CVE-2025-61771 (GCVE-0-2025-61771)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2025-10-07 14:42 – Updated: 2025-10-07 17:52
VLAI
EPSS
VEX
Title
Rack's multipart parser buffers large non‑file fields entirely in memory, enabling DoS (memory exhaustion)
Summary
Rack is a modular Ruby web server interface. In versions prior to 2.2.19, 3.1.17, and 3.2.2, ``Rack::Multipart::Parser` stores non-file form fields (parts without a `filename`) entirely in memory as Ruby `String` objects. A single large text field in a multipart/form-data request (hundreds of megabytes or more) can consume equivalent process memory, potentially leading to out-of-memory (OOM) conditions and denial of service (DoS). Attackers can send large non-file fields to trigger excessive memory usage. Impact scales with request size and concurrency, potentially leading to worker crashes or severe garbage-collection overhead. All Rack applications processing multipart form submissions are affected. Versions 2.2.19, 3.1.17, and 3.2.2 enforce a reasonable size cap for non-file fields (e.g., 2 MiB). Workarounds include restricting maximum request body size at the web-server or proxy layer (e.g., Nginx `client_max_body_size`) and validating and rejecting unusually large form fields at the application level.
Severity
7.5 (High)
SSVC
Exploitation: none
Automatable: yes
Technical Impact: partial
CISA Coordinator · CISA-ADP (v2.0.3)
Decision recorded 2025-10-07 17:51 UTC
CWE
- CWE-400 - Uncontrolled Resource Consumption
Assigner
References
4 references
| URL | Tags |
|---|---|
| https://github.com/rack/rack/security/advisories/… | x_refsource_CONFIRM |
| https://github.com/rack/rack/commit/589127f4ac8b5… | x_refsource_MISC |
| https://github.com/rack/rack/commit/d869fed663b11… | x_refsource_MISC |
| https://github.com/rack/rack/commit/e08f78c656c93… | x_refsource_MISC |
Impacted products
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2025-61771",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "none"
},
{
"Automatable": "yes"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "partial"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2025-10-07T17:51:58.348077Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2025-10-07T17:52:09.399Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"product": "rack",
"vendor": "rack",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "\u003c 2.2.19"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "\u003e= 3.1, \u003c 3.1.17"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "\u003e= 3.2, \u003c 3.2.2"
}
]
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "Rack is a modular Ruby web server interface. In versions prior to 2.2.19, 3.1.17, and 3.2.2, ``Rack::Multipart::Parser` stores non-file form fields (parts without a `filename`) entirely in memory as Ruby `String` objects. A single large text field in a multipart/form-data request (hundreds of megabytes or more) can consume equivalent process memory, potentially leading to out-of-memory (OOM) conditions and denial of service (DoS). Attackers can send large non-file fields to trigger excessive memory usage. Impact scales with request size and concurrency, potentially leading to worker crashes or severe garbage-collection overhead. All Rack applications processing multipart form submissions are affected. Versions 2.2.19, 3.1.17, and 3.2.2 enforce a reasonable size cap for non-file fields (e.g., 2 MiB). Workarounds include restricting maximum request body size at the web-server or proxy layer (e.g., Nginx `client_max_body_size`) and validating and rejecting unusually large form fields at the application level."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "HIGH",
"baseScore": 7.5,
"baseSeverity": "HIGH",
"confidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"integrityImpact": "NONE",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H",
"version": "3.1"
}
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-400",
