CVE-2017-18924 (GCVE-0-2017-18924)

Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2020-10-04 04:38 – Updated: 2024-08-05 21:45 Disputed
VLAI?
Summary
oauth2-server (aka node-oauth2-server) through 3.1.1 implements OAuth 2.0 without PKCE. It does not prevent authorization code injection. This is similar to CVE-2020-7692. NOTE: the vendor states 'As RFC7636 is an extension, I think the claim in the Readme of "RFC 6749 compliant" is valid and not misleading and I also therefore wouldn't describe this as a "vulnerability" with the library per se.
Severity ?
No CVSS data available.
CWE
  • n/a
Assigner
Show details on NVD website

{
  "containers": {
    "adp": [
      {
        "providerMetadata": {
          "dateUpdated": "2024-08-05T21:45:24.546Z",
          "orgId": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
          "shortName": "CVE"
        },
        "references": [
          {
            "tags": [
              "x_refsource_MISC",
              "x_transferred"
            ],
            "url": "https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc7636"
          },
          {
            "tags": [
              "x_refsource_MISC",
              "x_transferred"
            ],
            "url": "https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-oauth-security-topics-15"
          },
          {
            "tags": [
              "x_refsource_MISC",
              "x_transferred"
            ],
            "url": "https://codeburst.io/missing-the-point-in-securing-oauth-2-0-83968708b467"
          },
          {
            "tags": [
              "x_refsource_MISC",
              "x_transferred"
            ],
            "url": "https://github.com/oauthjs/node-oauth2-server/issues/637"
          },
          {
            "tags": [
              "x_refsource_MISC",
              "x_transferred"
            ],
            "url": "https://github.com/oauthjs/node-oauth2-server/pull/452"
          }
        ],
        "title": "CVE Program Container"
      }
    ],
    "cna": {
      "affected": [
        {
          "product": "n/a",
          "vendor": "n/a",
          "versions": [
            {
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "n/a"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "descriptions": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "value": "oauth2-server (aka node-oauth2-server) through 3.1.1 implements OAuth 2.0 without PKCE. It does not prevent authorization code injection. This is similar to CVE-2020-7692. NOTE: the vendor states \u0027As RFC7636 is an extension, I think the claim in the Readme of \"RFC 6749 compliant\" is valid and not misleading and I also therefore wouldn\u0027t describe this as a \"vulnerability\" with the library per se."
        }
      ],
      "problemTypes": [
        {
          "descriptions": [
            {
              "description": "n/a",
              "lang": "en",
              "type": "text"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "providerMetadata": {
        "dateUpdated": "2020-10-04T04:38:47",
        "orgId": "8254265b-2729-46b6-b9e3-3dfca2d5bfca",
        "shortName": "mitre"
      },
      "references": [
        {
          "tags": [
            "x_refsource_MISC"
          ],
          "url": "https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc7636"
        },
        {
          "tags": [
            "x_refsource_MISC"
          ],
          "url": "https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-oauth-security-topics-15"
        },
        {
          "tags": [
            "x_refsource_MISC"
          ],
          "url": "https://codeburst.io/missing-the-point-in-securing-oauth-2-0-83968708b467"
        },
        {
          "tags": [
            "x_refsource_MISC"
          ],
          "url": "https://github.com/oauthjs/node-oauth2-server/issues/637"
        },
        {
          "tags": [
            "x_refsource_MISC"
          ],
          "url": "https://github.com/oauthjs/node-oauth2-server/pull/452"
        }
      ],
      "tags": [
        "disputed"
      ],
      "x_legacyV4Record": {
