CVE-2022-3857 (GCVE-0-2022-3857)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2023-03-06 00:00 – Updated: 2024-10-29 18:03
VLAI
EPSS
VEX
Maintainer contacted. This is a false-positive. The flaw does not actually exist and was erroneously tested.
Show details on NVD website{
"containers": {
"cna": {
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2024-10-29T18:03:32.799Z",
"orgId": "53f830b8-0a3f-465b-8143-3b8a9948e749",
"shortName": "redhat"
},
"rejectedReasons": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "Maintainer contacted. This is a false-positive. The flaw does not actually exist and was erroneously tested."
}
]
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "53f830b8-0a3f-465b-8143-3b8a9948e749",
"assignerShortName": "redhat",
"cveId": "CVE-2022-3857",
"datePublished": "2023-03-06T00:00:00.000Z",
"dateRejected": "2024-10-09T03:29:38.180Z",
"dateReserved": "2022-11-04T00:00:00.000Z",
"dateUpdated": "2024-10-29T18:03:32.799Z",
"state": "REJECTED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.1",
"vulnerability-lookup:meta": {
"microsoft_vex": {
"current_release_date": "2024-10-09T00:00:00.000Z",
"cve": "CVE-2022-3857",
"id": "msrc_CVE-2022-3857",
"initial_release_date": "2023-03-10T00:00:00.000Z",
"product_status:fixed": "8",
"product_status:known_affected": "8",
"product_status:known_not_affected": "1",
"source": "Microsoft CSAF VEX",
"status": "final",
"title": "Rejected reason: Maintainer contacted. This is a false-positive. The flaw does not actually exist and was erroneously tested.",
"url": "https://msrc.microsoft.com/csaf/vex/2023/msrc_cve-2022-3857.json",
"version": "3"
},
"nvd": {
"cve": {
"cveTags": [],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "Rejected reason: Maintainer contacted. This is a false-positive. The flaw does not actually exist and was erroneously tested."
}
],
"id": "CVE-2022-3857",
"lastModified": "2024-10-09T04:15:06.567",
"metrics": {},
"published": "2023-03-06T23:15:11.087",
"references": [],
"sourceIdentifier": "secalert@redhat.com",
"vulnStatus": "Rejected"
}
}
}
}
Loading…
Loading…
Experimental. This forecast is provided for visualization only and may change without notice. Do not use it for operational decisions.
Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date | Other |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Loading…
The MITRE ATT&CK techniques below are AI-generated suggestions, inferred from the description of the
vulnerability by the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-classification-roberta-base
model, served locally by ML-Gateway.
They have not been verified by an analyst and are provided for guidance only.
The approach is described in our paper Mapping CVEs to MITRE ATT&CK Techniques: A Curated Gold-Set Classifier and the Limits of LLM-Assisted Label Expansion.
Browse all ATT&CK techniques and the vulnerabilities related to each.
The approach is described in our paper Mapping CVEs to MITRE ATT&CK Techniques: A Curated Gold-Set Classifier and the Limits of LLM-Assisted Label Expansion.
Browse all ATT&CK techniques and the vulnerabilities related to each.
Loading…
Related by attack behaviour
Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.
Loading…