CVE-2021-27708 (GCVE-0-2021-27708)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2021-04-14 15:01 – Updated: 2024-08-03 21:26- n/a
| URL | Tags |
|---|---|
| https://hackmd.io/7FtB06f-SJ-SCfkMYcXYxA | x_refsource_MISC |
| https://hackmd.io/mDgIBvoxSPCZrZiZjfQGhw | x_refsource_MISC |
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2024-08-03T21:26:10.701Z",
"orgId": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"shortName": "CVE"
},
"references": [
{
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC",
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "https://hackmd.io/7FtB06f-SJ-SCfkMYcXYxA"
},
{
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC",
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "https://hackmd.io/mDgIBvoxSPCZrZiZjfQGhw"
}
],
"title": "CVE Program Container"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"product": "n/a",
"vendor": "n/a",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "n/a"
}
]
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "Command Injection in TOTOLINK X5000R router with firmware v9.1.0u.6118_B20201102, and TOTOLINK A720R router with firmware v4.1.5cu.470_B20200911 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary OS commands by sending a modified HTTP request. This occurs because the function executes glibc\u0027s system function with untrusted input. In the function, \"command\" parameter is directly passed to the attacker, allowing them to control the \"command\" field to attack the OS."
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"description": "n/a",
"lang": "en",
"type": "text"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2021-04-14T17:05:52.000Z",
"orgId": "8254265b-2729-46b6-b9e3-3dfca2d5bfca",
"shortName": "mitre"
},
"references": [
{
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC"
],
"url": "https://hackmd.io/7FtB06f-SJ-SCfkMYcXYxA"
},
{
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC"
],
"url": "https://hackmd.io/mDgIBvoxSPCZrZiZjfQGhw"
}
],
"x_legacyV4Record": {
"CVE_data_meta": {
"ASSIGNER": "cve@mitre.org",
"ID": "CVE-2021-27708",
"STATE": "PUBLIC"
},
"affects": {
"vendor": {
"vendor_data": [
{
"product": {
"product_data": [
{
"product_name": "n/a",
"version": {
"version_data": [
{
"version_value": "n/a"
}
]
}
}
]
},
"vendor_name": "n/a"
}
]
}
},
"data_format": "MITRE",
"data_type": "CVE",
"data_version": "4.0",
"description": {
"description_data": [
{
"lang": "eng",
"value": "Command Injection in TOTOLINK X5000R router with firmware v9.1.0u.6118_B20201102, and TOTOLINK A720R router with firmware v4.1.5cu.470_B20200911 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary OS commands by sending a modified HTTP request. This occurs because the function executes glibc\u0027s system function with untrusted input. In the function, \"command\" parameter is directly passed to the attacker, allowing them to control the \"command\" field to attack the OS."
}
]
},
"problemtype": {
"problemtype_data": [
{
"description": [
{
"lang": "eng",
"value": "n/a"
}
]
}
]
},
"references": {
"reference_data": [
{
"name": "https://hackmd.io/7FtB06f-SJ-SCfkMYcXYxA",
"refsource": "MISC",
"url": "https://hackmd.io/7FtB06f-SJ-SCfkMYcXYxA"
},
{
"name": "https://hackmd.io/mDgIBvoxSPCZrZiZjfQGhw",
"refsource": "MISC",
"url": "https://hackmd.io/mDgIBvoxSPCZrZiZjfQGhw"
}
]
}
}
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "8254265b-2729-46b6-b9e3-3dfca2d5bfca",
"assignerShortName": "mitre",
"cveId": "CVE-2021-27708",
"datePublished": "2021-04-14T15:01:49.000Z",
"dateReserved": "2021-02-25T00:00:00.000Z",
"dateUpdated": "2024-08-03T21:26:10.701Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.1",
"vulnerability-lookup:meta": {
"epss": {
"cve": "CVE-2021-27708",
"date": "2026-11-09",
"epss": "0.0761",
"percentile": "0.94593"
},
"nvd": {
"cve": {
"configurations": [
{
"nodes": [
{
"cpeMatch": [
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:totolink:x5000r_firmware:9.1.0u.6118_b20201102:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "AFCC3B52-0985-4F61-BBCC-16A271E15CD4",
"vulnerable": true
}
],
"negate": false,
"operator": "OR"
},
{
"cpeMatch": [
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:h:totolink:x5000r:-:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "BC45BFB0-0CF0-4F9E-B19D-D274B17F1591",
"vulnerable": false
}
],
"negate": false,
"operator": "OR"
}
],
"operator": "AND"
},
{
"nodes": [
{
"cpeMatch": [
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:totolink:a720r_firmware:4.1.5cu.470_b20200911:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "C7B3C9D3-E762-4AEE-9E03-B2A1819785A4",
"vulnerable": true
}
],
"negate": false,
"operator": "OR"
},
{
"cpeMatch": [
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:h:totolink:a720r:-:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "A1DE5168-B787-462C-B024-2B8F73759034",
"vulnerable": false
}
],
"negate": false,
"operator": "OR"
}
],
"operator": "AND"
}
],
"cveTags": [],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "Command Injection in TOTOLINK X5000R router with firmware v9.1.0u.6118_B20201102, and TOTOLINK A720R router with firmware v4.1.5cu.470_B20200911 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary OS commands by sending a modified HTTP request. This occurs because the function executes glibc\u0027s system function with untrusted input. In the function, \"command\" parameter is directly passed to the attacker, allowing them to control the \"command\" field to attack the OS."
