CVE-2026-77866 (GCVE-0-2026-77866)

Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2026-09-15 15:38 – Updated: 2026-09-21 18:44
VLAI
Title
SSRF protection bypass in safeurl via IPv6 addresses and unresolvable hosts
Summary
Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in Slab safeurl allows an attacker who controls a validated URL to reach internal network destinations the library is configured to block. Only IPv4 addresses are matched against the reserved ranges and the blocklist. Every other address is treated as matching nothing, so a destination that is rejected in its IPv4 form is accepted when written as an IPv6 address, IPv6 entries in the blocklist never match, and a host that resolves to no IPv4 address is accepted regardless of where it points. Deployments that rely on the allowlist instead are unaffected, because there an unmatched address is rejected. This issue affects safeurl: from 0.1.0 onward.
SSVC
Exploitation: none Automatable: no Technical Impact: partial
CISA Coordinator · CISA-ADP (v2.0.3)
Decision recorded 2026-09-21 18:44 UTC
CWE
  • CWE-918 - Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF)
  • CWE-636 - Not Failing Securely ('Failing Open')
Assigner
EEF CNA under the mitre root
CNA scorecard A 97/100 over 352 records in the last 180 days details
Impacted products
Vendor Product Version CPE status
Slab safeurl Affected: 0.1.0 , < * (semver)
    cpe:2.3:a:slab:safeurl:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
Create a notification for this product.
Slab safeurl Affected: feabbd0a13f83028ab24b71710526e9da9841f70 , < * (git)
    cpe:2.3:a:slab:safeurl:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
Create a notification for this product.
Date Public
2026-09-15 15:38
Show details on NVD website

