRequired": false
      }
    ]
  },
  "published": "2006-12-02T02:28:00.000",
  "references": [
    {
      "source": "cve@mitre.org",
      "url": "http://ltwcalendar.sourceforge.net/changelog.php"
    },
    {
      "source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
      "url": "http://ltwcalendar.sourceforge.net/changelog.php"
    }
  ],
  "sourceIdentifier": "cve@mitre.org",
  "vulnStatus": "Modified",
  "weaknesses": [
    {
      "description": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "value": "NVD-CWE-Other"
        }
      ],
      "source": "nvd@nist.gov",
      "type": "Primary"
    }
  ]
}



Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.





Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.


Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.