CVE-2017-18924 (GCVE-0-2017-18924)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2020-10-04 04:38 – Updated: 2024-08-05 21:45 Disputed
VLAI?
Summary
oauth2-server (aka node-oauth2-server) through 3.1.1 implements OAuth 2.0 without PKCE. It does not prevent authorization code injection. This is similar to CVE-2020-7692. NOTE: the vendor states 'As RFC7636 is an extension, I think the claim in the Readme of "RFC 6749 compliant" is valid and not misleading and I also therefore wouldn't describe this as a "vulnerability" with the library per se.
Severity ?
No CVSS data available.
CWE
- n/a
Assigner
References
| URL | Tags | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|||||||||||||||||
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2024-08-05T21:45:24.546Z",
"orgId": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"shortName": "CVE"
},
"references": [
{
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC",
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc7636"
},
{
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC",
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-oauth-security-topics-15"
},
{
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC",
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "https://codeburst.io/missing-the-point-in-securing-oauth-2-0-83968708b467"
},
{
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC",
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "https://github.com/oauthjs/node-oauth2-server/issues/637"
},
{
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC",
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "https://github.com/oauthjs/node-oauth2-server/pull/452"
}
],
"title": "CVE Program Container"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"product": "n/a",
"vendor": "n/a",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "n/a"
}
]
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "oauth2-server (aka node-oauth2-server) through 3.1.1 implements OAuth 2.0 without PKCE. It does not prevent authorization code injection. This is similar to CVE-2020-7692. NOTE: the vendor states \u0027As RFC7636 is an extension, I think the claim in the Readme of \"RFC 6749 compliant\" is valid and not misleading and I also therefore wouldn\u0027t describe this as a \"vulnerability\" with the library per se."
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"description": "n/a",
"lang": "en",
"type": "text"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2020-10-04T04:38:47",
"orgId": "8254265b-2729-46b6-b9e3-3dfca2d5bfca",
"shortName": "mitre"
},
"references": [
{
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC"
],
"url": "https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc7636"
},
{
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC"
],
"url": "https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-oauth-security-topics-15"
},
{
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC"
],
"url": "https://codeburst.io/missing-the-point-in-securing-oauth-2-0-83968708b467"
},
{
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC"
],
"url": "https://github.com/oauthjs/node-oauth2-server/issues/637"
},
{
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC"
],
"url": "https://github.com/oauthjs/node-oauth2-server/pull/452"
}
],
"tags": [
"disputed"
],
"x_legacyV4Record": {
"CVE_data_meta": {
"ASSIGNER": "cve@mitre.org",
"ID": "CVE-2017-18924",
"STATE": "PUBLIC"
},
"affects": {
"vendor": {
"vendor_data": [
{
"product": {
"product_data": [
{
"product_name": "n/a",
"version": {
"version_data": [
{
"version_value": "n/a"
}
]
}
}
]
},
"vendor_name": "n/a"
}
]
}
},
"data_format": "MITRE",
"data_type": "CVE",
"data_version": "4.0",
"description": {
"description_data": [
{
"lang": "eng",
"value": "** DISPUTED ** oauth2-server (aka node-oauth2-server) through 3.1.1 implements OAuth 2.0 without PKCE. It does not prevent authorization code injection. This is similar to CVE-2020-7692. NOTE: the vendor states \u0027As RFC7636 is an extension, I think the claim in the Readme of \"RFC 6749 compliant\" is valid and not misleading and I also therefore wouldn\u0027t describe this as a \"vulnerability\" with the library per se.\u0027"
}
]
},
"problemtype": {
"problemtype_data": [
{
"description": [
{
"lang": "eng",
"value": "n/a"
}
]
}
]
},
"references": {
"reference_data": [
{
"name": "https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc7636",
"refsource": "MISC",
"url": "https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc7636"
},
{
"name": "https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-oauth-security-topics-15",
"refsource": "MISC",
"url": "https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-oauth-security-topics-15"
},
{
"name": "https://codeburst.io/missing-the-point-in-securing-oauth-2-0-83968708b467",
"refsource": "MISC",
"url": "https://codeburst.io/missing-the-point-in-securing-oauth-2-0-83968708b467"
},
{
"name": "https://github.com/oauthjs/node-oauth2-server/issues/637",
"refsource": "MISC",
"url": "https://github.com/oauthjs/node-oauth2-server/issues/637"
},
{
"name": "https://github.com/oauthjs/node-oauth2-server/pull/452",
