CVE-2026-44700 (GCVE-0-2026-44700)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2026-05-14 20:51 – Updated: 2026-05-15 11:22
VLAI
Title
Elixir WebRTC: Missing DTLS peer fingerprint validation in ex_webrtc client-role handshake
Summary
Elixir WebRTC is an Elixir implementation of the W3C WebRTC API. Prior to 0.15.1 and 0.16.1, missing DTLS peer certificate fingerprint validation in the DTLS client (active) role removes one side of WebRTC's mutual authentication. The bug is not independently exploitable for media interception in standard deployments, but enables a full man-in-the-middle attack when chained with insecure signalling or a peer with similar validation gaps. This vulnerability is fixed in 0.15.1 and 0.16.1.
Severity
CWE
- CWE-295 - Improper Certificate Validation
Assigner
References
5 references
| URL | Tags |
|---|---|
| https://github.com/elixir-webrtc/ex_webrtc/securi… | x_refsource_CONFIRM |
| https://github.com/elixir-webrtc/ex_webrtc/issues/249 | x_refsource_MISC |
| https://github.com/elixir-webrtc/ex_webrtc/pull/250 | x_refsource_MISC |
| https://github.com/elixir-webrtc/ex_webrtc/releas… | x_refsource_MISC |
| https://github.com/elixir-webrtc/ex_webrtc/releas… | x_refsource_MISC |
Impacted products
1 product
| Vendor | Product | Version | |
|---|---|---|---|
| elixir-webrtc | ex_webrtc |
Affected:
< 0.15.1
Affected: >= 0.16.0, < 0.16.1 |
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2026-44700",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "none"
},
{
"Automatable": "yes"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "partial"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2026-05-15T11:22:11.028845Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-05-15T11:22:24.715Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"product": "ex_webrtc",
"vendor": "elixir-webrtc",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "\u003c 0.15.1"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "\u003e= 0.16.0, \u003c 0.16.1"
}
]
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "Elixir WebRTC is an Elixir implementation of the W3C WebRTC API. Prior to 0.15.1 and 0.16.1, missing DTLS peer certificate fingerprint validation in the DTLS client (active) role removes one side of WebRTC\u0027s mutual authentication. The bug is not independently exploitable for media interception in standard deployments, but enables a full man-in-the-middle attack when chained with insecure signalling or a peer with similar validation gaps. This vulnerability is fixed in 0.15.1 and 0.16.1."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV4_0": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackRequirements": "NONE",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"baseScore": 8.7,
"baseSeverity": "HIGH",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"subAvailabilityImpact": "NONE",
"subConfidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"subIntegrityImpact": "NONE",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N",
"version": "4.0",
"vulnAvailabilityImpact": "NONE",
"vulnConfidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"vulnIntegrityImpact": "HIGH"
}
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-295",
"description": "CWE-295: Improper Certificate Validation",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-05-14T20:51:03.877Z",
"orgId": "a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa",
"shortName": "GitHub_M"
},
"references": [
{
"name": "https://github.com/elixir-webrtc/ex_webrtc/security/advisories/GHSA-qwfw-ggxw-577c",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_CONFIRM"
],
"url": "https://github.com/elixir-webrtc/ex_webrtc/security/advisories/GHSA-qwfw-ggxw-577c"
},
{
"name": "https://github.com/elixir-webrtc/ex_webrtc/issues/249",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC"
],
"url": "https://github.com/elixir-webrtc/ex_webrtc/issues/249"
},
{
"name": "https://github.com/elixir-webrtc/ex_webrtc/pull/250",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC"
],
"url": "https://github.com/elixir-webrtc/ex_webrtc/pull/250"
},
{
"name": "https://github.com/elixir-webrtc/ex_webrtc/releases/tag/v0.15.1",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC"
],
"url": "https://github.com/elixir-webrtc/ex_webrtc/releases/tag/v0.15.1"
},
{
