CVE-2026-49857 (GCVE-0-2026-49857)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2026-08-13 14:50 – Updated: 2026-08-13 17:52
VLAI
EPSS
VEX
Title
auth-fetch-mcp has SSRF Protection Bypass via IPv4-mapped IPv6 Loopback
Summary
auth-fetch-mcp is an MCP server that lets AI assistants fetch content from authenticated web pages. Version 3.0.1 implements SSRF protection in `assertSafeUrl()` (`src/security.ts`) to block requests to private and loopback addresses. However, the `isPrivateV6()` function fails to detect IPv4-mapped IPv6 loopback addresses in their hex-normalized form. When an attacker supplies a URL such as `http://[::ffff:127.0.0.1]:PORT/`, the Node.js WHATWG URL parser silently normalizes the host to `[::ffff:7f00:1]`. Because `net.isIPv4('7f00:1')` returns `false`, the private-IP check is bypassed and the URL is passed to the browser or HTTP client, allowing the MCP tool to reach loopback services that are supposed to be blocked. The issue is exploitable under default configuration without any special environment variable. Version 3.0.1 patches the issue.
Severity
7.4 (High)
SSVC
Exploitation: none
Automatable: no
Technical Impact: partial
CISA Coordinator · CISA-ADP (v2.0.3)
Decision recorded 2026-08-13 17:50 UTC
CWE
- CWE-918 - Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF)
Assigner
References
3 references
| URL | Tags |
|---|---|
| https://github.com/ymw0407/auth-fetch-mcp/securit… | x_refsource_CONFIRM |
| https://github.com/ymw0407/auth-fetch-mcp/commit/… | x_refsource_MISC |
| https://github.com/ymw0407/auth-fetch-mcp/release… | x_refsource_MISC |
Impacted products
1 product
| Vendor | Product | Version | CPE status | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ymw0407 | auth-fetch-mcp |
Affected:
< 3.0.2
|
guessed |
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2026-49857",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "none"
},
{
"Automatable": "no"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "partial"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2026-08-13T17:50:08.906500Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-08-13T17:52:55.357Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"product": "auth-fetch-mcp",
"vendor": "ymw0407",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "\u003c 3.0.2"
}
]
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "auth-fetch-mcp is an MCP server that lets AI assistants fetch content from authenticated web pages. Version 3.0.1 implements SSRF protection in `assertSafeUrl()` (`src/security.ts`) to block requests to private and loopback addresses. However, the `isPrivateV6()` function fails to detect IPv4-mapped IPv6 loopback addresses in their hex-normalized form. When an attacker supplies a URL such as `http://[::ffff:127.0.0.1]:PORT/`, the Node.js WHATWG URL parser silently normalizes the host to `[::ffff:7f00:1]`. Because `net.isIPv4(\u00277f00:1\u0027)` returns `false`, the private-IP check is bypassed and the URL is passed to the browser or HTTP client, allowing the MCP tool to reach loopback services that are supposed to be blocked. The issue is exploitable under default configuration without any special environment variable. Version 3.0.1 patches the issue."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "NONE",
"baseScore": 7.4,
"baseSeverity": "HIGH",
"confidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
"integrityImpact": "NONE",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"scope": "CHANGED",
"userInteraction": "REQUIRED",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N",
"version": "3.1"
}
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-918",
"description": "CWE-918: Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF)",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-08-13T14:50:25.324Z",
"orgId": "a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa",
"shortName": "GitHub_M"
},
"references": [
{
"name": "https://github.com/ymw0407/auth-fetch-mcp/security/advisories/GHSA-pvrj-8cg3-j5f8",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_CONFIRM"
],
"url": "https://github.com/ymw0407/auth-fetch-mcp/security/advisories/GHSA-pvrj-8cg3-j5f8"
},
{
"name": "https://github.com/ymw0407/auth-fetch-mcp/commit/c5c523cd55b24ae1680c5bacef95d59a81ae3450",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC"
],
"url": "https://github.com/ymw0407/auth-fetch-mcp/commit/c5c523cd55b24ae1680c5bacef95d59a81ae3450"
},
{
"name": "https://github.com/ymw0407/auth-fetch-mcp/releases/tag/v3.0.1",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC"
],
"url": "https://github.com/ymw0407/auth-fetch-mcp/releases/tag/v3.0.1"
}
],
"source": {
"advisory": "GHSA-pvrj-8cg3-j5f8",
"discovery": "UNKNOWN"
},
"title": "auth-fetch-mcp has SSRF Protection Bypass via IPv4-mapped IPv6 Loopback"
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa",
"assignerShortName": "GitHub_M",
"cveId": "CVE-2026-49857",
"datePublished": "2026-08-13T14:50:25.324Z",
"dateReserved": "2026-06-01T22:03:19.640Z",
"dateUpdated": "2026-08-13T17:52:55.357Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2",
"vulnerability-lookup:meta": {
"epss": {
"cve": "CVE-2026-49857",
"date": "2026-10-23",
"epss": "0.00488",
"percentile": "0.41139"
},
"nvd": {
"cve": {
"affected": [
{
"affectedData": [
{
"product": "auth-fetch-mcp",
"vendor": "ymw0407",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "\u003c 3.0.2"
}
]
}
],
"source": "security-advisories@github.com"
}
],
"cveTags": [],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "auth-fetch-mcp is an MCP server that lets AI assistants fetch content from authenticated web pages. Version 3.0.1 implements SSRF protection in `assertSafeUrl()` (`src/security.ts`) to block requests to private and loopback addresses. However, the `isPrivateV6()` function fails to detect IPv4-mapped IPv6 loopback addresses in their hex-normalized form. When an attacker supplies a URL such as `http://[::ffff:127.0.0.1]:PORT/`, the Node.js WHATWG URL parser silently normalizes the host to `[::ffff:7f00:1]`. Because `net.isIPv4(\u00277f00:1\u0027)` returns `false`, the private-IP check is bypassed and the URL is passed to the browser or HTTP client, allowing the MCP tool to reach loopback services that are supposed to be blocked. The issue is exploitable under default configuration without any special environment variable. Version 3.0.1 patches the issue."