{
  "containers": {
    "adp": [
      {
        "metrics": [
          {
            "other": {
              "content": {
                "id": "CVE-2026-77866",
                "options": [
                  {
                    "Exploitation": "none"
                  },
                  {
                    "Automatable": "no"
                  },
                  {
                    "Technical Impact": "partial"
                  }
                ],
                "role": "CISA Coordinator",
                "timestamp": "2026-09-21T18:44:46.837335Z",
                "version": "2.0.3"
              },
              "type": "ssvc"
            }
          }
        ],
        "providerMetadata": {
          "dateUpdated": "2026-09-21T18:44:55.257Z",
          "orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
          "shortName": "CISA-ADP"
        },
        "title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
      }
    ],
    "cna": {
      "affected": [
        {
          "collectionURL": "https://repo.hex.pm",
          "cpes": [
            "cpe:2.3:a:slab:safeurl:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*"
          ],
          "defaultStatus": "unaffected",
          "modules": [
            "\u0027Elixir.SafeURL\u0027"
          ],
          "packageName": "safeurl",
          "packageURL": "pkg:hex/safeurl",
          "product": "safeurl",
          "programFiles": [
            "lib/safeurl/safeurl.ex"
          ],
          "programRoutines": [
            {
              "name": "\u0027Elixir.SafeURL\u0027:validate/2"
            },
            {
              "name": "\u0027Elixir.SafeURL\u0027:allowed?/2"
            }
          ],
          "repo": "https://github.com/slab/safeurl-elixir",
          "vendor": "Slab",
          "versions": [
            {
              "lessThan": "*",
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "0.1.0",
              "versionType": "semver"
            }
          ]
        },
        {
          "collectionURL": "https://github.com",
          "cpes": [
            "cpe:2.3:a:slab:safeurl:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*"
          ],
          "defaultStatus": "unaffected",
          "modules": [
            "\u0027Elixir.SafeURL\u0027"
          ],
          "packageName": "slab/safeurl-elixir",
          "packageURL": "pkg:github/slab/safeurl-elixir",
          "product": "safeurl",
          "programFiles": [
            "lib/safeurl/safeurl.ex"
          ],
          "programRoutines": [
            {
              "name": "\u0027Elixir.SafeURL\u0027:validate/2"
            },
            {
              "name": "\u0027Elixir.SafeURL\u0027:allowed?/2"
            }
          ],
          "repo": "https://github.com/slab/safeurl-elixir",
          "vendor": "Slab",
          "versions": [
            {
              "lessThan": "*",
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "feabbd0a13f83028ab24b71710526e9da9841f70",
              "versionType": "git"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "cpeApplicability": [
        {
          "nodes": [
            {
              "cpeMatch": [
                {
                  "criteria": "cpe:2.3:a:slab:safeurl:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
                  "versionStartIncluding": "0.1.0",
                  "vulnerable": true
                }
              ],
              "negate": false,
              "operator": "OR"
            }
          ],
          "operator": "AND"
        }
      ],
      "credits": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "type": "reporter",
          "value": "Mathias Polligkeit"
        },
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "type": "coordinator",
          "value": "Jonatan M\u00e4nnchen / EEF"
        }
      ],
      "datePublic": "2026-09-15T15:38:16.000Z",
      "descriptions": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "supportingMedia": [
            {
              "base64": false,
              "type": "text/html",
              "value": "\u003cp\u003eServer-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in Slab safeurl allows an attacker who controls a validated URL to reach internal network destinations the library is configured to block.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eOnly IPv4 addresses are matched against the reserved ranges and the blocklist. Every other address is treated as matching nothing, so a destination that is rejected in its IPv4 form is accepted when written as an IPv6 address, IPv6 entries in the blocklist never match, and a host that resolves to no IPv4 address is accepted regardless of where it points. Deployments that rely on the allowlist instead are unaffected, because there an unmatched address is rejected.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eThis issue affects safeurl: from 0.1.0 onward.\u003c/p\u003e"
            },
            {
              "base64": false,
              "type": "text/markdown",
              "value": "Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in Slab safeurl allows an attacker who controls a validated URL to reach internal network destinations the library is configured to block.\n\nOnly IPv4 addresses are matched against the reserved ranges and the blocklist. Every other address is treated as matching nothing, so a destination that is rejected in its IPv4 form is accepted when written as an IPv6 address, IPv6 entries in the blocklist never match, and a host that resolves to no IPv4 address is accepted regardless of where it points. Deployments that rely on the allowlist instead are unaffected, because there an unmatched address is rejected.\n\nThis issue affects safeurl: from 0.1.0 onward."
            }
          ],