"name": "https://github.com/elixir-webrtc/ex_webrtc/releases/tag/v0.16.1",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC"
],
"url": "https://github.com/elixir-webrtc/ex_webrtc/releases/tag/v0.16.1"
}
],
"source": {
"advisory": "GHSA-qwfw-ggxw-577c",
"discovery": "UNKNOWN"
},
"title": "Elixir WebRTC: Missing DTLS peer fingerprint validation in ex_webrtc client-role handshake"
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa",
"assignerShortName": "GitHub_M",
"cveId": "CVE-2026-44700",
"datePublished": "2026-05-14T20:51:03.877Z",
"dateReserved": "2026-05-07T17:07:09.317Z",
"dateUpdated": "2026-05-15T11:22:24.715Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2",
"vulnerability-lookup:meta": {
"epss": {
"cve": "CVE-2026-44700",
"date": "2026-05-26",
"epss": "0.00064",
"percentile": "0.19946"
},
"nvd": "{\"cve\":{\"id\":\"CVE-2026-44700\",\"sourceIdentifier\":\"security-advisories@github.com\",\"published\":\"2026-05-14T21:16:47.907\",\"lastModified\":\"2026-05-15T14:53:48.823\",\"vulnStatus\":\"Deferred\",\"cveTags\":[],\"descriptions\":[{\"lang\":\"en\",\"value\":\"Elixir WebRTC is an Elixir implementation of the W3C WebRTC API. Prior to 0.15.1 and 0.16.1, missing DTLS peer certificate fingerprint validation in the DTLS client (active) role removes one side of WebRTC\u0027s mutual authentication. The bug is not independently exploitable for media interception in standard deployments, but enables a full man-in-the-middle attack when chained with insecure signalling or a peer with similar validation gaps. This vulnerability is fixed in 0.15.1 and 0.16.1.\"}],\"metrics\":{\"cvssMetricV40\":[{\"source\":\"security-advisories@github.com\",\"type\":\"Secondary\",\"cvssData\":{\"version\":\"4.0\",\"vectorString\":\"CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X\",\"baseScore\":8.7,\"baseSeverity\":\"HIGH\",\"attackVector\":\"NETWORK\",\"attackComplexity\":\"LOW\",\"attackRequirements\":\"NONE\",\"privilegesRequired\":\"NONE\",\"userInteraction\":\"NONE\",\"vulnConfidentialityImpact\":\"NONE\",\"vulnIntegrityImpact\":\"HIGH\",\"vulnAvailabilityImpact\":\"NONE\",\"subConfidentialityImpact\":\"NONE\",\"subIntegrityImpact\":\"NONE\",\"subAvailabilityImpact\":\"NONE\",\"exploitMaturity\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"confidentialityRequirement\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"integrityRequirement\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"availabilityRequirement\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"modifiedAttackVector\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"modifiedAttackComplexity\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"modifiedAttackRequirements\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"modifiedPrivilegesRequired\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"modifiedUserInteraction\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"modifiedVulnConfidentialityImpact\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"modifiedVulnIntegrityImpact\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"modifiedVulnAvailabilityImpact\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"modifiedSubConfidentialityImpact\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"modifiedSubIntegrityImpact\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"modifiedSubAvailabilityImpact\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"Safety\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"Automatable\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"Recovery\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"valueDensity\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"vulnerabilityResponseEffort\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"providerUrgency\":\"NOT_DEFINED\"}}]},\"weaknesses\":[{\"source\":\"security-advisories@github.com\",\"type\":\"Primary\",\"description\":[{\"lang\":\"en\",\"value\":\"CWE-295\"}]}],\"references\":[{\"url\":\"https://github.com/elixir-webrtc/ex_webrtc/issues/249\",\"source\":\"security-advisories@github.com\"},{\"url\":\"https://github.com/elixir-webrtc/ex_webrtc/pull/250\",\"source\":\"security-advisories@github.com\"},{\"url\":\"https://github.com/elixir-webrtc/ex_webrtc/releases/tag/v0.15.1\",\"source\":\"security-advisories@github.com\"},{\"url\":\"https://github.com/elixir-webrtc/ex_webrtc/releases/tag/v0.16.1\",\"source\":\"security-advisories@github.com\"},{\"url\":\"https://github.com/elixir-webrtc/ex_webrtc/security/advisories/GHSA-qwfw-ggxw-577c\",\"source\":\"security-advisories@github.com\"}]}}",
