CVE-2026-7058 (GCVE-0-2026-7058)

Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2026-04-26 19:45 – Updated: 2026-04-27 13:04
VLAI
Title
666ghj MiroFish Inter-Process Communication simulation_ipc.py SimulationIPCClient.send_command command injection
Summary
A vulnerability has been found in 666ghj MiroFish up to 0.1.2. The impacted element is the function SimulationIPCClient.send_command of the file backend/app/services/simulation_ipc.py of the component Inter-Process Communication. Such manipulation leads to command injection. It is possible to launch the attack remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used. The project was informed of the problem early through an issue report but has not responded yet.
SSVC
Exploitation: poc Automatable: yes Technical Impact: partial
CISA Coordinator (v2.0.3)
CWE
Assigner
References
URL Tags
https://vuldb.com/vuln/359631 vdb-entrytechnical-description
https://vuldb.com/vuln/359631/cti signaturepermissions-required
https://vuldb.com/submit/798603 third-party-advisory
https://github.com/666ghj/MiroFish/issues/488 exploitissue-tracking
https://github.com/666ghj/MiroFish/ product
Impacted products
Vendor Product Version
666ghj MiroFish Affected: 0.1.0
Affected: 0.1.1
Affected: 0.1.2
Create a notification for this product.
Credits
York Shen (VulDB User) VulDB CNA Team
Show details on NVD website

{
  "containers": {
    "adp": [
      {
        "metrics": [
          {
            "other": {
              "content": {
                "id": "CVE-2026-7058",
                "options": [
                  {
                    "Exploitation": "poc"
                  },
                  {
                    "Automatable": "yes"
                  },
                  {
                    "Technical Impact": "partial"
                  }
                ],
                "role": "CISA Coordinator",
                "timestamp": "2026-04-27T13:04:03.790224Z",
                "version": "2.0.3"
              },
              "type": "ssvc"
            }
          }
        ],
        "providerMetadata": {
          "dateUpdated": "2026-04-27T13:04:10.866Z",
          "orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
          "shortName": "CISA-ADP"
        },
        "title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
      }
    ],
    "cna": {
      "affected": [
        {
          "modules": [
            "Inter-Process Communication"
          ],
          "product": "MiroFish",
          "vendor": "666ghj",
          "versions": [
            {
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "0.1.0"
            },
            {
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "0.1.1"
            },
            {
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "0.1.2"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "credits": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "type": "reporter",
          "value": "York Shen (VulDB User)"
        },
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "type": "coordinator",
          "value": "VulDB CNA Team"
        }
      ],
      "descriptions": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "value": "A vulnerability has been found in 666ghj MiroFish up to 0.1.2. The impacted element is the function SimulationIPCClient.send_command of the file backend/app/services/simulation_ipc.py of the component Inter-Process Communication. Such manipulation leads to command injection. It is possible to launch the attack remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used. The project was informed of the problem early through an issue report but has not responded yet."
        }
      ],
      "metrics": [
        {
          "cvssV4_0": {
            "baseScore": 6.9,
            "baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
            "vectorString": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P",
            "version": "4.0"
          }
        },
        {
          "cvssV3_1": {
            "baseScore": 7.3,
            "baseSeverity": "HIGH",
            "vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L/E:P/RL:X/RC:R",
