CVE-2017-17847 (GCVE-0-2017-17847)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2017-12-22 23:00 – Updated: 2024-08-05 21:06
VLAI
EPSS
VEX
Summary
An issue was discovered in Enigmail before 1.9.9. Signature spoofing is possible because the UI does not properly distinguish between an attachment signature, and a signature that applies to the entire containing message, aka TBE-01-021. This is demonstrated by an e-mail message with an attachment that is a signed e-mail message in message/rfc822 format.
Severity
7.5 (High)
CWE
- n/a
Assigner
References
6 references
| URL | Tags |
|---|---|
| https://enigmail.net/download/other/Enigmail%20Pe… | x_refsource_MISC |
| https://sourceforge.net/p/enigmail/bugs/709/ | x_refsource_MISC |
| https://lists.debian.org/debian-security-announce… | x_refsource_MISC |
| https://www.mail-archive.com/enigmail-users%40eni… | x_refsource_MISC |
| https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2017… | mailing-listx_refsource_MLIST |
| https://www.debian.org/security/2017/dsa-4070 | vendor-advisoryx_refsource_DEBIAN |
Date Public
2017-12-22 00:00
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2024-08-05T21:06:49.077Z",
"orgId": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"shortName": "CVE"
},
"references": [
{
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC",
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "https://enigmail.net/download/other/Enigmail%20Pentest%20Report%20by%20Cure53%20-%20Excerpt.pdf"
},
{
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC",
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "https://sourceforge.net/p/enigmail/bugs/709/"
},
{
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC",
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "https://lists.debian.org/debian-security-announce/2017/msg00333.html"
},
{
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC",
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "https://www.mail-archive.com/enigmail-users%40enigmail.net/msg04280.html"
},
{
"name": "[debian-lts-announce] 20171223 [SECURITY] [DLA 1219-1] enigmail security update",
"tags": [
"mailing-list",
"x_refsource_MLIST",
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2017/12/msg00021.html"
},
{
"name": "DSA-4070",
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory",
"x_refsource_DEBIAN",
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "https://www.debian.org/security/2017/dsa-4070"
}
],
"title": "CVE Program Container"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"product": "n/a",
"vendor": "n/a",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "n/a"
}
]
}
],
"datePublic": "2017-12-22T00:00:00.000Z",
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "An issue was discovered in Enigmail before 1.9.9. Signature spoofing is possible because the UI does not properly distinguish between an attachment signature, and a signature that applies to the entire containing message, aka TBE-01-021. This is demonstrated by an e-mail message with an attachment that is a signed e-mail message in message/rfc822 format."
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"description": "n/a",
"lang": "en",
"type": "text"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2018-02-02T10:57:01.000Z",
"orgId": "8254265b-2729-46b6-b9e3-3dfca2d5bfca",
"shortName": "mitre"
},
"references": [
{
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC"
],
"url": "https://enigmail.net/download/other/Enigmail%20Pentest%20Report%20by%20Cure53%20-%20Excerpt.pdf"
},
{
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC"
],
"url": "https://sourceforge.net/p/enigmail/bugs/709/"
},
{
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC"
],
"url": "https://lists.debian.org/debian-security-announce/2017/msg00333.html"
},
{
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC"
],
"url": "https://www.mail-archive.com/enigmail-users%40enigmail.net/msg04280.html"
},
{
"name": "[debian-lts-announce] 20171223 [SECURITY] [DLA 1219-1] enigmail security update",
"tags": [
"mailing-list",
"x_refsource_MLIST"
],
"url": "https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2017/12/msg00021.html"
},
{
"name": "DSA-4070",
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory",
"x_refsource_DEBIAN"
],
"url": "https://www.debian.org/security/2017/dsa-4070"
}
],
"x_legacyV4Record": {
"CVE_data_meta": {
"ASSIGNER": "cve@mitre.org",
"ID": "CVE-2017-17847",
"STATE": "PUBLIC"
},
"affects": {
"vendor": {
"vendor_data": [
{
"product": {
"product_data": [
{
"product_name": "n/a",
"version": {
"version_data": [
{
"version_value": "n/a"
}
]
}
}
]
},
"vendor_name": "n/a"
}
]
}
},
"data_format": "MITRE",
"data_type": "CVE",
"data_version": "4.0",
"description": {
"description_data": [
{
"lang": "eng",
"value": "An issue was discovered in Enigmail before 1.9.9. Signature spoofing is possible because the UI does not properly distinguish between an attachment signature, and a signature that applies to the entire containing message, aka TBE-01-021. This is demonstrated by an e-mail message with an attachment that is a signed e-mail message in message/rfc822 format."