          "value": "Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in Slab safeurl allows an attacker who controls a validated URL to reach internal network destinations the library is configured to block.\n\nOnly IPv4 addresses are matched against the reserved ranges and the blocklist. Every other address is treated as matching nothing, so a destination that is rejected in its IPv4 form is accepted when written as an IPv6 address, IPv6 entries in the blocklist never match, and a host that resolves to no IPv4 address is accepted regardless of where it points. Deployments that rely on the allowlist instead are unaffected, because there an unmatched address is rejected.\n\nThis issue affects safeurl: from 0.1.0 onward."
        }
      ],
      "impacts": [
        {
          "capecId": "CAPEC-664",
          "descriptions": [
            {
              "lang": "en",
              "value": "CAPEC-664 Server Side Request Forgery"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "metrics": [
        {
          "cvssV4_0": {
            "Automatable": "NOT_DEFINED",
            "Recovery": "NOT_DEFINED",
            "Safety": "NOT_DEFINED",
            "attackComplexity": "LOW",
            "attackRequirements": "PRESENT",
            "attackVector": "NETWORK",
            "baseScore": 9,
            "baseSeverity": "CRITICAL",
            "privilegesRequired": "NONE",
            "providerUrgency": "NOT_DEFINED",
            "subAvailabilityImpact": "NONE",
            "subConfidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
            "subIntegrityImpact": "LOW",
            "userInteraction": "NONE",
            "valueDensity": "NOT_DEFINED",
            "vectorString": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:L/VA:N/SC:H/SI:L/SA:N",
            "version": "4.0",
            "vulnAvailabilityImpact": "NONE",
            "vulnConfidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
            "vulnIntegrityImpact": "LOW",
            "vulnerabilityResponseEffort": "NOT_DEFINED"
          },
          "format": "CVSS",
          "scenarios": [
            {
              "lang": "en",
              "value": "GENERAL"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "problemTypes": [
        {
          "descriptions": [
            {
              "cweId": "CWE-918",
              "description": "CWE-918 Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF)",
              "lang": "en",
              "type": "CWE"
            }
          ]
        },
        {
          "descriptions": [
            {
              "cweId": "CWE-636",
              "description": "CWE-636 Not Failing Securely (\u0027Failing Open\u0027)",
              "lang": "en",
              "type": "CWE"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "providerMetadata": {
        "dateUpdated": "2026-09-15T15:39:37.321Z",
        "orgId": "6b3ad84c-e1a6-4bf7-a703-f496b71e49db",
        "shortName": "EEF"
      },
      "references": [
        {
          "name": "EEF CNA record for CVE-2026-77866",
          "tags": [
            "related",
            "third-party-advisory"
          ],
          "url": "https://cna.erlef.org/cves/CVE-2026-77866.html"
        },
        {
          "name": "OSV record EEF-CVE-2026-77866",
          "tags": [
            "related"
          ],
          "url": "https://osv.dev/vulnerability/EEF-CVE-2026-77866"
        },
        {
          "name": "Introducing commit feabbd0 in slab/safeurl-elixir",
          "tags": [
            "related"
          ],
          "url": "https://github.com/slab/safeurl-elixir/commit/feabbd0a13f83028ab24b71710526e9da9841f70"
        }
      ],
      "source": {
        "discovery": "EXTERNAL"
      },
      "title": "SSRF protection bypass in safeurl via IPv6 addresses and unresolvable hosts"
    }
  },
  "cveMetadata": {
    "assignerOrgId": "6b3ad84c-e1a6-4bf7-a703-f496b71e49db",
    "assignerShortName": "EEF",
    "cveId": "CVE-2026-77866",
    "datePublished": "2026-09-15T15:38:15.886Z",
    "dateReserved": "2026-08-30T00:00:01.985Z",
    "dateUpdated": "2026-09-21T18:44:55.257Z",
    "state": "PUBLISHED"
  },
  "dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
  "dataVersion": "5.2",
  "vulnerability-lookup:meta": {
    "epss": {
      "cve": "CVE-2026-77866",
      "date": "2026-11-11",
      "epss": "0.0048",
      "percentile": "0.41884"
    },
    "nvd": {
      "cve": {
        "affected": [
          {
            "affectedData": [
              {
                "collectionURL": "https://repo.hex.pm",
                "cpes": [
                  "cpe:2.3:a:slab:safeurl:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*"
                ],
                "defaultStatus": "unaffected",
                "modules": [
                  "\u0027Elixir.SafeURL\u0027"
                ],
                "packageName": "safeurl",
                "packageURL": "pkg:hex/safeurl",
                "product": "safeurl",
                "programFiles": [
                  "lib/safeurl/safeurl.ex"
                ],
                "programRoutines": [
                  {
                    "name": "\u0027Elixir.SafeURL\u0027:validate/2"
                  },
                  {
                    "name": "\u0027Elixir.SafeURL\u0027:allowed?/2"
                  }
                ],
                "repo": "https://github.com/slab/safeurl-elixir",
                "vendor": "Slab",
                "versions": [
                  {
                    "lessThan": "*",
                    "status": "affected",
                    "version": "0.1.0",
                    "versionType": "semver"
                  }
                ]
              },
              {
                "collectionURL": "https://github.com",
                "cpes": [
