CVE-2026-70376 (GCVE-0-2026-70376)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2026-08-05 06:58 – Updated: 2026-08-05 06:58
VLAI
EPSS
VEX
Title
Pluck CMS: CSRF via Spoofable Missing-Referer Bypass Leads to Stored XSS and RCE
Summary
Pluck CMS's admin panel relies solely on a Referer-header comparison (requestedByTheSameDomain() in data/inc/functions.admin.php, gating every admin.php action) for CSRF protection, with no per-request anti-CSRF token anywhere in the admin area. When a request carries no Referer/Host information, the function's elseif branch returns true, treating the request as same-origin. Because a cross-site attacker page can suppress the Referer header (e.g. via <meta name=referrer content=no-referrer>), it can force an authenticated administrator's browser to submit forged admin actions with no valid Referer, including creating pages with raw HTML (stored XSS via the rendered page) and installing PHP modules/themes (remote code execution).
Severity
9.6 (Critical)
CWE
- CWE-352 - Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF)
Assigner
References
1 reference
| URL | Tags |
|---|---|
| https://github.com/pluck-cms/pluck |
Impacted products
Credits
{
"containers": {
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"defaultStatus": "unknown",
"product": "Pluck CMS",
"programFiles": [
"admin.php",
"data/inc/functions.admin.php"
],
"vendor": "pluck-cms",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "4.7.21",
"status": "affected",
"version": "0",
"versionType": "custom"
}
]
}
],
"credits": [
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "finder",
"value": "ILHOMJON RUSTAMOV"
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "Pluck CMS\u0027s admin panel relies solely on a Referer-header comparison (requestedByTheSameDomain() in data/inc/functions.admin.php, gating every admin.php action) for CSRF protection, with no per-request anti-CSRF token anywhere in the admin area. When a request carries no Referer/Host information, the function\u0027s elseif branch returns true, treating the request as same-origin. Because a cross-site attacker page can suppress the Referer header (e.g. via \u003cmeta name=referrer content=no-referrer\u003e), it can force an authenticated administrator\u0027s browser to submit forged admin actions with no valid Referer, including creating pages with raw HTML (stored XSS via the rendered page) and installing PHP modules/themes (remote code execution)."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"value": "CRITICAL"
},
"type": "CVSS_3.1_severity"
}
},
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"baseScore": 9.6,
"baseSeverity": "CRITICAL",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"version": "3.1"
}
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-352",
"description": "CWE-352 Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF)",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-08-05T06:58:44.471Z",
"orgId": "309f9ea4-e3e9-4c6c-b79d-e8eb01244f2c",
"shortName": "TuranSec"
},
"references": [
{
"url": "https://github.com/pluck-cms/pluck"
}
],
"title": "Pluck CMS: CSRF via Spoofable Missing-Referer Bypass Leads to Stored XSS and RCE"
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "309f9ea4-e3e9-4c6c-b79d-e8eb01244f2c",
"assignerShortName": "TuranSec",
"cveId": "CVE-2026-70376",
"datePublished": "2026-08-05T06:58:44.471Z",
"dateReserved": "2026-08-04T07:13:07.993Z",
"dateUpdated": "2026-08-05T06:58:44.471Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2"
}
Loading…
Loading…
Experimental. This forecast is provided for visualization only and may change without notice. Do not use it for operational decisions.
Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date | Other |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…