Action not permitted
Modal body text goes here.
Modal Title
Modal Body
CVE-2023-52764 (GCVE-0-2023-52764)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2024-05-21 15:30 – Updated: 2026-05-11 19:32| Vendor | Product | Version | CPE status | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Linux | Linux |
Affected:
54e8bc5d64a651e2fb8b2366637e6a7d920a4c70 , < 69bba62600bd91d6b7c1e8ca181faf8ac64f7060
(git)
Affected: 54e8bc5d64a651e2fb8b2366637e6a7d920a4c70 , < 2eee8edfff90e22980a6b22079d238c3c9d323bb (git) Affected: 54e8bc5d64a651e2fb8b2366637e6a7d920a4c70 , < 8f83c85ee88225319c52680792320c02158c2a9b (git) Affected: 54e8bc5d64a651e2fb8b2366637e6a7d920a4c70 , < c6b6b8692218da73b33b310d7c1df90f115bdd9a (git) Affected: 54e8bc5d64a651e2fb8b2366637e6a7d920a4c70 , < 09cd8b561aa9796903710a1046957f2b112c8f26 (git) Affected: 54e8bc5d64a651e2fb8b2366637e6a7d920a4c70 , < a647f27a7426d2fe1b40da7c8fa2b81354a51177 (git) Affected: 54e8bc5d64a651e2fb8b2366637e6a7d920a4c70 , < 93bddd6529f187f510eec759f37d0569243c9809 (git) Affected: 54e8bc5d64a651e2fb8b2366637e6a7d920a4c70 , < e2d7149b913d14352c82624e723ce1c211ca06d3 (git) Affected: 54e8bc5d64a651e2fb8b2366637e6a7d920a4c70 , < 099be1822d1f095433f4b08af9cc9d6308ec1953 (git) |
guessed | |
| Linux | Linux |
Affected:
2.6.34
Unaffected: 0 , < 2.6.34 (semver) Unaffected: 4.14.331 , ≤ 4.14.* (semver) Unaffected: 4.19.300 , ≤ 4.19.* (semver) Unaffected: 5.4.262 , ≤ 5.4.* (semver) Unaffected: 5.10.202 , ≤ 5.10.* (semver) Unaffected: 5.15.140 , ≤ 5.15.* (semver) Unaffected: 6.1.64 , ≤ 6.1.* (semver) Unaffected: 6.5.13 , ≤ 6.5.* (semver) Unaffected: 6.6.3 , ≤ 6.6.* (semver) Unaffected: 6.7 , ≤ * (original_commit_for_fix) |
guessed |
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2024-08-02T23:11:35.774Z",
"orgId": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"shortName": "CVE"
},
"references": [
{
"tags": [
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/69bba62600bd91d6b7c1e8ca181faf8ac64f7060"
},
{
"tags": [
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/2eee8edfff90e22980a6b22079d238c3c9d323bb"
},
{
"tags": [
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/8f83c85ee88225319c52680792320c02158c2a9b"
},
{
"tags": [
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/c6b6b8692218da73b33b310d7c1df90f115bdd9a"
},
{
"tags": [
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/09cd8b561aa9796903710a1046957f2b112c8f26"
},
{
"tags": [
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/a647f27a7426d2fe1b40da7c8fa2b81354a51177"
},
{
"tags": [
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/93bddd6529f187f510eec759f37d0569243c9809"
},
{
"tags": [
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/e2d7149b913d14352c82624e723ce1c211ca06d3"
},
{
"tags": [
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/099be1822d1f095433f4b08af9cc9d6308ec1953"
}
],
"title": "CVE Program Container"
},
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2023-52764",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "none"
},
{
"Automatable": "no"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "partial"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2024-09-10T15:37:06.356182Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2024-09-11T17:33:31.755Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "Linux",
"programFiles": [
"drivers/media/usb/gspca/cpia1.c"
],
"repo": "https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git",
"vendor": "Linux",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "69bba62600bd91d6b7c1e8ca181faf8ac64f7060",
"status": "affected",
"version": "54e8bc5d64a651e2fb8b2366637e6a7d920a4c70",
"versionType": "git"
},
{
"lessThan": "2eee8edfff90e22980a6b22079d238c3c9d323bb",
"status": "affected",
"version": "54e8bc5d64a651e2fb8b2366637e6a7d920a4c70",
"versionType": "git"
},
{
"lessThan": "8f83c85ee88225319c52680792320c02158c2a9b",
"status": "affected",
"version": "54e8bc5d64a651e2fb8b2366637e6a7d920a4c70",
"versionType": "git"
},
{
"lessThan": "c6b6b8692218da73b33b310d7c1df90f115bdd9a",
"status": "affected",
"version": "54e8bc5d64a651e2fb8b2366637e6a7d920a4c70",
"versionType": "git"
},
{
"lessThan": "09cd8b561aa9796903710a1046957f2b112c8f26",
"status": "affected",
"version": "54e8bc5d64a651e2fb8b2366637e6a7d920a4c70",
"versionType": "git"
},
{
"lessThan": "a647f27a7426d2fe1b40da7c8fa2b81354a51177",
"status": "affected",
"version": "54e8bc5d64a651e2fb8b2366637e6a7d920a4c70",
"versionType": "git"
},
{
"lessThan": "93bddd6529f187f510eec759f37d0569243c9809",
"status": "affected",
"version": "54e8bc5d64a651e2fb8b2366637e6a7d920a4c70",
"versionType": "git"
},
{
"lessThan": "e2d7149b913d14352c82624e723ce1c211ca06d3",
"status": "affected",
"version": "54e8bc5d64a651e2fb8b2366637e6a7d920a4c70",
"versionType": "git"
},
{
"lessThan": "099be1822d1f095433f4b08af9cc9d6308ec1953",
"status": "affected",
"version": "54e8bc5d64a651e2fb8b2366637e6a7d920a4c70",
"versionType": "git"
}
]
},
{
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Linux",
"programFiles": [
"drivers/media/usb/gspca/cpia1.c"
],
"repo": "https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git",
"vendor": "Linux",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "2.6.34"
},
{
"lessThan": "2.6.34",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "0",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "4.14.*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "4.14.331",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "4.19.*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "4.19.300",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "5.4.*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "5.4.262",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "5.10.*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "5.10.202",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "5.15.*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "5.15.140",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "6.1.*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "6.1.64",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "6.5.*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "6.5.13",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "6.6.*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "6.6.3",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "6.7",
"versionType": "original_commit_for_fix"
}
]
}
],
"cpeApplicability": [
{
"nodes": [
{
"cpeMatch": [
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"versionEndExcluding": "4.14.331",
"versionStartIncluding": "2.6.34",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"versionEndExcluding": "4.19.300",
"versionStartIncluding": "2.6.34",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"versionEndExcluding": "5.4.262",
"versionStartIncluding": "2.6.34",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"versionEndExcluding": "5.10.202",
"versionStartIncluding": "2.6.34",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"versionEndExcluding": "5.15.140",
"versionStartIncluding": "2.6.34",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"versionEndExcluding": "6.1.64",
"versionStartIncluding": "2.6.34",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"versionEndExcluding": "6.5.13",
"versionStartIncluding": "2.6.34",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"versionEndExcluding": "6.6.3",
"versionStartIncluding": "2.6.34",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"versionEndExcluding": "6.7",
"versionStartIncluding": "2.6.34",
"vulnerable": true
}
],
"negate": false,
"operator": "OR"
}
]
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nmedia: gspca: cpia1: shift-out-of-bounds in set_flicker\n\nSyzkaller reported the following issue:\nUBSAN: shift-out-of-bounds in drivers/media/usb/gspca/cpia1.c:1031:27\nshift exponent 245 is too large for 32-bit type \u0027int\u0027\n\nWhen the value of the variable \"sd-\u003eparams.exposure.gain\" exceeds the\nnumber of bits in an integer, a shift-out-of-bounds error is reported. It\nis triggered because the variable \"currentexp\" cannot be left-shifted by\nmore than the number of bits in an integer. In order to avoid invalid\nrange during left-shift, the conditional expression is added."
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-05-11T19:32:41.329Z",
"orgId": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"shortName": "Linux"
},
"references": [
{
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/69bba62600bd91d6b7c1e8ca181faf8ac64f7060"
},
{
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/2eee8edfff90e22980a6b22079d238c3c9d323bb"
},
{
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/8f83c85ee88225319c52680792320c02158c2a9b"
},
{
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/c6b6b8692218da73b33b310d7c1df90f115bdd9a"
},
{
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/09cd8b561aa9796903710a1046957f2b112c8f26"
},
{
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/a647f27a7426d2fe1b40da7c8fa2b81354a51177"
},
{
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/93bddd6529f187f510eec759f37d0569243c9809"
},
{
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/e2d7149b913d14352c82624e723ce1c211ca06d3"
},
{
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/099be1822d1f095433f4b08af9cc9d6308ec1953"
}
],
"title": "media: gspca: cpia1: shift-out-of-bounds in set_flicker",
"x_generator": {
"engine": "bippy-1.2.0"
}
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"assignerShortName": "Linux",
"cveId": "CVE-2023-52764",
"datePublished": "2024-05-21T15:30:49.032Z",
"dateReserved": "2024-05-21T15:19:24.238Z",
"dateUpdated": "2026-05-11T19:32:41.329Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2",
"vulnerability-lookup:meta": {
"epss": {
"cve": "CVE-2023-52764",
"date": "2026-09-19",
"epss": "0.00255",
"percentile": "0.17386"
},
"nvd": {
"cve": {
"affected": [
{
"affectedData": [
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "Linux",
"programFiles": [
"drivers/media/usb/gspca/cpia1.c"
],
"repo": "https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git",
"vendor": "Linux",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "69bba62600bd91d6b7c1e8ca181faf8ac64f7060",
"status": "affected",
"version": "54e8bc5d64a651e2fb8b2366637e6a7d920a4c70",
"versionType": "git"
},
{
"lessThan": "2eee8edfff90e22980a6b22079d238c3c9d323bb",
"status": "affected",
"version": "54e8bc5d64a651e2fb8b2366637e6a7d920a4c70",
"versionType": "git"
},
{
"lessThan": "8f83c85ee88225319c52680792320c02158c2a9b",
"status": "affected",
"version": "54e8bc5d64a651e2fb8b2366637e6a7d920a4c70",
"versionType": "git"
},
{
"lessThan": "c6b6b8692218da73b33b310d7c1df90f115bdd9a",
"status": "affected",
"version": "54e8bc5d64a651e2fb8b2366637e6a7d920a4c70",
"versionType": "git"
},
{
"lessThan": "09cd8b561aa9796903710a1046957f2b112c8f26",
"status": "affected",
"version": "54e8bc5d64a651e2fb8b2366637e6a7d920a4c70",
"versionType": "git"
},
{
"lessThan": "a647f27a7426d2fe1b40da7c8fa2b81354a51177",
"status": "affected",
"version": "54e8bc5d64a651e2fb8b2366637e6a7d920a4c70",
"versionType": "git"
},
{
"lessThan": "93bddd6529f187f510eec759f37d0569243c9809",
"status": "affected",
"version": "54e8bc5d64a651e2fb8b2366637e6a7d920a4c70",
"versionType": "git"
},
{
"lessThan": "e2d7149b913d14352c82624e723ce1c211ca06d3",
"status": "affected",
"version": "54e8bc5d64a651e2fb8b2366637e6a7d920a4c70",
"versionType": "git"
},
{
"lessThan": "099be1822d1f095433f4b08af9cc9d6308ec1953",
"status": "affected",
"version": "54e8bc5d64a651e2fb8b2366637e6a7d920a4c70",
"versionType": "git"
}
]
},
{
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Linux",
"programFiles": [
"drivers/media/usb/gspca/cpia1.c"
],
"repo": "https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git",
"vendor": "Linux",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "2.6.34"
},
{
"lessThan": "2.6.34",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "0",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "4.14.*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "4.14.331",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "4.19.*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "4.19.300",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "5.4.*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "5.4.262",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "5.10.*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "5.10.202",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "5.15.*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "5.15.140",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "6.1.*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "6.1.64",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "6.5.*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "6.5.13",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "6.6.*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "6.6.3",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "6.7",
"versionType": "original_commit_for_fix"
}
]
}
],
"source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67"
}
],
"configurations": [
{
"nodes": [
{
"cpeMatch": [
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "6F120ED7-3012-4856-9F08-B433BC310335",
"versionEndExcluding": "4.14.331",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "C99DDB75-1CAC-40D0-A14D-67A2A55D6005",
"versionEndExcluding": "4.19.300",
"versionStartIncluding": "4.15",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "28B0AAED-45BA-4928-9A85-66A429B9F038",
"versionEndExcluding": "5.4.262",
"versionStartIncluding": "4.20",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "39D508B4-58C7-40C2-BE05-44E41110EB98",
"versionEndExcluding": "5.10.202",
"versionStartIncluding": "5.5",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "15D6C23C-78A3-40D2-B76B-4F1D9C2D95C0",
"versionEndExcluding": "5.15.140",
"versionStartIncluding": "5.11",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "8D7C884A-CAA2-4EA2-9FEB-5CE776D7B05F",
"versionEndExcluding": "6.1.64",
"versionStartIncluding": "5.16",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "674C4F82-C336-4B49-BF64-1DE422E889C4",
"versionEndExcluding": "6.5.13",
"versionStartIncluding": "6.2",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "B58252FA-A49C-411F-9B28-DC5FE44BC5A0",
"versionEndExcluding": "6.6.3",
"versionStartIncluding": "6.6",
"vulnerable": true
}
],
"negate": false,
"operator": "OR"
}
]
}
],
"cveTags": [],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nmedia: gspca: cpia1: shift-out-of-bounds in set_flicker\n\nSyzkaller reported the following issue:\nUBSAN: shift-out-of-bounds in drivers/media/usb/gspca/cpia1.c:1031:27\nshift exponent 245 is too large for 32-bit type \u0027int\u0027\n\nWhen the value of the variable \"sd-\u003eparams.exposure.gain\" exceeds the\nnumber of bits in an integer, a shift-out-of-bounds error is reported. It\nis triggered because the variable \"currentexp\" cannot be left-shifted by\nmore than the number of bits in an integer. In order to avoid invalid\nrange during left-shift, the conditional expression is added."
},
{
"lang": "es",
"value": "En el kernel de Linux, se resolvi\u00f3 la siguiente vulnerabilidad: media: gspca: cpia1: desplazamiento fuera de los l\u00edmites en set_flicker. Syzkaller inform\u00f3 el siguiente problema: UBSAN: desplazamiento fuera de los l\u00edmites en drivers/media/usb/gspca /cpia1.c:1031:27 el exponente de desplazamiento 245 es demasiado grande para el tipo \u0027int\u0027 de 32 bits. Cuando el valor de la variable \"sd-\u0026gt;params.exposure.gain\" excede el n\u00famero de bits en un n\u00famero entero, se realiza un desplazamiento. Se informa un error fuera de los l\u00edmites. Se activa porque la variable \"currentexp\" no puede desplazarse hacia la izquierda m\u00e1s que el n\u00famero de bits de un n\u00famero entero. Para evitar un rango no v\u00e1lido durante el desplazamiento a la izquierda, se agrega la expresi\u00f3n condicional."
}
],
"id": "CVE-2023-52764",
"lastModified": "2026-06-17T06:43:31.553",
"metrics": {
"cvssMetricV31": [
{
"cvssData": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackVector": "LOCAL",
"availabilityImpact": "HIGH",
"baseScore": 7.8,
"baseSeverity": "HIGH",
"confidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
"integrityImpact": "HIGH",
"privilegesRequired": "LOW",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"version": "3.1"
},
"exploitabilityScore": 1.8,
"impactScore": 5.9,
"source": "nvd@nist.gov",
"type": "Primary"
}
],
"ssvcV203": [
{
"source": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"ssvcData": {
"id": "CVE-2023-52764",
"options": [
{
"exploitation": "none"
},
{
"automatable": "no"
},
{
"technicalImpact": "partial"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2024-09-10T15:37:06.356182Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
}
}
]
},
"published": "2024-05-21T16:15:15.700",
"references": [
{
"source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"tags": [
"Patch"
],
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/099be1822d1f095433f4b08af9cc9d6308ec1953"
},
{
"source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"tags": [
"Patch"
],
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/09cd8b561aa9796903710a1046957f2b112c8f26"
},
{
"source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"tags": [
"Patch"
],
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/2eee8edfff90e22980a6b22079d238c3c9d323bb"
},
{
"source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"tags": [
"Patch"
],
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/69bba62600bd91d6b7c1e8ca181faf8ac64f7060"
},
{
"source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"tags": [
"Patch"
],
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/8f83c85ee88225319c52680792320c02158c2a9b"
},
{
"source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"tags": [
"Patch"
],
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/93bddd6529f187f510eec759f37d0569243c9809"
},
{
"source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"tags": [
"Patch"
],
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/a647f27a7426d2fe1b40da7c8fa2b81354a51177"
},
{
"source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"tags": [
"Patch"
],
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/c6b6b8692218da73b33b310d7c1df90f115bdd9a"
},
{
"source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"tags": [
"Patch"
],
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/e2d7149b913d14352c82624e723ce1c211ca06d3"
},
{
"source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"tags": [
"Patch"
],
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/099be1822d1f095433f4b08af9cc9d6308ec1953"
},
{
"source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"tags": [
"Patch"
],
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/09cd8b561aa9796903710a1046957f2b112c8f26"
},
{
"source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"tags": [
"Patch"
],
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/2eee8edfff90e22980a6b22079d238c3c9d323bb"
},
{
"source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"tags": [
"Patch"
],
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/69bba62600bd91d6b7c1e8ca181faf8ac64f7060"
},
{
"source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"tags": [
"Patch"
],
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/8f83c85ee88225319c52680792320c02158c2a9b"
},
{
"source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"tags": [
"Patch"
],
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/93bddd6529f187f510eec759f37d0569243c9809"
},
{
"source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"tags": [
"Patch"
],
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/a647f27a7426d2fe1b40da7c8fa2b81354a51177"
},
{
"source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"tags": [
"Patch"
],
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/c6b6b8692218da73b33b310d7c1df90f115bdd9a"
},
{
"source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"tags": [
"Patch"
],
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/e2d7149b913d14352c82624e723ce1c211ca06d3"
}
],
"sourceIdentifier": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"vulnStatus": "Analyzed",
"weaknesses": [
{
"description": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "CWE-787"
}
],
"source": "nvd@nist.gov",
"type": "Primary"
}
]
}
},
"redhat_vex": {
"aggregate_severity": "Low",
"current_release_date": "2026-06-28T07:44:12+00:00",
"cve": "CVE-2023-52764",
"id": "CVE-2023-52764",
"initial_release_date": "2023-01-01T00:00:00+00:00",
"product_status:fixed": "429",
"product_status:known_affected": "136",
"product_status:known_not_affected": "14",
"source": "Red Hat CSAF VEX",
"status": "final",
"title": "kernel: media: gspca: cpia1: shift-out-of-bounds in set_flicker",
"url": "https://security.access.redhat.com/data/csaf/v2/vex/2023/cve-2023-52764.json",
"version": "3"
},
"vulnrichment": {
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2024-08-02T23:11:35.774Z",
"orgId": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"shortName": "CVE"
},
"references": [
{
"tags": [
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/69bba62600bd91d6b7c1e8ca181faf8ac64f7060"
},
{
"tags": [
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/2eee8edfff90e22980a6b22079d238c3c9d323bb"
},
{
"tags": [
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/8f83c85ee88225319c52680792320c02158c2a9b"
},
{
"tags": [
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/c6b6b8692218da73b33b310d7c1df90f115bdd9a"
},
{
"tags": [
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/09cd8b561aa9796903710a1046957f2b112c8f26"
},
{
"tags": [
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/a647f27a7426d2fe1b40da7c8fa2b81354a51177"
},
{
"tags": [
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/93bddd6529f187f510eec759f37d0569243c9809"
},
{
"tags": [
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/e2d7149b913d14352c82624e723ce1c211ca06d3"
},
{
"tags": [
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/099be1822d1f095433f4b08af9cc9d6308ec1953"
}
],
"title": "CVE Program Container"
},
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2023-52764",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "none"
},
{
"Automatable": "no"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "partial"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2024-09-10T15:37:06.356182Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2024-09-11T12:42:17.164Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "Linux",
"programFiles": [
"drivers/media/usb/gspca/cpia1.c"
],
"repo": "https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git",
"vendor": "Linux",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "69bba62600bd91d6b7c1e8ca181faf8ac64f7060",
"status": "affected",
"version": "54e8bc5d64a651e2fb8b2366637e6a7d920a4c70",
"versionType": "git"
},
{
"lessThan": "2eee8edfff90e22980a6b22079d238c3c9d323bb",
"status": "affected",
"version": "54e8bc5d64a651e2fb8b2366637e6a7d920a4c70",
"versionType": "git"
},
{
"lessThan": "8f83c85ee88225319c52680792320c02158c2a9b",
"status": "affected",
"version": "54e8bc5d64a651e2fb8b2366637e6a7d920a4c70",
"versionType": "git"
},
{
"lessThan": "c6b6b8692218da73b33b310d7c1df90f115bdd9a",
"status": "affected",
"version": "54e8bc5d64a651e2fb8b2366637e6a7d920a4c70",
"versionType": "git"
},
{
"lessThan": "09cd8b561aa9796903710a1046957f2b112c8f26",
"status": "affected",
"version": "54e8bc5d64a651e2fb8b2366637e6a7d920a4c70",
"versionType": "git"
},
{
"lessThan": "a647f27a7426d2fe1b40da7c8fa2b81354a51177",
"status": "affected",
"version": "54e8bc5d64a651e2fb8b2366637e6a7d920a4c70",
"versionType": "git"
},
{
"lessThan": "93bddd6529f187f510eec759f37d0569243c9809",
"status": "affected",
"version": "54e8bc5d64a651e2fb8b2366637e6a7d920a4c70",
"versionType": "git"
},
{
"lessThan": "e2d7149b913d14352c82624e723ce1c211ca06d3",
"status": "affected",
"version": "54e8bc5d64a651e2fb8b2366637e6a7d920a4c70",
"versionType": "git"
},
{
"lessThan": "099be1822d1f095433f4b08af9cc9d6308ec1953",
"status": "affected",
"version": "54e8bc5d64a651e2fb8b2366637e6a7d920a4c70",
"versionType": "git"
}
]
},
{
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Linux",
"programFiles": [
"drivers/media/usb/gspca/cpia1.c"
],
"repo": "https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git",
"vendor": "Linux",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "2.6.34"
},
{
"lessThan": "2.6.34",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "0",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "4.14.*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "4.14.331",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "4.19.*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "4.19.300",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "5.4.*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "5.4.262",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "5.10.*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "5.10.202",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "5.15.*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "5.15.140",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "6.1.*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "6.1.64",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "6.5.*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "6.5.13",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "6.6.*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "6.6.3",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "6.7",
"versionType": "original_commit_for_fix"
}
]
}
],
"cpeApplicability": [
{
"nodes": [
{
"cpeMatch": [
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"versionEndExcluding": "4.14.331",
"versionStartIncluding": "2.6.34",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"versionEndExcluding": "4.19.300",
"versionStartIncluding": "2.6.34",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"versionEndExcluding": "5.4.262",
"versionStartIncluding": "2.6.34",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"versionEndExcluding": "5.10.202",
"versionStartIncluding": "2.6.34",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"versionEndExcluding": "5.15.140",
"versionStartIncluding": "2.6.34",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"versionEndExcluding": "6.1.64",
"versionStartIncluding": "2.6.34",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"versionEndExcluding": "6.5.13",
"versionStartIncluding": "2.6.34",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"versionEndExcluding": "6.6.3",
"versionStartIncluding": "2.6.34",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"versionEndExcluding": "6.7",
"versionStartIncluding": "2.6.34",
"vulnerable": true
}
],
"negate": false,
"operator": "OR"
}
]
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nmedia: gspca: cpia1: shift-out-of-bounds in set_flicker\n\nSyzkaller reported the following issue:\nUBSAN: shift-out-of-bounds in drivers/media/usb/gspca/cpia1.c:1031:27\nshift exponent 245 is too large for 32-bit type \u0027int\u0027\n\nWhen the value of the variable \"sd-\u003eparams.exposure.gain\" exceeds the\nnumber of bits in an integer, a shift-out-of-bounds error is reported. It\nis triggered because the variable \"currentexp\" cannot be left-shifted by\nmore than the number of bits in an integer. In order to avoid invalid\nrange during left-shift, the conditional expression is added."
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-05-11T19:32:41.329Z",
"orgId": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"shortName": "Linux"
},
"references": [
{
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/69bba62600bd91d6b7c1e8ca181faf8ac64f7060"
},
{
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/2eee8edfff90e22980a6b22079d238c3c9d323bb"
},
{
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/8f83c85ee88225319c52680792320c02158c2a9b"
},
{
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/c6b6b8692218da73b33b310d7c1df90f115bdd9a"
},
{
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/09cd8b561aa9796903710a1046957f2b112c8f26"
},
{
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/a647f27a7426d2fe1b40da7c8fa2b81354a51177"
},
{
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/93bddd6529f187f510eec759f37d0569243c9809"
},
{
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/e2d7149b913d14352c82624e723ce1c211ca06d3"
},
{
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/099be1822d1f095433f4b08af9cc9d6308ec1953"
}
],
"title": "media: gspca: cpia1: shift-out-of-bounds in set_flicker",
"x_generator": {
"engine": "bippy-1.2.0"
}
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"assignerShortName": "Linux",
"cveId": "CVE-2023-52764",
"datePublished": "2024-05-21T15:30:49.032Z",
"dateReserved": "2024-05-21T15:19:24.238Z",
"dateUpdated": "2026-05-11T19:32:41.329Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2"
}
}
}
CERTFR-2024-AVI-0958
Vulnerability from certfr_avis - Published: 2024-11-08 - Updated: 2024-11-08
De multiples vulnérabilités ont été découvertes dans les produits IBM. Certaines d'entre elles permettent à un attaquant de provoquer une exécution de code arbitraire à distance, une élévation de privilèges et un déni de service à distance.
Solutions
Se référer au bulletin de sécurité de l'éditeur pour l'obtention des correctifs (cf. section Documentation).
| Vendor | Product | Description | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| IBM | Cloud Pak System | Cloud Pak System versions 2.3.4.x antérieures à 2.3.4.1 | ||
| IBM | VIOS | VIOS version 4.1 avec un fichier tcl.base versions antérieures à 8.6.10.1 | ||
| IBM | Security QRadar EDR | Security QRadar EDR versions 3.12.x antérieures à 3.12.13 | ||
| IBM | VIOS | VIOS version 4.1 avec un fichier python3.9.base versions antérieures à 3.9.20.0 | ||
| IBM | AIX | AIX version 7.2 avec un fichier tcl.base versions antérieures à 8.6.10.1 | ||
| IBM | AIX | AIX version 7.3 avec un fichier python3.9.base versions antérieures à 3.9.20.0 | ||
| IBM | AIX | AIX version 7.3 avec un fichier tcl.base versions antérieures à 8.6.10.1 | ||
| IBM | QRadar SIEM | QRadar SIEM versions 7.5.x antérieures à 7.5.0 UP10 IF01 | ||
| IBM | Cloud Pak System | Cloud Pak System versions 2.3.4.0 avec Db2 versions antérieures à 11.5.9 Special Build | ||
| IBM | Sterling Control Center | Sterling Control Center versions 6.3.1.x antérieures à 6.3.1.0 iFix03 | ||
| IBM | VIOS | VIOS version 3.1 avec un fichier tcl.base versions antérieures à 8.6.10.1 | ||
| IBM | Cloud Pak | Cloud Pak for Security versions antérieures à 1.10.27.0 | ||
| IBM | Cloud Transformation Advisor | Cloud Transformation Advisor versions antérieures à 3.10.2 | ||
| IBM | QRadar Suite Software | QRadar Suite Software versions antérieures à 1.10.27.0 | ||
| IBM | Sterling Control Center | Sterling Control Center versions 6.2.1.x antérieures à 6.2.1.0 iFix14 | ||
| IBM | QRadar Deployment Intelligence App | QRadar Deployment Intelligence App versions antérieures à 3.0.15 |
| Title | Publication Time | Tags | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
{
"$ref": "https://www.cert.ssi.gouv.fr/openapi.json",
"affected_systems": [
{
"description": "Cloud Pak System versions 2.3.4.x ant\u00e9rieures \u00e0 2.3.4.1",
"product": {
"name": "Cloud Pak System",
"vendor": {
"name": "IBM",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "VIOS version 4.1 avec un fichier tcl.base versions ant\u00e9rieures \u00e0 8.6.10.1",
"product": {
"name": "VIOS",
"vendor": {
"name": "IBM",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "Security QRadar EDR versions 3.12.x ant\u00e9rieures \u00e0 3.12.13",
"product": {
"name": "Security QRadar EDR",
"vendor": {
"name": "IBM",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "VIOS version 4.1 avec un fichier python3.9.base versions ant\u00e9rieures \u00e0 3.9.20.0",
"product": {
"name": "VIOS",
"vendor": {
"name": "IBM",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "AIX version 7.2 avec un fichier tcl.base versions ant\u00e9rieures \u00e0 8.6.10.1",
"product": {
"name": "AIX",
"vendor": {
"name": "IBM",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "AIX version 7.3 avec un fichier python3.9.base versions ant\u00e9rieures \u00e0 3.9.20.0",
"product": {
"name": "AIX",
"vendor": {
"name": "IBM",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "AIX version 7.3 avec un fichier tcl.base versions ant\u00e9rieures \u00e0 8.6.10.1",
"product": {
"name": "AIX",
"vendor": {
"name": "IBM",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "QRadar SIEM versions 7.5.x ant\u00e9rieures \u00e0 7.5.0 UP10 IF01",
"product": {
"name": "QRadar SIEM",
"vendor": {
"name": "IBM",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "Cloud Pak System versions 2.3.4.0 avec Db2 versions ant\u00e9rieures \u00e0 11.5.9 Special Build",
"product": {
"name": "Cloud Pak System",
"vendor": {
"name": "IBM",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "Sterling Control Center versions 6.3.1.x ant\u00e9rieures \u00e0 6.3.1.0 iFix03",
"product": {
"name": "Sterling Control Center",
"vendor": {
"name": "IBM",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "VIOS version 3.1 avec un fichier tcl.base versions ant\u00e9rieures \u00e0 8.6.10.1",
"product": {
"name": "VIOS",
"vendor": {
"name": "IBM",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "Cloud Pak for Security versions ant\u00e9rieures \u00e0 1.10.27.0",
"product": {
"name": "Cloud Pak",
"vendor": {
"name": "IBM",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "Cloud Transformation Advisor versions ant\u00e9rieures \u00e0 3.10.2 ",
"product": {
"name": "Cloud Transformation Advisor",
"vendor": {
"name": "IBM",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "QRadar Suite Software versions ant\u00e9rieures \u00e0 1.10.27.0",
"product": {
"name": "QRadar Suite Software",
"vendor": {
"name": "IBM",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "Sterling Control Center versions 6.2.1.x ant\u00e9rieures \u00e0 6.2.1.0 iFix14",
"product": {
"name": "Sterling Control Center",
"vendor": {
"name": "IBM",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "QRadar Deployment Intelligence App versions ant\u00e9rieures \u00e0 3.0.15",
"product": {
"name": "QRadar Deployment Intelligence App",
"vendor": {
"name": "IBM",
"scada": false
}
}
}
],
"affected_systems_content": "",
"content": "## Solutions\n\nSe r\u00e9f\u00e9rer au bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 de l\u0027\u00e9diteur pour l\u0027obtention des correctifs (cf. section Documentation).",
"cves": [
{
"name": "CVE-2020-25659",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-25659"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2020-36242",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-36242"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-23181",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-23181"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-42340",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-42340"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-29885",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-29885"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-34305",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-34305"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2017-7500",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2017-7500"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-25762",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-25762"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-42252",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-42252"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-40897",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-40897"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-0286",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-0286"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-23931",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-23931"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-28708",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-28708"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-24999",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-24999"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-28322",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-28322"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-3446",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-3446"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-2953",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-2953"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-37920",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-37920"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-44487",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-44487"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-38325",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-38325"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-38546",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-38546"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-4807",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-4807"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-5678",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-5678"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-43618",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-43618"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-48795",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-48795"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-28487",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-28487"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-23471",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-23471"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-28486",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-28486"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-25153",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-25153"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-7104",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-7104"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-6129",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-6129"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-46218",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-46218"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-0727",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-0727"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-39325",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-39325"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-25173",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-25173"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-31030",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-31030"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-23648",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-23648"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-28746",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-28746"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52451",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52451"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52584",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52584"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52469",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52469"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52600",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52600"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52463",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52463"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52599",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52599"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-42465",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-42465"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52530",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52530"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26586",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26586"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-27043",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-27043"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-36632",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-36632"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-49083",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-49083"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-2253",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-2253"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-2201",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-2201"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52609",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52609"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2017-7501",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2017-7501"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-25710",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-25710"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-35939",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-35939"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26308",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26308"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-0553",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-0553"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-35938",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-35938"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-50782",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-50782"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-35937",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-35937"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-6597",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-6597"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52591",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52591"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26667",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26667"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52608",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52608"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52486",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52486"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26614",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26614"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-25739",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-25739"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52623",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52623"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52619",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52619"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-29133",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-29133"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-29131",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-29131"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26707",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26707"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26697",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26697"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26704",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26704"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52622",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52622"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26727",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26727"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26718",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26718"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26702",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26702"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26710",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26710"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26810",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26810"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26663",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26663"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26773",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26773"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26660",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26660"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26726",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26726"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26640",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26640"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26802",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26802"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26733",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26733"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26700",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26700"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26772",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26772"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26696",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26696"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26698",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26698"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26714",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26714"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26686",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26686"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2017-11468",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2017-11468"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-45284",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-45284"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52590",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52590"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-46939",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-46939"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26870",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26870"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27025",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27025"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26961",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26961"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26840",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26840"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26958",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26958"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26843",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26843"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26925",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26925"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27388",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27388"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27020",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27020"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26960",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26960"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26820",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26820"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26878",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26878"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26852",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26852"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27065",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27065"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26825",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26825"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27019",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27019"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26668",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26668"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26669",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26669"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52425",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52425"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-21823",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-21823"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-28182",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-28182"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-45288",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-45288"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52653",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52653"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26853",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26853"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48632",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48632"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-29025",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-29025"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35947",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35947"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36017",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36017"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36886",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36886"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36889",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36889"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36904",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36904"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36905",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36905"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36929",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36929"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36933",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36933"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36940",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36940"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36941",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36941"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36950",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36950"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36954",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36954"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47231",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47231"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47284",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47284"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47373",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47373"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47408",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47408"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47449",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47449"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47461",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47461"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47468",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47468"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47491",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47491"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47548",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47548"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52662",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52662"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52679",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52679"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52707",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52707"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52730",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52730"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52756",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52756"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52764",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52764"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52777",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52777"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52791",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52791"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52796",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52796"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52803",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52803"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52811",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52811"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52817",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52817"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52832",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52832"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52834",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52834"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52847",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52847"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52864",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52864"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26921",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26921"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26940",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26940"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27395",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27395"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35801",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35801"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35823",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35823"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35847",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35847"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35912",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35912"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35924",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35924"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35930",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35930"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35938",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35938"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35940",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35940"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35952",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35952"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36006",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36006"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36016",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36016"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36896",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36896"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-29857",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-29857"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-30171",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-30171"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-30172",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-30172"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-5535",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-5535"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52658",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52658"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26740",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26740"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26844",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26844"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26962",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26962"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27434",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27434"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35790",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35790"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35810",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35810"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35814",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35814"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35824",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35824"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35937",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35937"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35946",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35946"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36020",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36020"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36025",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36025"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36921",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36921"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-31076",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-31076"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-33621",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-33621"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35807",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35807"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35893",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35893"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35896",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35896"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35897",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35897"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35899",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35899"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35900",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35900"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35910",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35910"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35925",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35925"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36005",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36005"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36286",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36286"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36960",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36960"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36971",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36971"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38596",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38596"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38598",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38598"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38627",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38627"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-5752",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-5752"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-3651",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-3651"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-2398",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-2398"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-4032",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-4032"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52648",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52648"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-6004",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-6004"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-6918",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-6918"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-0450",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-0450"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-25062",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-25062"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26458",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26458"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26461",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26461"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-28834",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-28834"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-2961",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-2961"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-33599",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-33599"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-33600",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-33600"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-33601",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-33601"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-33602",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-33602"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-34064",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-34064"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-34069",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-34069"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35195",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35195"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-4067",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-4067"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48743",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48743"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48747",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48747"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52762",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52762"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52784",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52784"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52845",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52845"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26842",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26842"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36917",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36917"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36945",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36945"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36978",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36978"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38555",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38555"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38573",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38573"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-22365",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-22365"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-21131",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-21131"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-21138",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-21138"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-21140",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-21140"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-21144",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-21144"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-21145",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-21145"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-21147",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-21147"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26662",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26662"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26703",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26703"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26818",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26818"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26824",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26824"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26831",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26831"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27010",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27010"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27011",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27011"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36270",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36270"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36489",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36489"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38615",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38615"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39276",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39276"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39476",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39476"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39487",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39487"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39495",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39495"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39502",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39502"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40902",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40902"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40927",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40927"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40974",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40974"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36010",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36010"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38575",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38575"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-6923",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-6923"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36000",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36000"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36927",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36927"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36979",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36979"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38538",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38538"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47018",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47018"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47257",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47257"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47304",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47304"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47579",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47579"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47624",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47624"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48757",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48757"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52471",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52471"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52775",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52775"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26837",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26837"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39472",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39472"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-37891",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-37891"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-6345",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-6345"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38808",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38808"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38809",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38809"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27267",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27267"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38428",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38428"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42232",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42232"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42236",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42236"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42244",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42244"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42247",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42247"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-4692",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-4692"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-4693",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-4693"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-7008",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-7008"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-1048",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-1048"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-6232",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-6232"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-6119",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-6119"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39338",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39338"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39689",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39689"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-45491",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-45491"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-45492",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-45492"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38816",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38816"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41042",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41042"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42238",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42238"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42259",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42259"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-43824",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43824"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-43833",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43833"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-43858",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43858"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-42694",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-42694"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-50314",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-50314"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-34155",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-34155"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-34156",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-34156"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-34158",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-34158"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42252",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42252"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-43832",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43832"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-37370",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-37370"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-37371",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-37371"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-45296",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-45296"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42251",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42251"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-43980",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-43980"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-20584",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-20584"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-31356",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-31356"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-36328",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-36328"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-48161",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-48161"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-5115",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-5115"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52596",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52596"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-5764",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-5764"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-21529",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-21529"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-21534",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-21534"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-25620",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-25620"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26147",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26147"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26713",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26713"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26721",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26721"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26823",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26823"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-30203",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-30203"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-30205",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-30205"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-31882",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-31882"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-34447",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-34447"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35136",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35136"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35152",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35152"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-37529",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-37529"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38286",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38286"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39331",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39331"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42254",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42254"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42255",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42255"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42256",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42256"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42258",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42258"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42460",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42460"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-43796",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43796"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-43799",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43799"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-43800",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43800"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-43857",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43857"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-45490",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-45490"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-45590",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-45590"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-45801",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-45801"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46982",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46982"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-47764",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47764"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-47874",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47874"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-47875",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47875"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-7592",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-7592"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-8088",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-8088"
}
],
"initial_release_date": "2024-11-08T00:00:00",
"last_revision_date": "2024-11-08T00:00:00",
"links": [],
"reference": "CERTFR-2024-AVI-0958",
"revisions": [
{
"description": "Version initiale",
"revision_date": "2024-11-08T00:00:00.000000"
}
],
"risks": [
{
"description": "D\u00e9ni de service \u00e0 distance"
},
{
"description": "Injection de code indirecte \u00e0 distance (XSS)"
},
{
"description": "Injection de requ\u00eates ill\u00e9gitimes par rebond (CSRF)"
},
{
"description": "Ex\u00e9cution de code arbitraire \u00e0 distance"
},
{
"description": "Atteinte \u00e0 l\u0027int\u00e9grit\u00e9 des donn\u00e9es"
},
{
"description": "Non sp\u00e9cifi\u00e9 par l\u0027\u00e9diteur"
},
{
"description": "Contournement de la politique de s\u00e9curit\u00e9"
},
{
"description": "Atteinte \u00e0 la confidentialit\u00e9 des donn\u00e9es"
},
{
"description": "\u00c9l\u00e9vation de privil\u00e8ges"
}
],
"summary": "De multiples vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9s ont \u00e9t\u00e9 d\u00e9couvertes dans les produits IBM. Certaines d\u0027entre elles permettent \u00e0 un attaquant de provoquer une ex\u00e9cution de code arbitraire \u00e0 distance, une \u00e9l\u00e9vation de privil\u00e8ges et un d\u00e9ni de service \u00e0 distance.",
"title": "Multiples vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9s dans les produits IBM",
"vendor_advisories": [
{
"published_at": "2024-11-05",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 IBM 7174802",
"url": "https://www.ibm.com/support/pages/node/7174802"
},
{
"published_at": "2024-11-01",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 IBM 7174634",
"url": "https://www.ibm.com/support/pages/node/7174634"
},
{
"published_at": "2024-11-01",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 IBM 7174639",
"url": "https://www.ibm.com/support/pages/node/7174639"
},
{
"published_at": "2024-11-08",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 IBM 7175196",
"url": "https://www.ibm.com/support/pages/node/7175196"
},
{
"published_at": "2024-11-07",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 IBM 7175086",
"url": "https://www.ibm.com/support/pages/node/7175086"
},
{
"published_at": "2024-11-08",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 IBM 7175192",
"url": "https://www.ibm.com/support/pages/node/7175192"
},
{
"published_at": "2024-11-05",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 IBM 7174799",
"url": "https://www.ibm.com/support/pages/node/7174799"
},
{
"published_at": "2024-11-05",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 IBM 7174797",
"url": "https://www.ibm.com/support/pages/node/7174797"
},
{
"published_at": "2024-11-06",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 IBM 7174945",
"url": "https://www.ibm.com/support/pages/node/7174945"
},
{
"published_at": "2024-11-05",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 IBM 7174912",
"url": "https://www.ibm.com/support/pages/node/7174912"
},
{
"published_at": "2024-11-07",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 IBM 7175166",
"url": "https://www.ibm.com/support/pages/node/7175166"
}
]
}
CERTFR-2025-AVI-0669
Vulnerability from certfr_avis - Published: 2025-08-08 - Updated: 2025-08-08
De multiples vulnérabilités ont été découvertes dans le noyau Linux de Red Hat. Certaines d'entre elles permettent à un attaquant de provoquer une élévation de privilèges, une atteinte à la confidentialité des données et un contournement de la politique de sécurité.
Solutions
Se référer au bulletin de sécurité de l'éditeur pour l'obtention des correctifs (cf. section Documentation).
None| Vendor | Product | Description | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Red Hat | N/A | Red Hat Enterprise Linux for x86_64 10 x86_64 | ||
| Red Hat | N/A | Red Hat Enterprise Linux for Power, little endian - Extended Update Support 9.6 ppc64le | ||
| Red Hat | N/A | Red Hat Enterprise Linux for x86_64 9 x86_64 | ||
| Red Hat | N/A | Red Hat Enterprise Linux for Power, little endian 9 ppc64le | ||
| Red Hat | N/A | Red Hat Enterprise Linux for x86_64 - Extended Update Support Extension 8.8 x86_64 | ||
| Red Hat | N/A | Red Hat Enterprise Linux for Power, little endian - Extended Update Support 9.4 ppc64le | ||
| Red Hat | N/A | Red Hat CodeReady Linux Builder for ARM 64 10 aarch64 | ||
| Red Hat | N/A | Red Hat CodeReady Linux Builder for x86_64 - Extended Update Support 10.0 x86_64 | ||
| Red Hat | N/A | Red Hat Enterprise Linux for Power, little endian 10 ppc64le | ||
| Red Hat | N/A | Red Hat Enterprise Linux Server for Power LE - Update Services for SAP Solutions 9.4 ppc64le | ||
| Red Hat | N/A | Red Hat Enterprise Linux for x86_64 - Extended Update Support 9.4 x86_64 | ||
| Red Hat | N/A | Red Hat Enterprise Linux for Power, little endian - Extended Update Support 10.0 ppc64le | ||
| Red Hat | N/A | Red Hat Enterprise Linux for x86_64 - 4 years of updates 10.0 x86_64 | ||
| Red Hat | N/A | Red Hat CodeReady Linux Builder for IBM z Systems 10 s390x | ||
| Red Hat | N/A | Red Hat Enterprise Linux Server - AUS 9.6 x86_64 | ||
| Red Hat | N/A | Red Hat Enterprise Linux for Power, little endian - 4 years of support 10.0 ppc64le | ||
| Red Hat | N/A | Red Hat Enterprise Linux for x86_64 - Extended Update Support 9.6 x86_64 | ||
| Red Hat | N/A | Red Hat Enterprise Linux for IBM z Systems - 4 years of updates 10.0 s390x | ||
| Red Hat | N/A | Red Hat CodeReady Linux Builder for ARM 64 - Extended Update Support 9.4 aarch64 | ||
| Red Hat | N/A | Red Hat Enterprise Linux for x86_64 - Update Services for SAP Solutions 9.4 x86_64 | ||
| Red Hat | N/A | Red Hat CodeReady Linux Builder for ARM 64 - Extended Update Support 9.6 aarch64 | ||
| Red Hat | N/A | Red Hat Enterprise Linux for ARM 64 - Extended Update Support 10.0 aarch64 | ||
| Red Hat | N/A | Red Hat Enterprise Linux Server for Power LE - Update Services for SAP Solutions 9.6 ppc64le | ||
| Red Hat | N/A | Red Hat Enterprise Linux for IBM z Systems - 4 years of updates 9.4 s390x | ||
| Red Hat | N/A | Red Hat CodeReady Linux Builder for x86_64 - Extended Update Support 9.4 x86_64 | ||
| Red Hat | N/A | Red Hat Enterprise Linux for IBM z Systems - Extended Update Support 9.6 s390x | ||
| Red Hat | N/A | Red Hat Enterprise Linux for ARM 64 - Extended Update Support 9.4 aarch64 | ||
| Red Hat | N/A | Red Hat Enterprise Linux Server - TUS 8.8 x86_64 | ||
| Red Hat | N/A | Red Hat Enterprise Linux for IBM z Systems - 4 years of updates 9.0 s390x | ||
| Red Hat | N/A | Red Hat CodeReady Linux Builder for x86_64 - Extended Update Support 9.6 x86_64 | ||
| Red Hat | N/A | Red Hat CodeReady Linux Builder for IBM z Systems - Extended Update Support 10.0 s390x | ||
| Red Hat | N/A | Red Hat Enterprise Linux Server - AUS 9.4 x86_64 | ||
| Red Hat | N/A | Red Hat CodeReady Linux Builder for Power, little endian - Extended Update Support 10.0 ppc64le | ||
| Red Hat | N/A | Red Hat Enterprise Linux for IBM z Systems - Extended Update Support 9.4 s390x | ||
| Red Hat | N/A | Red Hat Enterprise Linux for ARM 64 9 aarch64 | ||
| Red Hat | N/A | Red Hat Enterprise Linux for ARM 64 - Extended Update Support 9.6 aarch64 | ||
| Red Hat | N/A | Red Hat CodeReady Linux Builder for x86_64 10 x86_64 | ||
| Red Hat | N/A | Red Hat Enterprise Linux for x86_64 - Update Services for SAP Solutions 8.8 x86_64 | ||
| Red Hat | N/A | Red Hat CodeReady Linux Builder for Power, little endian 10 ppc64le | ||
| Red Hat | N/A | Red Hat Enterprise Linux Server - AUS 8.4 x86_64 | ||
| Red Hat | N/A | Red Hat Enterprise Linux for Real Time for NFV 8 x86_64 | ||
| Red Hat | N/A | Red Hat Enterprise Linux for x86_64 - Extended Update Support Extension 8.4 x86_64 | ||
| Red Hat | N/A | Red Hat Enterprise Linux for IBM z Systems - 4 years of updates 9.6 s390x | ||
| Red Hat | N/A | Red Hat Enterprise Linux for x86_64 - Update Services for SAP Solutions 9.0 x86_64 | ||
| Red Hat | N/A | Red Hat CodeReady Linux Builder for Power, little endian - Extended Update Support 9.6 ppc64le | ||
| Red Hat | N/A | Red Hat Enterprise Linux Server for Power LE - Update Services for SAP Solutions 9.0 ppc64le | ||
| Red Hat | N/A | Red Hat CodeReady Linux Builder for Power, little endian - Extended Update Support 9.4 ppc64le | ||
| Red Hat | N/A | Red Hat Enterprise Linux for ARM 64 - 4 years of updates 9.0 aarch64 | ||
| Red Hat | N/A | Red Hat CodeReady Linux Builder for Power, little endian 9 ppc64le | ||
| Red Hat | N/A | Red Hat CodeReady Linux Builder for IBM z Systems - Extended Update Support 9.4 s390x | ||
| Red Hat | N/A | Red Hat Enterprise Linux for ARM 64 - 4 years of updates 9.6 aarch64 | ||
| Red Hat | N/A | Red Hat CodeReady Linux Builder for IBM z Systems - Extended Update Support 9.6 s390x | ||
| Red Hat | N/A | Red Hat Enterprise Linux for IBM z Systems - Extended Update Support 10.0 s390x | ||
| Red Hat | N/A | Red Hat Enterprise Linux Server for Power LE - Update Services for SAP Solutions 8.8 ppc64le | ||
| Red Hat | N/A | Red Hat Enterprise Linux for IBM z Systems 9 s390x | ||
| Red Hat | N/A | Red Hat Enterprise Linux for ARM 64 - 4 years of updates 10.0 aarch64 | ||
| Red Hat | N/A | Red Hat Enterprise Linux Server - AUS 8.2 x86_64 | ||
| Red Hat | N/A | Red Hat CodeReady Linux Builder for x86_64 9 x86_64 | ||
| Red Hat | N/A | Red Hat Enterprise Linux for Real Time 8 x86_64 | ||
| Red Hat | N/A | Red Hat Enterprise Linux for x86_64 - Update Services for SAP Solutions 9.6 x86_64 | ||
| Red Hat | N/A | Red Hat Enterprise Linux for ARM 64 10 aarch64 | ||
| Red Hat | N/A | Red Hat Enterprise Linux for IBM z Systems 10 s390x | ||
| Red Hat | N/A | Red Hat CodeReady Linux Builder for ARM 64 - Extended Update Support 10.0 aarch64 | ||
| Red Hat | N/A | Red Hat CodeReady Linux Builder for ARM 64 9 aarch64 | ||
| Red Hat | N/A | Red Hat CodeReady Linux Builder for IBM z Systems 9 s390x | ||
| Red Hat | N/A | Red Hat Enterprise Linux for ARM 64 - 4 years of updates 9.4 aarch64 | ||
| Red Hat | N/A | Red Hat Enterprise Linux for x86_64 - Extended Update Support 10.0 x86_64 |
| Title | Publication Time | Tags | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
{
"$ref": "https://www.cert.ssi.gouv.fr/openapi.json",
"affected_systems": [
{
"description": "Red Hat Enterprise Linux for x86_64 10 x86_64",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Red Hat",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "Red Hat Enterprise Linux for Power, little endian - Extended Update Support 9.6 ppc64le",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Red Hat",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "Red Hat Enterprise Linux for x86_64 9 x86_64",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Red Hat",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "Red Hat Enterprise Linux for Power, little endian 9 ppc64le",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Red Hat",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "Red Hat Enterprise Linux for x86_64 - Extended Update Support Extension 8.8 x86_64",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Red Hat",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "Red Hat Enterprise Linux for Power, little endian - Extended Update Support 9.4 ppc64le",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Red Hat",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "Red Hat CodeReady Linux Builder for ARM 64 10 aarch64",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Red Hat",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "Red Hat CodeReady Linux Builder for x86_64 - Extended Update Support 10.0 x86_64",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Red Hat",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "Red Hat Enterprise Linux for Power, little endian 10 ppc64le",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Red Hat",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "Red Hat Enterprise Linux Server for Power LE - Update Services for SAP Solutions 9.4 ppc64le",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Red Hat",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "Red Hat Enterprise Linux for x86_64 - Extended Update Support 9.4 x86_64",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Red Hat",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "Red Hat Enterprise Linux for Power, little endian - Extended Update Support 10.0 ppc64le",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Red Hat",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "Red Hat Enterprise Linux for x86_64 - 4 years of updates 10.0 x86_64",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Red Hat",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "Red Hat CodeReady Linux Builder for IBM z Systems 10 s390x",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Red Hat",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "Red Hat Enterprise Linux Server - AUS 9.6 x86_64",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Red Hat",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "Red Hat Enterprise Linux for Power, little endian - 4 years of support 10.0 ppc64le",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Red Hat",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "Red Hat Enterprise Linux for x86_64 - Extended Update Support 9.6 x86_64",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Red Hat",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "Red Hat Enterprise Linux for IBM z Systems - 4 years of updates 10.0 s390x",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Red Hat",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "Red Hat CodeReady Linux Builder for ARM 64 - Extended Update Support 9.4 aarch64",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Red Hat",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "Red Hat Enterprise Linux for x86_64 - Update Services for SAP Solutions 9.4 x86_64",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Red Hat",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "Red Hat CodeReady Linux Builder for ARM 64 - Extended Update Support 9.6 aarch64",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Red Hat",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "Red Hat Enterprise Linux for ARM 64 - Extended Update Support 10.0 aarch64",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Red Hat",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "Red Hat Enterprise Linux Server for Power LE - Update Services for SAP Solutions 9.6 ppc64le",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Red Hat",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "Red Hat Enterprise Linux for IBM z Systems - 4 years of updates 9.4 s390x",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Red Hat",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "Red Hat CodeReady Linux Builder for x86_64 - Extended Update Support 9.4 x86_64",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Red Hat",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "Red Hat Enterprise Linux for IBM z Systems - Extended Update Support 9.6 s390x",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Red Hat",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "Red Hat Enterprise Linux for ARM 64 - Extended Update Support 9.4 aarch64",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Red Hat",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "Red Hat Enterprise Linux Server - TUS 8.8 x86_64",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Red Hat",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "Red Hat Enterprise Linux for IBM z Systems - 4 years of updates 9.0 s390x",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Red Hat",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "Red Hat CodeReady Linux Builder for x86_64 - Extended Update Support 9.6 x86_64",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Red Hat",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "Red Hat CodeReady Linux Builder for IBM z Systems - Extended Update Support 10.0 s390x",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Red Hat",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "Red Hat Enterprise Linux Server - AUS 9.4 x86_64",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Red Hat",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "Red Hat CodeReady Linux Builder for Power, little endian - Extended Update Support 10.0 ppc64le",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Red Hat",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "Red Hat Enterprise Linux for IBM z Systems - Extended Update Support 9.4 s390x",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Red Hat",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "Red Hat Enterprise Linux for ARM 64 9 aarch64",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Red Hat",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "Red Hat Enterprise Linux for ARM 64 - Extended Update Support 9.6 aarch64",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Red Hat",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "Red Hat CodeReady Linux Builder for x86_64 10 x86_64",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Red Hat",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "Red Hat Enterprise Linux for x86_64 - Update Services for SAP Solutions 8.8 x86_64",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Red Hat",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "Red Hat CodeReady Linux Builder for Power, little endian 10 ppc64le",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Red Hat",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "Red Hat Enterprise Linux Server - AUS 8.4 x86_64",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Red Hat",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "Red Hat Enterprise Linux for Real Time for NFV 8 x86_64",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Red Hat",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "Red Hat Enterprise Linux for x86_64 - Extended Update Support Extension 8.4 x86_64",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Red Hat",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "Red Hat Enterprise Linux for IBM z Systems - 4 years of updates 9.6 s390x",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Red Hat",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "Red Hat Enterprise Linux for x86_64 - Update Services for SAP Solutions 9.0 x86_64",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Red Hat",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "Red Hat CodeReady Linux Builder for Power, little endian - Extended Update Support 9.6 ppc64le",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Red Hat",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "Red Hat Enterprise Linux Server for Power LE - Update Services for SAP Solutions 9.0 ppc64le",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Red Hat",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "Red Hat CodeReady Linux Builder for Power, little endian - Extended Update Support 9.4 ppc64le",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Red Hat",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "Red Hat Enterprise Linux for ARM 64 - 4 years of updates 9.0 aarch64",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Red Hat",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "Red Hat CodeReady Linux Builder for Power, little endian 9 ppc64le",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Red Hat",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "Red Hat CodeReady Linux Builder for IBM z Systems - Extended Update Support 9.4 s390x",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Red Hat",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "Red Hat Enterprise Linux for ARM 64 - 4 years of updates 9.6 aarch64",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Red Hat",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "Red Hat CodeReady Linux Builder for IBM z Systems - Extended Update Support 9.6 s390x",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Red Hat",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "Red Hat Enterprise Linux for IBM z Systems - Extended Update Support 10.0 s390x",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Red Hat",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "Red Hat Enterprise Linux Server for Power LE - Update Services for SAP Solutions 8.8 ppc64le",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Red Hat",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "Red Hat Enterprise Linux for IBM z Systems 9 s390x",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Red Hat",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "Red Hat Enterprise Linux for ARM 64 - 4 years of updates 10.0 aarch64",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Red Hat",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "Red Hat Enterprise Linux Server - AUS 8.2 x86_64",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Red Hat",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "Red Hat CodeReady Linux Builder for x86_64 9 x86_64",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Red Hat",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "Red Hat Enterprise Linux for Real Time 8 x86_64",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Red Hat",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "Red Hat Enterprise Linux for x86_64 - Update Services for SAP Solutions 9.6 x86_64",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Red Hat",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "Red Hat Enterprise Linux for ARM 64 10 aarch64",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Red Hat",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "Red Hat Enterprise Linux for IBM z Systems 10 s390x",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Red Hat",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "Red Hat CodeReady Linux Builder for ARM 64 - Extended Update Support 10.0 aarch64",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Red Hat",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "Red Hat CodeReady Linux Builder for ARM 64 9 aarch64",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Red Hat",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "Red Hat CodeReady Linux Builder for IBM z Systems 9 s390x",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Red Hat",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "Red Hat Enterprise Linux for ARM 64 - 4 years of updates 9.4 aarch64",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Red Hat",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "Red Hat Enterprise Linux for x86_64 - Extended Update Support 10.0 x86_64",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Red Hat",
"scada": false
}
}
}
],
"affected_systems_content": null,
"content": "## Solutions\n\nSe r\u00e9f\u00e9rer au bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 de l\u0027\u00e9diteur pour l\u0027obtention des correctifs (cf. section Documentation).",
"cves": [
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26934",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26934"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27059",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27059"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36945",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36945"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-50020",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-50020"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38087",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38087"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-57980",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57980"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26964",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26964"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21727",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21727"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49995",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49995"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-22004",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22004"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21929",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21929"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49058",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49058"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52764",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52764"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37958",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37958"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-43888",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43888"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38086",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38086"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52877",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52877"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38079",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38079"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52451",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52451"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37738",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37738"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-22113",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22113"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47527",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47527"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-22085",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22085"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21928",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21928"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-50022",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-50022"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37890",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37890"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-22020",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22020"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49395",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49395"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26659",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26659"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-58002",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-58002"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21905",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21905"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38052",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38052"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49788",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49788"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38264",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38264"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21991",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21991"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48669",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48669"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21962",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21962"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-23150",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23150"
}
],
"initial_release_date": "2025-08-08T00:00:00",
"last_revision_date": "2025-08-08T00:00:00",
"links": [],
"reference": "CERTFR-2025-AVI-0669",
"revisions": [
{
"description": "Version initiale",
"revision_date": "2025-08-08T00:00:00.000000"
}
],
"risks": [
{
"description": "Non sp\u00e9cifi\u00e9 par l\u0027\u00e9diteur"
},
{
"description": "D\u00e9ni de service"
},
{
"description": "Contournement de la politique de s\u00e9curit\u00e9"
},
{
"description": "Atteinte \u00e0 la confidentialit\u00e9 des donn\u00e9es"
},
{
"description": "\u00c9l\u00e9vation de privil\u00e8ges"
}
],
"summary": "De multiples vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9s ont \u00e9t\u00e9 d\u00e9couvertes dans le noyau Linux de Red Hat. Certaines d\u0027entre elles permettent \u00e0 un attaquant de provoquer une \u00e9l\u00e9vation de privil\u00e8ges, une atteinte \u00e0 la confidentialit\u00e9 des donn\u00e9es et un contournement de la politique de s\u00e9curit\u00e9.",
"title": "Multiples vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9s dans le noyau Linux de Red Hat",
"vendor_advisories": [
{
"published_at": "2025-08-05",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 Red Hat RHSA-2025:13061",
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2025:13061"
},
{
"published_at": "2025-08-06",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 Red Hat RHSA-2025:13120",
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2025:13120"
},
{
"published_at": "2025-08-04",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 Red Hat RHSA-2025:12746",
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2025:12746"
},
{
"published_at": "2025-08-05",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 Red Hat RHSA-2025:13030",
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2025:13030"
},
{
"published_at": "2025-08-06",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 Red Hat RHSA-2025:13135",
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2025:13135"
},
{
"published_at": "2025-08-04",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 Red Hat RHSA-2025:12525",
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2025:12525"
},
{
"published_at": "2025-08-04",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 Red Hat RHSA-2025:12753",
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2025:12753"
},
{
"published_at": "2025-08-04",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 Red Hat RHSA-2025:12662",
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2025:12662"
},
{
"published_at": "2025-08-04",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 Red Hat RHSA-2025:12623",
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2025:12623"
},
{
"published_at": "2025-08-05",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 Red Hat RHSA-2025:13029",
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2025:13029"
}
]
}
CERTFR-2025-AVI-0677
Vulnerability from certfr_avis - Published: 2025-08-12 - Updated: 2025-08-12
De multiples vulnérabilités ont été découvertes dans les produits Siemens. Certaines d'entre elles permettent à un attaquant de provoquer une exécution de code arbitraire à distance, une élévation de privilèges et un déni de service à distance.
