CVE-2025-38244 (GCVE-0-2025-38244)

Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2025-07-09 10:42 – Updated: 2026-05-11 21:24
VLAI
Title
smb: client: fix potential deadlock when reconnecting channels
Summary
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: smb: client: fix potential deadlock when reconnecting channels Fix cifs_signal_cifsd_for_reconnect() to take the correct lock order and prevent the following deadlock from happening ====================================================== WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected 6.16.0-rc3-build2+ #1301 Tainted: G S W ------------------------------------------------------ cifsd/6055 is trying to acquire lock: ffff88810ad56038 (&tcp_ses->srv_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: cifs_signal_cifsd_for_reconnect+0x134/0x200 but task is already holding lock: ffff888119c64330 (&ret_buf->chan_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: cifs_signal_cifsd_for_reconnect+0xcf/0x200 which lock already depends on the new lock. the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is: -> #2 (&ret_buf->chan_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}: validate_chain+0x1cf/0x270 __lock_acquire+0x60e/0x780 lock_acquire.part.0+0xb4/0x1f0 _raw_spin_lock+0x2f/0x40 cifs_setup_session+0x81/0x4b0 cifs_get_smb_ses+0x771/0x900 cifs_mount_get_session+0x7e/0x170 cifs_mount+0x92/0x2d0 cifs_smb3_do_mount+0x161/0x460 smb3_get_tree+0x55/0x90 vfs_get_tree+0x46/0x180 do_new_mount+0x1b0/0x2e0 path_mount+0x6ee/0x740 do_mount+0x98/0xe0 __do_sys_mount+0x148/0x180 do_syscall_64+0xa4/0x260 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x76/0x7e -> #1 (&ret_buf->ses_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}: validate_chain+0x1cf/0x270 __lock_acquire+0x60e/0x780 lock_acquire.part.0+0xb4/0x1f0 _raw_spin_lock+0x2f/0x40 cifs_match_super+0x101/0x320 sget+0xab/0x270 cifs_smb3_do_mount+0x1e0/0x460 smb3_get_tree+0x55/0x90 vfs_get_tree+0x46/0x180 do_new_mount+0x1b0/0x2e0 path_mount+0x6ee/0x740 do_mount+0x98/0xe0 __do_sys_mount+0x148/0x180 do_syscall_64+0xa4/0x260 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x76/0x7e -> #0 (&tcp_ses->srv_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}: check_noncircular+0x95/0xc0 check_prev_add+0x115/0x2f0 validate_chain+0x1cf/0x270 __lock_acquire+0x60e/0x780 lock_acquire.part.0+0xb4/0x1f0 _raw_spin_lock+0x2f/0x40 cifs_signal_cifsd_for_reconnect+0x134/0x200 __cifs_reconnect+0x8f/0x500 cifs_handle_standard+0x112/0x280 cifs_demultiplex_thread+0x64d/0xbc0 kthread+0x2f7/0x310 ret_from_fork+0x2a/0x230 ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30 other info that might help us debug this: Chain exists of: &tcp_ses->srv_lock --> &ret_buf->ses_lock --> &ret_buf->chan_lock Possible unsafe locking scenario: CPU0 CPU1 ---- ---- lock(&ret_buf->chan_lock); lock(&ret_buf->ses_lock); lock(&ret_buf->chan_lock); lock(&tcp_ses->srv_lock); *** DEADLOCK *** 3 locks held by cifsd/6055: #0: ffffffff857de398 (&cifs_tcp_ses_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: cifs_signal_cifsd_for_reconnect+0x7b/0x200 #1: ffff888119c64060 (&ret_buf->ses_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: cifs_signal_cifsd_for_reconnect+0x9c/0x200 #2: ffff888119c64330 (&ret_buf->chan_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: cifs_signal_cifsd_for_reconnect+0xcf/0x200
Severity
5.5 (Medium)
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Assigner
References
Impacted products
Vendor Product Version
Linux Linux Affected: d7d7a66aacd6fd8ca57baf08a7bac5421282f6f8 , < c82c7041258d96e3286f6790ab700e4edd3cc9e3 (git)
Affected: d7d7a66aacd6fd8ca57baf08a7bac5421282f6f8 , < 7f3ead8ebc0ef65b6c89a13912b4e80218425629 (git)
Affected: d7d7a66aacd6fd8ca57baf08a7bac5421282f6f8 , < fe035dc78aa6ca8f862857d45beaf7a0e03206ca (git)
Affected: d7d7a66aacd6fd8ca57baf08a7bac5421282f6f8 , < 711741f94ac3cf9f4e3aa73aa171e76d188c0819 (git)
Create a notification for this product.