"description": "CWE-400: Uncontrolled Resource Consumption",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2025-10-07T14:42:53.366Z",
"orgId": "a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa",
"shortName": "GitHub_M"
},
"references": [
{
"name": "https://github.com/rack/rack/security/advisories/GHSA-w9pc-fmgc-vxvw",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_CONFIRM"
],
"url": "https://github.com/rack/rack/security/advisories/GHSA-w9pc-fmgc-vxvw"
},
{
"name": "https://github.com/rack/rack/commit/589127f4ac8b5cf11cf88fb0cd116ffed4d2181e",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC"
],
"url": "https://github.com/rack/rack/commit/589127f4ac8b5cf11cf88fb0cd116ffed4d2181e"
},
{
"name": "https://github.com/rack/rack/commit/d869fed663b113b95a74ad53e1b5cae6ab31f29e",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC"
],
"url": "https://github.com/rack/rack/commit/d869fed663b113b95a74ad53e1b5cae6ab31f29e"
},
{
"name": "https://github.com/rack/rack/commit/e08f78c656c9394d6737c022bde087e0f33336fd",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC"
],
"url": "https://github.com/rack/rack/commit/e08f78c656c9394d6737c022bde087e0f33336fd"
}
],
"source": {
"advisory": "GHSA-w9pc-fmgc-vxvw",
"discovery": "UNKNOWN"
},
"title": "Rack\u0027s multipart parser buffers large non\u2011file fields entirely in memory, enabling DoS (memory exhaustion)"
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa",
"assignerShortName": "GitHub_M",
"cveId": "CVE-2025-61771",
"datePublished": "2025-10-07T14:42:53.366Z",
"dateReserved": "2025-09-30T19:43:49.900Z",
"dateUpdated": "2025-10-07T17:52:09.399Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.1",
"vulnerability-lookup:meta": {
"epss": {
"cve": "CVE-2025-61771",
"date": "2026-10-25",
"epss": "0.00561",
"percentile": "0.4639"
},
"nvd": {
"cve": {
"affected": [
{
"affectedData": [
{
"product": "rack",
"vendor": "rack",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "\u003c 2.2.19"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "\u003e= 3.1, \u003c 3.1.17"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "\u003e= 3.2, \u003c 3.2.2"
}
]
}
],
"source": "security-advisories@github.com"
}
],
"configurations": [
{
"nodes": [
{
"cpeMatch": [
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:a:rack:rack:*:*:*:*:*:ruby:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "EBB6060B-A06F-4A88-8457-AD850E63E562",
"versionEndExcluding": "2.2.19",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:a:rack:rack:*:*:*:*:*:ruby:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "850EC79C-0F31-441F-9001-B7CA0CD7758F",
"versionEndExcluding": "3.1.17",
"versionStartIncluding": "3.1.0",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:a:rack:rack:*:*:*:*:*:ruby:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "9A009CC5-8010-446E-A12B-BF5314CA5BEB",
"versionEndExcluding": "3.2.2",
"versionStartIncluding": "3.2.0",
"vulnerable": true
}
],
"negate": false,
"operator": "OR"
}
]
}
],
"cveTags": [],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "Rack is a modular Ruby web server interface. In versions prior to 2.2.19, 3.1.17, and 3.2.2, ``Rack::Multipart::Parser` stores non-file form fields (parts without a `filename`) entirely in memory as Ruby `String` objects. A single large text field in a multipart/form-data request (hundreds of megabytes or more) can consume equivalent process memory, potentially leading to out-of-memory (OOM) conditions and denial of service (DoS). Attackers can send large non-file fields to trigger excessive memory usage. Impact scales with request size and concurrency, potentially leading to worker crashes or severe garbage-collection overhead. All Rack applications processing multipart form submissions are affected. Versions 2.2.19, 3.1.17, and 3.2.2 enforce a reasonable size cap for non-file fields (e.g., 2 MiB). Workarounds include restricting maximum request body size at the web-server or proxy layer (e.g., Nginx `client_max_body_size`) and validating and rejecting unusually large form fields at the application level."