                  "cpe:2.3:a:slab:safeurl:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*"
                ],
                "defaultStatus": "unaffected",
                "modules": [
                  "\u0027Elixir.SafeURL\u0027"
                ],
                "packageName": "slab/safeurl-elixir",
                "packageURL": "pkg:github/slab/safeurl-elixir",
                "product": "safeurl",
                "programFiles": [
                  "lib/safeurl/safeurl.ex"
                ],
                "programRoutines": [
                  {
                    "name": "\u0027Elixir.SafeURL\u0027:validate/2"
                  },
                  {
                    "name": "\u0027Elixir.SafeURL\u0027:allowed?/2"
                  }
                ],
                "repo": "https://github.com/slab/safeurl-elixir",
                "vendor": "Slab",
                "versions": [
                  {
                    "lessThan": "*",
                    "status": "affected",
                    "version": "feabbd0a13f83028ab24b71710526e9da9841f70",
                    "versionType": "git"
                  }
                ]
              }
            ],
            "source": "6b3ad84c-e1a6-4bf7-a703-f496b71e49db"
          }
        ],
        "cveTags": [],
        "descriptions": [
          {
            "lang": "en",
            "value": "Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in Slab safeurl allows an attacker who controls a validated URL to reach internal network destinations the library is configured to block.\n\nOnly IPv4 addresses are matched against the reserved ranges and the blocklist. Every other address is treated as matching nothing, so a destination that is rejected in its IPv4 form is accepted when written as an IPv6 address, IPv6 entries in the blocklist never match, and a host that resolves to no IPv4 address is accepted regardless of where it points. Deployments that rely on the allowlist instead are unaffected, because there an unmatched address is rejected.\n\nThis issue affects safeurl: from 0.1.0 onward."
          }
        ],
        "id": "CVE-2026-77866",
        "lastModified": "2026-09-21T19:17:10.973",
        "metrics": {
          "cvssMetricV40": [
            {
              "cvssData": {
                "Automatable": "NOT_DEFINED",
                "Recovery": "NOT_DEFINED",
                "Safety": "NOT_DEFINED",
                "attackComplexity": "LOW",
                "attackRequirements": "PRESENT",
                "attackVector": "NETWORK",
                "availabilityRequirement": "NOT_DEFINED",
                "baseScore": 9.0,
                "baseSeverity": "CRITICAL",
                "confidentialityRequirement": "NOT_DEFINED",
                "exploitMaturity": "NOT_DEFINED",
                "integrityRequirement": "NOT_DEFINED",
                "modifiedAttackComplexity": "NOT_DEFINED",
                "modifiedAttackRequirements": "NOT_DEFINED",
                "modifiedAttackVector": "NOT_DEFINED",
                "modifiedPrivilegesRequired": "NOT_DEFINED",
                "modifiedSubAvailabilityImpact": "NOT_DEFINED",
                "modifiedSubConfidentialityImpact": "NOT_DEFINED",
                "modifiedSubIntegrityImpact": "NOT_DEFINED",
                "modifiedUserInteraction": "NOT_DEFINED",
                "modifiedVulnAvailabilityImpact": "NOT_DEFINED",
                "modifiedVulnConfidentialityImpact": "NOT_DEFINED",
                "modifiedVulnIntegrityImpact": "NOT_DEFINED",
                "privilegesRequired": "NONE",
                "providerUrgency": "NOT_DEFINED",
                "subAvailabilityImpact": "NONE",
                "subConfidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
                "subIntegrityImpact": "LOW",
                "userInteraction": "NONE",
                "valueDensity": "NOT_DEFINED",
                "vectorString": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:L/VA:N/SC:H/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X",
                "version": "4.0",
                "vulnAvailabilityImpact": "NONE",
                "vulnConfidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
                "vulnIntegrityImpact": "LOW",
                "vulnerabilityResponseEffort": "NOT_DEFINED"
              },
              "source": "6b3ad84c-e1a6-4bf7-a703-f496b71e49db",
              "type": "Secondary"
            }
          ],
          "ssvcV203": [
            {
              "source": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
              "ssvcData": {
                "id": "CVE-2026-77866",
                "options": [
                  {
                    "exploitation": "none"
                  },
                  {
                    "automatable": "no"
                  },
                  {
                    "technicalImpact": "partial"
                  }
                ],
                "role": "CISA Coordinator",
                "timestamp": "2026-09-21T18:44:46.837335Z",
                "version": "2.0.3"
              }
            }
          ]
        },
        "published": "2026-09-15T16:17:24.117",
        "references": [
          {
            "source": "6b3ad84c-e1a6-4bf7-a703-f496b71e49db",
            "url": "https://cna.erlef.org/cves/CVE-2026-77866.html"
          },
          {
            "source": "6b3ad84c-e1a6-4bf7-a703-f496b71e49db",
            "url": "https://github.com/slab/safeurl-elixir/commit/feabbd0a13f83028ab24b71710526e9da9841f70"
          },
          {
            "source": "6b3ad84c-e1a6-4bf7-a703-f496b71e49db",
            "url": "https://osv.dev/vulnerability/EEF-CVE-2026-77866"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIdentifier": "6b3ad84c-e1a6-4bf7-a703-f496b71e49db",