Linux Linux Affected: 6.0
Unaffected: 0 , < 6.0 (semver)
Unaffected: 6.6.96 , ≤ 6.6.* (semver)
Unaffected: 6.12.36 , ≤ 6.12.* (semver)
Unaffected: 6.15.5 , ≤ 6.15.* (semver)
Unaffected: 6.16 , ≤ * (original_commit_for_fix)
Create a notification for this product.
Show details on NVD website
To clipboard 

{
  "containers": {
    "cna": {
      "affected": [
        {
          "defaultStatus": "unaffected",
          "product": "Linux",
          "programFiles": [
            "fs/smb/client/cifsglob.h",
            "fs/smb/client/connect.c"
          ],
          "repo": "https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git",
          "vendor": "Linux",
          "versions": [
            {
              "lessThan": "c82c7041258d96e3286f6790ab700e4edd3cc9e3",
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "d7d7a66aacd6fd8ca57baf08a7bac5421282f6f8",
              "versionType": "git"
            },
            {
              "lessThan": "7f3ead8ebc0ef65b6c89a13912b4e80218425629",
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "d7d7a66aacd6fd8ca57baf08a7bac5421282f6f8",
              "versionType": "git"
            },
            {
              "lessThan": "fe035dc78aa6ca8f862857d45beaf7a0e03206ca",
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "d7d7a66aacd6fd8ca57baf08a7bac5421282f6f8",
              "versionType": "git"
            },
            {
              "lessThan": "711741f94ac3cf9f4e3aa73aa171e76d188c0819",
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "d7d7a66aacd6fd8ca57baf08a7bac5421282f6f8",
              "versionType": "git"
            }
          ]
        },
        {
          "defaultStatus": "affected",
          "product": "Linux",
          "programFiles": [
            "fs/smb/client/cifsglob.h",
            "fs/smb/client/connect.c"
          ],
          "repo": "https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git",
          "vendor": "Linux",
          "versions": [
            {
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "6.0"
            },
            {
              "lessThan": "6.0",
              "status": "unaffected",
              "version": "0",
              "versionType": "semver"
            },
            {
              "lessThanOrEqual": "6.6.*",
              "status": "unaffected",
              "version": "6.6.96",
              "versionType": "semver"
            },
            {
              "lessThanOrEqual": "6.12.*",
              "status": "unaffected",
              "version": "6.12.36",
              "versionType": "semver"
            },
            {
              "lessThanOrEqual": "6.15.*",
              "status": "unaffected",
              "version": "6.15.5",
              "versionType": "semver"
            },
            {
              "lessThanOrEqual": "*",
              "status": "unaffected",
              "version": "6.16",
              "versionType": "original_commit_for_fix"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "cpeApplicability": [
        {
          "nodes": [
            {
              "cpeMatch": [
                {
                  "criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
                  "versionEndExcluding": "6.6.96",
                  "versionStartIncluding": "6.0",
                  "vulnerable": true
                },
                {
                  "criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
                  "versionEndExcluding": "6.12.36",
                  "versionStartIncluding": "6.0",
                  "vulnerable": true
                },
                {
                  "criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
                  "versionEndExcluding": "6.15.5",
                  "versionStartIncluding": "6.0",
                  "vulnerable": true
                },
                {
                  "criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
                  "versionEndExcluding": "6.16",
                  "versionStartIncluding": "6.0",
                  "vulnerable": true