Solutions
Se référer au bulletin de sécurité de l'éditeur pour l'obtention des correctifs (cf. section Documentation).
| Vendor | Product | Description | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Siemens | N/A | SIMATIC PCS neo V6.0 versions antérieures à V6.0 SP1 | ||
| Siemens | N/A | SIMATIC WinCC V17, v18 et V20 toutes versions pour les vulnérabilités CVE-2024-54678 et CVE-2025-40759 | ||
| Siemens | N/A | SIMATIC Control Function Library (CFL) toutes versions pour la vulnérabilité CVE-2025-30033 | ||
| Siemens | N/A | SIPROTEC 5 versions antérieures à 10.0 | ||
| Siemens | N/A | SIMATIC MTP Integrator toutes versions pour la vulnérabilité CVE-2025-30033 | ||
| Siemens | N/A | SIMATIC ProSave V17 toutes versions pour la vulnérabilité CVE-2025-30033 | ||
| Siemens | N/A | SIMATIC WinCC Unified Line Coordination toutes versions pour la vulnérabilité CVE-2025-30033 | ||
| Siemens | N/A | SIMATIC WinCC TeleControl toutes versions pour la vulnérabilité CVE-2025-30033 | ||
| Siemens | N/A | SIMATIC WinCC OA V3.19 versions antérieures à V3.19 P020 | ||
| Siemens | N/A | SIMATIC WinCC flexible ES toutes versions pour la vulnérabilité CVE-2025-30033 | ||
| Siemens | N/A | SIMATIC S7-PLCSIM V17 toutes versions. L'éditeur indique que le produit ne bénéficiera pas de correctif de sécurité pour la vulnérabilité CVE-2024-54678. | ||
| Siemens | N/A | SIMATIC S7-Fail-safe Configuration Tool (S7-FCT) versions antérieures à 4.0.1 | ||
| Siemens | N/A | SIMATIC PCS neo V6.0 toutes versions pour la vulnérabilité CVE-2024-54678 | ||
| Siemens | N/A | SIMATIC eaSie Core Package (6DL5424-0AX00-0AV8) toutes versions pour la vulnérabilité CVE-2025-30033 | ||
| Siemens | N/A | SIMATIC MTP CREATOR V2.x et V3.x toutes versions. L'éditeur indique que le produit ne bénéficiera pas de correctif de sécurité pour la vulnérabilité CVE-2025-30033. | ||
| Siemens | N/A | SIMATIC WinCC OA V3.18 versions antérieures à V3.18 P032 | ||
| Siemens | N/A | TIA Portal Cloud V19 versions antérieures à 5.2.1.1 | ||
| Siemens | N/A | SIMATIC D7-SYS toutes versions pour la vulnérabilité CVE-2025-30033 | ||
| Siemens | N/A | SIMATIC BATCH V10.0 toutes versions pour la vulnérabilité CVE-2025-30033 | ||
| Siemens | N/A | SIMATIC ODK 1500S toutes versions pour la vulnérabilité CVE-2025-30033 | ||
| Siemens | N/A | SIMATIC Process Historian 2020 toutes versions. L'éditeur indique que le produit ne bénéficiera pas de correctif de sécurité pour les vulnérabilités CVE-2025-30033 et CVE-2025-47809 | ||
| Siemens | N/A | SIMATIC S7-1500 Software Controller V2 toutes versions pour la vulnérabilité CVE-2025-30033 | ||
| Siemens | N/A | TIA Portal Cloud Connector toutes versions pour la vulnérabilité CVE-2025-30033 | ||
| Siemens | N/A | SIMATIC WinCC Unified Sequence toutes versions pour la vulnérabilité CVE-2025-30033 | ||
| Siemens | N/A | SIMATIC S7-PLCSIM V17 toutes versions. L'éditeur indique que le produit ne bénéficiera pas de correctif de sécurité pour la vulnérabilité CVE-2025-40759. | ||
| Siemens | N/A | SIMATIC WinCC Runtime Advanced toutes versions pour la vulnérabilité CVE-2025-30033 | ||
| Siemens | N/A | SIMATIC Logon V2.0 toutes versions pour la vulnérabilité CVE-2025-30033 | ||
| Siemens | N/A | SIMATIC ProSave V19 versions antérieures à V19 Update 4 | ||
| Siemens | N/A | SIMATIC PDM Maintenance Station V5.0 toutes versions pour les vulnérabilités CVE-2025-30033 et CVE-2025-47809 | ||
| Siemens | N/A | SIMATIC Safety Matrix toutes versions pour la vulnérabilité CVE-2025-30033 | ||
| Siemens | N/A | SIMATIC Management Console toutes versions pour la vulnérabilité CVE-2025-30033 | ||
| Siemens | N/A | SCALANCE XCM-/XRM-/XCH-/XRH-300 family versions antérieures à 3.2 | ||
| Siemens | N/A | SIMATIC BATCH V9.1 toutes versions. L'éditeur indique que le produit ne bénéficiera pas de correctif de sécurité pour la vulnérabilité CVE-2025-30033. | ||
| Siemens | N/A | SIMATIC Process Function Library (PFL) V4.0 toutes versions. L'éditeur indique que le produit ne bénéficiera pas de correctif de sécurité pour la vulnérabilité CVE-2025-30033. | ||
| Siemens | N/A | SIMATIC S7-1500 Software Controller V3 toutes versions pour la vulnérabilité CVE-2025-30033 | ||
| Siemens | N/A | SIMATIC STEP 7 CFC V20 toutes versions. L'éditeur indique que le produit ne bénéficiera pas de correctif de sécurité pour la vulnérabilité CVE-2025-30033. | ||
| Siemens | N/A | SIMATIC NET PC Software toutes versions pour la vulnérabilité CVE-2025-30033 | ||
| Siemens | N/A | SIMATIC Route Control V9.1 toutes versions pour la vulnérabilité CVE-2025-30033 | ||
| Siemens | N/A | SIMATIC Process Historian 2022 toutes versions pour la vulnérabilité CVE-2025-30033 | ||
| Siemens | N/A | SIMATIC WinCC OA V3.20 versions antérieures à V3.20 P008 | ||
| Siemens | N/A | SIMATIC RTLS Locating Manager versions antérieures à 3.3 | ||
| Siemens | N/A | Siprotec 4 7SA6, 7SD5 et 7SD610 versions antérieures à 4.78 | ||
| Siemens | N/A | SIMATIC Automation Tool toutes versions pour la vulnérabilité CVE-2025-30033 | ||
| Siemens | N/A | TIA Portal Cloud V18 toutes versions pour les vulnérabilités CVE-2024-54678 et CVE-2025-40759 | ||
| Siemens | N/A | SIMATIC PDM V9.2 et V9.3 toutes versions pour la vulnérabilité CVE-2025-30033 | ||
| Siemens | N/A | SIMATIC WinCC Runtime Professional toutes versions pour la vulnérabilité CVE-2025-30033 | ||
| Siemens | N/A | SIMATIC WinCC Visualization Architect (SiVArc) toutes versions pour la vulnérabilité CVE-2025-30033 | ||
| Siemens | N/A | SIMATIC eaSie Workflow Skills toutes versions pour la vulnérabilité CVE-2025-30033 | ||
| Siemens | N/A | SIMATIC STEP 7 CFC V19 toutes versions. L'éditeur indique que le produit ne bénéficiera pas de correctif de sécurité pour la vulnérabilité CVE-2025-30033. | ||
| Siemens | N/A | SIMATIC WinCC V19 versions antérieures à V19 Update 4 | ||
| Siemens | N/A | SIMATIC Management Agent toutes versions pour la vulnérabilité CVE-2025-30033 | ||
| Siemens | N/A | SIMATIC WinCC V7.5 et V8.0 toutes versions pour la vulnérabilité CVE-2025-30033 | ||
| Siemens | N/A | SIMATIC STEP 7 V5.7 toutes versions pour la vulnérabilité CVE-2025-30033 | ||
| Siemens | N/A | SIMATIC Automation Tool SDK Windows toutes versions pour la vulnérabilité CVE-2025-30033 | ||
| Siemens | N/A | SIMATIC Process Historian 2022 toutes versions pour la vulnérabilité CVE-2025-47809 | ||
| Siemens | N/A | SIMATIC S7-PLCSIM V20 versions antérieures à V20 Update 1 | ||
| Siemens | N/A | TIA Portal Cloud V17 toutes versions pour les vulnérabilités CVE-2024-54678 et CVE-2025-40759 | ||
| Siemens | N/A | SIMATIC Energy Suite toutes versions pour la vulnérabilité CVE-2025-30033 | ||
| Siemens | N/A | SIMATIC PCS 7 toutes versions pour la vulnérabilité CVE-2025-30033 | ||
| Siemens | N/A | SIMATIC Process Historian 2024 toutes versions pour la vulnérabilité CVE-2025-30033 | ||
| Siemens | N/A | SIMATIC STEP 7 V19 versions antérieures à V19 Update 4 | ||
| Siemens | N/A | TIA Portal Test Suite V17, v18, v19 et v20 toutes versions pour la vulnérabilité CVE-2025-30033 | ||
| Siemens | N/A | SIMATIC S7-PCT toutes versions pour la vulnérabilité CVE-2025-30033 | ||
| Siemens | N/A | SIMATIC Target toutes versions pour la vulnérabilité CVE-2025-30033 | ||
| Siemens | N/A | SIMATIC ProSave V18 toutes versions. L'éditeur indique que le produit ne bénéficiera pas de correctif de sécurité pour la vulnérabilité CVE-2025-30033. | ||
| Siemens | N/A | SIMATIC Logon V1.6 toutes versions. L'éditeur indique que le produit ne bénéficiera pas de correctif de sécurité pour la vulnérabilité CVE-2025-30033. | ||
| Siemens | N/A | SIMATIC STEP 7 V17 et V18 toutes versions pour les vulnérabilités CVE-2024-54678 et CVE-2025-40759 | ||
| Siemens | N/A | SIMATIC RTLS Locating Manager versions antérieures à 3.2 | ||
| Siemens | N/A | SIMATIC S7-PLCSIM Advanced versions antérieures à V7.0 Update 1 | ||
| Siemens | N/A | SIMATIC PCS neo V5.0 toutes versions pour la vulnérabilité CVE-2024-54678 | ||
| Siemens | N/A | SIMATIC STEP 7 V20 toutes versions pour les vulnérabilités CVE-2024-54678 et CVE-2025-40759 | ||
| Siemens | N/A | TIA Portal Cloud V20 toutes versions pour les vulnérabilités CVE-2024-54678 et CVE-2025-40759 | ||
| Siemens | N/A | Siprotec 4 toutes versions et tous modèles exceptés 7SA6, 7SD5, 7SD610 pour la vulnérabilité CVE-2024-52504. | ||
| Siemens | N/A | SIMATIC eaSie PCS 7 Skill Package (6DL5424-0BX00-0AV8) toutes versions pour la vulnérabilité CVE-2025-30033 | ||
| Siemens | N/A | SCALANCE XC-300/XR-300/XC-400/XR-500WG/XR-500 versions antérieures à 3.2 | ||
| Siemens | N/A | SIMATIC S7-PLCSIM V17, V18 et V19 toutes versions pour la vulnérabilité CVE-2025-30033 | ||
| Siemens | N/A | SIMATIC WinCC Unified PC Runtime V18, V19 et V20 toutes versions pour la vulnérabilité CVE-2025-30033 | ||
| Siemens | N/A | SIMATIC PCS 7 Advanced Process Faceplates V9.1 toutes versions pour la vulnérabilité CVE-2025-30033 | ||
| Siemens | N/A | SIMATIC S7 F Systems V6.4 toutes versions pour la vulnérabilité CVE-2025-30033 | ||
| Siemens | N/A | SIMATIC Information Server toutes versions pour la vulnérabilité CVE-2025-47809 | ||
| Siemens | N/A | SIMATIC S7 F Systems V6.3 toutes versions. L'éditeur indique que le produit ne bénéficiera pas de correctif de sécurité pour la vulnérabilité CVE-2025-30033. | ||
| Siemens | N/A | SIMATIC ProSave V20 toutes versions pour la vulnérabilité CVE-2025-30033 | ||
| Siemens | N/A | SIMATIC PCS 7 Logic Matrix V9.1 toutes versions pour la vulnérabilité CVE-2025-30033 | ||
| Siemens | N/A | WinCC Panel Image Setup toutes versions pour la vulnérabilité CVE-2025-30033 | ||
| Siemens | N/A | SIMATIC PCS neo V4.1 et V5.0 toutes versions. L'éditeur indique que le produit ne bénéficiera pas de correctif de sécurité pour la vulnérabilité CVE-2024-54678. | ||
| Siemens | N/A | SIMATIC Route Control V10.0 toutes versions pour la vulnérabilité CVE-2025-30033 | ||
| Siemens | N/A | SIMATIC WinCC V8.1 versions antérieures à V8.1 Update 3 |
| Title | Publication Time | Tags | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
{
"$ref": "https://www.cert.ssi.gouv.fr/openapi.json",
"affected_systems": [
{
"description": "SIMATIC PCS neo V6.0 versions ant\u00e9rieures \u00e0 V6.0 SP1",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Siemens",
"scada": true
}
}
},
{
"description": "SIMATIC WinCC V17, v18 et V20 toutes versions pour les vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9s CVE-2024-54678 et CVE-2025-40759",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Siemens",
"scada": true
}
}
},
{
"description": "SIMATIC Control Function Library (CFL) toutes versions pour la vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9 CVE-2025-30033",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Siemens",
"scada": true
}
}
},
{
"description": "SIPROTEC 5 versions ant\u00e9rieures \u00e0 10.0",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Siemens",
"scada": true
}
}
},
{
"description": "SIMATIC MTP Integrator toutes versions pour la vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9 CVE-2025-30033",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Siemens",
"scada": true
}
}
},
{
"description": "SIMATIC ProSave V17 toutes versions pour la vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9 CVE-2025-30033",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Siemens",
"scada": true
}
}
},
{
"description": "SIMATIC WinCC Unified Line Coordination toutes versions pour la vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9 CVE-2025-30033",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Siemens",
"scada": true
}
}
},
{
"description": "SIMATIC WinCC TeleControl toutes versions pour la vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9 CVE-2025-30033",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Siemens",
"scada": true
}
}
},
{
"description": "SIMATIC WinCC OA V3.19 versions ant\u00e9rieures \u00e0 V3.19 P020",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Siemens",
"scada": true
}
}
},
{
"description": "SIMATIC WinCC flexible ES toutes versions pour la vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9 CVE-2025-30033",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Siemens",
"scada": true
}
}
},
{
"description": "SIMATIC S7-PLCSIM V17 toutes versions. L\u0027\u00e9diteur indique que le produit ne b\u00e9n\u00e9ficiera pas de correctif de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 pour la vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9 CVE-2024-54678.",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Siemens",
"scada": true
}
}
},
{
"description": "SIMATIC S7-Fail-safe Configuration Tool (S7-FCT) versions ant\u00e9rieures \u00e0 4.0.1",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Siemens",
"scada": true
}
}
},
{
"description": "SIMATIC PCS neo V6.0 toutes versions pour la vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9 CVE-2024-54678",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Siemens",
"scada": true
}
}
},
{
"description": "SIMATIC eaSie Core Package (6DL5424-0AX00-0AV8) toutes versions pour la vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9 CVE-2025-30033",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Siemens",
"scada": true
}
}
},
{
"description": "SIMATIC MTP CREATOR V2.x et V3.x toutes versions. L\u0027\u00e9diteur indique que le produit ne b\u00e9n\u00e9ficiera pas de correctif de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 pour la vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9 CVE-2025-30033.",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Siemens",
"scada": true
}
}
},
{
"description": "SIMATIC WinCC OA V3.18 versions ant\u00e9rieures \u00e0 V3.18 P032",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Siemens",
"scada": true
}
}
},
{
"description": "TIA Portal Cloud V19 versions ant\u00e9rieures \u00e0 5.2.1.1",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Siemens",
"scada": true
}
}
},
{
"description": "SIMATIC D7-SYS toutes versions pour la vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9 CVE-2025-30033",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Siemens",
"scada": true
}
}
},
{
"description": "SIMATIC BATCH V10.0 toutes versions pour la vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9 CVE-2025-30033",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Siemens",
"scada": true
}
}
},
{
"description": "SIMATIC ODK 1500S toutes versions pour la vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9 CVE-2025-30033",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Siemens",
"scada": true
}
}
},
{
"description": "SIMATIC Process Historian 2020 toutes versions. L\u0027\u00e9diteur indique que le produit ne b\u00e9n\u00e9ficiera pas de correctif de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 pour les vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9s CVE-2025-30033 et CVE-2025-47809",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Siemens",
"scada": true
}
}
},
{
"description": "SIMATIC S7-1500 Software Controller V2 toutes versions pour la vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9 CVE-2025-30033",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Siemens",
"scada": true
}
}
},
{
"description": "TIA Portal Cloud Connector toutes versions pour la vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9 CVE-2025-30033",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Siemens",
"scada": true
}
}
},
{
"description": "SIMATIC WinCC Unified Sequence toutes versions pour la vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9 CVE-2025-30033",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Siemens",
"scada": true
}
}
},
{
"description": "SIMATIC S7-PLCSIM V17 toutes versions. L\u0027\u00e9diteur indique que le produit ne b\u00e9n\u00e9ficiera pas de correctif de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 pour la vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9 CVE-2025-40759.",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Siemens",
"scada": true
}
}
},
{
"description": "SIMATIC WinCC Runtime Advanced toutes versions pour la vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9 CVE-2025-30033",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Siemens",
"scada": true
}
}
},
{
"description": "SIMATIC Logon V2.0 toutes versions pour la vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9 CVE-2025-30033",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Siemens",
"scada": true
}
}
},
{
"description": "SIMATIC ProSave V19 versions ant\u00e9rieures \u00e0 V19 Update 4",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Siemens",
"scada": true
}
}
},
{
"description": "SIMATIC PDM Maintenance Station V5.0 toutes versions pour les vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9s CVE-2025-30033 et CVE-2025-47809",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Siemens",
"scada": true
}
}
},
{
"description": "SIMATIC Safety Matrix toutes versions pour la vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9 CVE-2025-30033",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Siemens",
"scada": true
}
}
},
{
"description": "SIMATIC Management Console toutes versions pour la vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9 CVE-2025-30033",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Siemens",
"scada": true
}
}
},
{
"description": "SCALANCE XCM-/XRM-/XCH-/XRH-300 family versions ant\u00e9rieures \u00e0 3.2",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Siemens",
"scada": true
}
}
},
{
"description": "SIMATIC BATCH V9.1 toutes versions. L\u0027\u00e9diteur indique que le produit ne b\u00e9n\u00e9ficiera pas de correctif de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 pour la vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9 CVE-2025-30033.",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Siemens",
"scada": true
}
}
},
{
"description": "SIMATIC Process Function Library (PFL) V4.0 toutes versions. L\u0027\u00e9diteur indique que le produit ne b\u00e9n\u00e9ficiera pas de correctif de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 pour la vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9 CVE-2025-30033.",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Siemens",
"scada": true
}
}
},
{
"description": "SIMATIC S7-1500 Software Controller V3 toutes versions pour la vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9 CVE-2025-30033",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Siemens",
"scada": true
}
}
},
{
"description": "SIMATIC STEP 7 CFC V20 toutes versions. L\u0027\u00e9diteur indique que le produit ne b\u00e9n\u00e9ficiera pas de correctif de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 pour la vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9 CVE-2025-30033.",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Siemens",
"scada": true
}
}
},
{
"description": "SIMATIC NET PC Software toutes versions pour la vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9 CVE-2025-30033",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Siemens",
"scada": true
}
}
},
{
"description": "SIMATIC Route Control V9.1 toutes versions pour la vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9 CVE-2025-30033",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Siemens",
"scada": true
}
}
},
{
"description": "SIMATIC Process Historian 2022 toutes versions pour la vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9 CVE-2025-30033",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Siemens",
"scada": true
}
}
},
{
"description": "SIMATIC WinCC OA V3.20 versions ant\u00e9rieures \u00e0 V3.20 P008",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Siemens",
"scada": true
}
}
},
{
"description": "SIMATIC RTLS Locating Manager versions ant\u00e9rieures \u00e0 3.3",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Siemens",
"scada": true
}
}
},
{
"description": "Siprotec 4 7SA6, 7SD5 et 7SD610 versions ant\u00e9rieures \u00e0 4.78",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Siemens",
"scada": true
}
}
},
{
"description": "SIMATIC Automation Tool toutes versions pour la vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9 CVE-2025-30033",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Siemens",
"scada": true
}
}
},
{
"description": "TIA Portal Cloud V18 toutes versions pour les vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9s CVE-2024-54678 et CVE-2025-40759",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Siemens",
"scada": true
}
}
},
{
"description": "SIMATIC PDM V9.2 et V9.3 toutes versions pour la vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9 CVE-2025-30033",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Siemens",
"scada": true
}
}
},
{
"description": "SIMATIC WinCC Runtime Professional toutes versions pour la vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9 CVE-2025-30033",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Siemens",
"scada": true
}
}
},
{
"description": "SIMATIC WinCC Visualization Architect (SiVArc) toutes versions pour la vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9 CVE-2025-30033",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Siemens",
"scada": true
}
}
},
{
"description": "SIMATIC eaSie Workflow Skills toutes versions pour la vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9 CVE-2025-30033",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Siemens",
"scada": true
}
}
},
{
"description": "SIMATIC STEP 7 CFC V19 toutes versions. L\u0027\u00e9diteur indique que le produit ne b\u00e9n\u00e9ficiera pas de correctif de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 pour la vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9 CVE-2025-30033.",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Siemens",
"scada": true
}
}
},
{
"description": "SIMATIC WinCC V19 versions ant\u00e9rieures \u00e0 V19 Update 4",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Siemens",
"scada": true
}
}
},
{
"description": "SIMATIC Management Agent toutes versions pour la vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9 CVE-2025-30033",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Siemens",
"scada": true
}
}
},
{
"description": "SIMATIC WinCC V7.5 et V8.0 toutes versions pour la vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9 CVE-2025-30033",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Siemens",
"scada": true
}
}
},
{
"description": "SIMATIC STEP 7 V5.7 toutes versions pour la vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9 CVE-2025-30033",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Siemens",
"scada": true
}
}
},
{
"description": "SIMATIC Automation Tool SDK Windows toutes versions pour la vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9 CVE-2025-30033",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Siemens",
"scada": true
}
}
},
{
"description": "SIMATIC Process Historian 2022 toutes versions pour la vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9 CVE-2025-47809",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Siemens",
"scada": true
}
}
},
{
"description": "SIMATIC S7-PLCSIM V20 versions ant\u00e9rieures \u00e0 V20 Update 1",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Siemens",
"scada": true
}
}
},
{
"description": "TIA Portal Cloud V17 toutes versions pour les vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9s CVE-2024-54678 et CVE-2025-40759",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Siemens",
"scada": true
}
}
},
{
"description": "SIMATIC Energy Suite toutes versions pour la vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9 CVE-2025-30033",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Siemens",
"scada": true
}
}
},
{
"description": "SIMATIC PCS 7 toutes versions pour la vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9 CVE-2025-30033",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Siemens",
"scada": true
}
}
},
{
"description": "SIMATIC Process Historian 2024 toutes versions pour la vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9 CVE-2025-30033",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Siemens",
"scada": true
}
}
},
{
"description": "SIMATIC STEP 7 V19 versions ant\u00e9rieures \u00e0 V19 Update 4",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Siemens",
"scada": true
}
}
},
{
"description": "TIA Portal Test Suite V17, v18, v19 et v20 toutes versions pour la vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9 CVE-2025-30033",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Siemens",
"scada": true
}
}
},
{
"description": "SIMATIC S7-PCT toutes versions pour la vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9 CVE-2025-30033",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Siemens",
"scada": true
}
}
},
{
"description": "SIMATIC Target toutes versions pour la vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9 CVE-2025-30033",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Siemens",
"scada": true
}
}
},
{
"description": "SIMATIC ProSave V18 toutes versions. L\u0027\u00e9diteur indique que le produit ne b\u00e9n\u00e9ficiera pas de correctif de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 pour la vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9 CVE-2025-30033.",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Siemens",
"scada": true
}
}
},
{
"description": "SIMATIC Logon V1.6 toutes versions. L\u0027\u00e9diteur indique que le produit ne b\u00e9n\u00e9ficiera pas de correctif de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 pour la vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9 CVE-2025-30033.",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Siemens",
"scada": true
}
}
},
{
"description": "SIMATIC STEP 7 V17 et V18 toutes versions pour les vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9s CVE-2024-54678 et CVE-2025-40759",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Siemens",
"scada": true
}
}
},
{
"description": "SIMATIC RTLS Locating Manager versions ant\u00e9rieures \u00e0 3.2",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Siemens",
"scada": true
}
}
},
{
"description": "SIMATIC S7-PLCSIM Advanced versions ant\u00e9rieures \u00e0 V7.0 Update 1",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Siemens",
"scada": true
}
}
},
{
"description": "SIMATIC PCS neo V5.0 toutes versions pour la vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9 CVE-2024-54678",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Siemens",
"scada": true
}
}
},
{
"description": "SIMATIC STEP 7 V20 toutes versions pour les vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9s CVE-2024-54678 et CVE-2025-40759",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Siemens",
"scada": true
}
}
},
{
"description": "TIA Portal Cloud V20 toutes versions pour les vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9s CVE-2024-54678 et CVE-2025-40759",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Siemens",
"scada": true
}
}
},
{
"description": "Siprotec 4 toutes versions et tous mod\u00e8les except\u00e9s 7SA6, 7SD5, 7SD610 pour la vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9 CVE-2024-52504. ",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Siemens",
"scada": true
}
}
},
{
"description": "SIMATIC eaSie PCS 7 Skill Package (6DL5424-0BX00-0AV8) toutes versions pour la vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9 CVE-2025-30033",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Siemens",
"scada": true
}
}
},
{
"description": "SCALANCE XC-300/XR-300/XC-400/XR-500WG/XR-500 versions ant\u00e9rieures \u00e0 3.2",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Siemens",
"scada": true
}
}
},
{
"description": "SIMATIC S7-PLCSIM V17, V18 et V19 toutes versions pour la vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9 CVE-2025-30033",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Siemens",
"scada": true
}
}
},
{
"description": "SIMATIC WinCC Unified PC Runtime V18, V19 et V20 toutes versions pour la vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9 CVE-2025-30033",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Siemens",
"scada": true
}
}
},
{
"description": "SIMATIC PCS 7 Advanced Process Faceplates V9.1 toutes versions pour la vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9 CVE-2025-30033",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Siemens",
"scada": true
}
}
},
{
"description": "SIMATIC S7 F Systems V6.4 toutes versions pour la vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9 CVE-2025-30033",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Siemens",
"scada": true
}
}
},
{
"description": "SIMATIC Information Server toutes versions pour la vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9 CVE-2025-47809",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Siemens",
"scada": true
}
}
},
{
"description": "SIMATIC S7 F Systems V6.3 toutes versions. L\u0027\u00e9diteur indique que le produit ne b\u00e9n\u00e9ficiera pas de correctif de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 pour la vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9 CVE-2025-30033.",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Siemens",
"scada": true
}
}
},
{
"description": "SIMATIC ProSave V20 toutes versions pour la vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9 CVE-2025-30033",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Siemens",
"scada": true
}
}
},
{
"description": "SIMATIC PCS 7 Logic Matrix V9.1 toutes versions pour la vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9 CVE-2025-30033",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Siemens",
"scada": true
}
}
},
{
"description": "WinCC Panel Image Setup toutes versions pour la vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9 CVE-2025-30033",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Siemens",
"scada": true
}
}
},
{
"description": "SIMATIC PCS neo V4.1 et V5.0 toutes versions. L\u0027\u00e9diteur indique que le produit ne b\u00e9n\u00e9ficiera pas de correctif de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 pour la vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9 CVE-2024-54678.",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Siemens",
"scada": true
}
}
},
{
"description": "SIMATIC Route Control V10.0 toutes versions pour la vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9 CVE-2025-30033",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Siemens",
"scada": true
}
}
},
{
"description": "SIMATIC WinCC V8.1 versions ant\u00e9rieures \u00e0 V8.1 Update 3",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Siemens",
"scada": true
}
}
}
],
"affected_systems_content": "",
"content": "## Solutions\n\nSe r\u00e9f\u00e9rer au bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 de l\u0027\u00e9diteur pour l\u0027obtention des correctifs (cf. section Documentation).",
"cves": [
{
"name": "CVE-2021-44879",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-44879"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-3567",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-3567"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-5178",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-5178"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-5678",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-5678"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-5717",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-5717"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-39198",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-39198"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-45863",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-45863"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-6931",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-6931"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-6606",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-6606"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-6121",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-6121"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-51779",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-51779"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-6932",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-6932"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-0193",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-0193"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-6040",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-6040"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-46343",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-46343"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-35827",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-35827"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-0646",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-0646"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-51782",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-51782"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-51781",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-51781"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-51780",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-51780"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-1086",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-1086"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26600",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26600"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52597",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52597"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26598",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26598"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52598",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52598"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52601",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52601"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52600",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52600"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52602",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52602"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26625",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26625"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26581",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26581"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52606",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52606"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52604",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52604"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52587",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52587"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52599",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52599"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52583",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52583"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52603",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52603"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52607",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52607"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52594",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52594"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52595",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52595"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26602",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26602"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52340",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52340"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52475",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52475"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52478",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52478"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52502",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52502"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26593",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26593"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-0584",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-0584"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52435",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52435"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52617",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52617"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26645",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26645"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-0841",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-0841"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52477",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52477"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52504",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52504"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52615",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52615"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52486",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52486"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52509",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52509"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52637",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52637"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52507",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52507"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26664",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26664"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52623",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52623"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52619",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52619"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52510",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52510"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26754",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26754"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26697",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26697"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26704",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26704"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26720",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26720"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52622",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52622"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26671",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26671"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26748",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26748"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26606",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26606"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26702",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26702"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26766",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26766"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26685",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26685"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26801",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26801"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26663",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26663"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26675",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26675"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26752",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26752"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26805",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26805"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26773",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26773"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26793",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26793"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26764",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26764"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26735",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26735"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26684",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26684"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26679",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26679"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26749",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26749"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26688",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26688"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26763",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26763"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26722",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26722"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26777",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26777"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26779",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26779"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26772",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26772"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26791",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26791"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26788",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26788"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26804",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26804"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26696",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26696"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26778",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26778"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26790",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26790"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26673",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26673"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26751",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26751"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26736",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26736"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52581",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52581"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26839",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26839"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26845",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26845"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26840",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26840"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26910",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26910"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26615",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26615"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26635",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26635"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26835",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26835"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26636",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26636"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26825",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26825"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52433",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52433"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52654",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52654"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52655",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52655"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52753",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52753"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52764",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52764"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52774",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52774"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52789",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52789"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52791",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52791"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52796",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52796"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52799",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52799"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52804",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52804"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52805",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52805"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52806",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52806"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52809",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52809"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52810",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52810"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52817",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52817"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52818",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52818"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52819",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52819"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52832",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52832"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52838",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52838"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52840",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52840"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52847",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52847"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52853",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52853"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52855",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52855"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52858",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52858"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52864",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52864"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52865",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52865"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52867",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52867"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52868",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52868"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52871",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52871"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52873",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52873"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52875",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52875"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52876",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52876"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27405",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27405"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27410",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27410"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27412",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27412"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27413",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27413"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27416",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27416"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27417",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27417"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35833",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35833"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36938",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36938"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52670",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52670"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35835",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35835"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36894",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36894"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27414",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27414"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52813",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52813"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52835",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52835"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52881",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52881"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52784",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52784"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52843",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52843"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52845",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52845"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36978",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36978"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-37078",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-37078"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38619",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38619"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39468",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39468"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39469",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39469"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38586",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38586"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36974",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36974"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39476",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39476"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39482",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39482"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39484",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39484"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39487",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39487"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39495",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39495"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39499",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39499"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39501",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39501"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39502",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39502"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39503",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39503"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39505",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39505"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39506",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39506"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39509",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39509"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40901",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40901"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40902",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40902"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40904",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40904"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40905",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40905"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40912",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40912"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40916",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40916"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40929",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40929"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40931",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40931"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40932",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40932"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40934",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40934"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40941",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40941"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40942",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40942"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40943",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40943"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40945",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40945"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40947",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40947"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40958",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40958"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40959",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40959"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40960",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40960"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40961",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40961"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40963",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40963"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40968",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40968"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40971",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40971"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40974",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40974"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40976",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40976"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40978",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40978"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40980",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40980"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40981",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40981"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40983",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40983"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40984",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40984"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40987",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40987"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40988",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40988"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40990",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40990"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40995",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40995"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41000",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41000"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41004",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41004"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41005",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41005"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41006",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41006"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52836",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52836"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52879",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52879"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36901",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36901"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41017",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41017"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41090",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41090"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41091",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41091"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48827",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48827"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48828",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48828"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48829",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48829"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41009",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41009"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41012",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41012"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41015",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41015"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41040",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41040"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41041",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41041"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41044",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41044"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41059",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41059"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41063",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41063"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41064",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41064"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41070",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41070"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41072",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41072"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41078",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41078"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41081",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41081"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41087",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41087"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41089",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41089"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41095",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41095"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42093",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42093"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42105",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42105"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42145",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42145"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42161",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42161"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42223",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42223"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42224",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42224"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48666",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48666"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36484",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36484"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41007",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41007"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41020",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41020"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41022",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41022"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41034",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41034"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41035",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41035"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41046",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41046"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41049",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41049"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41055",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41055"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41065",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41065"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41068",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41068"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41077",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41077"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42101",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42101"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42143",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42143"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42148",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42148"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42152",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42152"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42153",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42153"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42154",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42154"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42229",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42229"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42232",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42232"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42236",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42236"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42244",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42244"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42247",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42247"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42082",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42082"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52887",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52887"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41092",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41092"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41097",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41097"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42076",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42076"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42077",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42077"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42084",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42084"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42086",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42086"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42087",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42087"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42092",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42092"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42094",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42094"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42095",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42095"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48935",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48935"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-43861",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43861"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-43867",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43867"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-43871",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43871"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-43879",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43879"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-43880",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43880"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-43882",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43882"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-43883",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43883"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-43889",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43889"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-43893",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43893"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-43894",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43894"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-43907",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43907"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-43908",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43908"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-45003",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-45003"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-44987",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-44987"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-44988",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-44988"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-44989",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-44989"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-44990",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-44990"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-44995",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-44995"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-44998",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-44998"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-44999",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-44999"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-45006",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-45006"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-45008",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-45008"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-45021",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-45021"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-45025",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-45025"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46673",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46673"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46674",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46674"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46675",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46675"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46676",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46676"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46677",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46677"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46679",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46679"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46685",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46685"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46689",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46689"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46702",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46702"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46707",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46707"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46713",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46713"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46714",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46714"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46719",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46719"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46721",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46721"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46722",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46722"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46723",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46723"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46724",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46724"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46725",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46725"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46731",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46731"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46737",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46737"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46738",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46738"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46739",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46739"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46740",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46740"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46743",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46743"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46744",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46744"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46745",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46745"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46747",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46747"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46750",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46750"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46755",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46755"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46756",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46756"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46757",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46757"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46758",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46758"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46759",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46759"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46761",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46761"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46763",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46763"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46771",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46771"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46777",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46777"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46780",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46780"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46781",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46781"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46782",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46782"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46783",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46783"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46791",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46791"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46798",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46798"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46800",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46800"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46804",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46804"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46814",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46814"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46815",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46815"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46817",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46817"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46818",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46818"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46819",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46819"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46822",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46822"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46828",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46828"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46829",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46829"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46832",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46832"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46840",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46840"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46844",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46844"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-43890",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43890"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-43914",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43914"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-44935",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-44935"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-44944",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-44944"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-44952",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-44952"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-44954",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-44954"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-44960",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-44960"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-44965",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-44965"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-44969",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-44969"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-44971",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-44971"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-47668",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47668"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-47659",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47659"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-47663",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47663"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-47667",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47667"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-47669",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47669"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-9681",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-9681"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52917",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52917"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52919",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52919"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-47660",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47660"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-47684",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47684"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-47685",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47685"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-47692",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47692"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-47696",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47696"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-47697",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47697"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-47698",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47698"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-47699",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47699"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-47705",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47705"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-47706",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47706"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-47709",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47709"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-47710",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47710"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-47712",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47712"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-47713",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47713"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-47718",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47718"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-47723",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47723"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-47735",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47735"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-47737",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47737"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-47739",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47739"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-47742",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47742"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-47747",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47747"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-47748",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47748"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-47749",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47749"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-47756",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47756"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-47757",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47757"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49851",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49851"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49858",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49858"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49860",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49860"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49863",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49863"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49867",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49867"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49875",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49875"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49877",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49877"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49878",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49878"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49879",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49879"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49881",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49881"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49882",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49882"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49883",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49883"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49890",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49890"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49892",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49892"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49894",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49894"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49895",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49895"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49896",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49896"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49900",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49900"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49901",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49901"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49902",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49902"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49903",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49903"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49907",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49907"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49913",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49913"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49930",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49930"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49933",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49933"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49936",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49936"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49938",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49938"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49949",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49949"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49955",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49955"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49957",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49957"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49958",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49958"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49959",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49959"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49962",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49962"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49963",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49963"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49965",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49965"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49966",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49966"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49967",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49967"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49969",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49969"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49973",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49973"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49975",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49975"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49981",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49981"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49982",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49982"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49985",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49985"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49993",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49993"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49995",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49995"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50001",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50001"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50006",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50006"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50007",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50007"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50008",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50008"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50013",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50013"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50015",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50015"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50024",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50024"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50033",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50033"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50035",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50035"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50040",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50040"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50044",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50044"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50045",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50045"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50046",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50046"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50049",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50049"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50059",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50059"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50074",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50074"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-44949",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-44949"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50218",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50218"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50234",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50234"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50236",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50236"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50237",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50237"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50251",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50251"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50262",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50262"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50264",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50264"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50265",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50265"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50267",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50267"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50268",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50268"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50269",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50269"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50273",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50273"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50278",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50278"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50279",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50279"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50282",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50282"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50287",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50287"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50290",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50290"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50292",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50292"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50295",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50295"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50296",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50296"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50299",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50299"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50301",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50301"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50302",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50302"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53052",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53052"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53057",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53057"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53059",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53059"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53060",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53060"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53061",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53061"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53063",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53063"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53066",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53066"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50082",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50082"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50099",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50099"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53241",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53241"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53240",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53240"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-47679",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47679"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-47701",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47701"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-47740",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47740"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49868",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49868"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49884",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49884"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49889",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49889"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49924",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49924"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49944",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49944"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49948",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49948"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49952",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49952"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49977",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49977"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49983",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49983"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49997",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49997"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50039",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50039"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50095",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50095"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50096",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50096"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50179",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50179"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50180",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50180"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50181",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50181"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50184",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50184"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50188",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50188"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50089",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50089"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50194",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50194"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50195",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50195"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50198",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50198"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50201",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50201"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53101",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53101"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53104",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53104"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50083",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50083"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50185",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50185"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50193",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50193"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50199",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50199"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50202",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50202"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53097",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53097"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53103",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53103"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53146",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53146"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53148",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53148"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53150",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53150"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53155",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53155"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53156",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53156"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53157",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53157"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53158",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53158"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53161",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53161"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53171",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53171"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53173",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53173"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53174",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53174"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53214",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53214"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53217",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53217"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53237",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53237"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56539",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56539"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56562",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56562"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56567",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56567"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56576",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56576"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56605",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56605"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56645",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56645"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56754",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56754"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56756",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56756"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53239",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53239"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56548",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56548"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56570",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56570"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56571",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56571"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56598",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56598"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56619",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56619"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56704",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56704"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-47143",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47143"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-48881",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-48881"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50051",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50051"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-52332",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-52332"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53172",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53172"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53194",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53194"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53197",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53197"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53198",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53198"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53227",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53227"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56531",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56531"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56532",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56532"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56533",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56533"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56558",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56558"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56568",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56568"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56569",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56569"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56572",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56572"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56574",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56574"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56587",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56587"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56589",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56589"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56593",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56593"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56594",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56594"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56595",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56595"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56596",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56596"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56597",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56597"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56602",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56602"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56603",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56603"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56606",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56606"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56615",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56615"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56623",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56623"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56629",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56629"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56630",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56630"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56634",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56634"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56636",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56636"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56637",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56637"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56642",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56642"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56643",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56643"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56644",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56644"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56648",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56648"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56659",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56659"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56661",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56661"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56662",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56662"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56670",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56670"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56681",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56681"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56688",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56688"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56690",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56690"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56691",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56691"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56698",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56698"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56700",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56700"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56701",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56701"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56705",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56705"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56723",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56723"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56724",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56724"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56739",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56739"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56741",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56741"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56746",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56746"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56747",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56747"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56748",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56748"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56779",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56779"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56780",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56780"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-57874",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57874"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50602",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50602"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50304",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50304"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56600",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56600"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56601",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56601"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56610",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56610"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56650",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56650"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56728",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56728"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56633",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56633"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49034",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49034"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49971",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49971"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53145",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53145"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53165",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53165"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53181",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53181"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53183",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53183"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53184",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53184"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53226",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53226"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56720",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56720"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-43098",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43098"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53680",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53680"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56581",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56581"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56586",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56586"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56770",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56770"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56781",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56781"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56785",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56785"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47316",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47316"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-54678",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-54678"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-30033",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-30033"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-30034",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-30034"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40570",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40570"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40746",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40746"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40751",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40751"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40752",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40752"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40753",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40753"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40759",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40759"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-47809",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-47809"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-52504",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-52504"
}
],
"initial_release_date": "2025-08-12T00:00:00",
"last_revision_date": "2025-08-12T00:00:00",
"links": [],
"reference": "CERTFR-2025-AVI-0677",
"revisions": [
{
"description": "Version initiale",
"revision_date": "2025-08-12T00:00:00.000000"
}
],
"risks": [
{
"description": "D\u00e9ni de service \u00e0 distance"
},
{
"description": "Ex\u00e9cution de code arbitraire \u00e0 distance"
},
{
"description": "Atteinte \u00e0 l\u0027int\u00e9grit\u00e9 des donn\u00e9es"
},
{
"description": "Non sp\u00e9cifi\u00e9 par l\u0027\u00e9diteur"
},
{
"description": "Contournement de la politique de s\u00e9curit\u00e9"
},
{
"description": "Atteinte \u00e0 la confidentialit\u00e9 des donn\u00e9es"
},
{
"description": "\u00c9l\u00e9vation de privil\u00e8ges"
}
],
"summary": "De multiples vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9s ont \u00e9t\u00e9 d\u00e9couvertes dans les produits Siemens. Certaines d\u0027entre elles permettent \u00e0 un attaquant de provoquer une ex\u00e9cution de code arbitraire \u00e0 distance, une \u00e9l\u00e9vation de privil\u00e8ges et un d\u00e9ni de service \u00e0 distance.",
"title": "Multiples vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9s dans les produits Siemens",
"vendor_advisories": [
{
"published_at": "2025-08-12",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 Siemens SSA-707630",
"url": "https://cert-portal.siemens.com/productcert/html/ssa-707630.html"
},
{
"published_at": "2025-08-12",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 Siemens SSA-331739",
"url": "https://cert-portal.siemens.com/productcert/html/ssa-331739.html"
},
{
"published_at": "2025-08-12",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 Siemens SSA-693808",
"url": "https://cert-portal.siemens.com/productcert/html/ssa-693808.html"
},
{
"published_at": "2025-08-12",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 Siemens SSA-613116",
"url": "https://cert-portal.siemens.com/productcert/html/ssa-613116.html"
},
{
"published_at": "2025-08-12",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 Siemens SSA-493396",
"url": "https://cert-portal.siemens.com/productcert/html/ssa-493396.html"
},
{
"published_at": "2025-08-11",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 Siemens ssa-400089",
"url": "https://cert-portal.siemens.com/productcert/html/ssa-400089.html"
},
{
"published_at": "2025-08-12",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 Siemens SSA-493787",
"url": "https://cert-portal.siemens.com/productcert/html/ssa-493787.html"
},
{
"published_at": "2025-08-12",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 Siemens SSA-894058",
"url": "https://cert-portal.siemens.com/productcert/html/ssa-894058.html"
},
{
"published_at": "2025-08-12",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 Siemens SSA-355557",
"url": "https://cert-portal.siemens.com/productcert/html/ssa-355557.html"
},
{
"published_at": "2025-08-12",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 Siemens SSA-529291",
"url": "https://cert-portal.siemens.com/productcert/html/ssa-529291.html"
},
{
"published_at": "2025-08-12",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 Siemens SSA-282044",
"url": "https://cert-portal.siemens.com/productcert/html/ssa-282044.html"
}
]
}
CERTFR-2025-AVI-1057
Vulnerability from certfr_avis - Published: 2025-12-02 - Updated: 2025-12-02
De multiples vulnérabilités ont été découvertes dans les produits VMware. Elles permettent à un attaquant de provoquer un problème de sécurité non spécifié par l'éditeur.