            "version": "3.1"
          }
        },
        {
          "cvssV3_0": {
            "baseScore": 7.3,
            "baseSeverity": "HIGH",
            "vectorString": "CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L/E:P/RL:X/RC:R",
            "version": "3.0"
          }
        },
        {
          "cvssV2_0": {
            "baseScore": 7.5,
            "vectorString": "AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:P/E:POC/RL:ND/RC:UR",
            "version": "2.0"
          }
        }
      ],
      "problemTypes": [
        {
          "descriptions": [
            {
              "cweId": "CWE-77",
              "description": "Command Injection",
              "lang": "en",
              "type": "CWE"
            }
          ]
        },
        {
          "descriptions": [
            {
              "cweId": "CWE-74",
              "description": "Injection",
              "lang": "en",
              "type": "CWE"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "providerMetadata": {
        "dateUpdated": "2026-04-26T19:45:13.188Z",
        "orgId": "1af790b2-7ee1-4545-860a-a788eba489b5",
        "shortName": "VulDB"
      },
      "references": [
        {
          "name": "VDB-359631 | 666ghj MiroFish Inter-Process Communication simulation_ipc.py SimulationIPCClient.send_command command injection",
          "tags": [
            "vdb-entry",
            "technical-description"
          ],
          "url": "https://vuldb.com/vuln/359631"
        },
        {
          "name": "VDB-359631 | CTI Indicators (IOB, IOC, TTP, IOA)",
          "tags": [
            "signature",
            "permissions-required"
          ],
          "url": "https://vuldb.com/vuln/359631/cti"
        },
        {
          "name": "Submit #798603 | 666ghj MiroFish 0.1.2 Cross-Tenant IPC Command Injection",
          "tags": [
            "third-party-advisory"
          ],
          "url": "https://vuldb.com/submit/798603"
        },
        {
          "tags": [
            "exploit",
            "issue-tracking"
          ],
          "url": "https://github.com/666ghj/MiroFish/issues/488"
        },
        {
          "tags": [
            "product"
          ],
          "url": "https://github.com/666ghj/MiroFish/"
        }
      ],
      "timeline": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "time": "2026-04-26T00:00:00.000Z",
          "value": "Advisory disclosed"
        },
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "time": "2026-04-26T02:00:00.000Z",
          "value": "VulDB entry created"
        },
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "time": "2026-04-26T03:13:51.000Z",
          "value": "VulDB entry last update"
        }
      ],
      "title": "666ghj MiroFish Inter-Process Communication simulation_ipc.py SimulationIPCClient.send_command command injection"
    }
  },
  "cveMetadata": {
    "assignerOrgId": "1af790b2-7ee1-4545-860a-a788eba489b5",
    "assignerShortName": "VulDB",
    "cveId": "CVE-2026-7058",
    "datePublished": "2026-04-26T19:45:13.188Z",
    "dateReserved": "2026-04-26T01:08:34.989Z",
    "dateUpdated": "2026-04-27T13:04:10.866Z",
    "state": "PUBLISHED"
  },
  "dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
  "dataVersion": "5.2",
  "vulnerability-lookup:meta": {
    "epss": {
      "cve": "CVE-2026-7058",
      "date": "2026-06-02",
      "epss": "0.0212",
      "percentile": "0.84439"
    },
    "nvd": "{\"cve\":{\"id\":\"CVE-2026-7058\",\"sourceIdentifier\":\"cna@vuldb.com\",\"published\":\"2026-04-26T22:17:33.250\",\"lastModified\":\"2026-04-29T01:00:01.613\",\"vulnStatus\":\"Deferred\",\"cveTags\":[],\"descriptions\":[{\"lang\":\"en\",\"value\":\"A vulnerability has been found in 666ghj MiroFish up to 0.1.2. The impacted element is the function SimulationIPCClient.send_command of the file backend/app/services/simulation_ipc.py of the component Inter-Process Communication. Such manipulation leads to command injection. It is possible to launch the attack remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used. The project was informed of the problem early through an issue report but has not responded yet.