                }
              ],
              "negate": false,
              "operator": "OR"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "descriptions": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "value": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nsmb: client: fix potential deadlock when reconnecting channels\n\nFix cifs_signal_cifsd_for_reconnect() to take the correct lock order\nand prevent the following deadlock from happening\n\n======================================================\nWARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected\n6.16.0-rc3-build2+ #1301 Tainted: G S      W\n------------------------------------------------------\ncifsd/6055 is trying to acquire lock:\nffff88810ad56038 (\u0026tcp_ses-\u003esrv_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: cifs_signal_cifsd_for_reconnect+0x134/0x200\n\nbut task is already holding lock:\nffff888119c64330 (\u0026ret_buf-\u003echan_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: cifs_signal_cifsd_for_reconnect+0xcf/0x200\n\nwhich lock already depends on the new lock.\n\nthe existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is:\n\n-\u003e #2 (\u0026ret_buf-\u003echan_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}:\n       validate_chain+0x1cf/0x270\n       __lock_acquire+0x60e/0x780\n       lock_acquire.part.0+0xb4/0x1f0\n       _raw_spin_lock+0x2f/0x40\n       cifs_setup_session+0x81/0x4b0\n       cifs_get_smb_ses+0x771/0x900\n       cifs_mount_get_session+0x7e/0x170\n       cifs_mount+0x92/0x2d0\n       cifs_smb3_do_mount+0x161/0x460\n       smb3_get_tree+0x55/0x90\n       vfs_get_tree+0x46/0x180\n       do_new_mount+0x1b0/0x2e0\n       path_mount+0x6ee/0x740\n       do_mount+0x98/0xe0\n       __do_sys_mount+0x148/0x180\n       do_syscall_64+0xa4/0x260\n       entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x76/0x7e\n\n-\u003e #1 (\u0026ret_buf-\u003eses_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}:\n       validate_chain+0x1cf/0x270\n       __lock_acquire+0x60e/0x780\n       lock_acquire.part.0+0xb4/0x1f0\n       _raw_spin_lock+0x2f/0x40\n       cifs_match_super+0x101/0x320\n       sget+0xab/0x270\n       cifs_smb3_do_mount+0x1e0/0x460\n       smb3_get_tree+0x55/0x90\n       vfs_get_tree+0x46/0x180\n       do_new_mount+0x1b0/0x2e0\n       path_mount+0x6ee/0x740\n       do_mount+0x98/0xe0\n       __do_sys_mount+0x148/0x180\n       do_syscall_64+0xa4/0x260\n       entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x76/0x7e\n\n-\u003e #0 (\u0026tcp_ses-\u003esrv_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}:\n       check_noncircular+0x95/0xc0\n       check_prev_add+0x115/0x2f0\n       validate_chain+0x1cf/0x270\n       __lock_acquire+0x60e/0x780\n       lock_acquire.part.0+0xb4/0x1f0\n       _raw_spin_lock+0x2f/0x40\n       cifs_signal_cifsd_for_reconnect+0x134/0x200\n       __cifs_reconnect+0x8f/0x500\n       cifs_handle_standard+0x112/0x280\n       cifs_demultiplex_thread+0x64d/0xbc0\n       kthread+0x2f7/0x310\n       ret_from_fork+0x2a/0x230\n       ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30\n\nother info that might help us debug this:\n\nChain exists of:\n  \u0026tcp_ses-\u003esrv_lock --\u003e \u0026ret_buf-\u003eses_lock --\u003e \u0026ret_buf-\u003echan_lock\n\n Possible unsafe locking scenario:\n\n       CPU0                    CPU1\n       ----                    ----\n  lock(\u0026ret_buf-\u003echan_lock);\n                               lock(\u0026ret_buf-\u003eses_lock);\n                               lock(\u0026ret_buf-\u003echan_lock);\n  lock(\u0026tcp_ses-\u003esrv_lock);\n\n *** DEADLOCK ***\n\n3 locks held by cifsd/6055:\n #0: ffffffff857de398 (\u0026cifs_tcp_ses_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: cifs_signal_cifsd_for_reconnect+0x7b/0x200\n #1: ffff888119c64060 (\u0026ret_buf-\u003eses_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: cifs_signal_cifsd_for_reconnect+0x9c/0x200\n #2: ffff888119c64330 (\u0026ret_buf-\u003echan_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: cifs_signal_cifsd_for_reconnect+0xcf/0x200"
