CVE-2026-80515 (GCVE-0-2026-80515)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2026-09-03 13:41 – Updated: 2026-09-03 13:49| Vendor | Product | Version | CPE status | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Eclipse Foundation | Eclipse Arrowhead |
Affected:
5.0.0 , ≤ 5.2.1
(semver)
|
guessed |
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2026-80515",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "none"
},
{
"Automatable": "no"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "total"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2026-09-03T13:49:38.746560Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-09-03T13:49:45.714Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "Eclipse Arrowhead",
"vendor": "Eclipse Foundation",
"versions": [
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "5.2.1",
"status": "affected",
"version": "5.0.0",
"versionType": "semver"
}
]
}
],
"credits": [
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "finder",
"value": "Eclipse Foundation Security Team"
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"supportingMedia": [
{
"base64": false,
"type": "text/html",
"value": "In Eclipse Arrowhead versions from 5.0.0 to 5.2.1 the management-authorization gate that protects every \u003ccode\u003e/\u2026/mgmt/\u2026\u003c/code\u003e REST endpoint decides whether to apply its check by calling \u003ccode\u003erequest.getRequestURL().toString().contains(\"/mgmt/\")\u003c/code\u003e. Tomcat returns \u003ccode\u003egetRequestURL()\u003c/code\u003e \u003cstrong\u003eun-decoded\u003c/strong\u003e, while Spring MVC\u0027s \u003ccode\u003eDispatcherServlet\u003c/code\u003e routes on the \u003cstrong\u003edecoded\u003c/strong\u003e path. Requesting \u003ccode\u003e/serviceregistry/%6Dgmt/systems\u003c/code\u003e (\u003ccode\u003e%6D\u003c/code\u003e == \u003ccode\u003em\u003c/code\u003e) therefore fails the substring check \u2014 the filter falls through without authorising \u2014 yet is decoded to \u003ccode\u003e/serviceregistry/mgmt/systems\u003c/code\u003e and dispatched to the management controller. Spring Security\u0027s \u003ccode\u003eStrictHttpFirewall\u003c/code\u003e (active via \u003ccode\u003espring-boot-starter-security\u003c/code\u003e in \u003ccode\u003earrowhead-common\u003c/code\u003e) only rejects encoded \u003ccode\u003e/ \\ . % ;\u003c/code\u003e and null bytes, so percent-encoded ASCII letters pass through. Any authenticated system \u2014 regardless of privilege \u2014 can reach every management operation, including \u003ccode\u003ePOST /authentication/mgmt/identities\u003c/code\u003e which creates new sysop accounts, yielding full administrative takeover of the local cloud."
}
],
"value": "In Eclipse Arrowhead versions from 5.0.0 to 5.2.1 the management-authorization gate that protects every /\u2026/mgmt/\u2026 REST endpoint decides whether to apply its check by calling request.getRequestURL().toString().contains(\"/mgmt/\"). Tomcat returns getRequestURL() un-decoded, while Spring MVC\u0027s DispatcherServlet routes on the decoded path. Requesting /serviceregistry/%6Dgmt/systems (%6D == m) therefore fails the substring check \u2014 the filter falls through without authorising \u2014 yet is decoded to /serviceregistry/mgmt/systems and dispatched to the management controller. Spring Security\u0027s StrictHttpFirewall (active via spring-boot-starter-security in arrowhead-common) only rejects encoded / \\ . % ; and null bytes, so percent-encoded ASCII letters pass through. Any authenticated system \u2014 regardless of privilege \u2014 can reach every management operation, including POST /authentication/mgmt/identities which creates new sysop accounts, yielding full administrative takeover of the local cloud."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV4_0": {