\"}],\"metrics\":{\"cvssMetricV40\":[{\"source\":\"cna@vuldb.com\",\"type\":\"Secondary\",\"cvssData\":{\"version\":\"4.0\",\"vectorString\":\"CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X\",\"baseScore\":5.5,\"baseSeverity\":\"MEDIUM\",\"attackVector\":\"NETWORK\",\"attackComplexity\":\"LOW\",\"attackRequirements\":\"NONE\",\"privilegesRequired\":\"NONE\",\"userInteraction\":\"NONE\",\"vulnConfidentialityImpact\":\"LOW\",\"vulnIntegrityImpact\":\"LOW\",\"vulnAvailabilityImpact\":\"LOW\",\"subConfidentialityImpact\":\"NONE\",\"subIntegrityImpact\":\"NONE\",\"subAvailabilityImpact\":\"NONE\",\"exploitMaturity\":\"PROOF_OF_CONCEPT\",\"confidentialityRequirement\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"integrityRequirement\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"availabilityRequirement\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"modifiedAttackVector\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"modifiedAttackComplexity\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"modifiedAttackRequirements\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"modifiedPrivilegesRequired\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"modifiedUserInteraction\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"modifiedVulnConfidentialityImpact\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"modifiedVulnIntegrityImpact\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"modifiedVulnAvailabilityImpact\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"modifiedSubConfidentialityImpact\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"modifiedSubIntegrityImpact\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"modifiedSubAvailabilityImpact\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"Safety\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"Automatable\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"Recovery\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"valueDensity\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"vulnerabilityResponseEffort\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"providerUrgency\":\"NOT_DEFINED\"}}],\"cvssMetricV31\":[{\"source\":\"cna@vuldb.com\",\"type\":\"Primary\",\"cvssData\":{\"version\":\"3.1\",\"vectorString\":\"CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L\",\"baseScore\":7.3,\"baseSeverity\":\"HIGH\",\"attackVector\":\"NETWORK\",\"attackComplexity\":\"LOW\",\"privilegesRequired\":\"NONE\",\"userInteraction\":\"NONE\",\"scope\":\"UNCHANGED\",\"confidentialityImpact\":\"LOW\",\"integrityImpact\":\"LOW\",\"availabilityImpact\":\"LOW\"},\"exploitabilityScore\":3.9,\"impactScore\":3.4}],\"cvssMetricV2\":[{\"source\":\"cna@vuldb.com\",\"type\":\"Secondary\",\"cvssData\":{\"version\":\"2.0\",\"vectorString\":\"AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:P\",\"baseScore\":7.5,\"accessVector\":\"NETWORK\",\"accessComplexity\":\"LOW\",\"authentication\":\"NONE\",\"confidentialityImpact\":\"PARTIAL\",\"integrityImpact\":\"PARTIAL\",\"availabilityImpact\":\"PARTIAL\"},\"baseSeverity\":\"HIGH\",\"exploitabilityScore\":10.0,\"impactScore\":6.4,\"acInsufInfo\":false,\"obtainAllPrivilege\":false,\"obtainUserPrivilege\":false,\"obtainOtherPrivilege\":false,\"userInteractionRequired\":false}]},\"weaknesses\":[{\"source\":\"cna@vuldb.com\",\"type\":\"Primary\",\"description\":[{\"lang\":\"en\",\"value\":\"CWE-74\"},{\"lang\":\"en\",\"value\":\"CWE-77\"}]}],\"references\":[{\"url\":\"https://github.com/666ghj/MiroFish/\",\"source\":\"cna@vuldb.com\"},{\"url\":\"https://github.com/666ghj/MiroFish/issues/488\",\"source\":\"cna@vuldb.com\"},{\"url\":\"https://vuldb.com/submit/798603\",\"source\":\"cna@vuldb.com\"},{\"url\":\"https://vuldb.com/vuln/359631\",\"source\":\"cna@vuldb.com\"},{\"url\":\"https://vuldb.com/vuln/359631/cti\",\"source\":\"cna@vuldb.com\"}]}}",
    "vulnrichment": {