Solutions
Se référer au bulletin de sécurité de l'éditeur pour l'obtention des correctifs (cf. section Documentation).
| Vendor | Product | Description | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| VMware | Tanzu Data Intelligence | Tanzu pour Postgres versions 16.x antérieures à 16.11.0 | ||
| VMware | Tanzu Data Intelligence | Tanzu pour Postgres versions 14.x antérieures à 14.20.0 | ||
| VMware | Tanzu Data Intelligence | Tanzu pour Postgres versions 17.x antérieures à 17.7.0 | ||
| VMware | Tanzu Kubernetes Runtime | Tanzu Hub versions antérieures à 10.3.1 | ||
| VMware | Tanzu Data Intelligence | Tanzu pour Postgres versions 18.x antérieures à 18.1.0 | ||
| VMware | Tanzu Data Intelligence | Tanzu pour Postgres versions 15.x antérieures à 15.15.0 | ||
| VMware | Tanzu Data Intelligence | Tanzu pour Postgres versions 13.x antérieures à 13.23.0 |
| Title | Publication Time | Tags | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
||||||||
{
"$ref": "https://www.cert.ssi.gouv.fr/openapi.json",
"affected_systems": [
{
"description": "Tanzu pour Postgres versions 16.x ant\u00e9rieures \u00e0 16.11.0",
"product": {
"name": "Tanzu Data Intelligence",
"vendor": {
"name": "VMware",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "Tanzu pour Postgres versions 14.x ant\u00e9rieures \u00e0 14.20.0",
"product": {
"name": "Tanzu Data Intelligence",
"vendor": {
"name": "VMware",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "Tanzu pour Postgres versions 17.x ant\u00e9rieures \u00e0 17.7.0",
"product": {
"name": "Tanzu Data Intelligence",
"vendor": {
"name": "VMware",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "Tanzu Hub versions ant\u00e9rieures \u00e0 10.3.1",
"product": {
"name": "Tanzu Kubernetes Runtime",
"vendor": {
"name": "VMware",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "Tanzu pour Postgres versions 18.x ant\u00e9rieures \u00e0 18.1.0",
"product": {
"name": "Tanzu Data Intelligence",
"vendor": {
"name": "VMware",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "Tanzu pour Postgres versions 15.x ant\u00e9rieures \u00e0 15.15.0",
"product": {
"name": "Tanzu Data Intelligence",
"vendor": {
"name": "VMware",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "Tanzu pour Postgres versions 13.x ant\u00e9rieures \u00e0 13.23.0",
"product": {
"name": "Tanzu Data Intelligence",
"vendor": {
"name": "VMware",
"scada": false
}
}
}
],
"affected_systems_content": "",
"content": "## Solutions\n\nSe r\u00e9f\u00e9rer au bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 de l\u0027\u00e9diteur pour l\u0027obtention des correctifs (cf. section Documentation).",
"cves": [
{
"name": "CVE-2019-12900",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2019-12900"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2019-25013",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2019-25013"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2020-28196",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-28196"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2020-10029",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-10029"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2019-18276",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2019-18276"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-3421",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-3421"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-3326",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-3326"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2020-27618",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-27618"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-20227",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-20227"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-36222",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-36222"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-23960",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-23960"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-37967",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-37967"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-3629",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-3629"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-3602",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-3602"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-37434",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-37434"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-2309",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-2309"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-43680",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-43680"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-29824",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-29824"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-23308",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-23308"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-35737",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-35737"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-40303",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-40303"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-40304",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-40304"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-42898",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-42898"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-3633",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-3633"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-3786",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-3786"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-32205",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-32205"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-32206",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-32206"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2018-25032",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2018-25032"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-3996",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-3996"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-3903",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-3903"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-22942",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-22942"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-26878",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-26878"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-20266",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-20266"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-1292",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-1292"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-1974",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-1974"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-3521",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-3521"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-27774",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-27774"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-27775",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-27775"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-22576",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-22576"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-27776",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-27776"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-2068",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-2068"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-2097",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-2097"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-20154",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-20154"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2017-7500",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2017-7500"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-33574",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-33574"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-36690",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-36690"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-37750",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-37750"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-3999",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-3999"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-23218",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-23218"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-23219",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-23219"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-27782",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-27782"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-32208",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-32208"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-27781",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-27781"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-32207",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-32207"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-3358",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-3358"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-1271",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-1271"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-29458",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-29458"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-39537",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-39537"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-32221",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-32221"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-42916",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-42916"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-35252",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-35252"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-42915",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-42915"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-43551",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-43551"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-43552",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-43552"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-4304",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-4304"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-4203",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-4203"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-0286",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-0286"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-0401",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-0401"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-0215",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-0215"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-0217",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-0217"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-0216",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-0216"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-4450",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-4450"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-27672",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-27672"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-0045",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-0045"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-23915",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-23915"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-23914",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-23914"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-23916",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-23916"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-1304",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-1304"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-24329",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-24329"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-1118",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-1118"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-0464",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-0464"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-0466",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-0466"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-0465",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-0465"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-1838",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-1838"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-28410",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-28410"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-29469",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-29469"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-28484",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-28484"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-2650",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-2650"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-27535",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-27535"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-27779",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-27779"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-27533",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-27533"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-27538",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-27538"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-27534",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-27534"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-27536",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-27536"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-27780",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-27780"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-30115",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-30115"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-1380",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-1380"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2020-1752",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-1752"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-35942",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-35942"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-38604",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-38604"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2020-29562",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-29562"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-27645",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-27645"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-3534",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-3534"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-2156",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-2156"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-3006",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-3006"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-1255",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-1255"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-28322",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-28322"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-46908",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-46908"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-31239",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-31239"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-28320",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-28320"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-28321",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-28321"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-2975",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-2975"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-4899",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-4899"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-3446",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-3446"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-28319",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-28319"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-3817",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-3817"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-4387",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-4387"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-38546",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-38546"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-38545",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-38545"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-5363",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-5363"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-4807",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-4807"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-45853",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-45853"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-31085",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-31085"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-5678",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-5678"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-40217",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-40217"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2020-22218",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-22218"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-2603",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-2603"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-2602",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-2602"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-4813",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-4813"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-0563",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-0563"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-4039",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-4039"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-5156",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-5156"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-29491",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-29491"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-39615",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-39615"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-37600",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-37600"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-33294",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-33294"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-43618",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-43618"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-45322",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-45322"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2019-17498",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2019-17498"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2013-4235",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2013-4235"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-29383",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-29383"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-48795",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-48795"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-6237",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-6237"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-36054",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-36054"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-7104",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-7104"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-6129",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-6129"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-46218",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-46218"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-0727",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-0727"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52467",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52467"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52451",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52451"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52445",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52445"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26598",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26598"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52462",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52462"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52469",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52469"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52470",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52470"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52464",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52464"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52475",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52475"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52478",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52478"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26603",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26603"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52452",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52452"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52532",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52532"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2019-25162",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2019-25162"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-46904",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-46904"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-24855",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-24855"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-27043",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-27043"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-36632",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-36632"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-28085",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-28085"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-2511",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-2511"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2020-22916",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-22916"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26631",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26631"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2017-7501",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2017-7501"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-35939",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-35939"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-35938",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-35938"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-35937",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-35937"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-6597",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-6597"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52426",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52426"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52501",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52501"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52519",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52519"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26717",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26717"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26670",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26670"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52477",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52477"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52528",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52528"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52582",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52582"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47098",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47098"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52513",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52513"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-22099",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-22099"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47097",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47097"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52520",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52520"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-7042",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-7042"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52523",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52523"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26803",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26803"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-24858",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-24858"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-24857",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-24857"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26660",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26660"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26760",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26760"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26681",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26681"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26815",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26815"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26621",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26621"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26714",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26714"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26761",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26761"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26742",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26742"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47020",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47020"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47017",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47017"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-46984",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-46984"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47071",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47071"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47202",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47202"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26605",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26605"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26989",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26989"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27003",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27003"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26987",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26987"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27015",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27015"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27014",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27014"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26992",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26992"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52468",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52468"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52487",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52487"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26618",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26618"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52490",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52490"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52455",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52455"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52472",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52472"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52643",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52643"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26649",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26649"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52473",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52473"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52465",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52465"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2007-4559",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2007-4559"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52425",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52425"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-4603",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-4603"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27042",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27042"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47197",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47197"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47196",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47196"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48702",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48702"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48701",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48701"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48694",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48694"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48644",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48644"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47217",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47217"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48653",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48653"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47214",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47214"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48672",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48672"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48657",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48657"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48652",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48652"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48658",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48658"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47210",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47210"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48662",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48662"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48639",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48639"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52646",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52646"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48640",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48640"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26933",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26933"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47215",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47215"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47074",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47074"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47041",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47041"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27039",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27039"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48704",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48704"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48675",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48675"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48690",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48690"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47191",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47191"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48637",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48637"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48632",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48632"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48660",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48660"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-4741",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-4741"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-9231",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-9231"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52565",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52565"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26892",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26892"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26964",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26964"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-9230",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-9230"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-9232",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-9232"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47227",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47227"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47237",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47237"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47239",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47239"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47250",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47250"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47261",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47261"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47343",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47343"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47360",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47360"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47365",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47365"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47373",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47373"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47393",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47393"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47398",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47398"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47404",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47404"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47420",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47420"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47422",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47422"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47426",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47426"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47428",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47428"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47429",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47429"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47430",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47430"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47438",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47438"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47444",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47444"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47454",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47454"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47457",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47457"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47465",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47465"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47481",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47481"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47483",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47483"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47490",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47490"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47495",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47495"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47497",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47497"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47499",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47499"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47500",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47500"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47505",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47505"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47516",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47516"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47527",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47527"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47536",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47536"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47537",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47537"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47538",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47538"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47550",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47550"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47559",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47559"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48689",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48689"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48691",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48691"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48705",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48705"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48709",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48709"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48710",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48710"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52654",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52654"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52659",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52659"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52661",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52661"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52662",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52662"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52679",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52679"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52686",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52686"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52690",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52690"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52698",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52698"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52702",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52702"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52703",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52703"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52730",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52730"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52731",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52731"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52736",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52736"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52739",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52739"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52740",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52740"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52743",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52743"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52744",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52744"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52747",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52747"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52764",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52764"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52781",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52781"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52788",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52788"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52791",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52791"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52795",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52795"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52796",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52796"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52803",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52803"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52806",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52806"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52814",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52814"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52817",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52817"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52818",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52818"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52833",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52833"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52840",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52840"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52851",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52851"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52854",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52854"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52867",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52867"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52877",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52877"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26838",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26838"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35801",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35801"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35804",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35804"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35860",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35860"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35872",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35872"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35901",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35901"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35912",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35912"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35952",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35952"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35959",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35959"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35963",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35963"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35964",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35964"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36012",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36012"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36906",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36906"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36918",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36918"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36926",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36926"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-28757",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-28757"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-5535",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-5535"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52663",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52663"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52675",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52675"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52697",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52697"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26611",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26611"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26674",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26674"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26899",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26899"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26990",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26990"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27027",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27027"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27031",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27031"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27057",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27057"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35795",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35795"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35810",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35810"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35814",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35814"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35824",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35824"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35834",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35834"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35836",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35836"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35838",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35838"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35891",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35891"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35903",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35903"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35917",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35917"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35927",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35927"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35974",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35974"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35981",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35981"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35991",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35991"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36002",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36002"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36011",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36011"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36021",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36021"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36891",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36891"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36930",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36930"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36936",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36936"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35983",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35983"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-2398",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-2398"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-0397",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-0397"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-4030",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-4030"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-4032",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-4032"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52648",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52648"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52649",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52649"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26953",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26953"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26975",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26975"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27026",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27026"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27079",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27079"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27390",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27390"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35787",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35787"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35827",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35827"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35831",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35831"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-3596",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-3596"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52560",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52560"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52813",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52813"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52835",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52835"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52881",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52881"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-0450",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-0450"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-25062",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-25062"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26458",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26458"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26461",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26461"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47539",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47539"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47572",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47572"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47576",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47576"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47578",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47578"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47601",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47601"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47607",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47607"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47609",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47609"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47616",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47616"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47617",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47617"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47620",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47620"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48712",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48712"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48713",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48713"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48714",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48714"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48720",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48720"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48724",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48724"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48725",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48725"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48727",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48727"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48728",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48728"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48729",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48729"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48732",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48732"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48745",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48745"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48746",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48746"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48752",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48752"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48760",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48760"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48763",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48763"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48767",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48767"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48768",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48768"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48769",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48769"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48770",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48770"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52787",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52787"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52837",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52837"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52845",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52845"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52846",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52846"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35979",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35979"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36477",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36477"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36937",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36937"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36945",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36945"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36967",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36967"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36975",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36975"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-4641",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-4641"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-50495",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-50495"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-24859",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-24859"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26734",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26734"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26818",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26818"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26831",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26831"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27012",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27012"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27017",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27017"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35880",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35880"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35892",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35892"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35894",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35894"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35908",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35908"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35913",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35913"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35942",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35942"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35957",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35957"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35980",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35980"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39298",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39298"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39493",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39493"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39500",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39500"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40900",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40900"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40903",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40903"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40908",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40908"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40913",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40913"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40919",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40919"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40924",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40924"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40937",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40937"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40940",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40940"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40948",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40948"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40956",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40956"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40989",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40989"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40994",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40994"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52750",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52750"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52782",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52782"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52786",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52786"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52792",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52792"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52794",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52794"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52842",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52842"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52849",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52849"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52866",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52866"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36010",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36010"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36882",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36882"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36962",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36962"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36977",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36977"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38566",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38566"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38629",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38629"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39291",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39291"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-6923",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-6923"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-3219",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-3219"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36028",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36028"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36884",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36884"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36920",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36920"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36932",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36932"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36956",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36956"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36961",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36961"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38561",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38561"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38604",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38604"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38606",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38606"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47579",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47579"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48757",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48757"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52775",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52775"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52885",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52885"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26837",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26837"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27404",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27404"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39479",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39479"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39498",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39498"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40923",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40923"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40925",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40925"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-6197",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-6197"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47623",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47623"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48773",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48773"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48778",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48778"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48780",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48780"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48783",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48783"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48784",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48784"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48785",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48785"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48786",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48786"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48787",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48787"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48793",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48793"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48796",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48796"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48797",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48797"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48799",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48799"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48800",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48800"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48801",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48801"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48802",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48802"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48804",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48804"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48806",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48806"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48809",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48809"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48810",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48810"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48812",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48812"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-58056",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-58056"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-58057",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-58057"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-10966",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-10966"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-59425",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-59425"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48813",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48813"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48815",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48815"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48817",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48817"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48818",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48818"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48823",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48823"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48825",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48825"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48830",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48830"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48831",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48831"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48834",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48834"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48835",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48835"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48836",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48836"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48837",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48837"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48839",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48839"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48840",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48840"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48843",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48843"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48850",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48850"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48853",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48853"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48858",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48858"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48861",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48861"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48863",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48863"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48864",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48864"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48866",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48866"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52886",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52886"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41057",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41057"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41058",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41058"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-6232",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-6232"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-12817",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-12817"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-12818",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-12818"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-6119",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-6119"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2019-14844",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2019-14844"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-24031",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-24031"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-24032",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-24032"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-44964",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-44964"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-28805",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-28805"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-33099",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-33099"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-0306",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-0306"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-52099",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-52099"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-53643",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-53643"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-59375",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-59375"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-6141",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-6141"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-7709",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-7709"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-9714",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-9714"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-45491",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-45491"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-45492",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-45492"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38632",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38632"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39491",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39491"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40922",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40922"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40930",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40930"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40964",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40964"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40992",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40992"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41003",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41003"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41047",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41047"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42085",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42085"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42109",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42109"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42240",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42240"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47517",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47517"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48865",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48865"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48875",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48875"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48883",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48883"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48886",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48886"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48889",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48889"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48890",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48890"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48896",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48896"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48899",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48899"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48912",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48912"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48913",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48913"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48914",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48914"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48915",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48915"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48921",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48921"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48929",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48929"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48931",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48931"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48934",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48934"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48938",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48938"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48939",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48939"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48942",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48942"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52859",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52859"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52898",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52898"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52901",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52901"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52905",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52905"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52906",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52906"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52908",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52908"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52909",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52909"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52910",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52910"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26637",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26637"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26682",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26682"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26683",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26683"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36970",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36970"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39486",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39486"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41010",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41010"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41032",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41032"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41037",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41037"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41038",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41038"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41039",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41039"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41045",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41045"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41056",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41056"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41084",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41084"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41094",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41094"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42107",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42107"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42125",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42125"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42132",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42132"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42133",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42133"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42138",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42138"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42139",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42139"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42141",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42141"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42238",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42238"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42239",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42239"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42241",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42241"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42245",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42245"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42268",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42268"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42278",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42278"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42291",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42291"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42315",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42315"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42316",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42316"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-43816",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43816"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-43817",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43817"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-43821",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43821"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-43826",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43826"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-43840",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43840"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-43842",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43842"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-43873",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43873"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-43874",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43874"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-7264",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-7264"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41031",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41031"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42243",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42243"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-34459",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-34459"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-8096",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-8096"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-44983",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-44983"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-44986",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-44986"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-45000",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-45000"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-45010",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-45010"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-45019",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-45019"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-45022",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-45022"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-45029",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-45029"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46711",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46711"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46784",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46784"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46830",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46830"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48944",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48944"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42294",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42294"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-43870",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43870"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-44967",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-44967"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-44984",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-44984"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-45001",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-45001"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-45005",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-45005"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-45012",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-45012"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-45013",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-45013"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-45017",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-45017"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-45020",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-45020"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46672",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46672"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46692",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46692"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46706",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46706"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46709",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46709"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46710",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46710"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46767",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46767"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46786",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46786"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46797",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46797"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-37370",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-37370"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-37371",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-37371"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-9143",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-9143"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41085",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41085"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26721",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26721"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42258",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42258"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-45490",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-45490"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-7592",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-7592"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-8088",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-8088"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-54121",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-54121"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2012-2114",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2012-2114"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-46937",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-46937"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-46999",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-46999"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47033",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47033"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47079",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47079"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47092",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47092"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47226",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47226"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47251",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47251"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47266",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47266"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47318",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47318"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47325",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47325"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47346",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47346"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47349",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47349"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47519",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47519"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47561",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47561"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47613",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47613"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-1247",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-1247"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-20153",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-20153"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48641",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48641"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48643",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48643"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48707",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48707"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48719",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48719"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48781",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48781"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48819",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48819"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48832",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48832"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48848",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48848"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48876",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48876"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48963",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48963"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48974",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48974"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48976",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48976"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48984",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48984"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48986",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48986"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49013",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49013"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49018",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49018"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49048",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49048"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49049",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49049"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49052",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49052"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49072",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49072"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49077",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49077"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49094",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49094"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49152",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49152"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49198",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49198"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49229",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49229"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49231",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49231"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49334",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49334"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49340",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49340"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49374",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49374"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49401",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49401"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49403",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49403"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49450",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49450"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49554",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49554"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49557",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49557"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49567",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49567"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49571",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49571"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49572",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49572"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49573",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49573"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49574",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49574"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49575",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49575"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49577",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49577"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49580",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49580"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49585",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49585"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49586",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49586"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49587",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49587"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49593",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49593"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49594",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49594"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49595",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49595"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49596",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49596"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49597",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49597"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49598",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49598"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49599",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49599"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49600",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49600"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49601",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49601"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49602",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49602"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49604",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49604"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49612",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49612"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49629",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49629"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49633",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49633"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49637",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49637"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49639",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49639"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49659",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49659"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49662",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49662"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49691",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49691"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49744",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49744"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49747",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49747"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49752",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49752"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49754",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49754"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49760",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49760"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-31082",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-31082"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52516",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52516"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52568",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52568"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52570",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52570"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52689",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52689"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52704",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52704"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52706",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52706"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52828",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52828"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52902",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52902"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52932",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52932"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52934",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52934"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52940",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52940"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52942",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52942"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52977",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52977"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52985",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52985"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52987",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52987"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52991",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52991"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53004",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53004"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53017",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53017"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-23196",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-23196"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26678",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26678"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26725",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26725"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26746",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26746"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26918",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26918"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27023",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27023"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40907",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40907"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-43896",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43896"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46748",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46748"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46862",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46862"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53073",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53073"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53225",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53225"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56668",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56668"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-57852",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57852"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-57914",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57914"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-57985",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57985"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-57989",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57989"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-58064",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-58064"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-58075",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-58075"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-58084",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-58084"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21709",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21709"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21807",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21807"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21817",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21817"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21827",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21827"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21851",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21851"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21874",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21874"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21907",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21907"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21921",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21921"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-24357",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-24357"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-25183",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-25183"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-29770",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-29770"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-30165",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-30165"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-30202",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-30202"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-32381",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-32381"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-32444",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-32444"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-46570",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-46570"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-47277",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-47277"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-48887",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-48887"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-48956",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-48956"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-57809",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-57809"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-62372",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-62372"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-62426",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-62426"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-65106",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-65106"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-9681",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-9681"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-11168",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-11168"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48879",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48879"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48946",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48946"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48951",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48951"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48953",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48953"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48969",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48969"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48971",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48971"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48972",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48972"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48978",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48978"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48981",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48981"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48985",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48985"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48987",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48987"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48988",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48988"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48992",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48992"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48994",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48994"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48997",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48997"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49005",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49005"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49006",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49006"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49011",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49011"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49012",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49012"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49014",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49014"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49015",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49015"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49017",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49017"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49021",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49021"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49022",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49022"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49024",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49024"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49027",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49027"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49028",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49028"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49029",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49029"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-44932",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-44932"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-44964",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-44964"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46766",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46766"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46825",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46825"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46864",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46864"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-43869",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43869"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-47672",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47672"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-47675",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47675"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-47682",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47682"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-47687",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47687"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-47696",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47696"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-47702",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47702"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-47715",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47715"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-47719",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47719"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-47727",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47727"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49855",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49855"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49862",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49862"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49864",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49864"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49866",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49866"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49870",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49870"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49886",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49886"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49946",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49946"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49953",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49953"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50000",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50000"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50019",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50019"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50020",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50020"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50021",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50021"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50022",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50022"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50023",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50023"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50027",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50027"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50041",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50041"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50042",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50042"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50060",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50060"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50064",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50064"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50074",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50074"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50075",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50075"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50076",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50076"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50077",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50077"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50078",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50078"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50081",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50081"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46824",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46824"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50126",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50126"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50215",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50215"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50235",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50235"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50250",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50250"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50252",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50252"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50255",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50255"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50259",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50259"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50261",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50261"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50271",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50271"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53042",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53042"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53055",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53055"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53070",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53070"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53072",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53072"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53082",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53082"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50226",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50226"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-11053",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-11053"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-44994",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-44994"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50110",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50110"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42317",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42317"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-43820",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43820"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-43888",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43888"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-43910",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43910"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-44975",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-44975"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-44996",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-44996"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-45027",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-45027"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46697",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46697"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46698",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46698"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46788",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46788"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46793",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46793"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46845",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46845"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-47734",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47734"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49856",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49856"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49977",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49977"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50093",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50093"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50186",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50186"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50189",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50189"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48982",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48982"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48983",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48983"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48989",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48989"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52778",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52778"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49976",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49976"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50101",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50101"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50102",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50102"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50121",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50121"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50124",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50124"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50125",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50125"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50128",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50128"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50136",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50136"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50139",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50139"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50141",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50141"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50145",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50145"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50146",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50146"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50147",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50147"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50153",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50153"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50155",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50155"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50157",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50157"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50158",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50158"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50160",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50160"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50169",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50169"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50172",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50172"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50182",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50182"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50200",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50200"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50216",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50216"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50274",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50274"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50275",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50275"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53045",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53045"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53048",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53048"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53074",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53074"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53085",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53085"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53110",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53110"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50162",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50162"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50163",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50163"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53097",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53097"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53113",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53113"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53120",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53120"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53123",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53123"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53136",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53136"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53064",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53064"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53105",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53105"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53117",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53117"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53118",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53118"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53134",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53134"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53151",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53151"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53160",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53160"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53166",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53166"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53169",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53169"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53202",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53202"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53206",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53206"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53207",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53207"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53208",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53208"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53213",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53213"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53215",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53215"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53222",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53222"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53229",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53229"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56549",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56549"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56667",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56667"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56752",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56752"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-48873",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-48873"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49951",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49951"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53091",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53091"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53170",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53170"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53175",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53175"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53185",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53185"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53230",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53230"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53231",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53231"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53232",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53232"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53236",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53236"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-55881",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-55881"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56372",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56372"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-0938",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-0938"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53238",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53238"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56617",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56617"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56625",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56625"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56632",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56632"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56654",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56654"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56663",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56663"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56675",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56675"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56708",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56708"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56709",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56709"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56729",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56729"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56745",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56745"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56760",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56760"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56765",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56765"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-57793",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57793"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-57804",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57804"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-57932",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57932"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-57933",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57933"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-57936",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57936"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21645",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21645"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21649",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21649"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-0167",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-0167"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-0725",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-0725"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46820",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46820"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50602",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50602"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53047",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53047"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56679",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56679"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56707",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56707"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56725",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56725"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56726",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56726"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56727",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56727"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-57882",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57882"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-57917",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57917"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21663",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21663"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21670",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21670"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50164",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50164"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21647",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21647"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21668",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21668"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21671",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21671"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21681",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21681"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-13176",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-13176"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47222",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47222"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47223",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47223"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21673",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21673"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-47700",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47700"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49880",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49880"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49885",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49885"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49999",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49999"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50029",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50029"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50107",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50107"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50109",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50109"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50114",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50114"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50120",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50120"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50152",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50152"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50165",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50165"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50197",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50197"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50207",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50207"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50223",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50223"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50294",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50294"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50303",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50303"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53044",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53044"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53109",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53109"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53167",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53167"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53176",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53176"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53178",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53178"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53189",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53189"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56535",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56535"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56545",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56545"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56696",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56696"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56702",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56702"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56742",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56742"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-1795",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-1795"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56783",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56783"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21694",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21694"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49080",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49080"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49089",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49089"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-57994",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57994"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21705",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21705"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21716",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21716"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21724",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21724"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21725",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21725"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21790",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21790"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21795",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21795"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49043",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49043"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-45336",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-45336"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-45341",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-45341"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-22866",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22866"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47648",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47648"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47649",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47649"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47650",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47650"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47659",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47659"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49058",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49058"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49061",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49061"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49065",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49065"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49066",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49066"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49074",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49074"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49086",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49086"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49090",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49090"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49092",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49092"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49097",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49097"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49100",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49100"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49103",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49103"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49107",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49107"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49118",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49118"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49122",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49122"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49130",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49130"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49145",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49145"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49147",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49147"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49148",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49148"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49153",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49153"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49154",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49154"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49155",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49155"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49156",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49156"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49159",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49159"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49174",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49174"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49175",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49175"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49180",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49180"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49187",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49187"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49188",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49188"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49206",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49206"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49208",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49208"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49216",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49216"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49227",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49227"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49257",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49257"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49259",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49259"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49262",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49262"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49263",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49263"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49264",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49264"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49266",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49266"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49268",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49268"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49269",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49269"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49272",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49272"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49273",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49273"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49279",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49279"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49286",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49286"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49290",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49290"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49297",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49297"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49307",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49307"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49308",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49308"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49321",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49321"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49322",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49322"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49323",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49323"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49339",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49339"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49341",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49341"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49343",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49343"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49345",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49345"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49350",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49350"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49352",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49352"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49356",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49356"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49357",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49357"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49376",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49376"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49378",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49378"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49379",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49379"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49384",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49384"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49394",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49394"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49400",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49400"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49402",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49402"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49404",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49404"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49407",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49407"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49409",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49409"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49422",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49422"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49432",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49432"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49433",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49433"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49434",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49434"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49441",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49441"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49447",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49447"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49455",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49455"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49468",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49468"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49472",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49472"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49475",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49475"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49481",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49481"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49486",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49486"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49492",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49492"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49498",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49498"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49503",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49503"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49508",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49508"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49515",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49515"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49519",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49519"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49520",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49520"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49521",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49521"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49523",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49523"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49526",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49526"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49532",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49532"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49545",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49545"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49559",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49559"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49581",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49581"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49583",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49583"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49584",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49584"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49592",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49592"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49603",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49603"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49605",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49605"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49606",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49606"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49607",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49607"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49611",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49611"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49613",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49613"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49625",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49625"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49627",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49627"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49631",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49631"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49634",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49634"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49640",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49640"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49641",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49641"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49642",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49642"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49643",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49643"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49646",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49646"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49648",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49648"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49653",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49653"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49656",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49656"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49657",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49657"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49663",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49663"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49670",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49670"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49671",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49671"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49672",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49672"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49673",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49673"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49674",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49674"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49675",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49675"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49679",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49679"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49688",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49688"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49699",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49699"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49707",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49707"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49708",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49708"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49710",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49710"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49716",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49716"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49721",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49721"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49723",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49723"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49726",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49726"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49731",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49731"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-48876",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-48876"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53681",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53681"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-54460",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-54460"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-55642",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-55642"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56613",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56613"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56624",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56624"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56638",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56638"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56653",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56653"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56657",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56657"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56669",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56669"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56710",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56710"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56714",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56714"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56772",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56772"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56773",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56773"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-57878",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57878"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-57879",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57879"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-57885",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57885"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21644",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21644"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21659",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21659"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56171",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56171"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-27113",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-27113"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-57993",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57993"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-58009",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-58009"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-58061",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-58061"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-58068",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-58068"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-58077",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-58077"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21706",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21706"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21707",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21707"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21829",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21829"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21830",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21830"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21832",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21832"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49057",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49057"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49062",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49062"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49064",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49064"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49070",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49070"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49139",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49139"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49204",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49204"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49205",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49205"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49207",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49207"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49209",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49209"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49225",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49225"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49228",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49228"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49237",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49237"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49330",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49330"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49353",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49353"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49406",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49406"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49436",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49436"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49446",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49446"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49476",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49476"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49511",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49511"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49518",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49518"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49538",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49538"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49548",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49548"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49552",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49552"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49560",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49560"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49565",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49565"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49624",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49624"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49638",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49638"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49655",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49655"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49658",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49658"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49697",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49697"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49732",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49732"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49739",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49739"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49746",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49746"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49759",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49759"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52933",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52933"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52941",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52941"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52976",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52976"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52984",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52984"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52992",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52992"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52993",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52993"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53006",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53006"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53007",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53007"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53015",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53015"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53016",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53016"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53019",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53019"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53026",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53026"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53029",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53029"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53030",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53030"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53033",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53033"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46736",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46736"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46796",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46796"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-57990",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57990"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-57999",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57999"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-58057",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-58057"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-58078",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-58078"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-58079",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-58079"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21723",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21723"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21732",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21732"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21810",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21810"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21825",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21825"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21828",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21828"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21844",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21844"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21847",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21847"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21856",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21856"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21857",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21857"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21864",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21864"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21869",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21869"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21870",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21870"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21876",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21876"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21883",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21883"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21886",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21886"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21888",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21888"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21890",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21890"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-8176",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-8176"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-24928",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-24928"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21913",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21913"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21916",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21916"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21918",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21918"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21924",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21924"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21936",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21936"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21938",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21938"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21962",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21962"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21963",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21963"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21964",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21964"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21978",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21978"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21979",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21979"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21986",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21986"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49220",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49220"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49372",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49372"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49578",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49578"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49589",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49589"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49620",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49620"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52997",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52997"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53031",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53031"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-57952",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57952"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21691",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21691"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-27516",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-27516"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21953",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21953"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-4516",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-4516"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-9287",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-9287"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-32414",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-32414"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-32415",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-32415"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49171",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49171"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49197",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49197"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49561",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49561"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49590",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49590"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52928",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52928"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52937",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52937"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52938",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52938"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52981",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52981"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52982",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52982"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52986",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52986"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53009",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53009"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53032",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53032"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-58070",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-58070"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-58088",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-58088"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21808",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21808"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21836",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21836"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21854",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21854"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21884",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21884"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21889",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21889"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21895",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21895"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21906",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21906"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21908",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21908"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21930",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21930"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21961",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21961"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21966",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21966"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-4947",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-4947"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-5025",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-5025"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56433",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56433"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-1390",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-1390"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-29088",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-29088"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-32434",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-32434"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-43859",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-43859"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-58074",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-58074"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21974",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21974"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-6021",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-6021"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49636",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49636"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21939",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21939"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-47081",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47081"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-3576",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-3576"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-57987",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57987"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-57988",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57988"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-57995",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57995"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-58015",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-58015"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-58062",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-58062"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21713",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21713"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21770",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21770"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21880",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21880"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-3995",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-3995"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-3996",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-3996"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-6069",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-6069"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21809",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21809"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-8194",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-8194"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-50182",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-50182"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47316",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47316"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-32256",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-32256"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-25260",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-25260"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-1371",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-1371"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-1376",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-1376"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-1377",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-1377"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-49794",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-49794"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-49796",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-49796"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-54456",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-54456"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21783",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21783"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-6965",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-6965"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-55163",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-55163"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26462",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26462"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-1352",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-1352"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-1365",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-1365"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-1372",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-1372"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-27587",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-27587"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-49795",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-49795"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-6170",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-6170"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-8732",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-8732"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-9086",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-9086"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-41248",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-41248"
