CVE-2025-30473 (GCVE-0-2025-30473)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2025-04-07 08:31 – Updated: 2026-02-26 18:28- CWE-89 - Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an SQL Command ('SQL Injection')
| Vendor | Product | Version | CPE status | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apache Software Foundation | Apache Airflow Common SQL Provider |
Affected:
0 , < 1.24.1
(semver)
|
guessed |
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2025-04-07T09:04:16.647Z",
"orgId": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"shortName": "CVE"
},
"references": [
{
"url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2025/04/04/2"
},
{
"url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2025/04/06/1"
},
{
"url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2025/04/06/2"
},
{
"url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2025/04/06/3"
}
],
"title": "CVE Program Container"
},
{
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "HIGH",
"baseScore": 8.8,
"baseSeverity": "HIGH",
"confidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
"integrityImpact": "HIGH",
"privilegesRequired": "LOW",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"version": "3.1"
}
},
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2025-30473",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "none"
},
{
"Automatable": "no"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "total"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2025-04-08T03:56:19.551055Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-02-26T18:28:53.983Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"collectionURL": "https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-common-sql/",
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"packageName": "apache-airflow-providers-common-sql",
"product": "Apache Airflow Common SQL Provider",
"vendor": "Apache Software Foundation",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "1.24.1",
"status": "affected",
"version": "0",
"versionType": "semver"
}
]
}
],
"credits": [
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "reporter",
"value": "nxczje"
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"supportingMedia": [
{
"base64": false,
"type": "text/html",
"value": "\u003cp\u003eImproper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an SQL Command (\u0027SQL Injection\u0027) vulnerability in Apache Airflow Common SQL Provider.\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003e\u003cspan style=\"background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255);\"\u003eWhen using the partition clause in SQLTableCheckOperator as parameter (which was a recommended pattern), Authenticated UI User could inject arbitrary SQL command when triggering DAG exposing partition_clause to the user.\u003cbr\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan style=\"background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255);\"\u003eThis allowed the DAG Triggering user to escalate privileges to execute those arbitrary commands which they normally would not have.\u003c/span\u003e\u003cbr\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eThis issue affects Apache Airflow Common SQL Provider: before 1.24.1.\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eUsers are recommended to upgrade to version 1.24.1, which fixes the issue.\u003c/p\u003e"
}
],
"value": "Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an SQL Command (\u0027SQL Injection\u0027) vulnerability in Apache Airflow Common SQL Provider.\n\nWhen using the partition clause in SQLTableCheckOperator as parameter (which was a recommended pattern), Authenticated UI User could inject arbitrary SQL command when triggering DAG exposing partition_clause to the user.\nThis allowed the DAG Triggering user to escalate privileges to execute those arbitrary commands which they normally would not have.\n\n\nThis issue affects Apache Airflow Common SQL Provider: before 1.24.1.\n\nUsers are recommended to upgrade to version 1.24.1, which fixes the issue."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"text": "low"
},
"type": "Textual description of severity"
}
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-89",
"description": "CWE-89 Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an SQL Command (\u0027SQL Injection\u0027)",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2025-04-07T08:31:57.220Z",
"orgId": "f0158376-9dc2-43b6-827c-5f631a4d8d09",
"shortName": "apache"
},
"references": [
{
"tags": [
"patch"
],
"url": "https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/48098"
},
{
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory"
],
"url": "https://lists.apache.org/thread/53klkv790cylqcop0350w7nfq1y6h0t2"
}
],
"source": {
"discovery": "UNKNOWN"
},
"title": "Apache Airflow Common SQL Provider: Remote Code Execution via Sql Injection",
"x_generator": {
"engine": "Vulnogram 0.2.0"
}
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "f0158376-9dc2-43b6-827c-5f631a4d8d09",
"assignerShortName": "apache",
"cveId": "CVE-2025-30473",
"datePublished": "2025-04-07T08:31:57.220Z",
"dateReserved": "2025-03-22T12:17:36.698Z",
"dateUpdated": "2026-02-26T18:28:53.983Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2",
"vulnerability-lookup:meta": {
"epss": {
"cve": "CVE-2025-30473",
"date": "2026-11-08",
"epss": "0.0096",
"percentile": "0.61766"
},
"nvd": {
"cve": {
"affected": [
{
"affectedData": [
{
"collectionURL": "https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-common-sql/",
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"packageName": "apache-airflow-providers-common-sql",
"product": "Apache Airflow Common SQL Provider",
"vendor": "Apache Software Foundation",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "1.24.1",
"status": "affected",
"version": "0",
"versionType": "semver"
}
]
}
],
"source": "security@apache.org"
}
],
"configurations": [
{
"nodes": [
{
"cpeMatch": [
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:a:apache:airflow_common_sql_provider:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "E1C538E3-3A53-4DE7-9ABD-F7293C046752",
"versionEndExcluding": "1.24.1",
"vulnerable": true
}
],
"negate": false,
"operator": "OR"
}
]
}
],
"cveTags": [],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an SQL Command (\u0027SQL Injection\u0027) vulnerability in Apache Airflow Common SQL Provider.\n\nWhen using the partition clause in SQLTableCheckOperator as parameter (which was a recommended pattern), Authenticated UI User could inject arbitrary SQL command when triggering DAG exposing partition_clause to the user.\nThis allowed the DAG Triggering user to escalate privileges to execute those arbitrary commands which they normally would not have.\n\n\nThis issue affects Apache Airflow Common SQL Provider: before 1.24.1.\n\nUsers are recommended to upgrade to version 1.24.1, which fixes the issue."
