CVE-2026-34500 (GCVE-0-2026-34500)

Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2026-04-09 19:36 – Updated: 2026-04-10 14:22
VLAI
Title
Apache Tomcat: OCSP checks sometimes soft-fail with FFM even when soft-fail is disabled
Summary
CLIENT_CERT authentication does not fail as expected for some scenarios when soft fail is disabled and FFM is used in Apache Tomcat. This issue affects Apache Tomcat: from 11.0.0-M14 through 11.0.20, from 10.1.22 through 10.1.53, from 9.0.92 through 9.0.116. Users are recommended to upgrade to version 11.0.21, 10.1.54 or 9.0.117, which fixes the issue.
Severity
No CVSS data available.
CWE
  • CLIENT_CERT authentication does not fail as expected for some scenarios when soft fail is disabled
Assigner
References
Impacted products
Vendor Product Version
Apache Software Foundation Apache Tomcat Affected: 11.0.0-M14 , ≤ 11.0.20 (semver)
Affected: 10.1.22 , ≤ 10.1.53 (semver)
Affected: 9.0.92 , ≤ 9.0.116 (semver)
Create a notification for this product.
Credits
Haruki Oyama (Waseda University)
Show details on NVD website

{
  "containers": {
    "adp": [
      {
        "providerMetadata": {
          "dateUpdated": "2026-04-09T23:15:55.928Z",
          "orgId": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
          "shortName": "CVE"
        },
        "references": [
          {
            "url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2026/04/09/29"
          }
        ],
        "title": "CVE Program Container"
      },
      {
        "metrics": [
          {
            "cvssV3_1": {
              "attackComplexity": "HIGH",
              "attackVector": "NETWORK",
              "availabilityImpact": "NONE",
              "baseScore": 6.5,
              "baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
              "confidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
              "integrityImpact": "LOW",
              "privilegesRequired": "NONE",
              "scope": "UNCHANGED",
              "userInteraction": "NONE",
              "vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:L/A:N",
              "version": "3.1"
            }
          },
          {
            "other": {
              "content": {
                "id": "CVE-2026-34500",
                "options": [
                  {
                    "Exploitation": "none"
                  },
                  {
                    "Automatable": "no"
                  },
                  {
                    "Technical Impact": "partial"
                  }
                ],
                "role": "CISA Coordinator",
                "timestamp": "2026-04-10T14:21:50.556349Z",
                "version": "2.0.3"
              },
              "type": "ssvc"
            }
          }
        ],
        "problemTypes": [
          {
            "descriptions": [
              {
                "cweId": "CWE-287",
                "description": "CWE-287 Improper Authentication",
                "lang": "en",
                "type": "CWE"
              }
            ]
          }
        ],
        "providerMetadata": {
          "dateUpdated": "2026-04-10T14:22:31.310Z",
          "orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
          "shortName": "CISA-ADP"
        },
        "title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
      }
    ],
    "cna": {
      "affected": [
        {
          "defaultStatus": "unaffected",
          "product": "Apache Tomcat",
          "vendor": "Apache Software Foundation",
          "versions": [
            {
              "lessThanOrEqual": "11.0.20",
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "11.0.0-M14",
              "versionType": "semver"
            },
            {
              "lessThanOrEqual": "10.1.53",
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "10.1.22",
              "versionType": "semver"
            },
            {
              "lessThanOrEqual": "9.0.116",
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "9.0.92",
              "versionType": "semver"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "credits": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "type": "finder",
          "value": "Haruki Oyama (Waseda University)"
        }
      ],
      "descriptions": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "supportingMedia": [
            {
              "base64": false,
              "type": "text/html",
              "value": "\u003cp\u003eCLIENT_CERT authentication does not fail as expected for some scenarios when soft fail is disabled and FFM is used in Apache Tomcat.\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eThis issue affects Apache Tomcat: from 11.0.0-M14 through 11.0.20, from 10.1.22 through 10.1.53, from 9.0.92 through 9.0.116.\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eUsers are recommended to upgrade to version 11.0.21, 10.1.54 or 9.0.117, which fixes the issue.\u003c/p\u003e"
            }
          ],
          "value": "CLIENT_CERT authentication does not fail as expected for some scenarios when soft fail is disabled and FFM is used in Apache Tomcat.\n\nThis issue affects Apache Tomcat: from 11.0.0-M14 through 11.0.20, from 10.1.22 through 10.1.53, from 9.0.92 through 9.0.116.\n\nUsers are recommended to upgrade to version 11.0.21, 10.1.54 or 9.0.117, which fixes the issue."
