CVE-2025-1713 (GCVE-0-2025-1713)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2025-07-17 13:59 – Updated: 2025-07-17 14:21
VLAI
EPSS
VEX
Title
deadlock potential with VT-d and legacy PCI device pass-through
Summary
When setting up interrupt remapping for legacy PCI(-X) devices,
including PCI(-X) bridges, a lookup of the upstream bridge is required.
This lookup, itself involving acquiring of a lock, is done in a context
where acquiring that lock is unsafe. This can lead to a deadlock.
Severity
7.5 (High)
SSVC
Exploitation: none
Automatable: yes
Technical Impact: partial
CISA Coordinator · CISA-ADP (v2.0.3)
Decision recorded 2025-07-17 14:17 UTC
CWE
- CWE-833 - Deadlock
Assigner
References
Impacted products
Date Public
2025-02-27 12:52
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2025-07-17T14:04:25.770Z",
"orgId": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"shortName": "CVE"
},
"references": [
{
"url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2025/02/27/1"
},
{
"url": "http://xenbits.xen.org/xsa/advisory-467.html"
},
{
"url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2025/02/27/3"
},
{
"url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2025/02/28/1"
}
],
"title": "CVE Program Container"
},
{
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "HIGH",
"baseScore": 7.5,
"baseSeverity": "HIGH",
"confidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"integrityImpact": "NONE",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H",
"version": "3.1"
}
},
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2025-1713",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "none"
},
{
"Automatable": "yes"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "partial"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2025-07-17T14:17:20.052947Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-833",
"description": "CWE-833 Deadlock",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2025-07-17T14:21:42.020Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"defaultStatus": "unknown",
"product": "Xen",
"vendor": "Xen",
"versions": [
{
"status": "unknown",
"version": "consult Xen advisory XSA-467"
}
]
}
],
"configurations": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "Xen versions 4.0 and later are affected. Xen versions 3.4 and earlier\nare not directly affected, but had other issues.\n\nSystems with Intel IOMMU hardware (VT-d) are affected. Systems using\nAMD or non-x86 hardware are not affected.\n\nOnly systems where certain kinds of devices are passed through to an\nunprivileged guest are vulnerable."
}
],
"datePublic": "2025-02-27T12:52:00.000Z",
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "When setting up interrupt remapping for legacy PCI(-X) devices,\nincluding PCI(-X) bridges, a lookup of the upstream bridge is required.\nThis lookup, itself involving acquiring of a lock, is done in a context\nwhere acquiring that lock is unsafe. This can lead to a deadlock."
}
],
"impacts": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "The passing through of certain kinds of devices to an unprivileged guest\ncan result in a Denial of Service (DoS) affecting the entire host.\n\nNote: Normal usage of such devices by a privileged domain can also\n trigger the issue. In such a scenario, the deadlock is not\n considered a security issue, but just a plain bug."
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2025-07-17T13:59:46.231Z",
"orgId": "23aa2041-22e1-471f-9209-9b7396fa234f",
"shortName": "XEN"
},
"references": [
{
"url": "https://xenbits.xenproject.org/xsa/advisory-467.html"
}
],
"title": "deadlock potential with VT-d and legacy PCI device pass-through",
"workarounds": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "Avoiding the passing through of the affected device types will avoid\nthe vulnerability."
}
]
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "23aa2041-22e1-471f-9209-9b7396fa234f",
"assignerShortName": "XEN",
"cveId": "CVE-2025-1713",
"datePublished": "2025-07-17T13:59:46.231Z",
"dateReserved": "2025-02-26T09:04:42.837Z",
"dateUpdated": "2025-07-17T14:21:42.020Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.1",
"vulnerability-lookup:meta": {
"epss": {
"cve": "CVE-2025-1713",
"date": "2026-11-10",
"epss": "0.00864",
"percentile": "0.58931"
},
"nvd": {
"cve": {
"affected": [
{
"affectedData": [
{
"defaultStatus": "unknown",
"product": "Xen",
"vendor": "Xen",
"versions": [
{
"status": "unknown",
"version": "consult Xen advisory XSA-467"
}
]
}
],
"source": "security@xen.org"
}
],
"configurations": [
{
"nodes": [
{
"cpeMatch": [
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:xen:xen:*:*:*:*:*:*:x86:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "06663CA9-DD05-46D3-872D-A5102E1B3E96",
"versionStartIncluding": "4.0.0",
"vulnerable": true
}
],
"negate": false,
"operator": "OR"
}
]
}
],
"cveTags": [],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "When setting up interrupt remapping for legacy PCI(-X) devices,\nincluding PCI(-X) bridges, a lookup of the upstream bridge is required.\nThis lookup, itself involving acquiring of a lock, is done in a context\nwhere acquiring that lock is unsafe. This can lead to a deadlock."