}
],
"initial_release_date": "2025-12-02T00:00:00",
"last_revision_date": "2025-12-02T00:00:00",
"links": [],
"reference": "CERTFR-2025-AVI-1057",
"revisions": [
{
"description": "Version initiale",
"revision_date": "2025-12-02T00:00:00.000000"
}
],
"risks": [
{
"description": "Non sp\u00e9cifi\u00e9 par l\u0027\u00e9diteur"
}
],
"summary": "De multiples vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9s ont \u00e9t\u00e9 d\u00e9couvertes dans les produits VMware. Elles permettent \u00e0 un attaquant de provoquer un probl\u00e8me de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 non sp\u00e9cifi\u00e9 par l\u0027\u00e9diteur.",
"title": "Multiples vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9s dans les produits VMware",
"vendor_advisories": [
{
"published_at": "2025-12-01",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 VMware 36560",
"url": "https://support.broadcom.com/web/ecx/support-content-notification/-/external/content/SecurityAdvisories/0/36560"
},
{
"published_at": "2025-12-01",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 VMware 36564",
"url": "https://support.broadcom.com/web/ecx/support-content-notification/-/external/content/SecurityAdvisories/0/36564"
}
]
}
CERTFR-2026-AVI-1165
Vulnerability from certfr_avis - Published: 2026-09-11 - Updated: 2026-09-11
De multiples vulnérabilités ont été découvertes dans les produits IBM. Certaines d'entre elles permettent à un attaquant de provoquer une exécution de code arbitraire à distance, une élévation de privilèges et un déni de service à distance.
Solutions
Se référer au bulletin de sécurité de l'éditeur pour l'obtention des correctifs (cf. section Documentation).
| Vendor | Product | Description | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| IBM | Db2 | Db2 Common Container sans le correctif de sécurité 1159cn3 | ||
| IBM | Informix Dynamic Server | Informix Dynamic Server versions 15.0.x antérieures à 15.0.1.14 | ||
| IBM | QRadar Hub | QRadar Hub versions antérieures à 3.9.1 | ||
| IBM | WebSphere Application Server | WebSphere Application Server Liberty versions antérieures à 26.0.0.10 (disponibilité prévue pour le quatrième trimestre 2026) | ||
| IBM | Informix Dynamic Server | Informix Dynamic Server versions 12.10 antérieures à InformixHQ 3.3.1 | ||
| IBM | Informix Dynamic Server | Informix Dynamic Server versions 14.10.x antérieures à 14.10.xC14 | ||
| IBM | Db2 | Db2 versions V11.5.x sans le correctif de sécurité DT495924, DT474170, DT495462, DT470425 et DT501356 | ||
| IBM | Sterling Partner Engagement Manager Essentials Edition | Sterling Partner Engagement Manager Essentials Edition versions 6.2.4.x antérieures à 6.2.4.5 | ||
| IBM | Db2 | Db2 Bridge versions antérieures à 1.1.5.2 | ||
| IBM | Db2 | Db2 Warehouse on Cloud Pak for Data versions antérieures à v5.4 patch 6 | ||
| IBM | Sterling Partner Engagement Manager Standard Edition | Sterling Partner Engagement Manager Standard Edition versions 6.2.4.x antérieures à 6.2.4.5 | ||
| IBM | Db2 | Db2 Developer Extension versions 1.1.x antérieures à 1.1.2 | ||
| IBM | Sterling Partner Engagement Manager Essentials Edition | Sterling Partner Engagement Manager Essentials Edition versions 6.3.0.x antérieures à 6.3.0.3 | ||
| IBM | Db2 | Db2 on Cloud Pak for Data versions antérieures à v5.4 patch 6 | ||
| IBM | Db2 | Db2 versions V12.1 sans le correctif de sécurité DT495924, DT495462 et DT474170 |
| Title | Publication Time | Tags | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
{
"$ref": "https://www.cert.ssi.gouv.fr/openapi.json",
"affected_systems": [
{
"description": "Db2 Common Container sans le correctif de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 1159cn3",
"product": {
"name": "Db2",
"vendor": {
"name": "IBM",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "Informix Dynamic Server versions 15.0.x ant\u00e9rieures \u00e0 15.0.1.14",
"product": {
"name": "Informix Dynamic Server",
"vendor": {
"name": "IBM",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "QRadar Hub versions ant\u00e9rieures \u00e0 3.9.1",
"product": {
"name": "QRadar Hub",
"vendor": {
"name": "IBM",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "WebSphere Application Server Liberty versions ant\u00e9rieures \u00e0 26.0.0.10 (disponibilit\u00e9 pr\u00e9vue pour le quatri\u00e8me trimestre 2026)",
"product": {
"name": "WebSphere Application Server",
"vendor": {
"name": "IBM",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "Informix Dynamic Server versions 12.10 ant\u00e9rieures \u00e0 InformixHQ 3.3.1",
"product": {
"name": "Informix Dynamic Server",
"vendor": {
"name": "IBM",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "Informix Dynamic Server versions 14.10.x ant\u00e9rieures \u00e0 14.10.xC14",
"product": {
"name": "Informix Dynamic Server",
"vendor": {
"name": "IBM",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "Db2 versions V11.5.x sans le correctif de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 DT495924, DT474170, DT495462, DT470425 et DT501356",
"product": {
"name": "Db2",
"vendor": {
"name": "IBM",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "Sterling Partner Engagement Manager Essentials Edition versions 6.2.4.x ant\u00e9rieures \u00e0 6.2.4.5",
"product": {
"name": "Sterling Partner Engagement Manager Essentials Edition",
"vendor": {
"name": "IBM",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "Db2 Bridge versions ant\u00e9rieures \u00e0 1.1.5.2",
"product": {
"name": "Db2",
"vendor": {
"name": "IBM",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "Db2 Warehouse on Cloud Pak for Data versions ant\u00e9rieures \u00e0 v5.4 patch 6",
"product": {
"name": "Db2",
"vendor": {
"name": "IBM",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "Sterling Partner Engagement Manager Standard Edition versions 6.2.4.x ant\u00e9rieures \u00e0 6.2.4.5",
"product": {
"name": "Sterling Partner Engagement Manager Standard Edition",
"vendor": {
"name": "IBM",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "Db2 Developer Extension versions 1.1.x ant\u00e9rieures \u00e0 1.1.2",
"product": {
"name": "Db2",
"vendor": {
"name": "IBM",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "Sterling Partner Engagement Manager Essentials Edition versions 6.3.0.x ant\u00e9rieures \u00e0 6.3.0.3",
"product": {
"name": "Sterling Partner Engagement Manager Essentials Edition",
"vendor": {
"name": "IBM",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "Db2 on Cloud Pak for Data versions ant\u00e9rieures \u00e0 v5.4 patch 6",
"product": {
"name": "Db2",
"vendor": {
"name": "IBM",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "Db2 versions V12.1 sans le correctif de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 DT495924, DT495462 et DT474170",
"product": {
"name": "Db2",
"vendor": {
"name": "IBM",
"scada": false
}
}
}
],
"affected_systems_content": "",
"content": "## Solutions\n\nSe r\u00e9f\u00e9rer au bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 de l\u0027\u00e9diteur pour l\u0027obtention des correctifs (cf. section Documentation).",
"cves": [
{
"name": "CVE-2026-75595",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-75595"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-49978",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-49978"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40931",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40931"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52471",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52471"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-5588",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-5588"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-33036",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-33036"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-44906",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-44906"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-54264",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-54264"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50142",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50142"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-59651",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-59651"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-45819",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45819"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46826",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46826"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42070",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42070"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36889",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36889"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52675",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52675"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35810",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35810"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-50557",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-50557"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41093",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41093"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-59295",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-59295"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52834",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52834"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38627",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38627"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-43642",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-43642"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-21409",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-21409"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52622",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52622"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2018-14042",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2018-14042"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35939",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35939"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-2534",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-2534"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38555",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38555"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41009",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41009"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-41254",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-41254"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36921",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36921"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36939",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36939"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39503",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39503"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26656",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26656"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42246",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42246"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26614",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26614"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-16480",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-16480"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2018-1334",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2018-1334"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52762",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52762"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26974",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26974"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40988",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40988"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-32990",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-32990"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26595",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26595"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-50645",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-50645"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-22610",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-22610"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42292",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42292"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-42041",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-42041"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2014-125087",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2014-125087"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-14686",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-14686"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-68763",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-68763"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-1370",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-1370"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-45416",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45416"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36904",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36904"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52845",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52845"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-33201",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-33201"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-10050",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-10050"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27010",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27010"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42284",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42284"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35912",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35912"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47432",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47432"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53666",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53666"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-25739",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-25739"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-59648",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-59648"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-69153",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-69153"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-3621",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-3621"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-43515",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43515"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-42402",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-42402"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47304",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47304"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35807",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35807"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48632",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48632"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-43868",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43868"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-50560",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-50560"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26586",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26586"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41060",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41060"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2015-5237",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2015-5237"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-71290",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-71290"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2019-10099",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2019-10099"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26585",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26585"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-41716",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-41716"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2018-11760",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2018-11760"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-15328",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-15328"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-59645",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-59645"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-45688",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-45688"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26961",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26961"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38608",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38608"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-23944",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-23944"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-33891",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-33891"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50275",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50275"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-13006",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-13006"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26638",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26638"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2018-8024",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2018-8024"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47284",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47284"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27397",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27397"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49350",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49350"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48619",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48619"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46679",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46679"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-66412",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-66412"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-36131",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-36131"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36945",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36945"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52653",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52653"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-54514",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-54514"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52756",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52756"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40924",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40924"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2018-14040",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2018-14040"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35854",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35854"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-28757",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-28757"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-77414",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-77414"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2020-11988",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-11988"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-46939",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-46939"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-56200",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-56200"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-37071",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-37071"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-77413",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-77413"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52878",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52878"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-54399",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-54399"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53668",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53668"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41038",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41038"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-30065",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-30065"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-16243",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-16243"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2016-4055",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2016-4055"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-9171",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-9171"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-67214",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-67214"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-37356",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-37356"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48743",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48743"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-25638",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-25638"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-12185",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-12185"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-59921",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-59921"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-47118",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47118"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35824",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35824"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-47010",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-47010"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-45853",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-45853"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26704",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26704"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35925",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35925"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-45288",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-45288"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36886",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36886"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26976",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26976"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-14685",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-14685"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52803",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52803"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-45178",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-45178"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-54171",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-54171"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-21823",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-21823"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-31160",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-31160"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47441",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47441"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2020-10683",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-10683"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2018-1273",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2018-1273"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-41239",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-41239"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26600",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26600"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-33814",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-33814"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-28746",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-28746"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-47891",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-47891"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52847",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52847"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42114",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42114"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2020-26945",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-26945"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52864",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52864"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50302",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50302"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-68569",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-68569"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-59084",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-59084"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-65183",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-65183"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35897",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35897"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-14257",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-14257"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-41901",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-41901"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-73088",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-73088"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52478",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52478"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-23945",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-23945"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-41182",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-41182"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38596",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38596"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-25647",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-25647"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-9072",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-9072"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-26612",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-26612"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36929",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36929"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26802",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26802"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-18097",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-18097"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40904",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40904"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42084",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42084"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47455",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47455"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52492",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52492"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-36364",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-36364"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-73089",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-73089"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-34610",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-34610"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-47057",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-47057"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-47561",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47561"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52669",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52669"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36883",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36883"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-31881",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-31881"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2019-11358",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2019-11358"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-69152",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-69152"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26665",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26665"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-68525",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-68525"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27062",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27062"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-59901",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-59901"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40960",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40960"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35839",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35839"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26852",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26852"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40997",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40997"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27395",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27395"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-14525",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-14525"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-67313",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-67313"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2020-13955",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-13955"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42154",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42154"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42228",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42228"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-8858",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-8858"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-42580",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-42580"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47352",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47352"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36004",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36004"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-41691",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-41691"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26921",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26921"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-43889",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43889"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35952",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35952"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26859",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26859"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-65637",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-65637"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2018-8009",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2018-8009"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-50163",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-50163"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-67315",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-67315"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-54516",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-54516"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-55223",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-55223"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-7962",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-7962"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-18499",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-18499"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2019-20444",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2019-20444"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-54515",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-54515"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-5516",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-5516"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-34462",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-34462"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41007",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41007"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-41721",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-41721"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2018-1313",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2018-1313"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-16221",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-16221"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-34454",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-34454"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35814",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35814"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-46337",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-46337"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-6790",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-6790"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-65911",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-65911"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52764",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52764"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-18401",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-18401"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-35516",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-35516"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26698",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26698"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26686",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26686"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35946",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35946"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-44487",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-44487"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-29857",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-29857"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35959",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35959"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26645",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26645"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-66143",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-66143"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36020",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36020"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42240",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42240"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-66144",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-66144"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35962",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35962"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-44494",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-44494"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-26049",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-26049"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40972",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40972"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-42585",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-42585"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50192",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50192"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26720",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26720"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35855",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35855"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36917",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36917"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-45018",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-45018"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-12860",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-12860"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-10571",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-10571"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-34447",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-34447"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-65901",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-65901"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-11541",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-11541"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2014-3578",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2014-3578"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-41635",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-41635"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-43871",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43871"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52784",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52784"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-40897",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-40897"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-31880",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-31880"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-29025",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-29025"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-43880",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43880"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47461",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47461"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-11546",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-11546"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-42036",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-42036"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40959",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40959"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64607",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64607"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-59652",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-59652"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27042",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27042"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-34453",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-34453"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26669",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26669"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26801",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26801"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27043",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27043"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41761",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41761"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36007",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36007"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-65903",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-65903"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47311",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47311"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-65900",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-65900"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-66010",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-66010"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-52746",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-52746"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-28762",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-28762"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-3635",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-3635"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-43827",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43827"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-50184",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-50184"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-47885",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-47885"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-50169",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-50169"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47287",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47287"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47338",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47338"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26940",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26940"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-47065",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-47065"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-55831",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-55831"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35937",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35937"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-5072",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-5072"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-47841",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-47841"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-23337",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-23337"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36952",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36952"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38581",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38581"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-41707",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-41707"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-23369",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-23369"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-77415",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-77415"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-42403",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-42403"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41056",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41056"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38586",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38586"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26880",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26880"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-31777",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-31777"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2019-14893",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2019-14893"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-10534",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-10534"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36025",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36025"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-59880",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-59880"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-65432",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-65432"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-59894",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-59894"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2019-0231",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2019-0231"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-50298",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-50298"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-15057",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-15057"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-41607",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-41607"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26308",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26308"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-1992",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-1992"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-44248",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-44248"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2018-20676",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2018-20676"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26773",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26773"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53197",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53197"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36017",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36017"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-31141",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-31141"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27434",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27434"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-13755",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-13755"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-62718",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-62718"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-36136",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-36136"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35852",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35852"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26931",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26931"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47560",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47560"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-49458",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-49458"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-4800",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-4800"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40974",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40974"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-42584",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-42584"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35924",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35924"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-4410",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-4410"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36928",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36928"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38558",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38558"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-44249",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-44249"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52775",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52775"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-41284",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-41284"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-36008",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-36008"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-59647",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-59647"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42124",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42124"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36960",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36960"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-35517",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-35517"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-30172",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-30172"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-42577",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-42577"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-58059",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-58059"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-48978",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-48978"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47582",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47582"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52781",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52781"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47385",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47385"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-75596",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-75596"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-8484",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-8484"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-8763",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-8763"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-6051",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-6051"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-44598",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-44598"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52486",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52486"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40989",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40989"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35845",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35845"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-14917",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-14917"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52619",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52619"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52796",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52796"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36286",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36286"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-15325",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-15325"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47073",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47073"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-69247",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-69247"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-49268",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-49268"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36124",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36124"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47579",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47579"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-33671",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-33671"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-14976",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-14976"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-5598",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-5598"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68470",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68470"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27017",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27017"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-65182",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-65182"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2018-11087",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2018-11087"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-42033",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-42033"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39502",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39502"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-42035",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-42035"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26804",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26804"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-18446",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-18446"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-44495",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-44495"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27065",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27065"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-41695",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-41695"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-23454",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-23454"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27388",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27388"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50082",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50082"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-22740",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-22740"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-47890",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-47890"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52686",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52686"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36005",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36005"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-3510",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-3510"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-59903",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-59903"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40977",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40977"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-3509",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-3509"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-14684",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-14684"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36905",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36905"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-56746",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-56746"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35893",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35893"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40983",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40983"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-37137",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-37137"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-10842",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-10842"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47236",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47236"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-51074",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-51074"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53122",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53122"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47373",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47373"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-9496",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-9496"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-34478",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-34478"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-42586",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-42586"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-35091",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-35091"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-57807",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57807"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-30474",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-30474"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41008",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41008"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-40984",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-40984"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-41973",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-41973"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52683",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52683"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52800",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52800"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-8184",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-8184"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-54428",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-54428"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-50162",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-50162"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-42043",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-42043"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26935",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26935"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-11143",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-11143"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-15055",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-15055"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-8646",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-8646"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-45822",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45822"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-36006",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-36006"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-40477",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-40477"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-35701",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-35701"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26846",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26846"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-47834",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-47834"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-34480",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-34480"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-14682",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-14682"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35890",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35890"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41041",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41041"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2018-20677",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2018-20677"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42131",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42131"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-84305",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-84305"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35944",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35944"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-73180",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-73180"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42079",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42079"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35898",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35898"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-59869",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-59869"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-47887",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-47887"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27399",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27399"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-36186",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-36186"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36270",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36270"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-62243",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-62243"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-22946",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-22946"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-65904",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-65904"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-58061",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-58061"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-12758",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-12758"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-40175",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-40175"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52469",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52469"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26740",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26740"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-69151",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-69151"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35809",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35809"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-43854",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43854"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50264",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50264"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41005",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41005"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-44935",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-44935"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-27970",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-27970"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47468",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47468"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52877",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52877"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-9320",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-9320"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-49459",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-49459"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52809",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52809"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-36090",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-36090"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-27568",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-27568"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-6053",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-6053"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41039",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41039"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-23953",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-23953"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-54265",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-54265"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68161",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68161"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52451",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52451"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41097",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41097"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-38296",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-38296"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21785",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21785"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-24823",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-24823"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39472",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39472"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35790",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35790"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26649",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26649"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-56624",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-56624"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-34455",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-34455"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-41184",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-41184"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-33621",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-33621"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36978",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36978"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-29131",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-29131"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-41183",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-41183"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42225",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42225"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-29869",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-29869"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-41240",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-41240"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-67317",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-67317"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-40478",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-40478"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-22748",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-22748"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-33012",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-33012"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41066",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41066"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-34479",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-34479"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-52804",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-52804"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-43828",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43828"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-42040",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-42040"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-36478",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-36478"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-37136",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-37136"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2018-1330",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2018-1330"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-47027",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-47027"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35947",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35947"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-47058",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-47058"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36927",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36927"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42244",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42244"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48836",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48836"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-16441",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-16441"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-6763",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-6763"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-6052",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-6052"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41012",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41012"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53088",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53088"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26826",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26826"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-14981",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-14981"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-58060",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-58060"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26583",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26583"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-21295",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-21295"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36922",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36922"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-42778",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-42778"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-14683",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-14683"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47527",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47527"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35847",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35847"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35896",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35896"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40912",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40912"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26733",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26733"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-14529",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-14529"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2019-0204",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2019-0204"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26851",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26851"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-2047",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-2047"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39487",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39487"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2018-11793",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2018-11793"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-22741",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-22741"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-39410",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-39410"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35888",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35888"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-25710",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-25710"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-12802",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-12802"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26837",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26837"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-7254",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-7254"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46695",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46695"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48773",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48773"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2020-9492",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-9492"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52798",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52798"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-31076",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-31076"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-40181",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-40181"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52700",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52700"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-14923",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-14923"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36901",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36901"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-10649",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-10649"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-50020",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-50020"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40998",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40998"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27013",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27013"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-29133",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-29133"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41090",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41090"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-54512",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-54512"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-58063",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-58063"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-57819",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-57819"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-42578",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-42578"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47624",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47624"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47495",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47495"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35910",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35910"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26675",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26675"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48757",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48757"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-24857",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-24857"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-65899",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-65899"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-43514",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43514"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-45773",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45773"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-67319",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-67319"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49949",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49949"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-10532",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-10532"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52470",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52470"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26906",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26906"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-24785",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-24785"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-2518",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-2518"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36971",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36971"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26840",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26840"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-46120",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-46120"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50099",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50099"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-57979",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57979"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-52046",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-52046"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-43797",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-43797"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-70907",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-70907"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-48589",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-48589"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26584",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26584"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-37404",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-37404"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47386",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47386"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52832",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52832"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-42404",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-42404"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41092",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41092"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-45787",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-45787"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40995",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40995"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2018-1199",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2018-1199"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-14041",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-14041"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47412",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47412"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48754",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48754"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-41586",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-41586"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-16192",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-16192"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-5569",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-5569"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-2950",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-2950"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2016-6811",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2016-6811"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52662",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52662"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-68945",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-68945"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42238",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42238"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-44981",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-44981"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-40895",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-40895"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-47063",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-47063"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-1493",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-1493"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-12816",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-12816"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47466",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47466"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40929",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40929"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-43830",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43830"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-59083",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-59083"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-27553",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-27553"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-47535",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47535"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-45772",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45772"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52428",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52428"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47289",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47289"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52730",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52730"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42090",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42090"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-41606",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-41606"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36941",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36941"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-59888",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-59888"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36896",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36896"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-10543",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-10543"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-6040",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-6040"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-13149",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-13149"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26958",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26958"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36902",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36902"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-47021",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-47021"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41042",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41042"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-6485",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-6485"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-47842",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-47842"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-3050",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-3050"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-40167",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-40167"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2018-1274",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2018-1274"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47383",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47383"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-59898",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-59898"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-16440",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-16440"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36924",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36924"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64958",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64958"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-9823",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-9823"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35835",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35835"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38570",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38570"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-66422",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-66422"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26939",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26939"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-22569",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-22569"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26960",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26960"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26735",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26735"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36489",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36489"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41762",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41762"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40901",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40901"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-6378",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-6378"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38575",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38575"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47384",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47384"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-41006",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-41006"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-41711",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-41711"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47321",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47321"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-45205",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45205"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-27830",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-27830"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52679",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52679"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39471",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39471"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47018",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47018"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-44487",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-44487"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-13506",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-13506"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26640",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26640"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35899",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35899"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52881",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52881"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-2482",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-2482"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-11897",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-11897"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-35092",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-35092"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-42038",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-42038"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-49844",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-49844"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36919",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36919"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-46972",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-46972"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-18096",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-18096"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35823",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35823"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-34169",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-34169"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-2332",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-2332"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-1561",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-1561"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26923",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26923"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40954",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40954"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35989",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35989"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-42039",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-42039"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-59879",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-59879"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35877",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35877"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-46968",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46968"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-40972",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-40972"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-43892",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43892"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-50010",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-50010"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27020",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27020"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48760",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48760"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42096",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42096"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52658",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52658"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26769",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26769"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-36479",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-36479"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50256",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50256"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-59296",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-59296"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38619",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38619"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38573",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38573"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-33672",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-33672"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-75838",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-75838"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2018-14041",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2018-14041"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48804",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48804"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-40983",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-40983"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-24549",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-24549"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-42581",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-42581"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47408",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47408"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39476",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39476"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-0915",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-0915"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-47668",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47668"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-29267",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-29267"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35938",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35938"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-42779",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-42779"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47097",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47097"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42322",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42322"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-43513",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43513"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-28370",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-28370"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42094",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42094"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-54517",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-54517"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27019",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27019"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-23848",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-23848"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26843",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26843"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48747",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48747"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-25639",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-25639"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-40973",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-40973"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41040",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41040"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2020-11022",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-11022"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38564",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38564"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-15064",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-15064"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-42044",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-42044"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36950",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36950"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40927",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40927"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-31684",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-31684"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-25193",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-25193"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52667",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52667"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-8620",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-8620"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41014",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41014"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-65905",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-65905"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-16439",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-16439"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-14915",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-14915"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-56745",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-56745"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2018-16487",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2018-16487"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-8633",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-8633"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-31159",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-31159"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-11714",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-11714"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2016-10735",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2016-10735"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-52903",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-52903"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-47838",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-47838"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-42550",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-42550"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2017-18214",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2017-18214"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-22870",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22870"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-59642",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-59642"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40941",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40941"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52703",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52703"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40679",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40679"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-42034",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-42034"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-47884",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-47884"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-41417",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-41417"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-61308",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-61308"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-23215",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23215"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-48043",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-48043"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-9322",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-9322"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41055",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41055"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-87958",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-87958"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-22745",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-22745"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-30171",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-30171"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-42587",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-42587"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-54513",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-54513"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38541",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38541"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47491",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47491"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40984",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40984"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-14914",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-14914"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36016",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36016"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52922",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52922"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-65927",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-65927"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48866",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48866"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-9563",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-9563"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52623",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52623"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-54518",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-54518"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2020-9480",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-9480"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36114",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36114"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-47244",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-47244"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38540",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38540"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-13676",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-13676"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26759",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26759"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-54297",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-54297"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53434",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53434"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2011-4969",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2011-4969"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-60589",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-60589"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-67312",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-67312"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-6938",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-6938"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-8916",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-8916"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35884",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35884"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41076",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41076"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-66142",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-66142"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-8885",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-8885"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52464",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52464"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39276",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39276"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52813",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52813"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-10051",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-10051"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53669",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53669"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39506",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39506"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-41409",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-41409"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2018-1259",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2018-1259"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36940",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36940"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52811",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52811"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-6322",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-6322"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35838",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35838"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-8400",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-8400"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-45623",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45623"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-14980",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-14980"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40978",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40978"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-24998",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-24998"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26894",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26894"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-58062",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-58062"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41023",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41023"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53104",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53104"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52615",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52615"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35801",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35801"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-12143",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-12143"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-67318",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-67318"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-59893",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-59893"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35930",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35930"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26660",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26660"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36010",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36010"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-21290",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-21290"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41035",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41035"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52560",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52560"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-50151",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-50151"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26878",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26878"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35900",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35900"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41065",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41065"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-44486",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-44486"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38598",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38598"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-42264",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-42264"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-12803",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-12803"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47069",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47069"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-8384",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-8384"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35960",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35960"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-2976",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-2976"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-59650",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-59650"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-1000",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-1000"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52840",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52840"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47548",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47548"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-44496",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-44496"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2018-8023",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2018-8023"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41091",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41091"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26853",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26853"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-44492",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-44492"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36920",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36920"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47393",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47393"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-54225",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-54225"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-39865",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-39865"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-41238",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-41238"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-47877",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-47877"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52522",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52522"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-43512",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43512"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41044",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41044"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40958",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40958"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2020-26555",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-26555"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47497",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47497"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26717",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26717"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38559",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38559"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-22570",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-22570"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-47883",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-47883"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-35515",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-35515"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-44990",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-44990"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-41007",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-41007"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-42037",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-42037"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-40898",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-40898"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42265",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42265"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-46984",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-46984"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-55760",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-55760"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-2201",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-2201"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-26048",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-26048"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-42498",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-42498"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-42042",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-42042"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42152",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42152"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-9071",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-9071"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2017-7669",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2017-7669"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-67213",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-67213"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52777",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52777"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41013",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41013"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-55833",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-55833"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35789",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35789"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52835",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52835"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-45663",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-45663"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-13586",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-13586"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-33134",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-33134"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47101",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47101"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26982",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26982"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-26112",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-26112"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39499",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39499"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-9370",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-9370"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47310",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47310"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38579",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38579"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52626",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52626"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36979",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36979"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36006",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36006"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-11806",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-11806"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52476",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52476"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42301",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42301"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-12590",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-12590"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-34477",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-34477"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-65902",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-65902"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52463",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52463"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26925",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26925"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-56819",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-56819"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-54284",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-54284"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-6321",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-6321"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-3171",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-3171"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26870",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26870"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35958",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35958"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36954",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36954"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47456",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47456"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-44490",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-44490"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2016-7103",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2016-7103"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2015-9251",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2015-9251"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-59639",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-59639"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-86093",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-86093"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36933",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36933"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-10852",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-10852"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41064",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41064"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-28338",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-28338"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40911",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40911"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2010-5312",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2010-5312"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-68494",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-68494"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26810",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26810"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52530",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52530"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26772",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26772"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2012-6708",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2012-6708"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36000",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36000"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50110",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50110"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47356",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47356"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2020-7656",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-7656"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2018-8013",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2018-8013"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47609",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47609"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-29063",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-29063"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-60147",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-60147"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-47889",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-47889"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26855",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26855"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2019-16869",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2019-16869"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52648",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52648"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-15280",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-15280"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-67316",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-67316"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-14813",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-14813"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-41881",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-41881"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-13465",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-13465"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52791",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52791"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38538",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38538"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-44488",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-44488"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42237",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42237"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47353",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47353"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52707",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52707"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-59899",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-59899"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-1718",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-1718"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-71491",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-71491"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-34481",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-34481"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27025",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27025"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27011",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27011"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36953",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36953"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26924",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26924"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47257",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47257"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-38969",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-38969"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-19880",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-19880"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46858",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46858"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-47059",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-47059"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-25168",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-25168"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-41293",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-41293"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38615",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38615"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-44989",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-44989"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-6345",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-6345"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-77310",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-77310"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-57699",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57699"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52817",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52817"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-65898",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-65898"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2020-11023",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-11023"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-5090",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-5090"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27410",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27410"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-46909",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-46909"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2019-8331",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2019-8331"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35853",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35853"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2018-1000632",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2018-1000632"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2019-20445",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2019-20445"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26907",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26907"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40961",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40961"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-59889",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-59889"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-36185",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-36185"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-11226",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-11226"
}
],
"initial_release_date": "2026-09-11T00:00:00",
"last_revision_date": "2026-09-11T00:00:00",
"links": [],
"reference": "CERTFR-2026-AVI-1165",
"revisions": [
{
"description": "Version initiale",
"revision_date": "2026-09-11T00:00:00.000000"
}
],
"risks": [
{
"description": "D\u00e9ni de service \u00e0 distance"
},
{
"description": "Injection de code indirecte \u00e0 distance (XSS)"
},
{
"description": "Injection de requ\u00eates ill\u00e9gitimes par rebond (CSRF)"
},
{
"description": "Ex\u00e9cution de code arbitraire \u00e0 distance"
},
{
"description": "Atteinte \u00e0 l\u0027int\u00e9grit\u00e9 des donn\u00e9es"
},
{
"description": "Non sp\u00e9cifi\u00e9 par l\u0027\u00e9diteur"
},
{
"description": "Falsification de requ\u00eates c\u00f4t\u00e9 serveur (SSRF)"
},
{
"description": "Contournement de la politique de s\u00e9curit\u00e9"
},
{
"description": "Atteinte \u00e0 la confidentialit\u00e9 des donn\u00e9es"
},
{
"description": "\u00c9l\u00e9vation de privil\u00e8ges"
}
],
"summary": "De multiples vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9s ont \u00e9t\u00e9 d\u00e9couvertes dans les produits IBM. Certaines d\u0027entre elles permettent \u00e0 un attaquant de provoquer une ex\u00e9cution de code arbitraire \u00e0 distance, une \u00e9l\u00e9vation de privil\u00e8ges et un d\u00e9ni de service \u00e0 distance.",
"title": "Multiples vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9s dans les produits IBM",
"vendor_advisories": [
{
"published_at": "2026-09-09",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 IBM 7286777",
"url": "https://www.ibm.com/support/pages/node/7286777"
},
{
"published_at": "2026-09-09",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 IBM 7286776",
"url": "https://www.ibm.com/support/pages/node/7286776"
},
{
"published_at": "2026-09-10",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 IBM 7286990",
"url": "https://www.ibm.com/support/pages/node/7286990"
},
{
"published_at": "2026-09-10",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 IBM 7286976",
"url": "https://www.ibm.com/support/pages/node/7286976"
},
{
"published_at": "2026-09-10",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 IBM 7286993",
"url": "https://www.ibm.com/support/pages/node/7286993"
},
{
"published_at": "2026-09-09",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 IBM 7286782",
"url": "https://www.ibm.com/support/pages/node/7286782"
},
{
"published_at": "2026-09-07",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 IBM 7286515",
"url": "https://www.ibm.com/support/pages/node/7286515"
},
{
"published_at": "2026-09-10",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 IBM 7286646",
"url": "https://www.ibm.com/support/pages/node/7286646"
},
{
"published_at": "2026-09-11",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 IBM 7287136",
"url": "https://www.ibm.com/support/pages/node/7287136"
},
{
"published_at": "2026-09-10",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 IBM 7286986",
"url": "https://www.ibm.com/support/pages/node/7286986"
},
{
"published_at": "2026-09-10",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 IBM 7286982",
"url": "https://www.ibm.com/support/pages/node/7286982"
},
{
"published_at": "2026-09-09",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 IBM 7286775",
"url": "https://www.ibm.com/support/pages/node/7286775"
},
{
"published_at": "2026-09-10",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 IBM 7286987",
"url": "https://www.ibm.com/support/pages/node/7286987"
},
{
"published_at": "2026-09-09",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 IBM 7286910",
"url": "https://www.ibm.com/support/pages/node/7286910"
},
{
"published_at": "2026-09-07",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 IBM 7286516",
"url": "https://www.ibm.com/support/pages/node/7286516"
},
{
"published_at": "2026-09-09",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 IBM 7286909",
"url": "https://www.ibm.com/support/pages/node/7286909"
}
]
}
FKIE_CVE-2023-52764
Vulnerability from fkie_nvd - Published: 2024-05-21 16:15 - Updated: 2026-06-17 06:43| Vendor | Product | Version | |
|---|---|---|---|
| linux | linux_kernel | * | |
| linux | linux_kernel | * | |
| linux | linux_kernel | * | |
| linux | linux_kernel | * | |
| linux | linux_kernel | * | |
| linux | linux_kernel | * | |
| linux | linux_kernel | * | |
| linux | linux_kernel | * |
{
"affected": [
{
"affectedData": [
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "Linux",
"programFiles": [
"drivers/media/usb/gspca/cpia1.c"
],
"repo": "https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git",
"vendor": "Linux",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "69bba62600bd91d6b7c1e8ca181faf8ac64f7060",
"status": "affected",
"version": "54e8bc5d64a651e2fb8b2366637e6a7d920a4c70",
"versionType": "git"
},
{
"lessThan": "2eee8edfff90e22980a6b22079d238c3c9d323bb",
"status": "affected",
"version": "54e8bc5d64a651e2fb8b2366637e6a7d920a4c70",
"versionType": "git"
},
{
"lessThan": "8f83c85ee88225319c52680792320c02158c2a9b",
"status": "affected",
"version": "54e8bc5d64a651e2fb8b2366637e6a7d920a4c70",
"versionType": "git"
},
{
"lessThan": "c6b6b8692218da73b33b310d7c1df90f115bdd9a",
"status": "affected",
"version": "54e8bc5d64a651e2fb8b2366637e6a7d920a4c70",
"versionType": "git"
},
{
"lessThan": "09cd8b561aa9796903710a1046957f2b112c8f26",
"status": "affected",
"version": "54e8bc5d64a651e2fb8b2366637e6a7d920a4c70",
"versionType": "git"
},
{
"lessThan": "a647f27a7426d2fe1b40da7c8fa2b81354a51177",
"status": "affected",
"version": "54e8bc5d64a651e2fb8b2366637e6a7d920a4c70",
"versionType": "git"
},
{
"lessThan": "93bddd6529f187f510eec759f37d0569243c9809",
"status": "affected",
"version": "54e8bc5d64a651e2fb8b2366637e6a7d920a4c70",
"versionType": "git"
},
{
"lessThan": "e2d7149b913d14352c82624e723ce1c211ca06d3",
"status": "affected",
"version": "54e8bc5d64a651e2fb8b2366637e6a7d920a4c70",
"versionType": "git"
},
{
"lessThan": "099be1822d1f095433f4b08af9cc9d6308ec1953",
"status": "affected",
"version": "54e8bc5d64a651e2fb8b2366637e6a7d920a4c70",
"versionType": "git"
}
]
},
{
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Linux",
"programFiles": [
"drivers/media/usb/gspca/cpia1.c"
],
"repo": "https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git",
"vendor": "Linux",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "2.6.34"
},
{
"lessThan": "2.6.34",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "0",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "4.14.*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "4.14.331",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "4.19.*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "4.19.300",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "5.4.*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "5.4.262",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "5.10.*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "5.10.202",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "5.15.*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "5.15.140",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "6.1.*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "6.1.64",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "6.5.*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "6.5.13",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "6.6.*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "6.6.3",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "6.7",
"versionType": "original_commit_for_fix"
}
]
}
],
"source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67"
}
],
"configurations": [
{
"nodes": [
{
"cpeMatch": [
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "6F120ED7-3012-4856-9F08-B433BC310335",
"versionEndExcluding": "4.14.331",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "C99DDB75-1CAC-40D0-A14D-67A2A55D6005",
"versionEndExcluding": "4.19.300",
"versionStartIncluding": "4.15",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "28B0AAED-45BA-4928-9A85-66A429B9F038",
"versionEndExcluding": "5.4.262",
"versionStartIncluding": "4.20",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "39D508B4-58C7-40C2-BE05-44E41110EB98",
"versionEndExcluding": "5.10.202",
"versionStartIncluding": "5.5",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "15D6C23C-78A3-40D2-B76B-4F1D9C2D95C0",
"versionEndExcluding": "5.15.140",
"versionStartIncluding": "5.11",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "8D7C884A-CAA2-4EA2-9FEB-5CE776D7B05F",
"versionEndExcluding": "6.1.64",
"versionStartIncluding": "5.16",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "674C4F82-C336-4B49-BF64-1DE422E889C4",
"versionEndExcluding": "6.5.13",
"versionStartIncluding": "6.2",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "B58252FA-A49C-411F-9B28-DC5FE44BC5A0",
"versionEndExcluding": "6.6.3",
"versionStartIncluding": "6.6",
"vulnerable": true
}
],
"negate": false,
"operator": "OR"
}
]
}
],
"cveTags": [],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nmedia: gspca: cpia1: shift-out-of-bounds in set_flicker\n\nSyzkaller reported the following issue:\nUBSAN: shift-out-of-bounds in drivers/media/usb/gspca/cpia1.c:1031:27\nshift exponent 245 is too large for 32-bit type \u0027int\u0027\n\nWhen the value of the variable \"sd-\u003eparams.exposure.gain\" exceeds the\nnumber of bits in an integer, a shift-out-of-bounds error is reported. It\nis triggered because the variable \"currentexp\" cannot be left-shifted by\nmore than the number of bits in an integer. In order to avoid invalid\nrange during left-shift, the conditional expression is added."
},
{
"lang": "es",
"value": "En el kernel de Linux, se resolvi\u00f3 la siguiente vulnerabilidad: media: gspca: cpia1: desplazamiento fuera de los l\u00edmites en set_flicker. Syzkaller inform\u00f3 el siguiente problema: UBSAN: desplazamiento fuera de los l\u00edmites en drivers/media/usb/gspca /cpia1.c:1031:27 el exponente de desplazamiento 245 es demasiado grande para el tipo \u0027int\u0027 de 32 bits. Cuando el valor de la variable \"sd-\u0026gt;params.exposure.gain\" excede el n\u00famero de bits en un n\u00famero entero, se realiza un desplazamiento. Se informa un error fuera de los l\u00edmites. Se activa porque la variable \"currentexp\" no puede desplazarse hacia la izquierda m\u00e1s que el n\u00famero de bits de un n\u00famero entero. Para evitar un rango no v\u00e1lido durante el desplazamiento a la izquierda, se agrega la expresi\u00f3n condicional."
}
],
"id": "CVE-2023-52764",
"lastModified": "2026-06-17T06:43:31.553",
"metrics": {
"cvssMetricV31": [
{
"cvssData": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackVector": "LOCAL",
"availabilityImpact": "HIGH",
"baseScore": 7.8,
"baseSeverity": "HIGH",
"confidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
"integrityImpact": "HIGH",
"privilegesRequired": "LOW",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"version": "3.1"
},
"exploitabilityScore": 1.8,
"impactScore": 5.9,
"source": "nvd@nist.gov",
"type": "Primary"
}
],
"ssvcV203": [
{
"source": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"ssvcData": {
"id": "CVE-2023-52764",
"options": [
{
"exploitation": "none"
},
{
"automatable": "no"
},
{
"technicalImpact": "partial"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2024-09-10T15:37:06.356182Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
}
}
]
},
"published": "2024-05-21T16:15:15.700",
"references": [
{
"source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"tags": [
"Patch"
],
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/099be1822d1f095433f4b08af9cc9d6308ec1953"
},
{
"source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"tags": [
"Patch"
],
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/09cd8b561aa9796903710a1046957f2b112c8f26"
},
{
"source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"tags": [
"Patch"
],
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/2eee8edfff90e22980a6b22079d238c3c9d323bb"
},
{
"source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"tags": [
"Patch"
],
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/69bba62600bd91d6b7c1e8ca181faf8ac64f7060"
},
{
"source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"tags": [
"Patch"
],
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/8f83c85ee88225319c52680792320c02158c2a9b"
},
{
"source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"tags": [
"Patch"
],
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/93bddd6529f187f510eec759f37d0569243c9809"
},
{
"source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"tags": [
"Patch"
],
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/a647f27a7426d2fe1b40da7c8fa2b81354a51177"
},
{
"source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"tags": [
"Patch"
],
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/c6b6b8692218da73b33b310d7c1df90f115bdd9a"
},
{
"source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"tags": [
"Patch"
],
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/e2d7149b913d14352c82624e723ce1c211ca06d3"
},
{
"source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"tags": [
"Patch"
],
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/099be1822d1f095433f4b08af9cc9d6308ec1953"
},
{
"source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"tags": [
"Patch"
],
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/09cd8b561aa9796903710a1046957f2b112c8f26"
},
{
"source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"tags": [
"Patch"
],
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/2eee8edfff90e22980a6b22079d238c3c9d323bb"
},
{
"source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"tags": [
"Patch"
],
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/69bba62600bd91d6b7c1e8ca181faf8ac64f7060"
},
{
"source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"tags": [
"Patch"
],
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/8f83c85ee88225319c52680792320c02158c2a9b"
},
{
"source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"tags": [
"Patch"
],
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/93bddd6529f187f510eec759f37d0569243c9809"
},
{
"source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"tags": [
"Patch"
],
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/a647f27a7426d2fe1b40da7c8fa2b81354a51177"
},
{
"source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"tags": [
"Patch"
],
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/c6b6b8692218da73b33b310d7c1df90f115bdd9a"
},
{
"source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"tags": [
"Patch"
],
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/e2d7149b913d14352c82624e723ce1c211ca06d3"
}
],
"sourceIdentifier": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"vulnStatus": "Analyzed",
"weaknesses": [
{
"description": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "CWE-787"
}
],
"source": "nvd@nist.gov",
"type": "Primary"
}
]
}
GHSA-3F2P-FCXQ-W4CM
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2024-05-21 18:31 – Updated: 2025-09-23 21:30In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
media: gspca: cpia1: shift-out-of-bounds in set_flicker
Syzkaller reported the following issue: UBSAN: shift-out-of-bounds in drivers/media/usb/gspca/cpia1.c:1031:27 shift exponent 245 is too large for 32-bit type 'int'
When the value of the variable "sd->params.exposure.gain" exceeds the number of bits in an integer, a shift-out-of-bounds error is reported. It is triggered because the variable "currentexp" cannot be left-shifted by more than the number of bits in an integer. In order to avoid invalid range during left-shift, the conditional expression is added.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2023-52764"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-787"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2024-05-21T16:15:15Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nmedia: gspca: cpia1: shift-out-of-bounds in set_flicker\n\nSyzkaller reported the following issue:\nUBSAN: shift-out-of-bounds in drivers/media/usb/gspca/cpia1.c:1031:27\nshift exponent 245 is too large for 32-bit type \u0027int\u0027\n\nWhen the value of the variable \"sd-\u003eparams.exposure.gain\" exceeds the\nnumber of bits in an integer, a shift-out-of-bounds error is reported. It\nis triggered because the variable \"currentexp\" cannot be left-shifted by\nmore than the number of bits in an integer. In order to avoid invalid\nrange during left-shift, the conditional expression is added.",
"id": "GHSA-3f2p-fcxq-w4cm",
"modified": "2025-09-23T21:30:53Z",
"published": "2024-05-21T18:31:20Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2023-52764"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/099be1822d1f095433f4b08af9cc9d6308ec1953"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/09cd8b561aa9796903710a1046957f2b112c8f26"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/2eee8edfff90e22980a6b22079d238c3c9d323bb"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/69bba62600bd91d6b7c1e8ca181faf8ac64f7060"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/8f83c85ee88225319c52680792320c02158c2a9b"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/93bddd6529f187f510eec759f37d0569243c9809"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/a647f27a7426d2fe1b40da7c8fa2b81354a51177"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/c6b6b8692218da73b33b310d7c1df90f115bdd9a"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/e2d7149b913d14352c82624e723ce1c211ca06d3"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
ICSA-25-226-15
Vulnerability from csaf_cisa - Published: 2025-08-12 00:00 - Updated: 2026-02-25 07:00OESA-2024-1736 (CVE-2021-47229)
Vulnerability from osv_openeuler – Published: 2024-06-21 11:07 – Updated: 2026-08-06 11:07 – Source websiteThe Linux Kernel, the operating system core itself.
Security Fix(es):
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
PCI: aardvark: Fix kernel panic during PIO transfer
Trying to start a new PIO transfer by writing value 0 in PIO_START register when previous transfer has not yet completed (which is indicated by value 1 in PIO_START) causes an External Abort on CPU, which results in kernel panic:
SError Interrupt on CPU0, code 0xbf000002 -- SError
Kernel panic - not syncing: Asynchronous SError Interrupt
To prevent kernel panic, it is required to reject a new PIO transfer when previous one has not finished yet.
If previous PIO transfer is not finished yet, the kernel may issue a new PIO request only if the previous PIO transfer timed out.
In the past the root cause of this issue was incorrectly identified (as it often happens during link retraining or after link down event) and special hack was implemented in Trusted Firmware to catch all SError events in EL3, to ignore errors with code 0xbf000002 and not forwarding any other errors to kernel and instead throw panic from EL3 Trusted Firmware handler.
Links to discussion and patches about this issue: https://git.trustedfirmware.org/TF-A/trusted-firmware-a.git/commit/?id=3c7dcdac5c50 https://lore.kernel.org/linux-pci/20190316161243.29517-1-repk@triplefau.lt/ https://lore.kernel.org/linux-pci/971be151d24312cc533989a64bd454b4@www.loen.fr/ https://review.trustedfirmware.org/c/TF-A/trusted-firmware-a/+/1541
But the real cause was the fact that during link retraining or after link down event the PIO transfer may take longer time, up to the 1.44s until it times out. This increased probability that a new PIO transfer would be issued by kernel while previous one has not finished yet.
After applying this change into the kernel, it is possible to revert the mentioned TF-A hack and SError events do not have to be caught in TF-A EL3.(CVE-2021-47229)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
phy: phy-mtk-tphy: Fix some resource leaks in mtk_phy_init()
Use clk_disable_unprepare() in the error path of mtk_phy_init() to fix some resource leaks.(CVE-2021-47234)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
net: rds: fix memory leak in rds_recvmsg
Syzbot reported memory leak in rds. The problem was in unputted refcount in case of error.
int rds_recvmsg(struct socket sock, struct msghdr msg, size_t size, int msg_flags) { ...
if (!rds_next_incoming(rs, &inc)) {
...
}
After this "if" inc refcount incremented and
if (rds_cmsg_recv(inc, msg, rs)) {
ret = -EFAULT;
goto out;
}
... out: return ret; }
in case of rds_cmsg_recv() fail the refcount won't be decremented. And it's easy to see from ftrace log, that rds_inc_addref() don't have rds_inc_put() pair in rds_recvmsg() after rds_cmsg_recv()
1) | rds_recvmsg() { 1) 3.721 us | rds_inc_addref(); 1) 3.853 us | rds_message_inc_copy_to_user(); 1) + 10.395 us | rds_cmsg_recv(); 1) + 34.260 us | }(CVE-2021-47249)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
net: ieee802154: fix null deref in parse dev addr
Fix a logic error that could result in a null deref if the user sets the mode incorrectly for the given addr type.(CVE-2021-47257)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
usb: fix various gadget panics on 10gbps cabling
usb_assign_descriptors() is called with 5 parameters, the last 4 of which are the usb_descriptor_header for: full-speed (USB1.1 - 12Mbps [including USB1.0 low-speed @ 1.5Mbps), high-speed (USB2.0 - 480Mbps), super-speed (USB3.0 - 5Gbps), super-speed-plus (USB3.1 - 10Gbps).
The differences between full/high/super-speed descriptors are usually substantial (due to changes in the maximum usb block size from 64 to 512 to 1024 bytes and other differences in the specs), while the difference between 5 and 10Gbps descriptors may be as little as nothing (in many cases the same tuning is simply good enough).
However if a gadget driver calls usb_assign_descriptors() with a NULL descriptor for super-speed-plus and is then used on a max 10gbps configuration, the kernel will crash with a null pointer dereference, when a 10gbps capable device port + cable + host port combination shows up. (This wouldn't happen if the gadget max-speed was set to 5gbps, but it of course defaults to the maximum, and there's no real reason to artificially limit it)
The fix is to simply use the 5gbps descriptor as the 10gbps descriptor, if a 10gbps descriptor wasn't provided.
Obviously this won't fix the problem if the 5gbps descriptor is also NULL, but such cases can't be so trivially solved (and any such gadgets are unlikely to be used with USB3 ports any way).(CVE-2021-47267)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
ALSA: seq: Fix race of snd_seq_timer_open()
The timer instance per queue is exclusive, and snd_seq_timer_open() should have managed the concurrent accesses. It looks as if it's checking the already existing timer instance at the beginning, but it's not right, because there is no protection, hence any later concurrent call of snd_seq_timer_open() may override the timer instance easily. This may result in UAF, as the leftover timer instance can keep running while the queue itself gets closed, as spotted by syzkaller recently.
For avoiding the race, add a proper check at the assignment of tmr->timeri again, and return -EBUSY if it's been already registered.(CVE-2021-47281)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
igb: Fix use-after-free error during reset
Cleans the next descriptor to watch (next_to_watch) when cleaning the TX ring.
Failure to do so can cause invalid memory accesses. If igb_poll() runs while the controller is reset this can lead to the driver try to free a skb that was already freed.
(The crash is harder to reproduce with the igb driver, but the same potential problem exists as the code is identical to igc)(CVE-2021-47301)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
net: ti: fix UAF in tlan_remove_one
priv is netdev private data and it cannot be used after free_netdev() call. Using priv after free_netdev() can cause UAF bug. Fix it by moving free_netdev() at the end of the function.(CVE-2021-47310)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
watchdog: Fix possible use-after-free by calling del_timer_sync()
This driver's remove path calls del_timer(). However, that function does not wait until the timer handler finishes. This means that the timer handler may still be running after the driver's remove function has finished, which would result in a use-after-free.
Fix by calling del_timer_sync(), which makes sure the timer handler has finished, and unable to re-schedule itself.(CVE-2021-47321)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
misc/libmasm/module: Fix two use after free in ibmasm_init_one
In ibmasm_init_one, it calls ibmasm_init_remote_input_dev(). Inside ibmasm_init_remote_input_dev, mouse_dev and keybd_dev are allocated by input_allocate_device(), and assigned to sp->remote.mouse_dev and sp->remote.keybd_dev respectively.
In the err_free_devices error branch of ibmasm_init_one, mouse_dev and keybd_dev are freed by input_free_device(), and return error. Then the execution runs into error_send_message error branch of ibmasm_init_one, where ibmasm_free_remote_input_dev(sp) is called to unregister the freed sp->remote.mouse_dev and sp->remote.keybd_dev.
My patch add a "error_init_remote" label to handle the error of ibmasm_init_remote_input_dev(), to avoid the uaf bugs.(CVE-2021-47334)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
media: zr364xx: fix memory leak in zr364xx_start_readpipe
syzbot reported memory leak in zr364xx driver. The problem was in non-freed urb in case of usb_submit_urb() fail.
backtrace: [<ffffffff82baedf6>] kmalloc include/linux/slab.h:561 [inline] [<ffffffff82baedf6>] usb_alloc_urb+0x66/0xe0 drivers/usb/core/urb.c:74 [<ffffffff82f7cce8>] zr364xx_start_readpipe+0x78/0x130 drivers/media/usb/zr364xx/zr364xx.c:1022 [<ffffffff84251dfc>] zr364xx_board_init drivers/media/usb/zr364xx/zr364xx.c:1383 [inline] [<ffffffff84251dfc>] zr364xx_probe+0x6a3/0x851 drivers/media/usb/zr364xx/zr364xx.c:1516 [<ffffffff82bb6507>] usb_probe_interface+0x177/0x370 drivers/usb/core/driver.c:396 [<ffffffff826018a9>] really_probe+0x159/0x500 drivers/base/dd.c:576(CVE-2021-47344)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
drm/sched: Avoid data corruptions
Wait for all dependencies of a job to complete before killing it to avoid data corruptions.(CVE-2021-47354)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
net: macb: fix use after free on rmmod
plat_dev->dev->platform_data is released by platform_device_unregister(), use of pclk and hclk is a use-after-free. Since device unregister won't need a clk device we adjust the function call sequence to fix this issue.
[ 31.261225] BUG: KASAN: use-after-free in macb_remove+0x77/0xc6 [macb_pci] [ 31.275563] Freed by task 306: [ 30.276782] platform_device_release+0x25/0x80(CVE-2021-47372)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
i2c: acpi: fix resource leak in reconfiguration device addition
acpi_i2c_find_adapter_by_handle() calls bus_find_device() which takes a reference on the adapter which is never released which will result in a reference count leak and render the adapter unremovable. Make sure to put the adapter after creating the client in the same manner that we do for OF.
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
net: encx24j600: check error in devm_regmap_init_encx24j600
devm_regmap_init may return error which caused by like out of memory, this will results in null pointer dereference later when reading or writing register:
general protection fault in encx24j600_spi_probe KASAN: null-ptr-deref in range [0x0000000000000090-0x0000000000000097] CPU: 0 PID: 286 Comm: spi-encx24j600- Not tainted 5.15.0-rc2-00142-g9978db750e31-dirty #11 9c53a778c1306b1b02359f3c2bbedc0222cba652 Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.13.0-1ubuntu1.1 04/01/2014 RIP: 0010:regcache_cache_bypass drivers/base/regmap/regcache.c:540 Code: 54 41 89 f4 55 53 48 89 fb 48 83 ec 08 e8 26 94 a8 fe 48 8d bb a0 00 00 00 48 b8 00 00 00 00 00 fc ff df 48 89 fa 48 c1 ea 03 <80> 3c 02 00 0f 85 4a 03 00 00 4c 8d ab b0 00 00 00 48 8b ab a0 00 RSP: 0018:ffffc900010476b8 EFLAGS: 00010207 RAX: dffffc0000000000 RBX: fffffffffffffff4 RCX: 0000000000000000 RDX: 0000000000000012 RSI: ffff888002de0000 RDI: 0000000000000094 RBP: ffff888013c9a000 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: fffffbfff3f9cc6a R10: ffffc900010476e8 R11: fffffbfff3f9cc69 R12: 0000000000000001 R13: 000000000000000a R14: ffff888013c9af54 R15: ffff888013c9ad08 FS: 00007ffa984ab580(0000) GS:ffff88801fe00000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 CR2: 000055a6384136c8 CR3: 000000003bbe6003 CR4: 0000000000770ef0 DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000 DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400 PKRU: 55555554 Call Trace: encx24j600_spi_probe drivers/net/ethernet/microchip/encx24j600.c:459 spi_probe drivers/spi/spi.c:397 really_probe drivers/base/dd.c:517 __driver_probe_device drivers/base/dd.c:751 driver_probe_device drivers/base/dd.c:782 __device_attach_driver drivers/base/dd.c:899 bus_for_each_drv drivers/base/bus.c:427 __device_attach drivers/base/dd.c:971 bus_probe_device drivers/base/bus.c:487 device_add drivers/base/core.c:3364 __spi_add_device drivers/spi/spi.c:599 spi_add_device drivers/spi/spi.c:641 spi_new_device drivers/spi/spi.c:717 new_device_store+0x18c/0x1f1 [spi_stub 4e02719357f1ff33f5a43d00630982840568e85e] dev_attr_store drivers/base/core.c:2074 sysfs_kf_write fs/sysfs/file.c:139 kernfs_fop_write_iter fs/kernfs/file.c:300 new_sync_write fs/read_write.c:508 (discriminator 4) vfs_write fs/read_write.c:594 ksys_write fs/read_write.c:648 do_syscall_64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:50 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:113
Add error check in devm_regmap_init_encx24j600 to avoid this situation.(CVE-2021-47440)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
can: peak_pci: peak_pci_remove(): fix UAF
When remove the module peek_pci, referencing 'chan' again after releasing 'dev' will cause UAF.
Fix this by releasing 'dev' later.
The following log reveals it:
[ 35.961814 ] BUG: KASAN: use-after-free in peak_pci_remove+0x16f/0x270 [peak_pci] [ 35.963414 ] Read of size 8 at addr ffff888136998ee8 by task modprobe/5537 [ 35.965513 ] Call Trace: [ 35.965718 ] dump_stack_lvl+0xa8/0xd1 [ 35.966028 ] print_address_description+0x87/0x3b0 [ 35.966420 ] kasan_report+0x172/0x1c0 [ 35.966725 ] ? peak_pci_remove+0x16f/0x270 [peak_pci] [ 35.967137 ] ? trace_irq_enable_rcuidle+0x10/0x170 [ 35.967529 ] ? peak_pci_remove+0x16f/0x270 [peak_pci] [ 35.967945 ] __asan_report_load8_noabort+0x14/0x20 [ 35.968346 ] peak_pci_remove+0x16f/0x270 [peak_pci] [ 35.968752 ] pci_device_remove+0xa9/0x250(CVE-2021-47456)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
isdn: mISDN: Fix sleeping function called from invalid context
The driver can call card->isac.release() function from an atomic context.
Fix this by calling this function after releasing the lock.
The following log reveals it:
[ 44.168226 ] BUG: sleeping function called from invalid context at kernel/workqueue.c:3018 [ 44.168941 ] in_atomic(): 1, irqs_disabled(): 1, non_block: 0, pid: 5475, name: modprobe [ 44.169574 ] INFO: lockdep is turned off. [ 44.169899 ] irq event stamp: 0 [ 44.170160 ] hardirqs last enabled at (0): [<0000000000000000>] 0x0 [ 44.170627 ] hardirqs last disabled at (0): [<ffffffff814209ed>] copy_process+0x132d/0x3e00 [ 44.171240 ] softirqs last enabled at (0): [<ffffffff81420a1a>] copy_process+0x135a/0x3e00 [ 44.171852 ] softirqs last disabled at (0): [<0000000000000000>] 0x0 [ 44.172318 ] Preemption disabled at: [ 44.172320 ] [<ffffffffa009b0a9>] nj_release+0x69/0x500 [netjet] [ 44.174441 ] Call Trace: [ 44.174630 ] dump_stack_lvl+0xa8/0xd1 [ 44.174912 ] dump_stack+0x15/0x17 [ 44.175166 ] mightsleep+0x3a2/0x510 [ 44.175459 ] ? nj_release+0x69/0x500 [netjet] [ 44.175791 ] might_sleep+0x82/0xe0 [ 44.176063 ] ? start_flush_work+0x20/0x7b0 [ 44.176375 ] start_flush_work+0x33/0x7b0 [ 44.176672 ] ? trace_irq_enable_rcuidle+0x85/0x170 [ 44.177034 ] ? kasan_quarantine_put+0xaa/0x1f0 [ 44.177372 ] ? kasan_quarantine_put+0xaa/0x1f0 [ 44.177711 ] __flush_work+0x11a/0x1a0 [ 44.177991 ] ? flush_work+0x20/0x20 [ 44.178257 ] ? lock_release+0x13c/0x8f0 [ 44.178550 ] ? __kasan_check_write+0x14/0x20 [ 44.178872 ] ? do_raw_spin_lock+0x148/0x360 [ 44.179187 ] ? read_lock_is_recursive+0x20/0x20 [ 44.179530 ] ? __kasan_check_read+0x11/0x20 [ 44.179846 ] ? do_raw_spin_unlock+0x55/0x900 [ 44.180168 ] ? ____kasan_slab_free+0x116/0x140 [ 44.180505 ] ? _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x41/0x60 [ 44.180878 ] ? skb_queue_purge+0x1a3/0x1c0 [ 44.181189 ] ? kfree+0x13e/0x290 [ 44.181438 ] flush_work+0x17/0x20 [ 44.181695 ] mISDN_freedchannel+0xe8/0x100 [ 44.182006 ] isac_release+0x210/0x260 [mISDNipac] [ 44.182366 ] nj_release+0xf6/0x500 [netjet] [ 44.182685 ] nj_remove+0x48/0x70 [netjet] [ 44.182989 ] pci_device_remove+0xa9/0x250(CVE-2021-47468)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
comedi: vmk80xx: fix bulk-buffer overflow
The driver is using endpoint-sized buffers but must not assume that the tx and rx buffers are of equal size or a malicious device could overflow the slab-allocated receive buffer when doing bulk transfers.(CVE-2021-47474)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
net: batman-adv: fix error handling
Syzbot reported ODEBUG warning in batadv_nc_mesh_free(). The problem was in wrong error handling in batadv_mesh_init().
Before this patch batadv_mesh_init() was calling batadv_mesh_free() in case of any batadv_*_init() calls failure. This approach may work well, when there is some kind of indicator, which can tell which parts of batadv are initialized; but there isn't any.
All written above lead to cleaning up uninitialized fields. Even if we hide ODEBUG warning by initializing bat_priv->nc.work, syzbot was able to hit GPF in batadv_nc_purge_paths(), because hash pointer in still NULL. [1]
To fix these bugs we can unwind batadv_init() calls one by one. It is good approach for 2 reasons: 1) It fixes bugs on error handling path 2) It improves the performance, since we won't call unneeded batadv_free() functions.
So, this patch makes all batadv_init() clean up all allocated memory before returning with an error to no call correspoing batadv_free() and open-codes batadv_mesh_free() with proper order to avoid touching uninitialized fields.(CVE-2021-47482)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
regmap: Fix possible double-free in regcache_rbtree_exit()
In regcache_rbtree_insert_to_block(), when 'present' realloc failed, the 'blk' which is supposed to assign to 'rbnode->block' will be freed, so 'rbnode->block' points a freed memory, in the error handling path of regcache_rbtree_init(), 'rbnode->block' will be freed again in regcache_rbtree_exit(), KASAN will report double-free as follows:
BUG: KASAN: double-free or invalid-free in kfree+0xce/0x390 Call Trace: slab_free_freelist_hook+0x10d/0x240 kfree+0xce/0x390 regcache_rbtree_exit+0x15d/0x1a0 regcache_rbtree_init+0x224/0x2c0 regcache_init+0x88d/0x1310 __regmap_init+0x3151/0x4a80 __devm_regmap_init+0x7d/0x100 madera_spi_probe+0x10f/0x333 [madera_spi] spi_probe+0x183/0x210 really_probe+0x285/0xc30
To fix this, moving up the assignment of rbnode->block to immediately after the reallocation has succeeded so that the data structure stays valid even if the second reallocation fails.(CVE-2021-47483)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
IB/qib: Protect from buffer overflow in struct qib_user_sdma_pkt fields
Overflowing either addrlimit or bytes_togo can allow userspace to trigger a buffer overflow of kernel memory. Check for overflows in all the places doing math on user controlled buffers.(CVE-2021-47485)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
net/tls: Fix flipped sign in tls_err_abort() calls
sk->sk_err appears to expect a positive value, a convention that ktls doesn't always follow and that leads to memory corruption in other code. For instance,
[kworker]
tls_encrypt_done(..., err=<negative error from crypto request>)
tls_err_abort(.., err)
sk->sk_err = err;
[task]
splice_from_pipe_feed
...
tls_sw_do_sendpage
if (sk->sk_err) {
ret = -sk->sk_err; // ret is positive
splice_from_pipe_feed (continued)
ret = actor(...) // ret is still positive and interpreted as bytes
// written, resulting in underflow of buf->len and
// sd->len, leading to huge buf->offset and bogus
// addresses computed in later calls to actor()
Fix all tls_err_abort() callers to pass a negative error code consistently and centralize the error-prone sign flip there, throwing in a warning to catch future misuse and uninlining the function so it really does only warn once.(CVE-2021-47496)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
ALSA: pcm: oss: Limit the period size to 16MB
Set the practical limit to the period size (the fragment shift in OSS) instead of a full 31bit; a too large value could lead to the exhaust of memory as we allocate temporary buffers of the period size, too.
As of this patch, we set to 16MB limit, which should cover all use cases.(CVE-2021-47509)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
nfp: Fix memory leak in nfp_cpp_area_cache_add()
In line 800 (#1), nfp_cpp_area_alloc() allocates and initializes a CPP area structure. But in line 807 (#2), when the cache is allocated failed, this CPP area structure is not freed, which will result in memory leak.
We can fix it by freeing the CPP area when the cache is allocated failed (#2).
792 int nfp_cpp_area_cache_add(struct nfp_cpp cpp, size_t size) 793 { 794 struct nfp_cpp_area_cache cache; 795 struct nfp_cpp_area *area;
800 area = nfp_cpp_area_alloc(cpp, NFP_CPP_ID(7, NFP_CPP_ACTION_RW, 0), 801 0, size); // #1: allocates and initializes
802 if (!area) 803 return -ENOMEM;
805 cache = kzalloc(sizeof(*cache), GFP_KERNEL); 806 if (!cache) 807 return -ENOMEM; // #2: missing free
817 return 0; 818 }(CVE-2021-47516)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
staging: rtl8192e: Fix use after free in _rtl92e_pci_disconnect()
The free_rtllib() function frees the "dev" pointer so there is use after free on the next line. Re-arrange things to avoid that.(CVE-2021-47571)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
soc: brcmstb: pm-arm: Fix refcount leak and __iomem leak bugs
In brcmstb_pm_probe(), there are two kinds of leak bugs:
(1) we need to add of_node_put() when for_each__matching_node() breaks (2) we need to add iounmap() for each iomap in fail path(CVE-2022-48693)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
mmc: mmc_spi: fix error handling in mmc_spi_probe()
If mmc_add_host() fails, it doesn't need to call mmc_remove_host(), or it will cause null-ptr-deref, because of deleting a not added device in mmc_remove_host().
To fix this, goto label 'fail_glue_init', if mmc_add_host() fails, and change the label 'fail_add_host' to 'fail_gpiod_request'.(CVE-2023-52708)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
net: USB: Fix wrong-direction WARNING in plusb.c
The syzbot fuzzer detected a bug in the plusb network driver: A zero-length control-OUT transfer was treated as a read instead of a write. In modern kernels this error provokes a WARNING:
usb 1-1: BOGUS control dir, pipe 80000280 doesn't match bRequestType c0 WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 4645 at drivers/usb/core/urb.c:411 usb_submit_urb+0x14a7/0x1880 drivers/usb/core/urb.c:411 Modules linked in: CPU: 1 PID: 4645 Comm: dhcpcd Not tainted 6.2.0-rc6-syzkaller-00050-g9f266ccaa2f5 #0 Hardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 01/12/2023 RIP: 0010:usb_submit_urb+0x14a7/0x1880 drivers/usb/core/urb.c:411 ... Call Trace: <TASK> usb_start_wait_urb+0x101/0x4b0 drivers/usb/core/message.c:58 usb_internal_control_msg drivers/usb/core/message.c:102 [inline] usb_control_msg+0x320/0x4a0 drivers/usb/core/message.c:153 __usbnet_read_cmd+0xb9/0x390 drivers/net/usb/usbnet.c:2010 usbnet_read_cmd+0x96/0xf0 drivers/net/usb/usbnet.c:2068 pl_vendor_req drivers/net/usb/plusb.c:60 [inline] pl_set_QuickLink_features drivers/net/usb/plusb.c:75 [inline] pl_reset+0x2f/0xf0 drivers/net/usb/plusb.c:85 usbnet_open+0xcc/0x5d0 drivers/net/usb/usbnet.c:889 __dev_open+0x297/0x4d0 net/core/dev.c:1417 __dev_change_flags+0x587/0x750 net/core/dev.c:8530 dev_change_flags+0x97/0x170 net/core/dev.c:8602 devinet_ioctl+0x15a2/0x1d70 net/ipv4/devinet.c:1147 inet_ioctl+0x33f/0x380 net/ipv4/af_inet.c:979 sock_do_ioctl+0xcc/0x230 net/socket.c:1169 sock_ioctl+0x1f8/0x680 net/socket.c:1286 vfs_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:51 [inline] __do_sys_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:870 [inline] __se_sys_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:856 [inline] __x64_sys_ioctl+0x197/0x210 fs/ioctl.c:856 do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:50 [inline] do_syscall_64+0x39/0xb0 arch/x86/entry/common.c:80 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x63/0xcd
The fix is to call usbnet_write_cmd() instead of usbnet_read_cmd() and remove the USB_DIR_IN flag.(CVE-2023-52742)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
IB/hfi1: Restore allocated resources on failed copyout
Fix a resource leak if an error occurs.(CVE-2023-52747)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
media: gspca: cpia1: shift-out-of-bounds in set_flicker
Syzkaller reported the following issue: UBSAN: shift-out-of-bounds in drivers/media/usb/gspca/cpia1.c:1031:27 shift exponent 245 is too large for 32-bit type 'int'
When the value of the variable "sd->params.exposure.gain" exceeds the number of bits in an integer, a shift-out-of-bounds error is reported. It is triggered because the variable "currentexp" cannot be left-shifted by more than the number of bits in an integer. In order to avoid invalid range during left-shift, the conditional expression is added.(CVE-2023-52764)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
fs/jfs: Add check for negative db_l2nbperpage
l2nbperpage is log2(number of blks per page), and the minimum legal value should be 0, not negative.
In the case of l2nbperpage being negative, an error will occur when subsequently used as shift exponent.
Syzbot reported this bug:
UBSAN: shift-out-of-bounds in fs/jfs/jfs_dmap.c:799:12 shift exponent -16777216 is negative(CVE-2023-52810)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
locking/ww_mutex/test: Fix potential workqueue corruption
In some cases running with the test-ww_mutex code, I was seeing odd behavior where sometimes it seemed flush_workqueue was returning before all the work threads were finished.
Often this would cause strange crashes as the mutexes would be freed while they were being used.
Looking at the code, there is a lifetime problem as the controlling thread that spawns the work allocates the "struct stress" structures that are passed to the workqueue threads. Then when the workqueue threads are finished, they free the stress struct that was passed to them.
Unfortunately the workqueue work_struct node is in the stress struct. Which means the work_struct is freed before the work thread returns and while flush_workqueue is waiting.
It seems like a better idea to have the controlling thread both allocate and free the stress structures, so that we can be sure we don't corrupt the workqueue by freeing the structure prematurely.
So this patch reworks the test to do so, and with this change I no longer see the early flush_workqueue returns.(CVE-2023-52836)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
llc: verify mac len before reading mac header
LLC reads the mac header with eth_hdr without verifying that the skb has an Ethernet header.
Syzbot was able to enter llc_rcv on a tun device. Tun can insert packets without mac len and with user configurable skb->protocol (passing a tun_pi header when not configuring IFF_NO_PI).
BUG: KMSAN: uninit-value in llc_station_ac_send_test_r net/llc/llc_station.c:81 [inline]
BUG: KMSAN: uninit-value in llc_station_rcv+0x6fb/0x1290 net/llc/llc_station.c:111
llc_station_ac_send_test_r net/llc/llc_station.c:81 [inline]
llc_station_rcv+0x6fb/0x1290 net/llc/llc_station.c:111
llc_rcv+0xc5d/0x14a0 net/llc/llc_input.c:218
__netif_receive_skb_one_core net/core/dev.c:5523 [inline]
__netif_receive_skb+0x1a6/0x5a0 net/core/dev.c:5637
netif_receive_skb_internal net/core/dev.c:5723 [inline]
netif_receive_skb+0x58/0x660 net/core/dev.c:5782
tun_rx_batched+0x3ee/0x980 drivers/net/tun.c:1555
tun_get_user+0x54c5/0x69c0 drivers/net/tun.c:2002
Add a mac_len test before all three eth_hdr(skb) calls under net/llc.
There are further uses in include/net/llc_pdu.h. All these are protected by a test skb->protocol == ETH_P_802_2. Which does not protect against this tun scenario.
But the mac_len test added in this patch in llc_fixup_skb will indirectly protect those too. That is called from llc_rcv before any other LLC code.
It is tempting to just add a blanket mac_len check in llc_rcv, but not sure whether that could break valid LLC paths that do not assume an Ethernet header. 802.2 LLC may be used on top of non-802.3 protocols in principle. The below referenced commit shows that used to, on top of Token Ring.
At least one of the three eth_hdr uses goes back to before the start of git history. But the one that syzbot exercises is introduced in this commit. That commit is old enough (2008), that effectively all stable kernels should receive this.(CVE-2023-52843)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
clk: mediatek: clk-mt2701: Add check for mtk_alloc_clk_data
Add the check for the return value of mtk_alloc_clk_data() in order to avoid NULL pointer dereference.(CVE-2023-52875)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
tty: n_gsm: require CAP_NET_ADMIN to attach N_GSM0710 ldisc
Any unprivileged user can attach N_GSM0710 ldisc, but it requires CAP_NET_ADMIN to create a GSM network anyway.
Require initial namespace CAP_NET_ADMIN to do that.(CVE-2023-52880)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
net/mlx5e: Prevent deadlock while disabling aRFS
When disabling aRFS under the priv->state_lock, any scheduled
aRFS works are canceled using the cancel_work_sync function,
which waits for the work to end if it has already started.
