CVE-2026-32697 (GCVE-0-2026-32697)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2026-03-19 23:13 – Updated: 2026-03-20 20:04
VLAI
EPSS
VEX
Title
SuiteCRM: RecordHandler::getRecord() missing ACLAccess('view') check allows any authenticated user to read any record (IDOR)
Summary
SuiteCRM is an open-source, enterprise-ready Customer Relationship Management (CRM) software application. Prior to versions 8.9.3, the `RecordHandler::getRecord()` method retrieves any record by module and ID without checking the current user's ACL view permission. The companion `saveRecord()` method correctly checks `$bean->ACLAccess('save')`, but `getRecord()` skips the equivalent `ACLAccess('view')` check. Version 8.9.3 patches the issue.
Severity
6.5 (Medium)
SSVC
Exploitation: none
Automatable: no
Technical Impact: partial
CISA Coordinator · CISA-ADP (v2.0.3)
Decision recorded 2026-03-20 20:04 UTC
CWE
- CWE-639 - Authorization Bypass Through User-Controlled Key
Assigner
References
1 reference
| URL | Tags |
|---|---|
| https://github.com/SuiteCRM/SuiteCRM-Core/securit… | x_refsource_CONFIRM |
Impacted products
1 product
| Vendor | Product | Version | CPE status | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SuiteCRM | SuiteCRM-Core |
Affected:
< 8.9.3
|
guessed |
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2026-32697",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "none"
},
{
"Automatable": "no"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "partial"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2026-03-20T20:04:08.531655Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-03-20T20:04:17.239Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"product": "SuiteCRM-Core",
"vendor": "SuiteCRM",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "\u003c 8.9.3"
}
]
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "SuiteCRM is an open-source, enterprise-ready Customer Relationship Management (CRM) software application. Prior to versions 8.9.3, the `RecordHandler::getRecord()` method retrieves any record by module and ID without checking the current user\u0027s ACL view permission. The companion `saveRecord()` method correctly checks `$bean-\u003eACLAccess(\u0027save\u0027)`, but `getRecord()` skips the equivalent `ACLAccess(\u0027view\u0027)` check. Version 8.9.3 patches the issue."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "NONE",
"baseScore": 6.5,
"baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
"confidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
"integrityImpact": "NONE",
"privilegesRequired": "LOW",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N",
"version": "3.1"
}
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-639",
"description": "CWE-639: Authorization Bypass Through User-Controlled Key",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-03-19T23:13:08.280Z",
"orgId": "a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa",
"shortName": "GitHub_M"
},
"references": [
{
"name": "https://github.com/SuiteCRM/SuiteCRM-Core/security/advisories/GHSA-9p9g-224x-6rmm",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_CONFIRM"
],
"url": "https://github.com/SuiteCRM/SuiteCRM-Core/security/advisories/GHSA-9p9g-224x-6rmm"
}
],
"source": {
"advisory": "GHSA-9p9g-224x-6rmm",
"discovery": "UNKNOWN"
},
"title": "SuiteCRM: RecordHandler::getRecord() missing ACLAccess(\u0027view\u0027) check allows any authenticated user to read any record (IDOR)"
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa",
"assignerShortName": "GitHub_M",
"cveId": "CVE-2026-32697",
"datePublished": "2026-03-19T23:13:08.280Z",
"dateReserved": "2026-03-13T14:33:42.822Z",
"dateUpdated": "2026-03-20T20:04:17.239Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2",
"vulnerability-lookup:meta": {
"epss": {
"cve": "CVE-2026-32697",
"date": "2026-10-15",
"epss": "0.0034",
"percentile": "0.25867"
},
"nvd": {
"cve": {
"affected": [
{
"affectedData": [
{
"product": "SuiteCRM-Core",
"vendor": "SuiteCRM",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "\u003c 8.9.3"
}
]
}
],
"source": "security-advisories@github.com"
}
],
"configurations": [
{
"nodes": [
{
"cpeMatch": [
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:a:suitecrm:suitecrm:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "CD824E64-58E0-472C-84CB-6729B4B791DF",
"versionEndExcluding": "8.9.3",
"vulnerable": true
}
],
"negate": false,
"operator": "OR"
}
]
}
],
"cveTags": [],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "SuiteCRM is an open-source, enterprise-ready Customer Relationship Management (CRM) software application. Prior to versions 8.9.3, the `RecordHandler::getRecord()` method retrieves any record by module and ID without checking the current user\u0027s ACL view permission. The companion `saveRecord()` method correctly checks `$bean-\u003eACLAccess(\u0027save\u0027)`, but `getRecord()` skips the equivalent `ACLAccess(\u0027view\u0027)` check. Version 8.9.3 patches the issue."
},
{
"lang": "es",
"value": "SuiteCRM es una aplicaci\u00f3n de software de gesti\u00f3n de relaciones con los clientes (CRM) de c\u00f3digo abierto y preparada para uso empresarial. Antes de la versi\u00f3n 8.9.3, el m\u00e9todo `RecordHandler::getRecord()` recuperaba cualquier registro por m\u00f3dulo e ID sin comprobar el permiso de visualizaci\u00f3n de la lista de controles de acceso (ACL) del usuario actual. El m\u00e9todo complementario `saveRecord()` comprueba correctamente `$bean-\u0026gt;ACLAccess(\u201csave\u201d)`, pero `getRecord()` omite la comprobaci\u00f3n equivalente `ACLAccess(\u201cview\u201d)`. La versi\u00f3n 8.9.3 corrige este problema."