},
{
"lang": "es",
"value": "Vulnerabilidad de neutralizaci\u00f3n incorrecta de elementos especiales utilizados en una vulnerabilidad de comando SQL (\u0027Inyecci\u00f3n SQL\u0027) en el proveedor SQL com\u00fan de Apache Airflow. Al usar la cl\u00e1usula de partici\u00f3n en SQLTableCheckOperator como par\u00e1metro (un patr\u00f3n recomendado), el usuario autenticado de la interfaz de usuario pod\u00eda inyectar un comando SQL arbitrario al activar el DAG, exponiendo la cl\u00e1usula de partici\u00f3n al usuario. Esto permit\u00eda al usuario que activaba el DAG escalar privilegios para ejecutar dichos comandos arbitrarios, algo que normalmente no tendr\u00eda. Este problema afecta al proveedor SQL com\u00fan de Apache Airflow: versiones anteriores a la 1.24.1. Se recomienda actualizar a la versi\u00f3n 1.24.1, que soluciona el problema."
}
],
"id": "CVE-2025-30473",
"lastModified": "2026-06-17T09:08:49.000",
"metrics": {
"cvssMetricV31": [
{
"cvssData": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "HIGH",
"baseScore": 8.8,
"baseSeverity": "HIGH",
"confidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
"integrityImpact": "HIGH",
"privilegesRequired": "LOW",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"version": "3.1"
},
"exploitabilityScore": 2.8,
"impactScore": 5.9,
"source": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"type": "Secondary"
}
],
"ssvcV203": [
{
"source": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"ssvcData": {
"id": "CVE-2025-30473",
"options": [
{
"exploitation": "none"
},
{
"automatable": "no"
},
{
"technicalImpact": "total"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2025-04-08T03:56:19.551055Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
}
}
]
},
"published": "2025-04-07T09:15:16.667",
"references": [
{
"source": "security@apache.org",
"tags": [
"Issue Tracking",
"Patch"
],
"url": "https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/48098"
},
{
"source": "security@apache.org",
"tags": [
"Mailing List",
"Vendor Advisory"
],
"url": "https://lists.apache.org/thread/53klkv790cylqcop0350w7nfq1y6h0t2"
},
{
"source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"tags": [
"Mailing List",
"Third Party Advisory"
],
"url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2025/04/04/2"
},
{
"source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"tags": [
"Mailing List"
],
"url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2025/04/06/1"
},
{
"source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"tags": [
"Mailing List"
],
"url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2025/04/06/2"
},
{
"source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"tags": [
"Mailing List"
],
"url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2025/04/06/3"
}
],
"sourceIdentifier": "security@apache.org",
"vulnStatus": "Analyzed",
"weaknesses": [
{
"description": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "CWE-89"
}
],
"source": "security@apache.org",
"type": "Secondary"
}
]
}
},
"redhat_vex": {
"current_release_date": "2026-03-27T08:46:03+00:00",
"cve": "CVE-2025-30473",
"id": "CVE-2025-30473",
"initial_release_date": "2025-01-01T00:00:00+00:00",
"product_status:known_not_affected": "1",
"source": "Red Hat CSAF VEX",
"status": "final",
"title": "Apache Airflow Common SQL Provider: Remote Code Execution via Sql Injection",
"url": "https://security.access.redhat.com/data/csaf/v2/vex/2025/cve-2025-30473.json",
"version": "3"
},
"vulnrichment": {
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2025-04-07T09:04:16.647Z",
"orgId": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"shortName": "CVE"
},
"references": [
{
"url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2025/04/04/2"
},
{
"url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2025/04/06/1"
},
{
"url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2025/04/06/2"
},
{
"url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2025/04/06/3"
}
],
"title": "CVE Program Container"
},
{
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "HIGH",
"baseScore": 8.8,
"baseSeverity": "HIGH",
"confidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
"integrityImpact": "HIGH",
"privilegesRequired": "LOW",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"version": "3.1"
}
},
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2025-30473",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "none"
},
{
"Automatable": "no"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "total"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2025-04-08T03:56:19.551055Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2025-04-07T15:15:34.926Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"collectionURL": "https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-common-sql/",
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"packageName": "apache-airflow-providers-common-sql",
"product": "Apache Airflow Common SQL Provider",
"vendor": "Apache Software Foundation",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "1.24.1",
"status": "affected",
"version": "0",
"versionType": "semver"
}
]