        "CVE_data_meta": {
          "ASSIGNER": "cve@mitre.org",
          "ID": "CVE-2017-18924",
          "STATE": "PUBLIC"
        },
        "affects": {
          "vendor": {
            "vendor_data": [
              {
                "product": {
                  "product_data": [
                    {
                      "product_name": "n/a",
                      "version": {
                        "version_data": [
                          {
                            "version_value": "n/a"
                          }
                        ]
                      }
                    }
                  ]
                },
                "vendor_name": "n/a"
              }
            ]
          }
        },
        "data_format": "MITRE",
        "data_type": "CVE",
        "data_version": "4.0",
        "description": {
          "description_data": [
            {
              "lang": "eng",
              "value": "** DISPUTED ** oauth2-server (aka node-oauth2-server) through 3.1.1 implements OAuth 2.0 without PKCE. It does not prevent authorization code injection. This is similar to CVE-2020-7692. NOTE: the vendor states \u0027As RFC7636 is an extension, I think the claim in the Readme of \"RFC 6749 compliant\" is valid and not misleading and I also therefore wouldn\u0027t describe this as a \"vulnerability\" with the library per se.\u0027"
            }
          ]
        },
        "problemtype": {
          "problemtype_data": [
            {
              "description": [
                {
                  "lang": "eng",
                  "value": "n/a"
                }
              ]
            }
          ]
        },
        "references": {
          "reference_data": [
            {
              "name": "https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc7636",
              "refsource": "MISC",
              "url": "https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc7636"
            },
            {
              "name": "https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-oauth-security-topics-15",
              "refsource": "MISC",
              "url": "https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-oauth-security-topics-15"
            },
            {
              "name": "https://codeburst.io/missing-the-point-in-securing-oauth-2-0-83968708b467",
              "refsource": "MISC",
              "url": "https://codeburst.io/missing-the-point-in-securing-oauth-2-0-83968708b467"
            },
            {
              "name": "https://github.com/oauthjs/node-oauth2-server/issues/637",
              "refsource": "MISC",
              "url": "https://github.com/oauthjs/node-oauth2-server/issues/637"
            },
            {
              "name": "https://github.com/oauthjs/node-oauth2-server/pull/452",
              "refsource": "MISC",
              "url": "https://github.com/oauthjs/node-oauth2-server/pull/452"
            }
          ]
        }
      }
    }
  },
  "cveMetadata": {
    "assignerOrgId": "8254265b-2729-46b6-b9e3-3dfca2d5bfca",
    "assignerShortName": "mitre",
    "cveId": "CVE-2017-18924",
    "datePublished": "2020-10-04T04:38:47",
    "dateReserved": "2020-10-04T00:00:00",
    "dateUpdated": "2024-08-05T21:45:24.546Z",
    "state": "PUBLISHED"
  },
  "dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
  "dataVersion": "5.1",
  "vulnerability-lookup:meta": {
    "nvd": "{\"cve\":{\"id\":\"CVE-2017-18924\",\"sourceIdentifier\":\"cve@mitre.org\",\"published\":\"2020-10-04T05:15:12.140\",\"lastModified\":\"2024-11-21T03:21:16.447\",\"vulnStatus\":\"Modified\",\"cveTags\":[{\"sourceIdentifier\":\"cve@mitre.org\",\"tags\":[\"disputed\"]}],\"descriptions\":[{\"lang\":\"en\",\"value\":\"oauth2-server (aka node-oauth2-server) through 3.1.1 implements OAuth 2.0 without PKCE. It does not prevent authorization code injection. This is similar to CVE-2020-7692. NOTE: the vendor states \u0027As RFC7636 is an extension, I think the claim in the Readme of \\\"RFC 6749 compliant\\\" is valid and not misleading and I also therefore wouldn\u0027t describe this as a \\\"vulnerability\\\" with the library per se.