}
],
"id": "CVE-2026-32697",
"lastModified": "2026-06-17T10:36:13.560",
"metrics": {
"cvssMetricV31": [
{
"cvssData": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "NONE",
"baseScore": 6.5,
"baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
"confidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
"integrityImpact": "NONE",
"privilegesRequired": "LOW",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N",
"version": "3.1"
},
"exploitabilityScore": 2.8,
"impactScore": 3.6,
"source": "security-advisories@github.com",
"type": "Secondary"
}
],
"ssvcV203": [
{
"source": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"ssvcData": {
"id": "CVE-2026-32697",
"options": [
{
"exploitation": "none"
},
{
"automatable": "no"
},
{
"technicalImpact": "partial"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2026-03-20T20:04:08.531655Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
}
}
]
},
"published": "2026-03-20T00:16:16.600",
"references": [
{
"source": "security-advisories@github.com",
"tags": [
"Vendor Advisory"
],
"url": "https://github.com/SuiteCRM/SuiteCRM-Core/security/advisories/GHSA-9p9g-224x-6rmm"
}
],
"sourceIdentifier": "security-advisories@github.com",
"vulnStatus": "Analyzed",
"weaknesses": [
{
"description": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "CWE-639"
}
],
"source": "security-advisories@github.com",
"type": "Secondary"
}
]
}
},
"redhat_vex": {
"current_release_date": "2026-03-27T07:40:33+00:00",
"cve": "CVE-2026-32697",
"id": "CVE-2026-32697",
"initial_release_date": "2026-01-01T00:00:00+00:00",
"product_status:known_not_affected": "1",
"source": "Red Hat CSAF VEX",
"status": "final",
"title": "SuiteCRM: RecordHandler::getRecord() missing ACLAccess(\u0027view\u0027) check allows any authenticated user to read any record (IDOR)",
"url": "https://security.access.redhat.com/data/csaf/v2/vex/2026/cve-2026-32697.json",
"version": "3"
},
"vulnrichment": {
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2026-32697",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "none"
},
{
"Automatable": "no"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "partial"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2026-03-20T20:04:08.531655Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-03-20T20:04:13.383Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"product": "SuiteCRM-Core",
"vendor": "SuiteCRM",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "\u003c 8.9.3"
}
]
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "SuiteCRM is an open-source, enterprise-ready Customer Relationship Management (CRM) software application. Prior to versions 8.9.3, the `RecordHandler::getRecord()` method retrieves any record by module and ID without checking the current user\u0027s ACL view permission. The companion `saveRecord()` method correctly checks `$bean-\u003eACLAccess(\u0027save\u0027)`, but `getRecord()` skips the equivalent `ACLAccess(\u0027view\u0027)` check. Version 8.9.3 patches the issue."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "NONE",
"baseScore": 6.5,
"baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
"confidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
"integrityImpact": "NONE",
"privilegesRequired": "LOW",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N",
"version": "3.1"
}
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-639",
"description": "CWE-639: Authorization Bypass Through User-Controlled Key",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-03-19T23:13:08.280Z",
"orgId": "a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa",
"shortName": "GitHub_M"
},
"references": [
{
"name": "https://github.com/SuiteCRM/SuiteCRM-Core/security/advisories/GHSA-9p9g-224x-6rmm",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_CONFIRM"
],
"url": "https://github.com/SuiteCRM/SuiteCRM-Core/security/advisories/GHSA-9p9g-224x-6rmm"
}
],
"source": {
"advisory": "GHSA-9p9g-224x-6rmm",
"discovery": "UNKNOWN"
},
"title": "SuiteCRM: RecordHandler::getRecord() missing ACLAccess(\u0027view\u0027) check allows any authenticated user to read any record (IDOR)"
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa",
"assignerShortName": "GitHub_M",
"cveId": "CVE-2026-32697",
"datePublished": "2026-03-19T23:13:08.280Z",
"dateReserved": "2026-03-13T14:33:42.822Z",
"dateUpdated": "2026-03-20T20:04:17.239Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2"
}
}
}
Loading…
Loading…
Drag nodes to arrange them. Double-click a related vulnerability to open it, or a source to visit its link. The Physics button on the left tunes the layout and the simulation; the legend at the bottom left hides or shows nodes by kind and by sighting type.
Experimental. This forecast is provided for visualization only and may change without notice. Do not use it for operational decisions.
Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date | Other |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Vulnerability timeline
Sightings and recorded dates, grouped by day · UTC
Loading timeline…
Loading…
Loading…
The MITRE ATT&CK techniques below are AI-generated suggestions, inferred from the description of the
vulnerability by the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-classification-roberta-base
model, served locally by ML-Gateway.
They have not been verified by an analyst and are provided for guidance only.
The approach is described in our paper Mapping CVEs to MITRE ATT&CK Techniques: A Curated Gold-Set Classifier and the Limits of LLM-Assisted Label Expansion.
Browse all ATT&CK techniques and the vulnerabilities related to each.
The approach is described in our paper Mapping CVEs to MITRE ATT&CK Techniques: A Curated Gold-Set Classifier and the Limits of LLM-Assisted Label Expansion.
Browse all ATT&CK techniques and the vulnerabilities related to each.
Loading…
Related by attack behaviour
Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.