However, while waiting for the work handler, the handler will
try to acquire the state_lock which is already acquired.
The worker acquires the lock to delete the rules if the state is down, which is not the worker's responsibility since disabling aRFS deletes the rules.
Add an aRFS state variable, which indicates whether the aRFS is enabled and prevent adding rules when the aRFS is disabled.
Kernel log:
====================================================== WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected 6.7.0-rc4_net_next_mlx5_5483eb2 #1 Tainted: G I
ethtool/386089 is trying to acquire lock: ffff88810f21ce68 ((work_completion)(&rule->arfs_work)){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: __flush_work+0x74/0x4e0
but task is already holding lock: ffff8884a1808cc0 (&priv->state_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: mlx5e_ethtool_set_channels+0x53/0x200 [mlx5_core]
which lock already depends on the new lock.
the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is:
-> #1 (&priv->state_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}: __mutex_lock+0x80/0xc90 arfs_handle_work+0x4b/0x3b0 [mlx5_core] process_one_work+0x1dc/0x4a0 worker_thread+0x1bf/0x3c0 kthread+0xd7/0x100 ret_from_fork+0x2d/0x50 ret_from_fork_asm+0x11/0x20
-> #0 ((work_completion)(&rule->arfs_work)){+.+.}-{0:0}: __lock_acquire+0x17b4/0x2c80 lock_acquire+0xd0/0x2b0 __flush_work+0x7a/0x4e0 __cancel_work_timer+0x131/0x1c0 arfs_del_rules+0x143/0x1e0 [mlx5_core] mlx5e_arfs_disable+0x1b/0x30 [mlx5_core] mlx5e_ethtool_set_channels+0xcb/0x200 [mlx5_core] ethnl_set_channels+0x28f/0x3b0 ethnl_default_set_doit+0xec/0x240 genl_family_rcv_msg_doit+0xd0/0x120 genl_rcv_msg+0x188/0x2c0 netlink_rcv_skb+0x54/0x100 genl_rcv+0x24/0x40 netlink_unicast+0x1a1/0x270 netlink_sendmsg+0x214/0x460 __sock_sendmsg+0x38/0x60 __sys_sendto+0x113/0x170 __x64_sys_sendto+0x20/0x30 do_syscall_64+0x40/0xe0 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x46/0x4e
other info that might help us debug this:
Possible unsafe locking scenario:
CPU0 CPU1
---- ----
lock(&priv->state_lock); lock((work_completion)(&rule->arfs_work)); lock(&priv->state_lock); lock((work_completion)(&rule->arfs_work));
*** DEADLOCK ***
3 locks held by ethtool/386089: #0: ffffffff82ea7210 (cb_lock){++++}-{3:3}, at: genl_rcv+0x15/0x40 #1: ffffffff82e94c88 (rtnl_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: ethnl_default_set_doit+0xd3/0x240 #2: ffff8884a1808cc0 (&priv->state_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: mlx5e_ethtool_set_channels+0x53/0x200 [mlx5_core]
stack backtrace: CPU: 15 PID: 386089 Comm: ethtool Tainted: G I 6.7.0-rc4_net_next_mlx5_5483eb2 #1 Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), BIOS rel-1.13.0-0-gf21b5a4aeb02-prebuilt.qemu.org 04/01/2014 Call Trace: <TASK> dump_stack_lvl+0x60/0xa0 check_noncircular+0x144/0x160 __lock_acquire+0x17b4/0x2c80 lock_acquire+0xd0/0x2b0 ? __flush_work+0x74/0x4e0 ? save_trace+0x3e/0x360 ? __flush_work+0x74/0x4e0 __flush_work+0x7a/0x4e0 ? __flush_work+0x74/0x4e0 ? __lock_acquire+0xa78/0x2c80 ? lock_acquire+0xd0/0x2b0 ? mark_held_locks+0x49/0x70 __cancel_work_timer+0x131/0x1c0 ? mark_held_locks+0x49/0x70 arfs_del_rules+0x143/0x1e0 [mlx5_core] mlx5e_arfs_disable+0x1b/0x30 [mlx5_core] mlx5e_ethtool_set_channels+0xcb/0x200 [mlx5_core] ethnl_set_channels+0x28f/0x3b0 ethnl_default_set_doit+0xec/0x240 genl_family_rcv_msg_doit+0xd0/0x120 genl_rcv_msg+0x188/0x2c0 ? ethn ---truncated---(CVE-2024-27014)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
netfilter: nf_tables: Fix potential data-race in __nft_obj_type_get()
nft_unregister_obj() can concurrent with __nft_obj_type_get(), and there is not any protection when iterate over nf_tables_objects list in __nft_obj_type_get(). Therefore, there is potential data-race of nf_tables_objects list entry.
Use list_for_each_entry_rcu() to iterate over nf_tables_objects list in __nft_obj_type_get(), and use rcu_read_lock() in the caller nft_obj_type_get() to protect the entire type query process.(CVE-2024-27019)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
phonet/pep: fix racy skb_queue_empty() use
The receive queues are protected by their respective spin-lock, not the socket lock. This could lead to skb_peek() unexpectedly returning NULL or a pointer to an already dequeued socket buffer.(CVE-2024-27402)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
soc: fsl: qbman: Use raw spinlock for cgr_lock
smp_call_function always runs its callback in hard IRQ context, even on PREEMPT_RT, where spinlocks can sleep. So we need to use a raw spinlock for cgr_lock to ensure we aren't waiting on a sleeping task.
Although this bug has existed for a while, it was not apparent until commit ef2a8d5478b9 ("net: dpaa: Adjust queue depth on rate change") which invokes smp_call_function_single via qman_update_cgr_safe every time a link goes up or down.(CVE-2024-35819)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
ubifs: Set page uptodate in the correct place
Page cache reads are lockless, so setting the freshly allocated page uptodate before we've overwritten it with the data it's supposed to have in it will allow a simultaneous reader to see old data. Move the call to SetPageUptodate into ubifs_write_end(), which is after we copied the new data into the page.(CVE-2024-35821)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
wifi: libertas: fix some memleaks in lbs_allocate_cmd_buffer()
In the for statement of lbs_allocate_cmd_buffer(), if the allocation of cmdarray[i].cmdbuf fails, both cmdarray and cmdarray[i].cmdbuf needs to be freed. Otherwise, there will be memleaks in lbs_allocate_cmd_buffer().(CVE-2024-35828)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
tcp: properly terminate timers for kernel sockets
We had various syzbot reports about tcp timers firing after the corresponding netns has been dismantled.
Fortunately Josef Bacik could trigger the issue more often, and could test a patch I wrote two years ago.
When TCP sockets are closed, we call inet_csk_clear_xmit_timers() to 'stop' the timers.
inet_csk_clear_xmit_timers() can be called from any context, including when socket lock is held. This is the reason it uses sk_stop_timer(), aka del_timer(). This means that ongoing timers might finish much later.
For user sockets, this is fine because each running timer holds a reference on the socket, and the user socket holds a reference on the netns.
For kernel sockets, we risk that the netns is freed before timer can complete, because kernel sockets do not hold reference on the netns.
This patch adds inet_csk_clear_xmit_timers_sync() function that using sk_stop_timer_sync() to make sure all timers are terminated before the kernel socket is released. Modules using kernel sockets close them in their netns exit() handler.
Also add sock_not_owned_by_me() helper to get LOCKDEP support : inet_csk_clear_xmit_timers_sync() must not be called while socket lock is held.
It is very possible we can revert in the future commit 3a58f13a881e ("net: rds: acquire refcount on TCP sockets") which attempted to solve the issue in rds only. (net/smc/af_smc.c and net/mptcp/subflow.c have similar code)
We probably can remove the check_net() tests from tcp_out_of_resources() and __tcp_close() in the future.(CVE-2024-35910)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
btrfs: send: handle path ref underflow in header iterate_inode_ref()
Change BUG_ON to proper error handling if building the path buffer fails. The pointers are not printed so we don't accidentally leak kernel addresses.(CVE-2024-35935)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
wifi: cfg80211: check A-MSDU format more carefully
If it looks like there's another subframe in the A-MSDU but the header isn't fully there, we can end up reading data out of bounds, only to discard later. Make this a bit more careful and check if the subframe header can even be present.(CVE-2024-35937)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
dyndbg: fix old BUG_ON in >control parser
Fix a BUG_ON from 2009. Even if it looks "unreachable" (I didn't really look), lets make sure by removing it, doing pr_err and return -EINVAL instead.(CVE-2024-35947)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
batman-adv: Avoid infinite loop trying to resize local TT
If the MTU of one of an attached interface becomes too small to transmit the local translation table then it must be resized to fit inside all fragments (when enabled) or a single packet.
But if the MTU becomes too low to transmit even the header + the VLAN specific part then the resizing of the local TT will never succeed. This can for example happen when the usable space is 110 bytes and 11 VLANs are on top of batman-adv. In this case, at least 116 byte would be needed. There will just be an endless spam of
batman_adv: batadv0: Forced to purge local tt entries to fit new maximum fragment MTU (110)
in the log but the function will never finish. Problem here is that the timeout will be halved all the time and will then stagnate at 0 and therefore never be able to reduce the table even more.
There are other scenarios possible with a similar result. The number of BATADV_TT_CLIENT_NOPURGE entries in the local TT can for example be too high to fit inside a packet. Such a scenario can therefore happen also with only a single VLAN + 7 non-purgable addresses - requiring at least 120 bytes.
While this should be handled proactively when:
- interface with too low MTU is added
- VLAN is added
- non-purgeable local mac is added
- MTU of an attached interface is reduced
- fragmentation setting gets disabled (which most likely requires dropping attached interfaces)
not all of these scenarios can be prevented because batman-adv is only consuming events without the the possibility to prevent these actions (non-purgable MAC address added, MTU of an attached interface is reduced). It is therefore necessary to also make sure that the code is able to handle also the situations when there were already incompatible system configuration are present.(CVE-2024-35982)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
tty: n_gsm: fix possible out-of-bounds in gsm0_receive()
Assuming the following: - side A configures the n_gsm in basic option mode - side B sends the header of a basic option mode frame with data length 1 - side A switches to advanced option mode - side B sends 2 data bytes which exceeds gsm->len Reason: gsm->len is not used in advanced option mode. - side A switches to basic option mode - side B keeps sending until gsm0_receive() writes past gsm->buf Reason: Neither gsm->state nor gsm->len have been reset after reconfiguration.
Fix this by changing gsm->count to gsm->len comparison from equal to less than. Also add upper limit checks against the constant MAX_MRU in gsm0_receive() and gsm1_receive() to harden against memory corruption of gsm->len and gsm->mru.
All other checks remain as we still need to limit the data according to the user configuration and actual payload size.(CVE-2024-36016)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
tipc: fix UAF in error path
Sam Page (sam4k) working with Trend Micro Zero Day Initiative reported a UAF in the tipc_buf_append() error path:
BUG: KASAN: slab-use-after-free in kfree_skb_list_reason+0x47e/0x4c0 linux/net/core/skbuff.c:1183 Read of size 8 at addr ffff88804d2a7c80 by task poc/8034
CPU: 1 PID: 8034 Comm: poc Not tainted 6.8.2 #1 Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.16.0-debian-1.16.0-5 04/01/2014 Call Trace: <IRQ> __dump_stack linux/lib/dump_stack.c:88 dump_stack_lvl+0xd9/0x1b0 linux/lib/dump_stack.c:106 print_address_description linux/mm/kasan/report.c:377 print_report+0xc4/0x620 linux/mm/kasan/report.c:488 kasan_report+0xda/0x110 linux/mm/kasan/report.c:601 kfree_skb_list_reason+0x47e/0x4c0 linux/net/core/skbuff.c:1183 skb_release_data+0x5af/0x880 linux/net/core/skbuff.c:1026 skb_release_all linux/net/core/skbuff.c:1094 __kfree_skb linux/net/core/skbuff.c:1108 kfree_skb_reason+0x12d/0x210 linux/net/core/skbuff.c:1144 kfree_skb linux/./include/linux/skbuff.h:1244 tipc_buf_append+0x425/0xb50 linux/net/tipc/msg.c:186 tipc_link_input+0x224/0x7c0 linux/net/tipc/link.c:1324 tipc_link_rcv+0x76e/0x2d70 linux/net/tipc/link.c:1824 tipc_rcv+0x45f/0x10f0 linux/net/tipc/node.c:2159 tipc_udp_recv+0x73b/0x8f0 linux/net/tipc/udp_media.c:390 udp_queue_rcv_one_skb+0xad2/0x1850 linux/net/ipv4/udp.c:2108 udp_queue_rcv_skb+0x131/0xb00 linux/net/ipv4/udp.c:2186 udp_unicast_rcv_skb+0x165/0x3b0 linux/net/ipv4/udp.c:2346 __udp4_lib_rcv+0x2594/0x3400 linux/net/ipv4/udp.c:2422 ip_protocol_deliver_rcu+0x30c/0x4e0 linux/net/ipv4/ip_input.c:205 ip_local_deliver_finish+0x2e4/0x520 linux/net/ipv4/ip_input.c:233 NF_HOOK linux/./include/linux/netfilter.h:314 NF_HOOK linux/./include/linux/netfilter.h:308 ip_local_deliver+0x18e/0x1f0 linux/net/ipv4/ip_input.c:254 dst_input linux/./include/net/dst.h:461 ip_rcv_finish linux/net/ipv4/ip_input.c:449 NF_HOOK linux/./include/linux/netfilter.h:314 NF_HOOK linux/./include/linux/netfilter.h:308 ip_rcv+0x2c5/0x5d0 linux/net/ipv4/ip_input.c:569 __netif_receive_skb_one_core+0x199/0x1e0 linux/net/core/dev.c:5534 __netif_receive_skb+0x1f/0x1c0 linux/net/core/dev.c:5648 process_backlog+0x101/0x6b0 linux/net/core/dev.c:5976 __napi_poll.constprop.0+0xba/0x550 linux/net/core/dev.c:6576 napi_poll linux/net/core/dev.c:6645 net_rx_action+0x95a/0xe90 linux/net/core/dev.c:6781 __do_softirq+0x21f/0x8e7 linux/kernel/softirq.c:553 do_softirq linux/kernel/softirq.c:454 do_softirq+0xb2/0xf0 linux/kernel/softirq.c:441 </IRQ> <TASK> __local_bh_enable_ip+0x100/0x120 linux/kernel/softirq.c:381 local_bh_enable linux/./include/linux/bottom_half.h:33 rcu_read_unlock_bh linux/./include/linux/rcupdate.h:851 __dev_queue_xmit+0x871/0x3ee0 linux/net/core/dev.c:4378 dev_queue_xmit linux/./include/linux/netdevice.h:3169 neigh_hh_output linux/./include/net/neighbour.h:526 neigh_output linux/./include/net/neighbour.h:540 ip_finish_output2+0x169f/0x2550 linux/net/ipv4/ip_output.c:235 __ip_finish_output linux/net/ipv4/ip_output.c:313 __ip_finish_output+0x49e/0x950 linux/net/ipv4/ip_output.c:295 ip_finish_output+0x31/0x310 linux/net/ipv4/ip_output.c:323 NF_HOOK_COND linux/./include/linux/netfilter.h:303 ip_output+0x13b/0x2a0 linux/net/ipv4/ip_output.c:433 dst_output linux/./include/net/dst.h:451 ip_local_out linux/net/ipv4/ip_output.c:129 ip_send_skb+0x3e5/0x560 linux/net/ipv4/ip_output.c:1492 udp_send_skb+0x73f/0x1530 linux/net/ipv4/udp.c:963 udp_sendmsg+0x1a36/0x2b40 linux/net/ipv4/udp.c:1250 inet_sendmsg+0x105/0x140 linux/net/ipv4/af_inet.c:850 sock_sendmsg_nosec linux/net/socket.c:730 __sock_sendmsg linux/net/socket.c:745 __sys_sendto+0x42c/0x4e0 linux/net/socket.c:2191 __do_sys_sendto linux/net/socket.c:2203 __se_sys_sendto linux/net/socket.c:2199 __x64_sys_sendto+0xe0/0x1c0 linux/net/socket.c:2199 do_syscall_x64 linux/arch/x86/entry/common.c:52 do_syscall_ ---truncated---(CVE-2024-36886)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
ipv6: prevent NULL dereference in ip6_output()
According to syzbot, there is a chance that ip6_dst_idev() returns NULL in ip6_output(). Most places in IPv6 stack deal with a NULL idev just fine, but not here.
syzbot reported:
general protection fault, probably for non-canonical address 0xdffffc00000000bc: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP KASAN PTI KASAN: null-ptr-deref in range [0x00000000000005e0-0x00000000000005e7] CPU: 0 PID: 9775 Comm: syz-executor.4 Not tainted 6.9.0-rc5-syzkaller-00157-g6a30653b604a #0 Hardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 03/27/2024 RIP: 0010:ip6_output+0x231/0x3f0 net/ipv6/ip6_output.c:237 Code: 3c 1e 00 49 89 df 74 08 4c 89 ef e8 19 58 db f7 48 8b 44 24 20 49 89 45 00 49 89 c5 48 8d 9d e0 05 00 00 48 89 d8 48 c1 e8 03 <42> 0f b6 04 38 84 c0 4c 8b 74 24 28 0f 85 61 01 00 00 8b 1b 31 ff RSP: 0018:ffffc9000927f0d8 EFLAGS: 00010202 RAX: 00000000000000bc RBX: 00000000000005e0 RCX: 0000000000040000 RDX: ffffc900131f9000 RSI: 0000000000004f47 RDI: 0000000000004f48 RBP: 0000000000000000 R08: ffffffff8a1f0b9a R09: 1ffffffff1f51fad R10: dffffc0000000000 R11: fffffbfff1f51fae R12: ffff8880293ec8c0 R13: ffff88805d7fc000 R14: 1ffff1100527d91a R15: dffffc0000000000 FS: 00007f135c6856c0(0000) GS:ffff8880b9400000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 CR2: 0000000020000080 CR3: 0000000064096000 CR4: 00000000003506f0 DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000 DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400 Call Trace: <TASK> NF_HOOK include/linux/netfilter.h:314 [inline] ip6_xmit+0xefe/0x17f0 net/ipv6/ip6_output.c:358 sctp_v6_xmit+0x9f2/0x13f0 net/sctp/ipv6.c:248 sctp_packet_transmit+0x26ad/0x2ca0 net/sctp/output.c:653 sctp_packet_singleton+0x22c/0x320 net/sctp/outqueue.c:783 sctp_outq_flush_ctrl net/sctp/outqueue.c:914 [inline] sctp_outq_flush+0x6d5/0x3e20 net/sctp/outqueue.c:1212 sctp_side_effects net/sctp/sm_sideeffect.c:1198 [inline] sctp_do_sm+0x59cc/0x60c0 net/sctp/sm_sideeffect.c:1169 sctp_primitive_ASSOCIATE+0x95/0xc0 net/sctp/primitive.c:73 __sctp_connect+0x9cd/0xe30 net/sctp/socket.c:1234 sctp_connect net/sctp/socket.c:4819 [inline] sctp_inet_connect+0x149/0x1f0 net/sctp/socket.c:4834 __sys_connect_file net/socket.c:2048 [inline] __sys_connect+0x2df/0x310 net/socket.c:2065 __do_sys_connect net/socket.c:2075 [inline] __se_sys_connect net/socket.c:2072 [inline] __x64_sys_connect+0x7a/0x90 net/socket.c:2072 do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:52 [inline] do_syscall_64+0xf5/0x240 arch/x86/entry/common.c:83 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f(CVE-2024-36901)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
tcp: defer shutdown(SEND_SHUTDOWN) for TCP_SYN_RECV sockets
TCP_SYN_RECV state is really special, it is only used by cross-syn connections, mostly used by fuzzers.
In the following crash [1], syzbot managed to trigger a divide by zero in tcp_rcv_space_adjust()
A socket makes the following state transitions, without ever calling tcp_init_transfer(), meaning tcp_init_buffer_space() is also not called.
TCP_CLOSE
connect() TCP_SYN_SENT TCP_SYN_RECV shutdown() -> tcp_shutdown(sk, SEND_SHUTDOWN) TCP_FIN_WAIT1
To fix this issue, change tcp_shutdown() to not perform a TCP_SYN_RECV -> TCP_FIN_WAIT1 transition, which makes no sense anyway.
When tcp_rcv_state_process() later changes socket state from TCP_SYN_RECV to TCP_ESTABLISH, then look at sk->sk_shutdown to finally enter TCP_FIN_WAIT1 state, and send a FIN packet from a sane socket state.
This means tcp_send_fin() can now be called from BH context, and must use GFP_ATOMIC allocations.
[1] divide error: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP KASAN NOPTI CPU: 1 PID: 5084 Comm: syz-executor358 Not tainted 6.9.0-rc6-syzkaller-00022-g98369dccd2f8 #0 Hardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 03/27/2024 RIP: 0010:tcp_rcv_space_adjust+0x2df/0x890 net/ipv4/tcp_input.c:767 Code: e3 04 4c 01 eb 48 8b 44 24 38 0f b6 04 10 84 c0 49 89 d5 0f 85 a5 03 00 00 41 8b 8e c8 09 00 00 89 e8 29 c8 48 0f af c3 31 d2 <48> f7 f1 48 8d 1c 43 49 8d 96 76 08 00 00 48 89 d0 48 c1 e8 03 48 RSP: 0018:ffffc900031ef3f0 EFLAGS: 00010246 RAX: 0c677a10441f8f42 RBX: 000000004fb95e7e RCX: 0000000000000000 RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 0000000000000000 RDI: 0000000000000000 RBP: 0000000027d4b11f R08: ffffffff89e535a4 R09: 1ffffffff25e6ab7 R10: dffffc0000000000 R11: ffffffff8135e920 R12: ffff88802a9f8d30 R13: dffffc0000000000 R14: ffff88802a9f8d00 R15: 1ffff1100553f2da FS: 00005555775c0380(0000) GS:ffff8880b9500000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 CR2: 00007f1155bf2304 CR3: 000000002b9f2000 CR4: 0000000000350ef0 Call Trace: <TASK> tcp_recvmsg_locked+0x106d/0x25a0 net/ipv4/tcp.c:2513 tcp_recvmsg+0x25d/0x920 net/ipv4/tcp.c:2578 inet6_recvmsg+0x16a/0x730 net/ipv6/af_inet6.c:680 sock_recvmsg_nosec net/socket.c:1046 [inline] sock_recvmsg+0x109/0x280 net/socket.c:1068 _sysrecvmsg+0x1db/0x470 net/socket.c:2803 _sys_recvmsg net/socket.c:2845 [inline] do_recvmmsg+0x474/0xae0 net/socket.c:2939 __sys_recvmmsg net/socket.c:3018 [inline] __do_sys_recvmmsg net/socket.c:3041 [inline] __se_sys_recvmmsg net/socket.c:3034 [inline] __x64_sys_recvmmsg+0x199/0x250 net/socket.c:3034 do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:52 [inline] do_syscall_64+0xf5/0x240 arch/x86/entry/common.c:83 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f RIP: 0033:0x7faeb6363db9 Code: 28 00 00 00 75 05 48 83 c4 28 c3 e8 c1 17 00 00 90 48 89 f8 48 89 f7 48 89 d6 48 89 ca 4d 89 c2 4d 89 c8 4c 8b 4c 24 08 0f 05 <48> 3d 01 f0 ff ff 73 01 c3 48 c7 c1 b8 ff ff ff f7 d8 64 89 01 48 RSP: 002b:00007ffcc1997168 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 000000000000012b RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 0000000000000000 RCX: 00007faeb6363db9 RDX: 0000000000000001 RSI: 0000000020000bc0 RDI: 0000000000000005 RBP: 0000000000000000 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 000000000000001c R10: 0000000000000122 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 0000000000000000 R13: 0000000000000000 R14: 0000000000000001 R15: 0000000000000001(CVE-2024-36905)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
scsi: bnx2fc: Remove spin_lock_bh while releasing resources after upload
The session resources are used by FW and driver when session is offloaded, once session is uploaded these resources are not used. The lock is not required as these fields won't be used any longer. The offload and upload calls are sequential, hence lock is not required.
This will suppress following BUG_ON():
[ 449.843143] ------------[ cut here ]------------ [ 449.848302] kernel BUG at mm/vmalloc.c:2727! [ 449.853072] invalid opcode: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP PTI [ 449.858712] CPU: 5 PID: 1996 Comm: kworker/u24:2 Not tainted 5.14.0-118.el9.x86_64 #1 Rebooting. [ 449.867454] Hardware name: Dell Inc. PowerEdge R730/0WCJNT, BIOS 2.3.4 11/08/2016 [ 449.876966] Workqueue: fc_rport_eq fc_rport_work [libfc] [ 449.882910] RIP: 0010:vunmap+0x2e/0x30 [ 449.887098] Code: 00 65 8b 05 14 a2 f0 4a a9 00 ff ff 00 75 1b 55 48 89 fd e8 34 36 79 00 48 85 ed 74 0b 48 89 ef 31 f6 5d e9 14 fc ff ff 5d c3 <0f> 0b 0f 1f 44 00 00 41 57 41 56 49 89 ce 41 55 49 89 fd 41 54 41 [ 449.908054] RSP: 0018:ffffb83d878b3d68 EFLAGS: 00010206 [ 449.913887] RAX: 0000000080000201 RBX: ffff8f4355133550 RCX: 000000000d400005 [ 449.921843] RDX: 0000000000000001 RSI: 0000000000001000 RDI: ffffb83da53f5000 [ 449.929808] RBP: ffff8f4ac6675800 R08: ffffb83d878b3d30 R09: 00000000000efbdf [ 449.937774] R10: 0000000000000003 R11: ffff8f434573e000 R12: 0000000000001000 [ 449.945736] R13: 0000000000001000 R14: ffffb83da53f5000 R15: ffff8f43d4ea3ae0 [ 449.953701] FS: 0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff8f529fc80000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 [ 449.962732] CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 [ 449.969138] CR2: 00007f8cf993e150 CR3: 0000000efbe10003 CR4: 00000000003706e0 [ 449.977102] DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000 [ 449.985065] DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400 [ 449.993028] Call Trace: [ 449.995756] __iommu_dma_free+0x96/0x100 [ 450.000139] bnx2fc_free_session_resc+0x67/0x240 [bnx2fc] [ 450.006171] bnx2fc_upload_session+0xce/0x100 [bnx2fc] [ 450.011910] bnx2fc_rport_event_handler+0x9f/0x240 [bnx2fc] [ 450.018136] fc_rport_work+0x103/0x5b0 [libfc] [ 450.023103] process_one_work+0x1e8/0x3c0 [ 450.027581] worker_thread+0x50/0x3b0 [ 450.031669] ? rescuer_thread+0x370/0x370 [ 450.036143] kthread+0x149/0x170 [ 450.039744] ? set_kthread_struct+0x40/0x40 [ 450.044411] ret_from_fork+0x22/0x30 [ 450.048404] Modules linked in: vfat msdos fat xfs nfs_layout_nfsv41_files rpcsec_gss_krb5 auth_rpcgss nfsv4 dns_resolver dm_service_time qedf qed crc8 bnx2fc libfcoe libfc scsi_transport_fc intel_rapl_msr intel_rapl_common x86_pkg_temp_thermal intel_powerclamp dcdbas rapl intel_cstate intel_uncore mei_me pcspkr mei ipmi_ssif lpc_ich ipmi_si fuse zram ext4 mbcache jbd2 loop nfsv3 nfs_acl nfs lockd grace fscache netfs irdma ice sd_mod t10_pi sg ib_uverbs ib_core 8021q garp mrp stp llc mgag200 i2c_algo_bit drm_kms_helper syscopyarea sysfillrect sysimgblt mxm_wmi fb_sys_fops cec crct10dif_pclmul ahci crc32_pclmul bnx2x drm ghash_clmulni_intel libahci rfkill i40e libata megaraid_sas mdio wmi sunrpc lrw dm_crypt dm_round_robin dm_multipath dm_snapshot dm_bufio dm_mirror dm_region_hash dm_log dm_zero dm_mod linear raid10 raid456 async_raid6_recov async_memcpy async_pq async_xor async_tx raid6_pq libcrc32c crc32c_intel raid1 raid0 iscsi_ibft squashfs be2iscsi bnx2i cnic uio cxgb4i cxgb4 tls [ 450.048497] libcxgbi libcxgb qla4xxx iscsi_boot_sysfs iscsi_tcp libiscsi_tcp libiscsi scsi_transport_iscsi edd ipmi_devintf ipmi_msghandler [ 450.159753] ---[ end trace 712de2c57c64abc8 ]---(CVE-2024-36919)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
bna: ensure the copied buf is NUL terminated
Currently, we allocate a nbytes-sized kernel buffer and copy nbytes from userspace to that buffer. Later, we use sscanf on this buffer but we don't ensure that the string is terminated inside the buffer, this can lead to OOB read when using sscanf. Fix this issue by using memdup_user_nul instead of memdup_user.(CVE-2024-36934)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
scsi: lpfc: Move NPIV's transport unregistration to after resource clean up
There are cases after NPIV deletion where the fabric switch still believes the NPIV is logged into the fabric. This occurs when a vport is unregistered before the Remove All DA_ID CT and LOGO ELS are sent to the fabric.
Currently fc_remove_host(), which calls dev_loss_tmo for all D_IDs including the fabric D_ID, removes the last ndlp reference and frees the ndlp rport object. This sometimes causes the race condition where the final DA_ID and LOGO are skipped from being sent to the fabric switch.
Fix by moving the fc_remove_host() and scsi_remove_host() calls after DA_ID and LOGO are sent.(CVE-2024-36952)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
drm/vmwgfx: Fix invalid reads in fence signaled events
Correctly set the length of the drm_event to the size of the structure that's actually used.
The length of the drm_event was set to the parent structure instead of to the drm_vmw_event_fence which is supposed to be read. drm_read uses the length parameter to copy the event to the user space thus resuling in oob reads.(CVE-2024-36960)
{
"affected": [
{
"ecosystem_specific": {
"aarch64": [
"python3-perf-4.19.90-2406.3.0.0282.oe2003sp4.aarch64.rpm",
"bpftool-4.19.90-2406.3.0.0282.oe2003sp4.aarch64.rpm",
"python2-perf-debuginfo-4.19.90-2406.3.0.0282.oe2003sp4.aarch64.rpm",
"kernel-tools-4.19.90-2406.3.0.0282.oe2003sp4.aarch64.rpm",
"kernel-4.19.90-2406.3.0.0282.oe2003sp4.aarch64.rpm",
"kernel-devel-4.19.90-2406.3.0.0282.oe2003sp4.aarch64.rpm",
"perf-4.19.90-2406.3.0.0282.oe2003sp4.aarch64.rpm",
"kernel-tools-devel-4.19.90-2406.3.0.0282.oe2003sp4.aarch64.rpm",
"perf-debuginfo-4.19.90-2406.3.0.0282.oe2003sp4.aarch64.rpm",
"python3-perf-debuginfo-4.19.90-2406.3.0.0282.oe2003sp4.aarch64.rpm",
"kernel-tools-debuginfo-4.19.90-2406.3.0.0282.oe2003sp4.aarch64.rpm",
"kernel-debugsource-4.19.90-2406.3.0.0282.oe2003sp4.aarch64.rpm",
"python2-perf-4.19.90-2406.3.0.0282.oe2003sp4.aarch64.rpm",
"kernel-source-4.19.90-2406.3.0.0282.oe2003sp4.aarch64.rpm",
"kernel-debuginfo-4.19.90-2406.3.0.0282.oe2003sp4.aarch64.rpm",
"bpftool-debuginfo-4.19.90-2406.3.0.0282.oe2003sp4.aarch64.rpm"
],
"src": [
"kernel-4.19.90-2406.3.0.0282.oe2003sp4.src.rpm"
],
"x86_64": [
"python3-perf-debuginfo-4.19.90-2406.3.0.0282.oe2003sp4.x86_64.rpm",
"kernel-tools-devel-4.19.90-2406.3.0.0282.oe2003sp4.x86_64.rpm",
"kernel-4.19.90-2406.3.0.0282.oe2003sp4.x86_64.rpm",
"kernel-debugsource-4.19.90-2406.3.0.0282.oe2003sp4.x86_64.rpm",
"kernel-tools-4.19.90-2406.3.0.0282.oe2003sp4.x86_64.rpm",
"perf-debuginfo-4.19.90-2406.3.0.0282.oe2003sp4.x86_64.rpm",
"perf-4.19.90-2406.3.0.0282.oe2003sp4.x86_64.rpm",
"bpftool-4.19.90-2406.3.0.0282.oe2003sp4.x86_64.rpm",
"kernel-devel-4.19.90-2406.3.0.0282.oe2003sp4.x86_64.rpm",
"python2-perf-4.19.90-2406.3.0.0282.oe2003sp4.x86_64.rpm",
"python2-perf-debuginfo-4.19.90-2406.3.0.0282.oe2003sp4.x86_64.rpm",
"python3-perf-4.19.90-2406.3.0.0282.oe2003sp4.x86_64.rpm",
"kernel-tools-debuginfo-4.19.90-2406.3.0.0282.oe2003sp4.x86_64.rpm",
"kernel-debuginfo-4.19.90-2406.3.0.0282.oe2003sp4.x86_64.rpm",
"kernel-source-4.19.90-2406.3.0.0282.oe2003sp4.x86_64.rpm",
"bpftool-debuginfo-4.19.90-2406.3.0.0282.oe2003sp4.x86_64.rpm"
]
},
"package": {
"ecosystem": "openEuler:20.03-LTS-SP4",
"name": "kernel",
"purl": "pkg:rpm/openEuler/kernel\u0026distro=openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "0"
},
{
"fixed": "4.19.90-2406.3.0.0282.oe2003sp4"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
}
],
"database_specific": {
"severity": "High"
},
"details": "The Linux Kernel, the operating system core itself.\r\n\r\nSecurity Fix(es):\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nPCI: aardvark: Fix kernel panic during PIO transfer\r\n\r\nTrying to start a new PIO transfer by writing value 0 in PIO_START register\nwhen previous transfer has not yet completed (which is indicated by value 1\nin PIO_START) causes an External Abort on CPU, which results in kernel\npanic:\r\n\r\n SError Interrupt on CPU0, code 0xbf000002 -- SError\n Kernel panic - not syncing: Asynchronous SError Interrupt\r\n\r\nTo prevent kernel panic, it is required to reject a new PIO transfer when\nprevious one has not finished yet.\r\n\r\nIf previous PIO transfer is not finished yet, the kernel may issue a new\nPIO request only if the previous PIO transfer timed out.\r\n\r\nIn the past the root cause of this issue was incorrectly identified (as it\noften happens during link retraining or after link down event) and special\nhack was implemented in Trusted Firmware to catch all SError events in EL3,\nto ignore errors with code 0xbf000002 and not forwarding any other errors\nto kernel and instead throw panic from EL3 Trusted Firmware handler.\r\n\r\nLinks to discussion and patches about this issue:\nhttps://git.trustedfirmware.org/TF-A/trusted-firmware-a.git/commit/?id=3c7dcdac5c50\nhttps://lore.kernel.org/linux-pci/20190316161243.29517-1-repk@triplefau.lt/\nhttps://lore.kernel.org/linux-pci/971be151d24312cc533989a64bd454b4@www.loen.fr/\nhttps://review.trustedfirmware.org/c/TF-A/trusted-firmware-a/+/1541\r\n\r\nBut the real cause was the fact that during link retraining or after link\ndown event the PIO transfer may take longer time, up to the 1.44s until it\ntimes out. This increased probability that a new PIO transfer would be\nissued by kernel while previous one has not finished yet.\r\n\r\nAfter applying this change into the kernel, it is possible to revert the\nmentioned TF-A hack and SError events do not have to be caught in TF-A EL3.(CVE-2021-47229)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nphy: phy-mtk-tphy: Fix some resource leaks in mtk_phy_init()\r\n\r\nUse clk_disable_unprepare() in the error path of mtk_phy_init() to fix\nsome resource leaks.(CVE-2021-47234)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nnet: rds: fix memory leak in rds_recvmsg\r\n\r\nSyzbot reported memory leak in rds. The problem\nwas in unputted refcount in case of error.\r\n\r\nint rds_recvmsg(struct socket *sock, struct msghdr *msg, size_t size,\n\t\tint msg_flags)\n{\n...\r\n\r\n\tif (!rds_next_incoming(rs, \u0026amp;inc)) {\n\t\t...\n\t}\r\n\r\nAfter this \u0026quot;if\u0026quot; inc refcount incremented and\r\n\r\n\tif (rds_cmsg_recv(inc, msg, rs)) {\n\t\tret = -EFAULT;\n\t\tgoto out;\n\t}\n...\nout:\n\treturn ret;\n}\r\n\r\nin case of rds_cmsg_recv() fail the refcount won\u0026apos;t be\ndecremented. And it\u0026apos;s easy to see from ftrace log, that\nrds_inc_addref() don\u0026apos;t have rds_inc_put() pair in\nrds_recvmsg() after rds_cmsg_recv()\r\n\r\n 1) | rds_recvmsg() {\n 1) 3.721 us | rds_inc_addref();\n 1) 3.853 us | rds_message_inc_copy_to_user();\n 1) + 10.395 us | rds_cmsg_recv();\n 1) + 34.260 us | }(CVE-2021-47249)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nnet: ieee802154: fix null deref in parse dev addr\r\n\r\nFix a logic error that could result in a null deref if the user sets\nthe mode incorrectly for the given addr type.(CVE-2021-47257)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nusb: fix various gadget panics on 10gbps cabling\r\n\r\nusb_assign_descriptors() is called with 5 parameters,\nthe last 4 of which are the usb_descriptor_header for:\n full-speed (USB1.1 - 12Mbps [including USB1.0 low-speed @ 1.5Mbps),\n high-speed (USB2.0 - 480Mbps),\n super-speed (USB3.0 - 5Gbps),\n super-speed-plus (USB3.1 - 10Gbps).\r\n\r\nThe differences between full/high/super-speed descriptors are usually\nsubstantial (due to changes in the maximum usb block size from 64 to 512\nto 1024 bytes and other differences in the specs), while the difference\nbetween 5 and 10Gbps descriptors may be as little as nothing\n(in many cases the same tuning is simply good enough).\r\n\r\nHowever if a gadget driver calls usb_assign_descriptors() with\na NULL descriptor for super-speed-plus and is then used on a max 10gbps\nconfiguration, the kernel will crash with a null pointer dereference,\nwhen a 10gbps capable device port + cable + host port combination shows up.\n(This wouldn\u0026apos;t happen if the gadget max-speed was set to 5gbps, but\nit of course defaults to the maximum, and there\u0026apos;s no real reason to\nartificially limit it)\r\n\r\nThe fix is to simply use the 5gbps descriptor as the 10gbps descriptor,\nif a 10gbps descriptor wasn\u0026apos;t provided.\r\n\r\nObviously this won\u0026apos;t fix the problem if the 5gbps descriptor is also\nNULL, but such cases can\u0026apos;t be so trivially solved (and any such gadgets\nare unlikely to be used with USB3 ports any way).(CVE-2021-47267)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nALSA: seq: Fix race of snd_seq_timer_open()\r\n\r\nThe timer instance per queue is exclusive, and snd_seq_timer_open()\nshould have managed the concurrent accesses. It looks as if it\u0026apos;s\nchecking the already existing timer instance at the beginning, but\nit\u0026apos;s not right, because there is no protection, hence any later\nconcurrent call of snd_seq_timer_open() may override the timer\ninstance easily. This may result in UAF, as the leftover timer\ninstance can keep running while the queue itself gets closed, as\nspotted by syzkaller recently.\r\n\r\nFor avoiding the race, add a proper check at the assignment of\ntmr-\u0026gt;timeri again, and return -EBUSY if it\u0026apos;s been already registered.(CVE-2021-47281)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nigb: Fix use-after-free error during reset\r\n\r\nCleans the next descriptor to watch (next_to_watch) when cleaning the\nTX ring.\r\n\r\nFailure to do so can cause invalid memory accesses. If igb_poll() runs\nwhile the controller is reset this can lead to the driver try to free\na skb that was already freed.\r\n\r\n(The crash is harder to reproduce with the igb driver, but the same\npotential problem exists as the code is identical to igc)(CVE-2021-47301)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nnet: ti: fix UAF in tlan_remove_one\r\n\r\npriv is netdev private data and it cannot be\nused after free_netdev() call. Using priv after free_netdev()\ncan cause UAF bug. Fix it by moving free_netdev() at the end of the\nfunction.(CVE-2021-47310)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nwatchdog: Fix possible use-after-free by calling del_timer_sync()\r\n\r\nThis driver\u0026apos;s remove path calls del_timer(). However, that function\ndoes not wait until the timer handler finishes. This means that the\ntimer handler may still be running after the driver\u0026apos;s remove function\nhas finished, which would result in a use-after-free.\r\n\r\nFix by calling del_timer_sync(), which makes sure the timer handler\nhas finished, and unable to re-schedule itself.(CVE-2021-47321)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nmisc/libmasm/module: Fix two use after free in ibmasm_init_one\r\n\r\nIn ibmasm_init_one, it calls ibmasm_init_remote_input_dev().\nInside ibmasm_init_remote_input_dev, mouse_dev and keybd_dev are\nallocated by input_allocate_device(), and assigned to\nsp-\u0026gt;remote.mouse_dev and sp-\u0026gt;remote.keybd_dev respectively.\r\n\r\nIn the err_free_devices error branch of ibmasm_init_one,\nmouse_dev and keybd_dev are freed by input_free_device(), and return\nerror. Then the execution runs into error_send_message error branch\nof ibmasm_init_one, where ibmasm_free_remote_input_dev(sp) is called\nto unregister the freed sp-\u0026gt;remote.mouse_dev and sp-\u0026gt;remote.keybd_dev.\r\n\r\nMy patch add a \u0026quot;error_init_remote\u0026quot; label to handle the error of\nibmasm_init_remote_input_dev(), to avoid the uaf bugs.(CVE-2021-47334)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nmedia: zr364xx: fix memory leak in zr364xx_start_readpipe\r\n\r\nsyzbot reported memory leak in zr364xx driver.\nThe problem was in non-freed urb in case of\nusb_submit_urb() fail.\r\n\r\nbacktrace:\n [\u0026lt;ffffffff82baedf6\u0026gt;] kmalloc include/linux/slab.h:561 [inline]\n [\u0026lt;ffffffff82baedf6\u0026gt;] usb_alloc_urb+0x66/0xe0 drivers/usb/core/urb.c:74\n [\u0026lt;ffffffff82f7cce8\u0026gt;] zr364xx_start_readpipe+0x78/0x130 drivers/media/usb/zr364xx/zr364xx.c:1022\n [\u0026lt;ffffffff84251dfc\u0026gt;] zr364xx_board_init drivers/media/usb/zr364xx/zr364xx.c:1383 [inline]\n [\u0026lt;ffffffff84251dfc\u0026gt;] zr364xx_probe+0x6a3/0x851 drivers/media/usb/zr364xx/zr364xx.c:1516\n [\u0026lt;ffffffff82bb6507\u0026gt;] usb_probe_interface+0x177/0x370 drivers/usb/core/driver.c:396\n [\u0026lt;ffffffff826018a9\u0026gt;] really_probe+0x159/0x500 drivers/base/dd.c:576(CVE-2021-47344)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\ndrm/sched: Avoid data corruptions\r\n\r\nWait for all dependencies of a job to complete before\nkilling it to avoid data corruptions.(CVE-2021-47354)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nnet: macb: fix use after free on rmmod\r\n\r\nplat_dev-\u0026gt;dev-\u0026gt;platform_data is released by platform_device_unregister(),\nuse of pclk and hclk is a use-after-free. Since device unregister won\u0026apos;t\nneed a clk device we adjust the function call sequence to fix this issue.\r\n\r\n[ 31.261225] BUG: KASAN: use-after-free in macb_remove+0x77/0xc6 [macb_pci]\n[ 31.275563] Freed by task 306:\n[ 30.276782] platform_device_release+0x25/0x80(CVE-2021-47372)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\ni2c: acpi: fix resource leak in reconfiguration device addition\r\n\r\nacpi_i2c_find_adapter_by_handle() calls bus_find_device() which takes a\nreference on the adapter which is never released which will result in a\nreference count leak and render the adapter unremovable. Make sure to\nput the adapter after creating the client in the same manner that we do\nfor OF.\r\n\r\n[wsa: fixed title](CVE-2021-47425)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nnet: encx24j600: check error in devm_regmap_init_encx24j600\r\n\r\ndevm_regmap_init may return error which caused by like out of memory,\nthis will results in null pointer dereference later when reading\nor writing register:\r\n\r\ngeneral protection fault in encx24j600_spi_probe\nKASAN: null-ptr-deref in range [0x0000000000000090-0x0000000000000097]\nCPU: 0 PID: 286 Comm: spi-encx24j600- Not tainted 5.15.0-rc2-00142-g9978db750e31-dirty #11 9c53a778c1306b1b02359f3c2bbedc0222cba652\nHardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.13.0-1ubuntu1.1 04/01/2014\nRIP: 0010:regcache_cache_bypass drivers/base/regmap/regcache.c:540\nCode: 54 41 89 f4 55 53 48 89 fb 48 83 ec 08 e8 26 94 a8 fe 48 8d bb a0 00 00 00 48 b8 00 00 00 00 00 fc ff df 48 89 fa 48 c1 ea 03 \u0026lt;80\u0026gt; 3c 02 00 0f 85 4a 03 00 00 4c 8d ab b0 00 00 00 48 8b ab a0 00\nRSP: 0018:ffffc900010476b8 EFLAGS: 00010207\nRAX: dffffc0000000000 RBX: fffffffffffffff4 RCX: 0000000000000000\nRDX: 0000000000000012 RSI: ffff888002de0000 RDI: 0000000000000094\nRBP: ffff888013c9a000 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: fffffbfff3f9cc6a\nR10: ffffc900010476e8 R11: fffffbfff3f9cc69 R12: 0000000000000001\nR13: 000000000000000a R14: ffff888013c9af54 R15: ffff888013c9ad08\nFS: 00007ffa984ab580(0000) GS:ffff88801fe00000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000\nCS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033\nCR2: 000055a6384136c8 CR3: 000000003bbe6003 CR4: 0000000000770ef0\nDR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000\nDR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400\nPKRU: 55555554\nCall Trace:\n encx24j600_spi_probe drivers/net/ethernet/microchip/encx24j600.c:459\n spi_probe drivers/spi/spi.c:397\n really_probe drivers/base/dd.c:517\n __driver_probe_device drivers/base/dd.c:751\n driver_probe_device drivers/base/dd.c:782\n __device_attach_driver drivers/base/dd.c:899\n bus_for_each_drv drivers/base/bus.c:427\n __device_attach drivers/base/dd.c:971\n bus_probe_device drivers/base/bus.c:487\n device_add drivers/base/core.c:3364\n __spi_add_device drivers/spi/spi.c:599\n spi_add_device drivers/spi/spi.c:641\n spi_new_device drivers/spi/spi.c:717\n new_device_store+0x18c/0x1f1 [spi_stub 4e02719357f1ff33f5a43d00630982840568e85e]\n dev_attr_store drivers/base/core.c:2074\n sysfs_kf_write fs/sysfs/file.c:139\n kernfs_fop_write_iter fs/kernfs/file.c:300\n new_sync_write fs/read_write.c:508 (discriminator 4)\n vfs_write fs/read_write.c:594\n ksys_write fs/read_write.c:648\n do_syscall_64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:50\n entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:113\r\n\r\nAdd error check in devm_regmap_init_encx24j600 to avoid this situation.(CVE-2021-47440)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\ncan: peak_pci: peak_pci_remove(): fix UAF\r\n\r\nWhen remove the module peek_pci, referencing \u0026apos;chan\u0026apos; again after\nreleasing \u0026apos;dev\u0026apos; will cause UAF.\r\n\r\nFix this by releasing \u0026apos;dev\u0026apos; later.\r\n\r\nThe following log reveals it:\r\n\r\n[ 35.961814 ] BUG: KASAN: use-after-free in peak_pci_remove+0x16f/0x270 [peak_pci]\n[ 35.963414 ] Read of size 8 at addr ffff888136998ee8 by task modprobe/5537\n[ 35.965513 ] Call Trace:\n[ 35.965718 ] dump_stack_lvl+0xa8/0xd1\n[ 35.966028 ] print_address_description+0x87/0x3b0\n[ 35.966420 ] kasan_report+0x172/0x1c0\n[ 35.966725 ] ? peak_pci_remove+0x16f/0x270 [peak_pci]\n[ 35.967137 ] ? trace_irq_enable_rcuidle+0x10/0x170\n[ 35.967529 ] ? peak_pci_remove+0x16f/0x270 [peak_pci]\n[ 35.967945 ] __asan_report_load8_noabort+0x14/0x20\n[ 35.968346 ] peak_pci_remove+0x16f/0x270 [peak_pci]\n[ 35.968752 ] pci_device_remove+0xa9/0x250(CVE-2021-47456)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nisdn: mISDN: Fix sleeping function called from invalid context\r\n\r\nThe driver can call card-\u0026gt;isac.release() function from an atomic\ncontext.\r\n\r\nFix this by calling this function after releasing the lock.\r\n\r\nThe following log reveals it:\r\n\r\n[ 44.168226 ] BUG: sleeping function called from invalid context at kernel/workqueue.c:3018\n[ 44.168941 ] in_atomic(): 1, irqs_disabled(): 1, non_block: 0, pid: 5475, name: modprobe\n[ 44.169574 ] INFO: lockdep is turned off.\n[ 44.169899 ] irq event stamp: 0\n[ 44.170160 ] hardirqs last enabled at (0): [\u0026lt;0000000000000000\u0026gt;] 0x0\n[ 44.170627 ] hardirqs last disabled at (0): [\u0026lt;ffffffff814209ed\u0026gt;] copy_process+0x132d/0x3e00\n[ 44.171240 ] softirqs last enabled at (0): [\u0026lt;ffffffff81420a1a\u0026gt;] copy_process+0x135a/0x3e00\n[ 44.171852 ] softirqs last disabled at (0): [\u0026lt;0000000000000000\u0026gt;] 0x0\n[ 44.172318 ] Preemption disabled at:\n[ 44.172320 ] [\u0026lt;ffffffffa009b0a9\u0026gt;] nj_release+0x69/0x500 [netjet]\n[ 44.174441 ] Call Trace:\n[ 44.174630 ] dump_stack_lvl+0xa8/0xd1\n[ 44.174912 ] dump_stack+0x15/0x17\n[ 44.175166 ] ___might_sleep+0x3a2/0x510\n[ 44.175459 ] ? nj_release+0x69/0x500 [netjet]\n[ 44.175791 ] __might_sleep+0x82/0xe0\n[ 44.176063 ] ? start_flush_work+0x20/0x7b0\n[ 44.176375 ] start_flush_work+0x33/0x7b0\n[ 44.176672 ] ? trace_irq_enable_rcuidle+0x85/0x170\n[ 44.177034 ] ? kasan_quarantine_put+0xaa/0x1f0\n[ 44.177372 ] ? kasan_quarantine_put+0xaa/0x1f0\n[ 44.177711 ] __flush_work+0x11a/0x1a0\n[ 44.177991 ] ? flush_work+0x20/0x20\n[ 44.178257 ] ? lock_release+0x13c/0x8f0\n[ 44.178550 ] ? __kasan_check_write+0x14/0x20\n[ 44.178872 ] ? do_raw_spin_lock+0x148/0x360\n[ 44.179187 ] ? read_lock_is_recursive+0x20/0x20\n[ 44.179530 ] ? __kasan_check_read+0x11/0x20\n[ 44.179846 ] ? do_raw_spin_unlock+0x55/0x900\n[ 44.180168 ] ? ____kasan_slab_free+0x116/0x140\n[ 44.180505 ] ? _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x41/0x60\n[ 44.180878 ] ? skb_queue_purge+0x1a3/0x1c0\n[ 44.181189 ] ? kfree+0x13e/0x290\n[ 44.181438 ] flush_work+0x17/0x20\n[ 44.181695 ] mISDN_freedchannel+0xe8/0x100\n[ 44.182006 ] isac_release+0x210/0x260 [mISDNipac]\n[ 44.182366 ] nj_release+0xf6/0x500 [netjet]\n[ 44.182685 ] nj_remove+0x48/0x70 [netjet]\n[ 44.182989 ] pci_device_remove+0xa9/0x250(CVE-2021-47468)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\ncomedi: vmk80xx: fix bulk-buffer overflow\r\n\r\nThe driver is using endpoint-sized buffers but must not assume that the\ntx and rx buffers are of equal size or a malicious device could overflow\nthe slab-allocated receive buffer when doing bulk transfers.(CVE-2021-47474)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nnet: batman-adv: fix error handling\r\n\r\nSyzbot reported ODEBUG warning in batadv_nc_mesh_free(). The problem was\nin wrong error handling in batadv_mesh_init().\r\n\r\nBefore this patch batadv_mesh_init() was calling batadv_mesh_free() in case\nof any batadv_*_init() calls failure. This approach may work well, when\nthere is some kind of indicator, which can tell which parts of batadv are\ninitialized; but there isn\u0026apos;t any.\r\n\r\nAll written above lead to cleaning up uninitialized fields. Even if we hide\nODEBUG warning by initializing bat_priv-\u0026gt;nc.work, syzbot was able to hit\nGPF in batadv_nc_purge_paths(), because hash pointer in still NULL. [1]\r\n\r\nTo fix these bugs we can unwind batadv_*_init() calls one by one.\nIt is good approach for 2 reasons: 1) It fixes bugs on error handling\npath 2) It improves the performance, since we won\u0026apos;t call unneeded\nbatadv_*_free() functions.\r\n\r\nSo, this patch makes all batadv_*_init() clean up all allocated memory\nbefore returning with an error to no call correspoing batadv_*_free()\nand open-codes batadv_mesh_free() with proper order to avoid touching\nuninitialized fields.(CVE-2021-47482)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nregmap: Fix possible double-free in regcache_rbtree_exit()\r\n\r\nIn regcache_rbtree_insert_to_block(), when \u0026apos;present\u0026apos; realloc failed,\nthe \u0026apos;blk\u0026apos; which is supposed to assign to \u0026apos;rbnode-\u0026gt;block\u0026apos; will be freed,\nso \u0026apos;rbnode-\u0026gt;block\u0026apos; points a freed memory, in the error handling path of\nregcache_rbtree_init(), \u0026apos;rbnode-\u0026gt;block\u0026apos; will be freed again in\nregcache_rbtree_exit(), KASAN will report double-free as follows:\r\n\r\nBUG: KASAN: double-free or invalid-free in kfree+0xce/0x390\nCall Trace:\n slab_free_freelist_hook+0x10d/0x240\n kfree+0xce/0x390\n regcache_rbtree_exit+0x15d/0x1a0\n regcache_rbtree_init+0x224/0x2c0\n regcache_init+0x88d/0x1310\n __regmap_init+0x3151/0x4a80\n __devm_regmap_init+0x7d/0x100\n madera_spi_probe+0x10f/0x333 [madera_spi]\n spi_probe+0x183/0x210\n really_probe+0x285/0xc30\r\n\r\nTo fix this, moving up the assignment of rbnode-\u0026gt;block to immediately after\nthe reallocation has succeeded so that the data structure stays valid even\nif the second reallocation fails.