        }
      ],
      "metrics": [
        {
          "other": {
            "content": {
              "text": "moderate"
            },
            "type": "Textual description of severity"
          }
        }
      ],
      "problemTypes": [
        {
          "descriptions": [
            {
              "description": "CLIENT_CERT authentication does not fail as expected for some scenarios when soft fail is disabled",
              "lang": "en"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "providerMetadata": {
        "dateUpdated": "2026-04-09T19:36:52.857Z",
        "orgId": "f0158376-9dc2-43b6-827c-5f631a4d8d09",
        "shortName": "apache"
      },
      "references": [
        {
          "tags": [
            "vendor-advisory"
          ],
          "url": "https://lists.apache.org/thread/7rcl4zdxryc8hy3htyfyxkbqpxjtfdl2"
        }
      ],
      "source": {
        "discovery": "EXTERNAL"
      },
      "title": "Apache Tomcat: OCSP checks sometimes soft-fail with FFM even when soft-fail is disabled",
      "x_generator": {
        "engine": "Vulnogram 0.2.0"
      }
    }
  },
  "cveMetadata": {
    "assignerOrgId": "f0158376-9dc2-43b6-827c-5f631a4d8d09",
    "assignerShortName": "apache",
    "cveId": "CVE-2026-34500",
    "datePublished": "2026-04-09T19:36:52.857Z",
    "dateReserved": "2026-03-30T08:34:56.185Z",
    "dateUpdated": "2026-04-10T14:22:31.310Z",
    "state": "PUBLISHED"
  },
  "dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
  "dataVersion": "5.2",
  "vulnerability-lookup:meta": {
    "epss": {
      "cve": "CVE-2026-34500",
      "date": "2026-05-25",
      "epss": "0.00202",
      "percentile": "0.42047"
    },
    "nvd": "{\"cve\":{\"id\":\"CVE-2026-34500\",\"sourceIdentifier\":\"security@apache.org\",\"published\":\"2026-04-09T20:16:25.330\",\"lastModified\":\"2026-04-14T12:43:28.680\",\"vulnStatus\":\"Analyzed\",\"cveTags\":[],\"descriptions\":[{\"lang\":\"en\",\"value\":\"CLIENT_CERT authentication does not fail as expected for some scenarios when soft fail is disabled and FFM is used in Apache Tomcat.\\n\\nThis issue affects Apache Tomcat: from 11.0.0-M14 through 11.0.20, from 10.1.22 through 10.1.53, from 9.0.92 through 9.0.116.\\n\\nUsers are recommended to upgrade to version 11.0.21, 10.1.54 or 9.0.117, which fixes the issue.\"}],\"metrics\":{\"cvssMetricV31\":[{\"source\":\"134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0\",\"type\":\"Secondary\",\"cvssData\":{\"version\":\"3.1\",\"vectorString\":\"CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:L/A:N\",\"baseScore\":6.5,\"baseSeverity\":\"MEDIUM\",\"attackVector\":\"NETWORK\",\"attackComplexity\":\"HIGH\",\"privilegesRequired\":\"NONE\",\"userInteraction\":\"NONE\",\"scope\":\"UNCHANGED\",\"confidentialityImpact\":\"HIGH\",\"integrityImpact\":\"LOW\",\"availabilityImpact\":\"NONE\"},\"exploitabilityScore\":2.2,\"impactScore\":4.2}]},\"weaknesses\":[{\"source\":\"134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0\",\"type\":\"Secondary\",\"description\":[{\"lang\":\"en\",\"value\":\"CWE-287\"}]}],\"configurations\":[{\"nodes\":[{\"operator\":\"OR\",\"negate\":false,\"cpeMatch\":[{\"vulnerable\":true,\"criteria\":\"cpe:2.3:a:apache:tomcat:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*\",\"versionStartIncluding\":\"9.0.92\",\"versionEndExcluding\":\"9.0.117\",\"matchCriteriaId\":\"0F8E9052-1F8B-4AE4-848E-8A68AF70799D\"},{\"vulnerable\":true,\"criteria\":\"cpe:2.3:a:apache:tomcat:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*\",\"versionStartIncluding\":\"10.1.22\",\"versionEndExcluding\":