      "containers": "{\"cna\": {\"title\": \"666ghj MiroFish Inter-Process Communication simulation_ipc.py SimulationIPCClient.send_command command injection\", \"credits\": [{\"lang\": \"en\", \"type\": \"reporter\", \"value\": \"York Shen (VulDB User)\"}, {\"lang\": \"en\", \"type\": \"coordinator\", \"value\": \"VulDB CNA Team\"}], \"metrics\": [{\"cvssV4_0\": {\"version\": \"4.0\", \"baseScore\": 6.9, \"baseSeverity\": \"MEDIUM\", \"vectorString\": \"CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P\"}}, {\"cvssV3_1\": {\"version\": \"3.1\", \"baseScore\": 7.3, \"baseSeverity\": \"HIGH\", \"vectorString\": \"CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L/E:P/RL:X/RC:R\"}}, {\"cvssV3_0\": {\"version\": \"3.0\", \"baseScore\": 7.3, \"baseSeverity\": \"HIGH\", \"vectorString\": \"CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L/E:P/RL:X/RC:R\"}}, {\"cvssV2_0\": {\"version\": \"2.0\", \"baseScore\": 7.5, \"vectorString\": \"AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:P/E:POC/RL:ND/RC:UR\"}}], \"affected\": [{\"vendor\": \"666ghj\", \"modules\": [\"Inter-Process Communication\"], \"product\": \"MiroFish\", \"versions\": [{\"status\": \"affected\", \"version\": \"0.1.0\"}, {\"status\": \"affected\", \"version\": \"0.1.1\"}, {\"status\": \"affected\", \"version\": \"0.1.2\"}]}], \"timeline\": [{\"lang\": \"en\", \"time\": \"2026-04-26T00:00:00.000Z\", \"value\": \"Advisory disclosed\"}, {\"lang\": \"en\", \"time\": \"2026-04-26T02:00:00.000Z\", \"value\": \"VulDB entry created\"}, {\"lang\": \"en\", \"time\": \"2026-04-26T03:13:51.000Z\", \"value\": \"VulDB entry last update\"}], \"references\": [{\"url\": \"https://vuldb.com/vuln/359631\", \"name\": \"VDB-359631 | 666ghj MiroFish Inter-Process Communication simulation_ipc.py SimulationIPCClient.send_command command injection\", \"tags\": [\"vdb-entry\", \"technical-description\"]}, {\"url\": \"https://vuldb.com/vuln/359631/cti\", \"name\": \"VDB-359631 | CTI Indicators (IOB, IOC, TTP, IOA)\", \"tags\": [\"signature\", \"permissions-required\"]}, {\"url\": \"https://vuldb.com/submit/798603\", \"name\": \"Submit #798603 | 666ghj MiroFish 0.1.2 Cross-Tenant IPC Command Injection\", \"tags\": [\"third-party-advisory\"]}, {\"url\": \"https://github.com/666ghj/MiroFish/issues/488\", \"tags\": [\"exploit\", \"issue-tracking\"]}, {\"url\": \"https://github.com/666ghj/MiroFish/\", \"tags\": [\"product\"]}], \"descriptions\": [{\"lang\": \"en\", \"value\": \"A vulnerability has been found in 666ghj MiroFish up to 0.1.2. The impacted element is the function SimulationIPCClient.send_command of the file backend/app/services/simulation_ipc.py of the component Inter-Process Communication. Such manipulation leads to command injection. It is possible to launch the attack remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used. The project was informed of the problem early through an issue report but has not responded yet.\"}], \"problemTypes\": [{\"descriptions\": [{\"lang\": \"en\", \"type\": \"CWE\", \"cweId\": \"CWE-77\", \"description\": \"Command Injection\"}]}, {\"descriptions\": [{\"lang\": \"en\", \"type\": \"CWE\", \"cweId\": \"CWE-74\", \"description\": \"Injection\"}]}], \"providerMetadata\": {\"orgId\": \"1af790b2-7ee1-4545-860a-a788eba489b5\", \"shortName\": \"VulDB\", \"dateUpdated\": \"2026-04-26T19:45:13.188Z\"}}, \"adp\": [{\"title\": \"CISA ADP Vulnrichment\", \"metrics\": [{\"other\": {\"type\": \"ssvc\", \"content\": {\"id\": \"CVE-2026-7058\", \"role\": \"CISA Coordinator\", \"options\": [{\"Exploitation\": \"poc\"}, {\"Automatable\": \"yes\"}, {\"Technical Impact\": \"partial\"}], \"version\": \"2.0.3\", \"timestamp\": \"2026-04-27T13:04:03.790224Z\"}}}], \"providerMetadata\": {\"shortName\": \"CISA-ADP\", \"orgId\": \"134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0\", \"dateUpdated\": \"2026-04-27T13:04:07.312Z\"}}]}",
      "cveMetadata": "{\"cveId\": \"CVE-2026-7058\", \"state\": \"PUBLISHED\", \"dateUpdated\": \"2026-04-26T19:45:13.188Z\", \"dateReserved\": \"2026-04-26T01:08:34.989Z\", \"assignerOrgId\": \"1af790b2-7ee1-4545-860a-a788eba489b5\", \"datePublished\": \"2026-04-26T19:45:13.188Z\", \"assignerShortName\": \"VulDB\"}",
      "dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
      "dataVersion": "5.2"
    }
  }
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.

Loading…

Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.

Loading…

Loading…