(CVE-2021-47483)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nIB/qib: Protect from buffer overflow in struct qib_user_sdma_pkt fields\r\n\r\nOverflowing either addrlimit or bytes_togo can allow userspace to trigger\na buffer overflow of kernel memory. Check for overflows in all the places\ndoing math on user controlled buffers.(CVE-2021-47485)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nnet/tls: Fix flipped sign in tls_err_abort() calls\r\n\r\nsk-\u0026gt;sk_err appears to expect a positive value, a convention that ktls\ndoesn\u0026apos;t always follow and that leads to memory corruption in other code.\nFor instance,\r\n\r\n [kworker]\n tls_encrypt_done(..., err=\u0026lt;negative error from crypto request\u0026gt;)\n tls_err_abort(.., err)\n sk-\u0026gt;sk_err = err;\r\n\r\n [task]\n splice_from_pipe_feed\n ...\n tls_sw_do_sendpage\n if (sk-\u0026gt;sk_err) {\n ret = -sk-\u0026gt;sk_err; // ret is positive\r\n\r\n splice_from_pipe_feed (continued)\n ret = actor(...) // ret is still positive and interpreted as bytes\n // written, resulting in underflow of buf-\u0026gt;len and\n // sd-\u0026gt;len, leading to huge buf-\u0026gt;offset and bogus\n // addresses computed in later calls to actor()\r\n\r\nFix all tls_err_abort() callers to pass a negative error code\nconsistently and centralize the error-prone sign flip there, throwing in\na warning to catch future misuse and uninlining the function so it\nreally does only warn once.(CVE-2021-47496)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nALSA: pcm: oss: Limit the period size to 16MB\r\n\r\nSet the practical limit to the period size (the fragment shift in OSS)\ninstead of a full 31bit; a too large value could lead to the exhaust\nof memory as we allocate temporary buffers of the period size, too.\r\n\r\nAs of this patch, we set to 16MB limit, which should cover all use\ncases.(CVE-2021-47509)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nnfp: Fix memory leak in nfp_cpp_area_cache_add()\r\n\r\nIn line 800 (#1), nfp_cpp_area_alloc() allocates and initializes a\nCPP area structure. But in line 807 (#2), when the cache is allocated\nfailed, this CPP area structure is not freed, which will result in\nmemory leak.\r\n\r\nWe can fix it by freeing the CPP area when the cache is allocated\nfailed (#2).\r\n\r\n792 int nfp_cpp_area_cache_add(struct nfp_cpp *cpp, size_t size)\n793 {\n794 \tstruct nfp_cpp_area_cache *cache;\n795 \tstruct nfp_cpp_area *area;\r\n\r\n800\tarea = nfp_cpp_area_alloc(cpp, NFP_CPP_ID(7, NFP_CPP_ACTION_RW, 0),\n801 \t\t\t\t 0, size);\n\t// #1: allocates and initializes\r\n\r\n802 \tif (!area)\n803 \t\treturn -ENOMEM;\r\n\r\n805 \tcache = kzalloc(sizeof(*cache), GFP_KERNEL);\n806 \tif (!cache)\n807 \t\treturn -ENOMEM; // #2: missing free\r\n\r\n817\treturn 0;\n818 }(CVE-2021-47516)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nstaging: rtl8192e: Fix use after free in _rtl92e_pci_disconnect()\r\n\r\nThe free_rtllib() function frees the \u0026quot;dev\u0026quot; pointer so there is use\nafter free on the next line. Re-arrange things to avoid that.(CVE-2021-47571)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nsoc: brcmstb: pm-arm: Fix refcount leak and __iomem leak bugs\r\n\r\nIn brcmstb_pm_probe(), there are two kinds of leak bugs:\r\n\r\n(1) we need to add of_node_put() when for_each__matching_node() breaks\n(2) we need to add iounmap() for each iomap in fail path(CVE-2022-48693)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nmmc: mmc_spi: fix error handling in mmc_spi_probe()\r\n\r\nIf mmc_add_host() fails, it doesn\u0026apos;t need to call mmc_remove_host(),\nor it will cause null-ptr-deref, because of deleting a not added\ndevice in mmc_remove_host().\r\n\r\nTo fix this, goto label \u0026apos;fail_glue_init\u0026apos;, if mmc_add_host() fails,\nand change the label \u0026apos;fail_add_host\u0026apos; to \u0026apos;fail_gpiod_request\u0026apos;.(CVE-2023-52708)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nnet: USB: Fix wrong-direction WARNING in plusb.c\r\n\r\nThe syzbot fuzzer detected a bug in the plusb network driver: A\nzero-length control-OUT transfer was treated as a read instead of a\nwrite. In modern kernels this error provokes a WARNING:\r\n\r\nusb 1-1: BOGUS control dir, pipe 80000280 doesn\u0026apos;t match bRequestType c0\nWARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 4645 at drivers/usb/core/urb.c:411\nusb_submit_urb+0x14a7/0x1880 drivers/usb/core/urb.c:411\nModules linked in:\nCPU: 1 PID: 4645 Comm: dhcpcd Not tainted\n6.2.0-rc6-syzkaller-00050-g9f266ccaa2f5 #0\nHardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google\n01/12/2023\nRIP: 0010:usb_submit_urb+0x14a7/0x1880 drivers/usb/core/urb.c:411\n...\nCall Trace:\n \u0026lt;TASK\u0026gt;\n usb_start_wait_urb+0x101/0x4b0 drivers/usb/core/message.c:58\n usb_internal_control_msg drivers/usb/core/message.c:102 [inline]\n usb_control_msg+0x320/0x4a0 drivers/usb/core/message.c:153\n __usbnet_read_cmd+0xb9/0x390 drivers/net/usb/usbnet.c:2010\n usbnet_read_cmd+0x96/0xf0 drivers/net/usb/usbnet.c:2068\n pl_vendor_req drivers/net/usb/plusb.c:60 [inline]\n pl_set_QuickLink_features drivers/net/usb/plusb.c:75 [inline]\n pl_reset+0x2f/0xf0 drivers/net/usb/plusb.c:85\n usbnet_open+0xcc/0x5d0 drivers/net/usb/usbnet.c:889\n __dev_open+0x297/0x4d0 net/core/dev.c:1417\n __dev_change_flags+0x587/0x750 net/core/dev.c:8530\n dev_change_flags+0x97/0x170 net/core/dev.c:8602\n devinet_ioctl+0x15a2/0x1d70 net/ipv4/devinet.c:1147\n inet_ioctl+0x33f/0x380 net/ipv4/af_inet.c:979\n sock_do_ioctl+0xcc/0x230 net/socket.c:1169\n sock_ioctl+0x1f8/0x680 net/socket.c:1286\n vfs_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:51 [inline]\n __do_sys_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:870 [inline]\n __se_sys_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:856 [inline]\n __x64_sys_ioctl+0x197/0x210 fs/ioctl.c:856\n do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:50 [inline]\n do_syscall_64+0x39/0xb0 arch/x86/entry/common.c:80\n entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x63/0xcd\r\n\r\nThe fix is to call usbnet_write_cmd() instead of usbnet_read_cmd() and\nremove the USB_DIR_IN flag.(CVE-2023-52742)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nIB/hfi1: Restore allocated resources on failed copyout\r\n\r\nFix a resource leak if an error occurs.(CVE-2023-52747)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nmedia: gspca: cpia1: shift-out-of-bounds in set_flicker\r\n\r\nSyzkaller reported the following issue:\nUBSAN: shift-out-of-bounds in drivers/media/usb/gspca/cpia1.c:1031:27\nshift exponent 245 is too large for 32-bit type \u0026apos;int\u0026apos;\r\n\r\nWhen the value of the variable \u0026quot;sd-\u0026gt;params.exposure.gain\u0026quot; exceeds the\nnumber of bits in an integer, a shift-out-of-bounds error is reported. It\nis triggered because the variable \u0026quot;currentexp\u0026quot; cannot be left-shifted by\nmore than the number of bits in an integer. In order to avoid invalid\nrange during left-shift, the conditional expression is added.(CVE-2023-52764)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nfs/jfs: Add check for negative db_l2nbperpage\r\n\r\nl2nbperpage is log2(number of blks per page), and the minimum legal\nvalue should be 0, not negative.\r\n\r\nIn the case of l2nbperpage being negative, an error will occur\nwhen subsequently used as shift exponent.\r\n\r\nSyzbot reported this bug:\r\n\r\nUBSAN: shift-out-of-bounds in fs/jfs/jfs_dmap.c:799:12\nshift exponent -16777216 is negative(CVE-2023-52810)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nlocking/ww_mutex/test: Fix potential workqueue corruption\r\n\r\nIn some cases running with the test-ww_mutex code, I was seeing\nodd behavior where sometimes it seemed flush_workqueue was\nreturning before all the work threads were finished.\r\n\r\nOften this would cause strange crashes as the mutexes would be\nfreed while they were being used.\r\n\r\nLooking at the code, there is a lifetime problem as the\ncontrolling thread that spawns the work allocates the\n\u0026quot;struct stress\u0026quot; structures that are passed to the workqueue\nthreads. Then when the workqueue threads are finished,\nthey free the stress struct that was passed to them.\r\n\r\nUnfortunately the workqueue work_struct node is in the stress\nstruct. Which means the work_struct is freed before the work\nthread returns and while flush_workqueue is waiting.\r\n\r\nIt seems like a better idea to have the controlling thread\nboth allocate and free the stress structures, so that we can\nbe sure we don\u0026apos;t corrupt the workqueue by freeing the structure\nprematurely.\r\n\r\nSo this patch reworks the test to do so, and with this change\nI no longer see the early flush_workqueue returns.(CVE-2023-52836)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nllc: verify mac len before reading mac header\r\n\r\nLLC reads the mac header with eth_hdr without verifying that the skb\nhas an Ethernet header.\r\n\r\nSyzbot was able to enter llc_rcv on a tun device. Tun can insert\npackets without mac len and with user configurable skb-\u0026gt;protocol\n(passing a tun_pi header when not configuring IFF_NO_PI).\r\n\r\n BUG: KMSAN: uninit-value in llc_station_ac_send_test_r net/llc/llc_station.c:81 [inline]\n BUG: KMSAN: uninit-value in llc_station_rcv+0x6fb/0x1290 net/llc/llc_station.c:111\n llc_station_ac_send_test_r net/llc/llc_station.c:81 [inline]\n llc_station_rcv+0x6fb/0x1290 net/llc/llc_station.c:111\n llc_rcv+0xc5d/0x14a0 net/llc/llc_input.c:218\n __netif_receive_skb_one_core net/core/dev.c:5523 [inline]\n __netif_receive_skb+0x1a6/0x5a0 net/core/dev.c:5637\n netif_receive_skb_internal net/core/dev.c:5723 [inline]\n netif_receive_skb+0x58/0x660 net/core/dev.c:5782\n tun_rx_batched+0x3ee/0x980 drivers/net/tun.c:1555\n tun_get_user+0x54c5/0x69c0 drivers/net/tun.c:2002\r\n\r\nAdd a mac_len test before all three eth_hdr(skb) calls under net/llc.\r\n\r\nThere are further uses in include/net/llc_pdu.h. All these are\nprotected by a test skb-\u0026gt;protocol == ETH_P_802_2. Which does not\nprotect against this tun scenario.\r\n\r\nBut the mac_len test added in this patch in llc_fixup_skb will\nindirectly protect those too. That is called from llc_rcv before any\nother LLC code.\r\n\r\nIt is tempting to just add a blanket mac_len check in llc_rcv, but\nnot sure whether that could break valid LLC paths that do not assume\nan Ethernet header. 802.2 LLC may be used on top of non-802.3\nprotocols in principle. The below referenced commit shows that used\nto, on top of Token Ring.\r\n\r\nAt least one of the three eth_hdr uses goes back to before the start\nof git history. But the one that syzbot exercises is introduced in\nthis commit. That commit is old enough (2008), that effectively all\nstable kernels should receive this.(CVE-2023-52843)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nclk: mediatek: clk-mt2701: Add check for mtk_alloc_clk_data\r\n\r\nAdd the check for the return value of mtk_alloc_clk_data() in order to\navoid NULL pointer dereference.(CVE-2023-52875)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\ntty: n_gsm: require CAP_NET_ADMIN to attach N_GSM0710 ldisc\r\n\r\nAny unprivileged user can attach N_GSM0710 ldisc, but it requires\nCAP_NET_ADMIN to create a GSM network anyway.\r\n\r\nRequire initial namespace CAP_NET_ADMIN to do that.(CVE-2023-52880)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nnet/mlx5e: Prevent deadlock while disabling aRFS\r\n\r\nWhen disabling aRFS under the `priv-\u0026gt;state_lock`, any scheduled\naRFS works are canceled using the `cancel_work_sync` function,\nwhich waits for the work to end if it has already started.\nHowever, while waiting for the work handler, the handler will\ntry to acquire the `state_lock` which is already acquired.\r\n\r\nThe worker acquires the lock to delete the rules if the state\nis down, which is not the worker\u0026apos;s responsibility since\ndisabling aRFS deletes the rules.\r\n\r\nAdd an aRFS state variable, which indicates whether the aRFS is\nenabled and prevent adding rules when the aRFS is disabled.\r\n\r\nKernel log:\r\n\r\n======================================================\nWARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected\n6.7.0-rc4_net_next_mlx5_5483eb2 #1 Tainted: G I\n------------------------------------------------------\nethtool/386089 is trying to acquire lock:\nffff88810f21ce68 ((work_completion)(\u0026amp;rule-\u0026gt;arfs_work)){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: __flush_work+0x74/0x4e0\r\n\r\nbut task is already holding lock:\nffff8884a1808cc0 (\u0026amp;priv-\u0026gt;state_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: mlx5e_ethtool_set_channels+0x53/0x200 [mlx5_core]\r\n\r\nwhich lock already depends on the new lock.\r\n\r\nthe existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is:\r\n\r\n-\u0026gt; #1 (\u0026amp;priv-\u0026gt;state_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}:\n __mutex_lock+0x80/0xc90\n arfs_handle_work+0x4b/0x3b0 [mlx5_core]\n process_one_work+0x1dc/0x4a0\n worker_thread+0x1bf/0x3c0\n kthread+0xd7/0x100\n ret_from_fork+0x2d/0x50\n ret_from_fork_asm+0x11/0x20\r\n\r\n-\u0026gt; #0 ((work_completion)(\u0026amp;rule-\u0026gt;arfs_work)){+.+.}-{0:0}:\n __lock_acquire+0x17b4/0x2c80\n lock_acquire+0xd0/0x2b0\n __flush_work+0x7a/0x4e0\n __cancel_work_timer+0x131/0x1c0\n arfs_del_rules+0x143/0x1e0 [mlx5_core]\n mlx5e_arfs_disable+0x1b/0x30 [mlx5_core]\n mlx5e_ethtool_set_channels+0xcb/0x200 [mlx5_core]\n ethnl_set_channels+0x28f/0x3b0\n ethnl_default_set_doit+0xec/0x240\n genl_family_rcv_msg_doit+0xd0/0x120\n genl_rcv_msg+0x188/0x2c0\n netlink_rcv_skb+0x54/0x100\n genl_rcv+0x24/0x40\n netlink_unicast+0x1a1/0x270\n netlink_sendmsg+0x214/0x460\n __sock_sendmsg+0x38/0x60\n __sys_sendto+0x113/0x170\n __x64_sys_sendto+0x20/0x30\n do_syscall_64+0x40/0xe0\n entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x46/0x4e\r\n\r\nother info that might help us debug this:\r\n\r\n Possible unsafe locking scenario:\r\n\r\n CPU0 CPU1\n ---- ----\n lock(\u0026amp;priv-\u0026gt;state_lock);\n lock((work_completion)(\u0026amp;rule-\u0026gt;arfs_work));\n lock(\u0026amp;priv-\u0026gt;state_lock);\n lock((work_completion)(\u0026amp;rule-\u0026gt;arfs_work));\r\n\r\n *** DEADLOCK ***\r\n\r\n3 locks held by ethtool/386089:\n #0: ffffffff82ea7210 (cb_lock){++++}-{3:3}, at: genl_rcv+0x15/0x40\n #1: ffffffff82e94c88 (rtnl_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: ethnl_default_set_doit+0xd3/0x240\n #2: ffff8884a1808cc0 (\u0026amp;priv-\u0026gt;state_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: mlx5e_ethtool_set_channels+0x53/0x200 [mlx5_core]\r\n\r\nstack backtrace:\nCPU: 15 PID: 386089 Comm: ethtool Tainted: G I 6.7.0-rc4_net_next_mlx5_5483eb2 #1\nHardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), BIOS rel-1.13.0-0-gf21b5a4aeb02-prebuilt.qemu.org 04/01/2014\nCall Trace:\n \u0026lt;TASK\u0026gt;\n dump_stack_lvl+0x60/0xa0\n check_noncircular+0x144/0x160\n __lock_acquire+0x17b4/0x2c80\n lock_acquire+0xd0/0x2b0\n ? __flush_work+0x74/0x4e0\n ? save_trace+0x3e/0x360\n ? __flush_work+0x74/0x4e0\n __flush_work+0x7a/0x4e0\n ? __flush_work+0x74/0x4e0\n ? __lock_acquire+0xa78/0x2c80\n ? lock_acquire+0xd0/0x2b0\n ? mark_held_locks+0x49/0x70\n __cancel_work_timer+0x131/0x1c0\n ? mark_held_locks+0x49/0x70\n arfs_del_rules+0x143/0x1e0 [mlx5_core]\n mlx5e_arfs_disable+0x1b/0x30 [mlx5_core]\n mlx5e_ethtool_set_channels+0xcb/0x200 [mlx5_core]\n ethnl_set_channels+0x28f/0x3b0\n ethnl_default_set_doit+0xec/0x240\n genl_family_rcv_msg_doit+0xd0/0x120\n genl_rcv_msg+0x188/0x2c0\n ? ethn\n---truncated---(CVE-2024-27014)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nnetfilter: nf_tables: Fix potential data-race in __nft_obj_type_get()\r\n\r\nnft_unregister_obj() can concurrent with __nft_obj_type_get(),\nand there is not any protection when iterate over nf_tables_objects\nlist in __nft_obj_type_get(). Therefore, there is potential data-race\nof nf_tables_objects list entry.\r\n\r\nUse list_for_each_entry_rcu() to iterate over nf_tables_objects\nlist in __nft_obj_type_get(), and use rcu_read_lock() in the caller\nnft_obj_type_get() to protect the entire type query process.(CVE-2024-27019)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nphonet/pep: fix racy skb_queue_empty() use\r\n\r\nThe receive queues are protected by their respective spin-lock, not\nthe socket lock. This could lead to skb_peek() unexpectedly\nreturning NULL or a pointer to an already dequeued socket buffer.(CVE-2024-27402)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nsoc: fsl: qbman: Use raw spinlock for cgr_lock\r\n\r\nsmp_call_function always runs its callback in hard IRQ context, even on\nPREEMPT_RT, where spinlocks can sleep. So we need to use a raw spinlock\nfor cgr_lock to ensure we aren\u0026apos;t waiting on a sleeping task.\r\n\r\nAlthough this bug has existed for a while, it was not apparent until\ncommit ef2a8d5478b9 (\u0026quot;net: dpaa: Adjust queue depth on rate change\u0026quot;)\nwhich invokes smp_call_function_single via qman_update_cgr_safe every\ntime a link goes up or down.(CVE-2024-35819)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nubifs: Set page uptodate in the correct place\r\n\r\nPage cache reads are lockless, so setting the freshly allocated page\nuptodate before we\u0026apos;ve overwritten it with the data it\u0026apos;s supposed to have\nin it will allow a simultaneous reader to see old data. Move the call\nto SetPageUptodate into ubifs_write_end(), which is after we copied the\nnew data into the page.(CVE-2024-35821)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nwifi: libertas: fix some memleaks in lbs_allocate_cmd_buffer()\r\n\r\nIn the for statement of lbs_allocate_cmd_buffer(), if the allocation of\ncmdarray[i].cmdbuf fails, both cmdarray and cmdarray[i].cmdbuf needs to\nbe freed. Otherwise, there will be memleaks in lbs_allocate_cmd_buffer().(CVE-2024-35828)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\ntcp: properly terminate timers for kernel sockets\r\n\r\nWe had various syzbot reports about tcp timers firing after\nthe corresponding netns has been dismantled.\r\n\r\nFortunately Josef Bacik could trigger the issue more often,\nand could test a patch I wrote two years ago.\r\n\r\nWhen TCP sockets are closed, we call inet_csk_clear_xmit_timers()\nto \u0026apos;stop\u0026apos; the timers.\r\n\r\ninet_csk_clear_xmit_timers() can be called from any context,\nincluding when socket lock is held.\nThis is the reason it uses sk_stop_timer(), aka del_timer().\nThis means that ongoing timers might finish much later.\r\n\r\nFor user sockets, this is fine because each running timer\nholds a reference on the socket, and the user socket holds\na reference on the netns.\r\n\r\nFor kernel sockets, we risk that the netns is freed before\ntimer can complete, because kernel sockets do not hold\nreference on the netns.\r\n\r\nThis patch adds inet_csk_clear_xmit_timers_sync() function\nthat using sk_stop_timer_sync() to make sure all timers\nare terminated before the kernel socket is released.\nModules using kernel sockets close them in their netns exit()\nhandler.\r\n\r\nAlso add sock_not_owned_by_me() helper to get LOCKDEP\nsupport : inet_csk_clear_xmit_timers_sync() must not be called\nwhile socket lock is held.\r\n\r\nIt is very possible we can revert in the future commit\n3a58f13a881e (\u0026quot;net: rds: acquire refcount on TCP sockets\u0026quot;)\nwhich attempted to solve the issue in rds only.\n(net/smc/af_smc.c and net/mptcp/subflow.c have similar code)\r\n\r\nWe probably can remove the check_net() tests from\ntcp_out_of_resources() and __tcp_close() in the future.(CVE-2024-35910)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nbtrfs: send: handle path ref underflow in header iterate_inode_ref()\r\n\r\nChange BUG_ON to proper error handling if building the path buffer\nfails. The pointers are not printed so we don\u0026apos;t accidentally leak kernel\naddresses.(CVE-2024-35935)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nwifi: cfg80211: check A-MSDU format more carefully\r\n\r\nIf it looks like there\u0026apos;s another subframe in the A-MSDU\nbut the header isn\u0026apos;t fully there, we can end up reading\ndata out of bounds, only to discard later. Make this a\nbit more careful and check if the subframe header can\neven be present.(CVE-2024-35937)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\ndyndbg: fix old BUG_ON in \u0026gt;control parser\r\n\r\nFix a BUG_ON from 2009. Even if it looks \u0026quot;unreachable\u0026quot; (I didn\u0026apos;t\nreally look), lets make sure by removing it, doing pr_err and return\n-EINVAL instead.(CVE-2024-35947)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nbatman-adv: Avoid infinite loop trying to resize local TT\r\n\r\nIf the MTU of one of an attached interface becomes too small to transmit\nthe local translation table then it must be resized to fit inside all\nfragments (when enabled) or a single packet.\r\n\r\nBut if the MTU becomes too low to transmit even the header + the VLAN\nspecific part then the resizing of the local TT will never succeed. This\ncan for example happen when the usable space is 110 bytes and 11 VLANs are\non top of batman-adv. In this case, at least 116 byte would be needed.\nThere will just be an endless spam of\r\n\r\n batman_adv: batadv0: Forced to purge local tt entries to fit new maximum fragment MTU (110)\r\n\r\nin the log but the function will never finish. Problem here is that the\ntimeout will be halved all the time and will then stagnate at 0 and\ntherefore never be able to reduce the table even more.\r\n\r\nThere are other scenarios possible with a similar result. The number of\nBATADV_TT_CLIENT_NOPURGE entries in the local TT can for example be too\nhigh to fit inside a packet. Such a scenario can therefore happen also with\nonly a single VLAN + 7 non-purgable addresses - requiring at least 120\nbytes.\r\n\r\nWhile this should be handled proactively when:\r\n\r\n* interface with too low MTU is added\n* VLAN is added\n* non-purgeable local mac is added\n* MTU of an attached interface is reduced\n* fragmentation setting gets disabled (which most likely requires dropping\n attached interfaces)\r\n\r\nnot all of these scenarios can be prevented because batman-adv is only\nconsuming events without the the possibility to prevent these actions\n(non-purgable MAC address added, MTU of an attached interface is reduced).\nIt is therefore necessary to also make sure that the code is able to handle\nalso the situations when there were already incompatible system\nconfiguration are present.(CVE-2024-35982)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\ntty: n_gsm: fix possible out-of-bounds in gsm0_receive()\r\n\r\nAssuming the following:\n- side A configures the n_gsm in basic option mode\n- side B sends the header of a basic option mode frame with data length 1\n- side A switches to advanced option mode\n- side B sends 2 data bytes which exceeds gsm-\u0026gt;len\n Reason: gsm-\u0026gt;len is not used in advanced option mode.\n- side A switches to basic option mode\n- side B keeps sending until gsm0_receive() writes past gsm-\u0026gt;buf\n Reason: Neither gsm-\u0026gt;state nor gsm-\u0026gt;len have been reset after\n reconfiguration.\r\n\r\nFix this by changing gsm-\u0026gt;count to gsm-\u0026gt;len comparison from equal to less\nthan. Also add upper limit checks against the constant MAX_MRU in\ngsm0_receive() and gsm1_receive() to harden against memory corruption of\ngsm-\u0026gt;len and gsm-\u0026gt;mru.\r\n\r\nAll other checks remain as we still need to limit the data according to the\nuser configuration and actual payload size.(CVE-2024-36016)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\ntipc: fix UAF in error path\r\n\r\nSam Page (sam4k) working with Trend Micro Zero Day Initiative reported\na UAF in the tipc_buf_append() error path:\r\n\r\nBUG: KASAN: slab-use-after-free in kfree_skb_list_reason+0x47e/0x4c0\nlinux/net/core/skbuff.c:1183\nRead of size 8 at addr ffff88804d2a7c80 by task poc/8034\r\n\r\nCPU: 1 PID: 8034 Comm: poc Not tainted 6.8.2 #1\nHardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS\n1.16.0-debian-1.16.0-5 04/01/2014\nCall Trace:\n \u0026lt;IRQ\u0026gt;\n __dump_stack linux/lib/dump_stack.c:88\n dump_stack_lvl+0xd9/0x1b0 linux/lib/dump_stack.c:106\n print_address_description linux/mm/kasan/report.c:377\n print_report+0xc4/0x620 linux/mm/kasan/report.c:488\n kasan_report+0xda/0x110 linux/mm/kasan/report.c:601\n kfree_skb_list_reason+0x47e/0x4c0 linux/net/core/skbuff.c:1183\n skb_release_data+0x5af/0x880 linux/net/core/skbuff.c:1026\n skb_release_all linux/net/core/skbuff.c:1094\n __kfree_skb linux/net/core/skbuff.c:1108\n kfree_skb_reason+0x12d/0x210 linux/net/core/skbuff.c:1144\n kfree_skb linux/./include/linux/skbuff.h:1244\n tipc_buf_append+0x425/0xb50 linux/net/tipc/msg.c:186\n tipc_link_input+0x224/0x7c0 linux/net/tipc/link.c:1324\n tipc_link_rcv+0x76e/0x2d70 linux/net/tipc/link.c:1824\n tipc_rcv+0x45f/0x10f0 linux/net/tipc/node.c:2159\n tipc_udp_recv+0x73b/0x8f0 linux/net/tipc/udp_media.c:390\n udp_queue_rcv_one_skb+0xad2/0x1850 linux/net/ipv4/udp.c:2108\n udp_queue_rcv_skb+0x131/0xb00 linux/net/ipv4/udp.c:2186\n udp_unicast_rcv_skb+0x165/0x3b0 linux/net/ipv4/udp.c:2346\n __udp4_lib_rcv+0x2594/0x3400 linux/net/ipv4/udp.c:2422\n ip_protocol_deliver_rcu+0x30c/0x4e0 linux/net/ipv4/ip_input.c:205\n ip_local_deliver_finish+0x2e4/0x520 linux/net/ipv4/ip_input.c:233\n NF_HOOK linux/./include/linux/netfilter.h:314\n NF_HOOK linux/./include/linux/netfilter.h:308\n ip_local_deliver+0x18e/0x1f0 linux/net/ipv4/ip_input.c:254\n dst_input linux/./include/net/dst.h:461\n ip_rcv_finish linux/net/ipv4/ip_input.c:449\n NF_HOOK linux/./include/linux/netfilter.h:314\n NF_HOOK linux/./include/linux/netfilter.h:308\n ip_rcv+0x2c5/0x5d0 linux/net/ipv4/ip_input.c:569\n __netif_receive_skb_one_core+0x199/0x1e0 linux/net/core/dev.c:5534\n __netif_receive_skb+0x1f/0x1c0 linux/net/core/dev.c:5648\n process_backlog+0x101/0x6b0 linux/net/core/dev.c:5976\n __napi_poll.constprop.0+0xba/0x550 linux/net/core/dev.c:6576\n napi_poll linux/net/core/dev.c:6645\n net_rx_action+0x95a/0xe90 linux/net/core/dev.c:6781\n __do_softirq+0x21f/0x8e7 linux/kernel/softirq.c:553\n do_softirq linux/kernel/softirq.c:454\n do_softirq+0xb2/0xf0 linux/kernel/softirq.c:441\n \u0026lt;/IRQ\u0026gt;\n \u0026lt;TASK\u0026gt;\n __local_bh_enable_ip+0x100/0x120 linux/kernel/softirq.c:381\n local_bh_enable linux/./include/linux/bottom_half.h:33\n rcu_read_unlock_bh linux/./include/linux/rcupdate.h:851\n __dev_queue_xmit+0x871/0x3ee0 linux/net/core/dev.c:4378\n dev_queue_xmit linux/./include/linux/netdevice.h:3169\n neigh_hh_output linux/./include/net/neighbour.h:526\n neigh_output linux/./include/net/neighbour.h:540\n ip_finish_output2+0x169f/0x2550 linux/net/ipv4/ip_output.c:235\n __ip_finish_output linux/net/ipv4/ip_output.c:313\n __ip_finish_output+0x49e/0x950 linux/net/ipv4/ip_output.c:295\n ip_finish_output+0x31/0x310 linux/net/ipv4/ip_output.c:323\n NF_HOOK_COND linux/./include/linux/netfilter.h:303\n ip_output+0x13b/0x2a0 linux/net/ipv4/ip_output.c:433\n dst_output linux/./include/net/dst.h:451\n ip_local_out linux/net/ipv4/ip_output.c:129\n ip_send_skb+0x3e5/0x560 linux/net/ipv4/ip_output.c:1492\n udp_send_skb+0x73f/0x1530 linux/net/ipv4/udp.c:963\n udp_sendmsg+0x1a36/0x2b40 linux/net/ipv4/udp.c:1250\n inet_sendmsg+0x105/0x140 linux/net/ipv4/af_inet.c:850\n sock_sendmsg_nosec linux/net/socket.c:730\n __sock_sendmsg linux/net/socket.c:745\n __sys_sendto+0x42c/0x4e0 linux/net/socket.c:2191\n __do_sys_sendto linux/net/socket.c:2203\n __se_sys_sendto linux/net/socket.c:2199\n __x64_sys_sendto+0xe0/0x1c0 linux/net/socket.c:2199\n do_syscall_x64 linux/arch/x86/entry/common.c:52\n do_syscall_\n---truncated---(CVE-2024-36886)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nipv6: prevent NULL dereference in ip6_output()\r\n\r\nAccording to syzbot, there is a chance that ip6_dst_idev()\nreturns NULL in ip6_output(). Most places in IPv6 stack\ndeal with a NULL idev just fine, but not here.\r\n\r\nsyzbot reported:\r\n\r\ngeneral protection fault, probably for non-canonical address 0xdffffc00000000bc: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP KASAN PTI\nKASAN: null-ptr-deref in range [0x00000000000005e0-0x00000000000005e7]\nCPU: 0 PID: 9775 Comm: syz-executor.4 Not tainted 6.9.0-rc5-syzkaller-00157-g6a30653b604a #0\nHardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 03/27/2024\n RIP: 0010:ip6_output+0x231/0x3f0 net/ipv6/ip6_output.c:237\nCode: 3c 1e 00 49 89 df 74 08 4c 89 ef e8 19 58 db f7 48 8b 44 24 20 49 89 45 00 49 89 c5 48 8d 9d e0 05 00 00 48 89 d8 48 c1 e8 03 \u0026lt;42\u0026gt; 0f b6 04 38 84 c0 4c 8b 74 24 28 0f 85 61 01 00 00 8b 1b 31 ff\nRSP: 0018:ffffc9000927f0d8 EFLAGS: 00010202\nRAX: 00000000000000bc RBX: 00000000000005e0 RCX: 0000000000040000\nRDX: ffffc900131f9000 RSI: 0000000000004f47 RDI: 0000000000004f48\nRBP: 0000000000000000 R08: ffffffff8a1f0b9a R09: 1ffffffff1f51fad\nR10: dffffc0000000000 R11: fffffbfff1f51fae R12: ffff8880293ec8c0\nR13: ffff88805d7fc000 R14: 1ffff1100527d91a R15: dffffc0000000000\nFS: 00007f135c6856c0(0000) GS:ffff8880b9400000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000\nCS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033\nCR2: 0000000020000080 CR3: 0000000064096000 CR4: 00000000003506f0\nDR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000\nDR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400\nCall Trace:\n \u0026lt;TASK\u0026gt;\n NF_HOOK include/linux/netfilter.h:314 [inline]\n ip6_xmit+0xefe/0x17f0 net/ipv6/ip6_output.c:358\n sctp_v6_xmit+0x9f2/0x13f0 net/sctp/ipv6.c:248\n sctp_packet_transmit+0x26ad/0x2ca0 net/sctp/output.c:653\n sctp_packet_singleton+0x22c/0x320 net/sctp/outqueue.c:783\n sctp_outq_flush_ctrl net/sctp/outqueue.c:914 [inline]\n sctp_outq_flush+0x6d5/0x3e20 net/sctp/outqueue.c:1212\n sctp_side_effects net/sctp/sm_sideeffect.c:1198 [inline]\n sctp_do_sm+0x59cc/0x60c0 net/sctp/sm_sideeffect.c:1169\n sctp_primitive_ASSOCIATE+0x95/0xc0 net/sctp/primitive.c:73\n __sctp_connect+0x9cd/0xe30 net/sctp/socket.c:1234\n sctp_connect net/sctp/socket.c:4819 [inline]\n sctp_inet_connect+0x149/0x1f0 net/sctp/socket.c:4834\n __sys_connect_file net/socket.c:2048 [inline]\n __sys_connect+0x2df/0x310 net/socket.c:2065\n __do_sys_connect net/socket.c:2075 [inline]\n __se_sys_connect net/socket.c:2072 [inline]\n __x64_sys_connect+0x7a/0x90 net/socket.c:2072\n do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:52 [inline]\n do_syscall_64+0xf5/0x240 arch/x86/entry/common.c:83\n entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f(CVE-2024-36901)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\ntcp: defer shutdown(SEND_SHUTDOWN) for TCP_SYN_RECV sockets\r\n\r\nTCP_SYN_RECV state is really special, it is only used by\ncross-syn connections, mostly used by fuzzers.\r\n\r\nIn the following crash [1], syzbot managed to trigger a divide\nby zero in tcp_rcv_space_adjust()\r\n\r\nA socket makes the following state transitions,\nwithout ever calling tcp_init_transfer(),\nmeaning tcp_init_buffer_space() is also not called.\r\n\r\n TCP_CLOSE\nconnect()\n TCP_SYN_SENT\n TCP_SYN_RECV\nshutdown() -\u0026gt; tcp_shutdown(sk, SEND_SHUTDOWN)\n TCP_FIN_WAIT1\r\n\r\nTo fix this issue, change tcp_shutdown() to not\nperform a TCP_SYN_RECV -\u0026gt; TCP_FIN_WAIT1 transition,\nwhich makes no sense anyway.\r\n\r\nWhen tcp_rcv_state_process() later changes socket state\nfrom TCP_SYN_RECV to TCP_ESTABLISH, then look at\nsk-\u0026gt;sk_shutdown to finally enter TCP_FIN_WAIT1 state,\nand send a FIN packet from a sane socket state.\r\n\r\nThis means tcp_send_fin() can now be called from BH\ncontext, and must use GFP_ATOMIC allocations.\r\n\r\n[1]\ndivide error: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP KASAN NOPTI\nCPU: 1 PID: 5084 Comm: syz-executor358 Not tainted 6.9.0-rc6-syzkaller-00022-g98369dccd2f8 #0\nHardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 03/27/2024\n RIP: 0010:tcp_rcv_space_adjust+0x2df/0x890 net/ipv4/tcp_input.c:767\nCode: e3 04 4c 01 eb 48 8b 44 24 38 0f b6 04 10 84 c0 49 89 d5 0f 85 a5 03 00 00 41 8b 8e c8 09 00 00 89 e8 29 c8 48 0f af c3 31 d2 \u0026lt;48\u0026gt; f7 f1 48 8d 1c 43 49 8d 96 76 08 00 00 48 89 d0 48 c1 e8 03 48\nRSP: 0018:ffffc900031ef3f0 EFLAGS: 00010246\nRAX: 0c677a10441f8f42 RBX: 000000004fb95e7e RCX: 0000000000000000\nRDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 0000000000000000 RDI: 0000000000000000\nRBP: 0000000027d4b11f R08: ffffffff89e535a4 R09: 1ffffffff25e6ab7\nR10: dffffc0000000000 R11: ffffffff8135e920 R12: ffff88802a9f8d30\nR13: dffffc0000000000 R14: ffff88802a9f8d00 R15: 1ffff1100553f2da\nFS: 00005555775c0380(0000) GS:ffff8880b9500000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000\nCS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033\nCR2: 00007f1155bf2304 CR3: 000000002b9f2000 CR4: 0000000000350ef0\nCall Trace:\n \u0026lt;TASK\u0026gt;\n tcp_recvmsg_locked+0x106d/0x25a0 net/ipv4/tcp.c:2513\n tcp_recvmsg+0x25d/0x920 net/ipv4/tcp.c:2578\n inet6_recvmsg+0x16a/0x730 net/ipv6/af_inet6.c:680\n sock_recvmsg_nosec net/socket.c:1046 [inline]\n sock_recvmsg+0x109/0x280 net/socket.c:1068\n ____sys_recvmsg+0x1db/0x470 net/socket.c:2803\n ___sys_recvmsg net/socket.c:2845 [inline]\n do_recvmmsg+0x474/0xae0 net/socket.c:2939\n __sys_recvmmsg net/socket.c:3018 [inline]\n __do_sys_recvmmsg net/socket.c:3041 [inline]\n __se_sys_recvmmsg net/socket.c:3034 [inline]\n __x64_sys_recvmmsg+0x199/0x250 net/socket.c:3034\n do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:52 [inline]\n do_syscall_64+0xf5/0x240 arch/x86/entry/common.c:83\n entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f\nRIP: 0033:0x7faeb6363db9\nCode: 28 00 00 00 75 05 48 83 c4 28 c3 e8 c1 17 00 00 90 48 89 f8 48 89 f7 48 89 d6 48 89 ca 4d 89 c2 4d 89 c8 4c 8b 4c 24 08 0f 05 \u0026lt;48\u0026gt; 3d 01 f0 ff ff 73 01 c3 48 c7 c1 b8 ff ff ff f7 d8 64 89 01 48\nRSP: 002b:00007ffcc1997168 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 000000000000012b\nRAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 0000000000000000 RCX: 00007faeb6363db9\nRDX: 0000000000000001 RSI: 0000000020000bc0 RDI: 0000000000000005\nRBP: 0000000000000000 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 000000000000001c\nR10: 0000000000000122 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 0000000000000000\nR13: 0000000000000000 R14: 0000000000000001 R15: 0000000000000001(CVE-2024-36905)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nscsi: bnx2fc: Remove spin_lock_bh while releasing resources after upload\r\n\r\nThe session resources are used by FW and driver when session is offloaded,\nonce session is uploaded these resources are not used. The lock is not\nrequired as these fields won\u0026apos;t be used any longer. The offload and upload\ncalls are sequential, hence lock is not required.\r\n\r\nThis will suppress following BUG_ON():\r\n\r\n[ 449.843143] ------------[ cut here ]------------\n[ 449.848302] kernel BUG at mm/vmalloc.c:2727!\n[ 449.853072] invalid opcode: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP PTI\n[ 449.858712] CPU: 5 PID: 1996 Comm: kworker/u24:2 Not tainted 5.14.0-118.el9.x86_64 #1\nRebooting.\n[ 449.867454] Hardware name: Dell Inc. PowerEdge R730/0WCJNT, BIOS 2.3.4 11/08/2016\n[ 449.876966] Workqueue: fc_rport_eq fc_rport_work [libfc]\n[ 449.882910] RIP: 0010:vunmap+0x2e/0x30\n[ 449.887098] Code: 00 65 8b 05 14 a2 f0 4a a9 00 ff ff 00 75 1b 55 48 89 fd e8 34 36 79 00 48 85 ed 74 0b 48 89 ef 31 f6 5d e9 14 fc ff ff 5d c3 \u0026lt;0f\u0026gt; 0b 0f 1f 44 00 00 41 57 41 56 49 89 ce 41 55 49 89 fd 41 54 41\n[ 449.908054] RSP: 0018:ffffb83d878b3d68 EFLAGS: 00010206\n[ 449.913887] RAX: 0000000080000201 RBX: ffff8f4355133550 RCX: 000000000d400005\n[ 449.921843] RDX: 0000000000000001 RSI: 0000000000001000 RDI: ffffb83da53f5000\n[ 449.929808] RBP: ffff8f4ac6675800 R08: ffffb83d878b3d30 R09: 00000000000efbdf\n[ 449.937774] R10: 0000000000000003 R11: ffff8f434573e000 R12: 0000000000001000\n[ 449.945736] R13: 0000000000001000 R14: ffffb83da53f5000 R15: ffff8f43d4ea3ae0\n[ 449.953701] FS: 0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff8f529fc80000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000\n[ 449.962732] CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033\n[ 449.969138] CR2: 00007f8cf993e150 CR3: 0000000efbe10003 CR4: 00000000003706e0\n[ 449.977102] DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000\n[ 449.985065] DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400\n[ 449.993028] Call Trace:\n[ 449.995756] __iommu_dma_free+0x96/0x100\n[ 450.000139] bnx2fc_free_session_resc+0x67/0x240 [bnx2fc]\n[ 450.006171] bnx2fc_upload_session+0xce/0x100 [bnx2fc]\n[ 450.011910] bnx2fc_rport_event_handler+0x9f/0x240 [bnx2fc]\n[ 450.018136] fc_rport_work+0x103/0x5b0 [libfc]\n[ 450.023103] process_one_work+0x1e8/0x3c0\n[ 450.027581] worker_thread+0x50/0x3b0\n[ 450.031669] ? rescuer_thread+0x370/0x370\n[ 450.036143] kthread+0x149/0x170\n[ 450.039744] ? set_kthread_struct+0x40/0x40\n[ 450.044411] ret_from_fork+0x22/0x30\n[ 450.048404] Modules linked in: vfat msdos fat xfs nfs_layout_nfsv41_files rpcsec_gss_krb5 auth_rpcgss nfsv4 dns_resolver dm_service_time qedf qed crc8 bnx2fc libfcoe libfc scsi_transport_fc intel_rapl_msr intel_rapl_common x86_pkg_temp_thermal intel_powerclamp dcdbas rapl intel_cstate intel_uncore mei_me pcspkr mei ipmi_ssif lpc_ich ipmi_si fuse zram ext4 mbcache jbd2 loop nfsv3 nfs_acl nfs lockd grace fscache netfs irdma ice sd_mod t10_pi sg ib_uverbs ib_core 8021q garp mrp stp llc mgag200 i2c_algo_bit drm_kms_helper syscopyarea sysfillrect sysimgblt mxm_wmi fb_sys_fops cec crct10dif_pclmul ahci crc32_pclmul bnx2x drm ghash_clmulni_intel libahci rfkill i40e libata megaraid_sas mdio wmi sunrpc lrw dm_crypt dm_round_robin dm_multipath dm_snapshot dm_bufio dm_mirror dm_region_hash dm_log dm_zero dm_mod linear raid10 raid456 async_raid6_recov async_memcpy async_pq async_xor async_tx raid6_pq libcrc32c crc32c_intel raid1 raid0 iscsi_ibft squashfs be2iscsi bnx2i cnic uio cxgb4i cxgb4 tls\n[ 450.048497] libcxgbi libcxgb qla4xxx iscsi_boot_sysfs iscsi_tcp libiscsi_tcp libiscsi scsi_transport_iscsi edd ipmi_devintf ipmi_msghandler\n[ 450.159753] ---[ end trace 712de2c57c64abc8 ]---(CVE-2024-36919)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nbna: ensure the copied buf is NUL terminated\r\n\r\nCurrently, we allocate a nbytes-sized kernel buffer and copy nbytes from\nuserspace to that buffer. Later, we use sscanf on this buffer but we don\u0026apos;t\nensure that the string is terminated inside the buffer, this can lead to\nOOB read when using sscanf. Fix this issue by using memdup_user_nul\ninstead of memdup_user.(CVE-2024-36934)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nscsi: lpfc: Move NPIV\u0026apos;s transport unregistration to after resource clean up\r\n\r\nThere are cases after NPIV deletion where the fabric switch still believes\nthe NPIV is logged into the fabric. This occurs when a vport is\nunregistered before the Remove All DA_ID CT and LOGO ELS are sent to the\nfabric.\r\n\r\nCurrently fc_remove_host(), which calls dev_loss_tmo for all D_IDs including\nthe fabric D_ID, removes the last ndlp reference and frees the ndlp rport\nobject. This sometimes causes the race condition where the final DA_ID and\nLOGO are skipped from being sent to the fabric switch.\r\n\r\nFix by moving the fc_remove_host() and scsi_remove_host() calls after DA_ID\nand LOGO are sent.(CVE-2024-36952)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\ndrm/vmwgfx: Fix invalid reads in fence signaled events\r\n\r\nCorrectly set the length of the drm_event to the size of the structure\nthat\u0026apos;s actually used.\r\n\r\nThe length of the drm_event was set to the parent structure instead of\nto the drm_vmw_event_fence which is supposed to be read. drm_read\nuses the length parameter to copy the event to the user space thus\nresuling in oob reads.(CVE-2024-36960)",
"id": "OESA-2024-1736",
"modified": "2026-08-06T11:07:12Z",
"published": "2024-06-21T11:07:12Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://www.openeuler.org/en/security/safety-bulletin/detail.html?id=openEuler-SA-2024-1736"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2021-47229"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2021-47234"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2021-47249"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2021-47257"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2021-47267"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2021-47281"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2021-47301"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2021-47310"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2021-47321"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2021-47334"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2021-47344"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2021-47354"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2021-47372"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2021-47425"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2021-47440"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2021-47456"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2021-47468"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2021-47474"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2021-47482"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2021-47483"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2021-47485"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2021-47496"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2021-47509"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2021-47516"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2021-47571"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2022-48693"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2023-52708"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2023-52742"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2023-52747"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2023-52764"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2023-52810"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2023-52836"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2023-52843"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2023-52875"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2023-52880"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-27014"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-27019"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-27402"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-35819"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-35821"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-35828"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-35910"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-35935"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-35937"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-35947"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-35982"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-36016"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-36886"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-36901"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-36905"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-36919"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-36934"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-36952"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-36960"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.7.2",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
],
"summary": "kernel security update",
"upstream": [
"CVE-2021-47229",
"CVE-2021-47234",
"CVE-2021-47249",
"CVE-2021-47257",
"CVE-2021-47267",
"CVE-2021-47281",
"CVE-2021-47301",
"CVE-2021-47310",
"CVE-2021-47321",
"CVE-2021-47334",
"CVE-2021-47344",
"CVE-2021-47354",
"CVE-2021-47372",
"CVE-2021-47425",
"CVE-2021-47440",
"CVE-2021-47456",
"CVE-2021-47468",
"CVE-2021-47474",
"CVE-2021-47482",
"CVE-2021-47483",
"CVE-2021-47485",
"CVE-2021-47496",
"CVE-2021-47509",
"CVE-2021-47516",
"CVE-2021-47571",
"CVE-2022-48693",
"CVE-2023-52708",
"CVE-2023-52742",
"CVE-2023-52747",
"CVE-2023-52764",
"CVE-2023-52810",
"CVE-2023-52836",
"CVE-2023-52843",
"CVE-2023-52875",
"CVE-2023-52880",
"CVE-2024-27014",
"CVE-2024-27019",
"CVE-2024-27402",
"CVE-2024-35819",
"CVE-2024-35821",
"CVE-2024-35828",
"CVE-2024-35910",
"CVE-2024-35935",
"CVE-2024-35937",
"CVE-2024-35947",
"CVE-2024-35982",
"CVE-2024-36016",
"CVE-2024-36886",
"CVE-2024-36901",
"CVE-2024-36905",
"CVE-2024-36919",
"CVE-2024-36934",
"CVE-2024-36952",
"CVE-2024-36960"
]
}
OESA-2024-1942 (CVE-2021-47205)
Vulnerability from osv_openeuler – Published: 2024-08-02 11:07 – Updated: 2026-08-06 11:07 – Source websiteThe Linux Kernel, the operating system core itself.
Security Fix(es):
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
clk: sunxi-ng: Unregister clocks/resets when unbinding
Currently, unbinding a CCU driver unmaps the device's MMIO region, while leaving its clocks/resets and their providers registered. This can cause a page fault later when some clock operation tries to perform MMIO. Fix this by separating the CCU initialization from the memory allocation, and then using a devres callback to unregister the clocks and resets.
This also fixes a memory leak of the struct ccu_reset, and uses the
correct owner (the specific platform driver) for the clocks and resets.
Early OF clock providers are never unregistered, and limited error handling is possible, so they are mostly unchanged. The error reporting is made more consistent by moving the message inside of_sunxi_ccu_probe.(CVE-2021-47205)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
thermal/int340x_thermal: handle data_vault when the value is ZERO_SIZE_PTR
In some case, the GDDV returns a package with a buffer which has zero length. It causes that kmemdup() returns ZERO_SIZE_PTR (0x10).
Then the data_vault_read() got NULL point dereference problem when accessing the 0x10 value in data_vault.
[ 71.024560] BUG: kernel NULL pointer dereference, address: 0000000000000010
This patch uses ZERO_OR_NULL_PTR() for checking ZERO_SIZE_PTR or NULL value in data_vault.(CVE-2022-48703)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
net: marvell: prestera: Add missing of_node_put() in prestera_switch_set_base_mac_addr
This node pointer is returned by of_find_compatible_node() with refcount incremented. Calling of_node_put() to aovid the refcount leak.(CVE-2022-48859)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
of: Fix double free in of_parse_phandle_with_args_map
In of_parse_phandle_with_args_map() the inner loop that iterates through the map entries calls of_node_put(new) to free the reference acquired by the previous iteration of the inner loop. This assumes that the value of "new" is NULL on the first iteration of the inner loop.
Make sure that this is true in all iterations of the outer loop by setting "new" to NULL after its value is assigned to "cur".
Extend the unittest to detect the double free and add an additional test case that actually triggers this path.(CVE-2023-52679)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
media: gspca: cpia1: shift-out-of-bounds in set_flicker
Syzkaller reported the following issue: UBSAN: shift-out-of-bounds in drivers/media/usb/gspca/cpia1.c:1031:27 shift exponent 245 is too large for 32-bit type 'int'
When the value of the variable "sd->params.exposure.gain" exceeds the number of bits in an integer, a shift-out-of-bounds error is reported. It is triggered because the variable "currentexp" cannot be left-shifted by more than the number of bits in an integer. In order to avoid invalid range during left-shift, the conditional expression is added.(CVE-2023-52764)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
init/main.c: Fix potential static_command_line memory overflow
We allocate memory of size 'xlen + strlen(boot_command_line) + 1' for static_command_line, but the strings copied into static_command_line are extra_command_line and command_line, rather than extra_command_line and boot_command_line.