}
]
},
"problemtype": {
"problemtype_data": [
{
"description": [
{
"lang": "eng",
"value": "n/a"
}
]
}
]
},
"references": {
"reference_data": [
{
"name": "https://enigmail.net/download/other/Enigmail%20Pentest%20Report%20by%20Cure53%20-%20Excerpt.pdf",
"refsource": "MISC",
"url": "https://enigmail.net/download/other/Enigmail%20Pentest%20Report%20by%20Cure53%20-%20Excerpt.pdf"
},
{
"name": "https://sourceforge.net/p/enigmail/bugs/709/",
"refsource": "MISC",
"url": "https://sourceforge.net/p/enigmail/bugs/709/"
},
{
"name": "https://lists.debian.org/debian-security-announce/2017/msg00333.html",
"refsource": "MISC",
"url": "https://lists.debian.org/debian-security-announce/2017/msg00333.html"
},
{
"name": "https://www.mail-archive.com/enigmail-users@enigmail.net/msg04280.html",
"refsource": "MISC",
"url": "https://www.mail-archive.com/enigmail-users@enigmail.net/msg04280.html"
},
{
"name": "[debian-lts-announce] 20171223 [SECURITY] [DLA 1219-1] enigmail security update",
"refsource": "MLIST",
"url": "https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2017/12/msg00021.html"
},
{
"name": "DSA-4070",
"refsource": "DEBIAN",
"url": "https://www.debian.org/security/2017/dsa-4070"
}
]
}
}
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "8254265b-2729-46b6-b9e3-3dfca2d5bfca",
"assignerShortName": "mitre",
"cveId": "CVE-2017-17847",
"datePublished": "2017-12-22T23:00:00.000Z",
"dateReserved": "2017-12-22T00:00:00.000Z",
"dateUpdated": "2024-08-05T21:06:49.077Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.1",
"vulnerability-lookup:meta": {
"epss": {
"cve": "CVE-2017-17847",
"date": "2026-10-14",
"epss": "0.01196",
"percentile": "0.6749"
},
"nvd": {
"cve": {
"configurations": [
{
"nodes": [
{
"cpeMatch": [
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:a:enigmail:enigmail:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "FB028A65-2C8A-4D9C-88F8-78BAE49E77C4",
"versionEndExcluding": "1.9.9",
"vulnerable": true
}
],
"negate": false,
"operator": "OR"
}
]
},
{
"nodes": [
{
"cpeMatch": [
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:debian:debian_linux:8.0:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "C11E6FB0-C8C0-4527-9AA0-CB9B316F8F43",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:debian:debian_linux:9.0:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "DEECE5FC-CACF-4496-A3E7-164736409252",
"vulnerable": true
}
],
"negate": false,
"operator": "OR"
}
]
}
],
"cveTags": [],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "An issue was discovered in Enigmail before 1.9.9. Signature spoofing is possible because the UI does not properly distinguish between an attachment signature, and a signature that applies to the entire containing message, aka TBE-01-021. This is demonstrated by an e-mail message with an attachment that is a signed e-mail message in message/rfc822 format."
},
{
"lang": "es",
"value": "Se ha descubierto un problema en versiones anteriores a la 1.9.9 de Enigmail. Se puede dar una suplantaci\u00f3n de firma debido a que la interfaz de usuario no distingue correctamente entre una firma adjunta y una firma que aplica a todo el mensaje. Esto tambi\u00e9n se conoce como TBE-01-021. Esto se demuestra con un mensaje de correo electr\u00f3nico con un adjunto que es un mensaje de correo firmado en formato message/rfc822."