},
{
"lang": "es",
"value": "Rack es una interfaz modular de servidor web Ruby. En versiones anteriores a la 2.2.19, 3.1.17 y 3.2.2, \u0027Rack::Multipart::Parser\u0027 almacena campos de formulario que no son archivos (partes sin un \u0027filename\u0027) completamente en memoria como objetos Ruby \u0027String\u0027. Un \u00fanico campo de texto grande en una solicitud multipart/form-data (cientos de megabytes o m\u00e1s) puede consumir memoria de proceso equivalente, lo que podr\u00eda llevar a condiciones de falta de memoria (OOM) y denegaci\u00f3n de servicio (DoS). Los atacantes pueden enviar campos grandes que no son archivos para desencadenar un uso excesivo de memoria. El impacto escala con el tama\u00f1o de la solicitud y la concurrencia, lo que podr\u00eda llevar a fallos de los workers o a una sobrecarga severa de la recolecci\u00f3n de basura. Todas las aplicaciones Rack que procesan env\u00edos de formularios multipart est\u00e1n afectadas. Las versiones 2.2.19, 3.1.17 y 3.2.2 imponen un l\u00edmite de tama\u00f1o razonable para los campos que no son archivos (p. ej., 2 MiB). Las soluciones incluyen restringir el tama\u00f1o m\u00e1ximo del cuerpo de la solicitud en la capa del servidor web o proxy (p. ej., Nginx \u0027client_max_body_size\u0027) y validar y rechazar campos de formulario inusualmente grandes a nivel de aplicaci\u00f3n."
}
],
"id": "CVE-2025-61771",
"lastModified": "2026-10-19T16:10:00.260",
"metrics": {
"cvssMetricV31": [
{
"cvssData": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "HIGH",
"baseScore": 7.5,
"baseSeverity": "HIGH",
"confidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"integrityImpact": "NONE",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H",
"version": "3.1"
},
"exploitabilityScore": 3.9,
"impactScore": 3.6,
"source": "security-advisories@github.com",
"type": "Secondary"
}
],
"ssvcV203": [
{
"source": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"ssvcData": {
"id": "CVE-2025-61771",
"options": [
{
"exploitation": "none"
},
{
"automatable": "yes"
},
{
"technicalImpact": "partial"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2025-10-07T17:51:58.348077Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
}
}
]
},
"published": "2025-10-07T15:16:03.123",
"references": [
{
"source": "security-advisories@github.com",
"tags": [
"Patch"
],
"url": "https://github.com/rack/rack/commit/589127f4ac8b5cf11cf88fb0cd116ffed4d2181e"
},
{
"source": "security-advisories@github.com",
"tags": [
"Patch"
],
"url": "https://github.com/rack/rack/commit/d869fed663b113b95a74ad53e1b5cae6ab31f29e"
},
{
"source": "security-advisories@github.com",
"tags": [
"Patch"
],
"url": "https://github.com/rack/rack/commit/e08f78c656c9394d6737c022bde087e0f33336fd"
},
{
"source": "security-advisories@github.com",
"tags": [
"Vendor Advisory"
],
"url": "https://github.com/rack/rack/security/advisories/GHSA-w9pc-fmgc-vxvw"
}
],
"sourceIdentifier": "security-advisories@github.com",
"vulnStatus": "Analyzed",
"weaknesses": [
{
"description": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "CWE-400"
}
],
"source": "security-advisories@github.com",
"type": "Secondary"
}
]
}
},
"redhat_vex": {
"aggregate_severity": "Important",
"current_release_date": "2026-09-25T15:22:48+00:00",
"cve": "CVE-2025-61771",
"id": "CVE-2025-61771",
"initial_release_date": "2025-10-07T14:42:53.366000+00:00",
"product_status:fixed": "120",
"product_status:known_affected": "8",
"product_status:known_not_affected": "230",
"source": "Red Hat CSAF VEX",
"status": "final",
"title": "rack: Rack\u0027s multipart parser buffers large non\u2011file fields entirely in memory, enabling DoS (memory exhaustion)",
"url": "https://security.access.redhat.com/data/csaf/v2/vex/2025/cve-2025-61771.json",
"version": "3"
},
"vulnrichment": {
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2025-61771",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "none"
},
{
"Automatable": "yes"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "partial"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2025-10-07T17:51:58.348077Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2025-10-07T17:52:01.550Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"product": "rack",
"vendor": "rack",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "\u003c 2.2.19"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "\u003e= 3.1, \u003c 3.1.17"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "\u003e= 3.2, \u003c 3.2.2"
}
]