"Automatable": "NOT_DEFINED",
"Recovery": "NOT_DEFINED",
"Safety": "NOT_DEFINED",
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackRequirements": "PRESENT",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"baseScore": 8.9,
"baseSeverity": "HIGH",
"exploitMaturity": "NOT_DEFINED",
"privilegesRequired": "LOW",
"providerUrgency": "NOT_DEFINED",
"subAvailabilityImpact": "HIGH",
"subConfidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
"subIntegrityImpact": "HIGH",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"valueDensity": "NOT_DEFINED",
"vectorString": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:N/SC:H/SI:H/SA:H",
"version": "4.0",
"vulnAvailabilityImpact": "NONE",
"vulnConfidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
"vulnIntegrityImpact": "HIGH",
"vulnerabilityResponseEffort": "NOT_DEFINED"
},
"format": "CVSS",
"scenarios": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "GENERAL"
}
]
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-647",
"description": "CWE-647 Use of Non-Canonical URL paths for authorization decisions",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
},
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-863",
"description": "CWE-863 Incorrect Authorization",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-09-03T13:41:00.347Z",
"orgId": "e51fbebd-6053-4e49-959f-1b94eeb69a2c",
"shortName": "eclipse"
},
"references": [
{
"url": "https://gitlab.eclipse.org/security/vulnerability-reports/-/work_items/752"
}
],
"source": {
"discovery": "UNKNOWN"
},
"x_generator": {
"engine": "Vulnogram 1.0.5"
}
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "e51fbebd-6053-4e49-959f-1b94eeb69a2c",
"assignerShortName": "eclipse",
"cveId": "CVE-2026-80515",
"datePublished": "2026-09-03T13:41:00.347Z",
"dateReserved": "2026-08-26T14:21:43.506Z",
"dateUpdated": "2026-09-03T13:49:45.714Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2",
"vulnerability-lookup:meta": {
"epss": {
"cve": "CVE-2026-80515",
"date": "2026-11-15",
"epss": "0.0047",
"percentile": "0.41164"
},
"nvd": {
"cve": {
"affected": [
{
"affectedData": [
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "Eclipse Arrowhead",
"vendor": "Eclipse Foundation",
"versions": [
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "5.2.1",
"status": "affected",
"version": "5.0.0",
"versionType": "semver"
}
]
}
],
"source": "emo@eclipse.org"
}
],
"cveTags": [],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "In Eclipse Arrowhead versions from 5.0.0 to 5.2.1 the management-authorization gate that protects every /\u2026/mgmt/\u2026 REST endpoint decides whether to apply its check by calling request.getRequestURL().toString().contains(\"/mgmt/\"). Tomcat returns getRequestURL() un-decoded, while Spring MVC\u0027s DispatcherServlet routes on the decoded path. Requesting /serviceregistry/%6Dgmt/systems (%6D == m) therefore fails the substring check \u2014 the filter falls through without authorising \u2014 yet is decoded to /serviceregistry/mgmt/systems and dispatched to the management controller. Spring Security\u0027s StrictHttpFirewall (active via spring-boot-starter-security in arrowhead-common) only rejects encoded / \\ . % ; and null bytes, so percent-encoded ASCII letters pass through. Any authenticated system \u2014 regardless of privilege \u2014 can reach every management operation, including POST /authentication/mgmt/identities which creates new sysop accounts, yielding full administrative takeover of the local cloud."