},
{
"lang": "es",
"value": "auth-fetch-mcp es un servidor MCP que permite a los asistentes de IA obtener contenido de p\u00e1ginas web autenticadas. La versi\u00f3n 3.0.1 implementa protecci\u00f3n SSRF en \u2019assertSafeUrl()\u2019 (\u2019src/security.ts\u2019) para bloquear solicitudes a direcciones privadas y de bucle invertido. Sin embargo, la funci\u00f3n \u2019isPrivateV6()\u2019 no detecta las direcciones de bucle invertido IPv6 mapeadas a IPv4 en su forma hex-normalizada. Cuando un atacante proporciona una URL como \u2019http://[::ffff:127.0.0.1]:PUERTO/\u2019, el analizador de URL WHATWG de Node.js normaliza silenciosamente el host a \u2019[::ffff:7f00:1]\u2019. Debido a que \u2019net.isIPv4(\u20197f00:1\u2019)\u2019 devuelve \u2019false\u2019, la verificaci\u00f3n de IP privada se omite y la URL se pasa al navegador o cliente HTTP, permitiendo que la herramienta MCP acceda a servicios de bucle invertido que se supone que deben estar bloqueados. El problema es explotable bajo la configuraci\u00f3n predeterminada sin ninguna variable de entorno especial. La versi\u00f3n 3.0.1 corrige el problema."
}
],
"id": "CVE-2026-49857",
"lastModified": "2026-10-23T18:10:00.167",
"metrics": {
"cvssMetricV31": [
{
"cvssData": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "NONE",
"baseScore": 7.4,
"baseSeverity": "HIGH",
"confidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
"integrityImpact": "NONE",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"scope": "CHANGED",
"userInteraction": "REQUIRED",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N",
"version": "3.1"
},
"exploitabilityScore": 2.8,
"impactScore": 4.0,
"source": "security-advisories@github.com",
"type": "Secondary"
}
],
"ssvcV203": [
{
"source": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"ssvcData": {
"id": "CVE-2026-49857",
"options": [
{
"exploitation": "none"
},
{
"automatable": "no"
},
{
"technicalImpact": "partial"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2026-08-13T17:50:08.906500Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
}
}
]
},
"published": "2026-08-13T15:19:41.743",
"references": [
{
"source": "security-advisories@github.com",
"url": "https://github.com/ymw0407/auth-fetch-mcp/commit/c5c523cd55b24ae1680c5bacef95d59a81ae3450"
},
{
"source": "security-advisories@github.com",
"url": "https://github.com/ymw0407/auth-fetch-mcp/releases/tag/v3.0.1"
},
{
"source": "security-advisories@github.com",
"url": "https://github.com/ymw0407/auth-fetch-mcp/security/advisories/GHSA-pvrj-8cg3-j5f8"
}
],
"sourceIdentifier": "security-advisories@github.com",
"vulnStatus": "Deferred",
"weaknesses": [
{
"description": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "CWE-918"
}
],
"source": "security-advisories@github.com",
"type": "Secondary"
}
]
}
}
}
}
Loading…
Loading…
Drag nodes to arrange them. Double-click a related vulnerability to open it, or a source to visit its link. The Physics button on the left tunes the layout and the simulation; the legend at the bottom left hides or shows nodes by kind and by sighting type.
Experimental. This forecast is provided for visualization only and may change without notice. Do not use it for operational decisions.
Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date | Other |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Vulnerability timeline
Sightings and recorded dates, grouped by day · UTC
Loading timeline…
Loading…
Loading…
The MITRE ATT&CK techniques below are AI-generated suggestions, inferred from the description of the
vulnerability by the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-classification-roberta-base
model, served locally by ML-Gateway.
They have not been verified by an analyst and are provided for guidance only.
The approach is described in our paper Mapping CVEs to MITRE ATT&CK Techniques: A Curated Gold-Set Classifier and the Limits of LLM-Assisted Label Expansion.
Browse all ATT&CK techniques and the vulnerabilities related to each.
The approach is described in our paper Mapping CVEs to MITRE ATT&CK Techniques: A Curated Gold-Set Classifier and the Limits of LLM-Assisted Label Expansion.
Browse all ATT&CK techniques and the vulnerabilities related to each.
Loading…
Related by attack behaviour
Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.