When strlen(command_line) > strlen(boot_command_line), static_command_line will overflow.
This patch just recovers strlen(command_line) which was miss-consolidated with strlen(boot_command_line) in the commit f5c7310ac73e ("init/main: add checks for the return value of memblock_alloc*()")(CVE-2024-26988)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
netfilter: nf_tables: restore set elements when delete set fails
From abort path, nft_mapelem_activate() needs to restore refcounters to the original state. Currently, it uses the set->ops->walk() to iterate over these set elements. The existing set iterator skips inactive elements in the next generation, this does not work from the abort path to restore the original state since it has to skip active elements instead (not inactive ones).
This patch moves the check for inactive elements to the set iterator callback, then it reverses the logic for the .activate case which needs to skip active elements.
Toggle next generation bit for elements when delete set command is invoked and call nft_clear() from .activate (abort) path to restore the next generation bit.
The splat below shows an object in mappings memleak:
[43929.457523] ------------[ cut here ]------------ [43929.457532] WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 1139 at include/net/netfilter/nf_tables.h:1237 nft_setelem_data_deactivate+0xe4/0xf0 [nf_tables] [...] [43929.458014] RIP: 0010:nft_setelem_data_deactivate+0xe4/0xf0 [nf_tables] [43929.458076] Code: 83 f8 01 77 ab 49 8d 7c 24 08 e8 37 5e d0 de 49 8b 6c 24 08 48 8d 7d 50 e8 e9 5c d0 de 8b 45 50 8d 50 ff 89 55 50 85 c0 75 86 <0f> 0b eb 82 0f 0b eb b3 0f 1f 40 00 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 [43929.458081] RSP: 0018:ffff888140f9f4b0 EFLAGS: 00010246 [43929.458086] RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: ffff8881434f5288 RCX: dffffc0000000000 [43929.458090] RDX: 00000000ffffffff RSI: ffffffffa26d28a7 RDI: ffff88810ecc9550 [43929.458093] RBP: ffff88810ecc9500 R08: 0000000000000001 R09: ffffed10281f3e8f [43929.458096] R10: 0000000000000003 R11: ffff0000ffff0000 R12: ffff8881434f52a0 [43929.458100] R13: ffff888140f9f5f4 R14: ffff888151c7a800 R15: 0000000000000002 [43929.458103] FS: 00007f0c687c4740(0000) GS:ffff888390800000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 [43929.458107] CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 [43929.458111] CR2: 00007f58dbe5b008 CR3: 0000000123602005 CR4: 00000000001706f0 [43929.458114] Call Trace: [43929.458118] <TASK> [43929.458121] ? __warn+0x9f/0x1a0 [43929.458127] ? nft_setelem_data_deactivate+0xe4/0xf0 [nf_tables] [43929.458188] ? report_bug+0x1b1/0x1e0 [43929.458196] ? handle_bug+0x3c/0x70 [43929.458200] ? exc_invalid_op+0x17/0x40 [43929.458211] ? nft_setelem_data_deactivate+0xd7/0xf0 [nf_tables] [43929.458271] ? nft_setelem_data_deactivate+0xe4/0xf0 [nf_tables] [43929.458332] nft_mapelem_deactivate+0x24/0x30 [nf_tables] [43929.458392] nft_rhash_walk+0xdd/0x180 [nf_tables] [43929.458453] ? __pfx_nft_rhash_walk+0x10/0x10 [nf_tables] [43929.458512] ? rb_insert_color+0x2e/0x280 [43929.458520] nft_map_deactivate+0xdc/0x1e0 [nf_tables] [43929.458582] ? __pfx_nft_map_deactivate+0x10/0x10 [nf_tables] [43929.458642] ? __pfx_nft_mapelem_deactivate+0x10/0x10 [nf_tables] [43929.458701] ? __rcu_read_unlock+0x46/0x70 [43929.458709] nft_delset+0xff/0x110 [nf_tables] [43929.458769] nft_flush_table+0x16f/0x460 [nf_tables] [43929.458830] nf_tables_deltable+0x501/0x580 nf_tables
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
f2fs: fix to avoid potential panic during recovery
During recovery, if FAULT_BLOCK is on, it is possible that f2fs_reserve_new_block() will return -ENOSPC during recovery, then it may trigger panic.
Also, if fault injection rate is 1 and only FAULT_BLOCK fault type is on, it may encounter deadloop in loop of block reservation.
Let's change as below to fix these issues: - remove bug_on() to avoid panic. - limit the loop count of block reservation to avoid potential deadloop.(CVE-2024-27032)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
clk: Fix clk_core_get NULL dereference
It is possible for clk_core_get to dereference a NULL in the following sequence:
clk_core_get() of_clk_get_hw_from_clkspec() __of_clk_get_hw_from_provider() __clk_get_hw()
__clk_get_hw() can return NULL which is dereferenced by clk_core_get() at hw->core.
Prior to commit dde4eff47c82 ("clk: Look for parents with clkdev based clk_lookups") the check IS_ERR_OR_NULL() was performed which would have caught the NULL.
Reading the description of this function it talks about returning NULL but that cannot be so at the moment.
Update the function to check for hw before dereferencing it and return NULL if hw is NULL.(CVE-2024-27038)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
net: phy: fix phy_get_internal_delay accessing an empty array
The phy_get_internal_delay function could try to access to an empty array in the case that the driver is calling phy_get_internal_delay without defining delay_values and rx-internal-delay-ps or tx-internal-delay-ps is defined to 0 in the device-tree. This will lead to "unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at virtual address 0". To avoid this kernel oops, the test should be delay >= 0. As there is already delay < 0 test just before, the test could only be size == 0.(CVE-2024-27047)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
wifi: rtl8xxxu: add cancel_work_sync() for c2hcmd_work
The workqueue might still be running, when the driver is stopped. To avoid a use-after-free, call cancel_work_sync() in rtl8xxxu_stop().(CVE-2024-27052)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
netfilter: nf_tables: do not compare internal table flags on updates
Restore skipping transaction if table update does not modify flags.(CVE-2024-27065)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
power: supply: bq27xxx-i2c: Do not free non existing IRQ
The bq27xxx i2c-client may not have an IRQ, in which case client->irq will be 0. bq27xxx_battery_i2c_probe() already has an if (client->irq) check wrapping the request_threaded_irq().
But bq27xxx_battery_i2c_remove() unconditionally calls free_irq(client->irq) leading to:
[ 190.310742] ------------[ cut here ]------------ [ 190.310843] Trying to free already-free IRQ 0 [ 190.310861] WARNING: CPU: 2 PID: 1304 at kernel/irq/manage.c:1893 free_irq+0x1b8/0x310
Followed by a backtrace when unbinding the driver. Add an if (client->irq) to bq27xxx_battery_i2c_remove() mirroring probe() to fix this.(CVE-2024-27412)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
Bluetooth: hci_event: Fix handling of HCI_EV_IO_CAPA_REQUEST
If we received HCI_EV_IO_CAPA_REQUEST while HCI_OP_READ_REMOTE_EXT_FEATURES is yet to be responded assume the remote does support SSP since otherwise this event shouldn't be generated.(CVE-2024-27416)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
dma-mapping: benchmark: fix node id validation
While validating node ids in map_benchmark_ioctl(), node_possible() may be provided with invalid argument outside of [0,MAX_NUMNODES-1] range leading to:
BUG: KASAN: wild-memory-access in map_benchmark_ioctl (kernel/dma/map_benchmark.c:214) Read of size 8 at addr 1fffffff8ccb6398 by task dma_map_benchma/971 CPU: 7 PID: 971 Comm: dma_map_benchma Not tainted 6.9.0-rc6 #37 Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996) Call Trace: <TASK> dump_stack_lvl (lib/dump_stack.c:117) kasan_report (mm/kasan/report.c:603) kasan_check_range (mm/kasan/generic.c:189) variable_test_bit (arch/x86/include/asm/bitops.h:227) [inline] arch_test_bit (arch/x86/include/asm/bitops.h:239) [inline] _test_bit at (include/asm-generic/bitops/instrumented-non-atomic.h:142) [inline] node_state (include/linux/nodemask.h:423) [inline] map_benchmark_ioctl (kernel/dma/map_benchmark.c:214) full_proxy_unlocked_ioctl (fs/debugfs/file.c:333) __x64_sys_ioctl (fs/ioctl.c:890) do_syscall_64 (arch/x86/entry/common.c:83) entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe (arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:130)
Compare node ids with sane bounds first. NUMA_NO_NODE is considered a special valid case meaning that benchmarking kthreads won't be bound to a cpuset of a given node.
Found by Linux Verification Center (linuxtesting.org).(CVE-2024-34777)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
net: mvpp2: clear BM pool before initialization
Register value persist after booting the kernel using kexec which results in kernel panic. Thus clear the BM pool registers before initialisation to fix the issue.(CVE-2024-35837)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
drm/amdgpu: Skip do PCI error slot reset during RAS recovery
Why: The PCI error slot reset maybe triggered after inject ue to UMC multi times, this caused system hang. [ 557.371857] amdgpu 0000:af:00.0: amdgpu: GPU reset succeeded, trying to resume [ 557.373718] [drm] PCIE GART of 512M enabled. [ 557.373722] [drm] PTB located at 0x0000031FED700000 [ 557.373788] [drm] VRAM is lost due to GPU reset! [ 557.373789] [drm] PSP is resuming... [ 557.547012] mlx5_core 0000:55:00.0: mlx5_pci_err_detected Device state = 1 pci_status: 0. Exit, result = 3, need reset [ 557.547067] [drm] PCI error: detected callback, state(1)!! [ 557.547069] [drm] No support for XGMI hive yet... [ 557.548125] mlx5_core 0000:55:00.0: mlx5_pci_slot_reset Device state = 1 pci_status: 0. Enter [ 557.607763] mlx5_core 0000:55:00.0: wait vital counter value 0x16b5b after 1 iterations [ 557.607777] mlx5_core 0000:55:00.0: mlx5_pci_slot_reset Device state = 1 pci_status: 1. Exit, err = 0, result = 5, recovered [ 557.610492] [drm] PCI error: slot reset callback!! ... [ 560.689382] amdgpu 0000:3f:00.0: amdgpu: GPU reset(2) succeeded! [ 560.689546] amdgpu 0000:5a:00.0: amdgpu: GPU reset(2) succeeded! [ 560.689562] general protection fault, probably for non-canonical address 0x5f080b54534f611f: 0000 [#1] SMP NOPTI [ 560.701008] CPU: 16 PID: 2361 Comm: kworker/u448:9 Tainted: G OE 5.15.0-91-generic #101-Ubuntu [ 560.712057] Hardware name: Microsoft C278A/C278A, BIOS C2789.5.BS.1C11.AG.1 11/08/2023 [ 560.720959] Workqueue: amdgpu-reset-hive amdgpu_ras_do_recovery [amdgpu] [ 560.728887] RIP: 0010:amdgpu_device_gpu_recover.cold+0xbf1/0xcf5 [amdgpu] [ 560.736891] Code: ff 41 89 c6 e9 1b ff ff ff 44 0f b6 45 b0 e9 4f ff ff ff be 01 00 00 00 4c 89 e7 e8 76 c9 8b ff 44 0f b6 45 b0 e9 3c fd ff ff <48> 83 ba 18 02 00 00 00 0f 84 6a f8 ff ff 48 8d 7a 78 be 01 00 00 [ 560.757967] RSP: 0018:ffa0000032e53d80 EFLAGS: 00010202 [ 560.763848] RAX: ffa00000001dfd10 RBX: ffa0000000197090 RCX: ffa0000032e53db0 [ 560.771856] RDX: 5f080b54534f5f07 RSI: 0000000000000000 RDI: ff11000128100010 [ 560.779867] RBP: ffa0000032e53df0 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: ffffffffffe77f08 [ 560.787879] R10: 0000000000ffff0a R11: 0000000000000001 R12: 0000000000000000 [ 560.795889] R13: ffa0000032e53e00 R14: 0000000000000000 R15: 0000000000000000 [ 560.803889] FS: 0000000000000000(0000) GS:ff11007e7e800000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 [ 560.812973] CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 [ 560.819422] CR2: 000055a04c118e68 CR3: 0000000007410005 CR4: 0000000000771ee0 [ 560.827433] DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000 [ 560.835433] DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe07f0 DR7: 0000000000000400 [ 560.843444] PKRU: 55555554 [ 560.846480] Call Trace: [ 560.849225] <TASK> [ 560.851580] ? show_trace_log_lvl+0x1d6/0x2ea [ 560.856488] ? show_trace_log_lvl+0x1d6/0x2ea [ 560.861379] ? amdgpu_ras_do_recovery+0x1b2/0x210 [amdgpu] [ 560.867778] ? show_regs.part.0+0x23/0x29 [ 560.872293] ? __die_body.cold+0x8/0xd [ 560.876502] ? die_addr+0x3e/0x60 [ 560.880238] ? exc_general_protection+0x1c5/0x410 [ 560.885532] ? asm_exc_general_protection+0x27/0x30 [ 560.891025] ? amdgpu_device_gpu_recover.cold+0xbf1/0xcf5 [amdgpu] [ 560.898323] amdgpu_ras_do_recovery+0x1b2/0x210 [amdgpu] [ 560.904520] process_one_work+0x228/0x3d0 How: In RAS recovery, mode-1 reset is issued from RAS fatal error handling and expected all the nodes in a hive to be reset. no need to issue another mode-1 during this procedure.(CVE-2024-35931)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
fs/9p: fix uninitialized values during inode evict
If an iget fails due to not being able to retrieve information from the server then the inode structure is only partially initialized. When the inode gets evicted, references to uninitialized structures (like fscache cookies) were being made.
This patch checks for a bad_inode before doing anything other than clearing the inode from the cache. Since the inode is bad, it shouldn't have any state associated with it that needs to be written back (and there really isn't a way to complete those anyways).(CVE-2024-36923)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
nilfs2: fix potential kernel bug due to lack of writeback flag waiting
Destructive writes to a block device on which nilfs2 is mounted can cause a kernel bug in the folio/page writeback start routine or writeback end routine (__folio_start_writeback in the log below):
kernel BUG at mm/page-writeback.c:3070! Oops: invalid opcode: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP KASAN PTI ... RIP: 0010:__folio_start_writeback+0xbaa/0x10e0 Code: 25 ff 0f 00 00 0f 84 18 01 00 00 e8 40 ca c6 ff e9 17 f6 ff ff e8 36 ca c6 ff 4c 89 f7 48 c7 c6 80 c0 12 84 e8 e7 b3 0f 00 90 <0f> 0b e8 1f ca c6 ff 4c 89 f7 48 c7 c6 a0 c6 12 84 e8 d0 b3 0f 00 ... Call Trace: <TASK> nilfs_segctor_do_construct+0x4654/0x69d0 [nilfs2] nilfs_segctor_construct+0x181/0x6b0 [nilfs2] nilfs_segctor_thread+0x548/0x11c0 [nilfs2] kthread+0x2f0/0x390 ret_from_fork+0x4b/0x80 ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30 </TASK>
This is because when the log writer starts a writeback for segment summary blocks or a super root block that use the backing device's page cache, it does not wait for the ongoing folio/page writeback, resulting in an inconsistent writeback state.
Fix this issue by waiting for ongoing writebacks when putting folios/pages on the backing device into writeback state.(CVE-2024-37078)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
drm: bridge: cdns-mhdp8546: Fix possible null pointer dereference
In cdns_mhdp_atomic_enable(), the return value of drm_mode_duplicate() is assigned to mhdp_state->current_mode, and there is a dereference of it in drm_mode_set_name(), which will lead to a NULL pointer dereference on failure of drm_mode_duplicate().
Fix this bug add a check of mhdp_state->current_mode.(CVE-2024-38548)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
wifi: carl9170: add a proper sanity check for endpoints
Syzkaller reports [1] hitting a warning which is caused by presence of a wrong endpoint type at the URB sumbitting stage. While there was a check for a specific 4th endpoint, since it can switch types between bulk and interrupt, other endpoints are trusted implicitly. Similar warning is triggered in a couple of other syzbot issues [2].
Fix the issue by doing a comprehensive check of all endpoints taking into account difference between high- and full-speed configuration.
[1] Syzkaller report: ... WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 4721 at drivers/usb/core/urb.c:504 usb_submit_urb+0xed6/0x1880 drivers/usb/core/urb.c:504 ... Call Trace: <TASK> carl9170_usb_send_rx_irq_urb+0x273/0x340 drivers/net/wireless/ath/carl9170/usb.c:504 carl9170_usb_init_device drivers/net/wireless/ath/carl9170/usb.c:939 [inline] carl9170_usb_firmware_finish drivers/net/wireless/ath/carl9170/usb.c:999 [inline] carl9170_usb_firmware_step2+0x175/0x240 drivers/net/wireless/ath/carl9170/usb.c:1028 request_firmware_work_func+0x130/0x240 drivers/base/firmware_loader/main.c:1107 process_one_work+0x9bf/0x1710 kernel/workqueue.c:2289 worker_thread+0x669/0x1090 kernel/workqueue.c:2436 kthread+0x2e8/0x3a0 kernel/kthread.c:376 ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x30 arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:308 </TASK>
[2] Related syzkaller crashes:(CVE-2024-38567)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
macintosh/via-macii: Fix "BUG: sleeping function called from invalid context"
The via-macii ADB driver calls request_irq() after disabling hard interrupts. But disabling interrupts isn't necessary here because the VIA shift register interrupt was masked during VIA1 initialization.(CVE-2024-38607)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
media: i2c: et8ek8: Don't strip remove function when driver is builtin
Using __exit for the remove function results in the remove callback being discarded with CONFIG_VIDEO_ET8EK8=y. When such a device gets unbound (e.g. using sysfs or hotplug), the driver is just removed without the cleanup being performed. This results in resource leaks. Fix it by compiling in the remove callback unconditionally.
This also fixes a W=1 modpost warning:
WARNING: modpost: drivers/media/i2c/et8ek8/et8ek8: section mismatch in reference: et8ek8_i2c_driver+0x10 (section: .data) -> et8ek8_remove (section: .exit.text)(CVE-2024-38611)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
drm/amdgpu: add error handle to avoid out-of-bounds
if the sdma_v4_0_irq_id_to_seq return -EINVAL, the process should be stop to avoid out-of-bounds read, so directly return -EINVAL.(CVE-2024-39471)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
fbdev: savage: Handle err return when savagefb_check_var failed
The commit 04e5eac8f3ab("fbdev: savage: Error out if pixclock equals zero") checks the value of pixclock to avoid divide-by-zero error. However the function savagefb_probe doesn't handle the error return of savagefb_check_var. When pixclock is 0, it will cause divide-by-zero error.(CVE-2024-39475)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
md/raid5: fix deadlock that raid5d() wait for itself to clear MD_SB_CHANGE_PENDING
Xiao reported that lvm2 test lvconvert-raid-takeover.sh can hang with small possibility, the root cause is exactly the same as commit bed9e27baf52 ("Revert "md/raid5: Wait for MD_SB_CHANGE_PENDING in raid5d"")
However, Dan reported another hang after that, and junxiao investigated the problem and found out that this is caused by plugged bio can't issue from raid5d().
Current implementation in raid5d() has a weird dependence:
1) md_check_recovery() from raid5d() must hold 'reconfig_mutex' to clear MD_SB_CHANGE_PENDING; 2) raid5d() handles IO in a deadloop, until all IO are issued; 3) IO from raid5d() must wait for MD_SB_CHANGE_PENDING to be cleared;
This behaviour is introduce before v2.6, and for consequence, if other context hold 'reconfig_mutex', and md_check_recovery() can't update super_block, then raid5d() will waste one cpu 100% by the deadloop, until 'reconfig_mutex' is released.
Refer to the implementation from raid1 and raid10, fix this problem by skipping issue IO if MD_SB_CHANGE_PENDING is still set after md_check_recovery(), daemon thread will be woken up when 'reconfig_mutex' is released. Meanwhile, the hang problem will be fixed as well.(CVE-2024-39476)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
mmc: davinci: Don't strip remove function when driver is builtin
Using __exit for the remove function results in the remove callback being discarded with CONFIG_MMC_DAVINCI=y. When such a device gets unbound (e.g. using sysfs or hotplug), the driver is just removed without the cleanup being performed. This results in resource leaks. Fix it by compiling in the remove callback unconditionally.
This also fixes a W=1 modpost warning:
WARNING: modpost: drivers/mmc/host/davinci_mmc: section mismatch in reference: davinci_mmcsd_driver+0x10 (section: .data) -> davinci_mmcsd_remove (section: .exit.text)(CVE-2024-39484)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
liquidio: Adjust a NULL pointer handling path in lio_vf_rep_copy_packet
In lio_vf_rep_copy_packet() pg_info->page is compared to a NULL value, but then it is unconditionally passed to skb_add_rx_frag() which looks strange and could lead to null pointer dereference.
lio_vf_rep_copy_packet() call trace looks like: octeon_droq_process_packets octeon_droq_fast_process_packets octeon_droq_dispatch_pkt octeon_create_recv_info ...search in the dispatch_list... ->disp_fn(rdisp->rinfo, ...) lio_vf_rep_pkt_recv(struct octeon_recv_info *recv_info, ...) In this path there is no code which sets pg_info->page to NULL. So this check looks unneeded and doesn't solve potential problem. But I guess the author had reason to add a check and I have no such card and can't do real test. In addition, the code in the function liquidio_push_packet() in liquidio/lio_core.c does exactly the same.
Based on this, I consider the most acceptable compromise solution to adjust this issue by moving skb_add_rx_frag() into conditional scope.
Found by Linux Verification Center (linuxtesting.org) with SVACE.(CVE-2024-39506)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
io_uring/io-wq: Use set_bit() and test_bit() at worker->flags
Utilize set_bit() and test_bit() on worker->flags within io_uring/io-wq to address potential data races.
The structure io_worker->flags may be accessed through various data paths, leading to concurrency issues. When KCSAN is enabled, it reveals data races occurring in io_worker_handle_work and io_wq_activate_free_worker functions.
BUG: KCSAN: data-race in io_worker_handle_work / io_wq_activate_free_worker
write to 0xffff8885c4246404 of 4 bytes by task 49071 on cpu 28:
io_worker_handle_work (io_uring/io-wq.c:434 io_uring/io-wq.c:569)
io_wq_worker (io_uring/io-wq.c:?)
<snip>
read to 0xffff8885c4246404 of 4 bytes by task 49024 on cpu 5:
io_wq_activate_free_worker (io_uring/io-wq.c:? io_uring/io-wq.c:285)
io_wq_enqueue (io_uring/io-wq.c:947)
io_queue_iowq (io_uring/io_uring.c:524)
io_req_task_submit (io_uring/io_uring.c:1511)
io_handle_tw_list (io_uring/io_uring.c:1198)
<snip>
Line numbers against commit 18daea77cca6 ("Merge tag 'for-linus' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/virt/kvm/kvm").
These races involve writes and reads to the same memory location by different tasks running on different CPUs. To mitigate this, refactor the code to use atomic operations such as set_bit(), test_bit(), and clear_bit() instead of basic "and" and "or" operations. This ensures thread-safe manipulation of worker flags.
Also, move create_index to avoid holes in the structure.(CVE-2024-39508)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
riscv: rewrite __kernel_map_pages() to fix sleeping in invalid context
__kernel_map_pages() is a debug function which clears the valid bit in page table entry for deallocated pages to detect illegal memory accesses to freed pages.
This function set/clear the valid bit using __set_memory(). __set_memory() acquires init_mm's semaphore, and this operation may sleep. This is problematic, because __kernel_map_pages() can be called in atomic context, and thus is illegal to sleep. An example warning that this causes:
BUG: sleeping function called from invalid context at kernel/locking/rwsem.c:1578 in_atomic(): 1, irqs_disabled(): 0, non_block: 0, pid: 2, name: kthreadd preempt_count: 2, expected: 0 CPU: 0 PID: 2 Comm: kthreadd Not tainted 6.9.0-g1d4c6d784ef6 #37 Hardware name: riscv-virtio,qemu (DT) Call Trace: [<ffffffff800060dc>] dump_backtrace+0x1c/0x24 [<ffffffff8091ef6e>] show_stack+0x2c/0x38 [<ffffffff8092baf8>] dump_stack_lvl+0x5a/0x72 [<ffffffff8092bb24>] dump_stack+0x14/0x1c [<ffffffff8003b7ac>] __might_resched+0x104/0x10e [<ffffffff8003b7f4>] __might_sleep+0x3e/0x62 [<ffffffff8093276a>] down_write+0x20/0x72 [<ffffffff8000cf00>] __set_memory+0x82/0x2fa [<ffffffff8000d324>] __kernel_map_pages+0x5a/0xd4 [<ffffffff80196cca>] __alloc_pages_bulk+0x3b2/0x43a [<ffffffff8018ee82>] __vmalloc_node_range+0x196/0x6ba [<ffffffff80011904>] copy_process+0x72c/0x17ec [<ffffffff80012ab4>] kernel_clone+0x60/0x2fe [<ffffffff80012f62>] kernel_thread+0x82/0xa0 [<ffffffff8003552c>] kthreadd+0x14a/0x1be [<ffffffff809357de>] ret_from_fork+0xe/0x1c
Rewrite this function with apply_to_existing_page_range(). It is fine to not have any locking, because __kernel_map_pages() works with pages being allocated/deallocated and those pages are not changed by anyone else in the meantime.(CVE-2024-40915)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
iommu: Return right value in iommu_sva_bind_device()
iommu_sva_bind_device() should return either a sva bond handle or an ERR_PTR value in error cases. Existing drivers (idxd and uacce) only check the return value with IS_ERR(). This could potentially lead to a kernel NULL pointer dereference issue if the function returns NULL instead of an error pointer.
In reality, this doesn't cause any problems because iommu_sva_bind_device() only returns NULL when the kernel is not configured with CONFIG_IOMMU_SVA. In this case, iommu_dev_enable_feature(dev, IOMMU_DEV_FEAT_SVA) will return an error, and the device drivers won't call iommu_sva_bind_device() at all.(CVE-2024-40945)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
ima: Avoid blocking in RCU read-side critical section
A panic happens in ima_match_policy:
BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at 0000000000000010 PGD 42f873067 P4D 0 Oops: 0000 [#1] SMP NOPTI CPU: 5 PID: 1286325 Comm: kubeletmonit.sh Kdump: loaded Tainted: P Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 0.0.0 02/06/2015 RIP: 0010:ima_match_policy+0x84/0x450 Code: 49 89 fc 41 89 cf 31 ed 89 44 24 14 eb 1c 44 39 7b 18 74 26 41 83 ff 05 74 20 48 8b 1b 48 3b 1d f2 b9 f4 00 0f 84 9c 01 00 00 <44> 85 73 10 74 ea 44 8b 6b 14 41 f6 c5 01 75 d4 41 f6 c5 02 74 0f RSP: 0018:ff71570009e07a80 EFLAGS: 00010207 RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: 0000000000000000 RCX: 0000000000000200 RDX: ffffffffad8dc7c0 RSI: 0000000024924925 RDI: ff3e27850dea2000 RBP: 0000000000000000 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: ffffffffabfce739 R10: ff3e27810cc42400 R11: 0000000000000000 R12: ff3e2781825ef970 R13: 00000000ff3e2785 R14: 000000000000000c R15: 0000000000000001 FS: 00007f5195b51740(0000) GS:ff3e278b12d40000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 CR2: 0000000000000010 CR3: 0000000626d24002 CR4: 0000000000361ee0 DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000 DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400 Call Trace: ima_get_action+0x22/0x30 process_measurement+0xb0/0x830 ? page_add_file_rmap+0x15/0x170 ? alloc_set_pte+0x269/0x4c0 ? prep_new_page+0x81/0x140 ? simple_xattr_get+0x75/0xa0 ? selinux_file_open+0x9d/0xf0 ima_file_check+0x64/0x90 path_openat+0x571/0x1720 do_filp_open+0x9b/0x110 ? page_counter_try_charge+0x57/0xc0 ? files_cgroup_alloc_fd+0x38/0x60 ? __alloc_fd+0xd4/0x250 ? do_sys_open+0x1bd/0x250 do_sys_open+0x1bd/0x250 do_syscall_64+0x5d/0x1d0 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x65/0xca
Commit c7423dbdbc9e ("ima: Handle -ESTALE returned by ima_filter_rule_match()") introduced call to ima_lsm_copy_rule within a RCU read-side critical section which contains kmalloc with GFP_KERNEL. This implies a possible sleep and violates limitations of RCU read-side critical sections on non-PREEMPT systems.
Sleeping within RCU read-side critical section might cause synchronize_rcu() returning early and break RCU protection, allowing a UAF to happen.
The root cause of this issue could be described as follows: | Thread A | Thread B | | |ima_match_policy | | | rcu_read_lock | |ima_lsm_update_rule | | | synchronize_rcu | | | | kmalloc(GFP_KERNEL)| | | sleep | ==> synchronize_rcu returns early | kfree(entry) | | | | entry = entry->next| ==> UAF happens and entry now becomes NULL (or could be anything). | | entry->action | ==> Accessing entry might cause panic.
To fix this issue, we are converting all kmalloc that is called within RCU read-side critical section to use GFP_ATOMIC.
PM: fixed missing comment, long lines, !CONFIG_IMA_LSM_RULES case
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
dmaengine: idxd: Fix possible Use-After-Free in irq_process_work_list
Use list_for_each_entry_safe() to allow iterating through the list and deleting the entry in the iteration process. The descriptor is freed via idxd_desc_complete() and there's a slight chance may cause issue for the list iterator when the descriptor is reused by another thread without it being deleted from the list.(CVE-2024-40956)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
ipv6: prevent possible NULL dereference in rt6_probe()
syzbot caught a NULL dereference in rt6_probe() [1]
Bail out if __in6_dev_get() returns NULL.
[1] Oops: general protection fault, probably for non-canonical address 0xdffffc00000000cb: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP KASAN PTI KASAN: null-ptr-deref in range [0x0000000000000658-0x000000000000065f] CPU: 1 PID: 22444 Comm: syz-executor.0 Not tainted 6.10.0-rc2-syzkaller-00383-gb8481381d4e2 #0 Hardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 04/02/2024 RIP: 0010:rt6_probe net/ipv6/route.c:656 [inline] RIP: 0010:find_match+0x8c4/0xf50 net/ipv6/route.c:758 Code: 14 fd f7 48 8b 85 38 ff ff ff 48 c7 45 b0 00 00 00 00 48 8d b8 5c 06 00 00 48 b8 00 00 00 00 00 fc ff df 48 89 fa 48 c1 ea 03 <0f> b6 14 02 48 89 f8 83 e0 07 83 c0 03 38 d0 7c 08 84 d2 0f 85 19 RSP: 0018:ffffc900034af070 EFLAGS: 00010203 RAX: dffffc0000000000 RBX: 0000000000000000 RCX: ffffc90004521000 RDX: 00000000000000cb RSI: ffffffff8990d0cd RDI: 000000000000065c RBP: ffffc900034af150 R08: 0000000000000005 R09: 0000000000000000 R10: 0000000000000001 R11: 0000000000000002 R12: 000000000000000a R13: 1ffff92000695e18 R14: ffff8880244a1d20 R15: 0000000000000000 FS: 00007f4844a5a6c0(0000) GS:ffff8880b9300000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 CR2: 0000001b31b27000 CR3: 000000002d42c000 CR4: 00000000003506f0 DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000 DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400 Call Trace: <TASK> rt6_nh_find_match+0xfa/0x1a0 net/ipv6/route.c:784 nexthop_for_each_fib6_nh+0x26d/0x4a0 net/ipv4/nexthop.c:1496 __find_rr_leaf+0x6e7/0xe00 net/ipv6/route.c:825 find_rr_leaf net/ipv6/route.c:853 [inline] rt6_select net/ipv6/route.c:897 [inline] fib6_table_lookup+0x57e/0xa30 net/ipv6/route.c:2195 ip6_pol_route+0x1cd/0x1150 net/ipv6/route.c:2231 pol_lookup_func include/net/ip6_fib.h:616 [inline] fib6_rule_lookup+0x386/0x720 net/ipv6/fib6_rules.c:121 ip6_route_output_flags_noref net/ipv6/route.c:2639 [inline] ip6_route_output_flags+0x1d0/0x640 net/ipv6/route.c:2651 ip6_dst_lookup_tail.constprop.0+0x961/0x1760 net/ipv6/ip6_output.c:1147 ip6_dst_lookup_flow+0x99/0x1d0 net/ipv6/ip6_output.c:1250 rawv6_sendmsg+0xdab/0x4340 net/ipv6/raw.c:898 inet_sendmsg+0x119/0x140 net/ipv4/af_inet.c:853 sock_sendmsg_nosec net/socket.c:730 [inline] __sock_sendmsg net/socket.c:745 [inline] sock_write_iter+0x4b8/0x5c0 net/socket.c:1160 new_sync_write fs/read_write.c:497 [inline] vfs_write+0x6b6/0x1140 fs/read_write.c:590 ksys_write+0x1f8/0x260 fs/read_write.c:643 do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:52 [inline] do_syscall_64+0xcd/0x250 arch/x86/entry/common.c:83 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f(CVE-2024-40960)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
mips: bmips: BCM6358: make sure CBR is correctly set
It was discovered that some device have CBR address set to 0 causing kernel panic when arch_sync_dma_for_cpu_all is called.
This was notice in situation where the system is booted from TP1 and BMIPS_GET_CBR() returns 0 instead of a valid address and !!(read_c0_brcm_cmt_local() & (1 << 31)); not failing.
The current check whether RAC flush should be disabled or not are not enough hence lets check if CBR is a valid address or not.(CVE-2024-40963)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
serial: imx: Introduce timeout when waiting on transmitter empty
By waiting at most 1 second for USR2_TXDC to be set, we avoid a potential deadlock.
In case of the timeout, there is not much we can do, so we simply ignore the transmitter state and optimistically try to continue.(CVE-2024-40967)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
ext4: do not create EA inode under buffer lock
ext4_xattr_set_entry() creates new EA inodes while holding buffer lock on the external xattr block. This is problematic as it nests all the allocation locking (which acquires locks on other buffers) under the buffer lock. This can even deadlock when the filesystem is corrupted and e.g. quota file is setup to contain xattr block as data block. Move the allocation of EA inode out of ext4_xattr_set_entry() into the callers.(CVE-2024-40972)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
drop_monitor: replace spin_lock by raw_spin_lock
trace_drop_common() is called with preemption disabled, and it acquires a spin_lock. This is problematic for RT kernels because spin_locks are sleeping locks in this configuration, which causes the following splat:
BUG: sleeping function called from invalid context at kernel/locking/spinlock_rt.c:48 in_atomic(): 1, irqs_disabled(): 1, non_block: 0, pid: 449, name: rcuc/47 preempt_count: 1, expected: 0 RCU nest depth: 2, expected: 2 5 locks held by rcuc/47/449: #0: ff1100086ec30a60 ((softirq_ctrl.lock)){+.+.}-{2:2}, at: __local_bh_disable_ip+0x105/0x210 #1: ffffffffb394a280 (rcu_read_lock){....}-{1:2}, at: rt_spin_lock+0xbf/0x130 #2: ffffffffb394a280 (rcu_read_lock){....}-{1:2}, at: __local_bh_disable_ip+0x11c/0x210 #3: ffffffffb394a160 (rcu_callback){....}-{0:0}, at: rcu_do_batch+0x360/0xc70 #4: ff1100086ee07520 (&data->lock){+.+.}-{2:2}, at: trace_drop_common.constprop.0+0xb5/0x290 irq event stamp: 139909 hardirqs last enabled at (139908): [<ffffffffb1df2b33>] _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x63/0x80 hardirqs last disabled at (139909): [<ffffffffb19bd03d>] trace_drop_common.constprop.0+0x26d/0x290 softirqs last enabled at (139892): [<ffffffffb07a1083>] __local_bh_enable_ip+0x103/0x170 softirqs last disabled at (139898): [<ffffffffb0909b33>] rcu_cpu_kthread+0x93/0x1f0 Preemption disabled at: [<ffffffffb1de786b>] rt_mutex_slowunlock+0xab/0x2e0 CPU: 47 PID: 449 Comm: rcuc/47 Not tainted 6.9.0-rc2-rt1+ #7 Hardware name: Dell Inc. PowerEdge R650/0Y2G81, BIOS 1.6.5 04/15/2022 Call Trace: <TASK> dump_stack_lvl+0x8c/0xd0 dump_stack+0x14/0x20 __might_resched+0x21e/0x2f0 rt_spin_lock+0x5e/0x130 ? trace_drop_common.constprop.0+0xb5/0x290 ? skb_queue_purge_reason.part.0+0x1bf/0x230 trace_drop_common.constprop.0+0xb5/0x290 ? preempt_count_sub+0x1c/0xd0 ? _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x4a/0x80 ? __pfx_trace_drop_common.constprop.0+0x10/0x10 ? rt_mutex_slowunlock+0x26a/0x2e0 ? skb_queue_purge_reason.part.0+0x1bf/0x230 ? __pfx_rt_mutex_slowunlock+0x10/0x10 ? skb_queue_purge_reason.part.0+0x1bf/0x230 trace_kfree_skb_hit+0x15/0x20 trace_kfree_skb+0xe9/0x150 kfree_skb_reason+0x7b/0x110 skb_queue_purge_reason.part.0+0x1bf/0x230 ? __pfx_skb_queue_purge_reason.part.0+0x10/0x10 ? mark_lock.part.0+0x8a/0x520 ...
trace_drop_common() also disables interrupts, but this is a minor issue because we could easily replace it with a local_lock.
Replace the spin_lock with raw_spin_lock to avoid sleeping in atomic context.(CVE-2024-40980)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
batman-adv: bypass empty buckets in batadv_purge_orig_ref()
Many syzbot reports are pointing to soft lockups in batadv_purge_orig_ref() [1]
Root cause is unknown, but we can avoid spending too much time there and perhaps get more interesting reports.
[1]
watchdog: BUG: soft lockup - CPU#0 stuck for 27s! [kworker/u4:6:621] Modules linked in: irq event stamp: 6182794 hardirqs last enabled at (6182793): [<ffff8000801dae10>] __local_bh_enable_ip+0x224/0x44c kernel/softirq.c:386 hardirqs last disabled at (6182794): [<ffff80008ad66a78>] __el1_irq arch/arm64/kernel/entry-common.c:533 [inline] hardirqs last disabled at (6182794): [<ffff80008ad66a78>] el1_interrupt+0x24/0x68 arch/arm64/kernel/entry-common.c:551 softirqs last enabled at (6182792): [<ffff80008aab71c4>] spin_unlock_bh include/linux/spinlock.h:396 [inline] softirqs last enabled at (6182792): [<ffff80008aab71c4>] batadv_purge_orig_ref+0x114c/0x1228 net/batman-adv/originator.c:1287 softirqs last disabled at (6182790): [<ffff80008aab61dc>] spin_lock_bh include/linux/spinlock.h:356 [inline] softirqs last disabled at (6182790): [<ffff80008aab61dc>] batadv_purge_orig_ref+0x164/0x1228 net/batman-adv/originator.c:1271 CPU: 0 PID: 621 Comm: kworker/u4:6 Not tainted 6.8.0-rc7-syzkaller-g707081b61156 #0 Hardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 02/29/2024 Workqueue: bat_events batadv_purge_orig pstate: 80400005 (Nzcv daif +PAN -UAO -TCO -DIT -SSBS BTYPE=--) pc : should_resched arch/arm64/include/asm/preempt.h:79 [inline] pc : __local_bh_enable_ip+0x228/0x44c kernel/softirq.c:388 lr : __local_bh_enable_ip+0x224/0x44c kernel/softirq.c:386 sp : ffff800099007970 x29: ffff800099007980 x28: 1fffe00018fce1bd x27: dfff800000000000 x26: ffff0000d2620008 x25: ffff0000c7e70de8 x24: 0000000000000001 x23: 1fffe00018e57781 x22: dfff800000000000 x21: ffff80008aab71c4 x20: ffff0001b40136c0 x19: ffff0000c72bbc08 x18: 1fffe0001a817bb0 x17: ffff800125414000 x16: ffff80008032116c x15: 0000000000000001 x14: 1fffe0001ee9d610 x13: 0000000000000000 x12: 0000000000000003 x11: 0000000000000000 x10: 0000000000ff0100 x9 : 0000000000000000 x8 : 00000000005e5789 x7 : ffff80008aab61dc x6 : 0000000000000000 x5 : 0000000000000000 x4 : 0000000000000001 x3 : 0000000000000000 x2 : 0000000000000006 x1 : 0000000000000080 x0 : ffff800125414000 Call trace: __daif_local_irq_enable arch/arm64/include/asm/irqflags.h:27 [inline] arch_local_irq_enable arch/arm64/include/asm/irqflags.h:49 [inline] __local_bh_enable_ip+0x228/0x44c kernel/softirq.c:386 __raw_spin_unlock_bh include/linux/spinlock_api_smp.h:167 [inline] _raw_spin_unlock_bh+0x3c/0x4c kernel/locking/spinlock.c:210 spin_unlock_bh include/linux/spinlock.h:396 [inline] batadv_purge_orig_ref+0x114c/0x1228 net/batman-adv/originator.c:1287 batadv_purge_orig+0x20/0x70 net/batman-adv/originator.c:1300 process_one_work+0x694/0x1204 kernel/workqueue.c:2633 process_scheduled_works kernel/workqueue.c:2706 [inline] worker_thread+0x938/0xef4 kernel/workqueue.c:2787 kthread+0x288/0x310 kernel/kthread.c:388 ret_from_fork+0x10/0x20 arch/arm64/kernel/entry.S:860 Sending NMI from CPU 0 to CPUs 1: NMI backtrace for cpu 1 CPU: 1 PID: 0 Comm: swapper/1 Not tainted 6.8.0-rc7-syzkaller-g707081b61156 #0 Hardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 02/29/2024 pstate: 80400005 (Nzcv daif +PAN -UAO -TCO -DIT -SSBS BTYPE=--) pc : arch_local_irq_enable+0x8/0xc arch/arm64/include/asm/irqflags.h:51 lr : default_idle_call+0xf8/0x128 kernel/sched/idle.c:103 sp : ffff800093a17d30 x29: ffff800093a17d30 x28: dfff800000000000 x27: 1ffff00012742fb4 x26: ffff80008ec9d000 x25: 0000000000000000 x24: 0000000000000002 x23: 1ffff00011d93a74 x22: ffff80008ec9d3a0 x21: 0000000000000000 x20: ffff0000c19dbc00 x19: ffff8000802d0fd8 x18: 1fffe00036804396 x17: ffff80008ec9d000 x16: ffff8000802d089c x15: 0000000000000001 ---truncated---(CVE-2024-40981)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
ssb: Fix potential NULL pointer dereference in ssb_device_uevent()
The ssb_device_uevent() function first attempts to convert the 'dev' pointer to 'struct ssb_device *'. However, it mistakenly dereferences 'dev' before performing the NULL check, potentially leading to a NULL pointer dereference if 'dev' is NULL.
To fix this issue, move the NULL check before dereferencing the 'dev' pointer, ensuring that the pointer is valid before attempting to use it.
Found by Linux Verification Center (linuxtesting.org) with SVACE.(CVE-2024-40982)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
net/sched: act_api: fix possible infinite loop in tcf_idr_check_alloc()
syzbot found hanging tasks waiting on rtnl_lock [1]
A reproducer is available in the syzbot bug.
When a request to add multiple actions with the same index is sent, the second request will block forever on the first request. This holds rtnl_lock, and causes tasks to hang.
Return -EAGAIN to prevent infinite looping, while keeping documented behavior.