        }
      ],
      "providerMetadata": {
        "dateUpdated": "2026-05-11T21:24:02.518Z",
        "orgId": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
        "shortName": "Linux"
      },
      "references": [
        {
          "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/c82c7041258d96e3286f6790ab700e4edd3cc9e3"
        },
        {
          "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/7f3ead8ebc0ef65b6c89a13912b4e80218425629"
        },
        {
          "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/fe035dc78aa6ca8f862857d45beaf7a0e03206ca"
        },
        {
          "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/711741f94ac3cf9f4e3aa73aa171e76d188c0819"
        }
      ],
      "title": "smb: client: fix potential deadlock when reconnecting channels",
      "x_generator": {
        "engine": "bippy-1.2.0"
      }
    }
  },
  "cveMetadata": {
    "assignerOrgId": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
    "assignerShortName": "Linux",
    "cveId": "CVE-2025-38244",
    "datePublished": "2025-07-09T10:42:26.622Z",
    "dateReserved": "2025-04-16T04:51:23.996Z",
    "dateUpdated": "2026-05-11T21:24:02.518Z",
    "state": "PUBLISHED"
  },
  "dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
  "dataVersion": "5.2",
  "vulnerability-lookup:meta": {
    "epss": {
      "cve": "CVE-2025-38244",
      "date": "2026-06-06",
      "epss": "0.0005",
      "percentile": "0.16015"
    },
    "nvd": "{\"cve\":{\"id\":\"CVE-2025-38244\",\"sourceIdentifier\":\"416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67\",\"published\":\"2025-07-09T11:15:26.480\",\"lastModified\":\"2025-11-20T20:13:41.240\",\"vulnStatus\":\"Analyzed\",\"cveTags\":[],\"descriptions\":[{\"lang\":\"en\",\"value\":\"In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\\n\\nsmb: client: fix potential deadlock when reconnecting channels\\n\\nFix cifs_signal_cifsd_for_reconnect() to take the correct lock order\\nand prevent the following deadlock from happening\\n\\n======================================================\\nWARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected\\n6.16.0-rc3-build2+ #1301 Tainted: G S      W\\n------------------------------------------------------\\ncifsd/6055 is trying to acquire lock:\\nffff88810ad56038 (\u0026tcp_ses-\u003esrv_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: cifs_signal_cifsd_for_reconnect+0x134/0x200\\n\\nbut task is already holding lock:\\nffff888119c64330 (\u0026ret_buf-\u003echan_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: cifs_signal_cifsd_for_reconnect+0xcf/0x200\\n\\nwhich lock already depends on the new lock.\\n\\nthe existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is:\\n\\n-\u003e #2 (\u0026ret_buf-\u003echan_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}:\\n       validate_chain+0x1cf/0x270\\n       __lock_acquire+0x60e/0x780\\n       lock_acquire.part.0+0xb4/0x1f0\\n       _raw_spin_lock+0x2f/0x40\\n       cifs_setup_session+0x81/0x4b0\\n       cifs_get_smb_ses+0x771/0x900\\n       cifs_mount_get_session+0x7e/0x170\\n       cifs_mount+0x92/0x2d0\\n       cifs_smb3_do_mount+0x161/0x460\\n       smb3_get_tree+0x55/0x90\\n       vfs_get_tree+0x46/0x180\\n       do_new_mount+0x1b0/0x2e0\\n       path_mount+0x6ee/0x740\\n       do_mount+0x98/0xe0\\n       __do_sys_mount+0x148/0x180\\n       do_syscall_64+0xa4/0x260\\n       entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x76/0x7e\\n\\n-\u003e #1 (\u0026ret_buf-\u003eses_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}:\\n       validate_chain+0x1cf/0x270\\n       __lock_acquire+0x60e/0x780\\n       lock_acquire.part.0+0xb4/0x1f0\\n       _raw_spin_lock+0x2f/0x40\\n       cifs_match_super+0x101/0x320\\n       sget+0xab/0x270\\n       cifs_smb3_do_mount+0x1e0/0x460\\n       smb3_get_tree+0x55/0x90\\n       vfs_get_tree+0x46/0x180\\n       do_new_mount+0x1b0/0x2e0\\n       path_mount+0x6ee/0x740\\n       do_mount+0x98/0xe0\\n       __do_sys_mount+0x148/0x180\\n       do_syscall_64+0xa4/0x260\\n       entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x76/0x7e\\n\\n-\u003e #0 (\u0026tcp_ses-\u003esrv_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}:\\n       check_noncircular+0x95/0xc0\\n       check_prev_add+0x115/0x2f0\\n       validate_chain+0x1cf/0x270\\n       __lock_acquire+0x60e/0x780\\n       lock_acquire.part.0+0xb4/0x1f0\\n       _raw_spin_lock+0x2f/0x40\\n       cifs_signal_cifsd_for_reconnect+0x134/0x200\\n       __cifs_reconnect+0x8f/0x500\\n       cifs_handle_standard+0x112/0x280\\n       cifs_demultiplex_thread+0x64d/0xbc0\\n       kthread+0x2f7/0x310\\n       ret_from_fork+0x2a/0x230\\n       ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30\\n\\nother info that might help us debug this:\\n\\nChain exists of:\\n  \u0026tcp_ses-\u003esrv_lock --\u003e \u0026ret_buf-\u003eses_lock --\u003e \u0026ret_buf-\u003echan_lock\\n\\n Possible unsafe locking scenario:\\n\\n       CPU0                    CPU1\\n       ----                    ----\\n  lock(\u0026ret_buf-\u003echan_lock);\\n                               lock(\u0026ret_buf-\u003eses_lock);\\n                               lock(\u0026ret_buf-\u003echan_lock);\\n  lock(\u0026tcp_ses-\u003esrv_lock);\\n\\n *** DEADLOCK ***\\n\\n3 locks held by cifsd/6055:\\n #0: ffffffff857de398 (\u0026cifs_tcp_ses_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: cifs_signal_cifsd_for_reconnect+0x7b/0x200\\n #1: ffff888119c64060 (\u0026ret_buf-\u003eses_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: cifs_signal_cifsd_for_reconnect+0x9c/0x200\\n #2: ffff888119c64330 (\u0026ret_buf-\u003echan_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: cifs_signal_cifsd_for_reconnect+0xcf/0x200\"},{\"lang\":\"es\",\"value\":\"En el kernel de Linux, se ha resuelto la siguiente vulnerabilidad: smb: cliente: se corrige un posible bloqueo al reconectar canales Se corrige cifs_signal_cifsd_for_reconnect() para que adopte el orden de bloqueo correcto y evite que se produzca el siguiente bloqueo ========================================================= ADVERTENCIA: se detect\u00f3 una posible dependencia de bloqueo circular 6.16.0-rc3-build2+ #1301 Tainted: G S W ------------------------------------------------------ cifsd/6055 is trying to acquire lock: ffff88810ad56038 (\u0026amp;tcp_ses-\u0026gt;srv_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: cifs_signal_cifsd_for_reconnect+0x134/0x200 but task is already holding lock: ffff888119c64330 (\u0026amp;ret_buf-\u0026gt;chan_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: cifs_signal_cifsd_for_reconnect+0xcf/0x200 which lock already depends on the new lock. the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is: -\u0026gt; #2 (\u0026amp;ret_buf-\u0026gt;chan_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}: validate_chain+0x1cf/0x270 __lock_acquire+0x60e/0x780 lock_acquire.part.0+0xb4/0x1f0 _raw_spin_lock+0x2f/0x40 cifs_setup_session+0x81/0x4b0 cifs_get_smb_ses+0x771/0x900 cifs_mount_get_session+0x7e/0x170 cifs_mount+0x92/0x2d0 cifs_smb3_do_mount+0x161/0x460 smb3_get_tree+0x55/0x90 vfs_get_tree+0x46/0x180 do_new_mount+0x1b0/0x2e0 path_mount+0x6ee/0x740 do_mount+0x98/0xe0 __do_sys_mount+0x148/0x180 do_syscall_64+0xa4/0x260 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x76/0x7e -\u0026gt; #1 (\u0026amp;ret_buf-\u0026gt;ses_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}: validate_chain+0x1cf/0x270 __lock_acquire+0x60e/0x780 lock_acquire.part.0+0xb4/0x1f0 _raw_spin_lock+0x2f/0x40 cifs_match_super+0x101/0x320 sget+0xab/0x270 cifs_smb3_do_mount+0x1e0/0x460 smb3_get_tree+0x55/0x90 vfs_get_tree+0x46/0x180 do_new_mount+0x1b0/0x2e0 path_mount+0x6ee/0x740 do_mount+0x98/0xe0 __do_sys_mount+0x148/0x180 do_syscall_64+0xa4/0x260 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x76/0x7e -\u0026gt; #0 (\u0026amp;tcp_ses-\u0026gt;srv_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}: check_noncircular+0x95/0xc0 check_prev_add+0x115/0x2f0 validate_chain+0x1cf/0x270 __lock_acquire+0x60e/0x780 lock_acquire.part.0+0xb4/0x1f0 _raw_spin_lock+0x2f/0x40 cifs_signal_cifsd_for_reconnect+0x134/0x200 __cifs_reconnect+0x8f/0x500 cifs_handle_standard+0x112/0x280 cifs_demultiplex_thread+0x64d/0xbc0 kthread+0x2f7/0x310 ret_from_fork+0x2a/0x230 ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30 other info that might help us debug this: Chain exists of: \u0026amp;tcp_ses-\u0026gt;srv_lock --\u0026gt; \u0026amp;ret_buf-\u0026gt;ses_lock --\u0026gt; \u0026amp;ret_buf-\u0026gt;chan_lock Possible unsafe locking scenario: CPU0 CPU1 ---- ---- lock(\u0026amp;ret_buf-\u0026gt;chan_lock); lock(\u0026amp;ret_buf-\u0026gt;ses_lock); lock(\u0026amp;ret_buf-\u0026gt;chan_lock); lock(\u0026amp;tcp_ses-\u0026gt;srv_lock); *** DEADLOCK *** 3 locks held by cifsd/6055: #0: ffffffff857de398 (\u0026amp;cifs_tcp_ses_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: cifs_signal_cifsd_for_reconnect+0x7b/0x200 #1: ffff888119c64060 (\u0026amp;ret_buf-\u0026gt;ses_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: cifs_signal_cifsd_for_reconnect+0x9c/0x200 #2: ffff888119c64330 (\u0026amp;ret_buf-\u0026gt;chan_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: cifs_signal_cifsd_for_reconnect+0xcf/0x200 \"}],\"metrics\":{\"cvssMetricV31\":[{\"source\":\"nvd@nist.gov\",\"type\":\"Primary\",\"cvssData\":{\"version\":\"3.1\",\"vectorString\":\"CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H\",\"baseScore\":5.5,\"baseSeverity\":\"MEDIUM\",\"attackVector\":\"LOCAL\",\"attackComplexity\":\"LOW\",\"privilegesRequired\":\"LOW\",\"userInteraction\":\"NONE\",\"scope\":\"UNCHANGED\",\"confidentialityImpact\":\"NONE\",\"integrityImpact\":\"NONE\",\"availabilityImpact\":\"HIGH\"},\"exploitabilityScore\":1.8,\"impactScore\":3.6}]},\"weaknesses\":[{\"source\":\"nvd@nist.gov\",\"type\":\"Primary\",\"description\":[{\"lang\":\"en\",\"value\":\"CWE-667\"}]}],\"configurations\":[{\"nodes\":[{\"operator\":\"OR\",\"negate\":false,\"cpeMatch\":[{\"vulnerable\":true,\"criteria\":\"cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*\",\"versionStartIncluding\":\"6.0\",\"versionEndExcluding\":\"6.6.96\",\"matchCriteriaId\":\"FFC584E9-F7DC-40D8-8BE8-9CB5F3B41F2B\"},{\"vulnerable\":true,\"criteria\":\"cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*\",\"versionStartIncluding\":\"6.7\",\"versionEndExcluding\":\"6.12.36\",\"matchCriteriaId\":\"2BD88DEC-018F-4F40-8E29-A2CA89813EBA\"},{\"vulnerable\":true,\"criteria\":\"cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*\",\"versionStartIncluding\":\"6.13\",\"versionEndExcluding\":\"6.15.5\",\"matchCriteriaId\":\"0CC768E2-3BBC-4A6E-9C2F-ECB27A703C2D\"},{\"vulnerable\":true,\"criteria\":\"cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:6.16:rc1:*:*:*:*:*:*\",\"matchCriteriaId\":\"6D4894DB-CCFE-4602-B1BF-3960B2E19A01\"},{\"vulnerable\":true,\"criteria\":\"cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:6.16:rc2:*:*:*:*:*:*\",\"matchCriteriaId\":\"09709862-E348-4378-8632-5A7813EDDC86\"},{\"vulnerable\":true,\"criteria\":\"cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:6.16:rc3:*:*:*:*:*:*\",\"matchCriteriaId\":\"415BF58A-8197-43F5-B3D7-D1D63057A26E\"}]}]}],\"references\":[{\"url\":\"https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/711741f94ac3cf9f4e3aa73aa171e76d188c0819\",\"source\":\"416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67\",\"tags\":[\"Patch\"]},{\"url\":\"https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/7f3ead8ebc0ef65b6c89a13912b4e80218425629\",\"source\":\"416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67\",\"tags\":[\"Patch\"]},{\"url\":\"https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/c82c7041258d96e3286f6790ab700e4edd3cc9e3\",\"source\":\"416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67\",\"tags\":[\"Patch\"]},{\"url\":\"https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/fe035dc78aa6ca8f862857d45beaf7a0e03206ca\",\"source\":\"416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67\",\"tags\":[\"Patch\"]}]}}"
  }
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.





Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.


Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.