},
{
"lang": "es",
"value": "Al configurar la reasignaci\u00f3n de interrupciones para dispositivos PCI(-X) antiguos, incluidos los puentes PCI(-X), se requiere una b\u00fasqueda del puente ascendente. Esta b\u00fasqueda, que implica la adquisici\u00f3n de un bloqueo, se realiza en un contexto donde la adquisici\u00f3n de dicho bloqueo no es segura. Esto puede provocar un interbloqueo."
}
],
"id": "CVE-2025-1713",
"lastModified": "2026-06-17T08:39:39.120",
"metrics": {
"cvssMetricV31": [
{
"cvssData": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "HIGH",
"baseScore": 7.5,
"baseSeverity": "HIGH",
"confidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"integrityImpact": "NONE",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H",
"version": "3.1"
},
"exploitabilityScore": 3.9,
"impactScore": 3.6,
"source": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"type": "Secondary"
}
],
"ssvcV203": [
{
"source": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"ssvcData": {
"id": "CVE-2025-1713",
"options": [
{
"exploitation": "none"
},
{
"automatable": "yes"
},
{
"technicalImpact": "partial"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2025-07-17T14:17:20.052947Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
}
}
]
},
"published": "2025-07-17T14:15:30.527",
"references": [
{
"source": "security@xen.org",
"tags": [
"Patch",
"Vendor Advisory"
],
"url": "https://xenbits.xenproject.org/xsa/advisory-467.html"
},
{
"source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"tags": [
"Mailing List",
"Third Party Advisory"
],
"url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2025/02/27/1"
},
{
"source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"tags": [
"Mailing List",
"Third Party Advisory"
],
"url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2025/02/27/3"
},
{
"source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"tags": [
"Mailing List",
"Third Party Advisory"
],
"url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2025/02/28/1"
},
{
"source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"tags": [
"Patch",
"Vendor Advisory"
],
"url": "http://xenbits.xen.org/xsa/advisory-467.html"
}
],
"sourceIdentifier": "security@xen.org",
"vulnStatus": "Analyzed",
"weaknesses": [
{
"description": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "CWE-833"
}
],
"source": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"type": "Secondary"
}
]
}
},
"redhat_vex": {
"current_release_date": "2025-11-21T11:52:43+00:00",
"cve": "CVE-2025-1713",
"id": "CVE-2025-1713",
"initial_release_date": "2025-02-27T15:00:00+00:00",
"product_status:known_not_affected": "1",
"source": "Red Hat CSAF VEX",
"status": "final",
"title": "xen: Deadlock Potential with VT-d and Legacy PCI Device Pass-Through",
"url": "https://security.access.redhat.com/data/csaf/v2/vex/2025/cve-2025-1713.json",
"version": "3"
},
"vulnrichment": {
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2025-07-17T14:04:25.770Z",
"orgId": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"shortName": "CVE"
},
"references": [
{
"url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2025/02/27/1"
},
{
"url": "http://xenbits.xen.org/xsa/advisory-467.html"
},
{
"url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2025/02/27/3"
},
{
"url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2025/02/28/1"
}
],
"title": "CVE Program Container"
},
{
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "HIGH",
"baseScore": 7.5,
"baseSeverity": "HIGH",
"confidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"integrityImpact": "NONE",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H",
"version": "3.1"
}
},
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2025-1713",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "none"
},
{
"Automatable": "yes"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "partial"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2025-07-17T14:17:20.052947Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-833",
"description": "CWE-833 Deadlock",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2025-07-17T14:17:12.279Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"defaultStatus": "unknown",
"product": "Xen",
"vendor": "Xen",
"versions": [
{
"status": "unknown",
"version": "consult Xen advisory XSA-467"
}
]
}
],
"configurations": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "Xen versions 4.0 and later are affected. Xen versions 3.4 and earlier\nare not directly affected, but had other issues.\n\nSystems with Intel IOMMU hardware (VT-d) are affected. Systems using\nAMD or non-x86 hardware are not affected.\n\nOnly systems where certain kinds of devices are passed through to an\nunprivileged guest are vulnerable."