}
],
"id": "CVE-2026-80515",
"lastModified": "2026-09-03T16:41:09.297",
"metrics": {
"cvssMetricV40": [
{
"cvssData": {
"Automatable": "NOT_DEFINED",
"Recovery": "NOT_DEFINED",
"Safety": "NOT_DEFINED",
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackRequirements": "PRESENT",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityRequirement": "NOT_DEFINED",
"baseScore": 8.9,
"baseSeverity": "HIGH",
"confidentialityRequirement": "NOT_DEFINED",
"exploitMaturity": "NOT_DEFINED",
"integrityRequirement": "NOT_DEFINED",
"modifiedAttackComplexity": "NOT_DEFINED",
"modifiedAttackRequirements": "NOT_DEFINED",
"modifiedAttackVector": "NOT_DEFINED",
"modifiedPrivilegesRequired": "NOT_DEFINED",
"modifiedSubAvailabilityImpact": "NOT_DEFINED",
"modifiedSubConfidentialityImpact": "NOT_DEFINED",
"modifiedSubIntegrityImpact": "NOT_DEFINED",
"modifiedUserInteraction": "NOT_DEFINED",
"modifiedVulnAvailabilityImpact": "NOT_DEFINED",
"modifiedVulnConfidentialityImpact": "NOT_DEFINED",
"modifiedVulnIntegrityImpact": "NOT_DEFINED",
"privilegesRequired": "LOW",
"providerUrgency": "NOT_DEFINED",
"subAvailabilityImpact": "HIGH",
"subConfidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
"subIntegrityImpact": "HIGH",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"valueDensity": "NOT_DEFINED",
"vectorString": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:N/SC:H/SI:H/SA:H/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X",
"version": "4.0",
"vulnAvailabilityImpact": "NONE",
"vulnConfidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
"vulnIntegrityImpact": "HIGH",
"vulnerabilityResponseEffort": "NOT_DEFINED"
},
"source": "emo@eclipse.org",
"type": "Secondary"
}
],
"ssvcV203": [
{
"source": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"ssvcData": {
"id": "CVE-2026-80515",
"options": [
{
"exploitation": "none"
},
{
"automatable": "no"
},
{
"technicalImpact": "total"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2026-09-03T13:49:38.746560Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
}
}
]
},
"published": "2026-09-03T14:17:01.830",
"references": [
{
"source": "emo@eclipse.org",
"url": "https://gitlab.eclipse.org/security/vulnerability-reports/-/work_items/752"
}
],
"sourceIdentifier": "emo@eclipse.org",
"vulnStatus": "Deferred",
"weaknesses": [
{
"description": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "CWE-647"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "CWE-863"
}
],
"source": "emo@eclipse.org",
"type": "Primary"
}
]
}
},
"vulnrichment": {
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2026-80515",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "none"
},
{
"Automatable": "no"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "total"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2026-09-03T13:49:38.746560Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-09-03T13:49:42.470Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "Eclipse Arrowhead",
"vendor": "Eclipse Foundation",
"versions": [
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "5.2.1",
"status": "affected",
"version": "5.0.0",
"versionType": "semver"
}
]
}
],
"credits": [
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "finder",
"value": "Eclipse Foundation Security Team"
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"supportingMedia": [
{
"base64": false,
"type": "text/html",
"value": "In Eclipse Arrowhead versions from 5.0.0 to 5.2.1 the management-authorization gate that protects every \u003ccode\u003e/\u2026/mgmt/\u2026\u003c/code\u003e REST endpoint decides whether to apply its check by calling \u003ccode\u003erequest.getRequestURL().toString().contains(\"/mgmt/\")\u003c/code\u003e. Tomcat returns \u003ccode\u003egetRequestURL()\u003c/code\u003e \u003cstrong\u003eun-decoded\u003c/strong\u003e, while Spring MVC\u0027s \u003ccode\u003eDispatcherServlet\u003c/code\u003e routes on the \u003cstrong\u003edecoded\u003c/strong\u003e path. Requesting \u003ccode\u003e/serviceregistry/%6Dgmt/systems\u003c/code\u003e (\u003ccode\u003e%6D\u003c/code\u003e == \u003ccode\u003em\u003c/code\u003e) therefore fails the substring check \u2014 the filter falls through without authorising \u2014 yet is decoded to \u003ccode\u003e/serviceregistry/mgmt/systems\u003c/code\u003e and dispatched to the management controller. Spring Security\u0027s \u003ccode\u003eStrictHttpFirewall\u003c/code\u003e (active via \u003ccode\u003espring-boot-starter-security\u003c/code\u003e in \u003ccode\u003earrowhead-common\u003c/code\u003e) only rejects encoded \u003ccode\u003e/ \\ . % ;\u003c/code\u003e and null bytes, so percent-encoded ASCII letters pass through. Any authenticated system \u2014 regardless of privilege \u2014 can reach every management operation, including \u003ccode\u003ePOST /authentication/mgmt/identities\u003c/code\u003e which creates new sysop accounts, yielding full administrative takeover of the local cloud."
