CVE-2026-26287 (GCVE-0-2026-26287)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2026-10-06 15:31 – Updated: 2026-10-06 17:21
VLAI
EPSS
VEX
Title
External Secrets Operator: label enforcement bypass in webhook generator enables secret exfiltration
Summary
External Secrets Operator reads information from a third-party service and automatically injects the values as Kubernetes Secrets. Starting in version 0.10.0 and prior to version 1.3.2, a bug in the `webhook` generator initialization order incorrectly cleared the label-enforcement flag (`EnforceLabels`) after it was set, resulting in the provider-side check for `external-secrets.io/type=webhook` being skipped (and the operation to succeed while it should have failed with `secret does not contain needed label 'external-secrets.io/type: webhook'. Update secret label to use it with webhook`. Version 1.3.2 contains a patch.
Severity
7.1 (High)
SSVC
Exploitation: none
Automatable: no
Technical Impact: partial
CISA Coordinator · CISA-ADP (v2.0.3)
Decision recorded 2026-10-06 17:21 UTC
CWE
- CWE-696 - Incorrect Behavior Order
Assigner
References
4 references
| URL | Tags |
|---|---|
| https://github.com/external-secrets/external-secr… | x_refsource_CONFIRM |
| https://github.com/external-secrets/external-secr… | x_refsource_MISC |
| https://github.com/external-secrets/external-secr… | x_refsource_MISC |
| https://github.com/external-secrets/external-secr… | x_refsource_MISC |
Impacted products
1 product
| Vendor | Product | Version | CPE status | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| external-secrets | external-secrets |
Affected:
>= 0.10.0, < 1.3.2
|
guessed |
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2026-26287",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "none"
},
{
"Automatable": "no"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "partial"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2026-10-06T17:21:33.262411Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-10-06T17:21:44.292Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"product": "external-secrets",
"vendor": "external-secrets",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "\u003e= 0.10.0, \u003c 1.3.2"
}
]
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "External Secrets Operator reads information from a third-party service and automatically injects the values as Kubernetes Secrets. Starting in version 0.10.0 and prior to version 1.3.2, a bug in the `webhook` generator initialization order incorrectly cleared the label-enforcement flag (`EnforceLabels`) after it was set, resulting in the provider-side check for `external-secrets.io/type=webhook` being skipped (and the operation to succeed while it should have failed with `secret does not contain needed label \u0027external-secrets.io/type: webhook\u0027. Update secret label to use it with webhook`. Version 1.3.2 contains a patch."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "NONE",
"baseScore": 7.1,
"baseSeverity": "HIGH",
"confidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
"integrityImpact": "LOW",
"privilegesRequired": "LOW",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:L/A:N",
"version": "3.1"
}
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-696",
"description": "CWE-696: Incorrect Behavior Order",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-10-06T15:31:56.088Z",
"orgId": "a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa",
"shortName": "GitHub_M"
},
"references": [
{
"name": "https://github.com/external-secrets/external-secrets/security/advisories/GHSA-q7hv-xx6h-q2x8",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_CONFIRM"
],
"url": "https://github.com/external-secrets/external-secrets/security/advisories/GHSA-q7hv-xx6h-q2x8"
},
{
"name": "https://github.com/external-secrets/external-secrets/pull/5901",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC"
],
"url": "https://github.com/external-secrets/external-secrets/pull/5901"
},
{
"name": "https://github.com/external-secrets/external-secrets/commit/25aa09275861e3ed6fc5d2a1a60b9ac3df4a93ba",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC"
],
"url": "https://github.com/external-secrets/external-secrets/commit/25aa09275861e3ed6fc5d2a1a60b9ac3df4a93ba"
},
{
"name": "https://github.com/external-secrets/external-secrets/releases/tag/v1.3.2",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC"
],
