CVE-2026-44510 (GCVE-0-2026-44510)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2026-07-20 21:03 – Updated: 2026-07-21 15:11** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2026-43620. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2026-43620. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2026-43620 instead of this candidate.
Replaced by CVE-2026-43620
Show details on NVD website{
"containers": {
"cna": {
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-07-21T15:11:32.982Z",
"orgId": "a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa",
"shortName": "GitHub_M"
},
"rejectedReasons": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2026-43620. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2026-43620. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2026-43620 instead of this candidate."
}
],
"replacedBy": [
"CVE-2026-43620"
]
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa",
"assignerShortName": "GitHub_M",
"cveId": "CVE-2026-44510",
"datePublished": "2026-07-20T21:03:17.056Z",
"dateRejected": "2026-07-21T15:11:32.982Z",
"dateReserved": "2026-05-06T18:28:20.887Z",
"dateUpdated": "2026-07-21T15:11:32.982Z",
"state": "REJECTED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2",
"vulnerability-lookup:meta": {
"epss": {
"cve": "CVE-2026-44510",
"date": "2026-07-21",
"epss": "0.00199",
"percentile": "0.09932"
},
"microsoft_vex": {
"current_release_date": "2026-08-08T01:40:20.000Z",
"cve": "CVE-2026-44510",
"id": "msrc_CVE-2026-44510",
"initial_release_date": "2026-07-23T01:06:29.000Z",
"product_status:under_investigation": "1",
"source": "Microsoft CSAF VEX",
"status": "final",
"title": "Rejected reason: ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2026-43620. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2026-43620. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2026-43620 instead of this candidate.",
"url": "https://msrc.microsoft.com/csaf/vex/2026/msrc_cve-2026-44510.json",
"version": "2"
},
"nvd": {
"cve": {
"cveTags": [],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "Rejected reason: ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2026-43620. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2026-43620. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2026-43620 instead of this candidate."
}
],
"id": "CVE-2026-44510",
"lastModified": "2026-07-21T16:17:10.963",
"metrics": {},
"published": "2026-07-20T22:17:13.957",
"references": [],
"sourceIdentifier": "security-advisories@github.com",
"vulnStatus": "Rejected"
}
}
}
}
Drag nodes to arrange them. Double-click a related vulnerability to open it, or a source to visit its link. The Physics button on the left tunes the layout and the simulation; the legend at the bottom left hides or shows nodes by kind and by sighting type.
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date | Other |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Vulnerability timeline
Sightings and recorded dates, grouped by day · UTC
Loading timeline…
The approach is described in our paper Mapping CVEs to MITRE ATT&CK Techniques: A Curated Gold-Set Classifier and the Limits of LLM-Assisted Label Expansion.
Browse all ATT&CK techniques and the vulnerabilities related to each.
Related by attack behaviour
Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.