\"10.1.54\",\"matchCriteriaId\":\"0F59692A-17FE-42A3-83DF-FD362A4E74C7\"},{\"vulnerable\":true,\"criteria\":\"cpe:2.3:a:apache:tomcat:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*\",\"versionStartIncluding\":\"11.0.1\",\"versionEndExcluding\":\"11.0.21\",\"matchCriteriaId\":\"C690419F-47D3-4770-8F15-7EF042E1567F\"},{\"vulnerable\":true,\"criteria\":\"cpe:2.3:a:apache:tomcat:11.0.0:milestone14:*:*:*:*:*:*\",\"matchCriteriaId\":\"72D3C6F1-84FA-4F82-96C1-9A8DA1C1F30F\"},{\"vulnerable\":true,\"criteria\":\"cpe:2.3:a:apache:tomcat:11.0.0:milestone15:*:*:*:*:*:*\",\"matchCriteriaId\":\"3521C81B-37D9-48FC-9540-D0D333B9A4A4\"},{\"vulnerable\":true,\"criteria\":\"cpe:2.3:a:apache:tomcat:11.0.0:milestone16:*:*:*:*:*:*\",\"matchCriteriaId\":\"02A84634-A8F2-4BA9-B9F3-BEF36AEC5480\"},{\"vulnerable\":true,\"criteria\":\"cpe:2.3:a:apache:tomcat:11.0.0:milestone17:*:*:*:*:*:*\",\"matchCriteriaId\":\"ECBBC1F1-C86B-40AF-B740-A99F6B27682A\"},{\"vulnerable\":true,\"criteria\":\"cpe:2.3:a:apache:tomcat:11.0.0:milestone18:*:*:*:*:*:*\",\"matchCriteriaId\":\"9D2206B2-F3FF-43F2-B3E2-3CAAC64C691D\"},{\"vulnerable\":true,\"criteria\":\"cpe:2.3:a:apache:tomcat:11.0.0:milestone19:*:*:*:*:*:*\",\"matchCriteriaId\":\"0495A538-4102-40D0-A35C-0179CFD52A9D\"},{\"vulnerable\":true,\"criteria\":\"cpe:2.3:a:apache:tomcat:11.0.0:milestone20:*:*:*:*:*:*\",\"matchCriteriaId\":\"77BA6600-0890-4BA1-B447-EC1746BAB4FD\"},{\"vulnerable\":true,\"criteria\":\"cpe:2.3:a:apache:tomcat:11.0.0:milestone21:*:*:*:*:*:*\",\"matchCriteriaId\":\"7914D26B-CBD6-4846-9BD3-403708D69319\"},{\"vulnerable\":true,\"criteria\":\"cpe:2.3:a:apache:tomcat:11.0.0:milestone22:*:*:*:*:*:*\",\"matchCriteriaId\":\"123C6285-03BE-49FC-B821-8BDB25D02863\"},{\"vulnerable\":true,\"criteria\":\"cpe:2.3:a:apache:tomcat:11.0.0:milestone23:*:*:*:*:*:*\",\"matchCriteriaId\":\"8A28C2E2-B7BC-46CE-94E4-AE3EF172AA47\"},{\"vulnerable\":true,\"criteria\":\"cpe:2.3:a:apache:tomcat:11.0.0:milestone24:*:*:*:*:*:*\",\"matchCriteriaId\":\"069B0D8E-8223-4C4E-A834-C6235D6C3450\"},{\"vulnerable\":true,\"criteria\":\"cpe:2.3:a:apache:tomcat:11.0.0:milestone25:*:*:*:*:*:*\",\"matchCriteriaId\":\"E6282085-5716-4874-B0B0-180ECDEE128F\"},{\"vulnerable\":true,\"criteria\":\"cpe:2.3:a:apache:tomcat:11.0.0:milestone26:*:*:*:*:*:*\",\"matchCriteriaId\":\"899B6FF0-8701-47E7-8EDA-428A6D48786D\"}]}]}],\"references\":[{\"url\":\"https://lists.apache.org/thread/7rcl4zdxryc8hy3htyfyxkbqpxjtfdl2\",\"source\":\"security@apache.org\",\"tags\":[\"Vendor Advisory\"]},{\"url\":\"http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2026/04/09/29\",\"source\":\"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\",\"tags\":[\"Mailing List\",\"Third Party Advisory\"]}]}}",
    "vulnrichment": {
      "containers": "{\"adp\": [{\"title\": \"CVE Program Container\", \"references\": [{\"url\": \"http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2026/04/09/29\"}], \"providerMetadata\": {\"orgId\": \"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\", \"shortName\": \"CVE\", \"dateUpdated\": \"2026-04-09T23:15:55.928Z\"}}, {\"title\": \"CISA ADP Vulnrichment\", \"metrics\": [{\"cvssV3_1\": {\"scope\": \"UNCHANGED\", \"version\": \"3.1\", \"baseScore\": 6.5, \"attackVector\": \"NETWORK\", \"baseSeverity\": \"MEDIUM\", \"vectorString\": \"CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:L/A:N\", \"integrityImpact\": \"LOW\", \"userInteraction\": \"NONE\", \"attackComplexity\": \"HIGH\", \"availabilityImpact\": \"NONE\", \"privilegesRequired\": \"NONE\", \"confidentialityImpact\": \"HIGH\"}}, {\"other\": {\"type\": \"ssvc\", \"content\": {\"id\": \"CVE-2026-34500\", \"role\": \"CISA