        "vulnStatus": "Awaiting Analysis",
        "weaknesses": [
          {
            "description": [
              {
                "lang": "en",
                "value": "CWE-636"
              },
              {
                "lang": "en",
                "value": "CWE-918"
              }
            ],
            "source": "6b3ad84c-e1a6-4bf7-a703-f496b71e49db",
            "type": "Secondary"
          }
        ]
      }
    },
    "vulnrichment": {
      "containers": {
        "adp": [
          {
            "metrics": [
              {
                "other": {
                  "content": {
                    "id": "CVE-2026-77866",
                    "options": [
                      {
                        "Exploitation": "none"
                      },
                      {
                        "Automatable": "no"
                      },
                      {
                        "Technical Impact": "partial"
                      }
                    ],
                    "role": "CISA Coordinator",
                    "timestamp": "2026-09-21T18:44:46.837335Z",
                    "version": "2.0.3"
                  },
                  "type": "ssvc"
                }
              }
            ],
            "providerMetadata": {
              "dateUpdated": "2026-09-21T18:44:52.163Z",
              "orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
              "shortName": "CISA-ADP"
            },
            "title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
          }
        ],
        "cna": {
          "affected": [
            {
              "collectionURL": "https://repo.hex.pm",
              "cpes": [
                "cpe:2.3:a:slab:safeurl:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*"
              ],
              "defaultStatus": "unaffected",
              "modules": [
                "\u0027Elixir.SafeURL\u0027"
              ],
              "packageName": "safeurl",
              "packageURL": "pkg:hex/safeurl",
              "product": "safeurl",
              "programFiles": [
                "lib/safeurl/safeurl.ex"
              ],
              "programRoutines": [
                {
                  "name": "\u0027Elixir.SafeURL\u0027:validate/2"
                },
                {
                  "name": "\u0027Elixir.SafeURL\u0027:allowed?/2"
                }
              ],
              "repo": "https://github.com/slab/safeurl-elixir",
              "vendor": "Slab",
              "versions": [
                {
                  "lessThan": "*",
                  "status": "affected",
                  "version": "0.1.0",
                  "versionType": "semver"
                }
              ]
            },
            {
              "collectionURL": "https://github.com",
              "cpes": [
                "cpe:2.3:a:slab:safeurl:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*"
              ],
              "defaultStatus": "unaffected",
              "modules": [
                "\u0027Elixir.SafeURL\u0027"
              ],
              "packageName": "slab/safeurl-elixir",
              "packageURL": "pkg:github/slab/safeurl-elixir",
              "product": "safeurl",
              "programFiles": [
                "lib/safeurl/safeurl.ex"
              ],
              "programRoutines": [
                {
                  "name": "\u0027Elixir.SafeURL\u0027:validate/2"
                },
                {
                  "name": "\u0027Elixir.SafeURL\u0027:allowed?/2"
                }
              ],
              "repo": "https://github.com/slab/safeurl-elixir",
              "vendor": "Slab",
              "versions": [
                {
                  "lessThan": "*",
                  "status": "affected",
                  "version": "feabbd0a13f83028ab24b71710526e9da9841f70",
                  "versionType": "git"
                }
              ]
            }
          ],
          "cpeApplicability": [
            {
              "nodes": [
                {
                  "cpeMatch": [
                    {
                      "criteria": "cpe:2.3:a:slab:safeurl:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
                      "versionStartIncluding": "0.1.0",
                      "vulnerable": true
                    }
                  ],
                  "negate": false,
                  "operator": "OR"
                }
              ],
              "operator": "AND"
            }
          ],
          "credits": [
            {
              "lang": "en",
              "type": "reporter",
              "value": "Mathias Polligkeit"
            },
            {
              "lang": "en",
              "type": "coordinator",
              "value": "Jonatan M\u00e4nnchen / EEF"
            }
          ],
          "datePublic": "2026-09-15T15:38:16.000Z",
          "descriptions": [
            {
              "lang": "en",
              "supportingMedia": [
                {
                  "base64": false,
                  "type": "text/html",
                  "value": "\u003cp\u003eServer-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in Slab safeurl allows an attacker who controls a validated URL to reach internal network destinations the library is configured to block.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eOnly IPv4 addresses are matched against the reserved ranges and the blocklist. Every other address is treated as matching nothing, so a destination that is rejected in its IPv4 form is accepted when written as an IPv6 address, IPv6 entries in the blocklist never match, and a host that resolves to no IPv4 address is accepted regardless of where it points. Deployments that rely on the allowlist instead are unaffected, because there an unmatched address is rejected.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eThis issue affects safeurl: from 0.1.0 onward.\u003c/p\u003e"