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "Rack is a modular Ruby web server interface. In versions prior to 2.2.19, 3.1.17, and 3.2.2, ``Rack::Multipart::Parser` stores non-file form fields (parts without a `filename`) entirely in memory as Ruby `String` objects. A single large text field in a multipart/form-data request (hundreds of megabytes or more) can consume equivalent process memory, potentially leading to out-of-memory (OOM) conditions and denial of service (DoS). Attackers can send large non-file fields to trigger excessive memory usage. Impact scales with request size and concurrency, potentially leading to worker crashes or severe garbage-collection overhead. All Rack applications processing multipart form submissions are affected. Versions 2.2.19, 3.1.17, and 3.2.2 enforce a reasonable size cap for non-file fields (e.g., 2 MiB). Workarounds include restricting maximum request body size at the web-server or proxy layer (e.g., Nginx `client_max_body_size`) and validating and rejecting unusually large form fields at the application level."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "HIGH",
"baseScore": 7.5,
"baseSeverity": "HIGH",
"confidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"integrityImpact": "NONE",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H",
"version": "3.1"
}
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-400",
"description": "CWE-400: Uncontrolled Resource Consumption",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2025-10-07T14:42:53.366Z",
"orgId": "a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa",
"shortName": "GitHub_M"
},
"references": [
{
"name": "https://github.com/rack/rack/security/advisories/GHSA-w9pc-fmgc-vxvw",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_CONFIRM"
],
"url": "https://github.com/rack/rack/security/advisories/GHSA-w9pc-fmgc-vxvw"
},
{
"name": "https://github.com/rack/rack/commit/589127f4ac8b5cf11cf88fb0cd116ffed4d2181e",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC"
],
"url": "https://github.com/rack/rack/commit/589127f4ac8b5cf11cf88fb0cd116ffed4d2181e"
},
{
"name": "https://github.com/rack/rack/commit/d869fed663b113b95a74ad53e1b5cae6ab31f29e",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC"
],
"url": "https://github.com/rack/rack/commit/d869fed663b113b95a74ad53e1b5cae6ab31f29e"
},
{
"name": "https://github.com/rack/rack/commit/e08f78c656c9394d6737c022bde087e0f33336fd",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC"
],
"url": "https://github.com/rack/rack/commit/e08f78c656c9394d6737c022bde087e0f33336fd"
}
],
"source": {
"advisory": "GHSA-w9pc-fmgc-vxvw",
"discovery": "UNKNOWN"
},
"title": "Rack\u0027s multipart parser buffers large non\u2011file fields entirely in memory, enabling DoS (memory exhaustion)"
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa",
"assignerShortName": "GitHub_M",
"cveId": "CVE-2025-61771",
"datePublished": "2025-10-07T14:42:53.366Z",
"dateReserved": "2025-09-30T19:43:49.900Z",
"dateUpdated": "2025-10-07T17:52:09.399Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.1"
}
}
}
Loading…
Loading…
Drag nodes to arrange them. Double-click a related vulnerability to open it, or a source to visit its link. The Physics button on the left tunes the layout and the simulation; the legend at the bottom left hides or shows nodes by kind and by sighting type.
Experimental. This forecast is provided for visualization only and may change without notice. Do not use it for operational decisions.
Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date | Other |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Vulnerability timeline
Sightings and recorded dates, grouped by day · UTC
Loading timeline…
Loading…
Loading…
The MITRE ATT&CK techniques below are AI-generated suggestions, inferred from the description of the
vulnerability by the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-classification-roberta-base
model, served locally by ML-Gateway.
They have not been verified by an analyst and are provided for guidance only.
The approach is described in our paper Mapping CVEs to MITRE ATT&CK Techniques: A Curated Gold-Set Classifier and the Limits of LLM-Assisted Label Expansion.
Browse all ATT&CK techniques and the vulnerabilities related to each.
The approach is described in our paper Mapping CVEs to MITRE ATT&CK Techniques: A Curated Gold-Set Classifier and the Limits of LLM-Assisted Label Expansion.
Browse all ATT&CK techniques and the vulnerabilities related to each.
Loading…
Related by attack behaviour
Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.