CVE-2026-9058 (GCVE-0-2026-9058)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2026-05-25 13:23 – Updated: 2026-05-25 13:23
VLAI
Title
Improper Certificate Verification in Szafir SDK
Summary
Szafir SDK returns a success status code from the cryptographic digital signature verification process (i.e. /VerifyingTaskItem/Signature/VerificationResult/Result/@code == 0, "Positively verified") even when the trust status of the signer's certificate could not be established (i.e. /VerifyingTaskItem/Signature/VerificationResult/SigningCertificate/@certificateType == "nondetermined"). This causes consuming applications to incorrectly treat the signature as valid despite an unverified certificate chain, enabling authentication bypass and user impersonation.
This issue was fixed in version 463.
Severity
CWE
Assigner
References
2 references
| URL | Tags |
|---|---|
| https://cert.pl/posts/2026/05/CVE-2026-9058 | third-party-advisory |
| https://www.elektronicznypodpis.pl/ | product |
Impacted products
1 product
| Vendor | Product | Version | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Krajowa Izba Rozliczeniowa | Szafir SDK |
Affected:
0 , < 463
(custom)
|
Credits
{
"containers": {
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "Szafir SDK",
"vendor": "Krajowa Izba Rozliczeniowa",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "463",
"status": "affected",
"version": "0",
"versionType": "custom"
}
]
}
],
"credits": [
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "finder",
"value": "Micha\u0142 Leszczy\u0144ski (icedev.pl)"
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"supportingMedia": [
{
"base64": false,
"type": "text/html",
"value": "\u003cspan style=\"background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255);\"\u003eSzafir SDK returns a success status code from the cryptographic digital signature verification process (i.e. \u003ci\u003e/VerifyingTaskItem/Signature/VerificationResult/Result/@code == 0,\u003c/i\u003e \"Positively verified\") even when the trust status of the signer\u0027s certificate could not be established (i.e. \u003ci\u003e/VerifyingTaskItem/Signature/VerificationResult/SigningCertificate/@certificateType == \"nondetermined\")\u003c/i\u003e. This causes consuming applications to incorrectly treat the signature as valid despite an unverified certificate chain, enabling authentication bypass and user impersonation.\u003cbr\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003cbr\u003eThis issue was fixed in version \u003cspan style=\"background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255);\"\u003e463\u003c/span\u003e."
}
],
"value": "Szafir SDK returns a success status code from the cryptographic digital signature verification process (i.e. /VerifyingTaskItem/Signature/VerificationResult/Result/@code == 0, \"Positively verified\") even when the trust status of the signer\u0027s certificate could not be established (i.e. /VerifyingTaskItem/Signature/VerificationResult/SigningCertificate/@certificateType == \"nondetermined\"). This causes consuming applications to incorrectly treat the signature as valid despite an unverified certificate chain, enabling authentication bypass and user impersonation.\n\nThis issue was fixed in version 463."
}
],
"impacts": [
{
"capecId": "CAPEC-115",
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "CAPEC-115 Authentication Bypass"
}
]
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV4_0": {
"Automatable": "NOT_DEFINED",
"Recovery": "NOT_DEFINED",
"Safety": "NOT_DEFINED",
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackRequirements": "NONE",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"baseScore": 9.3,
"baseSeverity": "CRITICAL",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"providerUrgency": "NOT_DEFINED",
"subAvailabilityImpact": "NONE",
"subConfidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"subIntegrityImpact": "NONE",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"valueDensity": "NOT_DEFINED",
"vectorString": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N",
"version": "4.0",
"vulnAvailabilityImpact": "NONE",
"vulnConfidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
"vulnIntegrityImpact": "HIGH",
"vulnerabilityResponseEffort": "NOT_DEFINED"
},
"format": "CVSS",
"scenarios": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "GENERAL"
}
]
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-637",
"description": "CWE-637 Unnecessary Complexity in Protection Mechanism (Not Using \u0027Economy of Mechanism\u0027)",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
},
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-393",
"description": "CWE-393: Return of Wrong Status Code",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-05-25T13:23:09.157Z",
"orgId": "4bb8329e-dd38-46c1-aafb-9bf32bcb93c6",
"shortName": "CERT-PL"
},
"references": [
{
"tags": [
"third-party-advisory"
],
"url": "https://cert.pl/posts/2026/05/CVE-2026-9058"
},
{
"tags": [
"product"
],
"url": "https://www.elektronicznypodpis.pl/"
}
],
"source": {
"discovery": "EXTERNAL"
},
"title": "Improper Certificate Verification in Szafir SDK",
"x_generator": {
"engine": "Vulnogram 0.2.0"
}
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "4bb8329e-dd38-46c1-aafb-9bf32bcb93c6",
"assignerShortName": "CERT-PL",
"cveId": "CVE-2026-9058",
"datePublished": "2026-05-25T13:23:09.157Z",
"dateReserved": "2026-05-20T06:36:10.929Z",
"dateUpdated": "2026-05-25T13:23:09.157Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2"
}
Loading…
Loading…
Experimental. This forecast is provided for visualization only and may change without notice. Do not use it for operational decisions.
Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date | Other |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…