}
],
"credits": [
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "reporter",
"value": "nxczje"
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"supportingMedia": [
{
"base64": false,
"type": "text/html",
"value": "\u003cp\u003eImproper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an SQL Command (\u0027SQL Injection\u0027) vulnerability in Apache Airflow Common SQL Provider.\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003e\u003cspan style=\"background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255);\"\u003eWhen using the partition clause in SQLTableCheckOperator as parameter (which was a recommended pattern), Authenticated UI User could inject arbitrary SQL command when triggering DAG exposing partition_clause to the user.\u003cbr\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan style=\"background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255);\"\u003eThis allowed the DAG Triggering user to escalate privileges to execute those arbitrary commands which they normally would not have.\u003c/span\u003e\u003cbr\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eThis issue affects Apache Airflow Common SQL Provider: before 1.24.1.\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eUsers are recommended to upgrade to version 1.24.1, which fixes the issue.\u003c/p\u003e"
}
],
"value": "Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an SQL Command (\u0027SQL Injection\u0027) vulnerability in Apache Airflow Common SQL Provider.\n\nWhen using the partition clause in SQLTableCheckOperator as parameter (which was a recommended pattern), Authenticated UI User could inject arbitrary SQL command when triggering DAG exposing partition_clause to the user.\nThis allowed the DAG Triggering user to escalate privileges to execute those arbitrary commands which they normally would not have.\n\n\nThis issue affects Apache Airflow Common SQL Provider: before 1.24.1.\n\nUsers are recommended to upgrade to version 1.24.1, which fixes the issue."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"text": "low"
},
"type": "Textual description of severity"
}
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-89",
"description": "CWE-89 Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an SQL Command (\u0027SQL Injection\u0027)",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2025-04-07T08:31:57.220Z",
"orgId": "f0158376-9dc2-43b6-827c-5f631a4d8d09",
"shortName": "apache"
},
"references": [
{
"tags": [
"patch"
],
"url": "https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/48098"
},
{
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory"
],
"url": "https://lists.apache.org/thread/53klkv790cylqcop0350w7nfq1y6h0t2"
}
],
"source": {
"discovery": "UNKNOWN"
},
"title": "Apache Airflow Common SQL Provider: Remote Code Execution via Sql Injection",
"x_generator": {
"engine": "Vulnogram 0.2.0"
}
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "f0158376-9dc2-43b6-827c-5f631a4d8d09",
"assignerShortName": "apache",
"cveId": "CVE-2025-30473",
"datePublished": "2025-04-07T08:31:57.220Z",
"dateReserved": "2025-03-22T12:17:36.698Z",
"dateUpdated": "2026-02-26T18:28:53.983Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2"
}
}
}
Drag nodes to arrange them. Double-click a related vulnerability to open it, or a source to visit its link. The Physics button on the left tunes the layout and the simulation; the legend at the bottom left hides or shows nodes by kind and by sighting type.
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date | Other |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Vulnerability timeline
Sightings and recorded dates, grouped by day · UTC
How durations are calculated
Following the VTEM framework (Black Hat USA 2015), time to patch starts when the vendor or a coordinator was informed, total time to patch at discovery, and disclosure to patch at public disclosure; vendor response time runs from the report to its acknowledgement. Time to exploit and time unpatched start at the earliest discovery or report, falling back to public disclosure. Unpatched time ends at the first recorded patch, or the calculation time when no patch is recorded. Exploitation to patch shows the interval between those two events; a published proof of concept is a public exploit, not exploitation.
Each result shows its source dates. A negative interval means the end event came first; when date-only inputs leave the order open, the result says so. Date-only inputs are approximate. The earliest evidence wins: KEV report dates and sightings are labelled as such. Records describing another vulnerability are listed but never calculated from, and a PoC alone does not establish exploitation. Missing patch evidence does not prove that no patch exists. Filters below change the event list only.
Loading timeline…
The approach is described in our paper Mapping CVEs to MITRE ATT&CK Techniques: A Curated Gold-Set Classifier and the Limits of LLM-Assisted Label Expansion.
Browse all ATT&CK techniques and the vulnerabilities related to each.
Related by attack behaviour
Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.