"vulnrichment": {
"containers": "{\"adp\": [{\"title\": \"CISA ADP Vulnrichment\", \"metrics\": [{\"other\": {\"type\": \"ssvc\", \"content\": {\"id\": \"CVE-2026-44700\", \"role\": \"CISA Coordinator\", \"options\": [{\"Exploitation\": \"none\"}, {\"Automatable\": \"yes\"}, {\"Technical Impact\": \"partial\"}], \"version\": \"2.0.3\", \"timestamp\": \"2026-05-15T11:22:11.028845Z\"}}}], \"providerMetadata\": {\"orgId\": \"134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0\", \"shortName\": \"CISA-ADP\", \"dateUpdated\": \"2026-05-15T11:22:19.343Z\"}}], \"cna\": {\"title\": \"Elixir WebRTC: Missing DTLS peer fingerprint validation in ex_webrtc client-role handshake\", \"source\": {\"advisory\": \"GHSA-qwfw-ggxw-577c\", \"discovery\": \"UNKNOWN\"}, \"metrics\": [{\"cvssV4_0\": {\"version\": \"4.0\", \"baseScore\": 8.7, \"attackVector\": \"NETWORK\", \"baseSeverity\": \"HIGH\", \"vectorString\": \"CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N\", \"userInteraction\": \"NONE\", \"attackComplexity\": \"LOW\", \"attackRequirements\": \"NONE\", \"privilegesRequired\": \"NONE\", \"subIntegrityImpact\": \"NONE\", \"vulnIntegrityImpact\": \"HIGH\", \"subAvailabilityImpact\": \"NONE\", \"vulnAvailabilityImpact\": \"NONE\", \"subConfidentialityImpact\": \"NONE\", \"vulnConfidentialityImpact\": \"NONE\"}}], \"affected\": [{\"vendor\": \"elixir-webrtc\", \"product\": \"ex_webrtc\", \"versions\": [{\"status\": \"affected\", \"version\": \"\u003c 0.15.1\"}, {\"status\": \"affected\", \"version\": \"\u003e= 0.16.0, \u003c 0.16.1\"}]}], \"references\": [{\"url\": \"https://github.com/elixir-webrtc/ex_webrtc/security/advisories/GHSA-qwfw-ggxw-577c\", \"name\": \"https://github.com/elixir-webrtc/ex_webrtc/security/advisories/GHSA-qwfw-ggxw-577c\", \"tags\": [\"x_refsource_CONFIRM\"]}, {\"url\": \"https://github.com/elixir-webrtc/ex_webrtc/issues/249\", \"name\": \"https://github.com/elixir-webrtc/ex_webrtc/issues/249\", \"tags\": [\"x_refsource_MISC\"]}, {\"url\": \"https://github.com/elixir-webrtc/ex_webrtc/pull/250\", \"name\": \"https://github.com/elixir-webrtc/ex_webrtc/pull/250\", \"tags\": [\"x_refsource_MISC\"]}, {\"url\": \"https://github.com/elixir-webrtc/ex_webrtc/releases/tag/v0.15.1\", \"name\": \"https://github.com/elixir-webrtc/ex_webrtc/releases/tag/v0.15.1\", \"tags\": [\"x_refsource_MISC\"]}, {\"url\": \"https://github.com/elixir-webrtc/ex_webrtc/releases/tag/v0.16.1\", \"name\": \"https://github.com/elixir-webrtc/ex_webrtc/releases/tag/v0.16.1\", \"tags\": [\"x_refsource_MISC\"]}], \"descriptions\": [{\"lang\": \"en\", \"value\": \"Elixir WebRTC is an Elixir implementation of the W3C WebRTC API. Prior to 0.15.1 and 0.16.1, missing DTLS peer certificate fingerprint validation in the DTLS client (active) role removes one side of WebRTC\u0027s mutual authentication. The bug is not independently exploitable for media interception in standard deployments, but enables a full man-in-the-middle attack when chained with insecure signalling or a peer with similar validation gaps. This vulnerability is fixed in 0.15.1 and 0.16.1.\"}], \"problemTypes\": [{\"descriptions\": [{\"lang\": \"en\", \"type\": \"CWE\", \"cweId\": \"CWE-295\", \"description\": \"CWE-295: Improper Certificate Validation\"}]}], \"providerMetadata\": {\"orgId\": \"a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa\", \"shortName\": \"GitHub_M\", \"dateUpdated\": \"2026-05-14T20:51:03.877Z\"}}}",
"cveMetadata": "{\"cveId\": \"CVE-2026-44700\", \"state\": \"PUBLISHED\", \"dateUpdated\": \"2026-05-15T11:22:24.715Z\", \"dateReserved\": \"2026-05-07T17:07:09.317Z\", \"assignerOrgId\": \"a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa\", \"datePublished\": \"2026-05-14T20:51:03.877Z\", \"assignerShortName\": \"GitHub_M\"}",
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2"
}
}
}
Loading…
Loading…
Experimental. This forecast is provided for visualization only and may change without notice. Do not use it for operational decisions.
Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date | Other |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…