"refsource": "MISC",
"url": "https://github.com/oauthjs/node-oauth2-server/pull/452"
}
]
}
}
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "8254265b-2729-46b6-b9e3-3dfca2d5bfca",
"assignerShortName": "mitre",
"cveId": "CVE-2017-18924",
"datePublished": "2020-10-04T04:38:47",
"dateReserved": "2020-10-04T00:00:00",
"dateUpdated": "2024-08-05T21:45:24.546Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.1",
"vulnerability-lookup:meta": {
"nvd": "{\"cve\":{\"id\":\"CVE-2017-18924\",\"sourceIdentifier\":\"cve@mitre.org\",\"published\":\"2020-10-04T05:15:12.140\",\"lastModified\":\"2024-11-21T03:21:16.447\",\"vulnStatus\":\"Modified\",\"cveTags\":[{\"sourceIdentifier\":\"cve@mitre.org\",\"tags\":[\"disputed\"]}],\"descriptions\":[{\"lang\":\"en\",\"value\":\"oauth2-server (aka node-oauth2-server) through 3.1.1 implements OAuth 2.0 without PKCE. It does not prevent authorization code injection. This is similar to CVE-2020-7692. NOTE: the vendor states \u0027As RFC7636 is an extension, I think the claim in the Readme of \\\"RFC 6749 compliant\\\" is valid and not misleading and I also therefore wouldn\u0027t describe this as a \\\"vulnerability\\\" with the library per se.\"},{\"lang\":\"es\",\"value\":\"** EN DISPUTA ** oauth2-server (tambi\u00e9n se conoce como node-oauth2-server) versiones hasta 3.1.1, implementa OAuth versi\u00f3n 2.0 sin PKCE.\u0026#xa0;No impide la inyecci\u00f3n de c\u00f3digo de autorizaci\u00f3n.\u0026#xa0;Esto es similar a CVE-2020-7692.\u0026#xa0;NOTA: el proveedor declara \\\"Como RFC7636 es una extensi\u00f3n, considero que la afirmaci\u00f3n en el archivo L\u00e9ame de \\\"compatible con RFC 6749\\\" es v\u00e1lida y no enga\u00f1osa y, por lo tanto, tampoco describir\u00eda esto como una \\\"vulnerabilidad\\\" con la biblioteca en s\u00ed\"}],\"metrics\":{\"cvssMetricV31\":[{\"source\":\"nvd@nist.gov\",\"type\":\"Primary\",\"cvssData\":{\"version\":\"3.1\",\"vectorString\":\"CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N\",\"baseScore\":7.5,\"baseSeverity\":\"HIGH\",\"attackVector\":\"NETWORK\",\"attackComplexity\":\"LOW\",\"privilegesRequired\":\"NONE\",\"userInteraction\":\"NONE\",\"scope\":\"UNCHANGED\",\"confidentialityImpact\":\"HIGH\",\"integrityImpact\":\"NONE\",\"availabilityImpact\":\"NONE\"},\"exploitabilityScore\":3.9,\"impactScore\":3.6}],\"cvssMetricV2\":[{\"source\":\"nvd@nist.gov\",\"type\":\"Primary\",\"cvssData\":{\"version\":\"2.0\",\"vectorString\":\"AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N\",\"baseScore\":5.0,\"accessVector\":\"NETWORK\",\"accessComplexity\":\"LOW\",\"authentication\":\"NONE\",\"confidentialityImpact\":\"PARTIAL\",\"integrityImpact\":\"NONE\",\"availabilityImpact\":\"NONE\"},\"baseSeverity\":\"MEDIUM\",\"exploitabilityScore\":10.0,\"impactScore\":2.9,\"acInsufInfo\":false,\"obtainAllPrivilege\":false,\"obtainUserPrivilege\":false,\"obtainOtherPrivilege\":false,\"userInteractionRequired\":false}]},\"weaknesses\":[{\"source\":\"nvd@nist.gov\",\"type\":\"Primary\",\"description\":[{\"lang\":\"en\",\"value\":\"CWE-94\"}]}],\"configurations\":[{\"nodes\":[{\"operator\":\"OR\",\"negate\":false,\"cpeMatch\":[{\"vulnerable\":true,\"criteria\":\"cpe:2.3:a:oauth2-server_project:oauth2-server:*:*:*:*:*:node.js:*:*\",\"versionEndIncluding\":\"3.1.1\",\"matchCriteriaId\":\"7FFE5BBB-4620-482D-A32F-D416AA7E4ADA\"}]}]}],\"references\":[{\"url\":\"https://codeburst.io/missing-the-point-in-securing-oauth-2-0-83968708b467\",\"source\":\"cve@mitre.org\",\"tags\":[\"Third Party Advisory\"]},{\"url\":\"https://github.com/oauthjs/node-oauth2-server/issues/637\",\"source\":\"cve@mitre.org\",\"tags\":[\"Exploit\",\"Third Party Advisory\"]},{\"url\":\"https://github.com/oauthjs/node-oauth2-server/pull/452\",\"source\":\"cve@mitre.org\",\"tags\":[\"Patch\",\"Third Party Advisory\"]},{\"url\":\"https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-oauth-security-topics-15\",\"source\":\"cve@mitre.org\",\"tags\":[\"Exploit\",\"Third Party Advisory\"]},{\"url\":\"https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc7636\",\"source\":\"cve@mitre.org\",\"tags\":[\"Third Party Advisory\"]},{\"url\":\"https://codeburst.io/missing-the-point-in-securing-oauth-2-0-83968708b467\",\"source\":\"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\",\"tags\":[\"Third Party Advisory\"]},{\"url\":\"https://github.com/oauthjs/node-oauth2-server/issues/637\",\"source\":\"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\",\"tags\":[\"Exploit\",\"Third Party Advisory\"]},{\"url\":\"https://github.com/oauthjs/node-oauth2-server/pull/452\",\"source\":\"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\",\"tags\":[\"Patch\",\"Third Party Advisory\"]},{\"url\":\"https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-oauth-security-topics-15\",\"source\":\"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\",\"tags\":[\"Exploit\",\"Third Party Advisory\"]},{\"url\":\"https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc7636\",\"source\":\"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\",\"tags\":[\"Third Party Advisory\"]}]}}"
}
}
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…