Coordinator\", \"options\": [{\"Exploitation\": \"none\"}, {\"Automatable\": \"no\"}, {\"Technical Impact\": \"partial\"}], \"version\": \"2.0.3\", \"timestamp\": \"2026-04-10T14:21:50.556349Z\"}}}], \"problemTypes\": [{\"descriptions\": [{\"lang\": \"en\", \"type\": \"CWE\", \"cweId\": \"CWE-287\", \"description\": \"CWE-287 Improper Authentication\"}]}], \"providerMetadata\": {\"orgId\": \"134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0\", \"shortName\": \"CISA-ADP\", \"dateUpdated\": \"2026-04-10T14:20:41.381Z\"}}], \"cna\": {\"title\": \"Apache Tomcat: OCSP checks sometimes soft-fail with FFM even when soft-fail is disabled\", \"source\": {\"discovery\": \"EXTERNAL\"}, \"credits\": [{\"lang\": \"en\", \"type\": \"finder\", \"value\": \"Haruki Oyama (Waseda University)\"}], \"metrics\": [{\"other\": {\"type\": \"Textual description of severity\", \"content\": {\"text\": \"moderate\"}}}], \"affected\": [{\"vendor\": \"Apache Software Foundation\", \"product\": \"Apache Tomcat\", \"versions\": [{\"status\": \"affected\", \"version\": \"11.0.0-M14\", \"versionType\": \"semver\", \"lessThanOrEqual\": \"11.0.20\"}, {\"status\": \"affected\", \"version\": \"10.1.22\", \"versionType\": \"semver\", \"lessThanOrEqual\": \"10.1.53\"}, {\"status\": \"affected\", \"version\": \"9.0.92\", \"versionType\": \"semver\", \"lessThanOrEqual\": \"9.0.116\"}], \"defaultStatus\": \"unaffected\"}], \"references\": [{\"url\": \"https://lists.apache.org/thread/7rcl4zdxryc8hy3htyfyxkbqpxjtfdl2\", \"tags\": [\"vendor-advisory\"]}], \"x_generator\": {\"engine\": \"Vulnogram 0.2.0\"}, \"descriptions\": [{\"lang\": \"en\", \"value\": \"CLIENT_CERT authentication does not fail as expected for some scenarios when soft fail is disabled and FFM is used in Apache Tomcat.\\n\\nThis issue affects Apache Tomcat: from 11.0.0-M14 through 11.0.20, from 10.1.22 through 10.1.53, from 9.0.92 through 9.0.116.\\n\\nUsers are recommended to upgrade to version 11.0.21, 10.1.54 or 9.0.117, which fixes the issue.\", \"supportingMedia\": [{\"type\": \"text/html\", \"value\": \"\u003cp\u003eCLIENT_CERT authentication does not fail as expected for some scenarios when soft fail is disabled and FFM is used in Apache Tomcat.\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eThis issue affects Apache Tomcat: from 11.0.0-M14 through 11.0.20, from 10.1.22 through 10.1.53, from 9.0.92 through 9.0.116.\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eUsers are recommended to upgrade to version 11.0.21, 10.1.54 or 9.0.117, which fixes the issue.\u003c/p\u003e\", \"base64\": false}]}], \"problemTypes\": [{\"descriptions\": [{\"lang\": \"en\", \"description\": \"CLIENT_CERT authentication does not fail as expected for some scenarios when soft fail is disabled\"}]}], \"providerMetadata\": {\"orgId\": \"f0158376-9dc2-43b6-827c-5f631a4d8d09\", \"shortName\": \"apache\", \"dateUpdated\": \"2026-04-09T19:36:52.857Z\"}}}",
      "cveMetadata": "{\"cveId\": \"CVE-2026-34500\", \"state\": \"PUBLISHED\", \"dateUpdated\": \"2026-04-10T14:22:31.310Z\", \"dateReserved\": \"2026-03-30T08:34:56.185Z\", \"assignerOrgId\": \"f0158376-9dc2-43b6-827c-5f631a4d8d09\", \"datePublished\": \"2026-04-09T19:36:52.857Z\", \"assignerShortName\": \"apache\"}",
      "dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
      "dataVersion": "5.2"
    }
  }
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…
Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.


Loading…

Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.

Loading…

Loading…