},
{
"lang": "es",
"value": "Una inyecci\u00f3n de comandos en el enrutador TOTOLINK X5000R con firmware v9.1.0u.6118_B20201102, permite a atacantes remotos ejecutar comandos arbitrarios del Sistema Operativo mediante el env\u00edo de una petici\u00f3n HTTP modificada.\u0026#xa0;Esto ocurre porque la funci\u00f3n ejecuta la funci\u00f3n del sistema de glibc con una entrada que no es confiable.\u0026#xa0;En la funci\u00f3n, el par\u00e1metro \"command\" se pasa directamente al atacante, lo que le permite controlar el campo \"command\" para atacar el sistema operativo"
}
],
"id": "CVE-2021-27708",
"lastModified": "2024-11-21T05:58:27.993",
"metrics": {
"cvssMetricV2": [
{
"acInsufInfo": false,
"baseSeverity": "HIGH",
"cvssData": {
"accessComplexity": "LOW",
"accessVector": "NETWORK",
"authentication": "NONE",
"availabilityImpact": "COMPLETE",
"baseScore": 10.0,
"confidentialityImpact": "COMPLETE",
"integrityImpact": "COMPLETE",
"vectorString": "AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:C/I:C/A:C",
"version": "2.0"
},
"exploitabilityScore": 10.0,
"impactScore": 10.0,
"obtainAllPrivilege": false,
"obtainOtherPrivilege": false,
"obtainUserPrivilege": false,
"source": "nvd@nist.gov",
"type": "Primary",
"userInteractionRequired": false
}
],
"cvssMetricV31": [
{
"cvssData": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "HIGH",
"baseScore": 9.8,
"baseSeverity": "CRITICAL",
"confidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
"integrityImpact": "HIGH",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"version": "3.1"
},
"exploitabilityScore": 3.9,
"impactScore": 5.9,
"source": "nvd@nist.gov",
"type": "Primary"
}
]
},
"published": "2021-04-14T16:15:14.127",
"references": [
{
"source": "cve@mitre.org",
"tags": [
"Exploit",
"Third Party Advisory"
],
"url": "https://hackmd.io/7FtB06f-SJ-SCfkMYcXYxA"
},
{
"source": "cve@mitre.org",
"tags": [
"Exploit",
"Third Party Advisory"
],
"url": "https://hackmd.io/mDgIBvoxSPCZrZiZjfQGhw"
},
{
"source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"tags": [
"Exploit",
"Third Party Advisory"
],
"url": "https://hackmd.io/7FtB06f-SJ-SCfkMYcXYxA"
},
{
"source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"tags": [
"Exploit",
"Third Party Advisory"
],
"url": "https://hackmd.io/mDgIBvoxSPCZrZiZjfQGhw"
}
],
"sourceIdentifier": "cve@mitre.org",
"vulnStatus": "Modified",
"weaknesses": [
{
"description": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "CWE-78"
}
],
"source": "nvd@nist.gov",
"type": "Primary"
}
]
}
},
"redhat_vex": {
"current_release_date": "2026-03-27T14:23:58+00:00",
"cve": "CVE-2021-27708",
"id": "CVE-2021-27708",
"initial_release_date": "2021-01-01T00:00:00+00:00",
"product_status:known_not_affected": "1",
"source": "Red Hat CSAF VEX",
"status": "final",
"title": "CVE-2021-27708",
"url": "https://security.access.redhat.com/data/csaf/v2/vex/2021/cve-2021-27708.json",
"version": "3"
}
}
}
Drag nodes to arrange them. Double-click a related vulnerability to open it, or a source to visit its link. The Physics button on the left tunes the layout and the simulation; the legend at the bottom left hides or shows nodes by kind and by sighting type.
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date | Other |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Vulnerability timeline
Sightings and recorded dates, grouped by day · UTC
How durations are calculated
Following the VTEM framework (Black Hat USA 2015), time to patch starts when the vendor or a coordinator was informed, total time to patch at discovery, and disclosure to patch at public disclosure; vendor response time runs from the report to its acknowledgement. Time to exploit and time unpatched start at the earliest discovery or report, falling back to public disclosure. Unpatched time ends at the first recorded patch, or the calculation time when no patch is recorded. Exploitation to patch shows the interval between those two events; a published proof of concept is a public exploit, not exploitation.
Each result shows its source dates. A negative interval means the end event came first; when date-only inputs leave the order open, the result says so. Date-only inputs are approximate. The earliest evidence wins: KEV report dates and sightings are labelled as such. Records describing another vulnerability are listed but never calculated from, and a PoC alone does not establish exploitation. Missing patch evidence does not prove that no patch exists. Filters below change the event list only.
Loading timeline…
The approach is described in our paper Mapping CVEs to MITRE ATT&CK Techniques: A Curated Gold-Set Classifier and the Limits of LLM-Assisted Label Expansion.
Browse all ATT&CK techniques and the vulnerabilities related to each.
Related by attack behaviour
Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.