[1]
INFO: task kworker/1:0:5088 blocked for more than 143 seconds. Not tainted 6.9.0-rc4-syzkaller-00173-g3cdb45594619 #0 "echo 0 > /proc/sys/kernel/hung_task_timeout_secs" disables this message. task:kworker/1:0 state:D stack:23744 pid:5088 tgid:5088 ppid:2 flags:0x00004000 Workqueue: events_power_efficient reg_check_chans_work Call Trace: <TASK> context_switch kernel/sched/core.c:5409 [inline] __schedule+0xf15/0x5d00 kernel/sched/core.c:6746 __schedule_loop kernel/sched/core.c:6823 [inline] schedule+0xe7/0x350 kernel/sched/core.c:6838 schedule_preempt_disabled+0x13/0x30 kernel/sched/core.c:6895 __mutex_lock_common kernel/locking/mutex.c:684 [inline] __mutex_lock+0x5b8/0x9c0 kernel/locking/mutex.c:752 wiphy_lock include/net/cfg80211.h:5953 [inline] reg_leave_invalid_chans net/wireless/reg.c:2466 [inline] reg_check_chans_work+0x10a/0x10e0 net/wireless/reg.c:2481(CVE-2024-40995)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
drm/amdkfd: don't allow mapping the MMIO HDP page with large pages
We don't get the right offset in that case. The GPU has an unused 4K area of the register BAR space into which you can remap registers. We remap the HDP flush registers into this space to allow userspace (CPU or GPU) to flush the HDP when it updates VRAM. However, on systems with >4K pages, we end up exposing PAGE_SIZE of MMIO space.(CVE-2024-41011)
| URL | Type | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
{
"affected": [
{
"ecosystem_specific": {
"aarch64": [
"kernel-debuginfo-5.10.0-221.0.0.124.oe2203sp3.aarch64.rpm",
"kernel-tools-5.10.0-221.0.0.124.oe2203sp3.aarch64.rpm",
"kernel-devel-5.10.0-221.0.0.124.oe2203sp3.aarch64.rpm",
"kernel-tools-devel-5.10.0-221.0.0.124.oe2203sp3.aarch64.rpm",
"perf-debuginfo-5.10.0-221.0.0.124.oe2203sp3.aarch64.rpm",
"kernel-5.10.0-221.0.0.124.oe2203sp3.aarch64.rpm",
"kernel-source-5.10.0-221.0.0.124.oe2203sp3.aarch64.rpm",
"kernel-tools-debuginfo-5.10.0-221.0.0.124.oe2203sp3.aarch64.rpm",
"kernel-debugsource-5.10.0-221.0.0.124.oe2203sp3.aarch64.rpm",
"python3-perf-5.10.0-221.0.0.124.oe2203sp3.aarch64.rpm",
"python3-perf-debuginfo-5.10.0-221.0.0.124.oe2203sp3.aarch64.rpm",
"kernel-headers-5.10.0-221.0.0.124.oe2203sp3.aarch64.rpm",
"perf-5.10.0-221.0.0.124.oe2203sp3.aarch64.rpm"
],
"src": [
"kernel-5.10.0-221.0.0.124.oe2203sp3.src.rpm"
],
"x86_64": [
"kernel-tools-devel-5.10.0-221.0.0.124.oe2203sp3.x86_64.rpm",
"python3-perf-debuginfo-5.10.0-221.0.0.124.oe2203sp3.x86_64.rpm",
"kernel-debugsource-5.10.0-221.0.0.124.oe2203sp3.x86_64.rpm",
"perf-debuginfo-5.10.0-221.0.0.124.oe2203sp3.x86_64.rpm",
"kernel-devel-5.10.0-221.0.0.124.oe2203sp3.x86_64.rpm",
"kernel-5.10.0-221.0.0.124.oe2203sp3.x86_64.rpm",
"perf-5.10.0-221.0.0.124.oe2203sp3.x86_64.rpm",
"kernel-headers-5.10.0-221.0.0.124.oe2203sp3.x86_64.rpm",
"python3-perf-5.10.0-221.0.0.124.oe2203sp3.x86_64.rpm",
"kernel-debuginfo-5.10.0-221.0.0.124.oe2203sp3.x86_64.rpm",
"kernel-tools-5.10.0-221.0.0.124.oe2203sp3.x86_64.rpm",
"kernel-tools-debuginfo-5.10.0-221.0.0.124.oe2203sp3.x86_64.rpm",
"kernel-source-5.10.0-221.0.0.124.oe2203sp3.x86_64.rpm"
]
},
"package": {
"ecosystem": "openEuler:22.03-LTS-SP3",
"name": "kernel",
"purl": "pkg:rpm/openEuler/kernel\u0026distro=openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "0"
},
{
"fixed": "5.10.0-221.0.0.124.oe2203sp3"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
}
],
"database_specific": {
"severity": "High"
},
"details": "The Linux Kernel, the operating system core itself.\r\n\r\nSecurity Fix(es):\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nclk: sunxi-ng: Unregister clocks/resets when unbinding\r\n\r\nCurrently, unbinding a CCU driver unmaps the device\u0026apos;s MMIO region, while\nleaving its clocks/resets and their providers registered. This can cause\na page fault later when some clock operation tries to perform MMIO. Fix\nthis by separating the CCU initialization from the memory allocation,\nand then using a devres callback to unregister the clocks and resets.\r\n\r\nThis also fixes a memory leak of the `struct ccu_reset`, and uses the\ncorrect owner (the specific platform driver) for the clocks and resets.\r\n\r\nEarly OF clock providers are never unregistered, and limited error\nhandling is possible, so they are mostly unchanged. The error reporting\nis made more consistent by moving the message inside of_sunxi_ccu_probe.(CVE-2021-47205)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nthermal/int340x_thermal: handle data_vault when the value is ZERO_SIZE_PTR\r\n\r\nIn some case, the GDDV returns a package with a buffer which has\nzero length. It causes that kmemdup() returns ZERO_SIZE_PTR (0x10).\r\n\r\nThen the data_vault_read() got NULL point dereference problem when\naccessing the 0x10 value in data_vault.\r\n\r\n[ 71.024560] BUG: kernel NULL pointer dereference, address:\n0000000000000010\r\n\r\nThis patch uses ZERO_OR_NULL_PTR() for checking ZERO_SIZE_PTR or\nNULL value in data_vault.(CVE-2022-48703)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nnet: marvell: prestera: Add missing of_node_put() in prestera_switch_set_base_mac_addr\r\n\r\nThis node pointer is returned by of_find_compatible_node() with\nrefcount incremented. Calling of_node_put() to aovid the refcount leak.(CVE-2022-48859)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nof: Fix double free in of_parse_phandle_with_args_map\r\n\r\nIn of_parse_phandle_with_args_map() the inner loop that\niterates through the map entries calls of_node_put(new)\nto free the reference acquired by the previous iteration\nof the inner loop. This assumes that the value of \u0026quot;new\u0026quot; is\nNULL on the first iteration of the inner loop.\r\n\r\nMake sure that this is true in all iterations of the outer\nloop by setting \u0026quot;new\u0026quot; to NULL after its value is assigned to \u0026quot;cur\u0026quot;.\r\n\r\nExtend the unittest to detect the double free and add an additional\ntest case that actually triggers this path.(CVE-2023-52679)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nmedia: gspca: cpia1: shift-out-of-bounds in set_flicker\r\n\r\nSyzkaller reported the following issue:\nUBSAN: shift-out-of-bounds in drivers/media/usb/gspca/cpia1.c:1031:27\nshift exponent 245 is too large for 32-bit type \u0026apos;int\u0026apos;\r\n\r\nWhen the value of the variable \u0026quot;sd-\u0026gt;params.exposure.gain\u0026quot; exceeds the\nnumber of bits in an integer, a shift-out-of-bounds error is reported. It\nis triggered because the variable \u0026quot;currentexp\u0026quot; cannot be left-shifted by\nmore than the number of bits in an integer. In order to avoid invalid\nrange during left-shift, the conditional expression is added.(CVE-2023-52764)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\ninit/main.c: Fix potential static_command_line memory overflow\r\n\r\nWe allocate memory of size \u0026apos;xlen + strlen(boot_command_line) + 1\u0026apos; for\nstatic_command_line, but the strings copied into static_command_line are\nextra_command_line and command_line, rather than extra_command_line and\nboot_command_line.\r\n\r\nWhen strlen(command_line) \u0026gt; strlen(boot_command_line), static_command_line\nwill overflow.\r\n\r\nThis patch just recovers strlen(command_line) which was miss-consolidated\nwith strlen(boot_command_line) in the commit f5c7310ac73e (\u0026quot;init/main: add\nchecks for the return value of memblock_alloc*()\u0026quot;)(CVE-2024-26988)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nnetfilter: nf_tables: restore set elements when delete set fails\r\n\r\nFrom abort path, nft_mapelem_activate() needs to restore refcounters to\nthe original state. Currently, it uses the set-\u0026gt;ops-\u0026gt;walk() to iterate\nover these set elements. The existing set iterator skips inactive\nelements in the next generation, this does not work from the abort path\nto restore the original state since it has to skip active elements\ninstead (not inactive ones).\r\n\r\nThis patch moves the check for inactive elements to the set iterator\ncallback, then it reverses the logic for the .activate case which\nneeds to skip active elements.\r\n\r\nToggle next generation bit for elements when delete set command is\ninvoked and call nft_clear() from .activate (abort) path to restore the\nnext generation bit.\r\n\r\nThe splat below shows an object in mappings memleak:\r\n\r\n[43929.457523] ------------[ cut here ]------------\n[43929.457532] WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 1139 at include/net/netfilter/nf_tables.h:1237 nft_setelem_data_deactivate+0xe4/0xf0 [nf_tables]\n[...]\n[43929.458014] RIP: 0010:nft_setelem_data_deactivate+0xe4/0xf0 [nf_tables]\n[43929.458076] Code: 83 f8 01 77 ab 49 8d 7c 24 08 e8 37 5e d0 de 49 8b 6c 24 08 48 8d 7d 50 e8 e9 5c d0 de 8b 45 50 8d 50 ff 89 55 50 85 c0 75 86 \u0026lt;0f\u0026gt; 0b eb 82 0f 0b eb b3 0f 1f 40 00 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90\n[43929.458081] RSP: 0018:ffff888140f9f4b0 EFLAGS: 00010246\n[43929.458086] RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: ffff8881434f5288 RCX: dffffc0000000000\n[43929.458090] RDX: 00000000ffffffff RSI: ffffffffa26d28a7 RDI: ffff88810ecc9550\n[43929.458093] RBP: ffff88810ecc9500 R08: 0000000000000001 R09: ffffed10281f3e8f\n[43929.458096] R10: 0000000000000003 R11: ffff0000ffff0000 R12: ffff8881434f52a0\n[43929.458100] R13: ffff888140f9f5f4 R14: ffff888151c7a800 R15: 0000000000000002\n[43929.458103] FS: 00007f0c687c4740(0000) GS:ffff888390800000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000\n[43929.458107] CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033\n[43929.458111] CR2: 00007f58dbe5b008 CR3: 0000000123602005 CR4: 00000000001706f0\n[43929.458114] Call Trace:\n[43929.458118] \u0026lt;TASK\u0026gt;\n[43929.458121] ? __warn+0x9f/0x1a0\n[43929.458127] ? nft_setelem_data_deactivate+0xe4/0xf0 [nf_tables]\n[43929.458188] ? report_bug+0x1b1/0x1e0\n[43929.458196] ? handle_bug+0x3c/0x70\n[43929.458200] ? exc_invalid_op+0x17/0x40\n[43929.458211] ? nft_setelem_data_deactivate+0xd7/0xf0 [nf_tables]\n[43929.458271] ? nft_setelem_data_deactivate+0xe4/0xf0 [nf_tables]\n[43929.458332] nft_mapelem_deactivate+0x24/0x30 [nf_tables]\n[43929.458392] nft_rhash_walk+0xdd/0x180 [nf_tables]\n[43929.458453] ? __pfx_nft_rhash_walk+0x10/0x10 [nf_tables]\n[43929.458512] ? rb_insert_color+0x2e/0x280\n[43929.458520] nft_map_deactivate+0xdc/0x1e0 [nf_tables]\n[43929.458582] ? __pfx_nft_map_deactivate+0x10/0x10 [nf_tables]\n[43929.458642] ? __pfx_nft_mapelem_deactivate+0x10/0x10 [nf_tables]\n[43929.458701] ? __rcu_read_unlock+0x46/0x70\n[43929.458709] nft_delset+0xff/0x110 [nf_tables]\n[43929.458769] nft_flush_table+0x16f/0x460 [nf_tables]\n[43929.458830] nf_tables_deltable+0x501/0x580 [nf_tables](CVE-2024-27012)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nf2fs: fix to avoid potential panic during recovery\r\n\r\nDuring recovery, if FAULT_BLOCK is on, it is possible that\nf2fs_reserve_new_block() will return -ENOSPC during recovery,\nthen it may trigger panic.\r\n\r\nAlso, if fault injection rate is 1 and only FAULT_BLOCK fault\ntype is on, it may encounter deadloop in loop of block reservation.\r\n\r\nLet\u0026apos;s change as below to fix these issues:\n- remove bug_on() to avoid panic.\n- limit the loop count of block reservation to avoid potential\ndeadloop.(CVE-2024-27032)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nclk: Fix clk_core_get NULL dereference\r\n\r\nIt is possible for clk_core_get to dereference a NULL in the following\nsequence:\r\n\r\nclk_core_get()\n of_clk_get_hw_from_clkspec()\n __of_clk_get_hw_from_provider()\n __clk_get_hw()\r\n\r\n__clk_get_hw() can return NULL which is dereferenced by clk_core_get() at\nhw-\u0026gt;core.\r\n\r\nPrior to commit dde4eff47c82 (\u0026quot;clk: Look for parents with clkdev based\nclk_lookups\u0026quot;) the check IS_ERR_OR_NULL() was performed which would have\ncaught the NULL.\r\n\r\nReading the description of this function it talks about returning NULL but\nthat cannot be so at the moment.\r\n\r\nUpdate the function to check for hw before dereferencing it and return NULL\nif hw is NULL.(CVE-2024-27038)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nnet: phy: fix phy_get_internal_delay accessing an empty array\r\n\r\nThe phy_get_internal_delay function could try to access to an empty\narray in the case that the driver is calling phy_get_internal_delay\nwithout defining delay_values and rx-internal-delay-ps or\ntx-internal-delay-ps is defined to 0 in the device-tree.\nThis will lead to \u0026quot;unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at\nvirtual address 0\u0026quot;. To avoid this kernel oops, the test should be delay\n\u0026gt;= 0. As there is already delay \u0026lt; 0 test just before, the test could\nonly be size == 0.(CVE-2024-27047)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nwifi: rtl8xxxu: add cancel_work_sync() for c2hcmd_work\r\n\r\nThe workqueue might still be running, when the driver is stopped. To\navoid a use-after-free, call cancel_work_sync() in rtl8xxxu_stop().(CVE-2024-27052)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nnetfilter: nf_tables: do not compare internal table flags on updates\r\n\r\nRestore skipping transaction if table update does not modify flags.(CVE-2024-27065)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\npower: supply: bq27xxx-i2c: Do not free non existing IRQ\r\n\r\nThe bq27xxx i2c-client may not have an IRQ, in which case\nclient-\u0026gt;irq will be 0. bq27xxx_battery_i2c_probe() already has\nan if (client-\u0026gt;irq) check wrapping the request_threaded_irq().\r\n\r\nBut bq27xxx_battery_i2c_remove() unconditionally calls\nfree_irq(client-\u0026gt;irq) leading to:\r\n\r\n[ 190.310742] ------------[ cut here ]------------\n[ 190.310843] Trying to free already-free IRQ 0\n[ 190.310861] WARNING: CPU: 2 PID: 1304 at kernel/irq/manage.c:1893 free_irq+0x1b8/0x310\r\n\r\nFollowed by a backtrace when unbinding the driver. Add\nan if (client-\u0026gt;irq) to bq27xxx_battery_i2c_remove() mirroring\nprobe() to fix this.(CVE-2024-27412)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nBluetooth: hci_event: Fix handling of HCI_EV_IO_CAPA_REQUEST\r\n\r\nIf we received HCI_EV_IO_CAPA_REQUEST while\nHCI_OP_READ_REMOTE_EXT_FEATURES is yet to be responded assume the remote\ndoes support SSP since otherwise this event shouldn\u0026apos;t be generated.(CVE-2024-27416)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\ndma-mapping: benchmark: fix node id validation\r\n\r\nWhile validating node ids in map_benchmark_ioctl(), node_possible() may\nbe provided with invalid argument outside of [0,MAX_NUMNODES-1] range\nleading to:\r\n\r\nBUG: KASAN: wild-memory-access in map_benchmark_ioctl (kernel/dma/map_benchmark.c:214)\nRead of size 8 at addr 1fffffff8ccb6398 by task dma_map_benchma/971\nCPU: 7 PID: 971 Comm: dma_map_benchma Not tainted 6.9.0-rc6 #37\nHardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996)\nCall Trace:\n \u0026lt;TASK\u0026gt;\ndump_stack_lvl (lib/dump_stack.c:117)\nkasan_report (mm/kasan/report.c:603)\nkasan_check_range (mm/kasan/generic.c:189)\nvariable_test_bit (arch/x86/include/asm/bitops.h:227) [inline]\narch_test_bit (arch/x86/include/asm/bitops.h:239) [inline]\n_test_bit at (include/asm-generic/bitops/instrumented-non-atomic.h:142) [inline]\nnode_state (include/linux/nodemask.h:423) [inline]\nmap_benchmark_ioctl (kernel/dma/map_benchmark.c:214)\nfull_proxy_unlocked_ioctl (fs/debugfs/file.c:333)\n__x64_sys_ioctl (fs/ioctl.c:890)\ndo_syscall_64 (arch/x86/entry/common.c:83)\nentry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe (arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:130)\r\n\r\nCompare node ids with sane bounds first. NUMA_NO_NODE is considered a\nspecial valid case meaning that benchmarking kthreads won\u0026apos;t be bound to a\ncpuset of a given node.\r\n\r\nFound by Linux Verification Center (linuxtesting.org).(CVE-2024-34777)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nnet: mvpp2: clear BM pool before initialization\r\n\r\nRegister value persist after booting the kernel using\nkexec which results in kernel panic. Thus clear the\nBM pool registers before initialisation to fix the issue.(CVE-2024-35837)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\ndrm/amdgpu: Skip do PCI error slot reset during RAS recovery\r\n\r\nWhy:\n The PCI error slot reset maybe triggered after inject ue to UMC multi times, this\n caused system hang.\n [ 557.371857] amdgpu 0000:af:00.0: amdgpu: GPU reset succeeded, trying to resume\n [ 557.373718] [drm] PCIE GART of 512M enabled.\n [ 557.373722] [drm] PTB located at 0x0000031FED700000\n [ 557.373788] [drm] VRAM is lost due to GPU reset!\n [ 557.373789] [drm] PSP is resuming...\n [ 557.547012] mlx5_core 0000:55:00.0: mlx5_pci_err_detected Device state = 1 pci_status: 0. Exit, result = 3, need reset\n [ 557.547067] [drm] PCI error: detected callback, state(1)!!\n [ 557.547069] [drm] No support for XGMI hive yet...\n [ 557.548125] mlx5_core 0000:55:00.0: mlx5_pci_slot_reset Device state = 1 pci_status: 0. Enter\n [ 557.607763] mlx5_core 0000:55:00.0: wait vital counter value 0x16b5b after 1 iterations\n [ 557.607777] mlx5_core 0000:55:00.0: mlx5_pci_slot_reset Device state = 1 pci_status: 1. Exit, err = 0, result = 5, recovered\n [ 557.610492] [drm] PCI error: slot reset callback!!\n ...\n [ 560.689382] amdgpu 0000:3f:00.0: amdgpu: GPU reset(2) succeeded!\n [ 560.689546] amdgpu 0000:5a:00.0: amdgpu: GPU reset(2) succeeded!\n [ 560.689562] general protection fault, probably for non-canonical address 0x5f080b54534f611f: 0000 [#1] SMP NOPTI\n [ 560.701008] CPU: 16 PID: 2361 Comm: kworker/u448:9 Tainted: G OE 5.15.0-91-generic #101-Ubuntu\n [ 560.712057] Hardware name: Microsoft C278A/C278A, BIOS C2789.5.BS.1C11.AG.1 11/08/2023\n [ 560.720959] Workqueue: amdgpu-reset-hive amdgpu_ras_do_recovery [amdgpu]\n [ 560.728887] RIP: 0010:amdgpu_device_gpu_recover.cold+0xbf1/0xcf5 [amdgpu]\n [ 560.736891] Code: ff 41 89 c6 e9 1b ff ff ff 44 0f b6 45 b0 e9 4f ff ff ff be 01 00 00 00 4c 89 e7 e8 76 c9 8b ff 44 0f b6 45 b0 e9 3c fd ff ff \u0026lt;48\u0026gt; 83 ba 18 02 00 00 00 0f 84 6a f8 ff ff 48 8d 7a 78 be 01 00 00\n [ 560.757967] RSP: 0018:ffa0000032e53d80 EFLAGS: 00010202\n [ 560.763848] RAX: ffa00000001dfd10 RBX: ffa0000000197090 RCX: ffa0000032e53db0\n [ 560.771856] RDX: 5f080b54534f5f07 RSI: 0000000000000000 RDI: ff11000128100010\n [ 560.779867] RBP: ffa0000032e53df0 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: ffffffffffe77f08\n [ 560.787879] R10: 0000000000ffff0a R11: 0000000000000001 R12: 0000000000000000\n [ 560.795889] R13: ffa0000032e53e00 R14: 0000000000000000 R15: 0000000000000000\n [ 560.803889] FS: 0000000000000000(0000) GS:ff11007e7e800000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000\n [ 560.812973] CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033\n [ 560.819422] CR2: 000055a04c118e68 CR3: 0000000007410005 CR4: 0000000000771ee0\n [ 560.827433] DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000\n [ 560.835433] DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe07f0 DR7: 0000000000000400\n [ 560.843444] PKRU: 55555554\n [ 560.846480] Call Trace:\n [ 560.849225] \u0026lt;TASK\u0026gt;\n [ 560.851580] ? show_trace_log_lvl+0x1d6/0x2ea\n [ 560.856488] ? show_trace_log_lvl+0x1d6/0x2ea\n [ 560.861379] ? amdgpu_ras_do_recovery+0x1b2/0x210 [amdgpu]\n [ 560.867778] ? show_regs.part.0+0x23/0x29\n [ 560.872293] ? __die_body.cold+0x8/0xd\n [ 560.876502] ? die_addr+0x3e/0x60\n [ 560.880238] ? exc_general_protection+0x1c5/0x410\n [ 560.885532] ? asm_exc_general_protection+0x27/0x30\n [ 560.891025] ? amdgpu_device_gpu_recover.cold+0xbf1/0xcf5 [amdgpu]\n [ 560.898323] amdgpu_ras_do_recovery+0x1b2/0x210 [amdgpu]\n [ 560.904520] process_one_work+0x228/0x3d0\nHow:\n In RAS recovery, mode-1 reset is issued from RAS fatal error handling and expected\n all the nodes in a hive to be reset. no need to issue another mode-1 during this procedure.(CVE-2024-35931)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nfs/9p: fix uninitialized values during inode evict\r\n\r\nIf an iget fails due to not being able to retrieve information\nfrom the server then the inode structure is only partially\ninitialized. When the inode gets evicted, references to\nuninitialized structures (like fscache cookies) were being\nmade.\r\n\r\nThis patch checks for a bad_inode before doing anything other\nthan clearing the inode from the cache. Since the inode is\nbad, it shouldn\u0026apos;t have any state associated with it that needs\nto be written back (and there really isn\u0026apos;t a way to complete\nthose anyways).(CVE-2024-36923)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nnilfs2: fix potential kernel bug due to lack of writeback flag waiting\r\n\r\nDestructive writes to a block device on which nilfs2 is mounted can cause\na kernel bug in the folio/page writeback start routine or writeback end\nroutine (__folio_start_writeback in the log below):\r\n\r\n kernel BUG at mm/page-writeback.c:3070!\n Oops: invalid opcode: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP KASAN PTI\n ...\n RIP: 0010:__folio_start_writeback+0xbaa/0x10e0\n Code: 25 ff 0f 00 00 0f 84 18 01 00 00 e8 40 ca c6 ff e9 17 f6 ff ff\n e8 36 ca c6 ff 4c 89 f7 48 c7 c6 80 c0 12 84 e8 e7 b3 0f 00 90 \u0026lt;0f\u0026gt;\n 0b e8 1f ca c6 ff 4c 89 f7 48 c7 c6 a0 c6 12 84 e8 d0 b3 0f 00\n ...\n Call Trace:\n \u0026lt;TASK\u0026gt;\n nilfs_segctor_do_construct+0x4654/0x69d0 [nilfs2]\n nilfs_segctor_construct+0x181/0x6b0 [nilfs2]\n nilfs_segctor_thread+0x548/0x11c0 [nilfs2]\n kthread+0x2f0/0x390\n ret_from_fork+0x4b/0x80\n ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30\n \u0026lt;/TASK\u0026gt;\r\n\r\nThis is because when the log writer starts a writeback for segment summary\nblocks or a super root block that use the backing device\u0026apos;s page cache, it\ndoes not wait for the ongoing folio/page writeback, resulting in an\ninconsistent writeback state.\r\n\r\nFix this issue by waiting for ongoing writebacks when putting\nfolios/pages on the backing device into writeback state.(CVE-2024-37078)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\ndrm: bridge: cdns-mhdp8546: Fix possible null pointer dereference\r\n\r\nIn cdns_mhdp_atomic_enable(), the return value of drm_mode_duplicate() is\nassigned to mhdp_state-\u0026gt;current_mode, and there is a dereference of it in\ndrm_mode_set_name(), which will lead to a NULL pointer dereference on\nfailure of drm_mode_duplicate().\r\n\r\nFix this bug add a check of mhdp_state-\u0026gt;current_mode.(CVE-2024-38548)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nwifi: carl9170: add a proper sanity check for endpoints\r\n\r\nSyzkaller reports [1] hitting a warning which is caused by presence\nof a wrong endpoint type at the URB sumbitting stage. While there\nwas a check for a specific 4th endpoint, since it can switch types\nbetween bulk and interrupt, other endpoints are trusted implicitly.\nSimilar warning is triggered in a couple of other syzbot issues [2].\r\n\r\nFix the issue by doing a comprehensive check of all endpoints\ntaking into account difference between high- and full-speed\nconfiguration.\r\n\r\n[1] Syzkaller report:\n...\nWARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 4721 at drivers/usb/core/urb.c:504 usb_submit_urb+0xed6/0x1880 drivers/usb/core/urb.c:504\n...\nCall Trace:\n \u0026lt;TASK\u0026gt;\n carl9170_usb_send_rx_irq_urb+0x273/0x340 drivers/net/wireless/ath/carl9170/usb.c:504\n carl9170_usb_init_device drivers/net/wireless/ath/carl9170/usb.c:939 [inline]\n carl9170_usb_firmware_finish drivers/net/wireless/ath/carl9170/usb.c:999 [inline]\n carl9170_usb_firmware_step2+0x175/0x240 drivers/net/wireless/ath/carl9170/usb.c:1028\n request_firmware_work_func+0x130/0x240 drivers/base/firmware_loader/main.c:1107\n process_one_work+0x9bf/0x1710 kernel/workqueue.c:2289\n worker_thread+0x669/0x1090 kernel/workqueue.c:2436\n kthread+0x2e8/0x3a0 kernel/kthread.c:376\n ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x30 arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:308\n \u0026lt;/TASK\u0026gt;\r\n\r\n[2] Related syzkaller crashes:(CVE-2024-38567)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nmacintosh/via-macii: Fix \u0026quot;BUG: sleeping function called from invalid context\u0026quot;\r\n\r\nThe via-macii ADB driver calls request_irq() after disabling hard\ninterrupts. But disabling interrupts isn\u0026apos;t necessary here because the\nVIA shift register interrupt was masked during VIA1 initialization.(CVE-2024-38607)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nmedia: i2c: et8ek8: Don\u0026apos;t strip remove function when driver is builtin\r\n\r\nUsing __exit for the remove function results in the remove callback\nbeing discarded with CONFIG_VIDEO_ET8EK8=y. When such a device gets\nunbound (e.g. using sysfs or hotplug), the driver is just removed\nwithout the cleanup being performed. This results in resource leaks. Fix\nit by compiling in the remove callback unconditionally.\r\n\r\nThis also fixes a W=1 modpost warning:\r\n\r\n\tWARNING: modpost: drivers/media/i2c/et8ek8/et8ek8: section mismatch in reference: et8ek8_i2c_driver+0x10 (section: .data) -\u0026gt; et8ek8_remove (section: .exit.text)(CVE-2024-38611)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\ndrm/amdgpu: add error handle to avoid out-of-bounds\r\n\r\nif the sdma_v4_0_irq_id_to_seq return -EINVAL, the process should\nbe stop to avoid out-of-bounds read, so directly return -EINVAL.(CVE-2024-39471)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nfbdev: savage: Handle err return when savagefb_check_var failed\r\n\r\nThe commit 04e5eac8f3ab(\u0026quot;fbdev: savage: Error out if pixclock equals zero\u0026quot;)\nchecks the value of pixclock to avoid divide-by-zero error. However\nthe function savagefb_probe doesn\u0026apos;t handle the error return of\nsavagefb_check_var. When pixclock is 0, it will cause divide-by-zero error.(CVE-2024-39475)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nmd/raid5: fix deadlock that raid5d() wait for itself to clear MD_SB_CHANGE_PENDING\r\n\r\nXiao reported that lvm2 test lvconvert-raid-takeover.sh can hang with\nsmall possibility, the root cause is exactly the same as commit\nbed9e27baf52 (\u0026quot;Revert \u0026quot;md/raid5: Wait for MD_SB_CHANGE_PENDING in raid5d\u0026quot;\u0026quot;)\r\n\r\nHowever, Dan reported another hang after that, and junxiao investigated\nthe problem and found out that this is caused by plugged bio can\u0026apos;t issue\nfrom raid5d().\r\n\r\nCurrent implementation in raid5d() has a weird dependence:\r\n\r\n1) md_check_recovery() from raid5d() must hold \u0026apos;reconfig_mutex\u0026apos; to clear\n MD_SB_CHANGE_PENDING;\n2) raid5d() handles IO in a deadloop, until all IO are issued;\n3) IO from raid5d() must wait for MD_SB_CHANGE_PENDING to be cleared;\r\n\r\nThis behaviour is introduce before v2.6, and for consequence, if other\ncontext hold \u0026apos;reconfig_mutex\u0026apos;, and md_check_recovery() can\u0026apos;t update\nsuper_block, then raid5d() will waste one cpu 100% by the deadloop, until\n\u0026apos;reconfig_mutex\u0026apos; is released.\r\n\r\nRefer to the implementation from raid1 and raid10, fix this problem by\nskipping issue IO if MD_SB_CHANGE_PENDING is still set after\nmd_check_recovery(), daemon thread will be woken up when \u0026apos;reconfig_mutex\u0026apos;\nis released. Meanwhile, the hang problem will be fixed as well.(CVE-2024-39476)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nmmc: davinci: Don\u0026apos;t strip remove function when driver is builtin\r\n\r\nUsing __exit for the remove function results in the remove callback being\ndiscarded with CONFIG_MMC_DAVINCI=y. When such a device gets unbound (e.g.\nusing sysfs or hotplug), the driver is just removed without the cleanup\nbeing performed. This results in resource leaks. Fix it by compiling in the\nremove callback unconditionally.\r\n\r\nThis also fixes a W=1 modpost warning:\r\n\r\nWARNING: modpost: drivers/mmc/host/davinci_mmc: section mismatch in\nreference: davinci_mmcsd_driver+0x10 (section: .data) -\u0026gt;\ndavinci_mmcsd_remove (section: .exit.text)(CVE-2024-39484)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nliquidio: Adjust a NULL pointer handling path in lio_vf_rep_copy_packet\r\n\r\nIn lio_vf_rep_copy_packet() pg_info-\u0026gt;page is compared to a NULL value,\nbut then it is unconditionally passed to skb_add_rx_frag() which looks\nstrange and could lead to null pointer dereference.\r\n\r\nlio_vf_rep_copy_packet() call trace looks like:\n\tocteon_droq_process_packets\n\t octeon_droq_fast_process_packets\n\t octeon_droq_dispatch_pkt\n\t octeon_create_recv_info\n\t ...search in the dispatch_list...\n\t -\u0026gt;disp_fn(rdisp-\u0026gt;rinfo, ...)\n\t lio_vf_rep_pkt_recv(struct octeon_recv_info *recv_info, ...)\nIn this path there is no code which sets pg_info-\u0026gt;page to NULL.\nSo this check looks unneeded and doesn\u0026apos;t solve potential problem.\nBut I guess the author had reason to add a check and I have no such card\nand can\u0026apos;t do real test.\nIn addition, the code in the function liquidio_push_packet() in\nliquidio/lio_core.c does exactly the same.\r\n\r\nBased on this, I consider the most acceptable compromise solution to\nadjust this issue by moving skb_add_rx_frag() into conditional scope.\r\n\r\nFound by Linux Verification Center (linuxtesting.org) with SVACE.(CVE-2024-39506)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nio_uring/io-wq: Use set_bit() and test_bit() at worker-\u0026gt;flags\r\n\r\nUtilize set_bit() and test_bit() on worker-\u0026gt;flags within io_uring/io-wq\nto address potential data races.\r\n\r\nThe structure io_worker-\u0026gt;flags may be accessed through various data\npaths, leading to concurrency issues. When KCSAN is enabled, it reveals\ndata races occurring in io_worker_handle_work and\nio_wq_activate_free_worker functions.\r\n\r\n\t BUG: KCSAN: data-race in io_worker_handle_work / io_wq_activate_free_worker\n\t write to 0xffff8885c4246404 of 4 bytes by task 49071 on cpu 28:\n\t io_worker_handle_work (io_uring/io-wq.c:434 io_uring/io-wq.c:569)\n\t io_wq_worker (io_uring/io-wq.c:?)\n\u0026lt;snip\u0026gt;\r\n\r\n\t read to 0xffff8885c4246404 of 4 bytes by task 49024 on cpu 5:\n\t io_wq_activate_free_worker (io_uring/io-wq.c:? io_uring/io-wq.c:285)\n\t io_wq_enqueue (io_uring/io-wq.c:947)\n\t io_queue_iowq (io_uring/io_uring.c:524)\n\t io_req_task_submit (io_uring/io_uring.c:1511)\n\t io_handle_tw_list (io_uring/io_uring.c:1198)\n\u0026lt;snip\u0026gt;\r\n\r\nLine numbers against commit 18daea77cca6 (\u0026quot;Merge tag \u0026apos;for-linus\u0026apos; of\ngit://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/virt/kvm/kvm\u0026quot;).\r\n\r\nThese races involve writes and reads to the same memory location by\ndifferent tasks running on different CPUs. To mitigate this, refactor\nthe code to use atomic operations such as set_bit(), test_bit(), and\nclear_bit() instead of basic \u0026quot;and\u0026quot; and \u0026quot;or\u0026quot; operations. This ensures\nthread-safe manipulation of worker flags.\r\n\r\nAlso, move `create_index` to avoid holes in the structure.(CVE-2024-39508)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nriscv: rewrite __kernel_map_pages() to fix sleeping in invalid context\r\n\r\n__kernel_map_pages() is a debug function which clears the valid bit in page\ntable entry for deallocated pages to detect illegal memory accesses to\nfreed pages.\r\n\r\nThis function set/clear the valid bit using __set_memory(). __set_memory()\nacquires init_mm\u0026apos;s semaphore, and this operation may sleep. This is\nproblematic, because __kernel_map_pages() can be called in atomic context,\nand thus is illegal to sleep. An example warning that this causes:\r\n\r\nBUG: sleeping function called from invalid context at kernel/locking/rwsem.c:1578\nin_atomic(): 1, irqs_disabled(): 0, non_block: 0, pid: 2, name: kthreadd\npreempt_count: 2, expected: 0\nCPU: 0 PID: 2 Comm: kthreadd Not tainted 6.9.0-g1d4c6d784ef6 #37\nHardware name: riscv-virtio,qemu (DT)\nCall Trace:\n[\u0026lt;ffffffff800060dc\u0026gt;] dump_backtrace+0x1c/0x24\n[\u0026lt;ffffffff8091ef6e\u0026gt;] show_stack+0x2c/0x38\n[\u0026lt;ffffffff8092baf8\u0026gt;] dump_stack_lvl+0x5a/0x72\n[\u0026lt;ffffffff8092bb24\u0026gt;] dump_stack+0x14/0x1c\n[\u0026lt;ffffffff8003b7ac\u0026gt;] __might_resched+0x104/0x10e\n[\u0026lt;ffffffff8003b7f4\u0026gt;] __might_sleep+0x3e/0x62\n[\u0026lt;ffffffff8093276a\u0026gt;] down_write+0x20/0x72\n[\u0026lt;ffffffff8000cf00\u0026gt;] __set_memory+0x82/0x2fa\n[\u0026lt;ffffffff8000d324\u0026gt;] __kernel_map_pages+0x5a/0xd4\n[\u0026lt;ffffffff80196cca\u0026gt;] __alloc_pages_bulk+0x3b2/0x43a\n[\u0026lt;ffffffff8018ee82\u0026gt;] __vmalloc_node_range+0x196/0x6ba\n[\u0026lt;ffffffff80011904\u0026gt;] copy_process+0x72c/0x17ec\n[\u0026lt;ffffffff80012ab4\u0026gt;] kernel_clone+0x60/0x2fe\n[\u0026lt;ffffffff80012f62\u0026gt;] kernel_thread+0x82/0xa0\n[\u0026lt;ffffffff8003552c\u0026gt;] kthreadd+0x14a/0x1be\n[\u0026lt;ffffffff809357de\u0026gt;] ret_from_fork+0xe/0x1c\r\n\r\nRewrite this function with apply_to_existing_page_range(). It is fine to\nnot have any locking, because __kernel_map_pages() works with pages being\nallocated/deallocated and those pages are not changed by anyone else in the\nmeantime.(CVE-2024-40915)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\niommu: Return right value in iommu_sva_bind_device()\r\n\r\niommu_sva_bind_device() should return either a sva bond handle or an\nERR_PTR value in error cases. Existing drivers (idxd and uacce) only\ncheck the return value with IS_ERR(). This could potentially lead to\na kernel NULL pointer dereference issue if the function returns NULL\ninstead of an error pointer.\r\n\r\nIn reality, this doesn\u0026apos;t cause any problems because iommu_sva_bind_device()\nonly returns NULL when the kernel is not configured with CONFIG_IOMMU_SVA.\nIn this case, iommu_dev_enable_feature(dev, IOMMU_DEV_FEAT_SVA) will\nreturn an error, and the device drivers won\u0026apos;t call iommu_sva_bind_device()\nat all.(CVE-2024-40945)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nima: Avoid blocking in RCU read-side critical section\r\n\r\nA panic happens in ima_match_policy:\r\n\r\nBUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at 0000000000000010\nPGD 42f873067 P4D 0\nOops: 0000 [#1] SMP NOPTI\nCPU: 5 PID: 1286325 Comm: kubeletmonit.sh\nKdump: loaded Tainted: P\nHardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996),\n BIOS 0.0.0 02/06/2015\nRIP: 0010:ima_match_policy+0x84/0x450\nCode: 49 89 fc 41 89 cf 31 ed 89 44 24 14 eb 1c 44 39\n 7b 18 74 26 41 83 ff 05 74 20 48 8b 1b 48 3b 1d\n f2 b9 f4 00 0f 84 9c 01 00 00 \u0026lt;44\u0026gt; 85 73 10 74 ea\n 44 8b 6b 14 41 f6 c5 01 75 d4 41 f6 c5 02 74 0f\nRSP: 0018:ff71570009e07a80 EFLAGS: 00010207\nRAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: 0000000000000000 RCX: 0000000000000200\nRDX: ffffffffad8dc7c0 RSI: 0000000024924925 RDI: ff3e27850dea2000\nRBP: 0000000000000000 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: ffffffffabfce739\nR10: ff3e27810cc42400 R11: 0000000000000000 R12: ff3e2781825ef970\nR13: 00000000ff3e2785 R14: 000000000000000c R15: 0000000000000001\nFS: 00007f5195b51740(0000)\nGS:ff3e278b12d40000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000\nCS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033\nCR2: 0000000000000010 CR3: 0000000626d24002 CR4: 0000000000361ee0\nDR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000\nDR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400\nCall Trace:\n ima_get_action+0x22/0x30\n process_measurement+0xb0/0x830\n ? page_add_file_rmap+0x15/0x170\n ? alloc_set_pte+0x269/0x4c0\n ? prep_new_page+0x81/0x140\n ? simple_xattr_get+0x75/0xa0\n ? selinux_file_open+0x9d/0xf0\n ima_file_check+0x64/0x90\n path_openat+0x571/0x1720\n do_filp_open+0x9b/0x110\n ? page_counter_try_charge+0x57/0xc0\n ? files_cgroup_alloc_fd+0x38/0x60\n ? __alloc_fd+0xd4/0x250\n ? do_sys_open+0x1bd/0x250\n do_sys_open+0x1bd/0x250\n do_syscall_64+0x5d/0x1d0\n entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x65/0xca\r\n\r\nCommit c7423dbdbc9e (\u0026quot;ima: Handle -ESTALE returned by\nima_filter_rule_match()\u0026quot;) introduced call to ima_lsm_copy_rule within a\nRCU read-side critical section which contains kmalloc with GFP_KERNEL.\nThis implies a possible sleep and violates limitations of RCU read-side\ncritical sections on non-PREEMPT systems.\r\n\r\nSleeping within RCU read-side critical section might cause\nsynchronize_rcu() returning early and break RCU protection, allowing a\nUAF to happen.\r\n\r\nThe root cause of this issue could be described as follows:\n|\tThread A\t|\tThread B\t|\n|\t\t\t|ima_match_policy\t|\n|\t\t\t| rcu_read_lock\t|\n|ima_lsm_update_rule\t|\t\t\t|\n| synchronize_rcu\t|\t\t\t|\n|\t\t\t| kmalloc(GFP_KERNEL)|\n|\t\t\t| sleep\t\t|\n==\u0026gt; synchronize_rcu returns early\n| kfree(entry)\t\t|\t\t\t|\n|\t\t\t| entry = entry-\u0026gt;next|\n==\u0026gt; UAF happens and entry now becomes NULL (or could be anything).\n|\t\t\t| entry-\u0026gt;action\t|\n==\u0026gt; Accessing entry might cause panic.\r\n\r\nTo fix this issue, we are converting all kmalloc that is called within\nRCU read-side critical section to use GFP_ATOMIC.\r\n\r\n[PM: fixed missing comment, long lines, !CONFIG_IMA_LSM_RULES case](CVE-2024-40947)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\ndmaengine: idxd: Fix possible Use-After-Free in irq_process_work_list\r\n\r\nUse list_for_each_entry_safe() to allow iterating through the list and\ndeleting the entry in the iteration process. The descriptor is freed via\nidxd_desc_complete() and there\u0026apos;s a slight chance may cause issue for\nthe list iterator when the descriptor is reused by another thread\nwithout it being deleted from the list.(CVE-2024-40956)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nipv6: prevent possible NULL dereference in rt6_probe()\r\n\r\nsyzbot caught a NULL dereference in rt6_probe() [1]\r\n\r\nBail out if __in6_dev_get() returns NULL.\r\n\r\n[1]\nOops: general protection fault, probably for non-canonical address 0xdffffc00000000cb: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP KASAN PTI\nKASAN: null-ptr-deref in range [0x0000000000000658-0x000000000000065f]\nCPU: 1 PID: 22444 Comm: syz-executor.0 Not tainted 6.10.0-rc2-syzkaller-00383-gb8481381d4e2 #0\nHardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 04/02/2024\n RIP: 0010:rt6_probe net/ipv6/route.c:656 [inline]\n RIP: 0010:find_match+0x8c4/0xf50 net/ipv6/route.c:758\nCode: 14 fd f7 48 8b 85 38 ff ff ff 48 c7 45 b0 00 00 00 00 48 8d b8 5c 06 00 00 48 b8 00 00 00 00 00 fc ff df 48 89 fa 48 c1 ea 03 \u0026lt;0f\u0026gt; b6 14 02 48 89 f8 83 e0 07 83 c0 03 38 d0 7c 08 84 d2 0f 85 19\nRSP: 0018:ffffc900034af070 EFLAGS: 00010203\nRAX: dffffc0000000000 RBX: 0000000000000000 RCX: ffffc90004521000\nRDX: 00000000000000cb RSI: ffffffff8990d0cd RDI: 000000000000065c\nRBP: ffffc900034af150 R08: 0000000000000005 R09: 0000000000000000\nR10: 0000000000000001 R11: 0000000000000002 R12: 000000000000000a\nR13: 1ffff92000695e18 R14: ffff8880244a1d20 R15: 0000000000000000\nFS: 00007f4844a5a6c0(0000) GS:ffff8880b9300000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000\nCS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033\nCR2: 0000001b31b27000 CR3: 000000002d42c000 CR4: 00000000003506f0\nDR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000\nDR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400\nCall Trace:\n \u0026lt;TASK\u0026gt;\n rt6_nh_find_match+0xfa/0x1a0 net/ipv6/route.c:784\n nexthop_for_each_fib6_nh+0x26d/0x4a0 net/ipv4/nexthop.c:1496\n __find_rr_leaf+0x6e7/0xe00 net/ipv6/route.c:825\n find_rr_leaf net/ipv6/route.c:853 [inline]\n rt6_select net/ipv6/route.c:897 [inline]\n fib6_table_lookup+0x57e/0xa30 net/ipv6/route.c:2195\n ip6_pol_route+0x1cd/0x1150 net/ipv6/route.c:2231\n pol_lookup_func include/net/ip6_fib.h:616 [inline]\n fib6_rule_lookup+0x386/0x720 net/ipv6/fib6_rules.c:121\n ip6_route_output_flags_noref net/ipv6/route.c:2639 [inline]\n ip6_route_output_flags+0x1d0/0x640 net/ipv6/route.c:2651\n ip6_dst_lookup_tail.constprop.0+0x961/0x1760 net/ipv6/ip6_output.c:1147\n ip6_dst_lookup_flow+0x99/0x1d0 net/ipv6/ip6_output.c:1250\n rawv6_sendmsg+0xdab/0x4340 net/ipv6/raw.c:898\n inet_sendmsg+0x119/0x140 net/ipv4/af_inet.c:853\n sock_sendmsg_nosec net/socket.c:730 [inline]\n __sock_sendmsg net/socket.c:745 [inline]\n sock_write_iter+0x4b8/0x5c0 net/socket.c:1160\n new_sync_write fs/read_write.c:497 [inline]\n vfs_write+0x6b6/0x1140 fs/read_write.c:590\n ksys_write+0x1f8/0x260 fs/read_write.c:643\n do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:52 [inline]\n do_syscall_64+0xcd/0x250 arch/x86/entry/common.c:83\n entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f(CVE-2024-40960)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nmips: bmips: BCM6358: make sure CBR is correctly set\r\n\r\nIt was discovered that some device have CBR address set to 0 causing\nkernel panic when arch_sync_dma_for_cpu_all is called.\r\n\r\nThis was notice in situation where the system is booted from TP1 and\nBMIPS_GET_CBR() returns 0 instead of a valid address and\n!!(read_c0_brcm_cmt_local() \u0026amp; (1 \u0026lt;\u0026lt; 31)); not failing.\r\n\r\nThe current check whether RAC flush should be disabled or not are not\nenough hence lets check if CBR is a valid address or not.(CVE-2024-40963)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nserial: imx: Introduce timeout when waiting on transmitter empty\r\n\r\nBy waiting at most 1 second for USR2_TXDC to be set, we avoid a potential\ndeadlock.\r\n\r\nIn case of the timeout, there is not much we can do, so we simply ignore\nthe transmitter state and optimistically try to continue.(CVE-2024-40967)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\next4: do not create EA inode under buffer lock\r\n\r\next4_xattr_set_entry() creates new EA inodes while holding buffer lock\non the external xattr block. This is problematic as it nests all the\nallocation locking (which acquires locks on other buffers) under the\nbuffer lock. This can even deadlock when the filesystem is corrupted and\ne.g. quota file is setup to contain xattr block as data block. Move the\nallocation of EA inode out of ext4_xattr_set_entry() into the callers.(CVE-2024-40972)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\ndrop_monitor: replace spin_lock by raw_spin_lock\r\n\r\ntrace_drop_common() is called with preemption disabled, and it acquires\na spin_lock. This is problematic for RT kernels because spin_locks are\nsleeping locks in this configuration, which causes the following splat:\r\n\r\nBUG: sleeping function called from invalid context at kernel/locking/spinlock_rt.c:48\nin_atomic(): 1, irqs_disabled(): 1, non_block: 0, pid: 449, name: rcuc/47\npreempt_count: 1, expected: 0\nRCU nest depth: 2, expected: 2\n5 locks held by rcuc/47/449:\n #0: ff1100086ec30a60 ((softirq_ctrl.lock)){+.+.}-{2:2}, at: __local_bh_disable_ip+0x105/0x210\n #1: ffffffffb394a280 (rcu_read_lock){....}-{1:2}, at: rt_spin_lock+0xbf/0x130\n #2: ffffffffb394a280 (rcu_read_lock){....}-{1:2}, at: __local_bh_disable_ip+0x11c/0x210\n #3: ffffffffb394a160 (rcu_callback){....}-{0:0}, at: rcu_do_batch+0x360/0xc70\n #4: ff1100086ee07520 (\u0026amp;data-\u0026gt;lock){+.+.}-{2:2}, at: trace_drop_common.constprop.0+0xb5/0x290\nirq event stamp: 139909\nhardirqs last enabled at (139908): [\u0026lt;ffffffffb1df2b33\u0026gt;] _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x63/0x80\nhardirqs last disabled at (139909): [\u0026lt;ffffffffb19bd03d\u0026gt;] trace_drop_common.constprop.0+0x26d/0x290\nsoftirqs last enabled at (139892): [\u0026lt;ffffffffb07a1083\u0026gt;] __local_bh_enable_ip+0x103/0x170\nsoftirqs last disabled at (139898): [\u0026lt;ffffffffb0909b33\u0026gt;] rcu_cpu_kthread+0x93/0x1f0\nPreemption disabled at:\n[\u0026lt;ffffffffb1de786b\u0026gt;] rt_mutex_slowunlock+0xab/0x2e0\nCPU: 47 PID: 449 Comm: rcuc/47 Not tainted 6.9.0-rc2-rt1+ #7\nHardware name: Dell Inc. PowerEdge R650/0Y2G81, BIOS 1.6.5 04/15/2022\nCall Trace:\n \u0026lt;TASK\u0026gt;\n dump_stack_lvl+0x8c/0xd0\n dump_stack+0x14/0x20\n __might_resched+0x21e/0x2f0\n rt_spin_lock+0x5e/0x130\n ? trace_drop_common.constprop.0+0xb5/0x290\n ? skb_queue_purge_reason.part.0+0x1bf/0x230\n trace_drop_common.constprop.0+0xb5/0x290\n ? preempt_count_sub+0x1c/0xd0\n ? _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x4a/0x80\n ? __pfx_trace_drop_common.constprop.0+0x10/0x10\n ? rt_mutex_slowunlock+0x26a/0x2e0\n ? skb_queue_purge_reason.part.0+0x1bf/0x230\n ? __pfx_rt_mutex_slowunlock+0x10/0x10\n ? skb_queue_purge_reason.part.0+0x1bf/0x230\n trace_kfree_skb_hit+0x15/0x20\n trace_kfree_skb+0xe9/0x150\n kfree_skb_reason+0x7b/0x110\n skb_queue_purge_reason.part.0+0x1bf/0x230\n ? __pfx_skb_queue_purge_reason.part.0+0x10/0x10\n ? mark_lock.part.0+0x8a/0x520\n...\r\n\r\ntrace_drop_common() also disables interrupts, but this is a minor issue\nbecause we could easily replace it with a local_lock.\r\n\r\nReplace the spin_lock with raw_spin_lock to avoid sleeping in atomic\ncontext.(CVE-2024-40980)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nbatman-adv: bypass empty buckets in batadv_purge_orig_ref()\r\n\r\nMany syzbot reports are pointing to soft lockups in\nbatadv_purge_orig_ref() [1]\r\n\r\nRoot cause is unknown, but we can avoid spending too much\ntime there and perhaps get more interesting reports.\r\n\r\n[1]\r\n\r\nwatchdog: BUG: soft lockup - CPU#0 stuck for 27s! [kworker/u4:6:621]\nModules linked in:\nirq event stamp: 6182794\n hardirqs last enabled at (6182793): [\u0026lt;ffff8000801dae10\u0026gt;] __local_bh_enable_ip+0x224/0x44c kernel/softirq.c:386\n hardirqs last disabled at (6182794): [\u0026lt;ffff80008ad66a78\u0026gt;] __el1_irq arch/arm64/kernel/entry-common.c:533 [inline]\n hardirqs last disabled at (6182794): [\u0026lt;ffff80008ad66a78\u0026gt;] el1_interrupt+0x24/0x68 arch/arm64/kernel/entry-common.c:551\n softirqs last enabled at (6182792): [\u0026lt;ffff80008aab71c4\u0026gt;] spin_unlock_bh include/linux/spinlock.h:396 [inline]\n softirqs last enabled at (6182792): [\u0026lt;ffff80008aab71c4\u0026gt;] batadv_purge_orig_ref+0x114c/0x1228 net/batman-adv/originator.c:1287\n softirqs last disabled at (6182790): [\u0026lt;ffff80008aab61dc\u0026gt;] spin_lock_bh include/linux/spinlock.h:356 [inline]\n softirqs last disabled at (6182790): [\u0026lt;ffff80008aab61dc\u0026gt;] batadv_purge_orig_ref+0x164/0x1228 net/batman-adv/originator.c:1271\nCPU: 0 PID: 621 Comm: kworker/u4:6 Not tainted 6.8.0-rc7-syzkaller-g707081b61156 #0\nHardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 02/29/2024\nWorkqueue: bat_events batadv_purge_orig\npstate: 80400005 (Nzcv daif +PAN -UAO -TCO -DIT -SSBS BTYPE=--)\n pc : should_resched arch/arm64/include/asm/preempt.h:79 [inline]\n pc : __local_bh_enable_ip+0x228/0x44c kernel/softirq.c:388\n lr : __local_bh_enable_ip+0x224/0x44c kernel/softirq.c:386\nsp : ffff800099007970\nx29: ffff800099007980 x28: 1fffe00018fce1bd x27: dfff800000000000\nx26: ffff0000d2620008 x25: ffff0000c7e70de8 x24: 0000000000000001\nx23: 1fffe00018e57781 x22: dfff800000000000 x21: ffff80008aab71c4\nx20: ffff0001b40136c0 x19: ffff0000c72bbc08 x18: 1fffe0001a817bb0\nx17: ffff800125414000 x16: ffff80008032116c x15: 0000000000000001\nx14: 1fffe0001ee9d610 x13: 0000000000000000 x12: 0000000000000003\nx11: 0000000000000000 x10: 0000000000ff0100 x9 : 0000000000000000\nx8 : 00000000005e5789 x7 : ffff80008aab61dc x6 : 0000000000000000\nx5 : 0000000000000000 x4 : 0000000000000001 x3 : 0000000000000000\nx2 : 0000000000000006 x1 : 0000000000000080 x0 : ffff800125414000\nCall trace:\n __daif_local_irq_enable arch/arm64/include/asm/irqflags.h:27 [inline]\n arch_local_irq_enable arch/arm64/include/asm/irqflags.h:49 [inline]\n __local_bh_enable_ip+0x228/0x44c kernel/softirq.c:386\n __raw_spin_unlock_bh include/linux/spinlock_api_smp.h:167 [inline]\n _raw_spin_unlock_bh+0x3c/0x4c kernel/locking/spinlock.c:210\n spin_unlock_bh include/linux/spinlock.h:396 [inline]\n batadv_purge_orig_ref+0x114c/0x1228 net/batman-adv/originator.c:1287\n batadv_purge_orig+0x20/0x70 net/batman-adv/originator.c:1300\n process_one_work+0x694/0x1204 kernel/workqueue.c:2633\n process_scheduled_works kernel/workqueue.c:2706 [inline]\n worker_thread+0x938/0xef4 kernel/workqueue.c:2787\n kthread+0x288/0x310 kernel/kthread.c:388\n ret_from_fork+0x10/0x20 arch/arm64/kernel/entry.S:860\nSending NMI from CPU 0 to CPUs 1:\nNMI backtrace for cpu 1\nCPU: 1 PID: 0 Comm: swapper/1 Not tainted 6.8.0-rc7-syzkaller-g707081b61156 #0\nHardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 02/29/2024\npstate: 80400005 (Nzcv daif +PAN -UAO -TCO -DIT -SSBS BTYPE=--)\n pc : arch_local_irq_enable+0x8/0xc arch/arm64/include/asm/irqflags.h:51\n lr : default_idle_call+0xf8/0x128 kernel/sched/idle.c:103\nsp : ffff800093a17d30\nx29: ffff800093a17d30 x28: dfff800000000000 x27: 1ffff00012742fb4\nx26: ffff80008ec9d000 x25: 0000000000000000 x24: 0000000000000002\nx23: 1ffff00011d93a74 x22: ffff80008ec9d3a0 x21: 0000000000000000\nx20: ffff0000c19dbc00 x19: ffff8000802d0fd8 x18: 1fffe00036804396\nx17: ffff80008ec9d000 x16: ffff8000802d089c x15: 0000000000000001\n---truncated---(CVE-2024-40981)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nssb: Fix potential NULL pointer dereference in ssb_device_uevent()\r\n\r\nThe ssb_device_uevent() function first attempts to convert the \u0026apos;dev\u0026apos; pointer\nto \u0026apos;struct ssb_device *\u0026apos;. However, it mistakenly dereferences \u0026apos;dev\u0026apos; before\nperforming the NULL check, potentially leading to a NULL pointer\ndereference if \u0026apos;dev\u0026apos; is NULL.\r\n\r\nTo fix this issue, move the NULL check before dereferencing the \u0026apos;dev\u0026apos; pointer,\nensuring that the pointer is valid before attempting to use it.\r\n\r\nFound by Linux Verification Center (linuxtesting.org) with SVACE.(CVE-2024-40982)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nnet/sched: act_api: fix possible infinite loop in tcf_idr_check_alloc()\r\n\r\nsyzbot found hanging tasks waiting on rtnl_lock [1]\r\n\r\nA reproducer is available in the syzbot bug.\r\n\r\nWhen a request to add multiple actions with the same index is sent, the\nsecond request will block forever on the first request. This holds\nrtnl_lock, and causes tasks to hang.\r\n\r\nReturn -EAGAIN to prevent infinite looping, while keeping documented\nbehavior.\r\n\r\n[1]\r\n\r\nINFO: task kworker/1:0:5088 blocked for more than 143 seconds.\nNot tainted 6.9.0-rc4-syzkaller-00173-g3cdb45594619 #0\n\u0026quot;echo 0 \u0026gt; /proc/sys/kernel/hung_task_timeout_secs\u0026quot; disables this message.\ntask:kworker/1:0 state:D stack:23744 pid:5088 tgid:5088 ppid:2 flags:0x00004000\nWorkqueue: events_power_efficient reg_check_chans_work\nCall Trace:\n\u0026lt;TASK\u0026gt;\ncontext_switch kernel/sched/core.c:5409 [inline]\n__schedule+0xf15/0x5d00 kernel/sched/core.c:6746\n__schedule_loop kernel/sched/core.c:6823 [inline]\nschedule+0xe7/0x350 kernel/sched/core.c:6838\nschedule_preempt_disabled+0x13/0x30 kernel/sched/core.c:6895\n__mutex_lock_common kernel/locking/mutex.c:684 [inline]\n__mutex_lock+0x5b8/0x9c0 kernel/locking/mutex.c:752\nwiphy_lock include/net/cfg80211.h:5953 [inline]\nreg_leave_invalid_chans net/wireless/reg.c:2466 [inline]\nreg_check_chans_work+0x10a/0x10e0 net/wireless/reg.c:2481(CVE-2024-40995)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\ndrm/amdkfd: don\u0026apos;t allow mapping the MMIO HDP page with large pages\r\n\r\nWe don\u0026apos;t get the right offset in that case. The GPU has\nan unused 4K area of the register BAR space into which you can\nremap registers. We remap the HDP flush registers into this\nspace to allow userspace (CPU or GPU) to flush the HDP when it\nupdates VRAM. However, on systems with \u0026gt;4K pages, we end up\nexposing PAGE_SIZE of MMIO space.(CVE-2024-41011)",
"id": "OESA-2024-1942",
"modified": "2026-08-06T11:07:24Z",
"published": "2024-08-02T11:07:24Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://www.openeuler.org/en/security/security-bulletins/detail?id=openEuler-SA-2024-1942"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2021-47205"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2022-48703"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2022-48859"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2023-52679"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2023-52764"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-26988"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-27012"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-27032"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-27038"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-27047"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-27052"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-27065"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-27412"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-27416"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-34777"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-35837"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-35931"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-36923"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-37078"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-38548"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-38567"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-38607"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-38611"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-39471"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-39475"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-39476"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-39484"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-39506"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-39508"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-40915"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-40945"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-40947"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-40956"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-40960"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-40963"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-40967"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-40972"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-40980"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-40981"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-40982"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-40995"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-41011"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.7.2",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
],
"summary": "kernel security update",
"upstream": [
"CVE-2021-47205",
"CVE-2022-48703",
"CVE-2022-48859",
"CVE-2023-52679",
"CVE-2023-52764",
"CVE-2024-26988",
"CVE-2024-27012",
"CVE-2024-27032",
"CVE-2024-27038",
"CVE-2024-27047",
"CVE-2024-27052",
"CVE-2024-27065",
"CVE-2024-27412",
"CVE-2024-27416",
"CVE-2024-34777",
"CVE-2024-35837",
"CVE-2024-35931",
"CVE-2024-36923",
"CVE-2024-37078",
"CVE-2024-38548",
"CVE-2024-38567",
"CVE-2024-38607",
"CVE-2024-38611",
"CVE-2024-39471",
"CVE-2024-39475",
"CVE-2024-39476",
"CVE-2024-39484",
"CVE-2024-39506",
"CVE-2024-39508",
"CVE-2024-40915",
"CVE-2024-40945",
"CVE-2024-40947",
"CVE-2024-40956",
"CVE-2024-40960",
"CVE-2024-40963",
"CVE-2024-40967",
"CVE-2024-40972",
"CVE-2024-40980",
"CVE-2024-40981",
"CVE-2024-40982",
"CVE-2024-40995",
"CVE-2024-41011"
]
}
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date | Other |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
The approach is described in our paper Mapping CVEs to MITRE ATT&CK Techniques: A Curated Gold-Set Classifier and the Limits of LLM-Assisted Label Expansion.
Browse all ATT&CK techniques and the vulnerabilities related to each.
Related by attack behaviour
Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.