CVE-2026-15354 (GCVE-0-2026-15354)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2026-09-04 06:40 – Updated: 2026-10-16 18:49
VLAI
EPSS
VEX
** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2026-32566. Reason: This candidate is a reservation duplicate of CVE-2026-32566 Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2026-32566 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage.
Show details on NVD website{
"containers": {
"cna": {
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-10-16T18:49:57.076Z",
"orgId": "b15e7b5b-3da4-40ae-a43c-f7aa60e62599",
"shortName": "Wordfence"
},
"rejectedReasons": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2026-32566. Reason: This candidate is a reservation duplicate of CVE-2026-32566 Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2026-32566 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage."
}
]
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "b15e7b5b-3da4-40ae-a43c-f7aa60e62599",
"assignerShortName": "Wordfence",
"cveId": "CVE-2026-15354",
"datePublished": "2026-09-04T06:40:26.391Z",
"dateRejected": "2026-10-16T18:49:57.076Z",
"dateReserved": "2026-07-10T00:10:11.358Z",
"dateUpdated": "2026-10-16T18:49:57.076Z",
"state": "REJECTED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2",
"vulnerability-lookup:meta": {
"epss": {
"cve": "CVE-2026-15354",
"date": "2026-10-16",
"epss": "0.003",
"percentile": "0.21194"
},
"nvd": {
"cve": {
"cveTags": [],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "Rejected reason: ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2026-32566. Reason: This candidate is a reservation duplicate of CVE-2026-32566 Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2026-32566 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage."
}
],
"id": "CVE-2026-15354",
"lastModified": "2026-10-16T19:17:05.913",
"metrics": {},
"published": "2026-09-04T07:17:08.487",
"references": [],
"sourceIdentifier": "security@wordfence.com",
"vulnStatus": "Rejected"
}
},
"vulnrichment": {
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2026-15354",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "none"
},
{
"Automatable": "yes"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "total"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2026-09-04T18:36:22.174605Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-09-04T18:36:28.935Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "ACPT (Premium)",
"vendor": "Mauro Cassani",
"versions": [
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "2.0.66",
"status": "affected",
"version": "0",
"versionType": "semver"
}
]
}
],
"credits": [
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "finder",
"value": "d.v4n_s3c"
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "The ACPT (Premium) plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Privilege Escalation in all versions up to, and including, 2.0.66. This is due to missing authorization in the `submit()` function, which allows unauthenticated form submissions to control the target user ID before calling `wp_update_user()`. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to overwrite any WordPress user\u0027s email address and password, including an administrator\u0027s, and take over the account. Successful exploitation requires a public ACPT user form that permits anonymous submissions."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"baseScore": 9.8,
"baseSeverity": "CRITICAL",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"version": "3.1"
}
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-269",
"description": "CWE-269 Improper Privilege Management",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-09-04T06:40:26.391Z",
"orgId": "b15e7b5b-3da4-40ae-a43c-f7aa60e62599",
"shortName": "Wordfence"
},
"references": [
{
"url": "https://www.wordfence.com/threat-intel/vulnerabilities/id/abc138f5-0bb7-4ce3-a504-89580021bedb?source=cve"
},
{
"url": "https://acpt.io/changelog/"
}
],
"timeline": [
{
"lang": "en",
"time": "2026-09-03T18:24:44.000Z",
"value": "Disclosed"
}
],
"title": "ACPT (Premium) \u003c= 2.0.66 - Unauthenticated Privilege Escalation via \u0027acpt_form_post_id\u0027 Parameter"
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "b15e7b5b-3da4-40ae-a43c-f7aa60e62599",
"assignerShortName": "Wordfence",
"cveId": "CVE-2026-15354",
"datePublished": "2026-09-04T06:40:26.391Z",
"dateReserved": "2026-07-10T00:10:11.358Z",
"dateUpdated": "2026-09-04T18:36:32.080Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2"
}
}
}
Loading…
Loading…
Drag nodes to arrange them. Double-click a related vulnerability to open it, or a source to visit its link. The Physics button on the left tunes the layout and the simulation; the legend at the bottom left hides or shows nodes by kind and by sighting type.
Experimental. This forecast is provided for visualization only and may change without notice. Do not use it for operational decisions.
Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date | Other |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Vulnerability timeline
Sightings and recorded dates, grouped by day · UTC
Loading timeline…
Loading…
Loading…
The MITRE ATT&CK techniques below are AI-generated suggestions, inferred from the description of the
vulnerability by the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-classification-roberta-base
model, served locally by ML-Gateway.
They have not been verified by an analyst and are provided for guidance only.
The approach is described in our paper Mapping CVEs to MITRE ATT&CK Techniques: A Curated Gold-Set Classifier and the Limits of LLM-Assisted Label Expansion.
Browse all ATT&CK techniques and the vulnerabilities related to each.
The approach is described in our paper Mapping CVEs to MITRE ATT&CK Techniques: A Curated Gold-Set Classifier and the Limits of LLM-Assisted Label Expansion.
Browse all ATT&CK techniques and the vulnerabilities related to each.
Loading…
Related by attack behaviour
Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.