}
],
"value": "In Eclipse Arrowhead versions from 5.0.0 to 5.2.1 the management-authorization gate that protects every /\u2026/mgmt/\u2026 REST endpoint decides whether to apply its check by calling request.getRequestURL().toString().contains(\"/mgmt/\"). Tomcat returns getRequestURL() un-decoded, while Spring MVC\u0027s DispatcherServlet routes on the decoded path. Requesting /serviceregistry/%6Dgmt/systems (%6D == m) therefore fails the substring check \u2014 the filter falls through without authorising \u2014 yet is decoded to /serviceregistry/mgmt/systems and dispatched to the management controller. Spring Security\u0027s StrictHttpFirewall (active via spring-boot-starter-security in arrowhead-common) only rejects encoded / \\ . % ; and null bytes, so percent-encoded ASCII letters pass through. Any authenticated system \u2014 regardless of privilege \u2014 can reach every management operation, including POST /authentication/mgmt/identities which creates new sysop accounts, yielding full administrative takeover of the local cloud."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV4_0": {
"Automatable": "NOT_DEFINED",
"Recovery": "NOT_DEFINED",
"Safety": "NOT_DEFINED",
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackRequirements": "PRESENT",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"baseScore": 8.9,
"baseSeverity": "HIGH",
"exploitMaturity": "NOT_DEFINED",
"privilegesRequired": "LOW",
"providerUrgency": "NOT_DEFINED",
"subAvailabilityImpact": "HIGH",
"subConfidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
"subIntegrityImpact": "HIGH",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"valueDensity": "NOT_DEFINED",
"vectorString": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:N/SC:H/SI:H/SA:H",
"version": "4.0",
"vulnAvailabilityImpact": "NONE",
"vulnConfidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
"vulnIntegrityImpact": "HIGH",
"vulnerabilityResponseEffort": "NOT_DEFINED"
},
"format": "CVSS",
"scenarios": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "GENERAL"
}
]
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-647",
"description": "CWE-647 Use of Non-Canonical URL paths for authorization decisions",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
},
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-863",
"description": "CWE-863 Incorrect Authorization",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-09-03T13:41:00.347Z",
"orgId": "e51fbebd-6053-4e49-959f-1b94eeb69a2c",
"shortName": "eclipse"
},
"references": [
{
"url": "https://gitlab.eclipse.org/security/vulnerability-reports/-/work_items/752"
}
],
"source": {
"discovery": "UNKNOWN"
},
"x_generator": {
"engine": "Vulnogram 1.0.5"
}
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "e51fbebd-6053-4e49-959f-1b94eeb69a2c",
"assignerShortName": "eclipse",
"cveId": "CVE-2026-80515",
"datePublished": "2026-09-03T13:41:00.347Z",
"dateReserved": "2026-08-26T14:21:43.506Z",
"dateUpdated": "2026-09-03T13:49:45.714Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2"
}
}
}
Drag nodes to arrange them. Double-click a related vulnerability to open it, or a source to visit its link. The Physics button on the left tunes the layout and the simulation; the legend at the bottom left hides or shows nodes by kind and by sighting type.
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date | Other |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Vulnerability timeline
Sightings and recorded dates, grouped by day · UTC
How durations are calculated
Following the VTEM framework (Black Hat USA 2015), time to patch starts when the vendor or a coordinator was informed, total time to patch at discovery, and disclosure to patch at public disclosure; vendor response time runs from the report to its acknowledgement. Time to exploit and time unpatched start at the earliest discovery or report, falling back to public disclosure. Unpatched time ends at the first recorded patch, or the calculation time when no patch is recorded. Exploitation to patch shows the interval between those two events; a published proof of concept is a public exploit, not exploitation.
Each result shows its source dates. A negative interval means the end event came first; when date-only inputs leave the order open, the result says so. Date-only inputs are approximate. The earliest evidence wins: KEV report dates and sightings are labelled as such. Records describing another vulnerability are listed but never calculated from, and a PoC alone does not establish exploitation. Missing patch evidence does not prove that no patch exists. Filters below change the event list only.
Loading timeline…
The approach is described in our paper Mapping CVEs to MITRE ATT&CK Techniques: A Curated Gold-Set Classifier and the Limits of LLM-Assisted Label Expansion.
Browse all ATT&CK techniques and the vulnerabilities related to each.
Related by attack behaviour
Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.