}
],
"datePublic": "2025-02-27T12:52:00.000Z",
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "When setting up interrupt remapping for legacy PCI(-X) devices,\nincluding PCI(-X) bridges, a lookup of the upstream bridge is required.\nThis lookup, itself involving acquiring of a lock, is done in a context\nwhere acquiring that lock is unsafe. This can lead to a deadlock."
}
],
"impacts": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "The passing through of certain kinds of devices to an unprivileged guest\ncan result in a Denial of Service (DoS) affecting the entire host.\n\nNote: Normal usage of such devices by a privileged domain can also\n trigger the issue. In such a scenario, the deadlock is not\n considered a security issue, but just a plain bug."
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2025-07-17T13:59:46.231Z",
"orgId": "23aa2041-22e1-471f-9209-9b7396fa234f",
"shortName": "XEN"
},
"references": [
{
"url": "https://xenbits.xenproject.org/xsa/advisory-467.html"
}
],
"title": "deadlock potential with VT-d and legacy PCI device pass-through",
"workarounds": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "Avoiding the passing through of the affected device types will avoid\nthe vulnerability."
}
]
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "23aa2041-22e1-471f-9209-9b7396fa234f",
"assignerShortName": "XEN",
"cveId": "CVE-2025-1713",
"datePublished": "2025-07-17T13:59:46.231Z",
"dateReserved": "2025-02-26T09:04:42.837Z",
"dateUpdated": "2025-07-17T14:21:42.020Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.1"
}
}
}
Loading…
Loading…
Drag nodes to arrange them. Double-click a related vulnerability to open it, or a source to visit its link. The Physics button on the left tunes the layout and the simulation; the legend at the bottom left hides or shows nodes by kind and by sighting type.
Experimental. This forecast is provided for visualization only and may change without notice. Do not use it for operational decisions.
Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date | Other |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Vulnerability timeline
Sightings and recorded dates, grouped by day · UTC
How durations are calculated
Following the VTEM framework (Black Hat USA 2015), time to patch starts when the vendor or a coordinator was informed, total time to patch at discovery, and disclosure to patch at public disclosure; vendor response time runs from the report to its acknowledgement. Time to exploit and time unpatched start at the earliest discovery or report, falling back to public disclosure. Unpatched time ends at the first recorded patch, or the calculation time when no patch is recorded. Exploitation to patch shows the interval between those two events; a published proof of concept is a public exploit, not exploitation.
Each result shows its source dates. A negative interval means the end event came first; when date-only inputs leave the order open, the result says so. Date-only inputs are approximate. The earliest evidence wins: KEV report dates and sightings are labelled as such. Records describing another vulnerability are listed but never calculated from, and a PoC alone does not establish exploitation. Missing patch evidence does not prove that no patch exists. Filters below change the event list only.
Loading timeline…
Loading…
Loading…
The MITRE ATT&CK techniques below are AI-generated suggestions, inferred from the description of the
vulnerability by the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-classification-roberta-base
model, served locally by ML-Gateway.
They have not been verified by an analyst and are provided for guidance only.
The approach is described in our paper Mapping CVEs to MITRE ATT&CK Techniques: A Curated Gold-Set Classifier and the Limits of LLM-Assisted Label Expansion.
Browse all ATT&CK techniques and the vulnerabilities related to each.
The approach is described in our paper Mapping CVEs to MITRE ATT&CK Techniques: A Curated Gold-Set Classifier and the Limits of LLM-Assisted Label Expansion.
Browse all ATT&CK techniques and the vulnerabilities related to each.
Loading…
Related by attack behaviour
Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.