"url": "https://github.com/external-secrets/external-secrets/releases/tag/v1.3.2"
}
],
"source": {
"advisory": "GHSA-q7hv-xx6h-q2x8",
"discovery": "UNKNOWN"
},
"title": "External Secrets Operator: label enforcement bypass in webhook generator enables secret exfiltration"
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa",
"assignerShortName": "GitHub_M",
"cveId": "CVE-2026-26287",
"datePublished": "2026-10-06T15:31:56.088Z",
"dateReserved": "2026-02-12T17:10:53.415Z",
"dateUpdated": "2026-10-06T17:21:44.292Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2",
"vulnerability-lookup:meta": {
"epss": {
"cve": "CVE-2026-26287",
"date": "2026-10-15",
"epss": "0.00244",
"percentile": "0.14544"
},
"nvd": {
"cve": {
"affected": [
{
"affectedData": [
{
"product": "external-secrets",
"vendor": "external-secrets",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "\u003e= 0.10.0, \u003c 1.3.2"
}
]
}
],
"source": "security-advisories@github.com"
}
],
"cveTags": [],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "External Secrets Operator reads information from a third-party service and automatically injects the values as Kubernetes Secrets. Starting in version 0.10.0 and prior to version 1.3.2, a bug in the `webhook` generator initialization order incorrectly cleared the label-enforcement flag (`EnforceLabels`) after it was set, resulting in the provider-side check for `external-secrets.io/type=webhook` being skipped (and the operation to succeed while it should have failed with `secret does not contain needed label \u0027external-secrets.io/type: webhook\u0027. Update secret label to use it with webhook`. Version 1.3.2 contains a patch."
}
],
"id": "CVE-2026-26287",
"lastModified": "2026-10-06T20:03:40.690",
"metrics": {
"cvssMetricV31": [
{
"cvssData": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "NONE",
"baseScore": 7.1,
"baseSeverity": "HIGH",
"confidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
"integrityImpact": "LOW",
"privilegesRequired": "LOW",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:L/A:N",
"version": "3.1"
},
"exploitabilityScore": 2.8,
"impactScore": 4.2,
"source": "security-advisories@github.com",
"type": "Secondary"
}
],
"ssvcV203": [
{
"source": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"ssvcData": {
"id": "CVE-2026-26287",
"options": [
{
"exploitation": "none"
},
{
"automatable": "no"
},
{
"technicalImpact": "partial"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2026-10-06T17:21:33.262411Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
}
}
]
},
"published": "2026-10-06T16:17:07.180",
"references": [
{
"source": "security-advisories@github.com",
"url": "https://github.com/external-secrets/external-secrets/commit/25aa09275861e3ed6fc5d2a1a60b9ac3df4a93ba"
},
{
"source": "security-advisories@github.com",
"url": "https://github.com/external-secrets/external-secrets/pull/5901"
},
{
"source": "security-advisories@github.com",
"url": "https://github.com/external-secrets/external-secrets/releases/tag/v1.3.2"
},
{
"source": "security-advisories@github.com",
"url": "https://github.com/external-secrets/external-secrets/security/advisories/GHSA-q7hv-xx6h-q2x8"
}
],
"sourceIdentifier": "security-advisories@github.com",
"vulnStatus": "Awaiting Analysis",
"weaknesses": [
{
"description": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "CWE-696"
}
],
"source": "security-advisories@github.com",
"type": "Secondary"
}
]
}
},
"redhat_vex": {
"aggregate_severity": "Important",
"current_release_date": "2026-10-07T11:08:00+00:00",
"cve": "CVE-2026-26287",
"id": "CVE-2026-26287",
"initial_release_date": "2026-10-06T15:31:56.088000+00:00",
"product_status:known_affected": "1",
"source": "Red Hat CSAF VEX",
"status": "final",
"title": "github.com/external-secrets/external-secrets: external-secrets: Sensitive information disclosure via webhook generator label enforcement bypass",
"url": "https://security.access.redhat.com/data/csaf/v2/vex/2026/cve-2026-26287.json",
"version": "3"
},
"vulnrichment": {
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2026-26287",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "none"
},
{
"Automatable": "no"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "partial"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2026-10-06T17:21:33.262411Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-10-06T17:21:39.487Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"product": "external-secrets",
