CVE-2026-71242 (GCVE-0-2026-71242)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2026-08-05 10:56 – Updated: 2026-08-05 12:52
VLAI
EPSS
VEX
Title
Crater: Cross-Company IDOR on Notes via Missing Company-Ownership Check in NotePolicy
Summary
Crater's NotePolicy checks only a blanket Bouncer ability (manage-all-notes / view-all-notes) with no company-ownership comparison, unlike InvoicePolicy and other sibling policies which additionally verify $user->hasCompany($model->company_id). NotesController's show(), update(), and destroy() actions authorize via $this->authorize('view notes'/'manage notes') without passing the target Note model, and Note's company-scoping (scopeWhereCompany) is applied only in the list endpoint, not in show/update/destroy. Any authenticated user of one company can read, edit, or delete another company's notes by ID. This is a distinct finding from the previously reported CustomerPolicy company-ownership omission (a different policy class and controller).
Severity
8.2 (High)
SSVC
Exploitation: none
Automatable: no
Technical Impact: total
CISA Coordinator (v2.0.3)
CWE
- CWE-639 - Authorization Bypass Through User-Controlled Key
Assigner
References
1 reference
Impacted products
1 product
| Vendor | Product | Version | |
|---|---|---|---|
| crater-invoice | crater |
Affected:
6.0.6
|
Credits
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2026-71242",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "none"
},
{
"Automatable": "no"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "total"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2026-08-05T12:52:14.504719Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-08-05T12:52:20.107Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"defaultStatus": "unknown",
"product": "crater",
"programFiles": [
"app/Policies/NotePolicy.php",
"app/Http/Controllers/V1/Admin/General/NotesController.php"
],
"vendor": "crater-invoice",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "6.0.6"
}
]
}
],
"credits": [
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "finder",
"value": "Bobur Abdugafforov"
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "Crater\u0027s NotePolicy checks only a blanket Bouncer ability (manage-all-notes / view-all-notes) with no company-ownership comparison, unlike InvoicePolicy and other sibling policies which additionally verify $user-\u003ehasCompany($model-\u003ecompany_id). NotesController\u0027s show(), update(), and destroy() actions authorize via $this-\u003eauthorize(\u0027view notes\u0027/\u0027manage notes\u0027) without passing the target Note model, and Note\u0027s company-scoping (scopeWhereCompany) is applied only in the list endpoint, not in show/update/destroy. Any authenticated user of one company can read, edit, or delete another company\u0027s notes by ID. This is a distinct finding from the previously reported CustomerPolicy company-ownership omission (a different policy class and controller)."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"baseScore": 8.2,
"baseSeverity": "HIGH",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:L",
"version": "3.1"
}
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-639",
"description": "CWE-639 Authorization Bypass Through User-Controlled Key",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-08-05T10:56:45.498Z",
"orgId": "309f9ea4-e3e9-4c6c-b79d-e8eb01244f2c",
"shortName": "TuranSec"
},
"references": [
{
"url": "https://github.com/crater-invoice/crater"
}
],
"title": "Crater: Cross-Company IDOR on Notes via Missing Company-Ownership Check in NotePolicy"
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "309f9ea4-e3e9-4c6c-b79d-e8eb01244f2c",
"assignerShortName": "TuranSec",
"cveId": "CVE-2026-71242",
"datePublished": "2026-08-05T10:56:45.498Z",
"dateReserved": "2026-08-05T10:53:53.176Z",
"dateUpdated": "2026-08-05T12:52:20.107Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2"
}
Loading…
Loading…
Experimental. This forecast is provided for visualization only and may change without notice. Do not use it for operational decisions.
Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date | Other |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…