                },
                {
                  "base64": false,
                  "type": "text/markdown",
                  "value": "Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in Slab safeurl allows an attacker who controls a validated URL to reach internal network destinations the library is configured to block.\n\nOnly IPv4 addresses are matched against the reserved ranges and the blocklist. Every other address is treated as matching nothing, so a destination that is rejected in its IPv4 form is accepted when written as an IPv6 address, IPv6 entries in the blocklist never match, and a host that resolves to no IPv4 address is accepted regardless of where it points. Deployments that rely on the allowlist instead are unaffected, because there an unmatched address is rejected.\n\nThis issue affects safeurl: from 0.1.0 onward."
                }
              ],
              "value": "Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in Slab safeurl allows an attacker who controls a validated URL to reach internal network destinations the library is configured to block.\n\nOnly IPv4 addresses are matched against the reserved ranges and the blocklist. Every other address is treated as matching nothing, so a destination that is rejected in its IPv4 form is accepted when written as an IPv6 address, IPv6 entries in the blocklist never match, and a host that resolves to no IPv4 address is accepted regardless of where it points. Deployments that rely on the allowlist instead are unaffected, because there an unmatched address is rejected.\n\nThis issue affects safeurl: from 0.1.0 onward."
            }
          ],
          "impacts": [
            {
              "capecId": "CAPEC-664",
              "descriptions": [
                {
                  "lang": "en",
                  "value": "CAPEC-664 Server Side Request Forgery"
                }
              ]
            }
          ],
          "metrics": [
            {
              "cvssV4_0": {
                "Automatable": "NOT_DEFINED",
                "Recovery": "NOT_DEFINED",
                "Safety": "NOT_DEFINED",
                "attackComplexity": "LOW",
                "attackRequirements": "PRESENT",
                "attackVector": "NETWORK",
                "baseScore": 9,
                "baseSeverity": "CRITICAL",
                "privilegesRequired": "NONE",
                "providerUrgency": "NOT_DEFINED",
                "subAvailabilityImpact": "NONE",
                "subConfidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
                "subIntegrityImpact": "LOW",
                "userInteraction": "NONE",
                "valueDensity": "NOT_DEFINED",
                "vectorString": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:L/VA:N/SC:H/SI:L/SA:N",
                "version": "4.0",
                "vulnAvailabilityImpact": "NONE",
                "vulnConfidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
                "vulnIntegrityImpact": "LOW",
                "vulnerabilityResponseEffort": "NOT_DEFINED"
              },
              "format": "CVSS",
              "scenarios": [
                {
                  "lang": "en",
                  "value": "GENERAL"
                }
              ]
            }
          ],
          "problemTypes": [
            {
              "descriptions": [
                {
                  "cweId": "CWE-918",
                  "description": "CWE-918 Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF)",
                  "lang": "en",
                  "type": "CWE"
                }
              ]
            },
            {
              "descriptions": [
                {
                  "cweId": "CWE-636",
                  "description": "CWE-636 Not Failing Securely (\u0027Failing Open\u0027)",
                  "lang": "en",
                  "type": "CWE"
                }
              ]
            }
          ],
          "providerMetadata": {
            "dateUpdated": "2026-09-15T15:39:37.321Z",
            "orgId": "6b3ad84c-e1a6-4bf7-a703-f496b71e49db",
            "shortName": "EEF"
          },
          "references": [
            {
              "name": "EEF CNA record for CVE-2026-77866",
              "tags": [
                "related",
                "third-party-advisory"
              ],
              "url": "https://cna.erlef.org/cves/CVE-2026-77866.html"
            },
            {
              "name": "OSV record EEF-CVE-2026-77866",
              "tags": [
                "related"
              ],
              "url": "https://osv.dev/vulnerability/EEF-CVE-2026-77866"
            },
            {
              "name": "Introducing commit feabbd0 in slab/safeurl-elixir",
              "tags": [
                "related"
              ],
              "url": "https://github.com/slab/safeurl-elixir/commit/feabbd0a13f83028ab24b71710526e9da9841f70"
            }
          ],
          "source": {
            "discovery": "EXTERNAL"
          },
          "title": "SSRF protection bypass in safeurl via IPv6 addresses and unresolvable hosts"
        }
      },
      "cveMetadata": {
        "assignerOrgId": "6b3ad84c-e1a6-4bf7-a703-f496b71e49db",
        "assignerShortName": "EEF",
        "cveId": "CVE-2026-77866",
        "datePublished": "2026-09-15T15:38:15.886Z",
        "dateReserved": "2026-08-30T00:00:01.985Z",
        "dateUpdated": "2026-09-21T18:44:55.257Z",
        "state": "PUBLISHED"
      },
      "dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
      "dataVersion": "5.2"
    }
  }
}



Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Drag nodes to arrange them. Double-click a related vulnerability to open it, or a source to visit its link. The Physics button on the left tunes the layout and the simulation; the legend at the bottom left hides or shows nodes by kind and by sighting type.

Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Vulnerability timeline

Sightings and recorded dates, grouped by day · UTC

JSON
How durations are calculated

Following the VTEM framework (Black Hat USA 2015), time to patch starts when the vendor or a coordinator was informed, total time to patch at discovery, and disclosure to patch at public disclosure; vendor response time runs from the report to its acknowledgement. Time to exploit and time unpatched start at the earliest discovery or report, falling back to public disclosure. Unpatched time ends at the first recorded patch, or the calculation time when no patch is recorded. Exploitation to patch shows the interval between those two events; a published proof of concept is a public exploit, not exploitation.

Each result shows its source dates. A negative interval means the end event came first; when date-only inputs leave the order open, the result says so. Date-only inputs are approximate. The earliest evidence wins: KEV report dates and sightings are labelled as such. Records describing another vulnerability are listed but never calculated from, and a PoC alone does not establish exploitation. Missing patch evidence does not prove that no patch exists. Filters below change the event list only.

Events included in the timeline

Loading timeline…


    Loading…

    Loading…

    Loading…

    Related by attack behaviour

    Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.