"vendor": "external-secrets",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "\u003e= 0.10.0, \u003c 1.3.2"
}
]
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "External Secrets Operator reads information from a third-party service and automatically injects the values as Kubernetes Secrets. Starting in version 0.10.0 and prior to version 1.3.2, a bug in the `webhook` generator initialization order incorrectly cleared the label-enforcement flag (`EnforceLabels`) after it was set, resulting in the provider-side check for `external-secrets.io/type=webhook` being skipped (and the operation to succeed while it should have failed with `secret does not contain needed label \u0027external-secrets.io/type: webhook\u0027. Update secret label to use it with webhook`. Version 1.3.2 contains a patch."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "NONE",
"baseScore": 7.1,
"baseSeverity": "HIGH",
"confidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
"integrityImpact": "LOW",
"privilegesRequired": "LOW",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:L/A:N",
"version": "3.1"
}
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-696",
"description": "CWE-696: Incorrect Behavior Order",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-10-06T15:31:56.088Z",
"orgId": "a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa",
"shortName": "GitHub_M"
},
"references": [
{
"name": "https://github.com/external-secrets/external-secrets/security/advisories/GHSA-q7hv-xx6h-q2x8",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_CONFIRM"
],
"url": "https://github.com/external-secrets/external-secrets/security/advisories/GHSA-q7hv-xx6h-q2x8"
},
{
"name": "https://github.com/external-secrets/external-secrets/pull/5901",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC"
],
"url": "https://github.com/external-secrets/external-secrets/pull/5901"
},
{
"name": "https://github.com/external-secrets/external-secrets/commit/25aa09275861e3ed6fc5d2a1a60b9ac3df4a93ba",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC"
],
"url": "https://github.com/external-secrets/external-secrets/commit/25aa09275861e3ed6fc5d2a1a60b9ac3df4a93ba"
},
{
"name": "https://github.com/external-secrets/external-secrets/releases/tag/v1.3.2",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC"
],
"url": "https://github.com/external-secrets/external-secrets/releases/tag/v1.3.2"
}
],
"source": {
"advisory": "GHSA-q7hv-xx6h-q2x8",
"discovery": "UNKNOWN"
},
"title": "External Secrets Operator: label enforcement bypass in webhook generator enables secret exfiltration"
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa",
"assignerShortName": "GitHub_M",
"cveId": "CVE-2026-26287",
"datePublished": "2026-10-06T15:31:56.088Z",
"dateReserved": "2026-02-12T17:10:53.415Z",
"dateUpdated": "2026-10-06T17:21:44.292Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2"
}
}
}
Loading…
Loading…
Drag nodes to arrange them. Double-click a related vulnerability to open it, or a source to visit its link. The Physics button on the left tunes the layout and the simulation; the legend at the bottom left hides or shows nodes by kind and by sighting type.
Experimental. This forecast is provided for visualization only and may change without notice. Do not use it for operational decisions.
Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date | Other |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Vulnerability timeline
Sightings and recorded dates, grouped by day · UTC
Loading timeline…
Loading…
Loading…
The MITRE ATT&CK techniques below are AI-generated suggestions, inferred from the description of the
vulnerability by the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-classification-roberta-base
model, served locally by ML-Gateway.
They have not been verified by an analyst and are provided for guidance only.
The approach is described in our paper Mapping CVEs to MITRE ATT&CK Techniques: A Curated Gold-Set Classifier and the Limits of LLM-Assisted Label Expansion.
Browse all ATT&CK techniques and the vulnerabilities related to each.
The approach is described in our paper Mapping CVEs to MITRE ATT&CK Techniques: A Curated Gold-Set Classifier and the Limits of LLM-Assisted Label Expansion.
Browse all ATT&CK techniques and the vulnerabilities related to each.
Loading…
Related by attack behaviour
Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.