}
],
"id": "CVE-2017-17847",
"lastModified": "2026-05-13T00:24:29.033",
"metrics": {
"cvssMetricV2": [
{
"acInsufInfo": false,
"baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
"cvssData": {
"accessComplexity": "LOW",
"accessVector": "NETWORK",
"authentication": "NONE",
"availabilityImpact": "NONE",
"baseScore": 5.0,
"confidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"integrityImpact": "PARTIAL",
"vectorString": "AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:N",
"version": "2.0"
},
"exploitabilityScore": 10.0,
"impactScore": 2.9,
"obtainAllPrivilege": false,
"obtainOtherPrivilege": false,
"obtainUserPrivilege": false,
"source": "nvd@nist.gov",
"type": "Primary",
"userInteractionRequired": false
}
],
"cvssMetricV30": [
{
"cvssData": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "NONE",
"baseScore": 7.5,
"baseSeverity": "HIGH",
"confidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"integrityImpact": "HIGH",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N",
"version": "3.0"
},
"exploitabilityScore": 3.9,
"impactScore": 3.6,
"source": "nvd@nist.gov",
"type": "Primary"
}
]
},
"published": "2017-12-27T17:08:19.873",
"references": [
{
"source": "cve@mitre.org",
"tags": [
"Vendor Advisory"
],
"url": "https://enigmail.net/download/other/Enigmail%20Pentest%20Report%20by%20Cure53%20-%20Excerpt.pdf"
},
{
"source": "cve@mitre.org",
"url": "https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2017/12/msg00021.html"
},
{
"source": "cve@mitre.org",
"tags": [
"Third Party Advisory"
],
"url": "https://lists.debian.org/debian-security-announce/2017/msg00333.html"
},
{
"source": "cve@mitre.org",
"tags": [
"Third Party Advisory"
],
"url": "https://sourceforge.net/p/enigmail/bugs/709/"
},
{
"source": "cve@mitre.org",
"tags": [
"Third Party Advisory"
],
"url": "https://www.debian.org/security/2017/dsa-4070"
},
{
"source": "cve@mitre.org",
"url": "https://www.mail-archive.com/enigmail-users%40enigmail.net/msg04280.html"
},
{
"source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"tags": [
"Vendor Advisory"
],
"url": "https://enigmail.net/download/other/Enigmail%20Pentest%20Report%20by%20Cure53%20-%20Excerpt.pdf"
},
{
"source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"url": "https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2017/12/msg00021.html"
},
{
"source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"tags": [
"Third Party Advisory"
],
"url": "https://lists.debian.org/debian-security-announce/2017/msg00333.html"
},
{
"source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"tags": [
"Third Party Advisory"
],
"url": "https://sourceforge.net/p/enigmail/bugs/709/"
},
{
"source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"tags": [
"Third Party Advisory"
],
"url": "https://www.debian.org/security/2017/dsa-4070"
},
{
"source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"url": "https://www.mail-archive.com/enigmail-users%40enigmail.net/msg04280.html"
}
],
"sourceIdentifier": "cve@mitre.org",
"vulnStatus": "Modified",
"weaknesses": [
{
"description": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "CWE-347"
}
],
"source": "nvd@nist.gov",
"type": "Primary"
}
]
}
}
}
}
Loading…
Loading…
Drag nodes to arrange them. Double-click a related vulnerability to open it, or a source to visit its link. The Physics button on the left tunes the layout and the simulation; the legend at the bottom left hides or shows nodes by kind and by sighting type.
Experimental. This forecast is provided for visualization only and may change without notice. Do not use it for operational decisions.
Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date | Other |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Vulnerability timeline
Sightings and recorded dates, grouped by day · UTC
Loading timeline…
Loading…
Loading…
The MITRE ATT&CK techniques below are AI-generated suggestions, inferred from the description of the
vulnerability by the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-classification-roberta-base
model, served locally by ML-Gateway.
They have not been verified by an analyst and are provided for guidance only.
The approach is described in our paper Mapping CVEs to MITRE ATT&CK Techniques: A Curated Gold-Set Classifier and the Limits of LLM-Assisted Label Expansion.
Browse all ATT&CK techniques and the vulnerabilities related to each.
The approach is described in our paper Mapping CVEs to MITRE ATT&CK Techniques: A Curated Gold-Set Classifier and the Limits of LLM-Assisted Label Expansion.
Browse all ATT&CK techniques and the vulnerabilities related to each.
Loading…
Related by attack behaviour
Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.