\"},{\"lang\":\"es\",\"value\":\"** EN DISPUTA ** oauth2-server (tambi\u00e9n se conoce como node-oauth2-server) versiones hasta 3.1.1, implementa OAuth versi\u00f3n 2.0 sin PKCE.\u0026#xa0;No impide la inyecci\u00f3n de c\u00f3digo de autorizaci\u00f3n.\u0026#xa0;Esto es similar a CVE-2020-7692.\u0026#xa0;NOTA: el proveedor declara \\\"Como RFC7636 es una extensi\u00f3n, considero que la afirmaci\u00f3n en el archivo L\u00e9ame de \\\"compatible con RFC 6749\\\" es v\u00e1lida y no enga\u00f1osa y, por lo tanto, tampoco describir\u00eda esto como una \\\"vulnerabilidad\\\" con la biblioteca en s\u00ed\"}],\"metrics\":{\"cvssMetricV31\":[{\"source\":\"nvd@nist.gov\",\"type\":\"Primary\",\"cvssData\":{\"version\":\"3.1\",\"vectorString\":\"CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N\",\"baseScore\":7.5,\"baseSeverity\":\"HIGH\",\"attackVector\":\"NETWORK\",\"attackComplexity\":\"LOW\",\"privilegesRequired\":\"NONE\",\"userInteraction\":\"NONE\",\"scope\":\"UNCHANGED\",\"confidentialityImpact\":\"HIGH\",\"integrityImpact\":\"NONE\",\"availabilityImpact\":\"NONE\"},\"exploitabilityScore\":3.9,\"impactScore\":3.6}],\"cvssMetricV2\":[{\"source\":\"nvd@nist.gov\",\"type\":\"Primary\",\"cvssData\":{\"version\":\"2.0\",\"vectorString\":\"AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N\",\"baseScore\":5.0,\"accessVector\":\"NETWORK\",\"accessComplexity\":\"LOW\",\"authentication\":\"NONE\",\"confidentialityImpact\":\"PARTIAL\",\"integrityImpact\":\"NONE\",\"availabilityImpact\":\"NONE\"},\"baseSeverity\":\"MEDIUM\",\"exploitabilityScore\":10.0,\"impactScore\":2.9,\"acInsufInfo\":false,\"obtainAllPrivilege\":false,\"obtainUserPrivilege\":false,\"obtainOtherPrivilege\":false,\"userInteractionRequired\":false}]},\"weaknesses\":[{\"source\":\"nvd@nist.gov\",\"type\":\"Primary\",\"description\":[{\"lang\":\"en\",\"value\":\"CWE-94\"}]}],\"configurations\":[{\"nodes\":[{\"operator\":\"OR\",\"negate\":false,\"cpeMatch\":[{\"vulnerable\":true,\"criteria\":\"cpe:2.3:a:oauth2-server_project:oauth2-server:*:*:*:*:*:node.js:*:*\",\"versionEndIncluding\":\"3.1.1\",\"matchCriteriaId\":\"7FFE5BBB-4620-482D-A32F-D416AA7E4ADA\"}]}]}],\"references\":[{\"url\":\"https://codeburst.io/missing-the-point-in-securing-oauth-2-0-83968708b467\",\"source\":\"cve@mitre.org\",\"tags\":[\"Third Party Advisory\"]},{\"url\":\"https://github.com/oauthjs/node-oauth2-server/issues/637\",\"source\":\"cve@mitre.org\",\"tags\":[\"Exploit\",\"Third Party Advisory\"]},{\"url\":\"https://github.com/oauthjs/node-oauth2-server/pull/452\",\"source\":\"cve@mitre.org\",\"tags\":[\"Patch\",\"Third Party Advisory\"]},{\"url\":\"https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-oauth-security-topics-15\",\"source\":\"cve@mitre.org\",\"tags\":[\"Exploit\",\"Third Party Advisory\"]},{\"url\":\"https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc7636\",\"source\":\"cve@mitre.org\",\"tags\":[\"Third Party Advisory\"]},{\"url\":\"https://codeburst.io/missing-the-point-in-securing-oauth-2-0-83968708b467\",\"source\":\"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\",\"tags\":[\"Third Party Advisory\"]},{\"url\":\"https://github.com/oauthjs/node-oauth2-server/issues/637\",\"source\":\"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\",\"tags\":[\"Exploit\",\"Third Party Advisory\"]},{\"url\":\"https://github.com/oauthjs/node-oauth2-server/pull/452\",\"source\":\"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\",\"tags\":[\"Patch\",\"Third Party Advisory\"]},{\"url\":\"https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-oauth-security-topics-15\",\"source\":\"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\",\"tags\":[\"Exploit\",\"Third Party Advisory\"]},{\"url\":\"https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc7636\",\"source\":\"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\",\"tags\":[\"Third Party Advisory\"]}]}}"
  }
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.


Loading…

Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.

Loading…

Loading…