CVE-2026-35567 (GCVE-0-2026-35567)

Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2026-04-07 15:49 – Updated: 2026-04-09 16:51
VLAI?

** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2026-39327. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2026-39327. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2026-39327 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage.another CVE.

Replaced by CVE-2026-39327

Show details on NVD website
To clipboard 

{
  "containers": {
    "cna": {
      "providerMetadata": {
        "dateUpdated": "2026-04-09T16:51:09.351Z",
        "orgId": "a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa",
        "shortName": "GitHub_M"
      },
      "rejectedReasons": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "value": "** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2026-39327. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2026-39327. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2026-39327 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage.another CVE."
        }
      ],
      "replacedBy": [
        "CVE-2026-39327"
      ]
    }
  },
  "cveMetadata": {
    "assignerOrgId": "a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa",
    "assignerShortName": "GitHub_M",
    "cveId": "CVE-2026-35567",
    "datePublished": "2026-04-07T15:49:55.587Z",
    "dateRejected": "2026-04-08T21:07:42.669Z",
    "dateReserved": "2026-04-03T20:09:02.826Z",
    "dateUpdated": "2026-04-09T16:51:09.351Z",
    "state": "REJECTED"
  },
  "dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
  "dataVersion": "5.2",
  "vulnerability-lookup:meta": {
    "nvd": "{\"cve\":{\"id\":\"CVE-2026-35567\",\"sourceIdentifier\":\"security-advisories@github.com\",\"published\":\"2026-04-07T16:16:29.747\",\"lastModified\":\"2026-04-09T17:16:26.053\",\"vulnStatus\":\"Rejected\",\"cveTags\":[],\"descriptions\":[{\"lang\":\"en\",\"value\":\"Rejected reason: ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2026-39327. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2026-39327. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2026-39327 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage.another CVE.\"}],\"metrics\":{},\"references\":[]}}",
    "vulnrichment": {
      "containers": "{\"cna\": {\"rejectedReasons\": [{\"lang\": \"en\", \"value\": \"** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2026-39327. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2026-39327. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2026-39327 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage.another CVE.\"}], \"replacedBy\": [\"CVE-2026-39327\"], \"providerMetadata\": {\"orgId\": \"a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa\", \"shortName\": \"GitHub_M\", \"dateUpdated\": \"2026-04-09T16:51:09.351Z\"}}}",
      "cveMetadata": "{\"cveId\": \"CVE-2026-35567\", \"assignerOrgId\": \"a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa\", \"state\": \"REJECTED\", \"assignerShortName\": \"GitHub_M\", \"dateReserved\": \"2026-04-03T20:09:02.826Z\", \"datePublished\": \"2026-04-07T15:49:55.587Z\", \"dateUpdated\": \"2026-04-09T16:51:09.351Z\", \"dateRejected\": \"2026-04-08T21:07:42.669Z\"}",
      "dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
      "dataVersion": "5.2"
    }
  }
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.




Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.



Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.